| Revision as of 18:23, 22 February 2006 edit65.122.236.133 (talk) Big Spring, TX← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:19, 26 December 2024 edit undoMeters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers172,127 edits Undid revision 1265282726 by Kanimankwesi (talk) do not edit another user's talk page postTag: Undo |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
__NOTOC__ |
|
'''Welcome to Jamie's talk page!''' |
|
|
|
{{Horizontal TOC}} |
|
|
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------> |
|
|
<!----------- Leave new comments at BOTTOM of page ---------------------> |
|
|
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------> |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:Ohnoitsjamie/Talktemp}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{tmbox|text='''↓↓↓ NEW MESSAGES GO TO THE *BOTTOM*. NOT THE TOP. ↓↓↓'''<Br /><Br /><Br />Please add new messages to the '''bottom of the page'''. If a conversation is started here, I'll respond here; if it starts on your talk page, I'll respond there.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==Contacting me== |
|
|
I prefer to communicate via '''talk pages.''' Please only email me if there is a good reason not to conduct a conversation on a talk page. I '''''do not respond to emails''''' regarding link deletions and other issues that should be discussed on your userpage or the article talk page. |
|
|
|
|
|
===Why did you remove my external links?=== |
|
|
'''''If you've come here because you want to know why I removed some external links you've added''''', please read ], ] and ] first. Because of Misplaced Pages's popularity, it has become a target for folks looking to promote their sites, which is against Misplaced Pages policies. Misplaced Pages is not a free advertising platform. |
|
|
<!------------------------------------------------------------------••••••••••••••••••••----> |
|
|
<!----------- Leave new comments at BOTTOM of page ---------------------> |
|
|
<!------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> |
|
|
|
|
|
{{collapse top|Talk archives}} |
|
|
|
|
====Talk archives==== |
|
====Talk archives==== |
|
*] |
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
====General==== |
|
|
|
*]d |
|
*] |
|
|
|
*] |
|
*] |
|
|
|
*] |
|
*] |
|
|
|
*] |
|
*] |
|
|
|
*] |
|
====Vandalism==== |
|
|
|
*] |
|
*] |
|
|
|
*] |
|
*] |
|
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
{{collapse bottom}} |
|
|
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> |
|
|
<!-- LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF PAGE. IF YOU DO NOT DO THIS, YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED. --> |
|
|
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> |
|
|
|
|
|
'''PLEASE LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT THE *BOTTOM* OF THIS PAGE.''' |
|
|
<!-- =========================================================== --> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Notability references== |
|
|
* Policy |
|
|
** ] |
|
|
** ] (which refers back to the above link) |
|
|
* Essay |
|
|
** ] |
|
|
** ] |
|
|
* School administrators: ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Vandalism == |
|
|
Hello, |
|
|
|
|
|
Just noticed you have blocked the account ApolloBurningEarth as LTA; ] I have made at AIV is another account and an IP of the same user. Thanks! |
|
|
] ] 12:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== General Tinio page == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Jaime, |
|
|
|
|
|
I am new to wikipedia and have been updating the page of our town. Please don't delete what I have been updating. Everything is sourced and if there are items that I failed to put citation, just let me know but no need to delete it. I constantly update the site and later repeat the citations. Just let me know if you think I should add citations and don't delete them. ] (]) 06:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: I will continue to delete anything that violates the policies I've already outlined several times on your page. Please take the time to read about them. <b>] ]</b> 11:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== About your partial block of 2409:40C4:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to block them from ] as well? –] (]) 15:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}} <b>] ]</b> 15:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Disruptive editing by User:TillyFavoured742 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ], an editor by name ] has been deleting sources and sourced information with with no explanation or edit summaries. This has been prevalent on pages such as ] since 14 October. I have addressed him to at least, provide edit summaries or an explanation. I have also informed him on his talk page, to raise issues on the talk pages of articles, of which he has an issue with. But my plea on his talk page has not been respected as he still continues to delete content and sources without any explanation. His edit contributions show similar attempts on other pages as well. ] (]) 21:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Blocking oversight == |
|
|
|
|
|
You posted a block message at {{user|Johan jani}}'s talk page, but didn't actually block the account. He's still trying to spam his blacklisted site, just now with nowiki tags. ] (]) 15:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: Thanks for catching that, fixed! <b>] ]</b> 15:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, |
|
|
|
|
|
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Take the survey ''''''. |
|
|
|
|
|
Kind Regards, |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
=={{noping|Aditya Mondol2013}}== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, entirely up to you, but when you blocked this account I wonder if you took into account that {{redacted}}? ] - ] 15:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{tpw}} sending to oversight.] (]) 16:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Thanks, I missed that. <b>] ]</b> 16:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Filter ] change == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jamie, could you change <code>admin</code> to <code>sysop</code> on line 2? I don't think hits like ] are needed. ] (]) 14:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}} <b>] ]</b> 14:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16#The B}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 04:29, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Maps on the western world page == |
|
|
|
|
|
Im asking again politely remove the map from the western world page! Do you understand that you dont do a correct job? You make this page not neutral and valid at all! Already 2 people disagree with this map and you dont care at all! You use a map that just express an a person's opinion! This map isnt based on facts and history books! So if some people want to help you to improve the pages in wikipedia they cant do anything because you dont listen to them and just remain to your opinions! In this way why you picked this specific map and not another one? Why you insist in this map that its just an opinion??? Really i cant understand you all the editors in wikipedia! The quality of your work is really low! ] (]) 17:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: As I've already told you, you don't get to make unlateral decisions here, per ]. <b>] ]</b> 17:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> |
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|
|
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|
|
|
|
|
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Miscellaneous Filter (1094) == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jamie, |
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like filter 1094 is being caught a lot, probably for edits in good faith, as seen at ], and it shows that you edited the filter the last (I am not edit filter helper). ] is filling up quickly, could you check what's happening? Thanks, ] <big>(]</big> · <small>])</small> 19:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: Looking at it now. <b>] ]</b> 21:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==1.145.0.0/17== |
|
|
Hi, Jamie. |
|
|
It looks like the partial block has made this anon more disruptive than ever. ] (]) 20:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: Upgraded; thanks for the heads up! <b>] ]</b> 20:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Hi Jamie, |
|
|
::Just so you're aware, this block seems to be affecting other Aussies on the Telstra mobile network, including myself. It's a little unfortunate to be caught up in the collateral damage, but I suppose you gotta do what's neccessary. |
|
|
::] (]) 00:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hi, query as to why I have been blocked == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there, just wondering why my IP address has been blocked from creating an account or editing Misplaced Pages pages? I don't recall breaching Misplaced Pages's terms of use. If you could kindly provide a legitimate explanation or otherwise unblock my IP address I would be very appreciativ. Thanks. ] (]) 10:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:The mere fact that you posted here means that you are not blocked. ] (]) 10:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{tpw}} Maybe they mean their ''other'' IP. 49.199.65.140, do you mean another IP?] (]) 10:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Block evasion == |
|
|
|
|
|
I enjoyed a peaceful few weeks after you blocked them, but I see a ]. Would you be kind enough to do something about this? ] | ] | 21:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: Before I make any more blocks around this range, would you mind explaining how the edits are disruptive? I see a lot of changes to political parties, but I'm under the impression that in parlimentary systems that isn't uncommon in some cases, though I know very little about Pakistani politics. I trust your judgement, but I'd feel better if I understood the nature of the disruption a bit better. <b>] ]</b> 22:05, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Someone unhappy with recent election results have been trying to flip them so winner is the candidate of the party which they wanted to win, this has been going on since August on most pages in violation of ]. ] | ] | 22:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::: I've blocked . Do all, or only some, of those recent edits need to be rolled back? <b>] ]</b> 23:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Another email sent == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've sent you another email related to some of your private filters, but I use a new email address provider -- please do not use my old Outlook email if you have contacted me before. Thanks. ] 🤔 ] 18:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jamie, I need help at the above article. There is something wrong with the info box formatting. For the life of me, I can't see what is wrong with it. I'm thinking it might be the template? Can you take a look please? ] (]) 20:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Ffs, I'm a moron. I looked and looked. New glasses needed. Thank you so much. |
|
|
:: Glad to help! I made a mistake once. Maybe twice. <b>] ]</b> 20:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I stopped counting mine around about 50! |
|
|
Your talk page is a wee bit unusual. I started my message in mobile view, which worked fine, I then couldn't use mobile to reply. I swapped to desktop, lots of talk pages for users only allow desktop edits, but it wouldn't let me use reply either so I had to change to 'edit source' and indent to reply. Not a problem, and it is your talk page. I just wasn't sure if you're aware that reply doesn't work on mobile or desktop view. Thank you for also fixing the place of birth.] (]) 21:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::: I just opened it in mobile. Not sure why the reply option doesn't include your most recent comment. BTW, don't forgot to sign your posts in talk pages with four <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> (Possible, though unlikely, that the mobile app is getting confused by missing sigs?) <b>] ]</b> 21:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Double ffs lol. I thought I had got uses to signing when in desktop. That's one of the things I like about mobile editing. ] (]) 21:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Question == |
|
|
|
|
|
You sometimes deal with them, so I figured I'd ask (current 'strategy' making posting this elsewhere inconvenient as well):<br>Should ranges like ] be blocked? I know there's many more servers to pick from and that the majority of them is just residential devices with IPs that do change overtime (as costumer IPs tend to do), but it's curious that for some rare cases the /16 has been used multiple times... – ] (]) (]) 23:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: That's the first time I've seen that LTA hit the same range multiple times (most of their proxies are from disparate ranges). I've blocked it temporarily given that it's mostly been abused by that LTA in the last few months (i.e., hopefully not much other "collateral.") Thanks for bringing that to my attention. <b>] ]</b> 01:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: I saw that one in the (which is really not very useful, updates too slowly and only shows the /16 ranges of used IPs for privacy) that range shows up quite often as one of the most recent connections (maybe it's multiple servers under the same range? or maybe it's listed first? not sure why). There are other ranges from that log that have been used by them more than once, but that one had the most (that I saw). |
|
|
:: Funnily ] appears in the log many times, but it's blocked for unrelated reasons (also block history). – ] (]) (]) 04:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Political party disc logos == |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Ohnoitsjamie, |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! I have a question regarding logos for United States political parties on Misplaced Pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
Most political parties in the United States have logos on their Misplaced Pages page. However, about half of these images are not free images and thus cannot be included in the ] article. As a result, users have created logos known as “disc logos” or “election discs” to represent the parties. These logos |
|
|
|
|
|
* Are based on the original political party logos or a symbol associated with the party—for example, the ] is based on the ], a symbol associated with the party |
|
|
* Feature the party’s logo or such a symbol in the middle of a circle, all of which is more often than not one color. |
|
|
|
|
|
For examples of election discs, see the above-linked disc and the US political parties list article (also linked above). |
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, just over half of the political parties in the United States have election discs on Misplaced Pages on the political parties list article (due to non-free images being banned there), on their official page under the header “Election symbol”, and/or on election pages (ex. the ] article features the election discs of the Republican, Democratic, Libertarian, Green, and Constitution parties). These images are unofficial, but can be useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
However, recently an editor has informed me that the election symbols, due to being original research, should not be used. Personally, I was reading the original research policy and, although I might be trying to preserve the election discs, I believe that the discs might still be used if they are explicitly labeled as unofficial. (For example, I have already put such a note saying this up on the US political parties list.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think the discs can still be used? If so, where? (Only on the list page, or wherever they have been used in the past?) Should the discs only contain certain things (ex. only be derived from the logo of the party or a symbol associated with the party?) Essentially, what are your thoughts on this? |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! ] (]) 16:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: I don't think this isn't the sort of thing a single adminsistrator can unilaterally decide. While I understand wanting to have "symmettry" in being able to apply discs, I would lean toward the "no original research" policy in this case in an RFC on the matter. <b>] ]</b> 16:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Ok. Is it ok if the discs are used with a warning that they are unofficial and are merely based on the party’s logos? Thanks! PS: I’m sorry for editing in the source editor—it wouldn’t let me reply. ] (]) 18:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::: I'm not a big fan of warnings/disclaimers either. I think you should seek a consensus or start an ] at ]; if you could do, you could post a link to it at ] or any other relevant projects to seek additional input. This isn't the sort of thing that should be decided by a single admin, especially me, as I'm not particularly active in building politics-related pages. <b>] ]</b> 19:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: Ok—thanks! I just added a general request for comment (NOT an RFC) on the talk page for the US political parties list. If I don’t get a lot of replies, I’ll start an RFC. Do you think this is a good plan? (I’m sorry—I’m still relatively new to Misplaced Pages, and this is my first time doing something like this.) ] (]) 20:18, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::: Yes, that's a good course of action. <b>] ]</b> 20:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::: RFC posted—once it’s up on the RFC list I’ll put a link to it on the American politics board.<br />Thanks for your help! ] (]) 15:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::: Based on the responses to the RFC, it appears that the general consensus is to not use the disc logos (one of them has already been deleted from Wikimedia Commons). In addition, it appears that using party color to identify the parties might be the better path.<br />As a result, I have created an edited version of the infobox political party template which features party color more prominently—what do you think? ] ] (]) 14:32, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::: Other than the accessibility issue (for colorblind folks), using colors is probably the next best thing in the absense of a free logo. It's somewhat suprising that a political party wouldn't publish a free logo. <b>] ]</b> 15:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::: Ok. So then am I good to add the colorful-ish infobox template to the US political party pages? (I wouldn’t replace the general infobox, but would instead make a new one.) Thanks! ] (]) 15:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Highgate == |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear @], |
|
|
|
|
|
I hope this message finds you well. I am ]. I noticed you commented on my false report complaint. Thank you very much for correcting me. I am writing to you to shed light on what you did next. Once you did that, you proceeded to go to the article ] and revert my citations used to source the London boroughs, and you said in your edit summary that the citations weren't useful. I would like to humbly disagree with you here. The reason why I am disagreeing with you is because Misplaced Pages relies on verifiability, not the truth. The only instance that it is fine to not use citations is in the lead, when ] is cited in the article body. I have not come to cause more not useful havoc, (I am very sorry if you think I am), I am here to shed light on the mistake. I would like to have a conversation with you on maybe going over your mistake and maybe reverting it to stick to Misplaced Pages's guidelines. If you think I made a mistake, please do tell me. |
|
|
|
|
|
Kind regards, |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 15:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: Thank you for educating me on the ways of Misplaced Pages. We do not need Brittanica references in the lede for information that is inherent in any map of London boroughs. We also don't need silly trivia about how Underground announcements pronounce words. <b>] ]</b> 16:12, 15 December 20welcome.) |
|
|
|
|
|
: You are most welcome. I am most sorry for the Britannia references and the Underground announcements. Just a question, I have copied the Underground part from the pronunciation content on the article. Would you suggest me or you deleting that? ] (]) 16:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: I already deleted it. <b>] ]</b> 16:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:: Sorry, I did not see. Thank you very much for your help. ] (]) 16:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
====Deletion==== |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Notice of continued disruption by user you partially blocked == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I noticed you partially blocked the IP @] on the 12th of November for being a sock. It appears that they have continued to be disruptive. I wasn't sure what to do with this so I decided to bring it to your attention ({{strikethrough|and also sorry if I get the formatting of this talk page wrong, I just hit "new section"}} nevermind, it worked!) ] 12:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
: That partial block was for a very large range (/34). For IPv6 (long) IP addresses, /64 ranges usually are more likely to be limited to a single user or small subset of devices, whereas lower numbers like /34 are likely to cover many thousands of users. I try to avoid full blocks of large ranges because we're more likely to affect good editors, but sometimes it's unavoidable, especially for mobile ranges. For the disruption you're describing above, it's unlikely to be the same user I targeted in my partial block; please use ] if they continue.<b>] ]</b> 13:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
== Possible sock == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible sock activity . Please have a look - ] (]) 12:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article. "El juego" means "the game" in Spanish, so it's a legitimate redirect IMHO. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">''']]]''' <small>{]}</small></span> 00:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
: Blocked, thanks! <b>] ]</b> 13:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Regarding emails == |
|
|
Hey, Jamie. Listen, this is a very late reply to your ], but the reason for that is that I wanted to be sure that the Auckland troll's attention had faded. The only reason I utilized emails was that I, along with you, were being harassed and I didn't want them to know that I was so much as acknowledging their existence, but something had to be done. I at least hope it doesn't matter now that I'm replying publicly to you. But, I hope you understand why I went about the way I did. ''']'''<sub> (]•])</sub> 17:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== New political party template for US parties == |
|
==Football Aid== |
|
|
I've noticed you did an edit on ] back a while ago. I nominated the article at ]. Maybe you can help out by voting and do more edits. There are also more articles you can do and you can nominate articles yourself.] 00:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear OhNoitsJamie, |
|
== Another Esperanzial note... == |
|
|
|
I’m sorry to bug you (again), but I was wondering something. |
|
Hi again Esperanzians! Well, since our last frolic in the realms of news, the Advisory Council has met twice more (see ''']''' and ''']'''). As a result, '''] has been ammended''' twice (see for details) and all of the shortcuts have been standardised (see the ] for more details). Also of note is the '''Valentines ball''' that will take place in on the 14th of February (tomorrow). It will start at 6pm UTC and go on until everyone's had enough! I hope to see you all there! Also, '''the spamlist has been dissolved''' - all Esperanzians will now recieve this update "newsletter". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you probably remember, I started an RFC on the US political party disc logos, and the consensus was that they should be removed. However, I took away from ] (maybe wrongly) that party color should be used instead to identify the parties. |
|
The other major notice I need to tell you about is the upcoming ''']'''. These will take place from '''12:00 UTC on ]th to 11:59 UTC on ]th'''. The official handing-over will take place the following day. Candidates are able to volunteer any time before the 20th, so long as they are '''already listed on ]'''. Anyone currently listed on the memberlist can vote. In a change since last time, ''if you have already been a member of the leadership, you may run again''. Due to the neutrality precident, I will not vote for anyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result, I have created a ] which can be used to identify political parties based on their color. However, I have some questions regarding implementing it. |
|
Yours, as ever, Esperanzially,<br /> |
|
|
--]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 09:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)<br /> |
|
|
<small>(message delivered by ] using ] on ] behalf)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I first implemented it by putting the template on Misplaced Pages proper (it is ]) and by putting it on minor political party pages as a test run. However, another editor told me that I shouldn’t do that without a consensus, resulting in my removing the template from the pages where it had been put up and asking for a consensus on the US politics WikiProject task force page. When that talk post failed to get any responses, I started ], but it was taken down due to an error on my part (I didn’t include a link to the previous talk post—I have fixed this error). However, when talking with the editor who took it down the idea that it could have been a WP:TALK violation came up (it might be a continuation of the previous RFC, but it was after it was recommended to me that the old RFC be shut down). |
|
== OhNoItsJamie's Deletionist Bullying == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I’m sorry if this is confusing—please let me know if you need anything to be cleared up. |
|
*Removed my redirection from the Spanish name for The Game, 'El Juego' as supposedly nonsense vandalism . Later apologises to another Misplaced Pages user saying 'I guess I was too hasty in tagging that one'... |
|
|
*Removes my addition that '''Aphex Twin (aka Richard D. James) grew up in Carharrack''' whilst leaving the info about his album. Which is more important, that he named a remix after it or he grew up there? |
|
|
*Removed etymology of skunk (cannabis) from the strain Skunk No. 1 |
|
|
*Removed a link to my How to Skin Up Guide (), more informative and detailed than any of the other guides and including photos, all the other inferior links were left untouched. |
|
|
*Removed my link to , from page, even though it is by far the most comprehensive Game-related website. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it ok if I seek a third opinion (namely yours) on whether or not the template should be implemented instead of holding an RFC? Here are ]’s feelings on the matter: |
|
A look through OhNoItsJamie's contributions reveals a rampant deletionist attitude having no respect for the opinions and knowledge of others. ] 23:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
”Establishing a new template as a standard requires consensus, and I, for one, oppose it. There is no reason why American parties should be presented differently from other parties. The colors are already displayed in the infobox, and adding a large colored area is ugly imo” |
|
: '''Response''' I'm not the only one who has reverted your edits, most of which consisted of link spam for your losethegame.com site (your registration of that domain can be confirmed via ). The spam warning template that's been applied to your talk page clearly states the policy regarding using Misplaced Pages to drive traffic to your site. The other edits were reverted because they were unsourced and/or unencylopedic. The info about ] was reverted because it accompanied a spam link to your site. You're welcome to restore that information (assuming that it's verifiable). I'm sorry if you're upset that the "Pez" article of your that I nominated for deletion was removed via an afd vote (which now has been recreated with no attempt to address issues raised in the afd vote). I stand by my editing history. <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 03:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, if an RFC is required, is the new RFC (on the use of the template) a WP:TALK violation due to being a sort-of Part 2 to the first RFC (on disc logos)? |
|
== Re: Bill Clinton == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I’m sorry for the long post (again). Again, please let me know if you need anything cleared up. |
|
Regarding your comments on my talk page. My nullyfying your edit and bringing back vandalism was an accident. While you were reverting the page, I was doing a revert of my own. However, I was accidently reverting the vandalism back, not the trusted article. Just a little error on my part. Sorry for the problem. --] 18:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! ] (]) 15:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Re: Big Spring, Texas == |
|
|
|
: I would agree with that other editor that you'd need to establish a consensus first to apply your new template in a topic area where there is a lot of participation as well as established conventions and templates. Most of my edits to topics related to American politics are administrative actions in cases of obvious vandalism or other disruption. I'm generally not involved with template creation or establishment. <b>] ]</b> 15:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Ok—thanks! Do you think I can put the RFC back up? ] (]) 16:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::: You are welcome to do that, you don't need my permission to proceed. <b>] ]</b> 17:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: Ok—thanks! I’m sorry. ] (]) 17:07, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:I was not made aware of any discussion started on replacing the infobox. I only follow WikiProject Politics/Political parties and WikiProject Elections and Referendums. ] (]) 17:25, 18 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Question about the removal of my edit on the "Handyman" page == |
|
Okies. Thanks. --<font color="green">'''Zsinj'''</font><font color="gray"><sup>]</sup></font> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, Ohnoitsjamie, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that you reverted my edit on the "Handyman" page on December 19, 2024. I tried to follow Misplaced Pages's guidelines by keeping the content neutral and adding reliable sources. |
|
==Skinupperology== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could you kindly explain what was deemed inappropriate about my edit? If there are any suggestions or issues to address, I would be happy to revise the content accordingly. |
|
Why do you keep removing this link, it is more informative than any of the others you have left. ] 21:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your time and response. |
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best regards, Resear4er ] (]) 03:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
I didn't even notice it was paraphrased. The first sentence of both paragraphs sounded very familiar and I ''assumed'' this was more stubborn editing from the same anon editor with that other ip address. Feel free to unrevert me if you think it is the right thing to do. Sorry! ] 02:16, 17 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
: It's pretty obvious that you are spamming, and I'm not interested in discussing it further with you. The warnings on your talk page make it pretty clear what will happen if you do it again. <b>] ]</b> 11:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Blacklist == |
|
'''ohnoitsjamie has a long history of deletionist bullying tactics in order to enforce his POV particularly in regards to advocating his "Chamber of Commerce" whitewash of the Big Spring article.''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dear, I have noticed Radar Chronicle is an reliable source. Few editors used it for vandalism purposes mass edit using that site. I appeal you to remove \bradarchronicle\.com\b from blocklist. ] (]) 07:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== 3rr noticeboard == |
|
|
|
: There is an approximately 0.000% chance of that happening. I appeal you to not message me about it again. <b>] ]</b> 11:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Copyright infringement. == |
|
Hi. I've just archived the noticeboard, including some of your reports that didn't get an answer. They are now stale, so need to be archived, but you may well have got a raw deal. If the problems continue, leave me a message next time you leave a report. Sometimes these things slip through, especially as there is no-one responsible (formally or informally) for checking that page. ] 14:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello! |
|
== Spam == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merry Christmas! |
|
Great work reverting that anon spamming hockey pages! However, you rv'ed my category additions in the process. I partially reverted to restore them. Just thought I'd let you know. Take care. ] (]) 20:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
==67.49.215.174== |
|
|
This is a public IP adress of my road runner cable modem. I have it hooked up to an unprotected wireless network. I live in an apartment complex. I know that some vandalism comes from this IP adress(probably from my neighbors), but I do legitimate contributions here. Could you please not block this IP? If the vandalism continues, I could possibly encrypt the network. --] 04:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My name is Adam, and I represent . I noticed that content from our website was added to the Misplaced Pages page ]] at 05:13, 12 July 2024. I would like to point out that these materials are protected by copyright: The History of RV Trailers - https://rvrentservice.com/the-history-of-rv-trailers.html |
|
== Chonga == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have invested significant time and effort in creating scientifically based content for internet users, including references to reliable sources. According to our viewership statistics, our content attracts substantial interest, underscoring its importance. |
|
* ] was an article that went through AfD a few days ago about the exact same racially stereotyping bullshit only about hispanic girls in south Florida. — ] <small>(]) (]) – February 20, 2006, 05:01 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, our website is commercial; however, our blog operates separately from advertising and serves as a non-commercial platform, providing access to high-quality information without direct monetization. We have no objection to the use of our materials on Misplaced Pages, as it promotes the dissemination of knowledge, but it is crucial that a link to the original source is included. |
|
==VfD : Moog records== |
|
|
Please read and consider ]. -- ] <small>(])</small> 14:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I kindly ask you to review this matter and restore the link to our website in accordance with Misplaced Pages's principles, which require the citation of sources to ensure the accuracy of information. |
|
== RE. BS. TX == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you in advance for your understanding and cooperation. |
|
Hey, Ohnoitsjamie, I'm afraid that the answer to your request for semi protection is no. SP not an option here. Unless the page is being heavily vandalized, semi protection is not applicable. For major disputes full protection can be an option. As I am rather unfamiliar with this situation, (since my protection of the article a week or so ago, I have not given much attention to it) I have the article on the CVU's watchlist in so it is being monitored for major changes. If you would like to request protection please list it at ]. Thanks ] 02:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:It looks to me like this guy is more in violation of WP:POINT. Try getting someone to help with that. <small>]]] | ]</small> 03:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, Adam ] (]) 00:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
lol, I'm pretty sure I missed some of the reverts even with that huge list. I originally made it thinking it might be useful if RFAr comes up, but I don't think it will come to that. ~ ]] 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:{{tpw}} {{yo| AdamSmit26}} While we wait for Jamie to reply, please allow me to point you to the ]. For copyright problems, it is best to contact the VRT team. Per ], info-en-c{{@}}wikimedia.org handles reports that Misplaced Pages is violating your or someone else's copyright. Hope this helps. ] (]) 06:11, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: I removed the sentence that was copied verbatum from your website and also ]'d all revisions that contained that sentence. Regardless of whether or not your site was used as a reference, we do not permit copyrighted content to be reproduced directly in Misplaced Pages. I will not be restoring any links to your website, as it was spammed repeatedly by . Any further spamming of your site will result in a ]. <b>] ]</b> 12:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Editor wants to connect "Akan people" with Ancient Egypt and Nubia without reliable sources. == |
|
::Jamie, that anon is dangersouly close to violating 3RR. <small>]]] | ]</small> 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings ]. This editor ] is hellbent on ], where he edits on the origin section by using oral history, claiming that the Akans came from underground and settled in ancient Egypt and Nubia. Even worse, this editor provides no journal, secondary source, primary evidence, or scientific material. His only source is an international conference posted on . User Kanimankwesi has been addressed on ] for a year now by experienced editors about the value of reliable sources and fringe theories. But he is very difficult to cooperate with. Especially when he believes he is a descendant of Rameses III. ] (]) 23:33, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Ok, I posted one more good faith request for reasons on the talk page and both anon editors pages. If this is not answered, we will wait a day and then remove the tag. At that point, any anon actions are vandalism. <small>]]] | ]</small> 04:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
Done 
wikimedia.org handles reports that Misplaced Pages is violating your or someone else's copyright. Hope this helps. 
.svg){kind=link}