Revision as of 22:11, 2 June 2004 editAmbarish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,528 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:36, 27 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:India/Archive 60) (bot |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
Archive 1: ] |
|
|
|
{{FAQ|collapsed=yes}} |
|
---- |
|
|
|
{{Indian English}} |
|
]'s main page requires culling to limit the file size under 30 Kb as per wikipedia's recommendations. ] 19:27, May 6, 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
---- |
|
|
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|
|action1date=22:24, 16 Sep 2004 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/India |
|
|
|action1result=promoted |
|
|
|action1oldid=5945311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=FAR |
|
== Religion in India: caste == |
|
|
|
|action2date=11 Apr 2005 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article removal candidates/India/archive1 |
|
|
|action2result=kept |
|
|
|action2oldid=12191859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action3=FAR |
|
If we're going to label Hinduism as 'caste' and vice versa, we're not being faithful to reality nor NPOV. It has also to do with the nature of society and feudalism in communities that were justified by caste prejudices incorporated into religion, much like Divine Right in feudal Europe. Also, it is well-acknowledged that there does exist great caste prejudices in many non-Hindu communities in India, certainly not all, but enough that it is not merely a 'status symbol.' Also, major movements in Hinduism have, since before Buddha, been against caste. So to define all of Hinduism as embedded in caste while ignoring its history of vedanta, yoga, tantra and bhakti movements galore, is in my mind irresponsible and inaccurate. Let us discuss further. --] 20:31, May 6, 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action3date=15:45, 6 May 2006 |
|
|
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article removal candidates/India/archive2 |
|
|
|action3result=kept |
|
|
|action3oldid=51836931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action4=FAR |
|
:I know casteism is a curse, unfortunately it has crept into other religions in India which abhors it. You are right in pointing out that caste is a part of Hindu society. A lot of ]n ] (see any matrimonials) do brazenly proclaim that they are ''Brahmin'' Catholics, inspite of the Church against caste. |
|
|
|
|action4date=14:15, 28 July 2011 |
|
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/India/archive2 |
|
|
|action4result=kept |
|
|
|action4oldid=441811169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus=FA |
|
Unfortunately the Indian government, officially banning casteism, still has reservations for castes. I also wish to seek further opinion: Can a hindu marriage be sanctified by a priest who's a non brahmin? Are all Hindu priests necessarily Brahmin? |
|
|
|
|maindate=December 3, 2004 |
|
] 19:00, May 7, 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|maindate2=October 2, 2019 |
|
|
|otd1date=2004-08-15|otd1oldid=5256057 |
|
|
|otd2date=2005-08-15|otd2oldid=21044027 |
|
|
|otd3date=2011-08-15|otd3oldid=444882019 |
|
|
|otd4date=2012-11-26|otd4oldid=524820236 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA |vital=yes |collapsed=yes |listas=India|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Asia|importance=Top |india=Yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=Top |portal=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject South Asia|importance=Top }} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=High }} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Countries}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors |user=Twofingered Typist |date=21 September 2019}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|topic=ipa|protection=ecp}} |
|
|
{{Press|collapsed=yes|date=17 August 2009 |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Misplaced Pages-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html |title=The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008 |org=] |date2=27 August 2009 |url2=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6099890/Wikipedia-Top-20-people-places-film-and-technology-articles.html|title2=Misplaced Pages: Top 20 people, places, film and technology articles |org2=] |author2=James Steyn |date3=4 July 2015 |url3=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/The-vandals-of-Wiki/articleshow/47941452.cms |title3=The Vandals of Wiki |org3=] |author3=Sandhya Soman}} |
|
|
{{tmbox |
|
|
| type = speedy |
|
|
| text = <big><big><big>'''PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING AN EDIT REQUEST ABOUT CHANGING THE COUNTRY NAME'''</big></big><br>If you have come here to post that the country name should be changed from India to Bharat, please note that we use the ] (common name) to determine article names, even when a country changes its name. For an example, see ], where the official name of the country (Türkiye) is noted in the lead sentence and the infobox, but the article remains at its common English name.</big> |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{banner holder |collapsed=yes |1= |
|
|
{{All time pageviews|151}} |
|
|
{{Annual report|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]}} |
|
|
{{Top 25 report |
|
|
| August 11, 2013 |
|
|
| October 20, 2013 | until | November 24, 2013 |
|
|
| December 8, 2013 |
|
|
| December 29, 2013 | until | January 19, 2014 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Spoken article requested|{{U|Sdkb}}|Featured article, and one that may have a higher-than-average proportion of readers who are English language learners}} |
|
|
{{Annual readership |width=570 |days=182}} |
|
|
{{Section sizes}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 75K |
|
|
|counter = 60 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:India/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Humans made it to Australia before here == |
|
: Well, just to clarify convention. Technically, anyone who is a Hindu priest is called a Brahmin. But of course, there is the caste. People differentiate between a practicing Brahmin and one of the Brahmin caste. Unfortunately, yes, Brahmins (priests) are usually culled only from the Brahmin caste. --] 21:03, May 7, 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Humans made it to Australia before here bypassing India? ] (]) 01:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
: Just to add to LordSurya's response, in many villages in Tamil Nadu, there are no Brahmins left; because of, among other reasons, the Dravidian movement, the Brahmins have all migrated to cities. Lots of village temples thus have priests who're not Brahmins. I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case in many other regions. ] ] 22:13, 7 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:This is the problem with random statistics in the lead....There is a debate if we where here before the ] as outlined at {{cite journal | last=Clarkson | first=Chris | last2=Harris | first2=Clair | last3=Li | first3=Bo | last4=Neudorf | first4=Christina M. | last5=Roberts | first5=Richard G. | last6=Lane | first6=Christine | last7=Norman | first7=Kasih | last8=Pal | first8=Jagannath | last9=Jones | first9=Sacha | last10=Shipton | first10=Ceri | last11=Koshy | first11=Jinu | last12=Gupta | first12=M. C. | last13=Mishra | first13=D. P. | last14=Dubey | first14=A. K. | last15=Boivin | first15=Nicole | last16=Petraglia | first16=Michael | title=Human occupation of northern India spans the Toba super-eruption ~74,000 years ago | journal=Nature Communications | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | volume=11 | issue=1 | date=2020-02-25 | issn=2041-1723 | doi=10.1038/s41467-020-14668-4 | doi-access=free | page=}}..... The debate should be removed from the lead and explained in the article in detail...... As the number 55 seems to be a synthesis of sources with an average guess compiled by Misplaced Pages editors.<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>🍁 01:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Casteism hasn't crept into other religions as someone has mentioned above and in the main page. It is just that people retain or are forced to retain their caste affiliations even after conversion to other religions. ] 03:18, 8 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Dear IP, The earliest identified anatomically modern human remains found thus far outside Africa are in Australia. That has been known for a very long time. But the human migration out of Africa is based on modern DNA marker evidence, both the mitochondrial which came to be analyzed with a fair level of certainty by the late 1980s and the Y-chromosome which did by early 2010s. |
|
|
:What appears in this article is only material that has appeared in introductory-textbooks, i.e. has been vetted for ]. See ] for the role of these text books in due weight. |
|
|
:The first book we have cited (in the sentence about human migration in the lead) is a first-year-graduate level textbook written by and ], leading physical anthropologists. Naturally we give it primacy as their subject of specialization is most closely associated with human migration into South Asia. These authors say, "Y-Chromosome and Mt-DNA data support the colonization of South Asia by modern humans originating in Africa. ... Coalescence dates for most non-European populations average to between 73 and 55 ka." (where KA or KYA stands for "thousand years ago.") |
|
|
:The other two citations are also to textbooks, one the major historical demographer of South Asia, ],'s ''Population History of India'', published by Oxford University Press in 2018, and the other the environmental historian, Michael Fisher's ''Environmental History of India'', published by Cambridge University Press, in 2018. All three are cited in the lead, and all three citations have generous quotes. |
|
|
:We have not averaged out the various estimates, as {{re|Moxy}} has conjectured; rather, we have relied on the scholarly tertiary sources to do so for us. In particular, Tim Dyson says, "It is virtually certain that there were Homo sapiens in the subcontinent 55,000 years ago, even though the earliest fossils that have been found of them date to only about 30,000 years before the present." (as opposed to Australia, I might add, where the earliest fossils have been dated to 47 KYA). |
|
|
:So the fact that two leading physical anthropologists, Petraglia and Allchin, one of the human migration out of Africa and the other of India, and the leading historical demographer, had all three picked 55 KYA, is what clinched that particular date for us. Note we say, "By 55KYA ..." That means they might have come earlier, but no later. |
|
|
:Also for us, ''Nature Communications'' (cited by Moxy) whose average turn-around-time for first notice of acceptance is 8 days is not the best choice for supporting or discrediting the settled broadscale view of this article. Best regards, ]] 20:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Sould drop 55 from the lead as its simply a Misplaced Pages guesstimation. And say in the body that there are two different answers:"Tthe 'early version' states that they came from Africa through the Arabian peninsula 74,000 to 120,000 years ago, bringing Middle Stone Age tools for hunting, gathering food, and making clothes. The 'late version' claims they arrived later, about 50,000 to 60,000 years ago. By 50,000 B. C. , tools were made in large numbers with organized workers and established communication routes for distribution.<small>"{{cite book | last=Joseph | first=T. | title=Early Indians: The Story of Our Ancestors and where We Came from | publisher=Juggernaut | year=2018 | isbn=978-93-91165-95-6}}</small> Should also link the articles we have on the topic so other can read about the debate ].<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>🍁 20:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::If you have a scholarly tertiary source, such as the three major ones I have mentioned, please add them here; otherwise, you are wasting community time. ]] 12:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Yes waste of time here <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>🍁 13:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Discussion about add India's house speaker and chief justice in Wiki page == |
|
::: You are quite wrong KRS. Just recently there was an uproar in Kerala because Christian converts barred lower-castes from their church and refused to let them in. No one was forcing them to do anything. In the same way, many Hindus do reject casteism and many Hindu movements from years ago reject caste categorically. --] 05:11, May 8, 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Afternoon to all my respected editors, I have a suggestion that I want to add India's house speaker and chief justice name in the page because many countries has their house speaker and chief justice name in their wiki page like USA so as an Indian I want to add their names in the wiki page so what's your thoughts about this? ] (]) 08:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::: No, I am right as the incident you bring out itself shows - you are talking of converts, so obviously, even after changing their religion, the caste affiliations are either proudly retained or used as a means of supression in case of upper castes or are being thrust upon on lower castes; also lower caste converts retain their caste identity for benefits- for example Dalit Christians. That covers the exact meaning conveyed by my statement. The issue here is not Hinduism, but Hindu society, or rather, Indian society that is largely determined by Hindu practices. Indian society and culture should be seen as one including Muslims, Hindus and Christians, they are definitely no different. There is an Indian consciousness that separates Indian Christians or Muslims from their counterparts elsewhere. My edits in Indian society convey this clearly. ] 06:31, 8 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Best follow other ] that dont list them because of lack of mention in the articles or simply because of position non notibility on an international scale. <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>🍁 08:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::I agree to add the names of Speaker and Chief Justice, don't know what so exception for only India that's it's removed. ] (]) 09:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::So give me the permission so that I can add Speaker and Chief justice name ] (]) 09:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::], the rationale is given by Moxy. This is a Featured article and, those positions aren't internationally notable for a general crowd.<span id="Benison:1731512630206:TalkFTTCLNIndia" class="FTTCmt"> — — Benison <small>(] · ])</small> 15:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
|
::::Well, it's mentioned in most of the democratic countries. That's why it should be mentioned. ] (]) 16:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::So I want that permission for that because internationally India is now more popular so why not everybody needs to know who is India's chief justice and House Speaker ] (]) 16:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::@] Wait if you gets permission. by the way Misplaced Pages runs from west point of view, how the west sees the world. ] (]) 16:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::] is a ], or FA. That means its layout, lexicon, syntax, and style conform to ] and the article has had at least one major community review (WP's most rigorous) and likely more for older articles. Moreover, there are only , of which India is the oldest, now 20 years old. If you examine those <s>eight</s> FAs, the ''other'' major ones—], ], ], and ]—have but two offices listed under government and they are not the speaker. ] and ] do have longer lists, but I have not looked at their page-histories to see if they were changed after the community review. ] (around whose perimeter my late parents had once walked many moons ago) does have the speaker listed, but among only two in the list. Best regards, ]] 16:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::PS And ], which is also major, certainly for ], has only two listed under the government ]] 16:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::], Once again, it has nothing to do with democracy. It all depends on the article quality. India is a ], one of the oldest of it's kind. Hence, it follows that guideline.<br/>@], Misplaced Pages works on ]. You need to start a discussion in this talk page, demonstrating the need of inclusion of the speaker and CJ in the infobox, followed by proper rationale and guidlines. Then the editors of the page will decide via consensus if that inclusion is needed. Once again, I urge you both to go through ] page to understand what a featured article is and how it is different from other pages on various (democratic) countries. Happy editing :)<span id="Benison:1731515658060:TalkFTTCLNIndia" class="FTTCmt"> — — Benison <small>(] · ])</small> 16:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
|
::::::There must have been an edit conflict, but I didn't see your post Benison and ended up repeating parts of your reply. Apologies. ]] 16:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Thank you for all of this I understand now and sorry to disturb you sir and please forgive me if I done something wrong ] (]) 16:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Not your fault {{re|Roni0102}}. We should really have an FAQ up top. I've been meaning to for ages, but dawdling (also for ages). ]] 16:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::Hey guys i think we should add the speaker name and chief justice in the lead. It's important part. ] (]) 04:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::], Kindly re read the messages and replies above. Clearly th3 consensus is against it. Thanks.<span id="Benison:1731835180733:TalkFTTCLNIndia" class="FTTCmt"> — — Benison <small>(] · ])</small> 09:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
|
:::::::::::hello sir someone removed the vice president name of India so sir can you fix that sir ] (]) 08:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::Only the head of state and the head of government. The other major ], such as ], ], ] and ], show only those. Please don't post again with the same question. We can't change what is there. Best regards, ]] 10:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::@] I previously replied his comment below. ]] 13:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::Yes, I had seen your reply. It is the reason I (more or less} copied it in my reply, and later thanked you publicly. ]] 14:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Change in CPI score and India's rank as per the latest report by CPI == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corruption in India is perceived to have increased during the last decade. According to the Corruption Perceptions Index, India was ranked 78th out of 180 countries in 2018 with a score of 41 out of 100, an improvement from 85th in 2014, but has increased during the last decade as India now Ranks at 95th out of 180 countries listed with a score of 39 well below the global average of 42 as can be seen at this |
|
::: I submit you are right. Nicely made points and changes. --] 22:59, May 8, 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023/index/ind |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The previously mentioned data has not been updated for a decade now and needs updation in some shape or form. ] (]) 01:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
the lodhi dynasty are pukhtun afghan, not turkic. there are some other inaccuracies as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== change population statistics == |
|
== Why is the Hindi being removed from the India article? == |
|
|
Why is the Hindi in the India article meaning "Republic of India" being removed? ] 05:01, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
there have been new census; delete this after confirmation and editings. ] (]) 16:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:1. It is totally irrelevant here, 2. The word "India" doesn't have any relation to "Hindi" as "Japan" vs. "Japanese" or so, 3. The page is also available in Hindi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Well, do you have a source saying so? ] (]|]) 16:35, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
It is standard practice to give the names of countries in their own official language. ] '''] 05:21, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Repeated edits in the lead without a discussion here == |
|
:So...it is ok to add all the national languages (]) here??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{re|Khassanu}} Please read ]. It is very helpful when editors look at this article with fresh eyes and correct errors. But we all have to play by the same rules: Minor, factual edits are fine, but anything substantial requires a discussion and renewed consensus on this talk page. |
|
The other languages are basically official languages for different Indian states, aren't they? So it would make more sense to list them in the articles on those states than in articles on India. English and Hindi are the two official languages of national administration, so it makes sense to give the name in Hindi, but not in the other languages, in this article. ] '''] 06:02, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View for example that major changes you had made in . Please engage editors here on the talk page, explain what you would like to do, and achieve a consensus for it. Soft pinging ] and ] ]] 17:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Strictly speaking, all languages should be listed or removed as all the languages important. And it is much awkward to see translation, transliteration and explanation everything there. And it is skeptical, how many people call India as Bharat Ganarajya as stated here. Just do a Google search and all the sources linked to the Wiki and clones--no other pages or sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== POLITICAL SCIENCE == |
|
I'm not sure what you're getting at. As an official language, Hindi has a status different from that of the other national languages. It would also be impracticable to list 18 different names. So what's wrong with just giving the English and Hindi? ] '''] 06:43, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ವಿಶ್ವಸಂಸ್ಥೆ ಮತ್ತು ಭಾರತ ] (]) 06:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Not sure, whether you read the previous reply or not. And couldn't understand it is the place for language or usage evangelification as no other pages refer such |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:ನಮಸ್ಕಾರ! ಇದಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ಕನ್ನಡ ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯಕ್ಕೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ ಅಥವಾ ಇಂಗ್ಲಿಷ್ನಲ್ಲಿ ಹೇಳಿ. ಧನ್ಯವಾದಗಳು. ] (]|]) 06:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Alright, I'm not sure if you read my previous reply. I have no idea what you're talking about. English and Hindi have a status in India which is above and beyond that of the other national languages. It would be impractical to list 20 different names in the box, and not very useful. As such, it makes sense to just list the English and Hindi names, and no others. This is not about Misplaced Pages promoting Hindi - it is about acknowledging the already existing fact that Hindi is an "official language" of India in a way that the other languages are not. Beyond that, I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. ] '''] 07:31, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 13#ভাৰত}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 17:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 December 2024 == |
|
:Yes, I understand... you're discussing without knowing what I'm talking about or what the topic is about |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|India|answered=yes}} |
|
Next time, Rjyan, use four tildes (~) after your name to identify yourself. |
|
|
|
India's population is 1,457,248,665 as of Friday, December 27, 2024<ref>{{cite web |last1=2024 |first1=India Population |title=India Population 2024 |url=https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/india-population/ |website=morldometer |publisher=worldometer |access-date=27 December 2024}}</ref> ] (]) 10:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Another thing is that you've got to prove that we do know about the topic we are discussing about. I'm siding with John on this one. Many languages are spoken in India, but they are purely regional - only Hindi and English have national status, so only they get to be featured on the India table. |
|
|
] 21:57, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{Not done}}: Worldometer is unreliable. ] (]|]) 10:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Well, I think it's a bit more complicated than that. Various other languages have some sort of quasi-official status, and are the official languages of individual Indian states, but they are not used by the national government. I think it would be fair to say that they should, at least in theory, all be located here. But that would be deeply awkward. Given that Hindi enjoys a special status, I find it hard to see why it should be ''excluded'' simply because it's impractical to use all 22 languages, or whatever. ] '''] 23:16, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Ref-talk}} |
|
|
|
|
: Let me add my two paise's worth. India has 18 national languages, and ], they're not necessarily official languages of states (]), nor are all official state languages automatically national languages (], for instance). However, as John Kenney and ] point out, ] has a constitutional status different from the other languages, and English has a still different status. This has actually long been a very contentious issue, especially in ] (from where both ] and ] originate), where a lot of folks believe Hindi has been imposed upon them (see, for instance, http://www.thedmk.org/hindi.html). I happen to agree, but I believe Misplaced Pages should report facts, and the facts say Hindi is the sole official language of the nation, while English is quasi-official. Thus, I think the Hindi text should stay. BTW, Rrjanbiah, even if (hypothetically) the status of the 18 languages were the same, it doesn't mean all 18 languages should feature in the article. Look at ], for instance. ] | ] 23:17, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: India has different "official" languages with different uses. Two are in national governmental use (they can get listed) - 16 others can be adopted by individual states but '''are not used nationally'''! Hindi, while not spoken by the majority of the people in your area, is a language used all throughout India. Only languages used all throughout India get listed. Regional languages, e.g. what is used in Tamil Nadu shouldn't get listed. South Africa is different - all of the "national languages" get the same status, and all are listed in the ] article, though only three are in the table. |
|
|
|
|
|
And even then, this isn't a reason to delete the Hindi in the first place! ] 23:25, 25 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
There is no reason to remove hindi. Though it is not true that hindi is spoken throughout India, it has to be admitted that hindi is an official language of India in a sense that the other 21 are not.(Totally 22 languages are recogniased by the Indian Government. Bodo, Dogri, Maithili and Santhali are recent additions). Technically there are three different levels of recognition fo languages. English was to be the sole official language till 1965 when it was to have been replaced by Hindi. However, it could not be done and both hindi and english are recognised. Hindi is the official language and English the associate official language. The other 21(Assamese to Urdu) are recognised languages and are in official status below English and Hindi. THough personally peopple may feel that this is special treatment to hindi, it is the present situation in India and that should be reflected in the page. So the name in hindi need not be deleted. Whether it is right or wrong on the part of Indian Government is not the issue here. ] 05:21, 27 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
The ] page, has the country named in all 11 official languages ] 13:25, 28 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Indeed, yes. The point I was trying to make above that it's not necessary (nor would it make the article readable) to have 22 different lines in 22 different languages in the infobox on the right. ] | ] 15:52, 28 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::As Kartheeque explained, unlike in South Africa, the languages in India operate on different levels. Only two are at "national level". The other 20 are languages which individual states are allowed to declare as individual languages. ] 17:21, 28 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::: I think we agree that there should be English and Hindi alone in the article. However, you're wrong about the status of the 20 other languages. See my explanation above - the 20 national languages have nothing to do with state languages of individual states. ] | ] 18:47, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::: From: ] |
|
|
::::"Additionally, it classifies a set of 18 scheduled languages which are languages that can be officially adopted by different states for administrative purposes, and also as a medium of communication between the national and the state governments, as also for examinations conducted for national government service." |
|
|
:::: It does have to do with the states. ] 05:12, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::: Thanks for the references, WhisperToMe. IMO, the words quoted above aren't saying anything at all - "can be officially adopted" neither means "should be adopted" nor does it mean "only these can be adopted". To cite an example, Bhojpuri and Marwari, not part of Schedule 8, are official state languages of the states of Bihar and Rajasthan respectively. Sanskrit, part of Schedule 8, isn't an official language of any state, nor is it used for any sort of day-to-day communication whatsoever. ] | ] 22:11, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Indian Army == |
|
|
Currently the link ] links to a page which starts |
|
|
''The Indian Army was the British backed and led army in India'' I think disambiguation is needed.] 13:25, 28 May 2004 (UTC) |
|
Good Afternoon to all my respected editors, I have a suggestion that I want to add India's house speaker and chief justice name in the page because many countries has their house speaker and chief justice name in their wiki page like USA so as an Indian I want to add their names in the wiki page so what's your thoughts about this? Roni0102 (talk) 08:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Corruption in India is perceived to have increased during the last decade. According to the Corruption Perceptions Index, India was ranked 78th out of 180 countries in 2018 with a score of 41 out of 100, an improvement from 85th in 2014, but has increased during the last decade as India now Ranks at 95th out of 180 countries listed with a score of 39 well below the global average of 42 as can be seen at this
https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023/index/ind