| Revision as of 19:45, 12 November 2010 editTothwolf (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,326 edits →Harassment of Tothwolf by Theserialcomma: Comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,362 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jehochman/Archives 25. (BOT) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Inline image | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |image = File:Naturhistorisk Privatundervisning.jpg | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| | |
|size = 500px | ||
| |align = center | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| |alt = Placeholder alt text | |||
| |archive = User talk:Jehochman/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| |fullwidth = yes | |||
| |capcenter = yes | |||
| |caption = <br/>{{big|{{big|"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"}}}}{{small|]}} | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{/Antizilla}} | |||
| <!--my archives are messed up so I have removed the links. They might be fixed some day--> | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| ] | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Jehochman/Archives | |||
| |format= %%i | |||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| |age=168 | |||
| |minkeepthreads=1 | |||
| == ] == | |||
| |maxarchsize=350000 | |||
| |numberstart=25 | |||
| Hello, could you as the previous blocking admin comment? Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 07:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |header={{aan}} | |||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}</nowiki> | |||
| *Sorry again Jehochman but this needs an eye kept on it. I know LM was unblocked stating that they'd raise an RFC on the whole 'British Isles thing' but this as it is currenly presented is an assumption of bad faith cast in a battleground mentality. I have noted to LM at the RFC the issues with it including the lack of evidence; incorrect categorization of the RFC; repetetion of the question asked at the page's recent MFD; and I would ask, as I will be away for the next few days, that this be reviewed over the next 72 hours. LM deserves the chance to reformat the RFC in line with policy within a reasonable period of time but if this is not done or if there is undue delay fixing the POINTY issues I see this as a violation of ] and the terms of LM's two recent unblockings. I will be notifying TWOFR and Sarek of Vulcan of this post--] <sup>]</sup> 15:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == "Premature" Submission == | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| FYI, the situation ], which you participated in, has been resolved. I expected one of the admin coordinators would have seen my reminder on our noticeboard and would have deleted it before it was noticed by anyone else. Sorry for the confusion, <span style="text-shadow:#CC1100 0.10em 0.10em 0.10em"><font color="black">]</font> <sub><span style="text-shadow:#ffd700 0.14em 0.14em 0.14em"><font color="black">]</font></sub></span> 19:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)</span> | |||
| : I am disappointed that you're not running. :-( ] <sup>]</sup> 20:54, 5 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh, I actually think I'd do a bang up job, but I've only had an account for a month. I'd be laughed out of contention. By the way, can you do me a favor and take that rap from my "submission" and place it in ]? I really want it back. <span style="text-shadow:#2f4f4f 0.10em 0.10em 0.10em"><font color="black">]</font> <sub><span style="text-shadow:#ffd700 0.14em 0.14em 0.14em"><font color="black">]</font></sub></span> 23:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)</span> | |||
| ::: Here you are . ] <sup>]</sup> 00:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That was far too simple for me to figure out on my own. Thanks. <span style="text-shadow:#8A360F 0.10em 0.10em 0.10em"><font color="black">]</font> <sub><span style="text-shadow:#ffd700 0.14em 0.14em 0.14em"><font color="black">]</font></sub></span> 00:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)</span> | |||
| == Harassment of Tothwolf by Theserialcomma == | |||
| Hello there. I happened to notice that Theserialcomma has been on Tothwolf's case again. I considered filing an arbitration request personally, but all the formatting and templates and instructions there made my head spin, so I decided to come to you instead based on from the amendment request. | |||
| Theserialcomma has been editing ] again. All of his edits are removal of content, and most are reverted by editors uninvolved with the dispute between Theserialcomma and Tothwolf. This can be seen from the history. He also has been repeatedly accusing Tothwolf of COI in his edit summaries and on the talk page of Eggdrop and the talk page of previously uninvolved IRCWolfie . Also , after it was found in the arbitration amendment request that boomeranged on Miami33139 that repeatedly calling someone "paranoid" is a personal attack. ] (]) 01:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Theserialcomma posted a highly offensive rant after I blocked them. They most likely will not be returning. ] <sup>]</sup> 11:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::On a related note, could someone have a look over the ] article and let me know of any potential NPOV issues from my adding sources and citations? I don't ''think'' I violated the neutral point of view policy, and no one other than Theserialcomma has ever really taken any issues with my edits, but a few extra pairs of eyes to check it over would still be good. --] (]) 11:24, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::I have no idea. Ask ] for help or start a thread at ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 11:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Will do, thanks! --] (]) 03:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Still on the subject of Theserialcomma, I'd like to ask your opinion on whether this is worth filing an SPI over. After you blocked TSC, he claimed he'd already registered a new user account. | |||
| I mentioned above how Theserialcomma and I crossed paths at ]. made his first wikipedia edit to that article. While new users frequently head straight to that article, this particular one has done something further that makes me suspect it is TSC reincarnated. I'd rather not describe it publicly lest he take note and edit differently to avoid scrutiny, but I'm calling ]. | |||
| Anyway, if it is TSC, he'd be dodging a block. ] (]) 06:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :While I previously had no reason to go looking, after the recent sockpuppetry threat and one previously, I did some checking and there appears to be a pattern of sockpuppetry that goes back to at least 2007. Per ] the details probably shouldn't be posted on-wiki (at least not yet) but feel free to ping me via email and I'll provide some links and diffs. --] (]) 04:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{redflag}} I am not a checkuser. You need one. Hello, do I have a friendly talk page stalker with checkuser ops? ] <sup>]</sup> 00:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::I guess there aren't any lurking about? What should be done with all this material? It really doesn't seem to be the sort of thing that should be posted on ]. --] (]) 09:43, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::I've emailed the material to ]. --] (]) 19:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Climate change == | |||
| {{discussion top}} | |||
| I mention you in this request for clarification of the ArbCom Climate Change case. -- ] (]) 05:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{enough|tested limits}} ] <sup>]</sup> 21:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::@Polargeo: Are you still allowed to talk about CC, or have you been topic banned? I can't bother to check right now, but when I come back, I will, and if your names are on the list of topic banned editors, I will block you if your comments are still here on my talk page. ''This page'' is not to be misused. Get it? ] <sup>]</sup> 12:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::@Polargeo: Maybe I'm joking, maybe I'm not. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:25, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::@Polargeo: Just one question: are you topic banned from climate change, or not? Please answer with a maximum of three and a minimum of two characters (e.g. Yes or No). Thank you! ] <sup>]</sup> 13:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::* ] is ]. --] (]) 13:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::** Or ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:57, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{discussion bottom}} | |||
| :::::*Remember the text I added that you removed reminding you that humorous and sarcastic was welcome on this page (see top of your talkpage) thankyou ] (]) 14:06, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I didn't block you did I? Humorous and sarcastic comments ''are'' welcome, but I get to be the judge! Haw, my talk page, my rules. ''Jehochman grins wickedly.'' ] <sup>]</sup> 14:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Evil. ] (]) 14:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Thank you very much. I can't wait until my kids see the next Harry Patter movie. When we get them home and put them to bed, I am going to practice my Voldemort imitations. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted: | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| * A ] of ] is authorized for the entire topic area of climate change. Enforcement requests are to be submitted to ], which is to replace ]. | |||
| * Experienced administrators, and especially checkusers, are requested to closely monitor new accounts that edit inappropriately in the topic area. | |||
| * Within seven days of this remedy passing, all parties must either delete evidence sub-pages or ] of them. | |||
| * The following editors are banned from the topic area of climate change, and may not appeal this ban until at least six months after the closure of this case (and no more often than every three months thereafter); | |||
| <div style="margin-left: 4em;">{{div col|cols=3}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{div col end}}</div> | |||
| * The following users have accepted binding voluntary topic bans; | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| * The following administrators are explicitly restricted from applying discretionary sanctions as authorized in this case, as is any other administrator fitting the ]; | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Not on behalf of ArbCom, but as a public service announcement... --] (]) 13:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Notice - COI discussion == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Please see ]. Thank you for your time, -- ''']''' (]) 14:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Now also at ] due to issues involving ]. -- ''']''' (]) 15:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| Jehochman, this arose because you made a false accusation that I violated ]. As ] states, '']'' Since I did not edit mainspace and since I disclosed my conflict of interest, I did not violate ]. Cirt has made false allegations about me to three message boards in retaliation for an editing dispute at ]. Can you stop his harassment, please? I also need oversight, because his false accusation could result in another meritless lawsuit against me (this very real concern of mine is what Cirt is caling a "legal threat"). ] (]) 15:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :THF continues to make veiled legal threats on multiple pages. Jehochman, my ] report only references ''on-Misplaced Pages'' comments, from THF himself. -- ''']''' (]) 15:24, 12 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024
"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"Source
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)