Misplaced Pages

User talk:MuZemike: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:03, 24 November 2010 editNcmvocalist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,127 edits →Please stop the cover-up: to the crossmr's frivolous accusation stemming from misuse of npa policy← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:38, 25 December 2024 edit undo50.24.236.43 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic 
Line 1: Line 1:
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Or: The War Room</span>

'''''Gentlemen, you can't ] in here, this is the War Room!'''''

{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|
{{pp-meta
| type =semi
| reason = &#32;due to excessive ] or ]
| explanation-text = That means a few bad eggs have ruined it for everyone, and non-autoconfirmed users will not be able to communicate with me except through ''']'''.
}}
|}}

{| cellpadding="5" cellspacing="10" style="background:#52A629; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px;"
|colspan="2" style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;"|
{{User:MuZemike/Menu}}
|-
<!--
| style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"|
<center>{{User talk rules|bar=n}} Oh, and remember to post new comments and topics at the '''bottom''' of the page or the section in which you are discussing and '''sign''' every post you make here by simply adding four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your message.</center>
|-
| style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"|
*<big>'''Deleted pages'''</big> – if I deleted a page you were involved with in which you have an issue with, talk to me about it first here. I will be happy to ] for you, restore the page if I believed to have made an error in judgment, or fulfill any other request within reason. If you would like a copy of any other deleted page to work on, also let me know. Keep in mind that I '''will not''', for any reason, restore ] or ].
**''See ]''
|-
-->
| style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top"|
{{TOCleft}}
{{archive box|auto=long|style=background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; font-size=large;|bot=MiszaBot III|age=3}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 6 |counter = 11
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 5
|algo = old(72h) |algo = old(72h)
|archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}}
|-
| style="background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; padding: 1em;" valign="top" |

== GiacomoReturned again ==

I am too tired that he has not been blocked yet. When will this be fixed, he should not be talking the way he does to other editors. I will need you to help me on this. <small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 19:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

It's an imposter account, MZ. ] (]) 19:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:He fooled me too. Did I oversleep, and is it April 1 already? ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 20:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
::That's almost as bad as my impersonator above! At least this one got the username and signature down correctly, unlike in the other one (). –] 20:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:::Dave's impostor made one mistake that resulted in his real username being appended to the fake name. The song "The Great Pretender" is running through my head now. (There's also a song "The Great Impostor", but it's not nearly as tuneful.) ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 20:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

== Watch List? ==

Hi MuZemike, you were instrumental is sorting out recently and were able to uncover . This , editing the exact same articles, with the same edits, , . Though they are currently blocked at the minute, could you possibly put this IP on your watch list? It will save a whole load of bother later. Thanks, --<font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 21:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

== Dude. ==

You just blocked Forever forever.

''Damn'' that's apt. ]] 01:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

== Thank you for blocking all of those sockpuppets! ==

{| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;"
|-
|rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | {{#if: {{ifequal|{{{3}}}|alt}}|]|]}}

|style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Working Man's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for blocking all of those sockpuppets created to vandalize my talk pages. ] (]) 01:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
|}

== Not a Barn, Not a Star... ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Sparky Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | With your insane amount of work here with vandalism revisions, page protection, and blocking mixing with always helping out other users with problems, you make Misplaced Pages a great place to be. For that, I hereby award you The Sparky Barnstar. :) Congrats! :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">] • ] • 01:37, 21 November 2010 (UTC)</small>
|}

== ] ==

I note that you blocked this editor as a sock of ]. When I tagged several articles in Indonesian by this editor for speedy deletion as content forks last week, after mechanically translating them into English, I also tagged a similar article by ], so it might be worth looking at this editor as well, if that hasn't been done already. ] (]) 02:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:Thank you; I discovered 7 more socks as a result of that discovery. –] 02:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::Geez, talk about '''''prolific''''' -- over <s>300</s> 270 socks! ] (]) 02:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:::I was thinking '''''moronic''''', myself. ]] 03:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::::'''Morlific?''' ] (]) 04:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

== Per-banned user asking to be reinstated ==

{{tps}}Looks like I offer . First, do you know who he/she is and second is can I take the stuff he said at face value and AGF?--]<sup>]</sup> 17:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:Not at this point, I cannot tell. –] 17:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
{{ygm}}--]<sup>]</sup> 20:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

== Re: No-hitter lists ==

No need to apologize, MuZemike. I only created those no-hitter "lists" because there are lists for other teams now, as well as a navbox for the pages. Of course I knew that these two lists would probably be deleted; I just thought that if the Mets or Padres actually did throw no-hitters in the future, then it would save someone time because the pages would already be here. It is fine by me if they are deleted. - ] (]) 19:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

== Nintendo Power Awards ==

I noticed that you found references for Ninja Gaiden III about the Nintendo Power Awards. Do you have references to other years as well? Maybe one that ] was in? ] (]) 22:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
:Yeah, ''F-Zero'' was that same year, and unfortunately, it received only one nomination for "Best Play Control" in the Super NES category and was runner-up behind '']''. –] 22:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
::Well that sucks. At least I have the Top 200, though. ] (]) 22:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

== Help!! ==

Hi there MUZE, VASCO here,

Please have a look at ] and see what you can do, an anon "user" (don't know if it's his girlfriend or just one lunatic) has been inserting all kind of lies (POV/weasel, saying this player is a ] when he's NOT, etc, etc).

If you check the article's edit history, on 12 June 2010, we already had to put up with this vandal's encyclopedia of mayhem in 16 "marvellous" volumes, which i rolledback. Now, i am sorry but i could not resist, and sent him a message. I did not use any vile language or anything, but i am afraid i might have "fed the troll" (it's very unlikely, though, that he will read anything, as i think he has a dynamic IP).

Sorry for any inconvenience, thank you very much in advance - --] (]) 02:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

:I believe the blocks were made after the fact, so I don't think there is much to worry about here at the moment. –] 02:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

*Sorry, i don't understand, which blocks were made after which fact? Besides, checking the edit history, i can clearly see that the page has never been protected, and both those IP addresses have never received any warning whatsoever (and this is also the same person http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/92.11.162.96). Please elaborate Mike, i am confused on what you are trying to convey... --] (]) 03:09, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

*Well Mike? Can you please explain it to me? - --] (]) 17:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

*Ah, and the same behaviour (adding lies and POV/weasel) has been done for the SECOND TIME by a Portuguese "user" in ]...No comments - --] (]) 17:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

== Intermediate action requested at File:4chan front page 2010.png ==

The description "|Description=A screenshot of 4chan's 2010 front page with new heading logo and footer and a Misplaced Pages Fundraiser banner. Images in the "Recent Images" section are blanked to meet Fair Use criteria." of the file needs to be modified. This modification is non-controversial, as it corrects the description to match the currently protected version. You may find a correct description for the current version at as: "|Description=A screenshot of 4chan's 2009 front page with new heading logo and footer. Images in the "Recent Images" section are blanked to meet Fair Use criteria.
" Such a change would be non-controversial, as this issue is not a part of the content debate which required the protection. Many thanks, ] (]) 13:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

== Request for bot for newsletter delivery ==

On behalf of the ], I'd like to request if MuZebot could be made available to perform the delivery of the project's newsletter to its participants. The newsletter is located ] and the list of participants on whose talk pages it is to be delivered is ]. Any help would be appreciated, since our regular bot is down for a while. Regards, ] (]) 19:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

== Half million Asian and British IPs blocked for 1 to 3 months ==

Hi. I was looking at recent blocks and noticed you'd blocked a giant swath of IPs:
*]
**]
*]
**]
*]
**]
*]
**]
*]
**]
*]
**]
*]
**]
*]
**]

I can't imagine any vandalism or disruption from one person in that range sufficient to justify such a gigantic rangeblock but I may be missing something. What's going on?

Thanks, --<font face="Futura">] <sup>(] • ])</sup> </font> 23:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

:Please see ], unless one has a better idea as to how to handle this. –] 23:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
:Note that there are about 50-60 more abusive account names which are not listed there that have been blocked by myself or by other admins and likely locked by the Stewards. –] 23:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

::I'm not seeing any edits to our articles by the accounts in that checkuser report. Is this really something so bad as to justify blocking off such a big chunk of British IPs?

::If I was calling the shots, I'd let this person just create a bunch of accounts, unblocked, until they got bored. Then I'd block them after they stopped. If they started using the accounts to damage our content, then I'd change that plan but I'm not sure that's their pattern from what I see.


== Precious anniversary ==
::If you haven't already, I strongly recommend you take your decision to the broader community (perhaps at ]) for discussion. I don't feel comfortable with these rangeblocks.
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Three}}
::--<font face="Futura">] <sup>(] • ])</sup> </font> 23:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
--] (]) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
:::OK, first, I will compile a list of every abuse account and every attack page so the community knows what we're dealing with here. Note that this will take a while. –] 23:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
::::Please don't. It took a long time to oversight all of those. I do think, though, that these blocks are a bit large. Huge rangeblocks do far more damage than an abusive account name that lasts for 15 seconds while a steward fills out the form. ]]] 23:45, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
OK, then I have nothing to stand on in the community's view, and hence I have no choice and have unblocked all the ranges. Keep in mind that we let the vandal win here. –] 00:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
:Look, I'm not the boss here and I don't have all the answers. If you think these rangeblocks are the way to go, then I suggest you raise the issue at ]. I also suggest undeleting the SPI page temporarily.
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)


== Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you ==
:I note that we had 1682 edits from 820 IPs in the 7 178.xxx.xxx.xxx ranges during the last 4 months. I tried to get a count of the edits from 179.xxx.xxx.xxx but my text editor crashed; the file was about the same size, so I think you had a comparable number of edits from the 179 range as from the 7 178 ranges combined. If so, that's about 25 to 30 edits/day from those 8 IP ranges.
:--<font face="Futura">] <sup>(] • ])</sup> </font> 01:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @]
::PS, however this ends up getting handled, thanks for all your work investigating and documenting this. --<font face="Futura">] <sup>(] • ])</sup> </font> 01:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself.


are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? ] (]) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
== Please stop the cover-up ==


I’m still held against my will won’t someone help before they kill me, Francisco quinones Jimenez ] (]) 12:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
YMs RfC doesn't address whether or not he should remain an administrator, the scope of the RfC was well detailed and that discussion is outside it's scope. Trying to force a discussion closed moments after it's been added to does nothing but encourage drama.--] (]) 01:28, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
:There is no need to have drama going on at two places at once. I know you don't like how RfC works, but don't accuse me of any wrongdoing when I have absolutely no involvement in this matter besides moving on the discussion at another venue in which somebody else has already started. –] 01:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
:. <s>Are you fucking happy, now?</s> –] 01:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
::(EC)The discussion was started at AN/I, not at RfC/U. The RfC/U also has no bearing on whether or not he retains his bit. That's an entirely separate discussion than any outcome at the RfC. If you look at the statements at the top of the RfC, you'll not that that outcome isn't even on the table there. SO forcing the discussion to a place that wasn't setup to handle it is pointless and drama inducing. The discussion surrounding my reasoning for the removal of his bit is a direct result of disruptive behaviour both in bad blocks and page protections. Those things are disruptive and under the purview of AN/I, not RfC/U. This isn't dispute resolution. It's stopping disruption on the encyclopedia.--] (]) 01:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
:::You know what, you folks deal with it, then. I'll be waiting when this continues at ArbCom. –] 01:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
:::Why are you even listening to ''him'' MuZemike? The Community wasn't ready to agree to its own desysop process; if he wants to complain, tell him to go to ArbCom. Don't feed. ] (]) 01:40, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
::::And don't make veiled personal attacks. You want to debate the merits of the matter at hand feel free.--] (]) 01:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
:::::Your understanding of the Community is seriously off key; that you pretend that concern is a personal attack is really quite sad. I think back when it was being discussed, I did support a Community process of desysopping but the Community did not come to a consensus so it was not adopted. You're certainly not going to get a block by keeping it at ANI; everyone already knows that. So this brings it back to desysopping...nobody is willing to do so unless there is a process in place, and the fact there is none in force at the moment means that the only body which will desysop is ArbCom. And even that's arguably premature given that you even admit dispute resolution is ongoing (aka RfCU). So...which steward has told you that he'll desysop on the basis of ANI? Or is this just more drama for the sake of drama? I'm honestly looking for an honest answer. ] (]) 02:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
:I would concede if you want to archive the upper part of the discussion, but the proposal is fresh. If you want it to go to the archives the proposal could be moved to its own section for discussion.--] (]) 01:47, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
::<small>(now that I am "cooled off" a little, btw, one sentence struck above)</small> There probably is not much a point to close only part of the discussion. I mean, Ncmvocalist has a point, though. Calling for a desysop on ANI is akin to calling for a lynch mob (unless that's the point, then I'll stop while ahead). I say that because nobody has ever been desysopped on the account of an ANI straw poll; even if there is a consensus for it, you or someone would end up probably taking it to ArbCom for investigation, anyways. Hence, I personally don't see much of a point in that, either. Anyways, it's not my board, and I suppose one is entitled to waste one's time there, like we all do at one point or another. –] 01:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:38, 25 December 2024

Dancing House in Prague
Credit: Diego Delso

Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js

Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):

2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present

Precious anniversary

Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily

Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Wild Arms (video game)

Wild Arms (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you

I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @M.Bitton this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself.

are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? 109.64.104.168 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

I’m still held against my will won’t someone help before they kill me, Francisco quinones Jimenez 50.24.236.43 (talk) 12:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)