Misplaced Pages

Pantheism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:33, 19 November 2010 editGirasoleDE (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers19,504 editsm History← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:16, 8 November 2024 edit undoPacker1028 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,705 editsm Fixed typoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App select source 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Belief that God and reality are identical}}
'''Pantheism''' is the view that the ] (]) and God are identical.<ref>]</ref> Pantheists thus do not believe in a ], ] or ]. The word derives from the {{lang-grc|]}} ('']'') meaning ‘all’ and '']'' ('']'') meaning ‘God’. As such, Pantheism denotes the idea that “]” is best seen as a way of relating to the ].<ref name="Deity">Owen, H. P. ''Concepts of Deity''. London: Macmillan, 1971.</ref> Although there are divergences within Pantheism, the central ideas found in almost all versions are the Cosmos as an all-encompassing unity and the sacredness of Nature.
{{Distinguish|Pandeism|Panentheism|Panpsychism}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2015}}

{{God sidebar}}

'''Pantheism''' is the ] and ] belief that ], the ], and ] are identical to ] or a ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pantheism – Definition, Meaning & Synonyms |url=https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/pantheism |access-date=2023-03-23 |website=Vocabulary.com |language=en-US}}</ref> The physical universe is thus understood as an ] ], still expanding and creating, which has existed since the beginning of time.<ref>{{cite book |title=The New ] |publisher=] |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-19-861263-6 |location=Oxford |page=1341}}</ref> The term ''pantheist'' designates one who holds both that everything constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine, consisting of an all-encompassing, manifested ] or ].<ref name="Edwards">{{Cite book|title = Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards |publisher=Macmillan and Free Press |year = 1967 |location = New York|page=34}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Reid-Bowen|first=Paul|title=Goddess as Nature: Towards a Philosophical Thealogy|page=70|publisher=]|year=2016|isbn=978-1317126348}}</ref> All ] are thence viewed as parts of a sole deity.

Another definition of pantheism is the worship of all gods of every religion. But this is more precisely termed ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pantheism| title=Definition of Pantheism | date=28 September 2023 }}</ref>
Pantheist ] does not recognize a distinct ],<ref>{{cite book |title=A Companion to Philosophy of Religion |editor1=Charles Taliaferro |editor2=Paul Draper |editor3=Philip L. Quinn |page=340 |quote=They deny that God is 'totally other' than the world or ontologically distinct from it.}}</ref> ] or otherwise, but instead characterizes a broad range of doctrines differing in forms of relationships between reality and divinity.<ref name="LevineDetailed" /> Pantheistic concepts date back thousands of years, and pantheistic elements have been identified in various religious traditions. The term ''pantheism'' was coined by mathematician ] in 1697<ref name="Taylor" /><ref name="Thomson" /> and since then, it has been used to describe the beliefs of a variety of people and organizations.

Pantheism was popularized in ] as a ] and philosophy based on the work of the 17th-century philosopher ], in particular, his book '']''.<ref name="Genevieve Lloyd 1996">{{cite book |first=Genevieve |last=Lloyd |title=Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Spinoza and The Ethics |series=Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks |publisher=] |edition=|year= 1996 |isbn=978-0-415-10782-2 |page=24}}</ref> A pantheistic stance was also taken in the 16th century by philosopher and cosmologist ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Birx |first=Jams H. |url=http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html |title=Giordano Bruno |publisher=The Harbinger |location=] |date=11 November 1997 |quote=Bruno was burned to death at the stake for his pantheistic stance and cosmic perspective. |access-date=5 February 2019 |archive-date=27 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170727101806/http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/971111/birx.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In the East, ], a school of ] is thought to be similar to pantheism in Western philosophy. The early ] of ] and ] is also sometimes considered pantheistic, although it could be more similar to ]. ], which arose in the ] of Korea, and ] are also considered pantheistic.

==Etymology==
''Pantheism'' derives from the ] word πᾶν ''pan'' (meaning "all, of everything") and θεός ''theos'' (meaning "god, divine"). The first known combination of these roots appears in ], in ]'s 1697 book ''De Spatio Reali seu Ente Infinito'',<ref name="Thomson" /> where he refers to "pantheismus".<ref name="Taylor">{{cite book|last1=Taylor|first1=Bron|title=Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature|date=2008|publisher=A&C Black|isbn=978-1441122780|pages=1341–1342|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i4mvAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1342|access-date=27 July 2017}}</ref>
It was subsequently translated into English as "pantheism" in 1702.

==Definitions==

{{Spirituality sidebar}}
{{Nontheism and religion}}
|url-access=registration}}</ref>]]
There are numerous definitions of pantheism, including:
* a ] which identifies God with the universe, or regards the universe as a manifestation of God;<ref name="Picton">{{cite book|last=Picton|first=James Allanson|title=Pantheism: its story and significance|year=1905|publisher=Archibald Constable & Co. LTD.|location=Chicago|isbn=978-1419140082|url=https://archive.org/details/pantheismitsstor00pictrich}}</ref>
* the belief that everything is part of an all-encompassing, immanent God, and that all forms of reality may then be considered either modes of that Being, or identical with it;<ref name="Deity">Owen, H. P. ''Concepts of Deity''. London: Macmillan, 1971, p. 65.</ref> and
* a non-religious philosophical position maintaining that the Universe (in the sense of the totality of all existence) and God are identical.<ref>{{Cite book |title = The New Oxford Dictionary Of English|publisher = Clarendon Press|year = 1998|location = Oxford|page=1341|isbn=978-0-19-861263-6}}</ref>


==History== ==History==
===Pre-modern times===
The term “pantheist” — from which the word “Pantheism” was derived — was purportedly first used in English by ] writer ] in his 1705 work, ''] Truly Stated, by a pantheist''. He clarified the idea in a 1710 letter to Leibniz when he referred to “the pantheistic opinion of those who believe in no other eternal being but the universe.”<ref name="ReferenceA">Paul Harrison, Elements of Pantheism, 1999</ref> However, many earlier writers, schools of philosophy, and religious movements expressed pantheistic ideas.
Early traces of pantheist thought can be found within animistic beliefs and tribal religions throughout the world as an expression of unity with the divine, specifically in beliefs that have no central ] or ] personas. ] theology makes early recorded reference to pantheism within the ] of ], where ''pan'' (the all) is made cognate with the creator God ] (symbolizing the universe),<ref>Damascius, referring to the theology delivered by Hieronymus and Hellanicus in {{cite web|url=http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/af/af12.htm|title=''The Theogonies''|work=sacred-texts.com}}:"... the theology now under discussion celebrates as Protogonus (First-born) , and calls him Dis, as the disposer of all things, and the whole world: upon that account he is also denominated Pan."</ref> and with ], after the swallowing of Phanes.<ref>Betegh, Gábor, ''The Derveni Papyrus'', Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 176–178 {{ISBN|978-0-521-80108-9}}</ref>


Pantheistic tendencies existed in a number of ] groups, with pantheistic thought appearing throughout the ].<ref name=Worman/> These included the beliefs of mystics such as ], ], ], and ].<ref name=Worman/>{{rp|pp. 620–621}}
They include some of the ] such as ] and ]. The ] were Pantheists, beginning with ] and culminating in the emperor-philosopher ]. During the pre-Christian Roman Empire, ] was one of the three dominant schools of philosophy, along with ] and ]. The early ] of ] and ] is also pantheistic.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


The ] has long regarded pantheistic ideas as heresy.<ref>Collinge, William, ''Historical Dictionary of Catholicism'', Scarecrow Press, 2012, p 188, {{ISBN|9780810879799}}.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.catholic.com/qa/what-is-pantheism|title=What is pantheism?|work=catholic.com|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170801114835/https://www.catholic.com/qa/what-is-pantheism|archive-date=1 August 2017|df=dmy-all}}</ref> ] was considered an early Pantheist.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KPbWAAAAMAAJ&q=%22the+first+pantheist%22 |title=The Two Eyes of Spinoza & Other Essays on Philosophers – Leszek Kołakowski – Google Books |date=2009-06-11 |isbn=9781587318757 |accessdate=2022-10-08|last1=Kołakowski |first1=Leszek |publisher=St. Augustine's Press }}</ref> ], an Italian friar who evangelized about a transcendent and infinite God, was burned at the stake in 1600 by the ]. He has since become known as a celebrated pantheist and martyr of science.<ref>McIntyre, James Lewis, ''Giordano Bruno'', Macmillan, 1903, p 316.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.science20.com/science_20/bruno_was_martyr_magic_not_science-115582|title=Bruno Was a Martyr for Magic, Not Science &#124; Science 2.0|date=27 August 2014}}</ref>
In the West, Pantheism went into retreat during the Christian years between the 4th and 15th centuries, when it was regarded as heresy. The first open revival was by ] (burned at the stake in 1600). ]'s ''Ethics'', finished in 1675, was the major source from which Pantheism spread (though Spinoza himself did not use the word.) ] was influenced by both Spinoza and Bruno. In 1720 he wrote the ''Pantheisticon: or The Form of Celebrating the Socratic-Society'' in Latin.<ref>, pantheism.net</ref>


The Hindu philosophy of ] is thought to be similar to pantheism. The term ''Advaita'' (literally "non-secondness", but usually rendered as "]",{{sfn|Deutsch|1988|p=3}}{{sfn|Milne|1997}} and often equated with ]{{refn|group=note|name=Monism|Form of monism:
In 1785 a major controversy known in German as the Pantheismus-Streit between critic ] and defender ] helped to spread awareness of Pantheism to many German thinkers in the late 18th and in the 19th century.<ref>Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, in , plato.stanford.edu.</ref>
* {{harvnb|Malkovsky|2000|p=71}}: "The interpretation of advaita that is the most common equates non-duality with monism and acosmic illusionism. Only the Absolute, or the paraa brahma, is said to exist; everything else is but an illusory appearance."
* {{harvnb|Menon|2012}}: "The essential philosophy of Advaita is an idealist monism, and is considered to be presented first in the Upaniṣads and consolidated in the Brahma Sūtra by this tradition."
* {{harvnb|King|1995|p=65}}: "The prevailing monism of the Upanishads was developed by the Advaita Vedanta to its ultimate extreme."
* {{harvnb|Mohanty|1980|p=205}}: "Nyaya-Vaiseshika is realistic; Advaita Vedanta is idealistic. The former is pluralistic, the latter monistic."}}) refers to the idea that '']'' alone is ultimately ], while the transient ] is an illusory appearance ('']'') of Brahman. In this view, '']'', the experiencing self, is ultimately non-different ("na aparah") from '']-]'', the highest Self or ].{{sfn|Menon|2012}}{{sfn|Deutsch|1973|p=3, note 2; p.54}}{{sfn|Koller|2013|p=100-101}}{{refn|group=note|name=Brahman|Highest self:
* Shankara, ''Upadesasahasri'' I.18.3: "I am ever-free, the existent" ('']''). I.18.6: "The two notions "I am the Existent-''Brahman''" and "I act," have ''Atman'' as their witness. It is considered more reasonable to give up only of the two which arises from ignorance. I.18.7: "The notion, "I am the Existent," arises from right means of knowledge the other notion has its origin in fallacious means of knowledge." ({{harvnb|Mayeda|1992|p=172}})
* ''Brahmajnanavalimala'' Verse 20: "Brahman is real, the universe is mithya (it cannot be categorized as either real or unreal). The jiva is Brahman itself and not different." Translation by S. N. Sastri
* {{harvnb|Sivananda|1993|p=219}}: "Brahman (the Absolute) is alone real; this world is unreal; and the Jiva or individual soul is non-different from Brahman."
* {{harvnb|Menon|2012}}: "The experiencing self (jīva) and the transcendental self of the Universe (ātman) are in reality identical (both are Brahman), though the individual self seems different as space within a container seems different from space as such. These cardinal doctrines are represented in the anonymous verse "brahma satyam jagan mithya; jīvo brahmaiva na aparah" (Brahman is alone True, and this world of plurality is an error; the individual self is not different from Brahman)."
* {{harvnb|Deutsch|1973|p=54}}: " essential status is that of unqualified reality, of identity with the Absolute the self (''jiva'') is only misperceived: the self is really Brahman."
* {{harvnb|Koller|2013|pp=100–101}}: "Atman, which is identical to Brahman, is ultimately the only reality and the appearance of plurality is entirely the work of ignorance the self is ultimately of the nature of Atman/Brahman Brahman alone is ultimately real."
* {{harvnb|Bowker|2000a|loc="Advaita Vedanta"}}: "There is only Brahman, which is necessarily undifferentiated. It follows that there cannot even be a difference, or duality, between the human subject, or self, and Brahman, for Brahman must be that very self (since Brahman is the reality underlying all appearance). The goal of human life and wisdom must, therefore, be the realization that the self (ātman) is Brahman."
* {{harvtxt|Hacker|1995|p=88}} notes that Shankara uses two groups of words to denote 'atman': "One group - principally ''jiva'', ''vijnanatman'', and ''sarira'' - expresses the illusory aspect of the soul But in addition there are the two expressions ''atman'' and ''pratyagatman''. These also designate the individual soul, but in its real aspect." {{Harvtxt|Mayeda|1992|pp=11, 14}} uses the word ''pratyagatman''; {{harvtxt|Sivananda1993|p=219}}, {{harvtxt|Deutsch|1973|p=54}}, and {{harvtxt|Menon|2012}} use the term ''jiva'' when referring to the identity of ''atman'' and ''Brahman''.}} The ''jivatman'' or individual self is a mere reflection or limitation of singular ''Ātman'' in a multitude of apparent individual bodies.{{sfn|Indich|2000|p=50}}


===Baruch Spinoza===
For a time during the 19th century it seemed like Pantheism was the religion of the future, attracting figures such as ] and ] in Britain; ], ] and ] in Germany; ], ], and ] in the USA. Seen as a threat by the Vatican, it came under attack in the notorious ] of Pius IX.<ref>, papalencyclicals.net</ref>
]
In the West, pantheism was formalized as a separate theology and philosophy based on the work of the 17th-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza.<ref name=Picton/>{{rp|p.7}} Spinoza was a Dutch philosopher of Portuguese descent raised in the ] community in ].<ref name=tws908>{{cite news | first=Anthony |last=Gottlieb | title = God Exists, Philosophically (review of "Spinoza: A Life" by Steven Nadler) | work=The New York Times |date=18 July 1999 | url = https://www.nytimes.com/books/99/07/18/reviews/990718.18gottlit.html | access-date =7 September 2009}}</ref> He developed highly controversial ideas regarding the authenticity of the Hebrew Bible and the nature of the Divine, and was effectively excluded from Jewish society at age 23, when the ] issued a '']'' against him.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2013/septemberoctober/feature/why-spinoza-was-excommunicated|title=Why Spinoza Was Excommunicated|date=2015-09-01|website=National Endowment for the Humanities|language=en|access-date=2017-09-05|archive-date=8 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180908105602/https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2013/septemberoctober/feature/why-spinoza-was-excommunicated|url-status=dead}}</ref> A number of his books were published posthumously, and shortly thereafter included in the Catholic Church's '']''.<ref name=tws9906>{{cite news| title = Destroyer and Builder |magazine=The New Republic | date = 3 May 2012 | url = https://newrepublic.com/book/review/book-forged-hell-spinoza-treatise-steven-nadler| access-date =7 March 2013 }}</ref>


In the posthumous '']'', he opposed ]' famous ], the theory that the body and spirit are separate.<ref name=Plumptre /> Spinoza held the ] view that the two are the same, and monism is a fundamental part of his philosophy. He was described as a "God-intoxicated man," and used the word God to describe the unity of all substance.<ref name=Plumptre>{{cite book|last=Plumptre|first=Constance|title=General sketch of the history of pantheism, Volume 2|year=1879|publisher=Samuel Deacon and Co|location=London|isbn=9780766155022|pages=3–5, 8, 29}}</ref> This view influenced philosophers such as ], who said, "You are either a ] or not a philosopher at all."<ref name="Hegel's History of Philosophy">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ESNZ3TUdN40C&pg=PA144 |title=Hegel's History of Philosophy |access-date=2 May 2011| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110513033919/https://books.google.com/books?id=ESNZ3TUdN40C&pg=PA144&lpg=PA144&dq=%22you+are+either+a+spinozist+or+not+a+philosopher+at+all%22&source=bl&ots=XRsqJEbyNT&sig=bCClaJ9V6lL_CJbOR-S3zaGwHqo&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result| archive-date= 13 May 2011 | url-status= live|isbn=9780791455432 |year=2003 |publisher=SUNY Press }}</ref> Spinoza earned praise as one of the great ] of ]<ref>Scruton 1986 (2002 ed.), ch. 2, p.26</ref> and one of ]'s most important thinkers.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Gilles |last1=Deleuze|title=Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza|date=1990|publisher=Zone Books|chapter=(translator's preface)}} Referred to as "the prince" of the philosophers.</ref> Although the term "pantheism" was not coined until after his death, he is regarded as the most celebrated advocate of the concept.<ref name="Shoham 2010 111">{{cite book|last=Shoham|first=Schlomo Giora|title=To Test the Limits of Our Endurance|year=2010|publisher=Cambridge Scholars|isbn=978-1443820684|page=111}}</ref> ''Ethics'' was the major source from which Western pantheism spread.<ref name="Genevieve Lloyd 1996"/>
However, in the 20th century Pantheism was sidelined by political ideologies such as Communism and Fascism, by the traumatic upheavals of two world wars, and later by relativistic philosophies such as ] and ]. It persisted in eminent pantheists such as the novelist ], poet ], scientist ], architect ] and historian ].<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


==Recent developments== ===18th century===
The first known use of the term "pantheism" was in Latin ("pantheismus"<ref name="Taylor"/>) by the English mathematician Joseph Raphson in his work ''De Spatio Reali seu Ente Infinito'', published in 1697.<ref name=Thomson>Ann Thomson; Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment, 2008, page 54.</ref> Raphson begins with a distinction between atheistic "panhylists" (from the Greek roots '']'', "all", and '']'', "matter"), who believe everything is matter, and Spinozan "pantheists" who believe in "a certain universal substance, material as well as intelligence, that fashions all things that exist out of its own essence."<ref>{{cite book|last=Raphson|first=Joseph|title=De spatio reali|year=1697|publisher=Londini|page=2|language=la}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Suttle|first=Gary|title=Joseph Raphson: 1648–1715|url=http://naturepantheist.org/raph-son.html|publisher=Pantheist Association for Nature|access-date=7 September 2012|archive-date=7 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407140352/http://naturepantheist.org/raph-son.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> Raphson thought that the universe was immeasurable in respect to a human's capacity of understanding, and believed that humans would never be able to comprehend it.<ref>{{cite book|last=Koyré|first=Alexander|title=From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe|year=1957|publisher=Johns Hopkins Press|location=Baltimore, Md.|isbn=978-0801803475|pages=|url=https://archive.org/details/fromclosedworldt0000koyr/page/190}}</ref> He referred to the pantheism of the ], ], ], ], ], ], and Jewish ], specifically referring to Spinoza.<ref name="T Bennet">{{cite book|last1=Bennet|first1=T|title=The History of the Works of the Learned|date=1702|publisher=H.Rhodes|page=498|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zv0vAAAAYAAJ&pg=498|access-date=28 July 2017}}</ref>
In the late 20th century, Pantheism began to see a resurgence.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Pantheism chimed with the growing ecological awareness in society and the media. It was often declared to be the underlying “theology” of ].<ref>Margot Adler, Drawing Down the Moon, Beacon Press, 1986</ref> 1975 saw the foundation of the ], however it remained extremely small. The creation of the naturalistic ] in 1999, with its multiple mailing lists and social networks, led to much wider visibility.


The term was first used in English by a translation of Raphson's work in 1702. It was later used and popularized by ] writer ] in his work of 1705 ''] Truly Stated, by a Pantheist''.<ref name="Dabundo">{{cite book|last1=Dabundo|first1=Laura|title=Encyclopedia of Romanticism (Routledge Revivals)|date=2009|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1135232351|pages=442–443|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KMeOAgAAQBAJ|access-date=27 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=Worman/>{{rp|pp. 617–618}} Toland was influenced by both Spinoza and Bruno, and had read Joseph Raphson's ''De Spatio Reali'', referring to it as "the ingenious Mr. Ralphson's (sic) Book of Real Space".<ref>Daniel, Stephen H. "Toland's Semantic Pantheism," in John Toland's Christianity not Mysterious, Text, Associated Works and Critical Essays. Edited by Philip McGuinness, Alan Harrison, and Richard Kearney. Dublin, Ireland: The Lilliput Press, 1997.</ref> Like Raphson, he used the terms "pantheist" and "Spinozist" interchangeably.<ref>R.E. Sullivan, "John Toland and the Deist controversy: A Study in Adaptations", Harvard University Press, 1982, p. 193.</ref> In 1720 he wrote the ''Pantheisticon: or The Form of Celebrating the Socratic-Society'' in Latin, envisioning a pantheist society that believed, "All things in the world are one, and one is all in all things ... what is all in all things is God, eternal and immense, neither born nor ever to perish."<ref>{{cite web|last=Harrison|first=Paul|title=Toland: The father of modern pantheism|url=http://www.pantheism.net/paul/history/toland.htm|work=Pantheist History|publisher=World Pantheist Movement|access-date=5 September 2012}}</ref><ref>Toland, John, Pantheisticon, 1720; reprint of the 1751 edition, New York and London: Garland, 1976, p. 54.</ref> He clarified his idea of pantheism in a letter to ] in 1710 when he referred to "the pantheistic opinion of those who believe in no other eternal being but the universe".<ref name=Worman/><ref name="ReferenceA">Paul Harrison, ''Elements of Pantheism'', 1999.</ref><ref>Honderich, Ted, ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy'', Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 641: "First used by John Toland in 1705, the term 'pantheist' designates one who holds both that everything there is constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine."</ref><ref>Thompson, Ann, ''Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment'', Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 133, {{ISBN|9780199236190}}.</ref>
As the growing global ecological crisis increased the level of concern for Nature, the popularity and visibility of Pantheism grew further in the early 21st century. ]' ] gave ] increased credibility among atheists by describing it as “sexed-up atheism.”<ref>]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 2006.</ref> The ] gave Pantheism further prominence in a Papal encyclical of 2009<ref name="Caritas In Veritate, July 7, 2009">Caritas In Veritate, July 7, 2009</ref> and a New Year's Day statement on January 1, 2010,<ref>Message Of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI For The Celebration Of The World Day Of Peace</ref> which criticized Pantheism for denying the superiority of humans over nature and "seeing the source of man’s salvation in nature."<ref name="Caritas In Veritate, July 7, 2009"/>
James Cameron’s 2009 movie ] was widely reviewed as presenting a Pantheistic reverence and concern for Nature. ] of '']'' described the film as “Cameron’s long ] for pantheism … Hollywood’s religion of choice for a generation now”.<ref>{{cite web|last=Douthat|first=Ross|date=December 21, 2009|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/opinion/21douthat1.html?_r=1 |title=Heaven and Nature|work=]|accessdate=December 21, 2009}}</ref>


In the mid-eighteenth century, the English theologian ] defined pantheism this way: "It supposes God and nature, or God and the whole universe, to be one and the same substance—one universal being; insomuch that men's ]s are only modifications of the divine substance."<ref name="Worman">Worman, J. H., "Pantheism", in ''Cyclopædia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, Volume 1'', John McClintock, James Strong (Eds), Harper & Brothers, 1896, pp. 616–624.</ref><ref>Worman cites Waterland, Works, viii, p. 81.</ref> In the early nineteenth century, the German theologian ] defined pantheism as the belief that God and the world established by God are one and the same.<ref name=Worman/><ref>Worman cites Wegscheider, ''Institutiones theologicae dogmaticae'', p. 250.</ref>
==Varieties==
All varieties of Pantheism involve reverence for the Universe or Totality rather than for any creator being or personal God. All imply some level of unity in reality. All have a strong emphasis on Nature as a focus of spirituality and of ethics. There are three major categories of Pantheism, which differ as to whether they regard reality as made up of only one type of substance, or two, and what that type of substance is.<ref>Paul Harrison, Elements of Pantheism, Element Books (1999)</ref>


Between 1785–89, a controversy about Spinoza's philosophy arose between the German philosophers ] (a critic) and ] (a defender). Known in German as the '']'' (pantheism controversy), it helped spread pantheism to many German thinkers.<ref>{{cite web | last1=Giovanni | first1=di | last2=Livieri | first2=Paolo | title=Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi | website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | date=2001-12-06 | url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/friedrich-jacobi/ | access-date=2021-09-25}}</ref>
* Monist physicalist or ] holds that there is only one type of substance, and that substance is physical, i.e. energy and matter. Historically this version was held by Stoics such as ] or ], and in modern times by ], ], ] and ]. This version is represented today by the ]. In this version, the term ''god'' — if used at all — is basically a synonym for Nature or Universe, seen from the point of view of reverence.
* Monist idealist Pantheism holds that there is only one type of substance, and that substance is mental or spiritual. Ultimate reality consists of a single consciousness. This version is common in Hindu philosophies and Consciousness-Only schools of ], as well as in some ] writers such as ].
* Dualist Pantheism holds that there are two major types of substance, physical and mental/spiritual. Dualistic pantheism is very diverse, and may include beliefs in reincarnation, ], and paranormal connections across Nature. It is represented most widely today in literal versions of ].


==Issues== ===19th century===
===Use of religious vocabulary===
A significant debate within the pantheistic community is about the use of the word “God.” Pantheists do not believe in a God in the common and traditional sense of a personal creator being. Some modern Pantheists avoid using God-words altogether, since they regard them as misleading. Others feel that the word God is essential to express the strength of their feelings towards Nature and the Universe.


====Growing influence====
Some critics have argued that pantheism is little more than a redefinition of the word “God” to mean “Nature,” “Universe”, or “]”.{{Citation needed|date=October 2009}} However, in Pantheism the word God, when used, is more an expression of the user’s feelings rather than of some supernatural power in the Universe. {{Citation needed|date=October 2009}}
During the beginning of the 19th century, pantheism was the viewpoint of many leading writers and philosophers, attracting figures such as ] and ] in Britain; ], Schelling and Hegel in Germany; ] in Norway; and ], ] and ] in the United States. Seen as a growing threat by the Vatican, in 1864 it was formally condemned by ] in the '']''.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Pope BI. Pius IX|title=Syllabus of Errors 1.1|url=http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9syll.htm|website=Papal Encyclicals Online|access-date=28 July 2017|date=9 June 1862}}</ref>


A letter written in 1886 by ], ]'s law partner, was sold at auction for US$30,000 in 2011.<ref name=Letter>{{cite web|title=Sold – Herndon's Revelations on Lincoln's Religion|url=http://www.raabcollection.com/abraham-lincoln-autograph/Abraham-Lincoln-Autograph-Religion/|publisher=Raab Collection|access-date=5 June 2012|first=William|last=Herndon|format=Excerpt and review|date=4 February 1866}}</ref> In it, Herndon writes of the U.S. President's ], which included pantheism.
When pantheism is considered as an alternative to theism there is a denial of theistic claims. For example, theism is the belief in a “personal” God that ] (is separate from) the world. Pantheists deny the existence of a personal God. They deny the existence of a “minded” Being that has intentional states and associated capacities such as the ability to make decisions.
{{blockquote|"Mr. Lincoln's religion is too well known to me to allow of even a shadow of a doubt; he is or was a Theist and a Rationalist, denying all extraordinary – supernatural inspiration or revelation. At one time in his life, to say the least, he was an elevated Pantheist, doubting the immortality of the soul as the Christian world understands that term. He believed that the soul lost its identity and was immortal as a force. Subsequent to this he rose to the belief of a God, and this is all the change he ever underwent."<ref name=Letter /><ref name=Lincoln>{{cite news|last=Adams|first=Guy|title='Pantheist' Lincoln would be unelectable today|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pantheist-lincoln-would-be-unelectable-today-2269024.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220524/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pantheist-lincoln-would-be-unelectable-today-2269024.html |archive-date=24 May 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=5 June 2012|newspaper=The Independent|date=17 April 2011|location=Los Angeles}}</ref>}}


The subject is understandably controversial, but the content of the letter is consistent with Lincoln's fairly lukewarm approach to organized religion.<ref name=Lincoln />
There are disagreements as to whether Pantheism is atheistic or not. Atheists argue the non-theistic god of pantheism is not a ] (according to the traditional definition),<ref>{{Citation|first=R|last=Dawkins|title=]|publisher=Transworld, a Black Swan Book|year=2006|ISBN=978-0-552-77331-7}} “Pantheism is sexed-up atheism”</ref> while others suggest a deity is not necessarily transcendent.<ref name="SEP">“With some exceptions, pantheism is non-theistic, but it is not atheistic.” ], , plato.stanford.edu</ref>


====Comparison with non-Christian religions====
==Similar concepts in other religious traditions==
Some 19th-century theologians thought that various pre-Christian religions and philosophies were pantheistic. They thought Pantheism was similar to the ancient Hinduism<ref name=Worman/>{{rp|pp. 618}} philosophy of ] (non-dualism).<ref>Literary Remains of the Late Professor Theodore Goldstucker, W. H. Allen, 1879. p. 32.</ref>
{{God}}


19th-century European theologians also considered ] to contain pantheistic elements and pointed to Egyptian philosophy as a source of Greek Pantheism.<ref name=Worman/>{{rp|pp. 618–620}} The latter included some of the ], such as ] and ].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=Thilly |first=Frank |title=Pantheism |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Part 18 |editor-last=Hastings |editor-first=James |publisher=Kessinger Publishing |date=2003 |orig-year=1908 |page=614 |isbn=9780766136953}}</ref> The ] were pantheists, beginning with ] and culminating in the emperor-philosopher ]. During the pre-Christian Roman Empire, ] was one of the three dominant schools of philosophy, along with ] and ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Armstrong|first=AH|title=The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy|year=1967|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978052104-0549|pages=57, 60, 161, 186, 222}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=McLynn|first=Frank|title=Marcus Aurelius: A Life|year=2010|publisher=Da Capo Press|isbn=9780306819162|page=232}}</ref> The early ] of ] and ] is also sometimes considered pantheistic, although it could be more similar to ].<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
===Taoism===
] is pantheistic at least in the writings of its leading thinkers ] and ], although it later developed into a folk religion with many deities.<br />
The ] by Laozi never speaks of a personal or creator God. Its central focus, the ] or Way, is conceived of as a mysterious and numinous unity, infinite and eternal, underlying all things and sustaining them. The Tao is always spoken of with profound religious reverence and respect, similar to the way that Pantheism discusses the "divinity" of the Universe.<ref>Paul Harrison, Elements of Pantheism, Element Books, 1999</ref> The ideal of Taoism was to live in harmony with the Tao and to cultivate a simple and frugal life, avoiding unnecessary action: "Being one with nature, he is in accord with the Tao."<ref>Tao te Ching, 16</ref><br />
Zhuangzi emphasized the pantheistic content of Taoism even more clearly. "Heaven and I were created together, and all things and I are one." When Tung Kuo Tzu asked Zhuangzi where the Tao was, he replied that it was in the ant, the grass, the clay tile, even in excrement: "There is nowhere where it is not… There is not a single thing without Tao."<ref>, pantheism.net</ref>


], which arose in the ] Dynasty of Korea, and ] are also considered pantheistic. The ] believes that the ] of the self-aware universe is reality, which is an alternative view of Pantheism.<ref>{{cite web |title=About Realism |publisher=The Realist Society of Canada |url=http://www.realistsocietyofcanada.com/ |access-date=5 February 2022}}</ref>
===Hinduism===
It is generally asserted that Hindu religious texts are the oldest known literature that contains Pantheistic ideas.<ref>''General Sketch of the History of Pantheism'' p. 29</ref> In Hindu ], ] is the unchanging, infinite, immanent, and transcendent reality which is the Divine Ground of all things in this Universe, and is also the sum total of all that ever is, was, or ever shall be. The word, Brahman, is derived from the main creator god in the Vedas, Brahma. “poornamadah poornamidam” which in Sanskrit means “That is whole, this is whole.” This idea of pantheism is traceable from some of the more ancient ] and ] to later ] philosophy. All ] of the Upanishads, in one way or another, seem to indicate the unity of the world with the Brahman. ] Upanishad says “All this Universe indeed is Brahman; from him does it proceed; into him it is dissolved; in him it breathes, so let every one adore him calmly”. It further says “This whole universe is Brahman, from Brahman to a clod of earth. Brahman is both the efficient and the material cause of the world. He is the potter by whom the vase is formed; He is the clay from which it is fabricated. Everything proceeds from Him, without waste or diminution of the source, as light radiates from sun. Everything merges into Him again, as bubbles bursting mingle with air{{ndash}} as rivers fall into the ocean. Everything proceeds from and returns to Him, as the web of the spider is emitted from and retracted into itself.”<ref>Chandogya Upanishad 3-14 Williams Translation</ref> In the hymns of the ], a pantheistic strain of thought may be discernible in the tenth book (10-121).


===20th century===
This concept of God is of one unity, with the individual personal gods being aspects of the One; thus, different deities are seen by different adherents as particularly well suited to their worship. As the sun has rays of light which emanate from the same source, the same holds true for the multifaceted aspects of God emanating from Brahman, like many colors of the same prism.Also Hindus worship Nature by offering prayers to sacred trees, groves and also to animals. It’s believed widely among Hindus that God lives in all, a very pantheistic belief. ], specifically, ], is a branch of ] which gives this matter a greater focus. Most Vedantic adherents are ] or “non-]” (i.e. ]), seeing multiple manifestations of the one God or source of being, a view which is often considered by non-Hindus as being ]. Several aspects of Nature ranging from astronomical bodies, rivers, mountains and trees are also revered in Hindu scripture and worship.
In the late 20th century, some declared that pantheism was an underlying theology of ],<ref>{{cite book |first=Margot |last=Adler |title=Drawing Down the Moon |publisher=Beacon Press |date=1986}}</ref> and pantheists began forming organizations devoted specifically to pantheism and treating it as a separate religion.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
]'s ''Luminaries of Pantheism'' mural in Venice, California, for ]]]


===21st century===
Pantheism is a key component of ] philosophy. Other subdivisions of Vedanta do not strictly hold this tenet. For example, the ] school of ] holds Brahman to be the external personal God ], whereas the theistic school of ] espouses ].
]
], son of scientist and science communicator ], published the 2007 book ''Dazzle Gradually: Reflections on the Nature of Nature'', co-written with his mother ]. In the chapter "Truth of My Father", Sagan writes that his "father believed in the God of Spinoza and Einstein, God not behind nature, but as nature, equivalent to it."<ref>Sagan, Dorion, "Dazzle Gradually: Reflections on the Nature of Nature" 2007, p. 14.</ref>


In 2009, pantheism was mentioned in a ]<ref name=Caritas>Caritas In Veritate, 7 July 2009.</ref> and in a statement on New Year's Day, 2010,<ref>{{Cite web |title=43rd World Day of Peace 2010, If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation {{!}} BENEDICT XVI |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20091208_xliii-world-day-peace.html |access-date=2023-06-28 |website=www.vatican.va}}</ref> criticizing pantheism for denying the superiority of humans over nature and seeing the source of man{{'s}} salvation in nature.<ref name=Caritas/>
===Other religions===
There are many elements of pantheism in some forms of ], ], and ] as well as in several tendencies in the major theistic religions. See also the Neopagan section of ] and the ].


In 2015, ], an organization "dedicated to celebrating and spreading awareness about pantheism," commissioned Los Angeles muralist ] to paint the 75-foot mural in ], California, near the organization's offices.<ref name="vp">{{cite web |title=New Mural in Vence: "Luminaries of Pantheism" |url=https://www.venicepaparazzi.com/recent-events-covered/new-mural-in-venice-inspiration-of-pantheism/ |publisher=VenicePaparazzi |access-date=15 October 2020}}</ref> The mural depicts ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Rod|first=Perry|title=About the Paradise Project|url=https://pantheism.com/about/pantheismcom/|publisher=The Paradise Project|access-date=21 June 2017}}</ref><ref name="Pantheist Vision">{{cite journal |last1=Wood |first1=Harold |title=New Online Pantheism Community Seeks Common Ground |journal=Pantheist Vision |date=Summer 2017 |volume=34 |issue=2 |page=5}}</ref>
Many ] consider themselves pantheists. The Islamic religious tradition, in particular ] has a strong belief in the ] of the universe and the concept that everything in it is an aspect of God itself. Many traditional and folk religions including ] and ] can be seen as pantheistic, or a mixture of pantheism and other doctrines such as ] and ].

==Categorizations==
There are multiple varieties of pantheism<ref name=Worman/><ref name="Stanford">{{cite encyclopedia|last=Levine|first=Michael|title=Pantheism|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pantheism/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|year=2020}}</ref>{{rp|3}} and various systems of classifying them relying upon one or more spectra or in discrete categories.

===Degree of determinism===
The philosopher ] used the term ] to describe the ] philosophies of Baruch Spinoza, the Stoics, and other like-minded figures.<ref>{{cite book|title=Philosophers Speak of God|url=https://archive.org/details/philosophersspea009720mbp|url-access=limited|year=1953|publisher=University of Chicago Press|location=Chicago|pages=–210|editor=Charles Hartshorne and William Reese}}</ref> Pantheism (All-is-God) is often associated with ] (All-is-One) and some have suggested that it logically implies determinism (All-is-Now).<ref name=Plumptre/><ref name="Goldsmith">{{cite book|last=Goldsmith|first=Donald|title=E = Einstein: His Life, His Thought, and His Influence on Our Culture|year=2006|publisher=Stirling Publishing|location=New York|page=187|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zGzcV40b3IkC&pg=PA187|author2=Marcia Bartusiak|isbn=9781402763199}}</ref><ref>F.C. Copleston, "Pantheism in Spinoza and the German Idealists," Philosophy 21, 1946, p. 48.</ref><ref>Literary and Philosophical Society of Liverpool, "Proceedings of the Liverpool Literary & Philosophical Society, Volumes 43–44", 1889, p. 285.</ref><ref>John Ferguson, "The Religions of the Roman Empire", Cornell University Press, 1970, p. 193.</ref> Albert Einstein explained ] by stating,<ref>{{cite book|last=Isaacson|first=Walter|title=Einstein: His Life and Universe|year=2007|publisher=Simon and Schuster |url=https://archive.org/details/einsteinhislifeu0000isaa |url-access=registration|page= |quote=I am a determinist.|isbn=9781416539322}}</ref> "the past, present, and future are an 'illusion{{'"}}. This form of pantheism has been referred to as "extreme monism", in which{{spaced ndash}} in the words of one commentator{{spaced ndash}} "God decides or determines everything, including our supposed decisions."<ref>{{cite book|title=Encyclopedia of Religion: Volume 10|year=2005|publisher=MacMillan|location=USA|isbn=978-0028657332|edition=2nd|editor=Lindsay Jones|url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofre0000unse_v8f2}}</ref> Other examples of determinism-inclined pantheisms include those of ],<ref>Dependence and Freedom: The Moral Thought of Horace Bushnell by David Wayne Haddorff Emerson's belief was "monistic determinism".

* Creatures of Prometheus: Gender and the Politics of Technology by Timothy Vance Kaufman-Osborn, Prometheus ((Writer)) "Things are in a saddle, and ride mankind."
* Emerson's position is "soft determinism" (a variant of determinism) .
* "The 'fate' Emerson identifies is an underlying determinism." (Fate is one of Emerson's essays) .</ref> and Hegel.<ref>Hegel was a determinist" (also called a combatibilist a.k.a. soft determinist).

"Hegel and Marx are usually cited as the greatest proponents of historical determinism." </ref>

However, some have argued against treating every meaning of "unity" as an aspect of pantheism,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Levine|first=Michael P.|title=Pantheism, substance and unity|journal=International Journal for Philosophy of Religion|date=August 1992|volume=32|issue=1|pages=1–23|jstor=40036697|doi=10.1007/bf01313557|s2cid=170517621}}</ref> and there exist versions of pantheism that regard determinism as an inaccurate or incomplete view of nature. Examples include the beliefs of ],<ref>{{Citation |last1=Moran |first1=Dermot |title=John Scottus Eriugena |date=2019 |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/scottus-eriugena/ |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Winter 2019 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2020-03-19 |last2=Guiu |first2=Adrian}}</ref> ] and ].<ref>* Theories of the will in the history of philosophy by Archibald Alexander p. 307 Schelling holds "...that the will is not determined but self-determined."
* The Dynamic Individualism of William James by James O. Pawelski p. 17 " fight against determinism" "My first act of free will shall be to believe in free will."
</ref>

===Degree of belief===
It may also be possible to distinguish two types of pantheism, one being more religious and the other being more philosophical. The Columbia Encyclopedia writes of the distinction:
:"If the pantheist starts with the belief that the one great reality, eternal and infinite, is God, he sees everything finite and temporal as but some part of God. There is nothing separate or distinct from God, for God is the universe. If, on the other hand, the conception taken as the foundation of the system is that the great inclusive unity is the world itself, or the universe, God is swallowed up in that unity, which may be designated nature."<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Pantheism|url=http://www.answers.com/topic/pantheism|encyclopedia=The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition|publisher=Columbia University Press|access-date=13 June 2012|year=2012}}</ref>

===Form of monism===
]
Philosophers and theologians have often suggested that pantheism implies ].<ref name="Deity1">{{cite book |last=Owen |first=H. P. |title=Concepts of Deity |location=London |publisher=Macmillan |date=1971 |page=67}}</ref> {{refn|group=note|Different types of monism include:{{sfn|Urmson|1991|p=297}}<ref name=Schaffer>{{cite web |last=Schaffer |first=Jonathan |title=Monism: The Priority of the Whole |url=http://www.jonathanschaffer.org/monism.pdf |website=johnathanschaeffer.org |access-date=5 February 2022}}</ref>

# ] monism, "the view that the apparent plurality of substances is due to different states or appearances of a single substance".{{sfn|Urmson|1991|p=297}}
# Attributive monism, "the view that whatever the number of substances, they are of a single ultimate kind".{{sfn|Urmson|1991|p=297}}
# Partial monism, "within a given realm of being (however many there may be) there is only one substance".{{sfn|Urmson|1991|p=297}}
# Existence monism, the view that there is only one concrete object ] (The One, "Τὸ Ἕν" or the ]).<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=Schaffer |first=Jonathan |title=Monism |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=19 March 2007 |edition=Summer 2015 |editor-first=Edward N. |editor-last=Zalta |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/monism/}}</ref>
# Priority monism, "the whole is prior to its parts" or "the world has parts, but the parts are dependent fragments of an integrated whole."<ref name="Schaffer"/>
# Property monism: the view that all properties are of a single type (e.g. only physical properties exist).
# Genus monism: "the doctrine that there is a highest category; e.g., being".<ref name="Schaffer"/>

Views contrasting with monism are:
* ], which asserts that there are two ultimately irreconcilable substances or realities such as Good and Evil, for example, ].{{sfn|Brugger|1972}}
* ], which asserts three or more fundamental substances or realities.{{sfn|Brugger|1972}}
* ], negates any of the above categories (substances, properties, concrete objects, etc.).

Monism in modern ] can be divided into three broad categories:
# ], phenomenalism, or ] monism, which holds that only mind or spirit is real.{{sfn|Brugger|1972}}
# ], which holds that one sort of thing fundamentally exists,{{sfn|Mandik|2010|p=76}} to which both the mental and the physical can be reduced.
# ] (also called ] and ]), which holds that only the physical is real, and that the mental or spiritual can be reduced to the physical:{{sfn|Brugger|1972}}{{sfn|Mandik|2010|p=76}}
::a. ], according to which everything is physical and mental things do not exist.{{sfn|Mandik|2010|p=76}}
::b. ], according to which mental things do exist and are a kind of physical thing,{{sfn|Mandik|2010|p=76}} Such as ], ] and ].

Certain positions do not fit easily into the above categories, such as functionalism, ], and ]. Moreover, they do not define the meaning of "real".}}

For the ] '']'' was the metaphysical omnipresence creating the cosmos and all its contents ''from within'' itself as well as ''out of'' itself. This is conceptualized in a kind of monistic pantheism as manifest in the supreme god ], as well as a large pantheon of lesser gods and idealizations of natural phenomena.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Maffie |first=James |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qhkh2 |title=Aztec Philosophy: Understanding a World in Motion |date=2014 |publisher=University Press of Colorado |isbn=978-1-60732-222-1}}</ref>

===Other===
In 1896, J. H. Worman, a theologian, identified seven categories of pantheism: Mechanical or materialistic (God the mechanical unity of existence); Ontological (fundamental unity, Spinoza); Dynamic; Psychical (God is the soul of the world); Ethical (God is the universal moral order, Fichte); Logical (Hegel); and Pure (absorption of God into nature, which Worman equates with atheism).<ref name=Worman/>

In 1984, ], professor of biblical and systematic theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, also identified seven: Hylozoistic; Immanentistic; Absolutistic monistic; Relativistic monistic; Acosmic; Identity of opposites; and Neoplatonic or emanationistic.<ref>'']'', edited by Walter A. Elwell, p. 887.</ref>

== Demographics ==

=== Prevalence ===
According to censuses of 2011, the UK was the country with the most Pantheists.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://pantheism.net/groups/pantheists-worldwide/ | title=Pantheists Around the World }}</ref> As of 2011, about 1,000 Canadians identified their religion as "Pantheist", representing 0.003% of the population.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|date=8 May 2013|title=2011 National Household Survey: Data tables|url=https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/dt-td/Rp-eng.cfm?TABID=1&LANG=E&A=R&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=01&GL=-1&GID=1118296&GK=1&GRP=0&O=D&PID=105399&PRID=0&PTYPE=105277&S=0&SHOWALL=0&SUB=0&Temporal=2013&THEME=95&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=&D1=0&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=0&D6=0 |publisher=Statistics Canada |access-date=6 February 2022}}</ref> By 2021, the number of Canadian pantheists had risen to 1,855 (0.005%).<ref name=":03">{{Cite web |last=Government of Canada |first=Statistics Canada |date=2022-10-26 |title=Religion by visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts |url=https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=9810034201 |access-date=2022-12-31 |website=www150.statcan.gc.ca}}</ref> In Ireland, Pantheism rose from 202 in 1991,<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249058598 |title=Changing Religions in the Republic of Ireland, 1991–2002 |journal=Irish Geography |date=January 2006 |last=Gilmour |first=Desmond A. |volume=39 |issue=2 |pages=111–128 |doi=10.1080/00750770609555871}}</ref> to 1106 in 2002,<ref name=":1" /> to 1,691 in 2006,<ref name=":4">{{cite web |url=https://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/census/census2006results/volume13/volume_13_religion.pdf |title=Census 2006: Volume 13 – Religion |publisher=Central Statistics Office |location=Dublin, Ireland |date=2007 |access-date=6 February 2022}}</ref> 1,940 in 2011.<ref name=":2">{{cite web |url=https://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/census/documents/census2011profile7/Profile_7_Education_Ethnicity_and_Irish_Traveller_Tables_and_appendices.pdf |title=Statistical Tables |website=cso.ie |page=47 |access-date=6 February 2022}}</ref>{{needs update|date=March 2022}} In New Zealand, there was exactly one pantheist man in 1901.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www3.stats.govt.nz/historic_publications/1901-census/1901-results-census/1901-results-census.html |title=Results of a Census of the Colony of New Zealand Taken for the Night of the 31st March 1901 |publisher=Statistics New Zealand |access-date=6 February 2022}}</ref> By 1906, the number of pantheists in New Zealand had septupled to 7 (6 male, 1 female).<ref>{{cite web |date=29 April 1906|title=Results of a Census of the Colony of New Zealand Taken for the Night of the 29th April, 1906.|url=https://www3.stats.govt.nz/historic_publications/1906-census/1906-results-census/1906-results-census.html |publisher=Statistics New Zealand |access-date=6 February 2022}}</ref> This number had further risen to 366 by 2006.<ref name=":3">2006 New Zealand census.</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!Country
!Subdivision(s)
!Number
!Year
!Ref
|-
|{{Flag|Australia}}
|
|1,394 (0.006%)
|2011
|<ref>2011 Australia Census</ref>
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|
|1,855 (0.005%)
|2021
|<ref name=":03" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Quebec}}
|75 (0.001%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Ontario}}
|295 (0.002%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Nova Scotia}}
|30 (0.003%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|New Brunswick}}
|45 (0.006%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Manitoba}}
|40 (0.003%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|British Columbia}}
|395 (0.008%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Prince Edward Island}}
|0 (0%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Saskatchewan}}
|25 (0.002%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Alberta}}
|125 (0.004%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Newfoundland and Labrador}}
|0 (0%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Northwest Territories}}
|0 (0%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Yukon}}
|0 (0%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Canada}}
|{{Flag|Nunavut}}
|0 (0%)
|2011
|<ref name=":0" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|
|1,940 (0.04%)
|2011
|<ref name=":2" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|]
|179 (0.04%)
|2006
|<ref name=":4" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|]
|524
|2006
|<ref name=":4" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|]
|177
|2006
|<ref name=":4" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|]
|118
|2006
|<ref name=":4" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|]
|173
|2006
|<ref name=":4" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|]
|270
|2006
|<ref name=":4" />
|-
|{{Flag|Ireland}}
|]
|181
|2006
|<ref name=":4" />
|-
|{{Flag|New Zealand}}
|
|366 (0.009%)
|2006
|<ref name=":3" />
|-
|{{Flag|United Kingdom}}
|{{Flag|Scotland}}
|60 (0.001%)
|2001
|<ref>2001 Scotland Census</ref>
|-
|{{Flag|United Kingdom}}
|{{Flag|England}} and {{Flag|Wales}}
|2,216 (0.004%)
|2011
|<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bristol.gov.uk/documents/20182/34008/Key%20Statistics%20Religion_0.pdf/370b3935-a399-4734-ad3b-04e8f6996a5d |title=2011 Census: Religion |publisher=Census Office for National Statistics |date=2011 |access-date=6 February 2022}}</ref>
|-
|{{Flag|United Kingdom}}
|]
|29 (0.002%)
|2011
|<ref name="ni2011">{{cite web|title=Census 2011: Religion – Full Detail: QS218NI – Northern Ireland|url=http://www.ninis2.nisra.gov.uk/Download/Census%202011_Excel/2011/QS218NI.xls|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131110173315/http://www.ninis2.nisra.gov.uk/Download/Census%202011_Excel/2011/QS218NI.xls|archive-date=10 November 2013|access-date=1 October 2013|publisher=nisra.gov.uk}}</ref>
|-
|{{Flag|Uruguay}}
|
|790 (0.02%)
|2006
|<ref>2006 Uruguay Census</ref>
|}

=== Age, ethnicity, and gender ===
The ] showed that pantheists were somewhat more likely to be in their 20s and 30s compared to the general population. People under 15 were about four times less likely to be pantheist than the general population.<ref name=":02">{{Cite web |last=Government of Canada |first=Statistics Canada |date=2022-10-26 |title=Religion by visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts |url=https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=9810034201 |access-date=2022-12-31 |website=www150.statcan.gc.ca}}</ref>

The 2021 Canadian census also showed that pantheists were less likely to be part of a recognized minority group compared to the general population, with 90.3% of pantheists not being part of any minority group (compared to 73.5% of the general population). The census did not register any pantheists who were ], Southeast Asian, West Asian, ], or ].<ref name=":02" />

In Canada (2011), there was no gender difference in regards to pantheism.<ref name=":0" /> However, in Ireland (2011), pantheists were slightly more likely to be female (1074 pantheists, 0.046% of women) than male (866 pantheists, 0.038% of men).<ref name=":2" /> In contrast, Canada (2021) showed pantheists to be slightly more likely to be male, with men representing 51.5% of pantheists.<ref name=":02" />
{| class="wikitable"
! colspan="4" |Comparison of pantheists in Canada against the general population (2021)<ref name=":02" />
|-
! colspan="2" |
!General population
!Pantheists
|-
! colspan="2" |Total population
|36,328,480
|1,855
|-
! rowspan="2" |Gender
!Male
|17,937,165 (49.4%)
|955 (51.5%)
|-
!Female
|18,391,315 (50.6%)
|895 (48.2%)
|-
! rowspan="8" |Age
!0 to 14
|5,992,555 (16.5%)
|75 (4%)
|-
!15 to 19
|2,003,200 (5.5%)
|40 (2%)
|-
!20 to 24
|2,177,860 (6%)
|125 (6.7%)
|-
!25 to 34
|4,898,625 (13.5%)
|405 (21.8%)
|-
!35 to 44
|4,872,425 (13.4%)
|380 (20.5%)
|-
!45 to 54
|4,634,850 (12.8%)
|245 (13.2%)
|-
!55 to 64
|5,162,365 (14.2%)
|245 13.2%)
|-
!65 and over
|6,586,600 (18.1%)
|325 (17.5%)
|-
! rowspan="13" |Ethnicity
!Non-minority
|26,689,275 (73.5%)
|1,675 (90.3%)
|-
!South Asian
|2,571,400 (7%)
|20 (1.1%)
|-
!Chinese
|1,715,770 (4.7%)
|45 (2.4%)
|-
!Black
|1,547,870 (4.3%)
|45 (2.4%)
|-
!Filipino
|957,355 (2.6%)
|10 (0.5%)
|-
!Arab
|694,015 (1.9%)
|0 (0%)
|-
!Latin American
|580,235 (1.6%)
|25 (1.3%)
|-
!Southeast Asian
|390,340 (1.1%)
|0 (0%)
|-
!West Asian
|360,495 (1%)
|0 (0%)
|-
!Korean
|218,140 (0.6%)
|0 (0%)
|-
!Japanese
|98,890 (0.3%)
|0 (0%)
|-
!Visible minority, n.i.e.
|172,885 (0.5%)
|0 (0%)
|-
!Multiple visible minorities
|331,805 (0.9%)
|15 (0.8%)
|}
]


== Related concepts == == Related concepts ==
] or nature mysticism is often conflated and confused with pantheism. It is pointed out by at least one expert, Harold Wood, founder of the ], that in pantheist philosophy Spinoza's identification of God with nature is very different from a recent idea of a self identifying pantheist with environmental ethical concerns. His use of the word ] to describe his worldview may be vastly different from the "nature" of modern sciences. He and other nature mystics who also identify as pantheists use "nature" to refer to the limited ] (as opposed to man-made ]). This use of "nature" is different from the broader use from Spinoza and other pantheists describing natural laws and the overall phenomena of the physical world. Nature mysticism may be compatible with pantheism but it may also be compatible with theism and other views.<ref name="LevineDetailed">{{harvnb|Levine|1994|pp=44, 274–275}}:
===Panentheism===

The term ] (from Greek πᾶν (pân) "all"; ἐν (en) "in"; and θεός (theós) "God"; "all-in-God") was formally coined in Germany in the 19th Century, to express a belief part way between traditional theism and pantheism, that God is omnipresent in the Universe, but also extends beyond the Universe and created the Universe.<ref>John W. Cooper, ''The Other God of the Philosophers'', Baker Academic, 2006, p 27</ref> Thus ] is not compatible with Pantheism, in which God and the universe are synonymous — with no part of God considered as being outside of the Universe.<ref>, atheism.about.com. About Agnosticism/Atheism. Retrieved 2 October 2009.</ref><ref>{{cite book
* "The idea that Unity that is rooted in nature is what types of nature mysticism (e.g. Wordsworth, Robinson Jeffers, Gary Snyder) have in common with more philosophically robust versions of pantheism. It is why nature mysticism and philosophical pantheism are often conflated and confused for one another."
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=sCY4sAjTGIYC&pg=PA21
* " pantheism is distant from Spinoza's identification of God with nature, and much closer to nature mysticism. In fact it is nature mysticism."
|title= The Encyclopedia of Christianity pg. 21
* "Nature mysticism, however, is as compatible with theism as it is with pantheism."</ref> Pantheism has also been involved in ] especially in primal religions.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K0_dHrRY3gIC&dq=%22pantheism%22+%22animal+worship%22&pg=PA4 |title=World Religions at Your Fingertips – Michael McDowell, Nathan Robert Brown – Google Books |isbn=9781592578467 |accessdate=2022-10-08|last1=McDowell |first1=Michael |last2=Brown |first2=Nathan Robert |year=2009 |publisher=Penguin }}</ref>
|publisher= Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing

|author = Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley, David B. Barrett
] is an umbrella term which has been used to refer to a variety of religions not fitting traditional theism, and under which pantheism has been included.<ref name="LevineDetailed"/>
|year = 1999

|isbn = 0802824161}}
] (from Greek πᾶν (pân) "all"; ἐν (en) "in"; and θεός (theós) "God"; "all-in-God") was formally coined in Germany in the 19th century in an attempt to offer a philosophical synthesis between traditional theism and pantheism, stating that God is substantially ] in the physical universe but also exists "apart from" or "beyond" it as its Creator and Sustainer.<ref name="Cooper">{{cite book |first=John W. |last=Cooper |title=The Other God of the Philosophers |publisher=Baker Academic |date=2006}}</ref>{{rp|p.27}} Thus panentheism separates itself from pantheism, positing the extra claim that God exists above and beyond the world as we know it.{{sfn|Levine|1994|p=11}} The line between pantheism and panentheism can be blurred depending on varying definitions of God, so there have been disagreements when assigning particular notable figures to pantheism or panentheism.<ref name="Cooper" />{{rp|pp. 71–72, 87–88, 105}}<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |title=Genealogy to Iqbal |year=1998 |editor-first=Edward |editor-last=Craig |page=100 |isbn=9780415073103 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5m5z_ca-qDkC}}</ref>
</ref> For the same reasons, ] is ''not'' a form of Pantheism, but instead is simply a form of ] which uses some pantheistic terminology while still including a Creator-deity which is at some point distinct from the Universe.

] is another word derived from pantheism, and is characterized as a combination of reconcilable elements of pantheism and ].<ref>{{cite book|title=The History of Science: A Beginner's Guide|page=|first=Sean F. |last=Johnston|year=2009|isbn=978-1-85168-681-0|url=https://archive.org/details/historyofscience0000john/page/90}}</ref> It assumes a Creator-deity that is at some point distinct from the universe and then transforms into it, resulting in a universe similar to the pantheistic one in present essence, but differing in origin.

] is the philosophical view that consciousness, ], or soul is a universal feature of all things.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Seager |first1=William |last2=Allen-Hermanson |first2=Sean |title=Panpsychism |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=23 May 2001 |edition=Winter 2012 |editor-first=Edward N. |editor-last=Zalta |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/panpsychism/}}</ref> Some pantheists also subscribe to the distinct philosophical views ] (or panvitalism), the view that everything is alive, and its close neighbor ], the view that everything has a soul or spirit.<ref>{{cite book |last=Haught |first=John F. |date=1990 |title=What Is Religion?: An Introduction |publisher=Paulist Press |page=19}}</ref>

==Pantheism in religion==

===Traditional religions===
Many traditional and folk religions including ]<ref>{{cite journal|last=Parrinder|first=EG|title=Monotheism and Pantheism in Africa|journal=Journal of Religion in Africa|year=1970|volume=3|issue=2|pages=81–88|jstor=1594816|doi=10.1163/157006670x00099}}</ref> and ]{{sfn|Levine|1994|p=67}}<ref>{{cite web|last=Harrison|first=Paul|title=North American Indians: the spirituality of nature|url=http://www.pantheism.net/paul/history/native-americans.htm|publisher=World Pantheist Movement|access-date=7 September 2012}}</ref> can be seen as pantheistic, or a mixture of pantheism and other doctrines such as ] and ]. According to pantheists, there are elements of pantheism in some forms of ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Harrison|first=Paul|title=The origins of Christian pantheism|url=http://www.pantheism.net/paul/history/gospel.htm|work=Pantheist history|publisher=World Pantheists Movement|access-date=20 September 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Fox|first=Michael W.|title=Christianity and Pantheism|url=http://pantheist.net/society/christianity_and_pan_fox.html|publisher=Universal Pantheist Society|access-date=20 September 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010309032933/http://pantheist.net/society/christianity_and_pan_fox.html|archive-date=9 March 2001|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Zaleha|first=Bernard|title=Recovering Christian Pantheism as the Lost Gospel of Creation|url=http://www.christianecology.org/ConsiderLillies.html|publisher=Fund for Christian Ecology, Inc.|access-date=20 September 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120717012801/http://www.christianecology.org/ConsiderLillies.html|archive-date=17 July 2012|df=dmy-all}}</ref>

Ideas resembling pantheism existed in ] before the 18th century (notably ], ], and ]). Although there is no evidence that these influenced Spinoza's work, there is such evidence regarding other contemporary philosophers, such as Leibniz, and later Voltaire.<ref>{{Cite journal|jstor = 1397760|title = Leibniz's Interpretation of Neo-Confucianism|journal = Philosophy East and West|volume = 21|issue = 1|pages = 3–22|last1 = Mungello|first1 = David E|doi = 10.2307/1397760|year = 1971}}</ref><ref>Lan, Feng (2005). ''Ezra Pound and Confucianism: remaking humanism in the face of modernity''. University of Toronto Press. p. 190. {{ISBN|978-0-8020-8941-0}}.</ref> In the case of Hinduism, pantheistic views exist alongside panentheistic, polytheistic, monotheistic, and atheistic ones.{{sfn|Fowler|1997|p=2}}{{sfn|Fowler|2002|p=15-32}}{{sfn|Long|2011|p=128}}

===Spirituality and new religious movements===
Pantheism is popular in modern spirituality and ]s, such as ] and ].<ref>Carpenter, Dennis D. (1996). "Emergent Nature Spirituality: An Examination of the Major Spiritual Contours of the Contemporary Pagan Worldview". In Lewis, James R., ''Magical Religion and Modern Witchcraft''. Albany: State University of New York Press. {{ISBN|978-0-7914-2890-0}}. p. 50.</ref> Two organizations that specify the word pantheism in their title formed in the last quarter of the 20th century. The Universal Pantheist Society, open to all varieties of pantheists and supportive of environmental causes, was founded in 1975.<ref>{{cite web|title=Home page|url=http://www.pantheist.net/|publisher=Universal Pantheist Society|access-date=8 August 2012}}</ref> The ] is headed by ], an environmentalist, writer and a former vice president of the Universal Pantheist Society, from which he resigned in 1996. The World Pantheist Movement was incorporated in 1999 to focus exclusively on promoting ] – a strict ] version of pantheism,<ref>{{cite web|last=World Pantheist Movement|title=Naturalism and Religion: can there be a naturalistic & scientific spirituality?|url=http://www.pantheism.net/natural.htm|access-date=4 September 2012}}</ref> considered by some a form of ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Stone|first=Jerome Arthur|title=Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative|url=https://archive.org/details/religiousnatural00ston|url-access=limited|year=2008|publisher=State University of New York Press|location=Albany|isbn=978-0791475379|pages=}}</ref> It has been described as an example of "dark green religion" with a focus on ].<ref name="Dark Green">Bron Raymond Taylor, "]", University of California Press, 2010, pp. 159–160.</ref>

{{See also|Dark green environmentalism}}


==See also== ==See also==
*] * ]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
* ]
* ], a term that is philosophically distinct but derived from the same root words
* ]

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist|30em}}

==Sources==
{{refbegin}}
* {{Citation | last =Bowker | first =John | year =2000a | title =The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions | chapter =Advaita Vedanta | publisher =Oxford University Press | isbn =978-0-19-280094-7 | chapter-url =https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/advaita-vedanta | access-date =1 August 2020 | archive-date =5 January 2022 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20220105073914/https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/advaita-vedanta | url-status =live }}
* {{Citation | last =Deutsch | first =Eliot | year =1973 |title=Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction| publisher=University of Hawaii Press|isbn=978-0-8248-0271-4 | url =https://books.google.com/books?id=63gdKwhHeV0C}}
* {{Citation | last =Deutsch | first =Eliot | year =1988 | title =Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction | publisher =University of Hawaii Press | isbn =0-88706-662-3 | url =https://archive.org/details/experienceofhind00zell}}
* {{Citation | last =Fowler | first =Jeaneane D. | year =1997 | title =Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices | publisher =Sussex Academic Press}}
* {{Citation | last =Fowler | first =Jeaneane D. | year =2002 | title =Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism | publisher =Sussex Academic Press}}
* {{Citation | last =Hacker | first =Paul | year =1995 | title =Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedanta | publisher =SUNY Press | isbn =978-0-7914-2582-4}}
* {{Citation|last=Indich|first=William|year=2000|title=Consciousness in Advaita Vedanta|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7ykZjWOiBMoC|isbn=978-8120812512}}
* {{Citation|last=King|first=Richard|year=1995|title=Early Advaita Vedānta and Buddhism: The Mahāyāna Context of the Gauḍapādīya-kārikā|publisher=SUNY Press}}
* {{Citation|last1=Koller|first1=John M.|year=2013|chapter=Shankara|editor1-last=Meister|editor1-first=Chad |editor2-last=Copan|editor2-first=Paul|title=Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion|publisher=Routledge}}
* {{citation |last=Levine |first=Michael |title=Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity |publisher=Psychology Press |date=1994 |isbn=9780415070645 }}
* {{Citation | last =Long | first =Jeffrey D. | year =2011 | title =Historical Dictionary of Hinduism | publisher =Scarecrow Press}}
* {{Citation | last =Malkovsky | first =Bradley J. | year =2000 | chapter =Samkara on Divine Grace | editor-last =Malkovsky | editor-first =Bradley J. | title =New Perspectives on Advaita Vedānta: Essays in Commemoration of Professor Richard De Smet, S.J. | publisher =BRILL}}
* {{Citation | last =Mayeda | first =Sengaku | year =1992 | chapter =An Introduction to the Life and Thought of Sankara | editor-first =Sengaku | editor-last =Mayeda | title =A Thousand Teachings: The Upadeśasāhasrī of Śaṅkara | publisher =State University of New York City Press | isbn =0-7914-0944-9 | chapter-url =https://archive.org/details/thousandteaching00sank }}
* {{Citation | last =Menon | first =Sangeetha | year =2012 | title =Advaita Vedanta | publisher =Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | url =https://iep.utm.edu/adv-veda/}}
* {{Citation|last=Milne|first=Joseph|title=Advaita Vedanta and typologies of multiplicity and unity: An interpretation of nindual knowledge|journal=International Journal of Hindu Studies|volume=1|issue=1|date=April 1997|pages=165–188|doi=10.1007/s11407-997-0017-6|s2cid=143690641}}
* {{Citation | last =Mohanty | first =JN | year =1980 | title =Understanding some Ontological Differences in Indian Philosophy | journal =Journal of Indian Philosophy |volume=8 |issue=3| pages =205–217 | doi =10.1007/BF00166295 | s2cid =145752220 }}
* {{Citation | last =Sivananda | first =Swami | year =1993 | title =All About Hinduism | publisher =The Divine Life Society}}
* {{Citation | last =Urmson | first =James Opie | year =1991 | title =The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy and Philosophers | publisher =Routledge}}
* {{Citation | editor-last =Brugger | editor-first =Walter | year =1972 | title =Diccionario de Filosofía | place =Barcelona | at=art. '''dualismo''', '''monismo''', '''pluralismo'''|publisher =Herder}}
* {{Citation | last =Mandik | first =Pete | year =2010 | title =Key Terms in Philosophy of Mind | publisher =Continuum International Publish.}}
{{refend}}

==Further reading==
* Amryc, C. ''Pantheism: The Light and Hope of Modern Reason'', 1898.
* Harrison, Paul, ''Elements of Pantheism'', Element Press, 1999.
* Hunt, John, ''Pantheism and Christianity'', William Isbister Limited, 1884.
* Levine, Michael, ''Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity'', Psychology Press, 1994, {{ISBN|9780415070645}}
* Picton, James Allanson, ''Pantheism: Its story and significance'', Archibald Constable & Co., 1905. .
* ]., ''General Sketch of the History of Pantheism'', Cambridge University Press, 2011 (reprint, originally published 1879), {{ISBN|9781108028028}}
* Russell, Sharman Apt, ''Standing in the Light: My Life as a Pantheist'', Basic Books, 2008, {{ISBN|0465005179}}
* ] ''Pantheism and the Value of Life'', 1919.


==External links== ==External links==
{{wikiquote}}
{{Wiktionary}} {{Wiktionary}}
{{Wikiquote}}
*, pantheism.net
{{Commons category}}
*, plato.stanford.edu
*Bollacher, Martin 2020: pantheism. In: Kirchhoff, T. (Hg.): . Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
*{{dmoz|Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Pantheism/|Pantheism}}
* entry by Michael Levine (earlier article on pantheism in the ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'')
*, pantheist-index.net
*{{cite SEP |url-id=pantheism |title=Pantheism |last=Mander |first=William}}
*, wku.edu
*, pantheist-index.net
*{{CathEncy|wstitle=Pantheism}}
*
*, pantheism.net
*{{Cite CE1913|wstitle=Pantheism}}
*
*
*
*
* On Whitehead's process pantheism: ], ''''. Foreword by ], Frankfurt / Paris, Ontos Verlag, 2006.


{{Theism}}
{{Religion topics}} {{Religion topics}}
{{Paganism}}
{{philosophy of religion}}
{{Philosophy of religion}}
{{Theology}} {{Theology}}
{{Philosophy topics}} {{Philosophy topics}}
{{Romanticism}}
{{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 03:16, 8 November 2024

Belief that God and reality are identical Not to be confused with Pandeism, Panentheism, or Panpsychism.

Part of a series on
Theism
Types of faith
Specific conceptions
In particular religions
Abrahamic
Indo-Iranian
Chinese
Attributes
  • Experiences
  • Practices
Related topics

Pantheism is the philosophical and religious belief that reality, the universe, and nature are identical to divinity or a supreme entity. The physical universe is thus understood as an immanent deity, still expanding and creating, which has existed since the beginning of time. The term pantheist designates one who holds both that everything constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine, consisting of an all-encompassing, manifested god or goddess. All astronomical objects are thence viewed as parts of a sole deity.

Another definition of pantheism is the worship of all gods of every religion. But this is more precisely termed omnism. Pantheist belief does not recognize a distinct personal god, anthropomorphic or otherwise, but instead characterizes a broad range of doctrines differing in forms of relationships between reality and divinity. Pantheistic concepts date back thousands of years, and pantheistic elements have been identified in various religious traditions. The term pantheism was coined by mathematician Joseph Raphson in 1697 and since then, it has been used to describe the beliefs of a variety of people and organizations.

Pantheism was popularized in Western culture as a theology and philosophy based on the work of the 17th-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza, in particular, his book Ethics. A pantheistic stance was also taken in the 16th century by philosopher and cosmologist Giordano Bruno.

In the East, Advaita Vedanta, a school of Hindu philosophy is thought to be similar to pantheism in Western philosophy. The early Taoism of Laozi and Zhuangzi is also sometimes considered pantheistic, although it could be more similar to panentheism. Cheondoism, which arose in the Joseon Dynasty of Korea, and Won Buddhism are also considered pantheistic.

Etymology

Pantheism derives from the Greek word πᾶν pan (meaning "all, of everything") and θεός theos (meaning "god, divine"). The first known combination of these roots appears in Latin, in Joseph Raphson's 1697 book De Spatio Reali seu Ente Infinito, where he refers to "pantheismus". It was subsequently translated into English as "pantheism" in 1702.

Definitions

Part of a series on
Spirituality
Outline
Religion
Traditional
Modern
Spiritual experience
Spiritual development
Influences
WesternGeneral

Antiquity

Medieval

Early modern

Modern

Orientalist
AsianPre-historic

Iran

India

East-Asia

Other non-Western
Psychological
Research
Neurological
Part of a series on
Nontheistic religion
Concepts
Religious stances
Pantheists believe that the universe itself and everything in it forms a single, all-encompassing deity.

There are numerous definitions of pantheism, including:

  • a theological and philosophical position which identifies God with the universe, or regards the universe as a manifestation of God;
  • the belief that everything is part of an all-encompassing, immanent God, and that all forms of reality may then be considered either modes of that Being, or identical with it; and
  • a non-religious philosophical position maintaining that the Universe (in the sense of the totality of all existence) and God are identical.

History

Pre-modern times

Early traces of pantheist thought can be found within animistic beliefs and tribal religions throughout the world as an expression of unity with the divine, specifically in beliefs that have no central polytheist or monotheist personas. Hellenistic theology makes early recorded reference to pantheism within the ancient Greek religion of Orphism, where pan (the all) is made cognate with the creator God Phanes (symbolizing the universe), and with Zeus, after the swallowing of Phanes.

Pantheistic tendencies existed in a number of Gnostic groups, with pantheistic thought appearing throughout the Middle Ages. These included the beliefs of mystics such as Ortlieb of Strasbourg, David of Dinant, Amalric of Bena, and Eckhart.

The Catholic Church has long regarded pantheistic ideas as heresy. Sebastian Franck was considered an early Pantheist. Giordano Bruno, an Italian friar who evangelized about a transcendent and infinite God, was burned at the stake in 1600 by the Roman Inquisition. He has since become known as a celebrated pantheist and martyr of science.

The Hindu philosophy of Advaita Vedanta is thought to be similar to pantheism. The term Advaita (literally "non-secondness", but usually rendered as "nondualism", and often equated with monism) refers to the idea that Brahman alone is ultimately real, while the transient phenomenal world is an illusory appearance (maya) of Brahman. In this view, jivatman, the experiencing self, is ultimately non-different ("na aparah") from Ātman-Brahman, the highest Self or Reality. The jivatman or individual self is a mere reflection or limitation of singular Ātman in a multitude of apparent individual bodies.

Baruch Spinoza

The philosophy of Baruch Spinoza is often regarded as pantheism.

In the West, pantheism was formalized as a separate theology and philosophy based on the work of the 17th-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza. Spinoza was a Dutch philosopher of Portuguese descent raised in the Sephardi Jewish community in Amsterdam. He developed highly controversial ideas regarding the authenticity of the Hebrew Bible and the nature of the Divine, and was effectively excluded from Jewish society at age 23, when the local synagogue issued a herem against him. A number of his books were published posthumously, and shortly thereafter included in the Catholic Church's Index of Forbidden Books.

In the posthumous Ethics, he opposed René Descartes' famous mind–body dualism, the theory that the body and spirit are separate. Spinoza held the monist view that the two are the same, and monism is a fundamental part of his philosophy. He was described as a "God-intoxicated man," and used the word God to describe the unity of all substance. This view influenced philosophers such as Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who said, "You are either a Spinozist or not a philosopher at all." Spinoza earned praise as one of the great rationalists of 17th-century philosophy and one of Western philosophy's most important thinkers. Although the term "pantheism" was not coined until after his death, he is regarded as the most celebrated advocate of the concept. Ethics was the major source from which Western pantheism spread.

18th century

The first known use of the term "pantheism" was in Latin ("pantheismus") by the English mathematician Joseph Raphson in his work De Spatio Reali seu Ente Infinito, published in 1697. Raphson begins with a distinction between atheistic "panhylists" (from the Greek roots pan, "all", and hyle, "matter"), who believe everything is matter, and Spinozan "pantheists" who believe in "a certain universal substance, material as well as intelligence, that fashions all things that exist out of its own essence." Raphson thought that the universe was immeasurable in respect to a human's capacity of understanding, and believed that humans would never be able to comprehend it. He referred to the pantheism of the Ancient Egyptians, Persians, Syrians, Assyrians, Greek, Indians, and Jewish Kabbalists, specifically referring to Spinoza.

The term was first used in English by a translation of Raphson's work in 1702. It was later used and popularized by Irish writer John Toland in his work of 1705 Socinianism Truly Stated, by a Pantheist. Toland was influenced by both Spinoza and Bruno, and had read Joseph Raphson's De Spatio Reali, referring to it as "the ingenious Mr. Ralphson's (sic) Book of Real Space". Like Raphson, he used the terms "pantheist" and "Spinozist" interchangeably. In 1720 he wrote the Pantheisticon: or The Form of Celebrating the Socratic-Society in Latin, envisioning a pantheist society that believed, "All things in the world are one, and one is all in all things ... what is all in all things is God, eternal and immense, neither born nor ever to perish." He clarified his idea of pantheism in a letter to Gottfried Leibniz in 1710 when he referred to "the pantheistic opinion of those who believe in no other eternal being but the universe".

In the mid-eighteenth century, the English theologian Daniel Waterland defined pantheism this way: "It supposes God and nature, or God and the whole universe, to be one and the same substance—one universal being; insomuch that men's souls are only modifications of the divine substance." In the early nineteenth century, the German theologian Julius Wegscheider defined pantheism as the belief that God and the world established by God are one and the same.

Between 1785–89, a controversy about Spinoza's philosophy arose between the German philosophers Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (a critic) and Moses Mendelssohn (a defender). Known in German as the Pantheismusstreit (pantheism controversy), it helped spread pantheism to many German thinkers.

19th century

Growing influence

During the beginning of the 19th century, pantheism was the viewpoint of many leading writers and philosophers, attracting figures such as William Wordsworth and Samuel Coleridge in Britain; Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Schelling and Hegel in Germany; Knut Hamsun in Norway; and Walt Whitman, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau in the United States. Seen as a growing threat by the Vatican, in 1864 it was formally condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors.

A letter written in 1886 by William Herndon, Abraham Lincoln's law partner, was sold at auction for US$30,000 in 2011. In it, Herndon writes of the U.S. President's evolving religious views, which included pantheism.

"Mr. Lincoln's religion is too well known to me to allow of even a shadow of a doubt; he is or was a Theist and a Rationalist, denying all extraordinary – supernatural inspiration or revelation. At one time in his life, to say the least, he was an elevated Pantheist, doubting the immortality of the soul as the Christian world understands that term. He believed that the soul lost its identity and was immortal as a force. Subsequent to this he rose to the belief of a God, and this is all the change he ever underwent."

The subject is understandably controversial, but the content of the letter is consistent with Lincoln's fairly lukewarm approach to organized religion.

Comparison with non-Christian religions

Some 19th-century theologians thought that various pre-Christian religions and philosophies were pantheistic. They thought Pantheism was similar to the ancient Hinduism philosophy of Advaita (non-dualism).

19th-century European theologians also considered Ancient Egyptian religion to contain pantheistic elements and pointed to Egyptian philosophy as a source of Greek Pantheism. The latter included some of the Presocratics, such as Heraclitus and Anaximander. The Stoics were pantheists, beginning with Zeno of Citium and culminating in the emperor-philosopher Marcus Aurelius. During the pre-Christian Roman Empire, Stoicism was one of the three dominant schools of philosophy, along with Epicureanism and Neoplatonism. The early Taoism of Laozi and Zhuangzi is also sometimes considered pantheistic, although it could be more similar to panentheism.

Cheondoism, which arose in the Joseon Dynasty of Korea, and Won Buddhism are also considered pantheistic. The Realist Society of Canada believes that the consciousness of the self-aware universe is reality, which is an alternative view of Pantheism.

20th century

In the late 20th century, some declared that pantheism was an underlying theology of Neopaganism, and pantheists began forming organizations devoted specifically to pantheism and treating it as a separate religion.

Levi Ponce's Luminaries of Pantheism mural in Venice, California, for The Paradise Project

21st century

Albert Einstein is considered a pantheist by some commentators.

Dorion Sagan, son of scientist and science communicator Carl Sagan, published the 2007 book Dazzle Gradually: Reflections on the Nature of Nature, co-written with his mother Lynn Margulis. In the chapter "Truth of My Father", Sagan writes that his "father believed in the God of Spinoza and Einstein, God not behind nature, but as nature, equivalent to it."

In 2009, pantheism was mentioned in a Papal encyclical and in a statement on New Year's Day, 2010, criticizing pantheism for denying the superiority of humans over nature and seeing the source of man's salvation in nature.

In 2015, The Paradise Project, an organization "dedicated to celebrating and spreading awareness about pantheism," commissioned Los Angeles muralist Levi Ponce to paint the 75-foot mural in Venice, California, near the organization's offices. The mural depicts Albert Einstein, Alan Watts, Baruch Spinoza, Terence McKenna, Carl Jung, Carl Sagan, Emily Dickinson, Nikola Tesla, Friedrich Nietzsche, Ralph Waldo Emerson, W.E.B. Du Bois, Henry David Thoreau, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Rumi, Adi Shankara, and Laozi.

Categorizations

There are multiple varieties of pantheism and various systems of classifying them relying upon one or more spectra or in discrete categories.

Degree of determinism

The philosopher Charles Hartshorne used the term Classical Pantheism to describe the deterministic philosophies of Baruch Spinoza, the Stoics, and other like-minded figures. Pantheism (All-is-God) is often associated with monism (All-is-One) and some have suggested that it logically implies determinism (All-is-Now). Albert Einstein explained theological determinism by stating, "the past, present, and future are an 'illusion'". This form of pantheism has been referred to as "extreme monism", in which – in the words of one commentator – "God decides or determines everything, including our supposed decisions." Other examples of determinism-inclined pantheisms include those of Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Hegel.

However, some have argued against treating every meaning of "unity" as an aspect of pantheism, and there exist versions of pantheism that regard determinism as an inaccurate or incomplete view of nature. Examples include the beliefs of John Scotus Eriugena, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling and William James.

Degree of belief

It may also be possible to distinguish two types of pantheism, one being more religious and the other being more philosophical. The Columbia Encyclopedia writes of the distinction:

"If the pantheist starts with the belief that the one great reality, eternal and infinite, is God, he sees everything finite and temporal as but some part of God. There is nothing separate or distinct from God, for God is the universe. If, on the other hand, the conception taken as the foundation of the system is that the great inclusive unity is the world itself, or the universe, God is swallowed up in that unity, which may be designated nature."

Form of monism

A diagram with neutral monism compared to Cartesian dualism, physicalism and idealism

Philosophers and theologians have often suggested that pantheism implies monism.

For the Aztecs teotl was the metaphysical omnipresence creating the cosmos and all its contents from within itself as well as out of itself. This is conceptualized in a kind of monistic pantheism as manifest in the supreme god Ometeotl, as well as a large pantheon of lesser gods and idealizations of natural phenomena.

Other

In 1896, J. H. Worman, a theologian, identified seven categories of pantheism: Mechanical or materialistic (God the mechanical unity of existence); Ontological (fundamental unity, Spinoza); Dynamic; Psychical (God is the soul of the world); Ethical (God is the universal moral order, Fichte); Logical (Hegel); and Pure (absorption of God into nature, which Worman equates with atheism).

In 1984, Paul D. Feinberg, professor of biblical and systematic theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, also identified seven: Hylozoistic; Immanentistic; Absolutistic monistic; Relativistic monistic; Acosmic; Identity of opposites; and Neoplatonic or emanationistic.

Demographics

Prevalence

According to censuses of 2011, the UK was the country with the most Pantheists. As of 2011, about 1,000 Canadians identified their religion as "Pantheist", representing 0.003% of the population. By 2021, the number of Canadian pantheists had risen to 1,855 (0.005%). In Ireland, Pantheism rose from 202 in 1991, to 1106 in 2002, to 1,691 in 2006, 1,940 in 2011. In New Zealand, there was exactly one pantheist man in 1901. By 1906, the number of pantheists in New Zealand had septupled to 7 (6 male, 1 female). This number had further risen to 366 by 2006.

Country Subdivision(s) Number Year Ref
 Australia 1,394 (0.006%) 2011
 Canada 1,855 (0.005%) 2021
 Canada  Quebec 75 (0.001%) 2011
 Canada  Ontario 295 (0.002%) 2011
 Canada  Nova Scotia 30 (0.003%) 2011
 Canada  New Brunswick 45 (0.006%) 2011
 Canada  Manitoba 40 (0.003%) 2011
 Canada  British Columbia 395 (0.008%) 2011
 Canada  Prince Edward Island 0 (0%) 2011
 Canada  Saskatchewan 25 (0.002%) 2011
 Canada  Alberta 125 (0.004%) 2011
 Canada  Newfoundland and Labrador 0 (0%) 2011
 Canada  Northwest Territories 0 (0%) 2011
 Canada  Yukon 0 (0%) 2011
 Canada  Nunavut 0 (0%) 2011
 Ireland 1,940 (0.04%) 2011
 Ireland Border Region 179 (0.04%) 2006
 Ireland Dublin 524 2006
 Ireland Mid-East Region 177 2006
 Ireland Midland Region 118 2006
 Ireland South-East Region 173 2006
 Ireland South-West Region 270 2006
 Ireland West Region 181 2006
 New Zealand 366 (0.009%) 2006
 United Kingdom  Scotland 60 (0.001%) 2001
 United Kingdom  England and  Wales 2,216 (0.004%) 2011
 United Kingdom Northern Ireland 29 (0.002%) 2011
 Uruguay 790 (0.02%) 2006

Age, ethnicity, and gender

The 2021 Canadian census showed that pantheists were somewhat more likely to be in their 20s and 30s compared to the general population. People under 15 were about four times less likely to be pantheist than the general population.

The 2021 Canadian census also showed that pantheists were less likely to be part of a recognized minority group compared to the general population, with 90.3% of pantheists not being part of any minority group (compared to 73.5% of the general population). The census did not register any pantheists who were Arab, Southeast Asian, West Asian, Korean, or Japanese.

In Canada (2011), there was no gender difference in regards to pantheism. However, in Ireland (2011), pantheists were slightly more likely to be female (1074 pantheists, 0.046% of women) than male (866 pantheists, 0.038% of men). In contrast, Canada (2021) showed pantheists to be slightly more likely to be male, with men representing 51.5% of pantheists.

Comparison of pantheists in Canada against the general population (2021)
General population Pantheists
Total population 36,328,480 1,855
Gender Male 17,937,165 (49.4%) 955 (51.5%)
Female 18,391,315 (50.6%) 895 (48.2%)
Age 0 to 14 5,992,555 (16.5%) 75 (4%)
15 to 19 2,003,200 (5.5%) 40 (2%)
20 to 24 2,177,860 (6%) 125 (6.7%)
25 to 34 4,898,625 (13.5%) 405 (21.8%)
35 to 44 4,872,425 (13.4%) 380 (20.5%)
45 to 54 4,634,850 (12.8%) 245 (13.2%)
55 to 64 5,162,365 (14.2%) 245 13.2%)
65 and over 6,586,600 (18.1%) 325 (17.5%)
Ethnicity Non-minority 26,689,275 (73.5%) 1,675 (90.3%)
South Asian 2,571,400 (7%) 20 (1.1%)
Chinese 1,715,770 (4.7%) 45 (2.4%)
Black 1,547,870 (4.3%) 45 (2.4%)
Filipino 957,355 (2.6%) 10 (0.5%)
Arab 694,015 (1.9%) 0 (0%)
Latin American 580,235 (1.6%) 25 (1.3%)
Southeast Asian 390,340 (1.1%) 0 (0%)
West Asian 360,495 (1%) 0 (0%)
Korean 218,140 (0.6%) 0 (0%)
Japanese 98,890 (0.3%) 0 (0%)
Visible minority, n.i.e. 172,885 (0.5%) 0 (0%)
Multiple visible minorities 331,805 (0.9%) 15 (0.8%)
Canadian pantheist population by percentage (2011 National Household Survey)

Related concepts

Nature worship or nature mysticism is often conflated and confused with pantheism. It is pointed out by at least one expert, Harold Wood, founder of the Universal Pantheist Society, that in pantheist philosophy Spinoza's identification of God with nature is very different from a recent idea of a self identifying pantheist with environmental ethical concerns. His use of the word nature to describe his worldview may be vastly different from the "nature" of modern sciences. He and other nature mystics who also identify as pantheists use "nature" to refer to the limited natural environment (as opposed to man-made built environment). This use of "nature" is different from the broader use from Spinoza and other pantheists describing natural laws and the overall phenomena of the physical world. Nature mysticism may be compatible with pantheism but it may also be compatible with theism and other views. Pantheism has also been involved in animal worship especially in primal religions.

Nontheism is an umbrella term which has been used to refer to a variety of religions not fitting traditional theism, and under which pantheism has been included.

Panentheism (from Greek πᾶν (pân) "all"; ἐν (en) "in"; and θεός (theós) "God"; "all-in-God") was formally coined in Germany in the 19th century in an attempt to offer a philosophical synthesis between traditional theism and pantheism, stating that God is substantially omnipresent in the physical universe but also exists "apart from" or "beyond" it as its Creator and Sustainer. Thus panentheism separates itself from pantheism, positing the extra claim that God exists above and beyond the world as we know it. The line between pantheism and panentheism can be blurred depending on varying definitions of God, so there have been disagreements when assigning particular notable figures to pantheism or panentheism.

Pandeism is another word derived from pantheism, and is characterized as a combination of reconcilable elements of pantheism and deism. It assumes a Creator-deity that is at some point distinct from the universe and then transforms into it, resulting in a universe similar to the pantheistic one in present essence, but differing in origin.

Panpsychism is the philosophical view that consciousness, mind, or soul is a universal feature of all things. Some pantheists also subscribe to the distinct philosophical views hylozoism (or panvitalism), the view that everything is alive, and its close neighbor animism, the view that everything has a soul or spirit.

Pantheism in religion

Traditional religions

Many traditional and folk religions including African traditional religions and Native American religions can be seen as pantheistic, or a mixture of pantheism and other doctrines such as polytheism and animism. According to pantheists, there are elements of pantheism in some forms of Christianity.

Ideas resembling pantheism existed in Eastern religions before the 18th century (notably Hinduism, Confucianism, and Taoism). Although there is no evidence that these influenced Spinoza's work, there is such evidence regarding other contemporary philosophers, such as Leibniz, and later Voltaire. In the case of Hinduism, pantheistic views exist alongside panentheistic, polytheistic, monotheistic, and atheistic ones.

Spirituality and new religious movements

Pantheism is popular in modern spirituality and new religious movements, such as Neopaganism and Theosophy. Two organizations that specify the word pantheism in their title formed in the last quarter of the 20th century. The Universal Pantheist Society, open to all varieties of pantheists and supportive of environmental causes, was founded in 1975. The World Pantheist Movement is headed by Paul Harrison, an environmentalist, writer and a former vice president of the Universal Pantheist Society, from which he resigned in 1996. The World Pantheist Movement was incorporated in 1999 to focus exclusively on promoting naturalistic pantheism – a strict metaphysical naturalistic version of pantheism, considered by some a form of religious naturalism. It has been described as an example of "dark green religion" with a focus on environmental ethics.

See also: Dark green environmentalism

See also

Notes

  1. Form of monism:
    • Malkovsky 2000, p. 71: "The interpretation of advaita that is the most common equates non-duality with monism and acosmic illusionism. Only the Absolute, or the paraa brahma, is said to exist; everything else is but an illusory appearance."
    • Menon 2012: "The essential philosophy of Advaita is an idealist monism, and is considered to be presented first in the Upaniṣads and consolidated in the Brahma Sūtra by this tradition."
    • King 1995, p. 65: "The prevailing monism of the Upanishads was developed by the Advaita Vedanta to its ultimate extreme."
    • Mohanty 1980, p. 205: "Nyaya-Vaiseshika is realistic; Advaita Vedanta is idealistic. The former is pluralistic, the latter monistic."
  2. Highest self:
    • Shankara, Upadesasahasri I.18.3: "I am ever-free, the existent" (Sat). I.18.6: "The two notions "I am the Existent-Brahman" and "I act," have Atman as their witness. It is considered more reasonable to give up only of the two which arises from ignorance. I.18.7: "The notion, "I am the Existent," arises from right means of knowledge the other notion has its origin in fallacious means of knowledge." (Mayeda 1992, p. 172)
    • Brahmajnanavalimala Verse 20: "Brahman is real, the universe is mithya (it cannot be categorized as either real or unreal). The jiva is Brahman itself and not different." Translation by S. N. Sastri
    • Sivananda 1993, p. 219: "Brahman (the Absolute) is alone real; this world is unreal; and the Jiva or individual soul is non-different from Brahman."
    • Menon 2012: "The experiencing self (jīva) and the transcendental self of the Universe (ātman) are in reality identical (both are Brahman), though the individual self seems different as space within a container seems different from space as such. These cardinal doctrines are represented in the anonymous verse "brahma satyam jagan mithya; jīvo brahmaiva na aparah" (Brahman is alone True, and this world of plurality is an error; the individual self is not different from Brahman)."
    • Deutsch 1973, p. 54: " essential status is that of unqualified reality, of identity with the Absolute the self (jiva) is only misperceived: the self is really Brahman."
    • Koller 2013, pp. 100–101: "Atman, which is identical to Brahman, is ultimately the only reality and the appearance of plurality is entirely the work of ignorance the self is ultimately of the nature of Atman/Brahman Brahman alone is ultimately real."
    • Bowker 2000a, "Advaita Vedanta": "There is only Brahman, which is necessarily undifferentiated. It follows that there cannot even be a difference, or duality, between the human subject, or self, and Brahman, for Brahman must be that very self (since Brahman is the reality underlying all appearance). The goal of human life and wisdom must, therefore, be the realization that the self (ātman) is Brahman."
    • Hacker (1995, p. 88) notes that Shankara uses two groups of words to denote 'atman': "One group - principally jiva, vijnanatman, and sarira - expresses the illusory aspect of the soul But in addition there are the two expressions atman and pratyagatman. These also designate the individual soul, but in its real aspect." Mayeda (1992, pp. 11, 14) uses the word pratyagatman; Sivananda1993, p. 219), Deutsch (1973, p. 54), and Menon (2012) use the term jiva when referring to the identity of atman and Brahman.
  3. Different types of monism include:
    1. Substance monism, "the view that the apparent plurality of substances is due to different states or appearances of a single substance".
    2. Attributive monism, "the view that whatever the number of substances, they are of a single ultimate kind".
    3. Partial monism, "within a given realm of being (however many there may be) there is only one substance".
    4. Existence monism, the view that there is only one concrete object token (The One, "Τὸ Ἕν" or the Monad).
    5. Priority monism, "the whole is prior to its parts" or "the world has parts, but the parts are dependent fragments of an integrated whole."
    6. Property monism: the view that all properties are of a single type (e.g. only physical properties exist).
    7. Genus monism: "the doctrine that there is a highest category; e.g., being".
    Views contrasting with monism are:
    • Metaphysical dualism, which asserts that there are two ultimately irreconcilable substances or realities such as Good and Evil, for example, Manichaeism.
    • Metaphysical pluralism, which asserts three or more fundamental substances or realities.
    • Nihilism, negates any of the above categories (substances, properties, concrete objects, etc.).
    Monism in modern philosophy of mind can be divided into three broad categories:
    1. Idealism, phenomenalism, or mentalistic monism, which holds that only mind or spirit is real.
    2. Neutral monism, which holds that one sort of thing fundamentally exists, to which both the mental and the physical can be reduced.
    3. Material monism (also called Physicalism and Materialism), which holds that only the physical is real, and that the mental or spiritual can be reduced to the physical:
    a. Eliminative materialism, according to which everything is physical and mental things do not exist.
    b. Reductive physicalism, according to which mental things do exist and are a kind of physical thing, Such as Behaviourism, Type-identity theory and Functionalism.
    Certain positions do not fit easily into the above categories, such as functionalism, anomalous monism, and reflexive monism. Moreover, they do not define the meaning of "real".

References

  1. "Pantheism – Definition, Meaning & Synonyms". Vocabulary.com. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  2. The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1998. p. 1341. ISBN 978-0-19-861263-6.
  3. Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan and Free Press. 1967. p. 34.
  4. Reid-Bowen, Paul (2016). Goddess as Nature: Towards a Philosophical Thealogy. Taylor & Francis. p. 70. ISBN 978-1317126348.
  5. "Definition of Pantheism". 28 September 2023.
  6. Charles Taliaferro; Paul Draper; Philip L. Quinn (eds.). A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. p. 340. They deny that God is 'totally other' than the world or ontologically distinct from it.
  7. ^ Levine 1994, pp. 44, 274–275:
    • "The idea that Unity that is rooted in nature is what types of nature mysticism (e.g. Wordsworth, Robinson Jeffers, Gary Snyder) have in common with more philosophically robust versions of pantheism. It is why nature mysticism and philosophical pantheism are often conflated and confused for one another."
    • " pantheism is distant from Spinoza's identification of God with nature, and much closer to nature mysticism. In fact it is nature mysticism."
    • "Nature mysticism, however, is as compatible with theism as it is with pantheism."
  8. ^ Taylor, Bron (2008). Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. A&C Black. pp. 1341–1342. ISBN 978-1441122780. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
  9. ^ Ann Thomson; Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment, 2008, page 54.
  10. ^ Lloyd, Genevieve (1996). Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Spinoza and The Ethics. Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks. Routledge. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-415-10782-2.
  11. Birx, Jams H. (11 November 1997). "Giordano Bruno". Mobile, AL: The Harbinger. Archived from the original on 27 July 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Bruno was burned to death at the stake for his pantheistic stance and cosmic perspective.
  12. Pearsall, Judy (1998). The New Oxford Dictionary Of English (1st ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 1341. ISBN 978-0-19-861263-6.
  13. Edwards, Paul (1967). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan. p. 34.
  14. ^ Picton, James Allanson (1905). Pantheism: its story and significance. Chicago: Archibald Constable & Co. LTD. ISBN 978-1419140082.
  15. Owen, H. P. Concepts of Deity. London: Macmillan, 1971, p. 65.
  16. The New Oxford Dictionary Of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1998. p. 1341. ISBN 978-0-19-861263-6.
  17. Damascius, referring to the theology delivered by Hieronymus and Hellanicus in "The Theogonies". sacred-texts.com.:"... the theology now under discussion celebrates as Protogonus (First-born) , and calls him Dis, as the disposer of all things, and the whole world: upon that account he is also denominated Pan."
  18. Betegh, Gábor, The Derveni Papyrus, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 176–178 ISBN 978-0-521-80108-9
  19. ^ Worman, J. H., "Pantheism", in Cyclopædia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, Volume 1, John McClintock, James Strong (Eds), Harper & Brothers, 1896, pp. 616–624.
  20. Collinge, William, Historical Dictionary of Catholicism, Scarecrow Press, 2012, p 188, ISBN 9780810879799.
  21. "What is pantheism?". catholic.com. Archived from the original on 1 August 2017.
  22. Kołakowski, Leszek (11 June 2009). The Two Eyes of Spinoza & Other Essays on Philosophers – Leszek Kołakowski – Google Books. St. Augustine's Press. ISBN 9781587318757. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
  23. McIntyre, James Lewis, Giordano Bruno, Macmillan, 1903, p 316.
  24. "Bruno Was a Martyr for Magic, Not Science | Science 2.0". 27 August 2014.
  25. Deutsch 1988, p. 3.
  26. Milne 1997.
  27. Menon 2012.
  28. Deutsch 1973, p. 3, note 2; p.54.
  29. Koller 2013, p. 100-101.
  30. Indich 2000, p. 50.
  31. *Fraser, Alexander Campbell "Philosophy of Theism", William Blackwood and Sons, 1895, p 163.
  32. Gottlieb, Anthony (18 July 1999). "God Exists, Philosophically (review of "Spinoza: A Life" by Steven Nadler)". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 September 2009.
  33. "Why Spinoza Was Excommunicated". National Endowment for the Humanities. 1 September 2015. Archived from the original on 8 September 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  34. "Destroyer and Builder". The New Republic. 3 May 2012. Retrieved 7 March 2013.
  35. ^ Plumptre, Constance (1879). General sketch of the history of pantheism, Volume 2. London: Samuel Deacon and Co. pp. 3–5, 8, 29. ISBN 9780766155022.
  36. Hegel's History of Philosophy. SUNY Press. 2003. ISBN 9780791455432. Archived from the original on 13 May 2011. Retrieved 2 May 2011.
  37. Scruton 1986 (2002 ed.), ch. 2, p.26
  38. Deleuze, Gilles (1990). "(translator's preface)". Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. Zone Books. Referred to as "the prince" of the philosophers.
  39. Shoham, Schlomo Giora (2010). To Test the Limits of Our Endurance. Cambridge Scholars. p. 111. ISBN 978-1443820684.
  40. Raphson, Joseph (1697). De spatio reali (in Latin). Londini. p. 2.
  41. Suttle, Gary. "Joseph Raphson: 1648–1715". Pantheist Association for Nature. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023. Retrieved 7 September 2012.
  42. Koyré, Alexander (1957). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press. pp. 190–204. ISBN 978-0801803475.
  43. Bennet, T (1702). The History of the Works of the Learned. H.Rhodes. p. 498. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
  44. Dabundo, Laura (2009). Encyclopedia of Romanticism (Routledge Revivals). Routledge. pp. 442–443. ISBN 978-1135232351. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
  45. Daniel, Stephen H. "Toland's Semantic Pantheism," in John Toland's Christianity not Mysterious, Text, Associated Works and Critical Essays. Edited by Philip McGuinness, Alan Harrison, and Richard Kearney. Dublin, Ireland: The Lilliput Press, 1997.
  46. R.E. Sullivan, "John Toland and the Deist controversy: A Study in Adaptations", Harvard University Press, 1982, p. 193.
  47. Harrison, Paul. "Toland: The father of modern pantheism". Pantheist History. World Pantheist Movement. Retrieved 5 September 2012.
  48. Toland, John, Pantheisticon, 1720; reprint of the 1751 edition, New York and London: Garland, 1976, p. 54.
  49. ^ Paul Harrison, Elements of Pantheism, 1999.
  50. Honderich, Ted, The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 641: "First used by John Toland in 1705, the term 'pantheist' designates one who holds both that everything there is constitutes a unity and that this unity is divine."
  51. Thompson, Ann, Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 133, ISBN 9780199236190.
  52. Worman cites Waterland, Works, viii, p. 81.
  53. Worman cites Wegscheider, Institutiones theologicae dogmaticae, p. 250.
  54. Giovanni, di; Livieri, Paolo (6 December 2001). "Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  55. Pope BI. Pius IX (9 June 1862). "Syllabus of Errors 1.1". Papal Encyclicals Online. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
  56. ^ Herndon, William (4 February 1866). "Sold – Herndon's Revelations on Lincoln's Religion" (Excerpt and review). Raab Collection. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  57. ^ Adams, Guy (17 April 2011). "'Pantheist' Lincoln would be unelectable today". The Independent. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on 24 May 2022. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  58. Literary Remains of the Late Professor Theodore Goldstucker, W. H. Allen, 1879. p. 32.
  59. Thilly, Frank (2003) . "Pantheism". In Hastings, James (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Part 18. Kessinger Publishing. p. 614. ISBN 9780766136953.
  60. Armstrong, AH (1967). The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57, 60, 161, 186, 222. ISBN 978052104-0549.
  61. McLynn, Frank (2010). Marcus Aurelius: A Life. Da Capo Press. p. 232. ISBN 9780306819162.
  62. "About Realism". The Realist Society of Canada. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
  63. Adler, Margot (1986). Drawing Down the Moon. Beacon Press.
  64. Sagan, Dorion, "Dazzle Gradually: Reflections on the Nature of Nature" 2007, p. 14.
  65. ^ Caritas In Veritate, 7 July 2009.
  66. "43rd World Day of Peace 2010, If You Want to Cultivate Peace, Protect Creation | BENEDICT XVI". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  67. "New Mural in Vence: "Luminaries of Pantheism"". VenicePaparazzi. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
  68. Rod, Perry. "About the Paradise Project". The Paradise Project. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  69. Wood, Harold (Summer 2017). "New Online Pantheism Community Seeks Common Ground". Pantheist Vision. 34 (2): 5.
  70. Levine, Michael (2020). "Pantheism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  71. Charles Hartshorne and William Reese, ed. (1953). Philosophers Speak of God. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 165–210.
  72. Goldsmith, Donald; Marcia Bartusiak (2006). E = Einstein: His Life, His Thought, and His Influence on Our Culture. New York: Stirling Publishing. p. 187. ISBN 9781402763199.
  73. F.C. Copleston, "Pantheism in Spinoza and the German Idealists," Philosophy 21, 1946, p. 48.
  74. Literary and Philosophical Society of Liverpool, "Proceedings of the Liverpool Literary & Philosophical Society, Volumes 43–44", 1889, p. 285.
  75. John Ferguson, "The Religions of the Roman Empire", Cornell University Press, 1970, p. 193.
  76. Isaacson, Walter (2007). Einstein: His Life and Universe. Simon and Schuster. p. 391. ISBN 9781416539322. I am a determinist.
  77. Lindsay Jones, ed. (2005). Encyclopedia of Religion: Volume 10 (2nd ed.). USA: MacMillan. ISBN 978-0028657332.
  78. Dependence and Freedom: The Moral Thought of Horace Bushnell by David Wayne Haddorff Emerson's belief was "monistic determinism".
    • Creatures of Prometheus: Gender and the Politics of Technology by Timothy Vance Kaufman-Osborn, Prometheus ((Writer)) "Things are in a saddle, and ride mankind."
    • Emerson's position is "soft determinism" (a variant of determinism) .
    • "The 'fate' Emerson identifies is an underlying determinism." (Fate is one of Emerson's essays) .
  79. Hegel was a determinist" (also called a combatibilist a.k.a. soft determinist). "Hegel and Marx are usually cited as the greatest proponents of historical determinism."
  80. Levine, Michael P. (August 1992). "Pantheism, substance and unity". International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 32 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1007/bf01313557. JSTOR 40036697. S2CID 170517621.
  81. Moran, Dermot; Guiu, Adrian (2019), "John Scottus Eriugena", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 19 March 2020
  82. * Theories of the will in the history of philosophy by Archibald Alexander p. 307 Schelling holds "...that the will is not determined but self-determined."
    • The Dynamic Individualism of William James by James O. Pawelski p. 17 " fight against determinism" "My first act of free will shall be to believe in free will."
  83. "Pantheism". The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Columbia University Press. 2012. Retrieved 13 June 2012.
  84. Owen, H. P. (1971). Concepts of Deity. London: Macmillan. p. 67.
  85. ^ Urmson 1991, p. 297.
  86. ^ Schaffer, Jonathan. "Monism: The Priority of the Whole" (PDF). johnathanschaeffer.org. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
  87. Schaffer, Jonathan (19 March 2007). "Monism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 ed.).
  88. ^ Brugger 1972.
  89. ^ Mandik 2010, p. 76.
  90. Maffie, James (2014). Aztec Philosophy: Understanding a World in Motion. University Press of Colorado. ISBN 978-1-60732-222-1.
  91. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, edited by Walter A. Elwell, p. 887.
  92. "Pantheists Around the World".
  93. ^ "2011 National Household Survey: Data tables". Statistics Canada. 8 May 2013. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  94. ^ Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (26 October 2022). "Religion by visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts". www150.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 31 December 2022.
  95. ^ Gilmour, Desmond A. (January 2006). "Changing Religions in the Republic of Ireland, 1991–2002". Irish Geography. 39 (2): 111–128. doi:10.1080/00750770609555871.
  96. ^ "Census 2006: Volume 13 – Religion" (PDF). Dublin, Ireland: Central Statistics Office. 2007. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  97. ^ "Statistical Tables" (PDF). cso.ie. p. 47. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  98. "Results of a Census of the Colony of New Zealand Taken for the Night of the 31st March 1901". Statistics New Zealand. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  99. "Results of a Census of the Colony of New Zealand Taken for the Night of the 29th April, 1906". Statistics New Zealand. 29 April 1906. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  100. ^ 2006 New Zealand census.
  101. 2011 Australia Census
  102. 2001 Scotland Census
  103. "2011 Census: Religion". Census Office for National Statistics. 2011. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  104. "Census 2011: Religion – Full Detail: QS218NI – Northern Ireland". nisra.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 10 November 2013. Retrieved 1 October 2013.
  105. 2006 Uruguay Census
  106. ^ Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (26 October 2022). "Religion by visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts". www150.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 31 December 2022.
  107. McDowell, Michael; Brown, Nathan Robert (2009). World Religions at Your Fingertips – Michael McDowell, Nathan Robert Brown – Google Books. Penguin. ISBN 9781592578467. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
  108. ^ Cooper, John W. (2006). The Other God of the Philosophers. Baker Academic.
  109. Levine 1994, p. 11.
  110. Craig, Edward, ed. (1998). "Genealogy to Iqbal". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. p. 100. ISBN 9780415073103.
  111. Johnston, Sean F. (2009). The History of Science: A Beginner's Guide. p. 90. ISBN 978-1-85168-681-0.
  112. Seager, William; Allen-Hermanson, Sean (23 May 2001). "Panpsychism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 ed.).
  113. Haught, John F. (1990). What Is Religion?: An Introduction. Paulist Press. p. 19.
  114. Parrinder, EG (1970). "Monotheism and Pantheism in Africa". Journal of Religion in Africa. 3 (2): 81–88. doi:10.1163/157006670x00099. JSTOR 1594816.
  115. Levine 1994, p. 67.
  116. Harrison, Paul. "North American Indians: the spirituality of nature". World Pantheist Movement. Retrieved 7 September 2012.
  117. Harrison, Paul. "The origins of Christian pantheism". Pantheist history. World Pantheists Movement. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  118. Fox, Michael W. "Christianity and Pantheism". Universal Pantheist Society. Archived from the original on 9 March 2001. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  119. Zaleha, Bernard. "Recovering Christian Pantheism as the Lost Gospel of Creation". Fund for Christian Ecology, Inc. Archived from the original on 17 July 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  120. Mungello, David E (1971). "Leibniz's Interpretation of Neo-Confucianism". Philosophy East and West. 21 (1): 3–22. doi:10.2307/1397760. JSTOR 1397760.
  121. Lan, Feng (2005). Ezra Pound and Confucianism: remaking humanism in the face of modernity. University of Toronto Press. p. 190. ISBN 978-0-8020-8941-0.
  122. Fowler 1997, p. 2.
  123. Fowler 2002, p. 15-32.
  124. Long 2011, p. 128.
  125. Carpenter, Dennis D. (1996). "Emergent Nature Spirituality: An Examination of the Major Spiritual Contours of the Contemporary Pagan Worldview". In Lewis, James R., Magical Religion and Modern Witchcraft. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-2890-0. p. 50.
  126. "Home page". Universal Pantheist Society. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
  127. World Pantheist Movement. "Naturalism and Religion: can there be a naturalistic & scientific spirituality?". Retrieved 4 September 2012.
  128. Stone, Jerome Arthur (2008). Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative. Albany: State University of New York Press. pp. 10. ISBN 978-0791475379.
  129. Bron Raymond Taylor, "Dark Green Religion: Nature Spirituality and the Planetary Future", University of California Press, 2010, pp. 159–160.

Sources

  • Bowker, John (2000a), "Advaita Vedanta", The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-280094-7, archived from the original on 5 January 2022, retrieved 1 August 2020
  • Deutsch, Eliot (1973), Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-0271-4
  • Deutsch, Eliot (1988), Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 0-88706-662-3
  • Fowler, Jeaneane D. (1997), Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices, Sussex Academic Press
  • Fowler, Jeaneane D. (2002), Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism, Sussex Academic Press
  • Hacker, Paul (1995), Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedanta, SUNY Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2582-4
  • Indich, William (2000), Consciousness in Advaita Vedanta, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120812512
  • King, Richard (1995), Early Advaita Vedānta and Buddhism: The Mahāyāna Context of the Gauḍapādīya-kārikā, SUNY Press
  • Koller, John M. (2013), "Shankara", in Meister, Chad; Copan, Paul (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, Routledge
  • Levine, Michael (1994), Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity, Psychology Press, ISBN 9780415070645
  • Long, Jeffrey D. (2011), Historical Dictionary of Hinduism, Scarecrow Press
  • Malkovsky, Bradley J. (2000), "Samkara on Divine Grace", in Malkovsky, Bradley J. (ed.), New Perspectives on Advaita Vedānta: Essays in Commemoration of Professor Richard De Smet, S.J., BRILL
  • Mayeda, Sengaku (1992), "An Introduction to the Life and Thought of Sankara", in Mayeda, Sengaku (ed.), A Thousand Teachings: The Upadeśasāhasrī of Śaṅkara, State University of New York City Press, ISBN 0-7914-0944-9
  • Menon, Sangeetha (2012), Advaita Vedanta, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Milne, Joseph (April 1997), "Advaita Vedanta and typologies of multiplicity and unity: An interpretation of nindual knowledge", International Journal of Hindu Studies, 1 (1): 165–188, doi:10.1007/s11407-997-0017-6, S2CID 143690641
  • Mohanty, JN (1980), "Understanding some Ontological Differences in Indian Philosophy", Journal of Indian Philosophy, 8 (3): 205–217, doi:10.1007/BF00166295, S2CID 145752220
  • Sivananda, Swami (1993), All About Hinduism, The Divine Life Society
  • Urmson, James Opie (1991), The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy and Philosophers, Routledge
  • Brugger, Walter, ed. (1972), Diccionario de Filosofía, Barcelona: Herder, art. dualismo, monismo, pluralismo
  • Mandik, Pete (2010), Key Terms in Philosophy of Mind, Continuum International Publish.

Further reading

  • Amryc, C. Pantheism: The Light and Hope of Modern Reason, 1898. online
  • Harrison, Paul, Elements of Pantheism, Element Press, 1999. preview
  • Hunt, John, Pantheism and Christianity, William Isbister Limited, 1884. online
  • Levine, Michael, Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity, Psychology Press, 1994, ISBN 9780415070645
  • Picton, James Allanson, Pantheism: Its story and significance, Archibald Constable & Co., 1905. online.
  • Plumptre, Constance E., General Sketch of the History of Pantheism, Cambridge University Press, 2011 (reprint, originally published 1879), ISBN 9781108028028 online
  • Russell, Sharman Apt, Standing in the Light: My Life as a Pantheist, Basic Books, 2008, ISBN 0465005179
  • Urquhart, W. S. Pantheism and the Value of Life, 1919. online

External links

God
Religion portal
Religion
Religious groups and denominations
Western
Abrahamic
Judaism
Christianity
Islam
Other
Iranian
Zoroastrian
Kurdish
Other
Eastern
East Asian
Chinese
Japonic
Korean
Vietnamese
Indian
Hinduism
Buddhism
Other
Ethnic
Altaic
Austroasiatic
Austronesian
Native
American
Tai and Miao
Tibeto-Burmese
Traditional
African
North African
Sub-Saharan
African
Other ethnic
New
religious
movements
Syncretic
Modern
paganism
De novo
Historical religions
Topics
Aspects
Theism
Religious
studies
Religion
and society
Secularism
and irreligion
Overviews
and lists
Religion by country
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
South America
Paganism (and modern paganism)
Historical
ethnic religions (list)
(existing and
extinct)
Asian
European
Middle-Eastern and North African
Oceanian and Pacific Islander
Sub-Saharan African
Modern paganism
(movements)
Ethnic
Other
Myth and ritual
Christianization
Philosophy of religion
Concepts in religion
Conceptions of God
God in
Existence of God
For
Against
Theology
Religious language
Problem of evil
Philosophers
of religion

(by date active)
Ancient and
medieval
Early modern
1800
1850
1880
1900
1920
postwar
1970
1990
2010
Related topics
Theology
Conceptions of God
Theism
Forms
Concepts
Singular god
theologies
By faith
Concepts
God as
Trinitarianism
Eschatology
By religion
Feminist
Other concepts
Names of God in
By faith
Christian
Hindu
Islamic
Jewish
Pagan
Religion portal
Philosophy
Branches
Branches
Aesthetics
Epistemology
Ethics
Free will
Metaphysics
Mind
Normativity
Ontology
Reality
By era
By era
Ancient
Chinese
Greco-Roman
Indian
Persian
Medieval
East Asian
European
Indian
Islamic
Jewish
Modern
People
Contemporary
Analytic
Continental
Miscellaneous
  • By region
By region
African
Eastern
Middle Eastern
Western
Miscellaneous
Romanticism
Countries
Movements
Themes
Writers
Brazil
France
Germany
Great
Britain
Poland
Portugal
Russia
Serbia
Spain
U.S.
Other
Musicians
Austria
Czechia
France
Germany
Hungary
Italy
Poland
Russia
Serbia
Other
Philosophers
Visual artists
Scholars
Related topics
Age of Enlightenment Modernism

Category

Categories: