Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hodja Nasreddin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:57, 22 November 2010 editHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:40, 20 May 2018 edit undoTheRealWeatherMan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers728 edits Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Glutamate permease. (TW
(417 intermediate revisions by 65 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
---
{{ExamsDIRlong}}


== ] ==
== Narrowing of your topic ban ==


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I would support a narrowing of your topic ban to exclude all non-political topics. However, as you well know, in the Soviet Union ''everything'' was political. The problem I see is that politically motivated editors will try to add a political spin to every sentence about the Soviet Union, or even "Putinist" Russia. In fact I just happened to start working on a humorous "guide" on how it is done (see ]).
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692040667 -->
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Pfam domains ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 18:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
I already proposed that pre-revolutionary Russia be excluded, but I may have misunderstood the present wording.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
For some problem editors in the Eastern Europe topic area a minimal topic ban would inlude ''"any content (edit, section or article) that describes or tries to describe Soviet rule in the Baltics or Eastern Europe as illegal or oppressive or communism as immoral or criminal."'' I cannot recommend that this be allied to you, as you seem to have a conflict with modern Russia.

Could you propose some similar wording for consideration, that would clearly and minimally outline the scope of your conflicts.

-- ] (]) 01:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

:I do not have any "conflict with modern Russia". To the contrary, I love Russian history and culture. Why else I would be editing in this area? Unfortunately, this history was very tragic, and it must be objectively described. I think we both can agree on this. We do not have any disputes. I saw your edits in different areas and consider most of them very much reasonable. ''If'' my topic ban is lifted, we would not have any problems, I hope. And of course, you are very welcome to comment about my amendment request. Please do. The Russian Empire was never a part of my topic ban, and Shell made it very clear. As about the "scope of my conflicts" (as you tell), I currently do not have any conflicts with anyone at this site, you including, and I want to keep it this way in the future. I think you just need to calm down a little and think it through. Very best wishes, ] (]) 01:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

::I agree that it would be useless to limit the ban by allowing editing on the culture and science in the Soviet Union, because this system "politicizes everything spiritual and human". ] (]) 02:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:40, 20 May 2018

---

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pfam domains

Template:Pfam domains has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Glutamate permease for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glutamate permease is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Glutamate permease until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)