Talk:BGM-75 AICBM: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:01, 12 December 2010 editDYKUpdateBot (talk \| contribs)Bots, Administrators249,089 edits Article appeared on DYK on 12 December 2010, adding to {{ArticleHistory}}← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 18:35, 11 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,308,318 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|action1result=listed		\|action1result=listed
	\|action1oldid=401665877		\|action1oldid=401665877
			\|action2=GAR
			\|action2result=kept
			\|action2date=19:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
			\|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/BGM-75 AICBM/1
	\|dykdate=12 December 2010		\|dykdate=12 December 2010
	\|dykentry=... that ] for the ''']''' were intended to be 10 times harder than those used by ]?		\|dykentry=... that ] for the ''']''' were intended to be 10 times harder than those used by ]?
	\|currentstatus=GA		\|currentstatus=GA
	\|topic=~~History~~		\|topic=War
			}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=GA\|
		⚫	{{WikiProject Military history\|class=GA\|US=yes\|Weaponry=yes\|Cold-War=yes}}
	}}		}}
⚫	{{~~WPMILHIST~~\|class=GA\|US=yes\|Weaponry=yes\|Cold-War=yes}}

	{{Talk:BGM-75 AICBM/GA1}}		{{Talk:BGM-75 AICBM/GA1}}

			== Can someone explain me, ==

			why this stub is a good article? --] (]) 15:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
			*Because it isn't a stub. The article is over 1500 characters and has defined sections. Also, this is, literally (in the original sense of the term, as opposed to how it's often used nowadays), '''ALL''' the information that is available on this project. - ] <sub>]</sub> 18:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
			:*I think that the article may not to up to GA standard, so I have started a GAR. ] (]) 14:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

			== Possible source ==

			There may be something of use in , used as a reference in the ]. In addition, much of the background info from the Peacekeeper article seems equally applicable to this article.] (]) 00:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,

			I have just modified {{plural:1\|one external link\|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210145700/http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123011845 to http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123011845

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx\|Sourcecheck}}).

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false}}

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 09:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:35, 11 February 2024

BGM-75 AICBM has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 10, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
November 11, 2013	Good article reassessment	Kept

A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 12, 2010.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that silos for the Advanced Intercontinental Ballistic Missile were intended to be 10 times harder than those used by Minutemen?

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:BGM-75 AICBM/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Change the reference on aircraft designations to the one on missile designations.
Done. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Not a whole lot here to cover, but it's comprehensive enough for what was actually done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Can someone explain me,

why this stub is a good article? --David.s.kats (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Because it isn't a stub. The article is over 1500 characters and has defined sections. Also, this is, literally (in the original sense of the term, as opposed to how it's often used nowadays), ALL the information that is available on this project. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

I think that the article may not to up to GA standard, so I have started a GAR. Snowman (talk) 14:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Possible source

There may be something of use in this, used as a reference in the LGM-118 Peacekeeper. In addition, much of the background info from the Peacekeeper article seems equally applicable to this article.Nigel Ish (talk) 00:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BGM-75 AICBM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210145700/http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123011845 to http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123011845

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Categories: