| Revision as of 02:18, 10 September 2010 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits Undid revision 383943385 by A Quest For Knowledge (talk) WP:TE WP:HEAR← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,376,929 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jehochman/Archives 25. (BOT) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Inline image | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |image = File:Naturhistorisk Privatundervisning.jpg | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| | |
|size = 500px | ||
| |align = center | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| |alt = Placeholder alt text | |||
| |archive = User talk:Jehochman/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| |fullwidth = yes | |||
| |capcenter = yes | |||
| |caption = <br/>{{big|{{big|"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"}}}}{{small|]}} | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{/Antizilla}} | |||
| <!--my archives are messed up so I have removed the links. They might be fixed some day--> | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| ] | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Jehochman/Archives | |||
| |format= %%i | |||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| |age=168 | |||
| |minkeepthreads=1 | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:SLIPPERYSLOPE == | |||
| |maxarchsize=350000 | |||
| |numberstart=25 | |||
| Apologies for deleting the redlinked redirect earlier; I ought to have guessed that something was about to happen at the target... ]] 16:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |header={{aan}} | |||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}</nowiki> | |||
| : No worries! I completely understand. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Asshole == | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| The way you have responded to me on the PD talkpage makes it look as though I called a user an asshole. Can you please correct this accusation. ] (]) 16:05, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I will refactor it for clarity. I find the way you've presented this here very ironic, and plan to leave the heading just as it is. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Of course this is all ridiculous. "Grappling with assholes just covers you in their shit" is a figure of speech. I wasn't calling anyone an asshole specifically. Besides, if I was going to use that term I would've said '''arsehole'''. -- ] (]) 17:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::If I were in your situation, I probably would have said something much worse. :-) When you are dealing with a disruptive editor, they will look for any crack to exploit. Cover yourself by not using language that can be misconstrued. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Of course the great irony here is that it all came out of me trying to get Polargeo to moderate his remarks - ]. I might just go and open my veins now. -- ] (]) 18:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Have you heard the expression ''No good deed goes unpunished''? ] <sup>]</sup> 18:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::. -- ] (]) 19:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| * Rather than grappling with anybody, why don't you gather up some evidence and file a request for enforcement if the objectionable behaviors by other editors continues. I wanted to propose some additional sanctions, but could not, because the needed materials were not presented in evidence. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *:I'm not interested in getting people sanctioned. I edit Misplaced Pages because I think the project is awesome and fun to work on. Diff-diving is distasteful to me, and I usually restrict that sort of thing to identifying socking, etc. -- ] (]) 19:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *::Some folks involved in this conflict appear to do a lot of diff diving. At a formal process like arbitration, this gives them a tactical advantage. Much as you dislike collecting evidence, it is a necessary step if you find an editor who is damaging the encyclopedia and refuses to be swayed by informal discussion. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:23, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *:::But is that not what Administrators are for? To go all ] ("Find them and destroy them!") on these troublesome users, leaving us grunts to keep making Misplaced Pages awesome? -- ] (]) 20:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Climate change case == | |||
| Just a note to say I've collapsed the Scjessy discussion thread, please don't add anything more to it (although I don't mind if you strike anything). Thanks. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 17:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Thank goodness! That was turning ugly. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Our recent conflict in perspective on EEML == | |||
| I have made a concerted effort to put EEML in the past. Please do not paint yourself as a victim as that only re-litigates the case and forces me to respond in kind. Whenever two parties view themselves as the victim and the other as the aggressor, nothing good comes of that. We should consider a calming spot of tea together. Best, ]<small> ►]</small> 19:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I agree that we should let past controversies die, and instead focus on creating excellent quality content. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == About your edit to ] == | |||
| <s>Go piss up a rope</s> er just kidding. Your tweak better describes this annoying behavior then my initial wording. See ] in an essay I wrote. --] (]) 21:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I am so tempted to blank your post! Have you seen ] yet? ] <sup>]</sup> 21:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I would have to agree with with the !voter in the second MFD who said it's not funny but an obvious attempt at humor. BTW, I think would be perfect for ]. --] (]) 21:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Do I have a "sister" called Sapho? == | |||
| ;~) ] (]) 23:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == User:Badagnani == | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Hello. I am one of the individuals that was involved in a past discussion in which a dispute arose between ] and another user. Though I have not been on the receiving end of Badagnani's allegedly continued belligerence, and though I am in no way affiliated with him, I have always thought that his presence in our project was an overall net positive. His some-odd 136,000 contributions and 1,300 new articles were often made within esoteric areas of interest (e.g., traditional Asian ] and ]) that seldom see edits by anyone, let alone dedicated contributors. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Earlier today, I stumbled upon his userpage while reviewing my list of contributions and saw that he had been blocked indefinitely. Looking over the AN/I discussion, I realize that this was done as an act of mercy--so as to prevent a year long ArbCom block--but it has now been eight months and frankly it seems rather unlikely that he is going to appeal within a reasonable time frame. Considering the rationale behind his most recent block, the relative severity of offenses which preceded it, and his overall value to our project, would you perhaps be willing to consider lifting it at this point in time? <span style="background:black;color:white"> '''''— '''''] </span> 06:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| : They can request unblocking with a statement of what productive things they will do, and perhaps what un productive behavior they will avoid. ] <sup>]</sup> 07:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Your wrong venue tag == | |||
| </div> | |||
| Your wrong venue tag is out of line and unhelpful. We were asked to report edit warring on CC articles and this is being logged in the PD, particularly with regard to any articles that are protected as the result of the edit war such as this one. Please remove the tag and let arb clerks and arbs decide what is the wrong venue. Since you placed the tag FellGleaming has taken the opportunity you have provided to make a nasty comment about even admins not knowing where to post things. I would remove it myself but I don't wish to cause a commotion. ] (]) 11:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :: You have my consent to remove the tag. The thread looked like a lot of useless bickering. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024
"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"Source
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)