Revision as of 01:53, 21 November 2010 view sourceSophie (talk | contribs)3,872 edits →Reply to vandlism message: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:10, 23 December 2020 view source JavaHurricane (talk | contribs)Account creators, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,510 editsm Reverted to revision 891969574 by Ritchie333 (talk): OopsTags: Twinkle Replaced Undo | ||
(843 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
{{troutme}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
|counter = 22 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
|algo = old(3d) | |||
|archive = User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{talkheader}} | |||
'''Please note: Nothing here is ever lost and mistakes can be made. I've made more than my share. If I deleted a page of yours, please feel free to question the deletion. Odds are real good I'll put it back if it isn't nonsense or vandalism. Just be nice. Thanks.''' | |||
== ] == | |||
Dear PMDrive1061, can you offer any concrete advice as to how ] might be improved to allow retention? Best wishes (] (]) 11:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)) | |||
:: Many thanks for the kind comment on my talkpage. I think it is 7 to 4 for deletes at present in the Afd stats (with you among the deletes) - and although I know Afd is not a vote..... I was not sure how it was going - especially with so many WP:A7s. Anyway best wishes (] (]) 19:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)) | |||
::: A gentle nudge (reminder) as the Afd closure is getting close (and I would rather avoid userification and asking for restoration etc....) Best wishes (] (]) 17:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)) | |||
: A solid (if weak) thanks. :) Best wishes (] (]) 20:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)) | |||
== block == | |||
Thank you, you were very diligent in realizing your error so quickly. No apology necessary, scared me there for a minute. I thought that since I write about businesses a lot, I was thought of as an agent of the businesses. As for my article one ] why was it so speedily deleted? I contested the deletion since it was well sourced with quality citations but I never got any talk back on the talk page. Was it deleted because I was blocked? In any case shouldn't it be AfD'd instead of speedy? I believe the topic is quite notable, it is a very popular website and there are similar articles on other websites such as ] and ]. In fact I created it because if you check the what link's here these sites were listed on another article but dudes did not have an article.] (]) 02:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
::thanks, can i remove the speedy too? yeah its not for everyone i just find just about everything interesting and whenever i run into a red link i cant resist...] (]) 03:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:thanks dude, someone already took it off for me, i think i am not allowed to if i create the page, although technically in this case since it was deleted i think you created it lol, have a good one!] (]) 04:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Reply to vandlism message == | |||
{{tb|Sophie#Don't let the idiots get you down.}} | |||
- ] <sup>(])</sup> 01:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:10, 23 December 2020
Redirect to: