Misplaced Pages

List of states with limited recognition: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:43, 24 September 2010 view sourceAlinor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers10,385 edits Non-UN member states recognized by at least one UN member← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:14, 10 December 2024 view source JSwift49 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users11,522 edits Excluded entities: Seems clear to me? 
(1,000 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see ] -->
[[File:Limited recognition.png|thumb|500px|{{legend|#FF0000|No recognition by any state}}
{{Distinguish|text=]s}}
{{legend|#FF8484|Recognized by UN non-members only}}
{{Redirect|Disputed states|a list of territorial disputes including these|List of territorial disputes}}
{{legend|#FF8040|UN non-members recognized by at least one UN member}}
{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
{{legend|#808040|UN member states, not recognized by at least one other UN member state}}]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2024}}


[[File:Limited Recognition States.svg|thumb|upright=1.8|
This '''list of states with limited recognition''' gives an overview of contemporary ] entities, that wish to be recognized as ]s but do not have complete worldwide ].
{{legend|#C74355|UN member states that at least one other UN member state does not recognise}}
{{legend|#F8CD44|Non-UN member states recognised by at least one UN member state}}
{{legend|#246788|Non-UN member states recognised only by other non-UN member states or not recognized by any other state}}
]]


A number of ] have declared independence and sought ] from the ] as ]s, but have not been universally recognised as such. These entities often have '']'' control of their territory. ] have existed in the past.
== Definition ==


There are two traditional theories used to indicate how a sovereign state comes into being. The ] (codified in the 1933 ]) defines a state as a ] if it meets the following criteria:
There are two traditional doctrines that provide interpretations of when a ] should be ] as a member of the ]. The "]" theory defines a state as a ] if it meets the following criteria: 1) a defined territory; 2) a permanent population; 3) a government and 4) a capacity to enter into relations with other states. According to declarative theory, an entity's statehood is independent of its recognition by other states. By contrast, the "]" theory defines a state as a person of international law if it is recognized as such by another state that is already a member of the international community.<ref>Thomas D. Grant, ''The recognition of states: law and practice in debate and evolution'' (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1999), chapter 1.</ref>


# a defined territory
Several entities reference either or both doctrines in order to legitimize their claims to statehood. There are, for example, entities which meet the declarative criteria (with '']'' complete or partial control over their claimed territory, a government and a permanent population), but their statehood is not recognized by one or more other states. Non-recognition is often a result of conflicts with other countries that claim those entities as integral parts of their territory. In other cases, two or more partially recognized entities may claim the same territorial area, with each of them ''de facto'' in control of a portion of it (as have been the cases of the Republic of China and People's Republic of China, and North and South Korea). Entities that are only recognized by a minority of the world's states usually reference the declarative doctrine to legitimize their claims. Some states do not establish relations with new nations quickly and thus do not recognize them despite having no dispute and sometimes favorable relations. These are excluded from the list.
# a permanent population
# a government, and
# a capacity to enter into relations with other states.


According to the declarative theory, an entity's statehood is independent of its recognition by other states. By contrast, the ] defines a state as a person of international law only if it is recognised as such by other states that are already a member of the international community.<ref>Grant, Thomas D., ''The recognition of states: law and practice in debate and evolution'' (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1999), chapter 1.</ref><ref name=RecognitionofStates>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EWgEv1Qq2TwC&pg=PA64|title=Recognition in International Law|last1=Lauterpacht|first1=Hersch|page=64|publisher=]|isbn=9781107609433|year=2012|access-date=19 January 2018|archive-date=15 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230115130619/https://books.google.com/books?id=EWgEv1Qq2TwC&pg=PA64|url-status=live}}</ref>
There are also entities which do not have control over any territory or do not unequivocally meet the declarative criteria for statehood but have been recognized to exist '']'' as sovereign entities by at least one other state. Historically this has happened in the case of the ] (1870–1929), ], ] and ] (during Soviet annexation), among other cases. The recognition of the ] by several states is a contemporary example.


]s often reference either or both doctrines in order to legitimise their claims to statehood. There are, for example, entities which meet the declarative criteria (with '']'' partial or complete control over their claimed territory, a government and a permanent population), but whose statehood is not recognised by any other states. ] is often a result of conflicts with other countries that claim those entities as integral parts of their territory.<ref name="Carnegie">{{cite web | title=Introduction: The Strange Endurance of De Facto States | website=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace | date=3 December 2018 | url=https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/12/03/introduction-strange-endurance-of-de-facto-states-pub-77841 | access-date=12 October 2023}}</ref> In other cases, two or more partially recognised states may claim the same territorial area, with each of them ''de facto'' in control of a portion of it (for example, ] and ], or the ] (Taiwan) and the ]). Entities that are recognised by only a minority of the world's states usually reference the declarative doctrine to legitimise their claims.<ref name="Grzybowski 2017">{{cite journal | last=Grzybowski | first=Janis | title=To Be or Not to Be: The Ontological Predicament of State Creation in International Law | journal=European Journal of International Law | publisher=Oxford University Press (OUP) | volume=28 | issue=2 | year=2017 | issn=0938-5428 | doi=10.1093/ejil/chx031 | pages=409–432| doi-access=free }}</ref>
Some countries on this list, such as ] and ], fulfill the declarative criteria, are recognized by the large majority of other nations and are members of the United Nations, but appear here because one or more other states do not recognize their statehood, due to territorial claims or other conflicts.


In many situations, international non-recognition is influenced by the presence of a foreign military force in the territory of the contested entity, making the description of the country's ''de facto'' status problematic. The international community can judge this military presence too intrusive, reducing the entity to a ] where effective ] is retained by the foreign power.<ref name="Lemkin2008">
See ] for similar entities that have existed in the past. See ] for unrecognized governments without control over the territory claimed.
{{cite book
| last = Lemkin|first= Raphaël|author-link= Raphael Lemkin
Currently there are 192 ] (UN) ]. The ] is generally recognized as ], but is not a member of the United Nations (it has, however, ] status within the organization).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.un.org/members/nonmembers.shtml |title=Non-member State |publisher=Un.org |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref>
| title = Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=y0in2wOY-W0C&pg=PA11
| access-date = 30 June 2019 |year= 2008
| publisher= The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
| isbn = 978-1-58477-901-8|page= 11 | orig-year = 1944
| quote = The creation of puppet states or of puppet governments does not give them any special status under international law in the occupied territory. Therefore the puppet governments and puppet states have no greater rights in the occupied territory than the occupant himself. Their actions should be considered as actions of the occupant and hence subject to the limitations of the Hague Regulations.
}}
</ref> Historical cases in this sense can be seen in ]-led ]<ref name="Middlebush 1934 pp. 677–683">{{cite journal | last=Middlebush | first=Frederick A. | title=The Effect of the Non-Recognition of Manchukuo | journal=American Political Science Review | publisher=Cambridge University Press (CUP) | volume=28 | issue=4 | year=1934 | issn=0003-0554 | doi=10.2307/1947199 | pages=677–683| jstor=1947199 | s2cid=147030868 }}</ref> or the ]-created ] and ] before and during ]. In the 1996 case '']'', the ] judged Turkey for having exercised authority in the territory of ].<ref name="Rudolf 1997 pp. 532–537">{{cite journal | last=Rudolf | first=Beate | title=Loizidou v. Turkey (Merits) | journal=American Journal of International Law | publisher=Cambridge University Press (CUP) | volume=91 | issue=3 | year=1997 | issn=0002-9300 | doi=10.2307/2954189 | pages=532–537| jstor=2954189 | s2cid=228739345 }}</ref>


There are also entities that do not have control over any territory or do not unequivocally meet the declarative criteria for statehood but have been recognised to exist as sovereign entities by at least one other state. Historically, this has happened in the case of the ] (1870–1929); ], ], and ] (during Soviet annexation);<ref>{{cite book |title=Illegal annexation and state continuity: the case of the incorporation of the Baltic states by the USSR |last=Mälksoo |first=Lauri |year=2003 |publisher=M. Nijhoff Publishers |isbn=978-90-411-2177-6 |page=76 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p5w6AQAAIAAJ |quote=incorporation into the Soviet Union in 1940 took place against the will of the population, and was never recognised de jure by most countries |access-date=12 October 2023 |archive-date=17 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117153520/https://books.google.com/books?id=p5w6AQAAIAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> and ] at the time of its declaration of independence in 1988.<ref name="q044">{{cite web | last=Daraghmeh | first=Mohammed | title=Palestinian official suggests a Kosovo-like declaration of independence | website=Statesboro Herald | date=2018-05-21 | url=https://www.statesboroherald.com/local/associated-press/palestinian-official-suggests-a-kosovo-like-declaration-of-independence/ | access-date=2024-09-29}}</ref> The ] is ]. See ] for unrecognised governments without control over the territory claimed.
=== Criteria for inclusion ===
The criteria for inclusion means a polity must either: have '']'' control over a territory, a population, a government, a capacity to enter into relations with other states, claim statehood, and lack recognition from at least one state, or it must be recognized as a state by at least one state and lack recognition from at least one state. Some noteworthy entities that do meet some of these criteria are ].


== Criteria for inclusion ==
== Present geopolitical entities by level of recognition ==
{{further|Country#Statehood}}


State practice relating to the recognition of a country typically falls somewhere between the '']'' and '']'' approaches.<ref>{{cite book |title=International law |url=https://archive.org/details/internationallaw00shaw_380 |url-access=limited |first1=Malcolm Nathan |last1=Shaw |year=2003 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page= |edition=5th |isbn=978-0-521-53183-2 }}</ref><ref name="Cohen 1961 p. 1127">{{cite journal | last=Cohen | first=Rosalyn | title=The Concept of Statehood in United Nations Practice | journal=University of Pennsylvania Law Review | volume=109 | issue=8 | date=1961 | pages=1127–1171 | doi=10.2307/3310588 | jstor=3310588 | s2cid=56273534 | url=https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol109/iss8/4 | access-date=26 January 2024 | archive-date=19 January 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240119201855/https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol109/iss8/4/ | url-status=live | issn=0041-9907}}</ref><ref name="Kelsen 1941 pp. 605–617">{{cite journal | last=Kelsen | first=Hans | title=Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations | journal=The American Journal of International Law | publisher=American Society of International Law | volume=35 | issue=4 | year=1941 | issn=0002-9300 | jstor=2192561 | pages=605–617 | doi=10.2307/2192561 | s2cid=147309779 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2192561 | access-date=18 January 2024 | archive-date=18 January 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118213745/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2192561 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Lauterpacht 1944 pp. 385–458">{{cite journal | last=Lauterpacht | first=H. | title=Recognition of States in International Law | journal=The Yale Law Journal | publisher=The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. | volume=53 | issue=3 | year=1944 | issn=0044-0094 | jstor=792830 | pages=385–458 | doi=10.2307/792830 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/792830 | access-date=18 January 2024 | archive-date=18 January 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240118213745/https://www.jstor.org/stable/792830 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Anon. x863">{{cite web
=== Non-UN member states not recognized by any state ===
| title=Principles of the Recognition of States
{|class="wikitable" style="width: 100%"
| url=https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/13240/27_53YaleLJ385_1943_1944_.pdf?sequence=2
| access-date=18 January 2024
| archive-date=18 March 2024
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240318013739/https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/13240/27_53YaleLJ385_1943_1944_.pdf?sequence=2
| url-status=live
}}</ref>

The criteria for inclusion on this list are limited to ] that claim ], lack recognition from at least one ], and either:<ref name="Bedjaoui 1991 p. 47]">{{cite book | last=Bedjaoui | first=M. | title=International Law: Achievements and Prospects | publisher=Springer Netherlands | series=Democracy and power | year=1991 | isbn=978-92-3-102716-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jrTsNTzcY7EC&pg=PA47 | access-date=23 January 2024 | page=47] | archive-date=14 November 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221114113127/https://books.google.com/books?id=jrTsNTzcY7EC&lpg=PA47&client&pg=PA47 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Seguin 2011 f032">{{cite web | last=Seguin | first=Denis | title=What makes a country? | website=The Globe and Mail | date=29 July 2011 | url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/what-makes-a-country/article595868/ | access-date=24 January 2024 | archive-date=24 January 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240124003740/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/what-makes-a-country/article595868/ | url-status=live }}</ref>

* satisfy the declarative theory of statehood, ''or''<ref name="Anon. e743">{{cite web
| title= Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States
| url= https://www.ilsa.org/Jessup/Jessup15/Montevideo%20Convention.pdf
| access-date= 18 January 2024
| archive-date= 14 January 2024
| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20240114065544/https://www.ilsa.org/Jessup/Jessup15/Montevideo%20Convention.pdf
| url-status= live
}}</ref><ref name="Encyclopedia Britannica 1999 f033">{{cite web | title=States, Sovereignty, Treaties | website=Encyclopædia Britannica | date=26 July 1999 | url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/international-law/States-in-international-law | access-date=18 January 2024 | archive-date=30 April 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220430152154/https://www.britannica.com/topic/international-law/States-in-international-law | url-status=live }}</ref>
* are ] (constitutive theory) as a state by at least one UN member state.<ref name="academic.oup.com s696">{{cite web | title=Statehood and Recognition | website=academic.oup.com | url=https://academic.oup.com/book/3288/chapter-abstract/144288950?redirectedFrom=fulltext | access-date=21 January 2024 | archive-date=26 January 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240126171048/https://academic.oup.com/book/3288/chapter-abstract/144288950?redirectedFrom=fulltext | url-status=live }}</ref>

== Background ==
] wearing the colors of the Somaliland flag]]

There are {{UNnum}} ] (UN) ], while both the ] and ] have ] in the United Nations.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/members/nonmembers.shtml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070209033633/http://www.un.org/members/nonmembers.shtml|archive-date=9 February 2007 |title=Non-member State |publisher=United Nations |access-date=25 June 2010}}</ref> However, some countries that fulfill the declarative criteria, are recognised by the large majority of other states and are members of the United Nations are still included in the list here because one or more other states do not recognise their statehood, due to territorial claims or other conflicts.

Some states maintain informal (officially non-diplomatic) relations with states that do not officially recognise them. ] (the Republic of China) is one such state, as it maintains unofficial relations with many other states through its ], which allow regular consular services. This allows Taiwan to have economic relations even with states that do not formally recognise it. A total of 56 states, including Germany,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Laenderinformationen/LaenderReiseinformationenA-Z.jsp |title=Germany – Countries A to Z |publisher=Auswaertiges-amt.de |access-date=25 June 2010 |archive-date=28 July 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100728191255/http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Laenderinformationen/LaenderReiseinformationenA-Z.jsp |url-status=live }}</ref> Italy,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.esteri.it/MAE/Templates/SediTemplate.aspx?NRMODE=Published&NRNODEGUID=|title=Ambasciate Consolati e Uffici di promozione|publisher=Esteri.it |access-date=29 April 2011}}{{Dead link|date=February 2016}}</ref> the United States,<ref>] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506050404/http://www.usembassy.gov/#Taiwan |date=6 May 2021 }} Retrieved 3 February 2011</ref> and the United Kingdom,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/find-an-embassy/?l=T |title=Find an Embassy |publisher=Fco.gov.uk |date=14 March 2008 |access-date=25 June 2010 |archive-date=26 July 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100726163107/http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/find-an-embassy/?l=T |url-status=live }}</ref> maintain some form of unofficial mission in Taiwan. ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mfa-ks.net/?page=2,50 |title=Foreign Missions in Kosovo |publisher=Government of ], Ministry of Foreign Affairs |access-date=4 November 2010 |archive-date=24 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180824122839/http://www.mfa-ks.net/?page=2,50 |url-status=live }}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.trncpio.org/trncpio/en/index.asp?sayfa=cms&dmid=0&cmsid=170&ssid=256489879|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728130326/http://www.trncpio.org/trncpio/en/index.asp?sayfa=cms&dmid=0&cmsid=170&ssid=256489879|archive-date=28 July 2011 |title=Representative Offices Abroad |publisher=Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Public Information Office |access-date=4 November 2010}}</ref> ],<ref name="AbkhazRepresentation">{{cite web|url=http://mfaapsny.org/en/foreign-policy/abkhazia/|title=Abkhazia in the system of international relations|publisher=Government of Abkhazia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs|access-date=12 December 2017|archive-date=24 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224062010/http://mfaapsny.org/en/foreign-policy/abkhazia/|url-status=live}}</ref> ],<ref name="AbkhazRepresentation"/> the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://76.162.150.8/relaciones_dib.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110810223605/http://76.162.150.8/relaciones_dib.htm|title=Pagina nueva 1|archive-date=10 August 2011}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://somalilandgov.com/country-profile/embasies/ |title=Contacts and addresses of the Somaliland Representative Offices around the world |publisher=Government of Somaliland |access-date=1 August 2015 |archive-date=24 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224062031/https://somalilandgov.com/country-profile/embasies/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.webgaza.net/resources/Embassies_of_Palestine.htm |title=Embassies, Missions, General and Special Delegations of Palestine abroad |publisher=WebGaza.net |access-date=4 November 2010 |archive-date=26 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110626061410/http://www.webgaza.net/resources/Embassies_of_Palestine.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> also host informal diplomatic missions, and/or maintain special delegations or other informal missions abroad.

== States that are state parties within the United Nations System ==
{|class="wikitable sortable"
|+UN member states not recognised by at least one UN member state
|- |-
! style="width:15%;"|Name ! scope=col style="width:12%;" | Name
! style="width:40%;"|Status ! scope=col style="width:5%;" | Declared
! style="width:24%;"|Other claimants ! scope=col style="width:38%;" class=unsortable | Status
! style="width:16%;"|Further information ! scope=col style="width:24%;" class=unsortable | Other claimants
! style="width:7%;"|References ! scope=col style="width:16%;" class=unsortable | Further information
|- |-
| {{flag|Somaliland}} ! scope=row | {{flag|Armenia}}
| 1991
| Somaliland was granted independence by the ] in 1960 after the decolonization of ] and merged with ] a few days later to form ]. Withdrew from Somalia in 1991. Currently no state recognizes it.
| Armenia, independent since 1991, is not recognised by one UN member, ], which has a position of supporting ] since the ].<ref> Senate of Pakistan&nbsp;— Senate foreign relations committee, 2008</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110813064453/http://www.today.az/news/politics/30102.html |date=13 August 2011 }} 13 September 2006 – Today.Az</ref>
| {{flag|Somalia}} claims Somaliland as part of its sovereign territory.
| style="text-align:center;"| None
| ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ])
| <ref>. Retrieved 14 September 2009.</ref>
|-
! scope=row | {{flag|China}}
| 1949
| The People's Republic of China (PRC), proclaimed in 1949,<ref>{{cite web|access-date=28 February 2008|url=http://www.hkhrm.org.hk/english/law/const01.html|title=Constitution of the People's Republic of China|publisher=International Human Rights Treaties and Documents Database|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000116042442/http://hkhrm.org.hk/english/law/const01.html|archive-date=16 January 2000}}</ref> is the more widely recognised of the two claimant governments of ], the other being Taiwan (the Republic of China). The United Nations recognised the ROC as the sole representative of China until 1971, when it decided to give this recognition to the PRC instead (see ]). The PRC and the ROC do not recognise each other's statehood, and each enforces its own version of the ] meaning that no state can recognise both of them at the same time.{{efn|name=China}} The states that recognise the ROC ({{Numrec|ROC|alt=UN members and the ] as of|asof=E}}) regard it as the sole legitimate government of China and therefore do not recognise the PRC.
| {{flag|Taiwan}} (the Republic of China) considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of all of China, and therefore claims exclusive sovereignty over all territory controlled by the PRC.<ref name="Horton 2019">{{cite web | last=Horton | first=Chris | title=Taiwan's Status Is a Geopolitical Absurdity | website=The Atlantic | date=8 July 2019 | url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/07/taiwans-status-geopolitical-absurdity/593371/ | access-date=25 September 2023 | archive-date=16 June 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240616061553/https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/07/taiwans-status-geopolitical-absurdity/593371/ | url-status=live }}</ref> See also: ].
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr />]
|-
! scope=row | {{flag|Cyprus}}
| 1960
| The Republic of Cyprus, independent since 1960, is not recognised by one UN member (]) and one non-UN member (]), due to the ongoing ] over the island. Turkey does not accept the Republic's rule over the whole island and refers to it as the "Greek Administration of Southern Cyprus".<ref>European Parliament Directorate-General External Policies Policy Department {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121019010705/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/nt/553/553930/553930en.pdf |date=19 October 2012 }} 20 January 2005 Retrieved 3 February 2011</ref><ref>{{cite web|access-date=28 February 2008|url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/cyprus/|date=28 February 2008|work=CIA World Factbook|title=Cyprus|publisher=]|archive-date=9 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210109202203/https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/cyprus/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=1 October 2005 |title=Cyprus exists without Turkey's recognition: president |url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/01/content_3570894.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060313165152/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/01/content_3570894.htm |archive-date=13 March 2006 |access-date=7 March 2008 |agency=Xinhua News Agency}}</ref><ref>European Parliament's Committee on Foreign
Affairs {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160222210404/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2008/389024/EXPO-AFET_NT(2008)389024_EN.pdf |date=22 February 2016 }} 18 February 2008 Retrieved 3 February 2011</ref>
| {{flag|Northern Cyprus}} claims the northeastern portion of the island of Cyprus.
| Foreign ], missions (], ])
|-
! scope=row | {{flag|Israel}}
| 1948
| Israel, founded in 1948, is ].<ref>{{cite web|access-date=28 February 2008|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/israel.asp|date=14 May 1948|author=Government of Israel|title=Declaration of Israel's Independence 1948|publisher=]|archive-date=7 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190107092242/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/israel.asp|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=United States Congress|title=H. RES. 1249|url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hres1249ih/pdf/BILLS-110hres1249ih.pdf|date=5 June 2008|access-date=2 November 2011|archive-date=16 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180316022934/https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hres1249ih/pdf/BILLS-110hres1249ih.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mythsandfacts.org/ReplyOnlineEdition/chapter-1.html |title='Reply' Online Book Chapter 1 |publisher=Mythsandfacts.org |access-date=25 June 2010 |archive-date=27 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727104815/http://www.mythsandfacts.org/ReplyOnlineEdition/chapter-1.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cfr.org/world/khartoum-resolution/p14841?breadcrumb=%2Fpublication%2Fpublication_list%3Ftype%3Dessential_document%26page%3D69 |title=Khartoum Resolution |publisher=] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305134850/http://www.cfr.org/world/khartoum-resolution/p14841?breadcrumb=%2Fpublication%2Fpublication_list%3Ftype%3Dessential_document%26page%3D69 |archive-date=5 March 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Government of Israel|title=Israel's Diplomatic Missions Abroad: Status of relations|url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/abouttheministry/pages/israel-s%20diplomatic%20missions%20abroad.aspx#note|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs|access-date=4 April 2011|archive-date=5 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170505112815/http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/AboutTheMinistry/Pages/Israel-s%20Diplomatic%20Missions%20Abroad.aspx#note|url-status=live}}</ref> The ] (PLO), which enjoys majority international recognition as sole representative of the Palestinian people, recognised Israel in 1993. In January 2018 and October 2018,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/top-palestinian-body-calls-for-revoking-recognition-of-israel-nixing-agreements/|title=Top Palestinian body calls for revoking recognition of Israel, nixing agreements|first=Michael|last=Bachner|website=The Times of Israel|access-date=20 August 2021|archive-date=20 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210820141656/https://www.timesofisrael.com/top-palestinian-body-calls-for-revoking-recognition-of-israel-nixing-agreements/|url-status=live}}</ref> the Palestinian Central Council voted to suspend recognition of Israel, but this position has yet to be acted upon by Palestinian President ].<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/07/pa-mahmoud-abbas-declares-suspension-deals-israel-190726070533729.html|title= PA's Mahmoud Abbas declares suspension of all deals with Israel|date= 26 July 2019|publisher= Al Jazeera|access-date= 25 November 2019|archive-date= 15 October 2019|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20191015145807/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/07/pa-mahmoud-abbas-declares-suspension-deals-israel-190726070533729.html|url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20181030-plo-suspends-recognition-of-israel/|title=PLO suspends recognition of Israel|date=30 October 2018|website=Middle East Monitor|access-date=9 April 2019|archive-date=25 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190425154808/https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20181030-plo-suspends-recognition-of-israel/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{flag|Palestine}} considers itself to be the legitimate government of the ], which is under ], and the ].<br> {{flag|Syria}} considers itself to be the legitimate government of the ], a territory which ].
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr />]
|-
! scope=row | {{flag|North Korea}}
| 1948
| North Korea (officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea), independent since 1948, is not recognised by one UN member, ].<ref name="atimes">{{cite web|access-date=29 February 2008|url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/GA04Dg01.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050104171505/http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/GA04Dg01.html|url-status=unfit|archive-date=4 January 2005|title=Seoul's double-talk on reunification |work=]|date=4 January 2005 |last=Scofield |first=David }}</ref><ref name="Korea Herald">{{cite web | last1=Da-gyum | first1=Ji | last2=Ji-hyoung | first2=Son | title=Kim Yo-jong's reference to South as 'Republic of Korea' may indicate change | website=The Korea Herald | date=11 July 2023 | url=https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20230711000640 | access-date=23 February 2024 | archive-date=23 February 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240223172557/https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20230711000640 | url-status=live }}</ref>
| {{flag|South Korea}} considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of ], and ] all territory controlled by North Korea.<ref name="atimes"/>
| Foreign ], missions (], ])
|-
! scope=row | {{flag|South Korea}}
| 1948
| South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea), independent since 1948, is not recognised by one UN member, ].<ref>{{cite web|access-date=28 February 2008|url=http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/8.htm|date=7 October 2000|author=US Library of Congress|title=World War II and Korea|publisher=Country Studies|archive-date=10 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160310082139/http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/8.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|access-date=29 February 2008|url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F01EFD71538F930A3575AC0A962958260|title=China, Backing North Korea, Quits Armistice Commission|newspaper=The New York Times|date=3 September 1994|author=Sterngold, James|archive-date=5 March 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080305171415/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F01EFD71538F930A3575AC0A962958260|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{flag|North Korea}} considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of ], and ] all territory controlled by South Korea.
| Foreign ], missions (], ])
|} |}


{|class="wikitable sortable"
=== Non-UN member states recognized only by non-UN members ===
|+UN General Assembly observer states not recognised by at least one UN member state
|-
! scope=col style="width:12%;" | Name
! scope=col style="width:5%;" | Declared
! scope=col style="width:38%;" class=unsortable | Status
! scope=col style="width:24%;" class=unsortable | Other claimants
! scope=col style="width:16%;" class=unsortable | Further information
|-
! scope=row | {{flag|Palestine}}
| 1988
| Israel gained control of the ] as a result of the ] in 1967, but has never formally annexed them. The State of Palestine (commonly known as Palestine) was ] in 1988 by the ] (PLO), which is recognised by a majority of UN member states and the UN itself as the sole representative of the Palestinian people. Since the end of the ] the Israeli government has gradually moved its armed forces and settlers out of certain parts of Palestine's claimed territory, while still maintaining varying degrees of control over most of it.<ref name="saeb">{{Cite news|author=Staff writers|title=Palestinians 'may declare state'|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7254434.stm|publisher=BBC News|date=20 February 2008|access-date=22 January 2011|archive-date=25 August 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110825044716/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7254434.stm|url-status=live}}:"Saeb Erekat, disagreed arguing that the Palestine Liberation Organisation had already declared independence in 1988. "Now we need real independence, not a declaration. We need real independence by ending the occupation. We are not Kosovo. We are under Israeli occupation and for independence we need to acquire independence".</ref> The ] (PNA), which performs limited internal government functions over certain areas of Palestine, was established in 1994. The 2007 ] resulted in competing governments claiming to represent the PNA and Palestine, with Fatah exercising authority exclusively over the West Bank and enjoying majority recognition from UN member states, and a separate Hamas leadership ] exclusively over the Gaza area (except for a short period from 2014 to 2016).{{efn|name=Israel}} Palestine is currently {{Numrec|Pal|officially recognised as a state by}} UN member states,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pna.gov.ps/Government/gov/recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine.asp|title=International Recognition of the State of Palestine|work=Official website of the Palestinian National Authority|date=November 1988|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031010182914/http://www.pna.gov.ps/Government/gov/recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine.asp|archive-date=10 October 2003}}. The PNA has publicly acknowledged recognition from 94 states, including the former ].</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.webgaza.net/resources/Embassies_of_Palestine.htm |title=Embassies of Palestine |publisher=Webgaza.net |access-date=25 June 2010 |archive-date=26 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110626061410/http://www.webgaza.net/resources/Embassies_of_Palestine.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> the Holy See,<ref>{{Cite news|author=Bannoura, Saed|title=124 Out of 193 Countries Recognize Palestinian Independence|url=http://www.imemc.org/article/61902|newspaper=IMEMC News|publisher=International Middle East Media Center|date=28 August 2011|access-date=28 August 2011|archive-date=15 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111015052850/http://www.imemc.org/article/61902|url-status=live}}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{Cite journal|author=Shelley, Toby|title=Spotlight on Morocco|journal=West Africa|year=1988|location=London|issue=3712–3723: 5–31 December|publisher=West Africa Publishing Company Ltd|page=2282}} "...&nbsp;the SADR was one of the first countries to recognise the state of Palestine."</ref> The remaining UN member states, including Israel, do not recognise the State of Palestine. The ] designates the claimed Palestinian territories as "occupied" by Israel,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/unispal/document/committee-on-exercise-of-inalienable-rights-of-palestinian-people-ga-resolution-ares7318/|title=Committee on Exercise of Inalienable Rights of Palestinian People – GA Resolution (A/RES/73/18)|first=Christopher|last=Heaney|access-date=30 March 2019|archive-date=21 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200921183023/https://www.un.org/unispal/document/committee-on-exercise-of-inalienable-rights-of-palestinian-people-ga-resolution-ares7318/|url-status=live}}</ref> and accorded Palestine ] status in 2012<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20550864 |title=Palestinians win upgraded UN status by wide margin |publisher=BBC News |date=29 November 2012 |access-date=29 November 2012 |archive-date=30 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121130032235/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20550864 |url-status=live }}</ref> (see ]). Palestine also has membership in the ], the ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|publisher=United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization|title=Arab States: Palestine|url=http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/worldwide/arab-states/palestine/|access-date=3 December 2011|archive-date=4 January 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104131813/http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/worldwide/arab-states/palestine/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{flag|Israel}} regards the area claimed by Palestine as "disputed" territory (that is, territory not legally belonging to any state).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFA-archive/2003/Pages/DISPUTED%20TERRITORIES-%20Forgotten%20Facts%20About%20the%20We.aspx |title=Disputed Territories- Forgotten Facts About the West Bank and Gaza Strip |publisher=Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs |date=1 February 2003 |access-date=30 July 2021 |archive-date=27 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227111213/http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFA-Archive/2003/Pages/DISPUTED%20TERRITORIES-%20Forgotten%20Facts%20About%20the%20We.aspx |url-status=live }}</ref>{{efn|name=Israel|Israel allows the PNA to execute some functions in the ], depending on ]. Israel maintains ] (retaining control of borders: ],<ref name="GazaSeaAir">{{cite web|url=http://www.btselem.org/gaza_strip/control_on_air_space_and_territorial_waters|title=Israel's control of the airspace and the territorial waters of the Gaza Strip|work=btselem.org|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=28 June 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140628105536/http://www.btselem.org/gaza_strip/control_on_air_space_and_territorial_waters|url-status=live}}</ref> sea ],<ref name="GazaSeaAir"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://dissidentvoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Gaza-map-08s-fishing-limits-20090119.jpg|title=Map of Gaza fishing limits, "security zones"|work=dissidentvoice.org|date=December 2009|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=26 July 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726000805/http://dissidentvoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Gaza-map-08s-fishing-limits-20090119.jpg|url-status=live}}</ref> ]<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203102430/http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/peace/guide/pages/israels%20disengagement%20plan-%20renewing%20the%20peace%20process%20apr%202005.aspx |date=3 February 2016 }}: "Israel will guard the perimeter of the Gaza Strip, continue to control Gaza air space, and continue to patrol the sea off the Gaza coast. ... Israel will continue to maintain its essential military presence to prevent arms smuggling along the border between the Gaza Strip and Egypt (]), until the security situation and cooperation with Egypt permit an alternative security arrangement."</ref>) in the ] (its interior and Egypt portion of the land border are under ]), maximum in "]" and varying degrees of interference elsewhere.<ref name="DoreGold">{{cite web|author=Dore Gold|url=http://www.jcpa.org/brief/brief005-3.htm|title=Legal Acrobatics: The Palestinian Claim that Gaza is Still "Occupied" Even After Israel Withdraws|work=Jerusalem Issue Brief|volume=5|issue=3|publisher=Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs|date=26 August 2005|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=21 June 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100621082606/http://jcpa.org/brief/brief005-3.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="AbrahamBell">{{cite web|last=Bell|first=Abraham|url=http://jcpa.org/article/international-law-and-gaza-the-assault-on-israel%E2%80%99s-right-to-self-defense/|title=International Law and Gaza: The Assault on Israel's Right to Self-Defense|work=Jerusalem Issue Brief|volume=7|issue=29|publisher=Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs|date=28 January 2008|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=16 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160216092227/http://jcpa.org/article/international-law-and-gaza-the-assault-on-israel%E2%80%99s-right-to-self-defense/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="HerzliyaCon">{{cite press release|url=http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/PressRoom/2008/Pages/Address%20by%20FM%20Livni%20to%20the%208th%20Herzliya%20Conference%2022-Jan-2008.aspx|title=Address by Foreign Minister Livni to the 8th Herzliya Conference|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel|date=22 January 2008|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=5 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305164344/http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/PressRoom/2008/Pages/Address%20by%20FM%20Livni%20to%20the%208th%20Herzliya%20Conference%2022-Jan-2008.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="ZakSalih">{{cite web|author=Zak M. Salih|url=http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2005_fall/gaza.htm|title=Panelists Disagree Over Gaza's Occupation Status|publisher=University of Virginia School of Law|date=17 November 2005|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303200844/http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2005_fall/gaza.htm|archive-date=3 March 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="IsDisengagement">{{cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2004/10/28/israel-disengagement-will-not-end-gaza-occupation|title=Israel: "Disengagement" Will Not End Gaza Occupation|work=Human Rights Watch|date=28 October 2004|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=23 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160123112518/https://www.hrw.org/news/2004/10/28/israel-disengagement-will-not-end-gaza-occupation|url-status=live}}</ref> See also ].<br /><ref name="saeb"/><ref name="DoreGold"/><ref name="AbrahamBell"/><ref name="HerzliyaCon"/><ref name="ZakSalih"/><ref name="IsDisengagement"/> }}
| Foreign ], missions (], ]) <hr /> ], ], ]
|}


{|class="wikitable" style="width: 100%" {|class="wikitable sortable"
|+UN specialized agency member states not recognised by at least one UN member state
|- |-
! style="width:15%;"|Name ! scope=col style="width:12%;" | Name
! style="width:40%;"|Status ! scope=col style="width:5%;" | Declared
! style="width:24%;"|Other claimants ! scope=col style="width:38%;" class=unsortable | Status
! style="width:16%;"|Further information ! scope=col style="width:24%;" class=unsortable | Other claimants
! style="width:7%;"|References ! scope=col style="width:16%;" class=unsortable | Further information
|- |-
| {{flag|Nagorno-Karabakh}} ! scope=row | {{flag|Cook Islands}}
| 1965
| Nagorno-Karabakh declared its independence in 1992. It is currently recognised by one UN non-member: ].
| The Cook Islands became a state in ] with ] in 1965. Although the Cook Islands are fully self-governing and behave as a sovereign state in ], their constitutional status is different from that of a fully independent state, considering that all Cook Islands nationals are ], and the country's head of state is the ].<ref>{{cite web | title=About Cook Islands | website=New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade | date=11 February 2021 | url=https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/australia-and-pacific/cook-islands/new-zealand-high-commission-to-the-cook-islands/about-cook-islands/ | access-date=21 April 2023 | archive-date=25 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230425043511/https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/australia-and-pacific/cook-islands/new-zealand-high-commission-to-the-cook-islands/about-cook-islands/ | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{cite web|url=http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/2015/September/09-10-03.htm|title=Home Page – Pacific Islands Report|website=pidp.eastwestcenter.org|access-date=30 July 2017|archive-date=19 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019062945/http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/2015/September/09-10-03.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/9050/Uncharted%20Waters.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |title=Uncharted Waters: Has the Cook Islands become Eligible for Membership in the United Nations |last=Smith |first=Stephen Eliot |journal=New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law |volume=8 |pages=169–215 |access-date=30 July 2017 |archive-date=26 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210626034320/https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/9050/Uncharted%20Waters.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |url-status=live }}</ref> As of 2015, the Cook Islands had established ] with 43 states,<ref name="intaff.gov.ck 2019">{{cite web | title=Cook Islands' application for membership | website=intaff.gov.ck | date=13 November 2019 | url=http://www.intaff.gov.ck/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Cook-Islands-Application-for-ILO-Membership.pdf | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191113231136/http://www.intaff.gov.ck/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Cook-Islands-Application-for-ILO-Membership.pdf | archive-date=13 November 2019 | url-status=live| access-date=21 April 2023}}</ref> while the number as of May 2024 is at least ], as well as the ], ], ] and the ]. Some countries establishing diplomatic relations such as the United States have recognized the Cook Islands as a fully sovereign state, while some such as France have not.<ref>{{cite web | title=U.S confirms recognition of the Cook Islands as a sovereign state | website=PINA | date=30 September 2022 | url=https://pina.com.fj/2022/09/30/u-s-confirms-recognition-of-the-cook-islands-as-a-sovereign-state/ | access-date=21 April 2023 | archive-date=14 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414215742/https://pina.com.fj/2022/09/30/u-s-confirms-recognition-of-the-cook-islands-as-a-sovereign-state/ | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Cook Islands | website=La France en Nouvelle Zélande | date=21 December 2018 | url=https://nz.ambafrance.org/Cook-Islands | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407044706/https://nz.ambafrance.org/Cook-Islands | archive-date=7 April 2023 | url-status=live | access-date=21 April 2023}}</ref> The Cook Islands are a member of nine ], and the ] currently classifies the Cook Islands as a "non-member state", a category unique only to it and ].<ref name="auto4">{{Cite web |url =https://www.un.org/geospatial/content/world-today |title =United Nations – The World Today |date =1 September 2019 |access-date =21 April 2023 |publisher =United Nations |archive-date =3 December 2022 |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20221203170009/https://www.un.org/geospatial/content/world-today |url-status =live }}</ref><ref name="auto3">{{Cite web|url = https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/WPP2013/Chapters/a_Preface.pdf|title = UN: "data for 197 countries: all 193 member states, two observer states (the Holy See and Palestine) and two non-member states (Cook Islands and Niue)"|access-date = 30 July 2017|publisher = United Nations|archive-date = 16 November 2022|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20221116025049/https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/WPP2013/Chapters/a_Preface.pdf|url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="auto2">{{Cite web|title = A World Tour of the States not recognized by the UN|url = http://www.lejournalinternational.fr/A-World-Tour-of-the-States-not-recognized-by-the-UN_a2998.html|access-date = 5 September 2015|first = Marine |last = Mulcey |translator-first = Lucie |translator-last = Perrier|archive-date = 6 December 2022|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20221206041508/https://www.lejournalinternational.fr/A-World-Tour-of-the-States-not-recognized-by-the-UN_a2998.html|url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/HistoricalInfo.aspx#CookIslands|title=United Nations Treaty Collection|publisher=United Nations|access-date=30 July 2017|archive-date=10 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200610022419/https://treaties.un.org/Pages/HistoricalInfo.aspx#CookIslands|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{flag|Azerbaijan}} claims Nagorno-Karabakh as part of its sovereign territory.
| State in ] with<br>{{flag|New Zealand}}, considered by some as having no sovereignty.
| ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ]) <hr /> ]
|align=center|<ref>. Retrieved 14 September 2009.</ref><ref>{{ru icon}} (translated title), September 2008.</ref><ref>{{ru icon}}, September 2008.</ref><ref name="pridnestrovie.net">{{cite web|url=http://pridnestrovie.net/foreignpolicy_full.html |title=In detail: The foreign policy of Pridnestrovie |publisher=Pridnestrovie.net |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref>
|- |-
| {{flag|Transnistria}} (Pridnestrovie) ! scope=row | {{flag|Kosovo}}
| 2008
| Transnistria declared its independence in 1990. It is currently recognized by three UN non-members: ], ] and ].<ref name="pridnestrovie.net"/>
| Kosovo ] in 2008.<ref>{{cite news|access-date=28 February 2008|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7249034.stm|date=17 February 2008|title=Kosovo MPs proclaim independence|publisher=BBC News|archive-date=15 February 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090215131649/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7249034.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> It is currently recognised by ] UN members, ], the ] and ]. {{Numrec/Kos|W}} other UN members have recognised Kosovo and subsequently withdrawn recognition. The ], as stipulated in ], has administered the territory since 1999 through the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unmikonline.org/press/reports/N9917289.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080216011030/http://www.unmikonline.org/press/reports/N9917289.pdf|archive-date=16 February 2008 |title=Kosovo |access-date=25 June 2010}}</ref> with cooperation from the ] since 2008. Kosovo is a member of two ] (the ] and the ]), as well as the ], ], and the ], among others.
| {{flag|Moldova}} claims Transnistria as part of its sovereign territory.
| {{flag|Serbia}} claims ].
| ], ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr /> ]; ]
|align=center|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-06-16|url=http://video.acasa.ro/view_video/1cbc0583298a23831612/transnistria-europe-s-black-hole-2-4.html|title=Abkhazia: Ten Years On |publisher=BBC 2|year=2001}}</ref>
|-
! scope=row | {{flag|Niue}}
| 1974
| Niue became a state in ] with ] in 1974 after a ]. Although Niue is fully self-governing and behaves as a sovereign state in ], its constitutional status is different from that of a fully independent state, considering that all Niue nationals are ], and the country's head of state is the ].<ref>{{cite web | last=Affairs | first=New Zealand Ministry of Foreign | title=Niue | website=New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade | date=7 November 2022 | url=https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/australia-and-pacific/niue/ | access-date=21 April 2023 | archive-date=21 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230421185603/https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/australia-and-pacific/niue/ | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="auto1"/> As of April 2023, Niue has established ] with at least ], as well as the ] and the ]. Niue is a member of eight ], and the ] currently classifies Niue as a "non-member state", a category unique only to it and the ].<ref name="auto4"/><ref name="auto3"/><ref name="auto2"/><ref name="auto"/>
| State in ] with<br>{{flag|New Zealand}}, considered by some as having no sovereignty.
| Foreign ], missions (], ]) <hr /> ]
|} |}


== States that are not state parties within the United Nations System ==
=== Non-UN member states recognized by at least one UN member ===
{|class="wikitable sortable"

|+Non-UN member states recognised by at least one UN member state
{|class="wikitable" style="width: 100%"
|- |-
! style="width:15%;"|Name ! scope=col style="width:12%;" | Name
! style="width:40%;"|Status ! scope=col style="width:5%;" | Declared
! style="width:24%;"|Other claimants ! scope=col style="width:38%;" class=unsortable | Status
! style="width:16%;"|Further information ! scope=col style="width:24%;" class=unsortable | Other claimants
! style="width:7%;"|References ! scope=col style="width:16%;" class=unsortable | Further information
|- |-
| {{flag|Abkhazia}} ! scope=row | {{flag|Abkhazia}}
| 1999
| Abkhazia declared its independence in 1992. It is currently recognized by four UN member-states (], ], ] and ]), and two UN non-member states (] and ]).<ref name="tiraspoltimes.com"></ref>
| Abkhazia declared its independence in 1999.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3261059.stm |title=Regions and territories: Abkhazia |publisher=BBC News |access-date=31 March 2011 |date=8 February 2011 |archive-date=5 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105235542/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3261059.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> It is currently recognised by 5 UN member states (], ], ], ], and ]), and two non-UN member states (] and ]).<ref name="Medvedev">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7582181.stm|title=Russia recognises Georgian rebels|date=26 August 2008|publisher=BBC News|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=10 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160310145010/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7582181.stm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name='Venezuela-Georgia'>{{cite news | url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-russia-chavez-idUSTRE5895PF20090910 | title=Venezuela's Chavez draws closer to Moscow | date=10 September 2009 | work=] | access-date=20 October 2009 | archive-date=13 January 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113122314/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-russia-chavez-idUSTRE5895PF20090910 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite web|access-date=26 February 2008|url=http://www.c-r.org/downloads/Abkhazia_TenYearsOn_2001_ENG.pdf|title=Abkhazia: Ten Years On|publisher=Conciliation Resources|year=2001|author=Clogg, Rachel|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160216052312/http://www.c-r.org/downloads/Abkhazia_TenYearsOn_2001_ENG.pdf|archive-date=16 February 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="tiraspoltimes.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.tiraspoltimes.com/news/south_ossetia_opens_embassy_in_abkhazia.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422030914/http://www.tiraspoltimes.com/news/south_ossetia_opens_embassy_in_abkhazia.html |archive-date=22 April 2008 |title=South Ossetia opens embassy in Abkhazia |work=The Tiraspol Times}}</ref> Two additional UN member states (] and ]) had recognised Abkhazia, but subsequently withdrew their recognition.<ref>{{cite web|author=Government of Tuvalu|title=On the establishment of diplomatic relations between Republic of Abkhazia and Tuvalu|url=http://www.mfaabkhazia.net/en/node/1082|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111111113856/http://www.mfaabkhazia.net/en/node/1082|archive-date=11 November 2011|date=20 September 2011|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs|access-date=24 September 2011}}</ref><ref name="interpressnews.ge">{{cite web|url=http://www.interpressnews.ge/en/politicss/56198-tuvalu-takes-back-recognition-of-independence-of-abkhazia-and-so-called-south-ossetia.html|title=Tuvalu takes back recognition of independence of Abkhazia and so-called South Ossetia|date=31 March 2014|access-date=31 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140331143130/http://www.interpressnews.ge/en/politicss/56198-tuvalu-takes-back-recognition-of-independence-of-abkhazia-and-so-called-south-ossetia.html|archive-date=31 March 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="mfa.gov.ge">{{cite web|url=http://mfa.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=59&info_id=17401|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006191232/http://mfa.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=59&info_id=17401|archive-date=6 October 2014|title=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia – Ministry's Statements|access-date=30 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Government of Vanuatu|title=Vanuatu's recognition to the Republic of Abkhazia|url=http://www.governmentofvanuatu.gov.vu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=95&Itemid=65|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110624160025/http://www.governmentofvanuatu.gov.vu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=95&Itemid=65|archive-date=24 June 2011|date=17 June 2011|access-date=24 September 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=21 January 2012 |title=Natapei withdraws recognition of Abkhazia {{!}} Vanuatu Daily Post |url=http://www.dailypost.vu/content/natapei-withdraws-recognition-abkhazia |access-date=8 December 2023 |archive-date=21 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120121080902/http://www.dailypost.vu/content/natapei-withdraws-recognition-abkhazia |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-20/georgia-says-vanuatu-has-withdrawn-recognition-of-abkhazia|title=Georgia Says Vanuatu Has Withdrawn Recognition of Abkhazia|date=20 May 2013|publisher=Bloomberg News|access-date=30 September 2014|archive-date=3 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151103211400/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-20/georgia-says-vanuatu-has-withdrawn-recognition-of-abkhazia|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{flag|Georgia}} claims Abkhazia as part of its sovereign territory.
| ], ] | {{flag|Georgia}} claims Abkhazia as ].
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr /> ]
|align=center|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-26|url=http://www.c-r.org/resources/occasional-papers/abkhazia-ten-years-on.php|title=Abkhazia: Ten Years On |publisher=Conciliation Resources|year=2001|author=Clogg, Rachel }}</ref><ref name="Medvedev"> - BBC, 2008-08-26 </ref><ref name='Venezuela-Georgia'>{{cite news | url =http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE5895PF20090910 | title=Venezuela's Chavez draws closer to Moscow | date=2009-09-10 | work=] | accessdate=2009-10-20}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2009/12/mil-091215-rianovosti11.htm |title=Georgia mocks Nauru's recognition of Abkhazia |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref>
|- |-
| {{flag|Republic of China}} (]) ! scope=row | {{flag|Northern Cyprus}}
| 1983
| The Republic of China (ROC, commonly known as Taiwan), constitutionally formed in 1912, is currently recognized as a state by ] UN members and the ]. All other UN member states do not officially recognize the ROC as a state; some of them regard its controlled territory as ''de jure'' part of the ] (PRC) while some others have used careful diplomatic language to avoid taking a position as to whether the current territory of the ROC is part of the PRC.{{ref|a|a}}
| Northern Cyprus ] in 1983 with its official name being the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" (TRNC). It is recognised by one UN member, ]. The ] and the ] have granted Northern Cyprus observer status under the name "Turkish Cypriot State". ] defines the declaration of independence of Northern Cyprus as legally invalid.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.un.int/cyprus/scr541.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030828074921/http://www.un.int/cyprus/scr541.htm|archive-date=28 August 2003|title=Security Council resolution 541 (1983) on Cyprus|publisher=United Nations|access-date=25 June 2010}}</ref> The ] stated ] that "the Security Council in an exceptional character attached illegality to the DOI of TRNC because it was, or would have been connected with the unlawful use of force".<ref name="International Court of Justice">{{cite web |url=http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/15987.pdf |title=Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Paragraph 81 |work=International Court of Justice |date=22 July 2010 |access-date=11 February 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100821055950/http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/15987.pdf |archive-date=21 August 2010 }}</ref>
| {{flag|People's Republic of China}} claims that the Republic of China no longer exists and claims all of the ] as part of its sovereign territory.
| {{flag|Cyprus}} claims the TRNC as part of its sovereign territory.
| ], ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr /> ]
|align=center|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://members.aol.com/JoJoLewis/Taiwan/Taiwan_index.html|date=2002-08-04|author=Lewis, Joe|title=Taiwan Independence |publisher=Digital Freedom Network }}</ref>
|- |-
! scope=row | {{flag|Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic}}
| {{flag|Kosovo}}
| 1976
| Kosovo declared its independence in 2008. It is currently recognized by {{Kosovorecognition}} UN members and one UN non-member state, the ] (Taiwan), although Kosovo does not recognize the ROC. The ], as stipulated in ], has administered the territory since 1999 through the ], with cooperation from the ] since 2008.
| ] invaded and annexed most of ], forcing Spain to withdraw from the territory in 1975.<ref name="Mundy">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6XzuIbQAXUIC|title=Western Sahara: War, Nationalism, and Conflict Irresolution|last1=Zunes|first1=Stephen|last2=Mundy|first2=Jacob|pages=5–6|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-8156-3219-1|date=4 August 2010|access-date=3 November 2020}}</ref> In 1976, the ] declared the independence of Western Sahara as the ] (SADR).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wsahara.net/sadr.html|title=Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic|date=27 February 1976|access-date=28 February 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080502035045/http://www.wsahara.net/sadr.html|archive-date=2 May 2008}}</ref> The SADR is largely a ] located in ], which claims the entire territory of Western Sahara, but controls only a ] of it. The SADR is recognised by ] UN member states and ]. {{Numrec|SADR|W=Y|link=N}} other UN member states have recognised the SADR but subsequently retracted or suspended recognition, pending the outcome of a ] on ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arso.org/03-2.htm|title=Here the states which recognize the SADR. It is a non-official list, with dates of recognition and cancellation|publisher=ARSO|access-date=7 February 2011|archive-date=16 July 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716183754/http://www.arso.org/03-2.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://awsa.org.au/background/|title=About Western Sahara|publisher=Australia Western Sahara Association|date=November 2006|access-date=4 January 2010|archive-date=6 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906073206/http://awsa.org.au/background/|url-status=live}}</ref> The remaining UN member states, including ], have never recognised the SADR. The SADR is a member of the ]. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 34/37 recognised the right of the Western Sahara people to self-determination and recognised also the Polisario Front as the representative of the Western Sahara people.<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 October 2011 |title=Resolutions : General Assembly (GA), 34th session : United Nations (UN) |url=http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r34.htm |access-date=8 December 2023 |archive-date=10 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111010102815/http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r34.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> Western Sahara is listed on the ]. Other than Morocco and the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-recognizing-sovereignty-kingdom-morocco-western-sahara/|title=Proclamation on Recognizing The Sovereignty of the Kingdom of Morocco Over The Western Sahara|date=10 December 2020|via=]|work=]|access-date=13 January 2021|archive-date=13 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210213233131/https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-recognizing-sovereignty-kingdom-morocco-western-sahara/|url-status=live}}</ref> no state officially recognises Morocco's annexation of Western Sahara, but some states support the ]. The ] supports Morocco's claim over the entire territory of Western Sahara.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.arabnews.com/node/1189656/middle-east|title=Morocco king rejects independence for Western Sahara|date=7 November 2017|website=Arab News|access-date=19 November 2019|archive-date=10 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220610171838/https://www.arabnews.com/node/1189656/middle-east|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{flag|Serbia}} claims Kosovo as part of its sovereign territory.
| {{flag|Morocco}} claims Western Sahara (including the area controlled by the SADR) as ].
| ], ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr /> ]; ]
|align=center|<ref>{{cite news|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7249034.stm|date=2008-02-17|title=Kosovo MPs proclaim independence|publisher=BBC News }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unmikonline.org/press/reports/N9917289.pdf |title=Kosovo |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref>
|- |-
| {{flag|Northern Cyprus}} ! scope=row | {{flag|South Ossetia}}
| 1992
| Northern Cyprus declared its independence in 1983. It is currently recognized by one UN member, ]. The ] has granted Northern Cyprus observer status under the name "Turkish Cypriot State". ] defines the declaration of independence of Northern Cyprus as legally invalid.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.un.int/cyprus/scr541.htm |title=Security Council resolution 220 (1966) on Cyprus |publisher=Un.int |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref>
| South Ossetia declared its independence in 1992.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://mfa.rsogov.org/en/node/80 |title=A reply of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of South Ossetia to IA "Res" Question Concerning the Act of Adoption of RSO State Independence on 29 of May 1992 |publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of South Ossetia |date=29 May 2010 |access-date=26 May 2022 |archive-date=24 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220124174804/https://mfa.rsogov.org/en/node/80 |url-status=live }}</ref> It is currently recognised by ] UN member states (], ], ], ], and ]), and three non-UN member states (], ] and ]).<ref name="Medvedev"/><ref name='Venezuela-Georgia' /><ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://eurasianet.org/s/syria-formally-recognizes-abkhazia-and-south-ossetia|title=Syria formally recognizes Abkhazia and South Ossetia|date=29 May 2018|website=Eurasianet|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180529152044/https://eurasianet.org/s/syria-formally-recognizes-abkhazia-and-south-ossetia|archive-date=29 May 2018|access-date=30 May 2018}}</ref><ref name="tiraspoltimes.com"/> One additional UN member state (]) had recognised South Ossetia, but subsequently withdrew its recognition.<ref name="interpressnews.ge" /><ref name="mfa.gov.ge" />
| {{flag|Cyprus}} claims Northern Cyprus as part of its sovereign territory.
| {{flag|Georgia}} claims South Ossetia as ].
| ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr /> ]
|align=center|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://antiwar.com/hadar/?articleid=8042|author=Hadar, Leon|date=2005-11-16|title=In Praise of 'Virtual States' |publisher=AntiWar }}</ref>
|- |-
! scope=row | {{flag|Taiwan}}
| {{flagicon|Palestine}} ]
| 1912/1949
| The Palestinian Liberation Organization ] the State of Palestine in Algiers in 1988. The PLO had no control over any part of the proclaimed territory at the time. Today it has limited control over some of this territory through the ] established in 1994 according to the ] with Israel. The exact number of countries recognizing the 1988 proclaimed state is unknown, due to the equivocal nature of many official statements of acknowledgment.<ref>Crawford, James (1999). "Israel (1948-1949) and Palestine (1998-1999): Two Studies in the Creation of States", in Goodwin-Gil G.S. and S. Talmon, , Oxford University Press Inc., New York, pp. 110-115</ref> The PA Prime Minister, Salam Fayyad, estimates the number at several dozens.<ref>In an interview to Uri Avneri (), the PA Prime Minister, Salam Fayyad said: "Dozens of countries recognized this state , and the PLO representatives there enjoy the official status of ambassadors. But did this improve the situation of the Palestinians?"</ref> Among the countries that issued clear statements of recognition are the ], member states of the ], and most member states of the ]. As a result of the ] and the ], the Israeli government has transferred certain powers and responsibilities of self-government to the ], which are in effect in parts of the West Bank, and used to be effective in the Gaza Strip before Hamas's takeover. Palestine participates in the ] as a non-member entity with observer status.
| Taiwan (formally known as the Republic of China), enjoyed majority recognition as the sole government of China until roughly the late 1950s/1960s, when a majority of UN member states started to gradually switch recognition to the ] (PRC).<ref>Global Investment and Business Center, Inc. Staff ''Taiwan Foreign Policy and National Security Yearbook'' 2011 Second Edition International Business Publications, USA {{ISBN|0-7397-3660-4}} {{Dead link|date=August 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} available at ]</ref> The United Nations itself recognised the ROC as the sole representative of China until 1971, when it decided to give this recognition to the PRC instead (see ]). The ROC and PRC do not recognise each other's statehood, and each enforces its own version of the ] meaning that no state can recognise both of them at the same time.{{efn|name=China|Both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China ], stating ] is a single sovereign entity encompassing both the area controlled by the PRC and the area controlled by the ROC. Neither the PRC nor the ROC officially recognise each other's claim to statehood, and they compete for diplomatic recognition as the only legitimate representative of China among other states. Historically, both the PRC and the ROC have broken off diplomatic relations with any state engaging in diplomatic relations or claiming to recognise the other, though the ROC has in some instances accepted dual recognition since it transitioned to democracy in the 1990s. However, as of 2021 no state officially recognises both the ROC and the PRC.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-State-Recognition/Visoka-Doyle-Newman/p/book/9780815354871|title=Routledge Handbook of State Recognition|website=Routledge & CRC Press|access-date=19 July 2021|archive-date=19 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210719144319/https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-State-Recognition/Visoka-Doyle-Newman/p/book/9780815354871|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/07/world/asia/07iht-costa.1.6036203.html?_r=0|title=Taiwan cuts ties with Costa Rica over recognition for China|newspaper=The New York Times|date=7 June 2007|access-date=11 February 2016|archive-date=18 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160718033818/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/07/world/asia/07iht-costa.1.6036203.html?_r=0|url-status=live}}</ref>}} The ROC is currently recognised by {{numrec|ROC}} UN members and the ]. All remaining UN member states, as well as the ] and ], recognise the PRC instead of the ROC and either accept the PRC's territorial claim over Taiwan or take a non-committal position on Taiwan's status. A significant number of PRC-recognising UN member states, as well as the ], nonetheless conduct officially non-diplomatic relations with the ROC, designating it as either "Taipei" or "Taiwan". Since the early 1990s, the ROC has sought separate United Nations membership under a variety of names, including "Taiwan".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/taiwans-un-dilemma-to-be-or-not-to-be/|title=Taiwan's UN Dilemma: To Be or Not To Be|first=Sigrid|last=Winkler|date=20 June 2012|access-date=29 March 2019|archive-date=31 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200331180632/https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/taiwans-un-dilemma-to-be-or-not-to-be/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{flag|Israel}} holds the ultimate control<ref>Israel allows the PNA to execute some functions in the ], depending on ] with ] (retaining control of borders: ], ], ]) in the ] and maximum in "Area C".</ref> over all of the claimed territories <ref>{{Cite web
| The {{flag|People's Republic of China}} considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of all of China, and therefore ].<ref name="Horton 2019"/> See also: ].
| last = Gold
| Foreign ], missions (], ])<hr />]
| first = Dore
|}
| coauthors = Institute for Contemporary Affairs

| title = Legal Acrobatics: The Palestinian Claim that Gaza is Still "Occupied" Even After Israel Withdraws
{|class="wikitable sortable"
| work = Jerusalem Issue Brief, Vol. 5, No. 3
|+Non-UN member states recognised only by other non-UN member states
| publisher = Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
| date = 26 August 2005
| url = http://www.jcpa.org/brief/brief005-3.htm
| accessdate = 2010-07-16}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web
| last = Bell
| first = Abraham
| title = International Law and Gaza: The Assault on Israel's Right to Self-Defense
| work = Jerusalem Issue Brief, Vol. 7, No. 29
| publisher = Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
| date = 28 January 2008
| url = http://www.jcpa.org/brief/brief005-3.htm
| accessdate = 2010-07-16}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release
| title = Address by Foreign Minister Livni to the 8th Herzliya Conference
| publisher = Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel
| date = 22 January 2008
| url = http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Speeches+by+Israeli+leaders/2008/Address+by+FM+Livni+to+the+8th+Herzliya+Conference+22-Jan-2008.htm?DisplayMode=print
| accessdate = 2010-07-16}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web
| last = Salih
| first = Zak M.
| title = Panelists Disagree Over Gaza’s Occupation Status
| publisher = University of Virginia School of Law
| date = 17 November 2005
| url = http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2005_fall/gaza.htm
| accessdate = 2010-07-16}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web
| title = Israel: 'Disengagement' Will Not End Gaza Occupation
| publisher = Human Rights Watch
| date = 29 October 2004
| url = http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2004/10/29/isrlpa9577.htm
| accessdate = 2010-07-16}}</ref> and considers them disputed territory.
| ]
|align=center|<ref>. The PNA has publicly acknowledged recognition from 94 states, including the former ].</ref><ref>, November 2009.</ref><ref>, February 2008.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sarep.org/ |title=South African Representative Office to the Palestinian National Authority |publisher=Sarep.org |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://palestineuzbek.com/english.php?action=4 |title=Embassy of the State of Palestine to the Republic of Uzbekistan, Central Asia and Azerbaijan |publisher=Palestineuzbek.com |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.webgaza.net/resources/Embassies_of_Palestine.htm |title=Embassies of Palestine |publisher=Webgaza.net |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.palestine.sk/about.html |title=Embassy of the State of Palestine in Bratislava |publisher=Palestine.sk |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref>
|- |-
! scope=col style="width:12%;" | Name
| {{flag|Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic}}
! scope=col style="width:5%;" | Declared
| Both the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) and ] claim sovereignty over the territory of ]. The SADR, which declared its independence in 1976, has been recognised by 83 UN members and the ]. Several states, however, have since retracted or suspended recognition, pending the outcome of a ] on ], with 58 retaining diplomatic ties.<ref>{{ar icon}} {{cite web|url=http://www.rasd-state.ws/reconocimientos_rasd.htm |title=List of states recognising the SADR|publisher=Government of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic|month=November|year=2006|accessdate=2010-01-04}} Flags listed alongside date of recognition. Most of these states have since suspended their relations.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://awsa.org.au/?page_id=4 |title=About Western Sahara|publisher=Australia Western Sahara Association|month=November|year=2006|accessdate=2010-01-04}}</ref> Western Sahara is currently regarded as ''de jure'' part of Morocco by 25 UN members and the ]. It is currently listed on the ].
! scope=col style="width:38%;" class=unsortable | Status
| {{flag|Morocco}} claims Western Sahara as part of its sovereign territory.
! scope=col style="width:24%;" class=unsortable | Other claimants
| ], ]
! scope=col style="width:16%;" class=unsortable | Further information
|align=center|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://www.wsahara.net/sadr.html|date=1976-02-27|author=Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic|title=Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic|publisher=Western Sahara Online }}</ref>
|- |-
| {{flag|South Ossetia}} ! scope=row | {{flag|Transnistria}}
| 1990
| South Ossetia declared its independence in 1991. It is currently recognized by four UN member-states (], ], ] and ]), and two non-UN member states (] and ]).<ref name="tiraspoltimes.com"/><ref>http://lenta.ru/news/2009/12/16/nauru/<!-- article is in Russian, but the most up to date ref available, please replace this ref with an English article asap--></ref>
| Transnistria (officially the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic) declared its independence in 1990. It is recognised by two non-UN members: ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|access-date=16 June 2008|url=http://video.acasa.ro/documentare/transnistria---europe-s-black-hole-2-4--1cbc0583298a23831612.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091221144730/http://video.acasa.ro/documentare/transnistria---europe-s-black-hole-2-4--1cbc0583298a23831612.html|archive-date=21 December 2009|title=Abkhazia: Ten Years On |publisher=BBC 2|year=2001}}</ref>
| {{flag|Georgia}} claims South Ossetia as part of its sovereign territory.
| {{flag|Moldova}} claims Transnistria as ].
| ], ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ]) <hr /> ], ]
|align=center|<ref name="Medvedev"/><ref name='Venezuela-Georgia' /><ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://iys.cidi.org/humanitarian/hsr/03b/ixl95.html|date=2003-09-23|author=Stojanovic, Srdjan|title=OCHA Situation Report |publisher=Center for International Disaster Information }}</ref>
|} |}
<small>{{note|a|a}}Both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China ], stating ] is ''de jure'' a single sovereign entity encompassing both the area currently controlled by the PRC and the area currently controlled by the ROC.</small>


{|class="wikitable sortable"
===Partially unrecognized UN member states===
|+Non-UN member states not recognized by any other state
{|class="wikitable" style="width: 100%"
|- |-
! style="width:15%;"|Name ! scope=col style="width:12%;" | Name
! style="width:40%;"|Status ! scope=col style="width:5%;" | Declared
! style="width:24%;"|Other claimants ! scope=col style="width:38%;" class=unsortable | Status
! style="width:16%;"|Further information ! scope=col style="width:24%;" class=unsortable | Other claimants
! style="width:7%;"|References ! scope=col style="width:16%;" class=unsortable | Further information
|- |-
| {{flag|Armenia}} ! scope=row | {{flag|Somaliland}}
| 1991
| Armenia, independent since 1991, is currently not recognized by one UN member, ], as Pakistan has a position of supporting ] in the ] conflict.
| Somaliland declared its independence in 1991. It claims to be the legal successor to the ], a short lived sovereign state that existed from 26 June 1960 (when the ] gained full independence from the United Kingdom) to 1 July 1960 (when the State of Somaliland united with Somalia to form the ]).<ref>{{Cite news |date=11 July 2011 |title=Somaliland profile|publisher=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-14115069 |access-date=8 December 2023 |archive-date=16 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201216233149/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-14115069 |url-status=live }}</ref> It is not officially recognised by any state, though it maintains unofficial relations with several UN member states and the ] (Taiwan).<ref name="e139">{{cite web | last=Hagi | first=Mohamed | title=A Future Outlook: Prospects for Somaliland-Taiwan Relations | website=Global Taiwan Institute | date=2024-05-01 | url=https://globaltaiwan.org/2024/05/a-future-outlook-prospects-for-somaliland-taiwan-relations/ | access-date=2024-07-25 | quote=It is an official relationship in numerous respects, but not diplomatic. Put another way, the bilateral partnership is deemed official due to the signatures of two foreign ministers. On the other hand, it differs from Taiwan’s relationships with its more formal diplomatic allies.}}</ref><ref name="f170">{{cite web | last=Blas | first=Javier | title=A Land Deal Cranks Up the Tension in the Red Sea | publisher=Bloomberg News | date=3 January 2024 | url=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-01-03/ethiopia-somaliland-deal-cranks-up-tension-in-the-red-sea | access-date=18 May 2024 | archive-date=16 June 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240616061624/https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-01-03/ethiopia-somaliland-deal-cranks-up-tension-in-the-red-sea | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url = https://en.mofa.gov.tw/CountryInfoEn.aspx?CASN=2&n=1289&sms=0&s=200 |author = Asia West and Africa Department|title = Republic of Somaliland| publisher = Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China|access-date = 28 February 2023 |archive-date = 10 December 2022 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20221210115329/https://en.mofa.gov.tw/CountryInfoEn.aspx?CASN=2&n=1289&sms=0&s=200}}</ref> Taiwan and Somaliland have ] in each other's countries, similarly to how Taiwan conducts relations with other countries that do not recognize it.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202008170019 |title=Taiwan opens representative office in Somaliland |date=17 August 2020 |access-date=1 March 2023 |archive-date=1 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230301013701/https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202008170019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.france24.com/en/20200909-somaliland-launches-representative-office-in-taiwan |title=Somaliland launches representative office in Taiwan |date=9 September 2020 |access-date=1 March 2023 |archive-date=1 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230301013656/https://www.france24.com/en/20200909-somaliland-launches-representative-office-in-taiwan |url-status=live }}</ref> On 1 January 2024, Ethiopia and Somaliland signed a ] giving Ethiopia access to the Red Sea via the port of ] in return for a potential recognition.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kheyr |date=1 January 2024 |title=Somaliland and Ethiopia: Recognition for Sea Access |url=https://thesomalidigest.com/somaliland-and-ethiopia-recognition-for-sea-access/ |access-date=2 January 2024 |website=Somali News in English {{!}} The Somali Digest|archive-date=2 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102011319/https://thesomalidigest.com/somaliland-and-ethiopia-recognition-for-sea-access/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last1=Endeshaw |first1=Dawit |last2=Sheikh |first2=Abdi |date=1 January 2024 |title=Ethiopia signs pact to use Somaliland's Red Sea port |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/landlocked-ethiopia-signs-pact-use-somalilands-red-sea-port-2024-01-01 |access-date=2 January 2024 |work=] |archive-date=30 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240530081911/https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/landlocked-ethiopia-signs-pact-use-somalilands-red-sea-port-2024-01-01/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|
| {{flag|Somalia}} claims Somaliland as part of its sovereign territory.
| ]
| ], missions (], ])
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref> Senate of Pakistan&nbsp;— Senate foreign relations committee, 2008</ref><ref> 13 September 2006 - Today.Az</ref>
|- |}

| {{flag|People's Republic of China}} (PRC)
== Other entities with limited recognition of sovereignty ==
| The People's Republic of China (PRC), proclaimed in 1949, is currently not recognized by one UN non-member, the ] (ROC, commonly known as Taiwan). The PRC does not accept diplomatic relations with states that recognize the ROC (currently ] UN member states and the ]). None of these states officially recognize the PRC as a state, though certain governments have made statements expressing an interest in official relations with both the PRC and the ROC.<ref></ref> According to ], the PRC is the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations.{{ref|a|a}}
{|class="wikitable sortable"
| {{flag|Republic of China}} considers itself the sole legal government over all of ].
|+Political entities recognised as sovereign by at least one UN member state
| ], ]
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://www.hkhrm.org.hk/english/law/const01.html|title=Constitution of the People's Republic of China |publisher=International Human Rights Treaties and Documents Database }}</ref>
|-
| {{flag|Cyprus}}
| Cyprus, independent since 1960, is currently not recognized by one UN member (]) and one non-member (]), due to the ongoing ] over the island.
| {{flag|Northern Cyprus}} claims part of the island of Cyprus
| ]
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref>http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/nt/553/553930/553930en.pdf</ref><ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cy.html|date=2008-02-28|author=CIA World Factbook|title=Cyprus |publisher=] }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-03-07|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/01/content_3570894.htm|title=Cyprus exists without Turkey's recognition: president |publisher=XINHUA|date=2005-10-01 }}</ref><ref>http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies/download.do?file=20800#search=%20Turkey</ref>
|-
| {{flag|Israel}}
| Israel, independent since 1948, is currently not recognized by ] UN members and one UN non-member, the ] (see ]).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/14841/khartoum_resolution.html?breadcrumb=%2Fpublication%2Fpublication_list%3Ftype%3Dessential_document%26page%3D69 |title=Khartoum Resolution |publisher=]}}</ref> It is ], which claims the right to set up a state in territory currently controlled by Israel.
| The ] claims the right to establish a state in territory currently held by Israel, specifically in the ] and the ].
| ]
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/israel.htm|date=1948-05-14|author=Government of Israel|title=Declaration of Israel's Independence 1948 |publisher=] }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mythsandfacts.org/ReplyOnlineEdition/chapter-1.html |title='Reply' Online Book Chapter 1 |publisher=Mythsandfacts.org |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref>
|- |-
! scope=col style="width:12%;" | Name
| {{flag|North Korea}}
! scope=col style="width:5%;" | Declared
<!--Before adding Estonia and France to this entry, provide sources that state non-recognition. Please, mind the difference between recognition and diplomatic relations. France does not have diplomatic relations with North Korea, but that does not mean it does not recognize it.-->
! scope=col style="width:38%;" class=unsortable | Status
| North Korea, independent since 1948, is currently not recognized by two UN members: ] and ].<ref name="ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp">{{cite web
! scope=col style="width:24%;" class=unsortable | Other claimants
| url = http://www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~worldjpn/documents/texts/docs/19650622.T1E.html
! scope=col style="width:16%;" class=unsortable | Further information
| title = Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea
| accessdate = 2008-10-27
}}</ref>
| {{flag|South Korea}} claims to be the sole legitimate government of ].
| ].
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref name="ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp"/><ref>{{cite news|accessdate=2008-02-29|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,836219,00.html|title=Declaration of Independence |publisher=]|date=1966-08-19|author= }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-29|url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/GA04Dg01.html|title=Seoul's double-talk on reunification |publisher=]|date=2005-01-04|author=Scofield, David }}</ref>
|- |-
| {{flag|South Korea}} ! scope=row | {{flag|Sovereign Military Order of Malta}}
| 1113
| South Korea, independent since 1948, is currently not recognized by one UN member, ].
| The {{Anchor|Sovereign Military Order of Malta}}] (SMOM) is considered a ] non-state entity, as it claims neither statehood nor territory.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://analitica.com/opinion/opinion-nacional/la-orden-de-malta-y-su-naturaleza-juridica/|title= La Orden de Malta y su Naturaleza Jurídica|date= 1 May 1999|publisher= ]|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150801044650/http://analitica.com/opinion/opinion-nacional/la-orden-de-malta-y-su-naturaleza-juridica/|archive-date= 1 August 2015|url-status= live|access-date= 1 August 2015}} ] "The Order of Malta, within the limits that are compatible with its actual position as a subject deprived of territory, is in the international community, a sovereign entity on par with the States, and the Prince Grand Master is comparable, from the point of view of international law, to the Heads of State."</ref><ref> "The admission of Order of Malta to the United Nations also further solidified its legally recognized sovereignty ..."</ref><ref>Shaw, Malcolm Nathan ''International Law'' Fifth Edition Cambridge University Press 2003 {{ISBN|0-521-82473-7}} p. 218 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230413151856/https://www.amazon.com/International-Law-Malcolm-N-Shaw/dp/0521824737/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1351263623&sr=1-1&keywords=0521824737 |date=13 April 2023 }}, "The Italian Court of Cassation in 1935 recognised the international personality of the Order, noting that 'the modern theory of the subjects of international law recognises a number of collective units whose composition is independent of the nationality of their constituent members and whose scope transcends by virtue of their universal character the territorial confines of any single state.' (''Nanni v. Pace and the Sovereign Order of Malta'' 8 AD, p. 2.)"</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9LDb9lFYjVPMkNwdTBGeVk1T3c/view | title=Reconócese a la Soberana Orden Militar de Malta como Entidad Internacionál Independiente | work=Boletín Oficiál de la República Argentina, Año LIX, Número 16.92 | date=19 June 1951 | location=Buenos Aires | page=1 | access-date=11 February 2016 | archive-date=12 March 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160312091148/https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9LDb9lFYjVPMkNwdTBGeVk1T3c/view | url-status=live }} "The Senate and Chamber of Deputies of Argentina, in Congress assembled, enact as LAW: Article 1 – The Sovereign Military Order of Malta is hereby recognized as an international independent entity."</ref><!--<ref>Knol </ref>{{citation broken|date=October 2012}}--><ref name="Arocha">{{cite web| url= https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9LDb9lFYjVPUnFkaUVjVVdVUnM/view?usp=sharing| publisher=Analítica.com| location=Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela| access-date=1 October 2012| last=Arocha|first=Magaly | title= La Orden de Malta y su Naturaleza Jurídica (The Order of Malta and Its Legal Nature) | date=May 1999|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150801044650/http://analitica.com/opinion/opinion-nacional/la-orden-de-malta-y-su-naturaleza-juridica/|archive-date= 1 August 2015|url-status= live}} ] "he clear territorial separation of sovereign areas that exists between the Italian State and the State of Vatican City does not exist between the Order of Malta and the Italian State, but neither can it be said that the treatment given to the headquarters of the Order (Aventine, Via Condotti) is, simply, that reserved for the headquarters of diplomatic missions accredited to the Italian State. In fact, the headquarters of the Order have diplomatic extraterritoriality (authoritarian acts of any kind – executive, acts of inspection, judicial – cannot take place inside), but in addition, the Italian State recognizes the exercise, in the headquarters, of the prerogatives of sovereignty. This means that Italian sovereignty and Maltese sovereignty coexist without overlapping, because the Order exercises sovereign functions in a wider area than occurs in the diplomatic missions of the States for, although enjoy extraterritoriality, the guarantees deriving from the privilege of immunity are constrained to a purely administrative area; the Order, instead, makes use of extraterritoriality to meet the very acts of sovereign self-determination that are the same as the States (legislative, judicial, administrative, financial acts)."</ref> First ] by ] in 1113, it has established ] ],<ref>The Sovereign Military Order of Malta maintains ] and receives ].</ref> and also maintains diplomatic relations with the ], the ], and the ].<ref>{{cite web | title=Bilateral relations | website=Sovereign Order of Malta | date=5 April 2023 | url=https://www.orderofmalta.int/diplomatic-activities/bilateral-relations/ | access-date=22 April 2023 | archive-date=25 June 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625205913/https://www.orderofmalta.int/diplomatic-activities/bilateral-relations/ | url-status=live }}</ref> Additionally, it participates in the United Nations as an ]. Some states, such as ], recognize SMOM as a sovereign state, rather than a sovereign subject of international law.<ref>{{cite book|last=Cansacchi|first=Giorgio|title=Il diritto di legazione attivo e passivo dell'Ordine de Malta|date=1940|page=65}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Astraudo|first=A.|title=Saint-marin et l'Ordre de Malta|date=1935|journal=La Revue Diplomatique|volume=7}}</ref><ref>Cox, Noel S.B., The Continuing Question of Sovereignty and the Sovereign Military Order of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta (June 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1140462 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230413151900/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1140462 |date=13 April 2023 }} or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1140462 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230413151902/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1140462 |date=13 April 2023 }}</ref> Italy's ] decreed on 6 June 1974 that SMOM "constitutes a sovereign international subject, in all terms equal, even if without territory, to a foreign state with which Italy has normal diplomatic relations".<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://swab.zlibcdn.com/dtoken/d9b09dd57910bda736e1e1045ece596b/23164645.pdf |title=Corte Suprema di Cassazione; Sezioni unite civili; sentenza 6 giugno 1974, n. 1653 |journal=Il Foro Italiano |volume=98 |issue=6 |date=June 1975 |pages=1471/1472–1475/1476 |access-date=10 April 2022 |archive-date=12 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512200027/https://swab.zlibcdn.com/dtoken/d9b09dd57910bda736e1e1045ece596b/23164645.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> As Italy recognizes, in addition to ], SMOM sovereignty within its headquarters in Italy, Italian and SMOM sovereignty uniquely coexist without overlapping.<ref name="Arocha"/>
| {{flag|North Korea}} claims to be the sole legitimate government of ].
| style="text-align:center;"| None
| ]
| Foreign ], missions (], ])
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-28|url=http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/8.htm|date=2000-10-07|author=US Library of Congress|title=World War II and Korea |publisher=Country Studies }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2008-02-29|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F01EFD71538F930A3575AC0A962958260|title=China, Backing North Korea, Quits Armistice Commission |publisher=The New York Times|date=1994-09-03|author=Sterngold, James}}</ref>
|} |}
<small>{{note|a|a}}Both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China ], stating ] is ''de jure'' a single sovereign entity encompassing both the area currently controlled by the PRC and the area currently controlled by the ROC.</small>
<!-- Liechtenstein and Slovakia recognize each other, do not re-add them. See these two refs: <ref>http://88.82.102.51/fileadmin/_pm.liechtenstein.li/en/091209_Beziehungen_SKFL_en.pdf</ref> and <ref>http://www.foreign.gov.sk/servlet/content?MT=/App/WCM/main.nsf/vw_ByID/ID_C0B1D004B5A332B2C1257627003301E7_EN&OpenDocument=Y&LANG=EN&TG=BlankMaster&URL=/App/WCM/Aktualit.nsf/%28vw_ByID%29/ID_BF0B03202F307E79C1257693005B22FD</ref> -->

== Unofficial relations ==

Some states maintain informal (officially non-diplomatic) relations with states that do not officially recognize them. The ] (]) is one such state, as it maintains unofficial relations with many other states through its ], which allow regular consular services. This allows the ROC to have economic relations even with states that do not formally recognise it. A total of 56 states, including Germany,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Laenderinformationen/LaenderReiseinformationenA-Z.jsp |title=Germany - Countries A to Z |publisher=Auswaertiges-amt.de |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref> Italy,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.esteri.it/MAE/IT/Ministero/Rappresentanze/?Cod=3450102 |title=Ministero degli Affari Esteri - Rappresentanze - Ambasciate Consolati e Uffici di promozione |publisher=Esteri.it |date= |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref> the United States,<ref></ref> and the United Kingdom,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/find-an-embassy/?l=T |title=Find an Embassy |publisher=Fco.gov.uk |date=2008-03-14 |accessdate=2010-06-25}}</ref> maintain some form of unofficial mission in the ROC.


== Excluded entities == == Excluded entities ==
* Subnational entities and regions that function as ''de facto'' independent states, with the central government exercising little or no control over their territory, but that do not explicitly claim to be independent. Examples include ] in ],<ref name="Varming 2017 pp. 8–14">{{cite tech report | last=Varming | first=Kirstine Strøh | title=THE EXPERIENTIAL LIMITS OF THE STATE: TERRITORY AND TAXATION IN GAROOWE, PUNTLAND | year=2017 | jstor=resrep13400.6 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep13400.6 | access-date=18 December 2023 | page=8–14 | quote=This is important to consider, when discussing statehood in Puntland state, as in many ways, it functions as an independent state very much like the self-declared Republic of Somaliland.}}</ref><ref name="Africanews 2023">{{cite web | last=Africanews | first=Rédaction | title=Somalia: Puntland state dissociates itself from Mogadishu | website=Africanews | date=11 January 2023 | url=https://www.africanews.com/2023/01/11/somalia-puntland-state-dissociates-itself-from-mogadishu// | access-date=18 December 2023 | archive-date=18 December 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231218144324/https://www.africanews.com/2023/01/11/somalia-puntland-state-dissociates-itself-from-mogadishu// | url-status=live }}</ref> the ] in ],<ref name="Brown 2012">{{cite web | last=Brown | first=Nathan J. | title=Gaza Five Years On: Hamas Settles In | website=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace | date=11 June 2012 | url=https://carnegieendowment.org/2012/06/11/gaza-five-years-on-hamas-settles-in-pub-48470 | access-date=18 December 2023 | archive-date=3 May 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230503072817/https://carnegieendowment.org/2012/06/11/gaza-five-years-on-hamas-settles-in-pub-48470 | url-status=live }}</ref> the ] in ],<ref name="Jüde 2017 pp. 847–863">{{cite journal | last=Jüde | first=Johannes | title=Contesting borders? The formation of Iraqi Kurdistan's de facto state | journal=International Affairs | volume=93 | issue=4 | date=2017 | issn=0020-5850 | doi=10.1093/ia/iix125 | pages=847–863}}</ref> ] in ]<ref name="Hond 2017">{{cite web | first1=Mireille | last1=Court | first2=Chris | last2=Den Hond | title=Experiment in self-rule in Rojava | website=Le Monde diplomatique | date=1 September 2017 | url=https://mondediplo.com/2017/09/05Rojava | access-date=18 December 2023 | archive-date=18 December 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231218144324/https://mondediplo.com/2017/09/05Rojava | url-status=live }}</ref> and the ] in ].<ref name="Kumbun">{{cite news |last1=Kumbun |first1=Joe |title=Protected by China, Wa Is Now a de Facto Independent State |url=https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/guest-column/protected-by-china-wa-is-now-a-de-facto-independent-state.html |access-date=11 September 2022 |work=The Irrawaddy |date=23 April 2019 |archive-date=29 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221129114041/https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/guest-column/protected-by-china-wa-is-now-a-de-facto-independent-state.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

* ] that have ] and exert some control over territory, but that reliable sources do not describe as meeting the threshold of a sovereign state under international law. Examples include ], the ] and the ]; see ] for a more complete list of such groups.
* ] The ] is a sovereign subject of international law that is currently recognized as such by 110 UN member states and the ], through the establishment of diplomatic or "official" relations. The order participates in the United Nations as an international organization with permanent observer status. However, it is a non-territorial entity and as such does not define itself as a state.<ref>http://www.un.int/orderofmalta/orderun2.html</ref><ref>http://books.google.com/books?id=cc3XzkFt-IUC&pg=PA218&dq=order+of+malta&lr=&cd=1#v=onepage&q=order%20of%20malta&f=false</ref><ref>asamblea.racsa.co.cr/proyecto/15300/15333.doc</ref><ref>http://www.glin.gov/view.action?glinID=108478</ref><ref>http://www.newera.com.na/article.php?articleid=2473</ref><ref>http://knol.google.com/k/orden-de-malta#</ref><ref>http://www.analitica.com/vam/1999.05/sociedad/01.htm</ref>
* Those areas undergoing current ] and other situations with problems over government succession, regardless of temporary alignment with ] (e.g. by receiving recognition as state or legitimate government), where the conflict is still in its active phase, the situation is too rapidly changing and no relatively stable ]s have emerged yet.
* By definition, the list does not include ] who exercise varying degrees of de facto sovereignty over the areas under their control, but either live in societies that cannot be defined as states or whose status as such are currently too data deficient to be definitively known.
* Those of the current ] and ] that do not satisfy ] by simultaneously not satisfying the declarative theory and not having been recognised as a state or legitimate government by any other state.
* Entities considered to be ] are not included. Even though micronations generally claim to be sovereign and independent, it is often up to debate whether a micronation truly controls its claimed territory. Micronations are usually not considered of geopolitical relevance. For a complete list, see ].
* Entities considered to be ]s, even if they are recognised by another micronation. Even though micronations generally claim to be sovereign and independent, it is often debatable whether a micronation truly controls its claimed territory.{{efn|name=Micronation2|It is far from certain that micronations, which are generally of minuscule size, have sovereign control over their claimed territories, contrasted with the mere disregard and indifference toward micronations' assertions by the states from which they allege to have seceded. By not deeming such declarations (and other acts of the micronation) important enough to react in any way, these states generally consider micronations to be private property and their claims as unofficial private announcements of individuals, who remain subject to the laws of the states in which their properties are located.<ref name="Cambridge University Press 2021 pp. 162–200">{{cite book | title=Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty | chapter=State Responses | publisher=Cambridge University Press | date=31 December 2021 | doi=10.1017/9781009150132.006 | pages=162–200| isbn=9781009150132 | s2cid=245453022 }}</ref>}} For this reason, micronations are usually not considered of geopolitical relevance. For a list of micronations, see ].
* ] who live in ] or whose statuses as such are not definitively known.
* Some states can be slow to establish relations with new UN member states and thus do not explicitly recognise them, despite having no dispute and sometimes favorable relations. These are excluded from the list. Examples include ]<ref name="RecogHRV">{{cite web|url=https://mvep.gov.hr/foreign-policy/bilateral-relations/date-of-recognition-and-establishment-od-diplomatic-relations/22800|title=Date of Recognition and Establishment od Diplomatic Relations|website=mvep.gov.hr|publisher=]|access-date=1 March 2022|archive-date=28 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220928182827/https://mvep.gov.hr/foreign-policy/bilateral-relations/date-of-recognition-and-establishment-od-diplomatic-relations/22800|url-status=live}}</ref> and ].<ref name="RecogMNE">{{cite web|url=http://www.mip.gov.me/en/index.php/Bilateral/dates-of-recognition-and-establishment-of-diplomatic-relations.html|title=Dates of Recognition and Establishment of Diplomatic Relations|website=mip.gov.me|publisher=]|access-date=1 March 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130517185051/http://www.mip.gov.me/en/index.php/Bilateral/dates-of-recognition-and-establishment-of-diplomatic-relations.html|archive-date=17 May 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref>


== See also == == See also ==
{{portal|Countries|Politics}}
* ] (the establishment of many states with limited recognition is caused by a civil war)
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
** ]
* ]
*** ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] ** ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]

* ]
== Notes ==
* ]
{{notelist}}


== References == == References ==
{{reflist}}


== Further reading ==
{{refs|2}}
{{refbegin}}
* Adrian Florea, "]." International Studies Quarterly, Volume 61, Issue 2, June 2017, Pages 337–351
*{{cite journal|title=Rebel governance in de facto states|last1=Florea|first1=Adrian|date=6 May 2020|journal=]|volume=26|issue=4|pages=1004–1031|publisher=]|doi=10.1177/1354066120919481|s2cid=53365477|doi-access=free}}
*{{cite book | last = Geldenhuys | first = Deon | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Sa2HDAAAQBAJ | title = Contested States in World Politics | year = 2009 | publisher = Palgrave Macmillan | isbn = 978-0-230-23418-5 | access-date = 16 October 2017 | archive-date = 16 June 2024 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240616061554/https://books.google.com/books?id=Sa2HDAAAQBAJ | url-status = live }}
* {{cite book |last=Keating |first=Joshua |year=2018 |title=Invisible Countries: Journeys to the Edge of Nationhood |publisher=Yale |isbn=978-0-300-22162-6}}
* {{cite book | last = Ker-Lindsay | first = James | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=4PwmeRG9QsUC | title = The Foreign Policy of Counter Secession: Preventing the Recognition of Contested States | edition = 1st | location = Oxford | year = 2012 | publisher = Oxford University Press | isbn = 9780199698394 | access-date = 13 August 2015 | archive-date = 15 January 2023 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230115130621/https://books.google.com/books?id=4PwmeRG9QsUC | url-status = live }}
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210131194727/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/issue/special-issue-on-the-emergence-and-resilience-of-parastates/643F832C3E7BDA842E6C7C8E846DA29E |date=31 January 2021 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Wertz |first1=Daniel |last2=Oh |first2=JJ |last3=Kim |first3=Insung |date=August 2016 |title=Issue Brief: DPRK Diplomatic Relations |publisher=The National Committee on North Korea |url=http://www.ncnk.org/resources/publications/NCNK_Issue_Brief_DPRK_Diplomatic_Relations.pdf |access-date=19 January 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161228074114/http://www.ncnk.org/resources/publications/NCNK_Issue_Brief_DPRK_Diplomatic_Relations.pdf |archive-date=28 December 2016 }}
{{refend}}


{{States with limited recognition}}
{{featured list}}


{{interwiki extra|qid=Q15634554}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:List Of States With Limited Recognition}}

]
] ]

]

{{Link FL|id}}
{{Link FL|ro}}

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 21:14, 10 December 2024

Not to be confused with Micronations. "Disputed states" redirects here. For a list of territorial disputes including these, see List of territorial disputes.

  UN member states that at least one other UN member state does not recognise   Non-UN member states recognised by at least one UN member state   Non-UN member states recognised only by other non-UN member states or not recognized by any other state

A number of polities have declared independence and sought diplomatic recognition from the international community as sovereign states, but have not been universally recognised as such. These entities often have de facto control of their territory. A number of such entities have existed in the past.

There are two traditional theories used to indicate how a sovereign state comes into being. The declarative theory (codified in the 1933 Montevideo Convention) defines a state as a person in international law if it meets the following criteria:

  1. a defined territory
  2. a permanent population
  3. a government, and
  4. a capacity to enter into relations with other states.

According to the declarative theory, an entity's statehood is independent of its recognition by other states. By contrast, the constitutive theory defines a state as a person of international law only if it is recognised as such by other states that are already a member of the international community.

Quasi-states often reference either or both doctrines in order to legitimise their claims to statehood. There are, for example, entities which meet the declarative criteria (with de facto partial or complete control over their claimed territory, a government and a permanent population), but whose statehood is not recognised by any other states. Non-recognition is often a result of conflicts with other countries that claim those entities as integral parts of their territory. In other cases, two or more partially recognised states may claim the same territorial area, with each of them de facto in control of a portion of it (for example, North Korea and South Korea, or the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the People's Republic of China). Entities that are recognised by only a minority of the world's states usually reference the declarative doctrine to legitimise their claims.

In many situations, international non-recognition is influenced by the presence of a foreign military force in the territory of the contested entity, making the description of the country's de facto status problematic. The international community can judge this military presence too intrusive, reducing the entity to a puppet state where effective sovereignty is retained by the foreign power. Historical cases in this sense can be seen in Japanese-led Manchukuo or the German-created Slovak Republic and Independent State of Croatia before and during World War II. In the 1996 case Loizidou v. Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights judged Turkey for having exercised authority in the territory of Northern Cyprus.

There are also entities that do not have control over any territory or do not unequivocally meet the declarative criteria for statehood but have been recognised to exist as sovereign entities by at least one other state. Historically, this has happened in the case of the Holy See (1870–1929); Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania (during Soviet annexation); and Palestine at the time of its declaration of independence in 1988. The Sovereign Military Order of Malta is currently in this position. See list of governments in exile for unrecognised governments without control over the territory claimed.

Criteria for inclusion

Further information: Country § Statehood

State practice relating to the recognition of a country typically falls somewhere between the declarative theory and constitutive theory approaches.

The criteria for inclusion on this list are limited to polities that claim sovereignty, lack recognition from at least one UN member state, and either:

  • satisfy the declarative theory of statehood, or
  • are recognised (constitutive theory) as a state by at least one UN member state.

Background

Women in Somaliland wearing the colors of the Somaliland flag

There are 193 United Nations (UN) member states, while both the Holy See and Palestine have observer state status in the United Nations. However, some countries that fulfill the declarative criteria, are recognised by the large majority of other states and are members of the United Nations are still included in the list here because one or more other states do not recognise their statehood, due to territorial claims or other conflicts.

Some states maintain informal (officially non-diplomatic) relations with states that do not officially recognise them. Taiwan (the Republic of China) is one such state, as it maintains unofficial relations with many other states through its Economic and Cultural Offices, which allow regular consular services. This allows Taiwan to have economic relations even with states that do not formally recognise it. A total of 56 states, including Germany, Italy, the United States, and the United Kingdom, maintain some form of unofficial mission in Taiwan. Kosovo, Northern Cyprus, Abkhazia, Transnistria, the Sahrawi Republic, Somaliland, and Palestine also host informal diplomatic missions, and/or maintain special delegations or other informal missions abroad.

States that are state parties within the United Nations System

UN member states not recognised by at least one UN member state
Name Declared Status Other claimants Further information
 Armenia 1991 Armenia, independent since 1991, is not recognised by one UN member, Pakistan, which has a position of supporting Azerbaijan since the First Nagorno-Karabakh War. None Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
 China 1949 The People's Republic of China (PRC), proclaimed in 1949, is the more widely recognised of the two claimant governments of China, the other being Taiwan (the Republic of China). The United Nations recognised the ROC as the sole representative of China until 1971, when it decided to give this recognition to the PRC instead (see United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758). The PRC and the ROC do not recognise each other's statehood, and each enforces its own version of the One China policy meaning that no state can recognise both of them at the same time. The states that recognise the ROC (11 UN members and the Holy See as of 15 January 2024) regard it as the sole legitimate government of China and therefore do not recognise the PRC.  Taiwan (the Republic of China) considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of all of China, and therefore claims exclusive sovereignty over all territory controlled by the PRC. See also: One China. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
PRC's diplomatic relations dates of establishment
 Cyprus 1960 The Republic of Cyprus, independent since 1960, is not recognised by one UN member (Turkey) and one non-UN member (Northern Cyprus), due to the ongoing civil dispute over the island. Turkey does not accept the Republic's rule over the whole island and refers to it as the "Greek Administration of Southern Cyprus".  Northern Cyprus claims the northeastern portion of the island of Cyprus. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
 Israel 1948 Israel, founded in 1948, is not recognised by 28 UN members. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which enjoys majority international recognition as sole representative of the Palestinian people, recognised Israel in 1993. In January 2018 and October 2018, the Palestinian Central Council voted to suspend recognition of Israel, but this position has yet to be acted upon by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.  Palestine considers itself to be the legitimate government of the West Bank, which is under Israeli occupation, and the Gaza Strip.
 Syria considers itself to be the legitimate government of the Golan Heights, a territory which Israel controls and claims with limited recognition.
Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
International recognition
 North Korea 1948 North Korea (officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea), independent since 1948, is not recognised by one UN member, South Korea.  South Korea considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of Korea, and claims all territory controlled by North Korea. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
 South Korea 1948 South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea), independent since 1948, is not recognised by one UN member, North Korea.  North Korea considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of Korea, and claims all territory controlled by South Korea. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
UN General Assembly observer states not recognised by at least one UN member state
Name Declared Status Other claimants Further information
 Palestine 1988 Israel gained control of the Palestinian territories as a result of the Six-Day War in 1967, but has never formally annexed them. The State of Palestine (commonly known as Palestine) was declared in 1988 by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which is recognised by a majority of UN member states and the UN itself as the sole representative of the Palestinian people. Since the end of the first Palestinian Intifada against Israel the Israeli government has gradually moved its armed forces and settlers out of certain parts of Palestine's claimed territory, while still maintaining varying degrees of control over most of it. The Palestinian National Authority (PNA), which performs limited internal government functions over certain areas of Palestine, was established in 1994. The 2007 split between the Fatah and Hamas political parties resulted in competing governments claiming to represent the PNA and Palestine, with Fatah exercising authority exclusively over the West Bank and enjoying majority recognition from UN member states, and a separate Hamas leadership exercising authority exclusively over the Gaza area (except for a short period from 2014 to 2016). Palestine is currently officially recognised as a state by 146 UN member states, the Holy See, and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. The remaining UN member states, including Israel, do not recognise the State of Palestine. The United Nations designates the claimed Palestinian territories as "occupied" by Israel, and accorded Palestine non-member observer state status in 2012 (see United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/19). Palestine also has membership in the Arab League, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and UNESCO.  Israel regards the area claimed by Palestine as "disputed" territory (that is, territory not legally belonging to any state). Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
International recognition, Israeli–Palestinian peace process, History of the State of Palestine
UN specialized agency member states not recognised by at least one UN member state
Name Declared Status Other claimants Further information
 Cook Islands 1965 The Cook Islands became a state in free association with New Zealand in 1965. Although the Cook Islands are fully self-governing and behave as a sovereign state in international law, their constitutional status is different from that of a fully independent state, considering that all Cook Islands nationals are New Zealand citizens, and the country's head of state is the Monarch of New Zealand. As of 2015, the Cook Islands had established diplomatic relations with 43 states, while the number as of May 2024 is at least 63 UN member states, as well as the Holy See, Kosovo, Niue and the European Union. Some countries establishing diplomatic relations such as the United States have recognized the Cook Islands as a fully sovereign state, while some such as France have not. The Cook Islands are a member of nine United Nations specialized agencies, and the United Nations currently classifies the Cook Islands as a "non-member state", a category unique only to it and Niue. State in free association with
 New Zealand, considered by some as having no sovereignty.
Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
Political status
 Kosovo 2008 Kosovo declared its independence in 2008. It is currently recognised by 104 UN members, Taiwan, the Cook Islands and Niue. 10 other UN members have recognised Kosovo and subsequently withdrawn recognition. The United Nations, as stipulated in Security Council Resolution 1244, has administered the territory since 1999 through the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, with cooperation from the European Union since 2008. Kosovo is a member of two United Nations specialized agencies (the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group), as well as the Venice Commission, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the International Olympic Committee, among others.  Serbia claims Kosovo as part of its sovereign territory. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
International recognition; Political status
 Niue 1974 Niue became a state in free association with New Zealand in 1974 after a constitutional referendum. Although Niue is fully self-governing and behaves as a sovereign state in international law, its constitutional status is different from that of a fully independent state, considering that all Niue nationals are New Zealand citizens, and the country's head of state is the Monarch of New Zealand. As of April 2023, Niue has established diplomatic relations with at least 26 UN member states, as well as the Cook Islands and the European Union. Niue is a member of eight United Nations specialized agencies, and the United Nations currently classifies Niue as a "non-member state", a category unique only to it and the Cook Islands. State in free association with
 New Zealand, considered by some as having no sovereignty.
Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
Political status

States that are not state parties within the United Nations System

Non-UN member states recognised by at least one UN member state
Name Declared Status Other claimants Further information
 Abkhazia 1999 Abkhazia declared its independence in 1999. It is currently recognised by 5 UN member states (Russia, Syria, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Nauru), and two non-UN member states (South Ossetia and Transnistria). Two additional UN member states (Tuvalu and Vanuatu) had recognised Abkhazia, but subsequently withdrew their recognition.  Georgia claims Abkhazia as part of its sovereign territory. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
International recognition
 Northern Cyprus 1983 Northern Cyprus declared its independence in 1983 with its official name being the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" (TRNC). It is recognised by one UN member, Turkey. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Economic Cooperation Organization have granted Northern Cyprus observer status under the name "Turkish Cypriot State". United Nations Security Council Resolution 541 defines the declaration of independence of Northern Cyprus as legally invalid. The International Court of Justice stated in its advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence in 2010 that "the Security Council in an exceptional character attached illegality to the DOI of TRNC because it was, or would have been connected with the unlawful use of force".  Cyprus claims the TRNC as part of its sovereign territory. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
Cyprus dispute
 Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic 1976 Morocco invaded and annexed most of Western Sahara, forcing Spain to withdraw from the territory in 1975. In 1976, the Polisario Front declared the independence of Western Sahara as the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR). The SADR is largely a government in exile located in Algeria, which claims the entire territory of Western Sahara, but controls only a small fraction of it. The SADR is recognised by 46 UN member states and South Ossetia. 38 other UN member states have recognised the SADR but subsequently retracted or suspended recognition, pending the outcome of a referendum on self-determination. The remaining UN member states, including Morocco, have never recognised the SADR. The SADR is a member of the African Union. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 34/37 recognised the right of the Western Sahara people to self-determination and recognised also the Polisario Front as the representative of the Western Sahara people. Western Sahara is listed on the United Nations list of non-self-governing territories. Other than Morocco and the United States, no state officially recognises Morocco's annexation of Western Sahara, but some states support the Moroccan autonomy plan. The Arab League supports Morocco's claim over the entire territory of Western Sahara.  Morocco claims Western Sahara (including the area controlled by the SADR) as part of its sovereign territory. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
International recognition; Political status
 South Ossetia 1992 South Ossetia declared its independence in 1992. It is currently recognised by 5 UN member states (Russia, Syria, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Nauru), and three non-UN member states (Abkhazia, Transnistria and Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic). One additional UN member state (Tuvalu) had recognised South Ossetia, but subsequently withdrew its recognition.  Georgia claims South Ossetia as part of its sovereign territory. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
International recognition
 Taiwan 1912/1949 Taiwan (formally known as the Republic of China), enjoyed majority recognition as the sole government of China until roughly the late 1950s/1960s, when a majority of UN member states started to gradually switch recognition to the People's Republic of China (PRC). The United Nations itself recognised the ROC as the sole representative of China until 1971, when it decided to give this recognition to the PRC instead (see United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758). The ROC and PRC do not recognise each other's statehood, and each enforces its own version of the One China policy meaning that no state can recognise both of them at the same time. The ROC is currently recognised by 11 UN members and the Holy See. All remaining UN member states, as well as the Cook Islands and Niue, recognise the PRC instead of the ROC and either accept the PRC's territorial claim over Taiwan or take a non-committal position on Taiwan's status. A significant number of PRC-recognising UN member states, as well as the Republic of Somaliland, nonetheless conduct officially non-diplomatic relations with the ROC, designating it as either "Taipei" or "Taiwan". Since the early 1990s, the ROC has sought separate United Nations membership under a variety of names, including "Taiwan". The  People's Republic of China considers itself to be the sole legitimate government of all of China, and therefore claims exclusive sovereignty over all territory controlled by Taiwan. See also: One China. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
Political status
Non-UN member states recognised only by other non-UN member states
Name Declared Status Other claimants Further information
 Transnistria 1990 Transnistria (officially the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic) declared its independence in 1990. It is recognised by two non-UN members: Abkhazia and South Ossetia.  Moldova claims Transnistria as part of its sovereign territory. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)
International recognition, Political status
Non-UN member states not recognized by any other state
Name Declared Status Other claimants Further information
 Somaliland 1991 Somaliland declared its independence in 1991. It claims to be the legal successor to the State of Somaliland, a short lived sovereign state that existed from 26 June 1960 (when the British Somaliland Protectorate gained full independence from the United Kingdom) to 1 July 1960 (when the State of Somaliland united with Somalia to form the Somali Republic). It is not officially recognised by any state, though it maintains unofficial relations with several UN member states and the Republic of China (Taiwan). Taiwan and Somaliland have mutual representative offices in each other's countries, similarly to how Taiwan conducts relations with other countries that do not recognize it. On 1 January 2024, Ethiopia and Somaliland signed a memorandum of understanding giving Ethiopia access to the Red Sea via the port of Berbera in return for a potential recognition.  Somalia claims Somaliland as part of its sovereign territory. Foreign relations, missions (of, to)

Other entities with limited recognition of sovereignty

Political entities recognised as sovereign by at least one UN member state
Name Declared Status Other claimants Further information
 Sovereign Military Order of Malta 1113 The Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) is considered a sovereign non-state entity, as it claims neither statehood nor territory. First recognized as sovereign by Pope Paschal II in 1113, it has established full diplomatic relations with 113 UN member states as a sovereign subject of international law, and also maintains diplomatic relations with the European Union, the Holy See, and the State of Palestine. Additionally, it participates in the United Nations as an observer entity. Some states, such as San Marino, recognize SMOM as a sovereign state, rather than a sovereign subject of international law. Italy's Supreme Court of Cassation decreed on 6 June 1974 that SMOM "constitutes a sovereign international subject, in all terms equal, even if without territory, to a foreign state with which Italy has normal diplomatic relations". As Italy recognizes, in addition to extraterritoriality, SMOM sovereignty within its headquarters in Italy, Italian and SMOM sovereignty uniquely coexist without overlapping. None Foreign relations, missions (of, to)

Excluded entities

  • Subnational entities and regions that function as de facto independent states, with the central government exercising little or no control over their territory, but that do not explicitly claim to be independent. Examples include Puntland in Somalia, the Gaza Strip in Palestine, the Kurdistan Region in Iraq, Rojava in Syria and the Wa State in Myanmar.
  • Rebel groups that have declared independence and exert some control over territory, but that reliable sources do not describe as meeting the threshold of a sovereign state under international law. Examples include Ambazonia, the Houthi movement and the Southern Movement; see list of rebel groups that control territory for a more complete list of such groups.
  • Those areas undergoing current civil wars and other situations with problems over government succession, regardless of temporary alignment with the inclusion criteria (e.g. by receiving recognition as state or legitimate government), where the conflict is still in its active phase, the situation is too rapidly changing and no relatively stable quasi-states have emerged yet.
  • Those of the current irredentist movements and governments in exile that do not satisfy the inclusion criteria by simultaneously not satisfying the declarative theory and not having been recognised as a state or legitimate government by any other state.
  • Entities considered to be micronations, even if they are recognised by another micronation. Even though micronations generally claim to be sovereign and independent, it is often debatable whether a micronation truly controls its claimed territory. For this reason, micronations are usually not considered of geopolitical relevance. For a list of micronations, see list of micronations.
  • Uncontacted peoples who live in societies that cannot be defined as states or whose statuses as such are not definitively known.
  • Some states can be slow to establish relations with new UN member states and thus do not explicitly recognise them, despite having no dispute and sometimes favorable relations. These are excluded from the list. Examples include Croatia and Montenegro.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China officially claim to represent the whole of China, stating China is a single sovereign entity encompassing both the area controlled by the PRC and the area controlled by the ROC. Neither the PRC nor the ROC officially recognise each other's claim to statehood, and they compete for diplomatic recognition as the only legitimate representative of China among other states. Historically, both the PRC and the ROC have broken off diplomatic relations with any state engaging in diplomatic relations or claiming to recognise the other, though the ROC has in some instances accepted dual recognition since it transitioned to democracy in the 1990s. However, as of 2021 no state officially recognises both the ROC and the PRC.
  2. ^ Israel allows the PNA to execute some functions in the Palestinian territories, depending on special area classification. Israel maintains minimal interference (retaining control of borders: air, sea beyond internal waters, land) in the Gaza Strip (its interior and Egypt portion of the land border are under Hamas control), maximum in "Area C" and varying degrees of interference elsewhere. See also Israeli-occupied territories.
  3. It is far from certain that micronations, which are generally of minuscule size, have sovereign control over their claimed territories, contrasted with the mere disregard and indifference toward micronations' assertions by the states from which they allege to have seceded. By not deeming such declarations (and other acts of the micronation) important enough to react in any way, these states generally consider micronations to be private property and their claims as unofficial private announcements of individuals, who remain subject to the laws of the states in which their properties are located.

References

  1. Grant, Thomas D., The recognition of states: law and practice in debate and evolution (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1999), chapter 1.
  2. Lauterpacht, Hersch (2012). Recognition in International Law. Cambridge University Press. p. 64. ISBN 9781107609433. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
  3. "Introduction: The Strange Endurance of De Facto States". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 3 December 2018. Retrieved 12 October 2023.
  4. Grzybowski, Janis (2017). "To Be or Not to Be: The Ontological Predicament of State Creation in International Law". European Journal of International Law. 28 (2). Oxford University Press (OUP): 409–432. doi:10.1093/ejil/chx031. ISSN 0938-5428.
  5. Lemkin, Raphaël (2008) . Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-58477-901-8. Retrieved 30 June 2019. The creation of puppet states or of puppet governments does not give them any special status under international law in the occupied territory. Therefore the puppet governments and puppet states have no greater rights in the occupied territory than the occupant himself. Their actions should be considered as actions of the occupant and hence subject to the limitations of the Hague Regulations.
  6. Middlebush, Frederick A. (1934). "The Effect of the Non-Recognition of Manchukuo". American Political Science Review. 28 (4). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 677–683. doi:10.2307/1947199. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 1947199. S2CID 147030868.
  7. Rudolf, Beate (1997). "Loizidou v. Turkey (Merits)". American Journal of International Law. 91 (3). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 532–537. doi:10.2307/2954189. ISSN 0002-9300. JSTOR 2954189. S2CID 228739345.
  8. Mälksoo, Lauri (2003). Illegal annexation and state continuity: the case of the incorporation of the Baltic states by the USSR. M. Nijhoff Publishers. p. 76. ISBN 978-90-411-2177-6. Archived from the original on 17 January 2023. Retrieved 12 October 2023. incorporation into the Soviet Union in 1940 took place against the will of the population, and was never recognised de jure by most countries
  9. Daraghmeh, Mohammed (21 May 2018). "Palestinian official suggests a Kosovo-like declaration of independence". Statesboro Herald. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
  10. Shaw, Malcolm Nathan (2003). International law (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 369. ISBN 978-0-521-53183-2.
  11. Cohen, Rosalyn (1961). "The Concept of Statehood in United Nations Practice". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 109 (8): 1127–1171. doi:10.2307/3310588. ISSN 0041-9907. JSTOR 3310588. S2CID 56273534. Archived from the original on 19 January 2024. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  12. Kelsen, Hans (1941). "Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations". The American Journal of International Law. 35 (4). American Society of International Law: 605–617. doi:10.2307/2192561. ISSN 0002-9300. JSTOR 2192561. S2CID 147309779. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
  13. Lauterpacht, H. (1944). "Recognition of States in International Law". The Yale Law Journal. 53 (3). The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.: 385–458. doi:10.2307/792830. ISSN 0044-0094. JSTOR 792830. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
  14. "Principles of the Recognition of States" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
  15. Bedjaoui, M. (1991). International Law: Achievements and Prospects. Democracy and power. Springer Netherlands. p. 47]. ISBN 978-92-3-102716-1. Archived from the original on 14 November 2022. Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  16. Seguin, Denis (29 July 2011). "What makes a country?". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 24 January 2024. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  17. "Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 January 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
  18. "States, Sovereignty, Treaties". Encyclopædia Britannica. 26 July 1999. Archived from the original on 30 April 2022. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
  19. "Statehood and Recognition". academic.oup.com. Archived from the original on 26 January 2024. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  20. "Non-member State". United Nations. Archived from the original on 9 February 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
  21. "Germany – Countries A to Z". Auswaertiges-amt.de. Archived from the original on 28 July 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
  22. "Ambasciate Consolati e Uffici di promozione". Esteri.it. Retrieved 29 April 2011.
  23. U.S. Department of State Websites of U.S. Embassies, Consulates, and Diplomatic Missions Archived 6 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 3 February 2011
  24. "Find an Embassy". Fco.gov.uk. 14 March 2008. Archived from the original on 26 July 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
  25. "Foreign Missions in Kosovo". Government of Kosovo, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 24 August 2018. Retrieved 4 November 2010.
  26. "Representative Offices Abroad". Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Public Information Office. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 4 November 2010.
  27. ^ "Abkhazia in the system of international relations". Government of Abkhazia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
  28. "Pagina nueva 1". Archived from the original on 10 August 2011.
  29. "Contacts and addresses of the Somaliland Representative Offices around the world". Government of Somaliland. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
  30. "Embassies, Missions, General and Special Delegations of Palestine abroad". WebGaza.net. Archived from the original on 26 June 2011. Retrieved 4 November 2010.
  31. Pakistan Worldview – Report 21 – Visit to Azerbaijan Senate of Pakistan — Senate foreign relations committee, 2008
  32. Nilufer Bakhtiyar: "For Azerbaijan Pakistan does not recognise Armenia as a country" Archived 13 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine 13 September 2006 – Today.Az
  33. "Constitution of the People's Republic of China". International Human Rights Treaties and Documents Database. Archived from the original on 16 January 2000. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  34. ^ Horton, Chris (8 July 2019). "Taiwan's Status Is a Geopolitical Absurdity". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 16 June 2024. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  35. European Parliament Directorate-General External Policies Policy Department "Turkey and the problem of the recognition of Cyprus" Archived 19 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine 20 January 2005 Retrieved 3 February 2011
  36. "Cyprus". CIA World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 28 February 2008. Archived from the original on 9 January 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  37. "Cyprus exists without Turkey's recognition: president". Xinhua News Agency. 1 October 2005. Archived from the original on 13 March 2006. Retrieved 7 March 2008.
  38. European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs "The influence of Turkish military forces on political agenda-setting in Turkey, analysed on the basis of the Cyprus question" Archived 22 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine 18 February 2008 Retrieved 3 February 2011
  39. Government of Israel (14 May 1948). "Declaration of Israel's Independence 1948". Yale University. Archived from the original on 7 January 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  40. United States Congress (5 June 2008). "H. RES. 1249" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 March 2018. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  41. "'Reply' Online Book Chapter 1". Mythsandfacts.org. Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
  42. "Khartoum Resolution". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016.
  43. Government of Israel. "Israel's Diplomatic Missions Abroad: Status of relations". Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 5 May 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2011.
  44. Bachner, Michael. "Top Palestinian body calls for revoking recognition of Israel, nixing agreements". The Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 20 August 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2021.
  45. "PA's Mahmoud Abbas declares suspension of all deals with Israel". Al Jazeera. 26 July 2019. Archived from the original on 15 October 2019. Retrieved 25 November 2019.
  46. "PLO suspends recognition of Israel". Middle East Monitor. 30 October 2018. Archived from the original on 25 April 2019. Retrieved 9 April 2019.
  47. ^ Scofield, David (4 January 2005). "Seoul's double-talk on reunification". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 4 January 2005. Retrieved 29 February 2008.
  48. Da-gyum, Ji; Ji-hyoung, Son (11 July 2023). "Kim Yo-jong's reference to South as 'Republic of Korea' may indicate change". The Korea Herald. Archived from the original on 23 February 2024. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  49. US Library of Congress (7 October 2000). "World War II and Korea". Country Studies. Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  50. Sterngold, James (3 September 1994). "China, Backing North Korea, Quits Armistice Commission". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 5 March 2008. Retrieved 29 February 2008.
  51. ^ Staff writers (20 February 2008). "Palestinians 'may declare state'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 25 August 2011. Retrieved 22 January 2011.:"Saeb Erekat, disagreed arguing that the Palestine Liberation Organisation had already declared independence in 1988. "Now we need real independence, not a declaration. We need real independence by ending the occupation. We are not Kosovo. We are under Israeli occupation and for independence we need to acquire independence".
  52. "International Recognition of the State of Palestine". Official website of the Palestinian National Authority. November 1988. Archived from the original on 10 October 2003.. The PNA has publicly acknowledged recognition from 94 states, including the former Yugoslavia.
  53. "Embassies of Palestine". Webgaza.net. Archived from the original on 26 June 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
  54. Bannoura, Saed (28 August 2011). "124 Out of 193 Countries Recognize Palestinian Independence". IMEMC News. International Middle East Media Center. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2011.
  55. Shelley, Toby (1988). "Spotlight on Morocco". West Africa (3712–3723: 5–31 December). London: West Africa Publishing Company Ltd: 2282. "... the SADR was one of the first countries to recognise the state of Palestine."
  56. Heaney, Christopher. "Committee on Exercise of Inalienable Rights of Palestinian People – GA Resolution (A/RES/73/18)". Archived from the original on 21 September 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
  57. "Palestinians win upgraded UN status by wide margin". BBC News. 29 November 2012. Archived from the original on 30 November 2012. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
  58. "Arab States: Palestine". United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Archived from the original on 4 January 2012. Retrieved 3 December 2011.
  59. "Disputed Territories- Forgotten Facts About the West Bank and Gaza Strip". Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1 February 2003. Archived from the original on 27 February 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
  60. ^ "Israel's control of the airspace and the territorial waters of the Gaza Strip". btselem.org. Archived from the original on 28 June 2014. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  61. "Map of Gaza fishing limits, "security zones"". dissidentvoice.org. December 2009. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  62. Israel's Disengagement Plan: Renewing the Peace Process Archived 3 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine: "Israel will guard the perimeter of the Gaza Strip, continue to control Gaza air space, and continue to patrol the sea off the Gaza coast. ... Israel will continue to maintain its essential military presence to prevent arms smuggling along the border between the Gaza Strip and Egypt (Philadelphi Route), until the security situation and cooperation with Egypt permit an alternative security arrangement."
  63. ^ Dore Gold (26 August 2005). "Legal Acrobatics: The Palestinian Claim that Gaza is Still "Occupied" Even After Israel Withdraws". Jerusalem Issue Brief. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Archived from the original on 21 June 2010. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  64. ^ Bell, Abraham (28 January 2008). "International Law and Gaza: The Assault on Israel's Right to Self-Defense". Jerusalem Issue Brief. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Archived from the original on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  65. ^ "Address by Foreign Minister Livni to the 8th Herzliya Conference" (Press release). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel. 22 January 2008. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  66. ^ Zak M. Salih (17 November 2005). "Panelists Disagree Over Gaza's Occupation Status". University of Virginia School of Law. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  67. ^ "Israel: "Disengagement" Will Not End Gaza Occupation". Human Rights Watch. 28 October 2004. Archived from the original on 23 January 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  68. "About Cook Islands". New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 11 February 2021. Archived from the original on 25 April 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  69. ^ "Home Page – Pacific Islands Report". pidp.eastwestcenter.org. Archived from the original on 19 October 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2017.
  70. Smith, Stephen Eliot. "Uncharted Waters: Has the Cook Islands become Eligible for Membership in the United Nations" (PDF). New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law. 8: 169–215. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2017.
  71. "Cook Islands' application for membership" (PDF). intaff.gov.ck. 13 November 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 November 2019. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  72. "U.S confirms recognition of the Cook Islands as a sovereign state". PINA. 30 September 2022. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  73. "Cook Islands". La France en Nouvelle Zélande. 21 December 2018. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  74. ^ "United Nations – The World Today". United Nations. 1 September 2019. Archived from the original on 3 December 2022. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  75. ^ "UN: "data for 197 countries: all 193 member states, two observer states (the Holy See and Palestine) and two non-member states (Cook Islands and Niue)"" (PDF). United Nations. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 November 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2017.
  76. ^ Mulcey, Marine. "A World Tour of the States not recognized by the UN". Translated by Perrier, Lucie. Archived from the original on 6 December 2022. Retrieved 5 September 2015.
  77. ^ "United Nations Treaty Collection". United Nations. Archived from the original on 10 June 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2017.
  78. "Kosovo MPs proclaim independence". BBC News. 17 February 2008. Archived from the original on 15 February 2009. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  79. "Kosovo" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
  80. Affairs, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign (7 November 2022). "Niue". New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Archived from the original on 21 April 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2023.
  81. "Regions and territories: Abkhazia". BBC News. 8 February 2011. Archived from the original on 5 November 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2011.
  82. ^ "Russia recognises Georgian rebels". BBC News. 26 August 2008. Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  83. ^ "Venezuela's Chavez draws closer to Moscow". Reuters. 10 September 2009. Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
  84. ^ "Syria formally recognizes Abkhazia and South Ossetia". Eurasianet. 29 May 2018. Archived from the original on 29 May 2018. Retrieved 30 May 2018.
  85. Clogg, Rachel (2001). "Abkhazia: Ten Years On" (PDF). Conciliation Resources. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 26 February 2008.
  86. ^ "South Ossetia opens embassy in Abkhazia". The Tiraspol Times. Archived from the original on 22 April 2008.
  87. Government of Tuvalu (20 September 2011). "On the establishment of diplomatic relations between Republic of Abkhazia and Tuvalu". Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 11 November 2011. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
  88. ^ "Tuvalu takes back recognition of independence of Abkhazia and so-called South Ossetia". 31 March 2014. Archived from the original on 31 March 2014. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
  89. ^ "Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia – Ministry's Statements". Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 30 September 2014.
  90. Government of Vanuatu (17 June 2011). "Vanuatu's recognition to the Republic of Abkhazia". Archived from the original on 24 June 2011. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
  91. "Natapei withdraws recognition of Abkhazia | Vanuatu Daily Post". 21 January 2012. Archived from the original on 21 January 2012. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
  92. "Georgia Says Vanuatu Has Withdrawn Recognition of Abkhazia". Bloomberg News. 20 May 2013. Archived from the original on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2014.
  93. "Security Council resolution 541 (1983) on Cyprus". United Nations. Archived from the original on 28 August 2003. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
  94. "Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Paragraph 81" (PDF). International Court of Justice. 22 July 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 August 2010. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  95. Zunes, Stephen; Mundy, Jacob (4 August 2010). Western Sahara: War, Nationalism, and Conflict Irresolution. Syracuse University Press. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-0-8156-3219-1. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
  96. "Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic". 27 February 1976. Archived from the original on 2 May 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  97. "Here the states which recognize the SADR. It is a non-official list, with dates of recognition and cancellation". ARSO. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 7 February 2011.
  98. "About Western Sahara". Australia Western Sahara Association. November 2006. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  99. "Resolutions : General Assembly (GA), 34th session : United Nations (UN)". 10 October 2011. Archived from the original on 10 October 2011. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
  100. "Proclamation on Recognizing The Sovereignty of the Kingdom of Morocco Over The Western Sahara". whitehouse.gov. 10 December 2020. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021 – via National Archives.
  101. "Morocco king rejects independence for Western Sahara". Arab News. 7 November 2017. Archived from the original on 10 June 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2019.
  102. "A reply of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of South Ossetia to IA "Res" Question Concerning the Act of Adoption of RSO State Independence on 29 of May 1992". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of South Ossetia. 29 May 2010. Archived from the original on 24 January 2022. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
  103. Global Investment and Business Center, Inc. Staff Taiwan Foreign Policy and National Security Yearbook 2011 Second Edition International Business Publications, USA ISBN 0-7397-3660-4 Online version available at Google Books
  104. "Routledge Handbook of State Recognition". Routledge & CRC Press. Archived from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
  105. "Taiwan cuts ties with Costa Rica over recognition for China". The New York Times. 7 June 2007. Archived from the original on 18 July 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  106. Winkler, Sigrid (20 June 2012). "Taiwan's UN Dilemma: To Be or Not To Be". Archived from the original on 31 March 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
  107. "Abkhazia: Ten Years On". BBC 2. 2001. Archived from the original on 21 December 2009. Retrieved 16 June 2008.
  108. "Somaliland profile". BBC News. 11 July 2011. Archived from the original on 16 December 2020. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
  109. Hagi, Mohamed (1 May 2024). "A Future Outlook: Prospects for Somaliland-Taiwan Relations". Global Taiwan Institute. Retrieved 25 July 2024. It is an official relationship in numerous respects, but not diplomatic. Put another way, the bilateral partnership is deemed official due to the signatures of two foreign ministers. On the other hand, it differs from Taiwan's relationships with its more formal diplomatic allies.
  110. Blas, Javier (3 January 2024). "A Land Deal Cranks Up the Tension in the Red Sea". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 16 June 2024. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  111. Asia West and Africa Department. "Republic of Somaliland". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 28 February 2023.
  112. "Taiwan opens representative office in Somaliland". 17 August 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2023. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
  113. "Somaliland launches representative office in Taiwan". 9 September 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2023. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
  114. Kheyr (1 January 2024). "Somaliland and Ethiopia: Recognition for Sea Access". Somali News in English | The Somali Digest. Archived from the original on 2 January 2024. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  115. Endeshaw, Dawit; Sheikh, Abdi (1 January 2024). "Ethiopia signs pact to use Somaliland's Red Sea port". Reuters. Archived from the original on 30 May 2024. Retrieved 2 January 2024.
  116. "La Orden de Malta y su Naturaleza Jurídica". Venezuela Analitica. 1 May 1999. Archived from the original on 1 August 2015. Retrieved 1 August 2015. English language translation "The Order of Malta, within the limits that are compatible with its actual position as a subject deprived of territory, is in the international community, a sovereign entity on par with the States, and the Prince Grand Master is comparable, from the point of view of international law, to the Heads of State."
  117. Permanent Observer Mission of the Order of Malta to the United Nations in New York "The admission of Order of Malta to the United Nations also further solidified its legally recognized sovereignty ..."
  118. Shaw, Malcolm Nathan International Law Fifth Edition Cambridge University Press 2003 ISBN 0-521-82473-7 p. 218 Searchable text Archived 13 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, "The Italian Court of Cassation in 1935 recognised the international personality of the Order, noting that 'the modern theory of the subjects of international law recognises a number of collective units whose composition is independent of the nationality of their constituent members and whose scope transcends by virtue of their universal character the territorial confines of any single state.' (Nanni v. Pace and the Sovereign Order of Malta 8 AD, p. 2.)"
  119. "Reconócese a la Soberana Orden Militar de Malta como Entidad Internacionál Independiente". Boletín Oficiál de la República Argentina, Año LIX, Número 16.92. Buenos Aires. 19 June 1951. p. 1. Archived from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016. "The Senate and Chamber of Deputies of Argentina, in Congress assembled, enact as LAW: Article 1 – The Sovereign Military Order of Malta is hereby recognized as an international independent entity."
  120. ^ Arocha, Magaly (May 1999). "La Orden de Malta y su Naturaleza Jurídica (The Order of Malta and Its Legal Nature)". Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela: Analítica.com. Archived from the original on 1 August 2015. Retrieved 1 October 2012. English language translation "he clear territorial separation of sovereign areas that exists between the Italian State and the State of Vatican City does not exist between the Order of Malta and the Italian State, but neither can it be said that the treatment given to the headquarters of the Order (Aventine, Via Condotti) is, simply, that reserved for the headquarters of diplomatic missions accredited to the Italian State. In fact, the headquarters of the Order have diplomatic extraterritoriality (authoritarian acts of any kind – executive, acts of inspection, judicial – cannot take place inside), but in addition, the Italian State recognizes the exercise, in the headquarters, of the prerogatives of sovereignty. This means that Italian sovereignty and Maltese sovereignty coexist without overlapping, because the Order exercises sovereign functions in a wider area than occurs in the diplomatic missions of the States for, although enjoy extraterritoriality, the guarantees deriving from the privilege of immunity are constrained to a purely administrative area; the Order, instead, makes use of extraterritoriality to meet the very acts of sovereign self-determination that are the same as the States (legislative, judicial, administrative, financial acts)."
  121. The Sovereign Military Order of Malta maintains embassies around the world and receives accreditations from foreign ambassadors.
  122. "Bilateral relations". Sovereign Order of Malta. 5 April 2023. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
  123. Cansacchi, Giorgio (1940). Il diritto di legazione attivo e passivo dell'Ordine de Malta. p. 65.
  124. Astraudo, A. (1935). "Saint-marin et l'Ordre de Malta". La Revue Diplomatique. 7.
  125. Cox, Noel S.B., The Continuing Question of Sovereignty and the Sovereign Military Order of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta (June 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1140462 Archived 13 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1140462 Archived 13 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine
  126. "Corte Suprema di Cassazione; Sezioni unite civili; sentenza 6 giugno 1974, n. 1653" (PDF). Il Foro Italiano. 98 (6): 1471/1472–1475/1476. June 1975. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 May 2022. Retrieved 10 April 2022.
  127. Varming, Kirstine Strøh (2017). THE EXPERIENTIAL LIMITS OF THE STATE: TERRITORY AND TAXATION IN GAROOWE, PUNTLAND (Technical report). p. 8–14. JSTOR resrep13400.6. Retrieved 18 December 2023. This is important to consider, when discussing statehood in Puntland state, as in many ways, it functions as an independent state very much like the self-declared Republic of Somaliland.
  128. Africanews, Rédaction (11 January 2023). "Somalia: Puntland state dissociates itself from Mogadishu". Africanews. Archived from the original on 18 December 2023. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  129. Brown, Nathan J. (11 June 2012). "Gaza Five Years On: Hamas Settles In". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived from the original on 3 May 2023. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  130. Jüde, Johannes (2017). "Contesting borders? The formation of Iraqi Kurdistan's de facto state". International Affairs. 93 (4): 847–863. doi:10.1093/ia/iix125. ISSN 0020-5850.
  131. Court, Mireille; Den Hond, Chris (1 September 2017). "Experiment in self-rule in Rojava". Le Monde diplomatique. Archived from the original on 18 December 2023. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  132. Kumbun, Joe (23 April 2019). "Protected by China, Wa Is Now a de Facto Independent State". The Irrawaddy. Archived from the original on 29 November 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  133. "State Responses". Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press. 31 December 2021. pp. 162–200. doi:10.1017/9781009150132.006. ISBN 9781009150132. S2CID 245453022.
  134. "Date of Recognition and Establishment od Diplomatic Relations". mvep.gov.hr. Croatian Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. Archived from the original on 28 September 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
  135. "Dates of Recognition and Establishment of Diplomatic Relations". mip.gov.me. Montenegrin Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 17 May 2013. Retrieved 1 March 2022.

Further reading

States with limited recognition
Details concerning international recognition and foreign relations provided by the articles linked in parentheses
UN member states
Partially unrecognised
UN specialized agency members
or GA observer state
Partially unrecognised
Non-UN member
states
Recognised by at least
one UN member
Recognised only by
non-UN members
Categories: