Revision as of 20:28, 21 January 2011 editKenilworth Terrace (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers6,715 edits →COI concerns: No.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:45, 8 February 2011 edit undoKenilworth Terrace (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers6,715 editsm moved User talk:Kenilworth Terrace to User talk:Kenilworth Terrace/Archive 2: Archiving | ||
(18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box|]}} | |||
==Wack Pack== | ==Wack Pack== | ||
I disagree with the redirect and have reverted the article to the version previous to the redirect. If you want to delete the article, I'd ask you please put it up on afd. I'd be happy to discuss it further when you resume editing. Thanks. ] (]) 01:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | I disagree with the redirect and have reverted the article to the version previous to the redirect. If you want to delete the article, I'd ask you please put it up on afd. I'd be happy to discuss it further when you resume editing. Thanks. ] (]) 01:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I will put it up for AFD in due course. ] (]) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC) | :I will put it up for AFD in due course. ] (]) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Done now. ] (]) 17:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
== I'm glad to see you're getting appropriate support at ANI == | |||
Having learnt plenty of psychobabble when I was mental health social worker, I can't help suspecting that you are an unfortunate victim of ].--] (]) 16:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks! Since I have never knowingly interacted with her before, I think it's a case of ]. ] (]) 17:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Eh?== | |||
Used to use ] but got compromised. --] (]) 18:15, 4 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Ah, I see. I thought it unlikely that a new user would appear at ] on their first day. ] (]) 18:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== "Im sure you know what that means" == | |||
Is Viriditas saying that we are the same person, or meat-puppeting or something? He floated that sort of idea before, that he knew who I was, though I haven't edited with him before. I'm not sure what his game is here, but I'm growing tired with trying to figure him out. He argues one thing and does another. Please let me know if you file a report; I'd like the opportunity to address my own problems with the user. - ] (]) 20:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:I assume he is trying to imply something along those lines, but does not care to say so . Anyway, see ] ] (]) 20:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
::I must have missed the Diff where he said that. Could you post it here? - ] (]) 23:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::The diff above shows him not answering it. ] (]) 07:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
::::Sorry, I meant the post wherein he noted a "unusually close association" - the one which prompted your initial post to his page. - ] (]) 16:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::::Oh, I see! That would be ] (]) 17:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Re; Viriditas == | |||
I've initiated a Wikiquette Alert (WQA) regarding Viriditas' editing behavior, and you have been noted in the alert as well. That alert can be found ]. I wanted to advise you of its existence, so you could act according to your wishes. - ] (]) 17:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:I have commented, but frankly as far as I'm personally concerned it's the sort of low-level incivility that one just has to shrug off. As part of a pattern it would be of concern. ] (]) 18:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
::That's kind of the point, KT; even if it weren't a pattern of misbehavior (and his dismissal and marginalization of your views are apparently only the most recent), or if I weren't subjected to the repeated snide remarks, I could simply shrug it off. But the guy (or gal) follows my edits wherever I post. This effectively poisons the well in any discussion, creating an inhospitable environment for me to edit in. WQA is a step in DR, one which I am obliged to seek resolution with Viriditas. Whether he reacts positively to the attempt or not will determine how far up the DR chain this goes. - ] (]) 18:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::As I say, that's more worrying. ] (]) 18:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:45, 8 February 2011
Wack Pack
I disagree with the redirect and have reverted the article to the version previous to the redirect. If you want to delete the article, I'd ask you please put it up on afd. I'd be happy to discuss it further when you resume editing. Thanks. CarbonX (talk) 01:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I will put it up for AFD in due course. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Done now. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I'm glad to see you're getting appropriate support at ANI
Having learnt plenty of psychobabble when I was mental health social worker, I can't help suspecting that you are an unfortunate victim of Projection (psychology).--Peter cohen (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Since I have never knowingly interacted with her before, I think it's a case of No good deed goes unpunished. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Eh?
Used to use User:Perseus, Son of Zeus but got compromised. --Perseus8235 (talk) 18:15, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. I thought it unlikely that a new user would appear at Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard on their first day. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
"Im sure you know what that means"
Is Viriditas saying that we are the same person, or meat-puppeting or something? He floated that sort of idea before, that he knew who I was, though I haven't edited with him before. I'm not sure what his game is here, but I'm growing tired with trying to figure him out. He argues one thing and does another. Please let me know if you file a report; I'd like the opportunity to address my own problems with the user. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I assume he is trying to imply something along those lines, but does not care to say so . Anyway, see Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruption_at_Wikipedia:Fringe_theories.2FNoticeboard Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I must have missed the Diff where he said that. Could you post it here? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- The diff above shows him not answering it. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 07:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant the post wherein he noted a "unusually close association" - the one which prompted your initial post to his page. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I see! That would be here Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant the post wherein he noted a "unusually close association" - the one which prompted your initial post to his page. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- The diff above shows him not answering it. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 07:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I must have missed the Diff where he said that. Could you post it here? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Re; Viriditas
I've initiated a Wikiquette Alert (WQA) regarding Viriditas' editing behavior, and you have been noted in the alert as well. That alert can be found here. I wanted to advise you of its existence, so you could act according to your wishes. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- I have commented, but frankly as far as I'm personally concerned it's the sort of low-level incivility that one just has to shrug off. As part of a pattern it would be of concern. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's kind of the point, KT; even if it weren't a pattern of misbehavior (and his dismissal and marginalization of your views are apparently only the most recent), or if I weren't subjected to the repeated snide remarks, I could simply shrug it off. But the guy (or gal) follows my edits wherever I post. This effectively poisons the well in any discussion, creating an inhospitable environment for me to edit in. WQA is a step in DR, one which I am obliged to seek resolution with Viriditas. Whether he reacts positively to the attempt or not will determine how far up the DR chain this goes. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- As I say, that's more worrying. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's kind of the point, KT; even if it weren't a pattern of misbehavior (and his dismissal and marginalization of your views are apparently only the most recent), or if I weren't subjected to the repeated snide remarks, I could simply shrug it off. But the guy (or gal) follows my edits wherever I post. This effectively poisons the well in any discussion, creating an inhospitable environment for me to edit in. WQA is a step in DR, one which I am obliged to seek resolution with Viriditas. Whether he reacts positively to the attempt or not will determine how far up the DR chain this goes. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)