Misplaced Pages

ImClone stock trading case: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:14, 13 January 2011 edit192.101.252.103 (talk) →Indictment and SEC charges← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:51, 29 August 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,815 edits Rescued 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#cbsnews.com/stories 
(113 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|SEC probe of Martha Stewart}}
A ] and U.S. Attorney probe of trading in the shares of ] resulted in a widely publicized criminal case, which resulted in prison terms for media celebrity ], ImClone chief executive officer ] and Stewart's broker at Merrill Lynch, Peter Bacanovic. A ] and U.S. Attorney probe into trading in the shares of ] resulted in a widely publicized criminal case, which resulted in prison terms for businesswoman and television personality ], ImClone ] ], and Stewart's broker at ], Peter Bacanovic.


==History== ==History==
⚫ ImClone's stock price dropped sharply at the end of 2001 when its drug ], an experimental ], failed to get the expected ] (FDA) approval. It was later revealed by the ] that prior to the announcement (after the close of trading on December 28) of the FDA's decision, numerous executives sold their stock.<ref name=Stewart>{{cite book |title=Tangled Webs: How False Statements are Undermining America: From Martha Stewart to Bernie Madoff |last=Stewart |first=James |author-link=James B. Stewart |year=2011 |publisher=] |location=New York City |isbn=9781594202698 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/tangledwebshowfa00stew}}</ref> ImClone's founder, ], was arrested in 2002 on ] charges for instructing friends and family to sell their stock, and attempting to sell his own. His daughter, Aliza Waksal, sold $2.5 million in shares on December 27. His father, Jack Waksal, sold $8.1 million in shares over the 27th and 28th; company executives followed suit. John B. Landes, the general counsel, sold $2.5 million in shares on December 6. Ronald A. Martell, the vice president for marketing and sales, sold $2.1 million in shares on December 11. Four other executives sold shares in the following weeks as well. Later, founder Waksal pleaded guilty to various charges, including ], and on June 10, 2003, was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison.
{{Unreferenced section|date=December 2007}}
ImClone's stock price dropped sharply at the end of 2001 when its drug ], an experimental ] failed to get the expected ] (FDA) approval. It was later revealed by the ] that prior to the announcement (after the close of trading on December 28) of the FDA's decision numerous executives sold their stock.


⚫ ], the founder of ], also became embroiled in the scandal after it emerged that her broker, Peter Bacanovic, tipped her off that ImClone was about to drop. In response, Stewart sold about $230,000 in ImClone shares on December 27, 2001, a day before the announcement of the FDA decision. Stewart's involvement would have never come to light had Doug Faneuil, Bacanovic's assistant, not disclosed it to investigators.<ref name=Stewart/> Although Stewart maintained her innocence, she was found guilty and sentenced on July 16, 2004, to five months in prison, five months of home confinement, and two years' probation for lying about a stock sale, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice.
⚫ Its founder, ], was arrested in 2002 on ] charges for informing friends and family to sell their stock, and attempting to sell his own. His daughter, Aliza Waksal, sold $2.5 million in shares on December 27. His father, Jack Waksal, sold $8.1 million in shares over the 27th and 28th. Company executives followed suit too. John B. Landes, the general counsel, sold $2.5 million in shares on December 6. Ronald A. Martell, the vice president for marketing and sales, sold $2.1 million in shares on December 11. Four other executives sold shares in the following weeks as well. Later, founder Waksal pleaded guilty to various charges, including ], and on June 10, 2003, was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison.


⚫ Ultimately a new clinical trial and FDA filing prepared by ImClone's partner ] ("German Merck" not to be confused with the U.S. company of similar name) resulted in an FDA approval of Erbitux in 2004 for use in colon cancer.
⚫ ], the founder of ], also became embroiled in the scandal after it emerged that she sold about $230,000 in ImClone shares on December 27, 2001 just a day before the announcement of FDA decision. Although Stewart maintained her innocence, she was found guilty and sentenced on July 16, 2004 to five months in prison, five months of home confinement, and two years probation for lying about a stock sale, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice.


⚫ A Congressional hearing on improprieties at ImClone, held in October 2002, unveiled a culture of corruption dating back to 1986. This was the year that ImClone CEO Waksal first forged the signature of the company's general counsel John Landes (one of the three original employees of the company) for financial gain. Nonetheless, Landes defended Waksal's illegal actions at the hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, portraying the forgery as "a good-faith misunderstanding". The subcommittee's chairman, ] of ], replied, "My children know better than that, Mr. Landes." Further questioning about this and subsequent forgeries on Waksal's part revealed that neither Landes, the chief legal officer of the company, nor the company's outside directors reported Waksal's actions to proper authorities or made any moves to have Waksal removed as CEO. Instead, testimony revealed that they initiated their own internal investigation, which was never concluded.
⚫ Ultimately a new clinical trial and FDA filing prepared by Imclone's partner ] ("German Merck" not to be confused with the US company of similar name) resulted in an FDA approval of Erbitux in 2004 for use in colon cancer.


⚫ The FDA's February 2004 announcement of approval for use of Erbitux for treatment of colorectal cancer reported that conclusions were drawn from a trial involving 329 patients, of which 10.8% responded when Erbitux was used by itself, delaying tumor growth by 1.5 months. When used in conjunction with a standard treatment irinotecan, 22.9% of patients responded and tumor growth was delayed by approximately 4.1 months.
⚫ A Congressional hearing on improprieties at ImClone, held in October 2002, unveiled a culture of corruption dating back to 1986. This was the year that ImClone CEO Waksal first forged the signature of the company's general counsel John Landes (one of the three original employees of the company) for financial gain. Nonetheless, Landes defended Waksal's illegal actions at the hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, portraying the forgery as "a good-faith misunderstanding," to which Representative James Greenwood replied "My children know better than that, Mr. Landes." Further questioning about this and subsequent forgeries on Waksal's part revealed that neither Landes, the chief legal officer of the company, or the company's outside directors reported Waksal's actions to proper authorities or made any moves to have Waksal removed as CEO. Instead, testimony revealed that they initiated their own internal investigation, which was never concluded. The decades-long tolerance for Waksal's fraud, starting from the company's earliest days, provoked Representative Peter Deutsch to refer to the ongoing misconduct as "wacky."


⚫ In September 2001, ] committed $2 billion (including a $1 billion up-front cash payment) for less than 20% of ImClone due to what was called at the time the drug's "blockbuster" potential.
⚫ The FDA's February 2004 announcement of approval for use of Erbitux for treatment of colrectal cancer reported that conclusions were drawn from a trial involving 329 patients, of which 10.8% responded when Erbitux was used by itself, delaying tumor growth by 1.5 months. When used in conjunction with a standard treatment irinotecan, 22.9% of patients responded and tumor growth was delayed by approximately 4.1 months.


⚫ In January 2006, the company was put up for sale but failed to find any buyers, likely because Erbitux by that time faced significant competition in the medical marketplace. ImClone directors withdrew the sale of the company in mid-2006.
⚫ In September 2001, Bristol-Meyers Squibb committed $2 billion (including a $1 billion up-front cash payment) for less than 20% of ImClone due to what was called at the time the drug's "blockbuster" potential.


⚫ In April 2009, ] purchased ImClone Systems Inc. for an estimated $6.8 billion.
⚫ In January 2006, the company was put up for sale but failed to find any buyers, likely because Erbitux by that time faced significant competition in the medical marketplace. ImClone directors withdrew the sale of the company in mid-2006.

⚫ In April 2009, The Wall Street Journal reported that Eli Lilly & Co. purchased ImClone Systems Inc. for an estimated $6.8 Billion USD.


==Indictment and SEC charges== ==Indictment and SEC charges==


Waksal was arrested June 12, 2002 on charges of conspiring to commit ]. On October 15, he pleaded guilty to charges of ], ], ], and ]. Waksal was arrested June 12, 2002, on charges of conspiring to commit ]. On October 15, he pleaded guilty to charges of ], ], ], and ].


On March 3, 2003 he pleaded guilty to charges of ] and ] for avoiding $1.2 million in sales taxes on $15 million in artwork. The art included works by ], ], ], and ], purchased between June 2000 and October 2001. He did not pay the necessary taxes at the time of purchase, but did pay the taxes in fall 2002. On March 3, 2003, he pleaded guilty to charges of ] and ] for avoiding $1.2 million in sales taxes on $15 million in artwork. The art included works by ], ], ], and ], purchased between June 2000 and October 2001. He did not pay the necessary taxes at the time of purchase, but paid in fall 2002.


On June 10, 2003, Waksal was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison and ordered to pay more than $4 million in fines and back taxes, all the maximum punishments allowable under law. Waksal was released in 2009. On June 10, 2003, Waksal was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison and ordered to pay more than $4 million in fines and back taxes, all the maximum punishments allowable under law. Waksal was released in 2009.


On June 4, 2003, a federal grand jury in ] indicted Stewart and her former broker, Peter Bacanovic on nine criminal counts. The government alleged that, by selling when she did, Stewart avoided losses of $45,673. The charges included securities fraud, ], and ]. Stewart plead not guilty, saying she had a standing order with Bacanovic to sell her shares if ] stock fell below $60. Stewart resigned as CEO and chairman of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia on the same day she was indicted, but remained on the company's board.<ref></ref> On June 4, 2003, a federal grand jury in ] indicted Stewart and her former broker, Peter Bacanovic, on nine criminal counts. The government alleged that, by selling when she did, Stewart avoided losses of $45,673. The charges included securities fraud, ], and ]. Stewart pleaded not guilty, saying she had a standing order with Bacanovic to sell her shares if ] stock fell below $60. Stewart resigned as CEO and chairman of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia on the same day she was indicted, but remained on the company's board.<ref>, CNN, June 4, 2004.</ref>


The day after her ], Stewart took out a full-page advertisement in '']'' and launched a website with an open letter of defense "to my friends and loyal supporters." She said, "I want you to know that I am innocent &mdash; and that I will fight to clear my name... The government's attempt to criminalize these actions makes no sense to me... I am confident I will be exonerated of these baseless charges." The day after her indictment, Stewart took out a full-page advertisement in '']'' and launched a website with an open letter of defense "to my friends and loyal supporters." She said, "I want you to know that I am innocent—and that I will fight to clear my name... The government's attempt to criminalize these actions makes no sense to me... I am confident I will be exonerated of these baseless charges."


On the day she was indicted, the ] filed a civil complaint against Stewart with charges of insider trading (for violating § 17(a) of the ], § 10(b) of the ], and ]). The civil charges were stayed pending the criminal proceeding. On the day she was indicted, the ] filed a civil complaint<ref></ref> against Stewart with charges of insider trading (for violating § 17(a) of the ], § 10(b) of the ], and ]).<ref></ref> The civil charges were stayed pending the criminal proceeding.<ref></ref>


==Trial== ==Trial==
Stewart's trial was initially set for January 12, 2004, at the request of her lawyers who said they needed plenty of time to analyze the evidence. The trial eventually began on January 20 in New York City presided over by U.S. District Judge ]. During the trial, Stewart maintained her innocence.<ref>"Stewart Asks to Start Prison Sentence; She says she wants to put this behind her so she can move on with her life and career," Los Angeles Times, Sept. 16, 2004</ref> Stewart's trial was initially set for January 12, 2004, at the request of her lawyers who said they needed more time to analyze the evidence. The trial eventually began on January 20 in New York City presided over by U.S. District Judge ].<ref>''United States v. Stewart'' (Stewart I), 305 F. Supp. 2d 368, 378 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).</ref> During the trial, Stewart maintained her innocence.<ref>"Stewart Asks to Start Prison Sentence; She says she wants to put this behind her so she can move on with her life and career", ''Los Angeles Times'', September 16, 2004.</ref>


On February 27, 2004, Judge Cederbaum threw out the charge of securities fraud which could have led to up to 10 years in prison and a million dollar fine. The judge found that "no reasonable juror can find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant lied for the purpose of influencing the market for the securities of her own company." <ref></ref> On February 27, 2004, Judge Cederbaum dismissed the charge of securities fraud, which could have led to up to ten years in prison and a $1 million fine. The judge found that "no reasonable juror can find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant lied for the purpose of influencing the market for the securities of her own company."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090228195308/http://www.thestreet.com/funds/gregggreenberg/10145967.html |date=2009-02-28 }} TheStreet.com, February 27, 2004.</ref>


===Verdict=== ===Verdict===
The jury deliberated for three days following the five-week trial before reaching its verdict. On March 5, 2004, Stewart was found guilty by a ] of eight women and four men on all four remaining counts against her: conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of ].<ref name="titleStewart found guilty on all counts in obstruction trial - Mar. 10, 2004">{{cite news |url=http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/05/news/companies/martha_verdict/index.htm |title=Stewart found guilty on all counts in obstruction trial - Mar. 10, 2004 |accessdate=2007-12-25 |work=CNN | date=March 5, 2004}}</ref> She was not found guilty of one of the most publicized charges: having falsely claimed that there was an agreement to sell her shares when they fell to $60.00. The jury did find that Stewart lied and obstructed justice on other grounds, including her claim that she was reminded of the prior $60.00 agreement and urged to sell on that basis. The jury deliberated for three days following the five-week trial. On March 5, 2004, Stewart was found guilty by the ] of eight women and four men on all four remaining counts: conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://money.cnn.com/2004/03/05/news/companies/martha_verdict/index.htm |title=Stewart found guilty on all counts in obstruction trial|access-date=2007-12-25 |work=CNN | date=March 5, 2004}}</ref> She was found not guilty of one of the most publicized charges: having falsely claimed that there was an agreement to sell her shares when they fell to $60. The jury found that Stewart lied and obstructed justice on other grounds, including her claim that she was reminded of the prior $60 agreement and urged to sell on that basis.


Following Stewart's conviction, a message was posted on her website, reading, in part, "I am obviously distressed by the jury's verdict but I continue to take comfort in knowing that I have the confidence and enduring support of my family and friends. I will appeal the verdict and continue to fight to clear my name. I believe in the fairness of the judicial system and remain confident that I will ultimately prevail." Following the jury verdict, a message was posted on her website, reading, in part: {{cquote|I am obviously distressed by the jury's verdict but I continue to take comfort in knowing that I have the confidence and enduring support of my family and friends. I will appeal the verdict and continue to fight to clear my name. I believe in the fairness of the judicial system and remain confident that I will ultimately prevail.}}


===Sentencing=== ===Sentencing===
⚫ On July 8, a motion for a new trial was denied and sentencing was set for July 16. Stewart and Bacanovic were each sentenced to five months in prison, five months of home confinement, and two years' probation for lying about a stock sale, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. Stewart was ordered to pay a $30,000 fine, while Bacanovic was fined $4,000. The judge stayed the sentence while they prepared their appeals.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5444565 |title=Stewart receives 5-month prison term – Corporate scandals |access-date=2007-12-25 |work=NBC News|date=15 July 2004 }}</ref>
{{Refimprove|section|date=January 2010}}
<!-- Commented out because image was deleted: ] -->
⚫ On July 8, a motion for a new trial was denied and sentencing was set for July 16. Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic were each sentenced to five months in prison, five months of home confinement, and two years probation for lying about a stock sale, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. Stewart was ordered to pay a $30,000 fine, while Bacanovic was fined $4,000. The judge stayed the sentence while they prepared their appeals.<ref name="titleStewart receives 5-month prison term - Corporate scandals - MSNBC.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5444565 |title=Stewart receives 5-month prison term - Corporate scandals - MSNBC.com |accessdate=2007-12-25 |format= |work=}}</ref>


On September 15, 2004, accompanied by her lawyers and members of the board of directors of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Stewart held a press conference to announce her decision to begin serving her sentence as soon as possible while vowing to continue ahead with her appeal.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/services/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720topnews.html|title=Dan Ackman, "Martha and the Mandelas"|publisher=Forbes.com, July 20, 2004}}</ref> The event was featured live on national television. On September 21, she was ordered by US District Judge Miriam Cedarbaum to surrender by October 8 to begin her sentence. On September 29, the ] announced that Stewart would serve her sentence at the ] near ], denying her request to serve it at the ] in ]. She reported to ] early in the morning on October 8. Alderson is a minimum security prison, the lowest level of security in the Bureau of Prisons. There are no fences, and inmates are generally free to walk around the compound unescorted. Stewart, who said her prison nickname was "M. Diddy",<ref name="title'M. Diddy' Stewart's Prison Tales, Martha Calls House Arrest 'Hideous'; Says She Can Remove Monitor - CBS News">{{cite news |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/05/entertainment/main706388.shtml |title='M. Diddy' Stewart's Prison Tales, Martha Calls House Arrest 'Hideous'; Says She Can Remove Monitor - CBS News |accessdate=2007-12-26 |work= | date=July 5, 2005}}</ref> reportedly got along quite well with her fellow inmates and kept herself busy with assigned cleaning tasks. She was released on March 4, 2005 at 12:30 AM. On September 15, 2004, accompanied by her lawyers and members of the board of directors of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Stewart held a press conference to announce her decision to begin serving her sentence as soon as possible while vowing to continue ahead with her appeal.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/services/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720topnews.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040722004102/http://www.forbes.com/services/2004/07/20/cx_da_0720topnews.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 22, 2004|title=Martha and the Mandelas|publisher=Forbes.com, July 20, 2004 | date=July 20, 2004}}</ref> The event was featured live on national television. On September 21, Judge Miriam Cedarbaum ordered her to surrender by October 8. On September 29, the ] announced that Stewart would serve her sentence at the ] near ], denying her request to serve it at the ] in ].<ref name=beau>"Martha's new digs; Judge assigns Stewart to minimum security facility in West Virginia" (September 30, 2004) '']'', Beaumont, Texas.</ref><ref>"Welcome to 'Camp Cupcake'; Alderson Residents Ready for Latest Celebrity Inmate" (October 4, 2004) ''Hartford Courant'', Hartford, Connecticut.</ref> She reported to Alderson Federal Prison Camp early in the morning on October 8.<ref>"Martha Stewart reports to prison, Entrepreneur arrived at Alderson at 6:15 a.m., says she wants to get 'nightmare' behind her" (October 8, 2004) ''Charleston Daily Mail'', Charleston, West Virginia.</ref> Alderson is a minimum security prison, the lowest level of security in the Bureau of Prisons.<ref name=beau/> There are no fences, and inmates are generally free to walk around the compound unescorted. Stewart, who said her prison nickname was "M. Diddy",<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/05/entertainment/main706388.shtml |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050707020950/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/05/entertainment/main706388.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 7, 2005 |title='M. Diddy' Stewart's Prison Tales, Martha Calls House Arrest 'Hideous'; Says She Can Remove Monitor |access-date=2007-12-26 |work=CBS News| date=July 5, 2005}}</ref> reportedly got along quite well with her fellow inmates and kept herself busy with assigned cleaning tasks. She was released on March 4, 2005.<ref>"Martha and the pros of being a con; They say that crime doesn't pay. But during the five months that America's domestic goddess has spent in prison for insider dealing, the value of her company has tripled. David Usborne reports on a very lucrative rehabilitation" (March 4, 2005) ''Belfast Telegraph'', Belfast.</ref><ref>"Town Gets Ready for Stewart's Departure" (March 4, 2005) ''The Augusta Chronicle'', Augusta, Georgia.</ref><ref>"Martha Stewart Living: No Bars; While Doyenne Serves Sentence, Stock Surges On Hopes for New Projects" (March 4, 2005) ''Asian Wall Street Journal'', Victoria, Hong Kong.</ref><ref>"Coming home to 'a good thing' " (March 4, 2005) ''The Atlanta Journal–Constitution'', Atlanta, Georgia.</ref>


After being released from Alderson, Stewart began to serve her home confinement at her estate in ]. During the confinement she was permitted to leave her property for up to 48 hours a week to conduct business, but was required to wear an electronic ] to monitor her location at all times. On January 6, 2006, a Federal Appeals court denied Stewart's appeal and upheld the jury's verdict. After being released from Alderson, Stewart began her home confinement at her estate in ]. During the confinement, she was permitted to leave her property for up to 48 hours a week to conduct business, but was required to wear an electronic ] to monitor her location at all times. On January 6, 2006, a Federal Appeals court denied Stewart's appeal and upheld the jury's verdict.<ref>{{cite court |litigants=United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic |vol=433 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=273 |court=] |date=2006-01-06 |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/433/273/546171/ |access-date= |quote= |postscript= }}</ref><ref>"Martha Stewart loses appeal of conviction" (January 6, 2006) UPI NewsTrack, Washington.</ref>


==Repercussions and aftermath== ==Repercussions and aftermath==


On March 8, 2004, ] pulled '']'' from its ] and ] affiliates, after having moved the show during Stewart's trial from prime daytime timeslots into less desirable early-morning slots (e.g., 2:05am in New York); the show was distributed by another Viacom division, ].{{Citation needed|date=December 2007}} On March 15, Stewart resigned from the board of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Stewart had already resigned from the boards of ] and ]. On May 18, MSO announced that ''Martha Stewart Living'', was going into hiatus, with no announced date of return.{{Citation needed|date=December 2007}} On March 8, 2004, ] pulled '']'' from its ] and ] affiliates, after having moved the show during Stewart's trial from prime daytime timeslots into less desirable early-morning slots (e.g., 2:05{{nbsp}}am in New York); the show was distributed by another Viacom division, ].<ref>"TV SHOW: Viacom stations drop 'Martha Stewart Living' " (March 9, 2004) ''Chicago Tribune'', Chicago, Illinois.</ref> On March 15, Stewart resigned from the board of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Stewart had already resigned from the boards of ] and ].<ref>"Martha Stewart Resigns from Board of NY Stock Exchange" (October 4, 2002) ''St. Louis Post–Dispatch'', St. Louis, Missouri.</ref><ref>"Omnimedia shares continue descent: Stewart resigns from Revlon board" (March 9, 2004) ''The Gazette'', Montreal, Quebec.</ref> On May 18, MSO announced that ''Martha Stewart Living'', was going into hiatus, with no announced date of return.<ref>"Plug pulled on Martha TV" (May 19, 2004) '' National Post'', Don Mills, Ontario.</ref>


On May 21, 2004 , Larry Stewart (no relation), a ] lab director who testified for the government against Martha Stewart, was charged with two counts of ]. Stock in ] jumped as much as 23 percent on the news. Larry Stewart was an expert witness about the ink on a broker's worksheet, testifying that the note about selling ImClone shares when it dropped below $60 was different from the rest of the ink on the document. The charges arose when Susan Fortunato, a Secret Service co-worker, complained that she had in fact done the analysis and that it had never been examined by Stewart. Although the jury at the perjury trial felt that Larry Stewart had taken unfair credit for the work done, it did not amount to perjury and he was found not guilty on October 5, 2004. The jury had trouble believing Fortunato, feeling that she had an axe to grind with Stewart. {{Citation needed|date=December 2007}} On May 21, 2004, Larry Stewart (no relation), a ] lab director who testified for the government against Martha Stewart, was charged with two counts of ]. Stock in ] jumped as much as 23 percent on the news. Larry Stewart was an expert witness about the ink on a broker's worksheet, testifying that the note about selling ImClone shares when it dropped below $60 was different from the rest of the ink on the document. The charges arose when Susan Fortunato, a Secret Service co-worker, complained that she had in fact done the analysis and that it had never been examined by Stewart. Although the jury at the perjury trial felt that Larry Stewart had taken unfair credit for the work done, it did not amount to perjury and he was found not guilty on October 5, 2004. The jury had trouble believing Fortunato, feeling that she had an axe to grind with Stewart.<ref>{{cite news|author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Grudge Alleged in Ink Expert's Perjury Case |date=2004-09-24 |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-sep-24-fi-stewart24-story.html |agency=Associated Press}}</ref>


In October, 2005, Stewart was informed that due to her status as a ] in the United States, she was inadmissible for entry into Canada under the ]. Stewart had planned to attend the ] in ]. Within two days of the story's breaking, then Canadian ] ] granted Stewart a temporary resident permit, thereby allowing her to temporarily enter Canada.<ref>CTV.ca: , October 7, 2005</ref> However, bad weather prevented her from attending.<ref>CTV.ca: , October 9, 2005</ref> In October 2005, Stewart was informed that due to her status as a ] in the United States, she was inadmissible for entry into Canada under the ]. Stewart had planned to attend the ] in ]. Within two days of the story's breaking, then Canadian ] ] granted Stewart a temporary resident permit, thereby allowing her to temporarily enter Canada.<ref>CTV.ca: {{dead link|date=July 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, October 7, 2005.</ref> Bad weather prevented her from attending, however.<ref>CTV.ca: {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060109032817/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20051009/martha_nova_scotia_051009/20051009?hub=Entertainment |date=2006-01-09 }}, October 9, 2005</ref>


In June, 2008, the ], operational since 1 April 2008 with new rules to safeguard British borders, refused to grant her a visa to enter ], because of her criminal conviction for obstructing justice. She had been planning to speak at the ] on fashion and leisure industry matters.<ref></ref> In June 2008, the ], operational since April 1, 2008, with new rules to safeguard British borders, refused to grant her a visa to enter the ], because of her criminal conviction for obstructing justice. She had been planning to speak at the ] on fashion and ] matters.<ref></ref>


In August, 2006, the ] announced that it had agreed to settle the related civil case against Stewart. Under the settlement, Stewart agreed to a five-year bar from serving as a director, or as the CEO, CFO (or other officer roles in which she would be responsible for preparing, auditing, or disclosing financial results), of any public company. In August 2006, the ] announced that it had agreed to settle the related civil case against Stewart. Under the settlement, Stewart agreed to a five-year bar from serving as a director, or as the CEO, CFO (or other officer roles in which she would be responsible for preparing, auditing, or disclosing financial results), of any public company.
She also agreed to pay the maximum penalty of three times the losses she avoided, or $195,000. Bacanovic agreed to pay penalties totaling about $75,000, and was barred associating with a broker, dealer or investment adviser.<ref name="titleMartha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic: Lit. Rel. No. 19794 / August 7, 2006">{{cite web |url=http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2006/lr19794.htm |title=Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic: Lit. Rel. No. 19794 / August 7, 2006 |accessdate=2007-12-25 |work=}}</ref><ref></ref> She also agreed to pay the maximum penalty of three times the losses she avoided, or $195,000. Bacanovic agreed to pay penalties totaling about $75,000, and was barred associating with a broker, dealer or investment adviser.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2006/lr19794.htm |title=Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic: Lit. Rel. No. 19794 / August 7, 2006 |access-date=2007-12-25 }}</ref><ref>, Securities and Exchange Commission press release, August 7, 2006.</ref>


===TV movies=== ===TV movies===
Line 74: Line 70:


==External links== ==External links==
* * – ''New York Times'', June 4, 2003
⚫ * ] –
*
* &mdash; ''Washington Post'', June 4, 2003 * ] –
⚫ *] -
*] -


]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Imclone Stock Trading Case}}
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 18:51, 29 August 2024

SEC probe of Martha Stewart

A U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Attorney probe into trading in the shares of ImClone Systems resulted in a widely publicized criminal case, which resulted in prison terms for businesswoman and television personality Martha Stewart, ImClone CEO Samuel D. Waksal, and Stewart's broker at Merrill Lynch, Peter Bacanovic.

History

ImClone's stock price dropped sharply at the end of 2001 when its drug Erbitux, an experimental monoclonal antibody, failed to get the expected Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. It was later revealed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that prior to the announcement (after the close of trading on December 28) of the FDA's decision, numerous executives sold their stock. ImClone's founder, Samuel D. Waksal, was arrested in 2002 on insider trading charges for instructing friends and family to sell their stock, and attempting to sell his own. His daughter, Aliza Waksal, sold $2.5 million in shares on December 27. His father, Jack Waksal, sold $8.1 million in shares over the 27th and 28th; company executives followed suit. John B. Landes, the general counsel, sold $2.5 million in shares on December 6. Ronald A. Martell, the vice president for marketing and sales, sold $2.1 million in shares on December 11. Four other executives sold shares in the following weeks as well. Later, founder Waksal pleaded guilty to various charges, including securities fraud, and on June 10, 2003, was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison.

Martha Stewart, the founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, also became embroiled in the scandal after it emerged that her broker, Peter Bacanovic, tipped her off that ImClone was about to drop. In response, Stewart sold about $230,000 in ImClone shares on December 27, 2001, a day before the announcement of the FDA decision. Stewart's involvement would have never come to light had Doug Faneuil, Bacanovic's assistant, not disclosed it to investigators. Although Stewart maintained her innocence, she was found guilty and sentenced on July 16, 2004, to five months in prison, five months of home confinement, and two years' probation for lying about a stock sale, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice.

Ultimately a new clinical trial and FDA filing prepared by ImClone's partner Merck KGaA ("German Merck" not to be confused with the U.S. company of similar name) resulted in an FDA approval of Erbitux in 2004 for use in colon cancer.

A Congressional hearing on improprieties at ImClone, held in October 2002, unveiled a culture of corruption dating back to 1986. This was the year that ImClone CEO Waksal first forged the signature of the company's general counsel John Landes (one of the three original employees of the company) for financial gain. Nonetheless, Landes defended Waksal's illegal actions at the hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, portraying the forgery as "a good-faith misunderstanding". The subcommittee's chairman, Jim Greenwood of Pennsylvania, replied, "My children know better than that, Mr. Landes." Further questioning about this and subsequent forgeries on Waksal's part revealed that neither Landes, the chief legal officer of the company, nor the company's outside directors reported Waksal's actions to proper authorities or made any moves to have Waksal removed as CEO. Instead, testimony revealed that they initiated their own internal investigation, which was never concluded.

The FDA's February 2004 announcement of approval for use of Erbitux for treatment of colorectal cancer reported that conclusions were drawn from a trial involving 329 patients, of which 10.8% responded when Erbitux was used by itself, delaying tumor growth by 1.5 months. When used in conjunction with a standard treatment irinotecan, 22.9% of patients responded and tumor growth was delayed by approximately 4.1 months.

In September 2001, Bristol Myers Squibb committed $2 billion (including a $1 billion up-front cash payment) for less than 20% of ImClone due to what was called at the time the drug's "blockbuster" potential.

In January 2006, the company was put up for sale but failed to find any buyers, likely because Erbitux by that time faced significant competition in the medical marketplace. ImClone directors withdrew the sale of the company in mid-2006.

In April 2009, Eli Lilly and Company purchased ImClone Systems Inc. for an estimated $6.8 billion.

Indictment and SEC charges

Waksal was arrested June 12, 2002, on charges of conspiring to commit insider trading. On October 15, he pleaded guilty to charges of securities fraud, bank fraud, obstruction of justice, and perjury.

On March 3, 2003, he pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy and wire fraud for avoiding $1.2 million in sales taxes on $15 million in artwork. The art included works by Mark Rothko, Richard Serra, Roy Lichtenstein, and Willem de Kooning, purchased between June 2000 and October 2001. He did not pay the necessary taxes at the time of purchase, but paid in fall 2002.

On June 10, 2003, Waksal was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison and ordered to pay more than $4 million in fines and back taxes, all the maximum punishments allowable under law. Waksal was released in 2009.

On June 4, 2003, a federal grand jury in Manhattan indicted Stewart and her former broker, Peter Bacanovic, on nine criminal counts. The government alleged that, by selling when she did, Stewart avoided losses of $45,673. The charges included securities fraud, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy. Stewart pleaded not guilty, saying she had a standing order with Bacanovic to sell her shares if ImClone stock fell below $60. Stewart resigned as CEO and chairman of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia on the same day she was indicted, but remained on the company's board.

The day after her indictment, Stewart took out a full-page advertisement in USA Today and launched a website with an open letter of defense "to my friends and loyal supporters." She said, "I want you to know that I am innocent—and that I will fight to clear my name... The government's attempt to criminalize these actions makes no sense to me... I am confident I will be exonerated of these baseless charges."

On the day she was indicted, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil complaint against Stewart with charges of insider trading (for violating § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and SEC Rule 10b-5). The civil charges were stayed pending the criminal proceeding.

Trial

Stewart's trial was initially set for January 12, 2004, at the request of her lawyers who said they needed more time to analyze the evidence. The trial eventually began on January 20 in New York City presided over by U.S. District Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum. During the trial, Stewart maintained her innocence.

On February 27, 2004, Judge Cederbaum dismissed the charge of securities fraud, which could have led to up to ten years in prison and a $1 million fine. The judge found that "no reasonable juror can find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant lied for the purpose of influencing the market for the securities of her own company."

Verdict

The jury deliberated for three days following the five-week trial. On March 5, 2004, Stewart was found guilty by the jury of eight women and four men on all four remaining counts: conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statements to a federal investigator. She was found not guilty of one of the most publicized charges: having falsely claimed that there was an agreement to sell her shares when they fell to $60. The jury found that Stewart lied and obstructed justice on other grounds, including her claim that she was reminded of the prior $60 agreement and urged to sell on that basis.

Following the jury verdict, a message was posted on her website, reading, in part:

I am obviously distressed by the jury's verdict but I continue to take comfort in knowing that I have the confidence and enduring support of my family and friends. I will appeal the verdict and continue to fight to clear my name. I believe in the fairness of the judicial system and remain confident that I will ultimately prevail.

Sentencing

On July 8, a motion for a new trial was denied and sentencing was set for July 16. Stewart and Bacanovic were each sentenced to five months in prison, five months of home confinement, and two years' probation for lying about a stock sale, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. Stewart was ordered to pay a $30,000 fine, while Bacanovic was fined $4,000. The judge stayed the sentence while they prepared their appeals.

On September 15, 2004, accompanied by her lawyers and members of the board of directors of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Stewart held a press conference to announce her decision to begin serving her sentence as soon as possible while vowing to continue ahead with her appeal. The event was featured live on national television. On September 21, Judge Miriam Cedarbaum ordered her to surrender by October 8. On September 29, the Federal Bureau of Prisons announced that Stewart would serve her sentence at the federal prison camp near Alderson, West Virginia, denying her request to serve it at the federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut. She reported to Alderson Federal Prison Camp early in the morning on October 8. Alderson is a minimum security prison, the lowest level of security in the Bureau of Prisons. There are no fences, and inmates are generally free to walk around the compound unescorted. Stewart, who said her prison nickname was "M. Diddy", reportedly got along quite well with her fellow inmates and kept herself busy with assigned cleaning tasks. She was released on March 4, 2005.

After being released from Alderson, Stewart began her home confinement at her estate in Bedford, New York. During the confinement, she was permitted to leave her property for up to 48 hours a week to conduct business, but was required to wear an electronic ankle monitor to monitor her location at all times. On January 6, 2006, a Federal Appeals court denied Stewart's appeal and upheld the jury's verdict.

Repercussions and aftermath

On March 8, 2004, Viacom pulled Martha Stewart Living from its CBS and UPN affiliates, after having moved the show during Stewart's trial from prime daytime timeslots into less desirable early-morning slots (e.g., 2:05 am in New York); the show was distributed by another Viacom division, King World Productions. On March 15, Stewart resigned from the board of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Stewart had already resigned from the boards of The New York Stock Exchange and Revlon Cosmetics. On May 18, MSO announced that Martha Stewart Living, was going into hiatus, with no announced date of return.

On May 21, 2004, Larry Stewart (no relation), a United States Secret Service lab director who testified for the government against Martha Stewart, was charged with two counts of perjury. Stock in Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia jumped as much as 23 percent on the news. Larry Stewart was an expert witness about the ink on a broker's worksheet, testifying that the note about selling ImClone shares when it dropped below $60 was different from the rest of the ink on the document. The charges arose when Susan Fortunato, a Secret Service co-worker, complained that she had in fact done the analysis and that it had never been examined by Stewart. Although the jury at the perjury trial felt that Larry Stewart had taken unfair credit for the work done, it did not amount to perjury and he was found not guilty on October 5, 2004. The jury had trouble believing Fortunato, feeling that she had an axe to grind with Stewart.

In October 2005, Stewart was informed that due to her status as a convicted felon in the United States, she was inadmissible for entry into Canada under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Stewart had planned to attend the Windsor Pumpkin Regatta in Nova Scotia. Within two days of the story's breaking, then Canadian Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Joe Volpe granted Stewart a temporary resident permit, thereby allowing her to temporarily enter Canada. Bad weather prevented her from attending, however.

In June 2008, the UK Border Agency, operational since April 1, 2008, with new rules to safeguard British borders, refused to grant her a visa to enter the United Kingdom, because of her criminal conviction for obstructing justice. She had been planning to speak at the Royal Academy on fashion and leisure industry matters.

In August 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it had agreed to settle the related civil case against Stewart. Under the settlement, Stewart agreed to a five-year bar from serving as a director, or as the CEO, CFO (or other officer roles in which she would be responsible for preparing, auditing, or disclosing financial results), of any public company. She also agreed to pay the maximum penalty of three times the losses she avoided, or $195,000. Bacanovic agreed to pay penalties totaling about $75,000, and was barred associating with a broker, dealer or investment adviser.

TV movies

Martha: Behind Bars, based on her time in prison, starred Cybill Shepherd as Stewart and was aired by CBS in September 2005. A previous movie, Martha, Inc.: The Story of Martha Stewart, also starring Shepherd, had been aired by NBC in 2003.

References

  1. ^ Stewart, James (2011). Tangled Webs: How False Statements are Undermining America: From Martha Stewart to Bernie Madoff. New York City: Penguin Press. ISBN 9781594202698.
  2. Martha Stewart, Broker, Indicted, CNN, June 4, 2004.
  3. SEC.gov
  4. SEC.gov
  5. Jurist.law.pitt.edu
  6. United States v. Stewart (Stewart I), 305 F. Supp. 2d 368, 378 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).
  7. "Stewart Asks to Start Prison Sentence; She says she wants to put this behind her so she can move on with her life and career", Los Angeles Times, September 16, 2004.
  8. "Judge Tosses Fraud Charge Against Stewart," Archived 2009-02-28 at the Wayback Machine TheStreet.com, February 27, 2004.
  9. "Stewart found guilty on all counts in obstruction trial". CNN. March 5, 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-25.
  10. "Stewart receives 5-month prison term – Corporate scandals". NBC News. 15 July 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-25.
  11. "Martha and the Mandelas". Forbes.com, July 20, 2004. July 20, 2004. Archived from the original on July 22, 2004.
  12. ^ "Martha's new digs; Judge assigns Stewart to minimum security facility in West Virginia" (September 30, 2004) Beaumont Enterprise, Beaumont, Texas.
  13. "Welcome to 'Camp Cupcake'; Alderson Residents Ready for Latest Celebrity Inmate" (October 4, 2004) Hartford Courant, Hartford, Connecticut.
  14. "Martha Stewart reports to prison, Entrepreneur arrived at Alderson at 6:15 a.m., says she wants to get 'nightmare' behind her" (October 8, 2004) Charleston Daily Mail, Charleston, West Virginia.
  15. "'M. Diddy' Stewart's Prison Tales, Martha Calls House Arrest 'Hideous'; Says She Can Remove Monitor". CBS News. July 5, 2005. Archived from the original on July 7, 2005. Retrieved 2007-12-26.
  16. "Martha and the pros of being a con; They say that crime doesn't pay. But during the five months that America's domestic goddess has spent in prison for insider dealing, the value of her company has tripled. David Usborne reports on a very lucrative rehabilitation" (March 4, 2005) Belfast Telegraph, Belfast.
  17. "Town Gets Ready for Stewart's Departure" (March 4, 2005) The Augusta Chronicle, Augusta, Georgia.
  18. "Martha Stewart Living: No Bars; While Doyenne Serves Sentence, Stock Surges On Hopes for New Projects" (March 4, 2005) Asian Wall Street Journal, Victoria, Hong Kong.
  19. "Coming home to 'a good thing' " (March 4, 2005) The Atlanta Journal–Constitution, Atlanta, Georgia.
  20. United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic, 433 F.3d 273 (2d Cir. 2006-01-06).
  21. "Martha Stewart loses appeal of conviction" (January 6, 2006) UPI NewsTrack, Washington.
  22. "TV SHOW: Viacom stations drop 'Martha Stewart Living' " (March 9, 2004) Chicago Tribune, Chicago, Illinois.
  23. "Martha Stewart Resigns from Board of NY Stock Exchange" (October 4, 2002) St. Louis Post–Dispatch, St. Louis, Missouri.
  24. "Omnimedia shares continue descent: Stewart resigns from Revlon board" (March 9, 2004) The Gazette, Montreal, Quebec.
  25. "Plug pulled on Martha TV" (May 19, 2004) National Post, Don Mills, Ontario.
  26. "Grudge Alleged in Ink Expert's Perjury Case". Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. 2004-09-24.
  27. CTV.ca: Way cleared for Stewart to attend N.S. festival, October 7, 2005.
  28. CTV.ca: Martha cancels visit to N.S. pumpkin regatta Archived 2006-01-09 at the Wayback Machine, October 9, 2005
  29. Daily Telegraph issue dated June 20, 2008, and reported by CNN
  30. "Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic: Lit. Rel. No. 19794 / August 7, 2006". Retrieved 2007-12-25.
  31. "Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic Settle SEC's Insider Trading Charges", Securities and Exchange Commission press release, August 7, 2006.

External links

Categories: