| Revision as of 00:11, 10 September 2010 editChaser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,935 edits copy from my talk and reply, section off ANI notice, fix weird signature issue← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:10, 24 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,427 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (61 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| == Faurisson affair == | |||
| You're really puzzling me. I've added three valid sources, two from ] and one from ].<br /> | |||
| http://www.lemonde.fr/livres/article/2010/06/03/chomsky-a-paris-chronique-d-un-malentendu_1367002_3260.html<br /> | |||
| http://www.lemonde.fr/livres/article/2010/06/03/jean-claude-milner-il-ne-cache-pas-son-mepris-pour-les-intellectuels-parisiens_1367031_3260.html#xtor=AL-32280184<br /> | |||
| http://www.liberation.fr/monde/0101638536-chomsky-s-est-expose-il-est-donc-une-cible-designee<br /> | |||
| ] (]) 11:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| == "Personal Analysis" == | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I do not understand your meaning.I did not add "commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles." I simply changed the word "documentary" to "propaganda." That was not personal analysis any more than saying a film like "Air Force" is propaganda, as posted in its article "Made in the aftermath of the Pearl Harbor attack, it was one of the first of the patriotic films of World War II, also characterized as a propaganda film." That was a commercial film, as is the Moore piece. If one is characterized as such, then you cannot stop the other. If you insist on removing the word from one, then you must also remove it from all the others on Misplaced Pages. Are yo doing that? | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| Thank you. | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 --> | |||
| ] (]) 10:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Leona Lewis== | |||
| It's Malcolm Walker who said that Lewis's range is A3 F6. He's is a true professional, he's a baritone and singing teacher in the ]. You can't reverted that just because you disagree. Please, stop. Two otaves and a fifht is wide for an human voice, only very strained voices can do that, enrich your musical culture.] (]) 18:26 , 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello, something seems to be wrong with the above editor's signature, I think you meant to post a message at ], not ] (which is in the article space, not user space). Regards ,--]] 18:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thank you for pointing that out. ] (]) 18:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Lewis's range is sourced. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :::::Lewis's vocal coach Janet Edwards as well as singing teacher in ] Malcolm Walker claims her range extends from A3 to F6. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Please, stop the war. Lewis's range is sourced. If there were several reliable sources that say this girl has over 2.5 octaves, I'll put them in the article, but currently there is none.] (] • ]) 18:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please stop. We will not make a war just for a range. Lewis's range is very well sourced. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:38, 20 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == {{tl|POV}} == | |||
| Hi, Can you point me to the policy where it says ''"Editors are required to provide an explanation before tagging...."''. As the template state they should promptly state on the reason, and then it goes on to state quite clearly ''"Place {{tl|POV}} at the top of the disputed article, then explain your reasons on the article's talk page"'', nothing about initiating the discussion prior to it's placing. Regards <sup>]]</sup> 19:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==The planning of the 1993 World Trade Center attack== | |||
| what does it means : "you failed to provide an explanation for your poorly sourced edit". | |||
| I've quote Chomsky and provided a reference to the official government investigation. | |||
| What kind of explanation are you expecting ? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| thanks for the response, I still don't get it. | |||
| My criticism is that Noam Chomsky did not present the events as were actually happened, and I've added ref. to the actual chain of events. | |||
| I am the source for this criticism, although it has been made in the past. | |||
| If I'll add a reference to the document who first made this criticism, will it do ? | |||
| ==Proxy== | |||
| You removed a reliable secondary source and replaced it with a self-published source (a blog). I'm going to start a discussion on it on the article talk page. Please give the reasons why think we should be using a blog instead of a non-self published book. ] (]) 11:48, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :, you removed a reliable secondary source and left a blog url as the only source for the text. ] (]) 11:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Roger & Me== | |||
| This is not original research, I added sources and clarified the section that previously had fact tags. If you have anything constructive to add, please do so. However, do not do a wholesale revert. {{unsigned|GoldDragon}} | |||
| == Your comments at ] == | |||
| Your comments on the talk page of a blocked user are not welcome. Mocking someone that is blocked is like poking a stick at a caged animal. It is likely to inflame the situation rather than help. Let's not go down that path, please.--] (]) 22:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Did you examine the source of criticism he tendered for inclusion on Michael Moore? () Please follow the link and read the article. When I examined some of his earlier edits, it seemed obvious this guy is playing games with you all, in the style of Stephen Colbert. ] (]) 06:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::My point was not so much the individual case (I do not see a bright future for this guy unless something changes) as that generally mocking blocked users is a bad idea. But as to the specific case, better he be politely but firmly shown the door than that we kick him in the ass on the way out. Makes it less likely that he joins ] and tries to track us all down in real life and call us in the middle of the night or something.--] (]) 00:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==ANI Notice== | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#ffc">] ]</span> 17:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:10, 24 November 2015
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)