| Revision as of 02:15, 23 November 2010 view sourceC. A. Russell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,136 edits →Too-short articles: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:10, 23 December 2020 view source JavaHurricane (talk | contribs)Account creators, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,510 editsm Reverted to revision 891969574 by Ritchie333 (talk): OopsTags: Twinkle Replaced Undo | ||
| (841 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{troutme}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
| |counter = 22 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(3d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{talkheader}} | |||
| '''Please note: Nothing here is ever lost and mistakes can be made. I've made more than my share. If I deleted a page of yours, please feel free to question the deletion. Odds are real good I'll put it back if it isn't nonsense or vandalism. Just be nice. Thanks.''' | |||
| == block == | |||
| Thank you, you were very diligent in realizing your error so quickly. No apology necessary, scared me there for a minute. I thought that since I write about businesses a lot, I was thought of as an agent of the businesses. As for my article one ] why was it so speedily deleted? I contested the deletion since it was well sourced with quality citations but I never got any talk back on the talk page. Was it deleted because I was blocked? In any case shouldn't it be AfD'd instead of speedy? I believe the topic is quite notable, it is a very popular website and there are similar articles on other websites such as ] and ]. In fact I created it because if you check the what link's here these sites were listed on another article but dudes did not have an article.] (]) 02:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::thanks, can i remove the speedy too? yeah its not for everyone i just find just about everything interesting and whenever i run into a red link i cant resist...] (]) 03:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :thanks dude, someone already took it off for me, i think i am not allowed to if i create the page, although technically in this case since it was deleted i think you created it lol, have a good one!] (]) 04:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Reply to vandlism message == | |||
| {{tb|Sophie#Don't let the idiots get you down.}} | |||
| - ] <sup>(])</sup> 01:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Too-short articles == | |||
| ] does not apply to the articles I created. | |||
| A quick step back, first, at least on this issue. I know interactions on Misplaced Pages can be involved and things can turn into a battle. I don't doubt you realize that (and maybe even think about it quite a bit?). There's no hostility meant in this message. | |||
| Also, in the future, please link to some context for future recipients of your messages so it's easier to track down the articles and the rationale used for deletion. As you probably know, deleted articles are expunged from user contribution history. FWIW, deleting these articles only makes it more difficult when I go back to add categories, infoboxes, and interlanguage links, but then I see they have to be recreated (and the URLs culled from my browser history, rather than my user contributions page). | |||
| Thanks for leaving me the message though. I appreciate it. And thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Really. -- ] (<small>]</small>) 02:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:10, 23 December 2020
Redirect to: