Misplaced Pages

Aharon Barak: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:08, 21 January 2011 editMnnlaxer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,697 edits Published works← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 December 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,818 edits Reformat 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20 
(189 intermediate revisions by 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Former President of the Supreme Court of Israel}}
{{Infobox Judge

|honorific-prefix =
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}}
|name = Aharon Barak
{{Infobox officeholder
|honorific-suffix =
| honorific-prefix =
|image = Aharon Barak.jpg
| name = Aharon Barak
|imagesize = 180px
|caption = | honorific-suffix =
| native_name = {{No bold|{{Script/Hebrew|אהרן ברק}}}}
|office = President of the ]
| image = Aharon barak 01.jpg
|term_start = 13 August 1995
| imagesize = 220px
|term_end = 14 September 2006
|appointer = | caption =
| office = President of the ]
|predecessor = ]
| term_start = 13 August 1995
|successor = ]
| term_end = 14 September 2006
|birth_date = {{birth date|1936|9|16|df=y}}
| predecessor = ]
|birth_place = ], ]
| successor = ]
|death_date =
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1936|9|16|df=y}}
|death_place =
| birth_place = ], Lithuania
|nationality = Israel
|party = | death_date =
|spouse = | death_place =
|children = | nationality = Israeli
| spouse = {{marriage|]|1957|2024|end=her death}}
|alma_mater = ]
| children = 4
|occupation =
| alma_mater = ]
|religion =
|signature = | occupation =
| religion =
| parents = Zvi Brick, Leah Brick
| signature = Aharon_Barak_Signature_from_the_Goldman_Collection.png
}} }}


'''Aharon Barak''' ({{lang-he| אהרן ברק}}, born September 16, 1936) is a professor of law at the ] in ] and a lecturer in law at the ], the ] and the ]. Aharon Barak was President of the ] from 1995 to 2006.<ref></ref> Prior to that he served as a judge on the Supreme Court (1978–1995), as the ] (1975–1978) and as the ] of the Law Faculty of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Legal scholars{{who|date=November 2010}} have called him the "]" of Israel, the "world's greatest living jurist."<ref></ref> '''Aharon Barak''' ({{langx|he|אהרן ברק}}; born 16 September 1936) is an Israeli lawyer and jurist who served as President of the ] from 1995 to 2006. Prior to this, Barak served as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel from 1978 to 1995, and before this as ] from 1975 to 1978.


Barak was born with the name of Erik Brick in ], Lithuania in 1936. Having survived the Holocaust, he and his family later immigrated to ] in 1947. He studied law, ] and economics at the ], and obtained his ] in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, he was drafted into the ].
==Biography==
===Early life and family===
Aharon Barak (Brick) was born in ], ], the only son of Zvi Brick, an attorney, and his wife Leah, a teacher. After the Nazi occupation of the city in 1941, the family spent three years in the ].<ref name="encyclopedia.jrank.org">{{cite web|url=http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/articles/pages/5561/Barak-Aharon-1936.html |title=Barak, Aharon (1936–) – PERSONAL HISTORY, BIOGRAPHICAL HIGHLIGHTS, PERSONAL CHRONOLOGY:, INFLUENCES AND CONTRIBUTIONS, EXPLORING, Influence on the Israeli Legal System |publisher=Encyclopedia.jrank.org |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref> He was smuggled out in a sack at the age of five.<ref>]</ref> At the end of the war, after wandering through Hungary, Austria, and Italy, Barak and his parents reached Rome, where they spent the next two years. In 1947, they received travel papers and immigrated to Palestine.<ref name="encyclopedia.jrank.org"/> After a brief period on a ], the family settled in ]'s ] neighborhood.


From 1974 to 1975, Barak was dean of the law faculty of the ].<ref>
He studied law, ] and ] at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and obtained his ] in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, having been drafted into the ], he served in the office of the ]. Upon discharging his service he returned to the Hebrew University, where he completed his doctoral ] with distinction in 1963. Simultaneously he began work as an ] at the Attorney General's office. When the Attorney General began dealing with the trial of ], Barak, being a holocaust survivor, preferred not to be involved in the work. He was transferred to the ]'s office to complete his internship at his request. Upon completing his internship he was recognised as a certified ].
{{cite web|title=Aharon Barak – President of the Supreme Court|url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/1990_1999/1998/6/Aharon+Barak+-+President+of+the+Supreme+Court.htm|access-date=21 January 2010|publisher=Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs}}</ref> Barak is currently a law professor at ] in ], and has taught at institutions including ], ], ], and the ].


== Biography ==
Barak is married to Elisheva Ososkin, former vice president of the National Labor Court, with whom he has three daughters and a son, all trained in the law.<ref name="encyclopedia.jrank.org"/>
Erik Brick (later Aharon Barak) was born in ], Lithuania, the only son of Zvi Brick, an attorney, and his wife Leah, a teacher. After the Nazi occupation of the city in 1941, the family was in the ]. In an interview with ], Barak told how a Lithuanian farmer saved his life by hiding him under a load of potatoes and smuggling him out of the ghetto, thereby risking his own life if caught.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Avnery |first1=Uri |title=There Are Still Judges… |url=http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1429363587/ |publisher=] |access-date=26 January 2023 |date=18 April 2015}}</ref> At the end of the war, after wandering through Hungary, Austria, and Italy, Barak and his parents reached Rome, where they spent the next two years. In 1947, they received travel papers and ]. After a brief period in a '']'', the family settled in ].{{citation needed|date=August 2022}}


He studied law, ] and economics at the ], and obtained his ] in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, having been drafted into the ], he served in the office of the ]. Upon discharging his service he returned to the Hebrew University, where he completed his doctoral ] with distinction in 1963. Simultaneously he began work as an ] at the Attorney General's office. When the Attorney General began dealing with the trial of ], Barak, being a ], preferred not to be involved in the work. At his request, he was transferred to the ]'s office to complete his internship. Upon completing his internship he was recognised as a certified attorney.
===Academic career===
Between 1966 and 1967 Barak studied at ]. In 1968 he was appointed as a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and in 1974 was named the Dean of its Law Faculty. In 1975, at 38 years of age, he was awarded the ] for legal research. In the same year he became a member of the ]. In 1978 he became a foreign member of the ].


Barak is married to ], former vice president of the ], with whom he has three daughters and a son, all trained in the law.<ref>{{cite web |title=Aharon Barak – Curriculum Vitae|url=https://en.law.huji.ac.il/sites/default/files/lawen/files/cvbarak.pdf |website=Hebrew University of Jerusalem |access-date=13 November 2024}}</ref> Barak's son-in-law Ram Landes made a one-hour documentary film about Barak in 2009 called ''The Judge'' ({{Script/Hebrew|השופט}}), based on an in-depth interview with Barak.
===Attorney General of Israel===
Between 1975 and 1978 Barak served as the Attorney General of Israel. Among his well-known decisions in this capacity were:


== Academic career ==
* The decision to launch a criminal investigation against ], CEO of ] and a nominee for the position of director of the ]. Yadlin was convicted of accepting a bribe and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. During this incident Barak coined the so-called ].
Between 1966 and 1967 Barak studied at ]. In 1968 he was appointed as a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and in 1974 was named the dean of its law faculty. In 1975, at age 38, he was awarded the ] for legal research. In the same year he became a member of the ]. In 1978 he became a foreign member of the ].

After his retirement from the Supreme Court, Barak joined the staff of the ] in Herzliya, and he teaches in the master's degree program for Commercial Law. He also lectures in the ] program. In addition, he continues to lecture at both the ] and the ] in the United States, as well as lecturing as a Distinguished Visitor at the ].
==Judicial career==
=== Attorney General of Israel ===
Between 1975 and 1978, Barak served as the Attorney General of Israel. Among his well-known decisions in this capacity were:

* The decision to launch a criminal investigation against ], CEO of ] and a nominee for the position of director of the ]. Yadlin was convicted of accepting a bribe and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. During this incident Barak coined the so-called ].
* The decision to continue with the police investigation of ] ], despite the Minister's request that the investigation be terminated. Ofer committed suicide in 1977, prior to the conclusion of the investigation. * The decision to continue with the police investigation of ] ], despite the Minister's request that the investigation be terminated. Ofer committed suicide in 1977, prior to the conclusion of the investigation.
* The decision to prosecute ] due to the ]. This decision brought about the resignation of the Israeli Prime Minister ]. In justifying his decision not to prosecute Yitzhak Rabin for the affair, Barak has argued that "Rabin was severely punished in that he was forced to resign from his position. There was no room to punish him further." * The decision to prosecute ] due to the ]. This decision brought about the resignation of the Israeli Prime Minister ]. In justifying his decision not to prosecute Yitzhak Rabin for the affair, Barak has argued that "Rabin was severely punished in that he was forced to resign from his position. There was no room to punish him further."


] with (l-r) ], ], and ], 1978]]
In 1978 Barak was appointed by Israeli Prime Minister ] as the legal advisor to the Israeli delegation for negotiating the ]. In his book '']'', ] praises Barak as a negotiator despite the political disagreements between them.<ref>Carter, James Earl, Jr. ''Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid''. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2006; p. 46</ref>
Barak was appointed by Israeli Prime Minister ] in 1978 as the legal advisor to the Israeli delegation for negotiating the ]. In his book '']'', ] praises Barak as a negotiator despite the political disagreements between them.<ref>
{{cite book
| last = Carter
| first = James Earl
| author-link = Jimmy Carter
| title = Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
| url = https://archive.org/details/palestinepeaceno00cart
| url-access = registration
| publisher = Simon and Schuster
| location = New York
| year = 2006
| page =
| isbn = 978-0-7432-8502-5
}}</ref>


===Judge of the Supreme Court=== === Supreme Court of Israel ===
On 22 September 1978, Barak began his service as a Justice of the ] – the youngest of all of the judges. In 1982–83 he served as a member of the ], a state investigation committee formed to investigate the circumstances surrounding the ]. As part of the committee's conclusions, then Minister of Defense ] was removed from his position. The committee further recommended that he never be appointed to that position again in the future. In 1993, with the retirement of the Deputy President of the Supreme Court ], Barak was appointed the Deputy President. Subsequently, with the retirement of the President ] on 13 August 1995, Barak was appointed the President of the Supreme Court.
On September 22, 1978 he began his service as a Judge on the ] – the youngest of all of the judges.


In the course of his service on the Supreme Court, Barak greatly expanded the range of issues with which the court dealt.<ref>
In 1982–1983 he served as a member of the ], a state investigation committee formed to investigate the circumstances surrounding the ]. As part of the committee's conclusions, then Minister of Defense ] was removed from his position. The committee further recommended that he never be appointed to that position again in the future. In 1993, with the resignation of the Deputy President of the Supreme Court ], Barak was appointed the Deputy President of the court. Subsequently, with the retirement of the President of the court ] on August 13, 1995, Barak was appointed the President of the Supreme Court.
{{Cite journal
| url = http://www.azure.org.il/article.php?id=395
| title = Aharon Barak's Revolution
| last = Neuer
| first = Hillel
| journal = Azure
| year = 1998
| volume = Winter 5758
| issue = 3
| access-date =24 January 2011
}} {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090501154533/https://www.daat.ac.il/DAAT/ezrachut/english/hillel.htm |date=1 May 2009 }}</ref> He canceled the ] test which Israel's Supreme Court had used frequently, and greatly expanded the scope of ] by allowing petitions on a range of matters. Professor Daphna Barak-Erez commented that:"One of the most significant impacts of Judge Barak on Israeli law is found in the change which he led with regard to all matters of justiciability. Judge Barak was the instigator and leader of the outlook which regards the traditional doctrine of justiciability as inappropriately and unnecessarily limiting the matters which the court deals with. Under the leadership of Judge Barak, the Supreme Court significantly increased the fields in which it is ."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hapraklit.co.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/nun1_2.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2009-10-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721135412/http://www.hapraklit.co.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/nun1_2.pdf |archive-date=21 July 2011}}</ref>


Simultaneously, he advanced a number of standards, both for ] (mainly, the standard of the reasonableness of the administrative decision) and in the ] (the standard of ]), while blurring the distinction between the two. Barak's critics have argued that, in doing so, the Supreme Court under his leadership harmed judicial consistency and stability, particularly in the private sector.<ref>
In the course of his service on the Supreme Court Barak greatly expanded the range of issues with which the court dealt.<ref></ref> He canceled the ] test which Israel's Supreme Court had used frequently, and greatly expanded the scope of ] by allowing petitions on a range of matters. Professor ] has commented that:
{{cite web
: "One of the most significant impacts of Judge Barak on Israeli law is found in the change which he led with regard to all matters of justiciability. Judge Barak was the instigator and leader of the outlook which regards the traditional doctrine of justiciability as inappropriately and unnecessarily limiting the matters which the court deals with. Under the leadership of Judge Barak, the Supreme Court significantly increased the fields in which it is ."<ref>http://www.hapraklit.co.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/nun1_2.pdf</ref>
| url = http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070313010225/http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695
| archive-date=13 March 2007| title = השופט כבוחן כליות ולב
| publisher = Makorrishon.co.il
| access-date =22 September 2010
}}</ref>


After 1992, much of his judicial work was focused on advancing and shaping Israel's '']'' (a phrase which he coined), which he believed was brought about by the adoption of ] in the Israeli ] dealing with human rights. According to Barak's approach, which was adopted by the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Revolution brought values such as the Right to Equality, Freedom of Employment and Freedom of Speech to a position of normative supremacy, and thereby granted the courts (not just the Supreme Court) the ability to strike down legislation which is inconsistent with the rights embodied in the Basic Laws. Consequently, Barak held that the State of Israel has been transformed from a ] to a constitutional parliamentary democracy, in that its Basic Laws were to be interpreted as its constitution.<ref>
Simultaneously he advanced a number of standards, both for ] (mainly, the standard of the reasonableness of the administrative decision) and in the ] (the standard of ]), while blurring the distinction between the two. Barak's critics have argued that, in doing so, the Supreme Court under his leadership harmed judicial consistency and stability, particularly in the private sector.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20071217204226/http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695|archivedate=2007-12-17 |title=מקור ראשון העיתון הכי יהודי בעולם |publisher=Makorrishon.co.il |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref>
{{cite web
|url=http://huka.gov.il/index.php/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C:208
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929094535/http://huka.gov.il/index.php/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C%3A208
|url-status=dead
|archive-date=29 September 2007
|script-title=he:פרוטוקול:208 – חוקה בהסכמה רחבה
|language=he
|publisher=Huka.gov.il
|access-date=22 September 2010
}}</ref>


During his time as President of the Supreme Court, Barak advanced a ] approach, whereby the court was not required to limit itself to ], but rather was permitted to fill the gaps in the law through judicial legislation at ]. This approach was highly controversial and was met with much opposition, including by some politicians. The Israeli legal commentator Ze'ev Segal wrote in a 2004 article, "Barak sees the Supreme Court as a , far beyond the primary role as a decisor in disputes. The Supreme Court under his leadership is fulfilling a central role in the shaping of Israeli law, not much less than the Knesset. Barak is the leading power in the court, as a key judge in it for a quarter of a century, and as the number 1 judge for some 10 years now."
From 1992 on much of his judicial work was focused on advancing and shaping Israel's ] (a phrase which he coined), which he believed was brought about by the adoption of ] in the Israeli ] dealing with ]. According to Barak's approach, which was adopted by the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Revolution brought values such as the Right to Equality, Freedom of Employment and Freedom of Speech to a position of normative supremacy, and thereby granted the courts (not just the Supreme Court) the ability to strike down legislation which is inconsistent with the rights embodied in the Basic Laws. Consequently, Barak held, the State of Israel has been transformed from a ] to a constitutional parliamentary democracy, in that its Basic Laws were to be interpreted as its constitution.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://huka.gov.il/index.php/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C:208 |title=פרוטוקול:208 – חוקה בהסכמה רחבה |language={{he icon}} |publisher=Huka.gov.il |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref>


On 14 September 2006, upon reaching the mandatory age, Barak retired from the Supreme Court. Three months later he published his final judgments, among them a number of ] regarding damages in ] for residents of the ], Israel's policy of ], and preferential treatment for IDF veterans.
During his time as President of the court Barak advanced a ] approach, whereby the court was not required to limit itself to ], but rather was permitted to 'fill the gaps' in the law through 'judicial legislation' at ]. This approach was highly controversial and was met with much opposition, including by some politicians. The Israeli legal commentator Ze'ev Segal wrote in a 2004 article: "Barak sees the Supreme Court as a , far beyond the primary role as a decisor in disputes. The Supreme Court under his leadership is fulfilling a central role in the shaping of Israeli law, not much less than the Knesset. Barak is the leading power in the court, as a key judge in it for a quarter of a century, and as the 'number 1 judge' for some 10 years now."


Parallel to his service in the Supreme Court, Barak also served as the head of a committee which, for some twenty years, drafted the Israeli ], which worked to unite the 24 main civil law statutes in Israeli law under a single comprehensive law.
On September 14, 2006, upon reaching the mandatory retirement age, Barak resigned from the Supreme Court. Three months later he published his final judgements, among them a number of ] regarding damages in ] for residents of the ], Israel's policy of ], and preferential treatment for IDF veterans.


==== Selected judgments ====
Researcher ] says that Aharon Barak was "a leading proponent" of guidelines allowing torture—making Israel the "only country in the world where torture was legally sanctioned," according to the Israeli human rights group ]. He also gave a green light to administrative detentions, even as the judge conceded, “there is probably no State in the Western world that permits an administrative detention of someone who does not himself pose any danger to State security.”<ref name="mondoweiss.net">{{cite web|url=http://mondoweiss.net/2010/06/ambition-and-zionism.html |title=Ambition and orthodoxy (Kagan’s hero is also Dershowitz’s) |publisher=Mondoweiss.net |date=2010-06-29 |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref>
]
* CA 6821/93 ''United Hamizrahi Bank Ltd. v. Migdal Kfar Shitufi'' 49(4) P.D 221: The judgment in which Barak, together with other judges, described the ] as he understood it, which began following the legislation of ] and ]. In this case it was held that the Supreme Court could strike down Knesset legislation which is inconsistent with these Basic Laws.
* CA 243/83 ''The Jerusalem Municipality v. Gordon'', 39(1) P.D 113: In this judgment Barak reformed key aspects of Israeli ].
* HC 3269/95 ''Katz v. Regional Rabbinical Court'', 50(4) P.D 590: In this judgment Barak held, sitting as Deputy President to ], that the laws pertaining to property disputes arising from divorce are not caused by the act of marriage and thus are not to be regarded as matters of marriage. Rather, they derive from an agreement between the parties and are an aspect of the freedom of association. This case established that the Israeli ] must apply the doctrine of joint matrimonial property, a doctrine based in Israeli common law rather than the ] (Jewish religious law).
* CA 4628/93 ''State of Israel v. Guardian of Housing and Initiatives (1991) Ltd.'', 49(2) P.D 265: In this judgment Barak proposed a new approach to contract construction, holding that a lot of weight should be given to the circumstances which led to the formation of the contract. Some aspects of Barak's views in this regard remain controversial, but his general approach to contract construction is today accepted by the Supreme Court.
* CA 165/82 ''Kibbutz Hatzor v Assessing Officer'', 39(2) P.D 70: This judgment was a turning point in the interpretation of ] in Israel, in establishing that a ] was generally preferred to ] in determining the meaning of the law.
* FH 40/80 ''Koenig v. Cohen'', 36(3) P.D 701: In this judgment Barak, in the minority, expounded upon his approach to interpreting legislation. Today this approach has become an acceptable approach to statutory interpretation.
* CA 817/79, ''Kossoy v. Y.L. Feuchtwanger Bank Ltd.'', 38(3) P.D 253: In this judgment Barak imposed a duty of fairness upon one who controls a company, holding that one who controls a company cannot sell his shares of the company when as a consequence of doing so the company, and thus its shareholders, would be harmed.


=== South Africa v. Israel ===
He also approved the barrier wall that crosses through occupied territory.<ref name="mondoweiss.net"/>


On January 11, 2024, the Israeli government appointed Barak as an ad hoc judge to serve on the ] case ], brought against Israel by ] on charges of ].<ref>{{cite news
Parallel to his service in the Supreme Court, Barak also served as the head of a committee which, for some twenty years, drafted the Israeli ], which united the 24 main civil law statutes in Israeli law under a single comprehensive law.
| last1 = Berman
| last2 = Horowitz
| last3 = Sharon
| first1 = Lazar
| first2 = Michael
| first3 = Jeremy
| date = 7 January 2024
| title = Israel tasks ex-Supreme Court chief Aharon Barak to serve at Hague genocide hearings
| url = https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-tasks-ex-supreme-court-chief-aharon-barak-to-serve-at-hague-genocide-hearings/
| access-date = 10 January 2024
}}</ref> In this role, Barak voted against several of the provisional measures the ICJ imposed on Israel, such as preventing acts of genocide, protecting evidence, and facilitating humanitarian aid, suggesting he found insufficient basis in the evidence for these specific requirements.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Separate opinion of Judge ad hoc Barak {{!}} INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE |url=https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203859 |access-date=2024-11-13 |website=www.icj-cij.org}}</ref>


On June 5, 2024, Barak resigned from his role as an ad hoc judge, citing personal reasons.<ref>{{Cite news |date=5 June 2024 |title=Aharon Barak steps down from role as ad hoc judge at ICJ for personal reasons |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/aharon-barak-steps-down-from-role-as-ad-hoc-judge-at-icj-for-personal-reasons/ |work=Times of Israel}}</ref>
===Resumption of academic career===
After his resignation from the Supreme Court, Barak joined the staff of the ] in Herzliya, and he teaches in the Masters' Degree program for Commercial Law. He also lectures in the ] program. In addition, he continues to lecture at both ] and the ] in the ].


==Important judgments==
{{Expand section|date=December 2009}}
*CA 6821/93 '''United Hamizrahi Bank Ltd. v. Migdal Kfar Shitufi''' 49(4) P.D 221: The judgment in which Barak, together with other judges, described the ] as he understood it, which began following the legislation of ] and ]. In this case it was held that the Supreme Court could strike down Knesset legislation which is inconsistent with these Basic Laws.
*CA 243/83 '''The Jerusalem Municipality v. Gordon''', 39(1) P.D 113: In this judgment Barak reformed key aspects of Israeli ].
*HC 3269/95 '''Katz v. Regional Rabbinical Court''', 50(4) P.D 590: In this judgment Barak held, sitting as Deputy President to ], that the laws pertaining to property disputes arising from divorce are not caused by the act of marriage and thus are not to be regarded as matters of marriage. Rather, they derive from an agreement between the parties and are an aspect of the freedom of association. This case established that the Israeli ] must apply the doctrine of joint matrimonial property, a doctrine based in Israeli common law rather than the ] (Jewish religious law).
*CA 4628/93 '''State of Israel v. Guardian of Housing and Initiatives (1991) Ltd.''', 49(2) P.D 265: In this judgment Barak proposed a new approach to contract construction, holding that a lot of weight should be given to the circumstances which led to the formation of the contract. Some aspects of Barak's views in this regard remain controversial, but his general approach to contract construction is today accepted by the Supreme Court.
*CA 165/82 '''Kibbutz Hatzor v Assessing Officer''', 39(2) P.D 70: This judgment was a turning point in the interpretation of ] in Israel, in establishing that a ] was generally preferred to ] in determining the meaning of the law.
*FH 40/80 '''Koenig v. Cohen''', 36(3) P.D 701: In this judgment Barak, in the minority, expounded upon his approach to interpreting legislation. Today this approach has become an acceptable approach to statutory interpretation.
*CA 817/79, '''Kossoy v. Y.L. Feuchtwanger Bank Ltd.''', 38(3) P.D 253: In this judgment Barak imposed a duty of fairness upon one who controls a company, holding that one who controls a company cannot sell his shares of the company when as a consequence of doing so the company, and thus its shareholders, would be harmed.


==Impact, praise and criticism==
{{Neutrality|date=December 2009}}
Barak's decisions as President of the Supreme Court had a profound and widespread impact on many aspects of life in Israel, and were the subject of both much praise and substantial criticism. There is a widespread consensus that Barak has had an immense impact on Israeli law and the Supreme Court, but the question of whether or not this impact was desirable remains controversial. Barak championed a proactive judiciary that has interpreted Israel's ] as its constitution and challenged ] laws on that basis; his actions have been controversial because of this. Two of his books on legal commentary have been translated to ]. Professor ] has called him "the attorney in the country".<ref>{{dead link|date=September 2010}}</ref>


==Views and opinions==
Barak championed a proactive judiciary that has interpreted Israel's ] as its constitution and challenged Knesset laws on that basis; his actions have been controversial because of this.
Barak championed a proactive judiciary that has interpreted Israel's ] as its constitution, and challenged Knesset laws on that basis. Barak's legal philosophy starts with the belief that "the world is filled with law". This idea portrays law as an all-encompassing framework of human affairs from which no action can ever be immune: Whatever the law does not prohibit, it permits; either way, the law always has its say, on everything.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090501154533/https://www.daat.ac.il/DAAT/ezrachut/english/hillel.htm |date=1 May 2009 }}</ref>
Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, the new President of the Court, Judge ], said at his farewell ceremony: "At the heart of the development of the law of Israel stands Aharon Barak. He opened new horizons. The law as it stands after his differs in its purpose from the era which preceded him. Since his first year in the Supreme Court his rulings were groundbreaking, since '78 and until today he set the central legal norms that this court granted Israeli society."


On the issue of the substantial expansion of the ] and the test of reasonableness of an administrative decision (which grants the courts the power to overrule an administrative decision if the judge is convinced that it does not "stand bounds of reasonableness"), ] wrote:" Thus a situation has arisen whereby the Supreme Court may convene and decide on every conceivable issue. In addition to that the unreasonableness of an administrative decision will be grounds for judicial intervention. This was a total revolution in the judicial thinking which characterized the Supreme Court of previous generations, and this has given it the reputation of the most activist court in the world, causing both admiration and criticism. In practice, in many respects the Supreme Court under Barak has become an alternate government."
Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, the new President of the Court, Judge ], said at his farewell ceremony:


Barak is a secular Jew but believes in compromise with the religious sector, and state support for religion.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} His judgments on the interaction between religion and state have led to hostility towards him by some in the religious public. Religious Jews from all sectors of society (including both ] and ]) held a mass protest against the Supreme Court under his presidency, after the Supreme Court ruled that in cases of divorce the Israeli ] are required to decide property disputes according to the law of the Knesset rather than according to the ].{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}}
: "At the heart of the development of the law of Israel stands Aharon Barak. He opened new horizons. The law as it stands after his differs in its purpose from the era which preceded him. Since his first year in the Supreme Court his rulings were groundbreaking, since '78 and until today he set the central legal norms that this court granted Israeli society."
==Criticism==

Among critics of Barak's judicial activism are former President of the Supreme Court of Israel ], ], and ]. Posner, a judge on the ] and authority on jurisprudence, criticised Barak's decision to interpret the Basic Laws as Israel's constitution, stating that "only in Israel ... do judges confer the power of abstract review on themselves, without benefit of a constitutional or legislative provision."<ref name=Posner>
On the issue of the substantial expansion of the ] and the test of reasonableness of an administrative decision (which grants the courts the power to overrule an administrative decision if the judge is convinced that it does not "stand bounds of reasonableness"), Professor ], a liberal Israeli politician, has written:
{{cite web

| last = Posner
: "Thus a situation has arisen whereby the Supreme Court may convene and decide on every conceivable issue. In addition to that the unreasonableness of an administrative decision will be grounds for judicial intervention. This was a total revolution in the judicial thinking which characterized the Supreme Court of previous generations, and this has given it the reputation of the most activist court in the world, causing both admiration and criticism. In practice, in many respects the Supreme Court under Barak has become an alternate government."
| first = Richard A.

| author-link = Richard Posner
Among the most prominent critics of Barak's judicial activism are former President of the Supreme Court of Israel ], Professor ], and ].
| url = https://newrepublic.com/article/60919/enlightened-despot

| title = Enlightened Despot
], a judge on the ] and a highly respected authority on jurisprudence, is a fierce critic of Barak's activist judicial approach. He has criticised Barak's decision to interpret the Basic Laws as Israel's constitution, stating that "only in Israel... do judges confer the power of abstract review on themselves, without benefit of a constitutional or legislative provision."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tnr.com/article/enlightened-despot?page=0,1 |title=Enlightened Despot &#124; The New Republic |publisher=Tnr.com |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref> He also argues that Barak's idea of the courts enforcing a set of rights which they find in "substantive" democracy, rather than merely democratic political rights, actually involves a curtailing of democracy and results in a "hyperactive judiciary."<ref name=autogenerated1>Ibid.</ref> Furthermore, he claims that Barak's approach to the interpretation of statutes involves, in practice, interpretation in the context of the judge's own personal ideal system,<ref name=autogenerated1 /> and "opens up a vast realm for discretionary judgment", rather than providing for an objective interpretation of the statute.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tnr.com/article/enlightened-despot?page=0,2 |title=Enlightened Despot |publisher=The New Republic |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref> He is also critical of Barak's view of the ], arguing that, in effect, it is that "judicial power is unlimited and the legislature cannot remove judges."<ref name=autogenerated1 /> He also asserts that Barak fails to apply his own judicial philosophy in practice at times.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tnr.com/article/enlightened-despot?page=0,4 |title=Enlightened Despot &#124; The New Republic |publisher=Tnr.com |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref> Nevertheless, Posner says that "Barak himself is by all accounts brilliant, as well as austere and high-minded – Israel's Cato", and that while he would not regard Barak's judicial approach as a desirable universal model, it may be suited to Israel's specific circumtances.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tnr.com/article/enlightened-despot?page=0,5 |title=Enlightened Despot|publisher=The New Republic|date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref> He also suggests that if there were a ] for law, Barak would likely be among its early recipients.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tnr.com/article/enlightened-despot?page=0,0 |title=Enlightened Despot |publisher=The New Republic |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref>
| publisher = The New Republic

| date = 23 April 2007
Beyond the legal community, on both the left and right of the political spectrum, there are those who are highly critical of Barak. His judgements on matters of security, in particular, have been subject to criticism by some on both the left and the right.<ref>http://www.inn.co.il/SendMail.aspx?print=print&type=0&item=157246</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=640371 |title=אצלי זה פוליטי, נקודה – מוסף הארץ – הארץ |publisher=Haaretz |date= |accessdate=2010-09-22}}</ref><ref>http://www.yeshgvul.org/shame_0107_e.asp</ref>
| access-date =21 January 2010

}}</ref> He also argues that Barak's idea of the courts enforcing a set of rights which they find in "substantive" democracy, rather than merely democratic political rights, actually involves a curtailing of democracy and results in a "hyperactive judiciary."<ref name=Posner /> Furthermore, he claims that Barak's approach to the interpretation of statutes involves, in practice, interpretation in the context of the judge's own personal ideal system, and "opens up a vast realm for discretionary judgment", rather than providing for an objective interpretation of the statute.<ref name=Posner /> He is also critical of Barak's view of the ], arguing that, in effect, it is that "judicial power is unlimited and the legislature cannot remove judges."<ref name=Posner /> He also asserts that Barak fails to apply his own judicial philosophy in practice at times.<ref name=Posner /> Nevertheless, Posner said that "Barak himself is by all accounts brilliant, as well as austere and high-minded – Israel's Cato", and that while he would not regard Barak's judicial approach as a desirable universal model, it may be suited to Israel's specific circumstances.<ref name=Posner /> He also suggested that if there were a ] for law, Barak would likely be among its early recipients.<ref name=Posner />
Barak is a secular Jew but believes in compromise with the religious sector and state support for religion. Barak has been called a post-Zionist, an assertion he has denied.<ref>{{dead link|date=September 2010}}</ref>


His judgments on matters of security have been subject to criticism by some on both the left and the right.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.inn.co.il/SendMail.aspx?print%3Dprint%26type%3D0%26item%3D157246 |title=ערוץ 7 - רשת תקשורת ישראלית |access-date=2009-10-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929103209/http://www.inn.co.il/SendMail.aspx?print=print&type=0&item=157246 |archive-date=29 September 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=640371 |title=אצלי זה פוליטי, נקודה – מוסף הארץ – הארץ |publisher=Haaretz |access-date=22 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605022850/http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=640371 |archive-date=5 June 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.yeshgvul.org/shame_0107_e.asp |title=Archived copy |access-date=2009-10-29 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091101104846/http://www.yeshgvul.org/shame_0107_e.asp |archive-date=1 November 2009}}</ref>{{Vague|date=January 2024|reason=What judgments? What criticism?}}
His judgments on the interaction between religion and state have led to hostility towards him among some in the religious public. Religious Jews from all sectors of society (including both ] and ]) held a mass protest against the Supreme Court under his Presidency, after the Supreme Court ruled that in cases of divorce the Israeli ] are required to decide property disputes according to the law of the ] rather than according to the ].


==Key legal doctrines== ==Key legal doctrines==
*] * ]
*] * ]
*] * ]
*]<ref> (Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture 2009)</ref> * ]<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090826162114/http://www.fljs.org/section.aspx?id=2895 |date=26 August 2009 }} (Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture 2009)</ref>
*] * ]


== Awards and recognition==
Barak's legal philosophy starts with the belief that "the world is filled with law." This idea portrays law as an all-encompassing framework of human affairs from which no action can ever be immune: Whatever the law does not prohibit, it permits; either way, the law always has its say, on everything.<ref></ref>
* In 1975, Barak was awarded the ], in jurisprudence.<ref name="prize">{{cite web|title=Israel Prize Official Site – Recipients in 1975 (in Hebrew)|url=http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/PrasIsrael/Tashlag/Tashmab_Tashlag_Rikuz.htm?DictionaryKey=Tashlah}}</ref>

* In 1987, he was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the ].<ref name="AAAS">{{cite web|title=Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter B|url=http://www.amacad.org/publications/BookofMembers/ChapterB.pdf|access-date=17 May 2011|publisher=American Academy of Arts and Sciences}}</ref>
==Awards and honours==
* In 2003, he received Honorary Degrees from ].
*In 1975, Barak was awarded the ], in jurisprudence.<ref name=prize>{{cite web| title = Israel Prize Official Site – Recipients in 1975 (in Hebrew)| url = http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/PrasIsrael/Tashlag/Tashmab_Tashlag_Rikuz.htm?DictionaryKey=Tashlah}}</ref>
* In 2006, he received the Justice Prize of the Peter Gruber Foundation for "outstanding courage and principle who has devoted his life to the promotion of justice and the just rule of law."<ref>{{cite web|title=2006 Gruber Justice Prize Press Release|url=http://www.gruberprizes.org/GruberPrizes/Justice_PressRelease.php?awardid=1|access-date=21 January 2010}}</ref>
*In 2003, he received Honorary Degrees from ].
* In 2007, he received Honorary Degrees from ].
*In 2006, he received the Gruber Justice Prize of the Peter Gruber Foundation "for outstanding courage and principle who has devoted his life to the promotion of ] and the just ]." The Prize carries a gold medal and a US$250,000 cash prize.<ref>{{dead link|date=September 2010}} Retrieved: 23 August 2009.</ref>
*In 2007, he received Honorary Degrees from ].

==Quotations==
On balancing individual rights and security, from his opinion written for a September 6, 1999 decision of the Supreme Court of Israel:

:This is the destiny of democracy, as not all means are acceptable to it, and not all practices employed by its enemies are open before it. Although a democracy must often fight with one hand tied behind its back, it nonetheless has the upper hand. Preserving the Rule of Law and recognition of an individual's liberty constitutes an important component in its understanding of security. At the end of the day, they strengthen its spirit and its strength and allow it to overcome its difficulties.<ref>
{{cite web
| url = http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/GSStext.html
| title= Text of Supreme Court Decision on GSS Practices
| publisher = Jewish Virtual Library
| date = September 6, 1999
| accessdate = January 21, 2011
}}</ref>

From "Comparative Law, Originalism and the Role of a Judge in a Democracy: A Reply to Justice Scalia":

:As a judge, I do not have a political platform. I am not a political person. Right and left, religious and secular, rich and poor, man and woman, disabled and non-disabled – all are equal in my eyes. All are human beings, created in the image of the Creator. I shall protect the human dignity of each of them. I do not aspire to power. I do not seek to rule. I am aware of the chains that bind me as a judge. I have repeatedly emphasized the rule of law, and not the rule of the judge. I am aware of the importance of the other branches of government – the legislative and executive.<ref>
{{cite web
| url = http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:4-YA5Xp5740J:www.fulbright.org.il/fileadmin/fulbright/editor/images/news/Documents_for_news/Barak_50th_symposium_speech.doc
| title = Comparative Law, Originalism and the Role of a Judge in a Democracy: A Reply to Justice Scalia
| publisher = Fulbright Program, United States-Israel Educational Foundation
| date = January 29, 2006
| accessdate = January 21, 2011
}}</ref>


==Published works== ==Published works==
*''Judicial Discretion'' (1989) ISBN 978-0300040999 * ''Judicial Discretion'' (1989) {{ISBN|978-0-300-04099-9}}
*''Purposive Interpretation in Law'' (2005) ISBN 978-0691120072 Book review.<ref> * ''Purposive Interpretation in Law'' (2005) {{ISBN|978-0-691-12007-2}} Book review.<ref>
{{cite journal {{cite journal
| last = Kahn |last=Kahn
| first = Ronald |first=Ronald
| url = http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/barak0906.htm |url=http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/barak0906.htm
| title = PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION IN LAW, by Aharon Barak |title=PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION IN LAW, by Aharon Barak
| journal = Law and Politics Book Review |journal=Law and Politics Book Review
| volume = 16 |volume=16
| issue = 9 |issue=9
| doi = September, 2006 |date=September 2006
| pages = 708-738 |pages=708–738
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101206063014/http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/barak0906.htm
|archive-date=6 December 2010
}}</ref> }}</ref>
*''The Judge in a Democracy'' (2006) ISBN 978-0691120171 * ''The Judge in a Democracy'' (2006) {{ISBN|978-0-691-12017-1}}
* ''Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations'' (2012) {{isbn|978-1-107-40119-8}}
*
* ''Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right'' (2015) {{isbn|978-1-107-09023-1}}
*


==See also== ==See also==
*] * ]
*] * ]


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Ibid|date=July 2010}}
{{reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{Commons category|Aharon Barak}}
* – in the online exhibition "To Build and To Be Built" – The Contribution of Holocaust Survivors to the State of Israel – Yad Vashem
* – in the online exhibition "To Build and To Be Built" – The Contribution of Holocaust Survivors to the State of Israel – Yad Vashem
* (Princeton University Press, 2006)
* (Princeton University Press, 2006)
*
* *
*
*
* *
* Video of a lecture by Aharon Barak for the Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, Oxford, 2009


{{Attorneys General of Israel}} {{Attorneys General of Israel}}
{{Presidents of the Supreme Court of Israel}} {{Presidents of the Supreme Court of Israel}}


{{Authority control}}
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see ]. -->

| NAME =Barak, Aharon
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION =
| DATE OF BIRTH =16 September 1936
| PLACE OF BIRTH =], ]
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Barak, Aharon}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Barak, Aharon}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 December 2024

Former President of the Supreme Court of Israel

Aharon Barak
אהרן ברק‎
President of the Supreme Court of Israel
In office
13 August 1995 – 14 September 2006
Preceded byMeir Shamgar
Succeeded byDorit Beinisch
Personal details
Born (1936-09-16) 16 September 1936 (age 88)
Kaunas, Lithuania
NationalityIsraeli
Spouse Elisheva Barak-Ussoskin ​ ​(m. 1957; died 2024)
Children4
Parent(s)Zvi Brick, Leah Brick
Alma materHebrew University of Jerusalem
Signature

Aharon Barak (Hebrew: אהרן ברק; born 16 September 1936) is an Israeli lawyer and jurist who served as President of the Supreme Court of Israel from 1995 to 2006. Prior to this, Barak served as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel from 1978 to 1995, and before this as Attorney General of Israel from 1975 to 1978.

Barak was born with the name of Erik Brick in Kaunas, Lithuania in 1936. Having survived the Holocaust, he and his family later immigrated to Mandatory Palestine in 1947. He studied law, international relations and economics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and obtained his Bachelor of Laws in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, he was drafted into the Israeli military.

From 1974 to 1975, Barak was dean of the law faculty of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Barak is currently a law professor at Reichman University in Herzliya, and has taught at institutions including Yale Law School, Central European University, Georgetown University Law Center, and the University of Toronto Faculty of Law.

Biography

Erik Brick (later Aharon Barak) was born in Kaunas, Lithuania, the only son of Zvi Brick, an attorney, and his wife Leah, a teacher. After the Nazi occupation of the city in 1941, the family was in the Kovno ghetto. In an interview with HaOlam HaZeh, Barak told how a Lithuanian farmer saved his life by hiding him under a load of potatoes and smuggling him out of the ghetto, thereby risking his own life if caught. At the end of the war, after wandering through Hungary, Austria, and Italy, Barak and his parents reached Rome, where they spent the next two years. In 1947, they received travel papers and immigrated to Mandatory Palestine. After a brief period in a moshav, the family settled in Jerusalem.

He studied law, international relations and economics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and obtained his Bachelor of Laws in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, having been drafted into the Israeli Defense Forces, he served in the office of the Financial Advisor to the Chief of Staff. Upon discharging his service he returned to the Hebrew University, where he completed his doctoral dissertation with distinction in 1963. Simultaneously he began work as an intern at the Attorney General's office. When the Attorney General began dealing with the trial of Adolf Eichmann, Barak, being a Holocaust survivor, preferred not to be involved in the work. At his request, he was transferred to the State Attorney's office to complete his internship. Upon completing his internship he was recognised as a certified attorney.

Barak is married to Elisheva Barak-Ussoskin, former vice president of the National Labor Court, with whom he has three daughters and a son, all trained in the law. Barak's son-in-law Ram Landes made a one-hour documentary film about Barak in 2009 called The Judge (השופט‎), based on an in-depth interview with Barak.

Academic career

Between 1966 and 1967 Barak studied at Harvard University. In 1968 he was appointed as a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and in 1974 was named the dean of its law faculty. In 1975, at age 38, he was awarded the Israel Prize for legal research. In the same year he became a member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. In 1978 he became a foreign member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

After his retirement from the Supreme Court, Barak joined the staff of the Reichman University in Herzliya, and he teaches in the master's degree program for Commercial Law. He also lectures in the Bachelor of Laws program. In addition, he continues to lecture at both the Yale Law School and the University of Alabama in the United States, as well as lecturing as a Distinguished Visitor at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law.

Judicial career

Attorney General of Israel

Between 1975 and 1978, Barak served as the Attorney General of Israel. Among his well-known decisions in this capacity were:

  • The decision to launch a criminal investigation against Asher Yadlin, CEO of Clalit Health Services and a nominee for the position of director of the Bank of Israel. Yadlin was convicted of accepting a bribe and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. During this incident Barak coined the so-called Buzaglo test.
  • The decision to continue with the police investigation of Housing and Construction Minister Avraham Ofer, despite the Minister's request that the investigation be terminated. Ofer committed suicide in 1977, prior to the conclusion of the investigation.
  • The decision to prosecute Leah Rabin due to the Dollar Account affair. This decision brought about the resignation of the Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. In justifying his decision not to prosecute Yitzhak Rabin for the affair, Barak has argued that "Rabin was severely punished in that he was forced to resign from his position. There was no room to punish him further."
Barak (sitting; left) at a meeting at Camp David with (l-r) Menachem Begin, Anwar Sadat, and Ezer Weizmann, 1978

Barak was appointed by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in 1978 as the legal advisor to the Israeli delegation for negotiating the Camp David Accords. In his book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, Jimmy Carter praises Barak as a negotiator despite the political disagreements between them.

Supreme Court of Israel

On 22 September 1978, Barak began his service as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel – the youngest of all of the judges. In 1982–83 he served as a member of the Kahan Commission, a state investigation committee formed to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Sabra and Shatila massacre. As part of the committee's conclusions, then Minister of Defense Ariel Sharon was removed from his position. The committee further recommended that he never be appointed to that position again in the future. In 1993, with the retirement of the Deputy President of the Supreme Court Menachem Elon, Barak was appointed the Deputy President. Subsequently, with the retirement of the President Meir Shamgar on 13 August 1995, Barak was appointed the President of the Supreme Court.

In the course of his service on the Supreme Court, Barak greatly expanded the range of issues with which the court dealt. He canceled the standing test which Israel's Supreme Court had used frequently, and greatly expanded the scope of justiciability by allowing petitions on a range of matters. Professor Daphna Barak-Erez commented that:"One of the most significant impacts of Judge Barak on Israeli law is found in the change which he led with regard to all matters of justiciability. Judge Barak was the instigator and leader of the outlook which regards the traditional doctrine of justiciability as inappropriately and unnecessarily limiting the matters which the court deals with. Under the leadership of Judge Barak, the Supreme Court significantly increased the fields in which it is ."

Simultaneously, he advanced a number of standards, both for public administration (mainly, the standard of the reasonableness of the administrative decision) and in the private sector (the standard of good faith), while blurring the distinction between the two. Barak's critics have argued that, in doing so, the Supreme Court under his leadership harmed judicial consistency and stability, particularly in the private sector.

After 1992, much of his judicial work was focused on advancing and shaping Israel's Constitutional Revolution (a phrase which he coined), which he believed was brought about by the adoption of Basic Laws in the Israeli Knesset dealing with human rights. According to Barak's approach, which was adopted by the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Revolution brought values such as the Right to Equality, Freedom of Employment and Freedom of Speech to a position of normative supremacy, and thereby granted the courts (not just the Supreme Court) the ability to strike down legislation which is inconsistent with the rights embodied in the Basic Laws. Consequently, Barak held that the State of Israel has been transformed from a parliamentary democracy to a constitutional parliamentary democracy, in that its Basic Laws were to be interpreted as its constitution.

During his time as President of the Supreme Court, Barak advanced a judicial activist approach, whereby the court was not required to limit itself to judicial interpretation, but rather was permitted to fill the gaps in the law through judicial legislation at common law. This approach was highly controversial and was met with much opposition, including by some politicians. The Israeli legal commentator Ze'ev Segal wrote in a 2004 article, "Barak sees the Supreme Court as a , far beyond the primary role as a decisor in disputes. The Supreme Court under his leadership is fulfilling a central role in the shaping of Israeli law, not much less than the Knesset. Barak is the leading power in the court, as a key judge in it for a quarter of a century, and as the number 1 judge for some 10 years now."

On 14 September 2006, upon reaching the mandatory age, Barak retired from the Supreme Court. Three months later he published his final judgments, among them a number of precedents regarding damages in tort for residents of the Palestinian territories, Israel's policy of targeted killing, and preferential treatment for IDF veterans.

Parallel to his service in the Supreme Court, Barak also served as the head of a committee which, for some twenty years, drafted the Israeli Civil Codex, which worked to unite the 24 main civil law statutes in Israeli law under a single comprehensive law.

Selected judgments

Barak's portrait at Supreme Court of Israel
  • CA 6821/93 United Hamizrahi Bank Ltd. v. Migdal Kfar Shitufi 49(4) P.D 221: The judgment in which Barak, together with other judges, described the Constitutional Revolution as he understood it, which began following the legislation of Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty and Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation. In this case it was held that the Supreme Court could strike down Knesset legislation which is inconsistent with these Basic Laws.
  • CA 243/83 The Jerusalem Municipality v. Gordon, 39(1) P.D 113: In this judgment Barak reformed key aspects of Israeli tort law.
  • HC 3269/95 Katz v. Regional Rabbinical Court, 50(4) P.D 590: In this judgment Barak held, sitting as Deputy President to Meir Shamgar, that the laws pertaining to property disputes arising from divorce are not caused by the act of marriage and thus are not to be regarded as matters of marriage. Rather, they derive from an agreement between the parties and are an aspect of the freedom of association. This case established that the Israeli Rabbinical courts must apply the doctrine of joint matrimonial property, a doctrine based in Israeli common law rather than the Halakha (Jewish religious law).
  • CA 4628/93 State of Israel v. Guardian of Housing and Initiatives (1991) Ltd., 49(2) P.D 265: In this judgment Barak proposed a new approach to contract construction, holding that a lot of weight should be given to the circumstances which led to the formation of the contract. Some aspects of Barak's views in this regard remain controversial, but his general approach to contract construction is today accepted by the Supreme Court.
  • CA 165/82 Kibbutz Hatzor v Assessing Officer, 39(2) P.D 70: This judgment was a turning point in the interpretation of tax law in Israel, in establishing that a purposive approach was generally preferred to textualism in determining the meaning of the law.
  • FH 40/80 Koenig v. Cohen, 36(3) P.D 701: In this judgment Barak, in the minority, expounded upon his approach to interpreting legislation. Today this approach has become an acceptable approach to statutory interpretation.
  • CA 817/79, Kossoy v. Y.L. Feuchtwanger Bank Ltd., 38(3) P.D 253: In this judgment Barak imposed a duty of fairness upon one who controls a company, holding that one who controls a company cannot sell his shares of the company when as a consequence of doing so the company, and thus its shareholders, would be harmed.

South Africa v. Israel

On January 11, 2024, the Israeli government appointed Barak as an ad hoc judge to serve on the International Court of Justice case South Africa v. Israel, brought against Israel by South Africa on charges of genocide. In this role, Barak voted against several of the provisional measures the ICJ imposed on Israel, such as preventing acts of genocide, protecting evidence, and facilitating humanitarian aid, suggesting he found insufficient basis in the evidence for these specific requirements.

On June 5, 2024, Barak resigned from his role as an ad hoc judge, citing personal reasons.


Views and opinions

Barak championed a proactive judiciary that has interpreted Israel's Basic Law as its constitution, and challenged Knesset laws on that basis. Barak's legal philosophy starts with the belief that "the world is filled with law". This idea portrays law as an all-encompassing framework of human affairs from which no action can ever be immune: Whatever the law does not prohibit, it permits; either way, the law always has its say, on everything. Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, the new President of the Court, Judge Dorit Beinisch, said at his farewell ceremony: "At the heart of the development of the law of Israel stands Aharon Barak. He opened new horizons. The law as it stands after his differs in its purpose from the era which preceded him. Since his first year in the Supreme Court his rulings were groundbreaking, since '78 and until today he set the central legal norms that this court granted Israeli society."

On the issue of the substantial expansion of the right of standing and the test of reasonableness of an administrative decision (which grants the courts the power to overrule an administrative decision if the judge is convinced that it does not "stand bounds of reasonableness"), Amnon Rubinstein wrote:" Thus a situation has arisen whereby the Supreme Court may convene and decide on every conceivable issue. In addition to that the unreasonableness of an administrative decision will be grounds for judicial intervention. This was a total revolution in the judicial thinking which characterized the Supreme Court of previous generations, and this has given it the reputation of the most activist court in the world, causing both admiration and criticism. In practice, in many respects the Supreme Court under Barak has become an alternate government."

Barak is a secular Jew but believes in compromise with the religious sector, and state support for religion. His judgments on the interaction between religion and state have led to hostility towards him by some in the religious public. Religious Jews from all sectors of society (including both Haredim and Religious Zionists) held a mass protest against the Supreme Court under his presidency, after the Supreme Court ruled that in cases of divorce the Israeli religious courts of law are required to decide property disputes according to the law of the Knesset rather than according to the Halakha.

Criticism

Among critics of Barak's judicial activism are former President of the Supreme Court of Israel Moshe Landau, Ruth Gavison, and Richard Posner. Posner, a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and authority on jurisprudence, criticised Barak's decision to interpret the Basic Laws as Israel's constitution, stating that "only in Israel ... do judges confer the power of abstract review on themselves, without benefit of a constitutional or legislative provision." He also argues that Barak's idea of the courts enforcing a set of rights which they find in "substantive" democracy, rather than merely democratic political rights, actually involves a curtailing of democracy and results in a "hyperactive judiciary." Furthermore, he claims that Barak's approach to the interpretation of statutes involves, in practice, interpretation in the context of the judge's own personal ideal system, and "opens up a vast realm for discretionary judgment", rather than providing for an objective interpretation of the statute. He is also critical of Barak's view of the separation of powers, arguing that, in effect, it is that "judicial power is unlimited and the legislature cannot remove judges." He also asserts that Barak fails to apply his own judicial philosophy in practice at times. Nevertheless, Posner said that "Barak himself is by all accounts brilliant, as well as austere and high-minded – Israel's Cato", and that while he would not regard Barak's judicial approach as a desirable universal model, it may be suited to Israel's specific circumstances. He also suggested that if there were a Nobel prize for law, Barak would likely be among its early recipients.

His judgments on matters of security have been subject to criticism by some on both the left and the right.

Key legal doctrines

Awards and recognition

  • In 1975, Barak was awarded the Israel Prize, in jurisprudence.
  • In 1987, he was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  • In 2003, he received Honorary Degrees from Brandeis University.
  • In 2006, he received the Justice Prize of the Peter Gruber Foundation for "outstanding courage and principle who has devoted his life to the promotion of justice and the just rule of law."
  • In 2007, he received Honorary Degrees from Columbia University.

Published works

See also

References

  1. "Aharon Barak – President of the Supreme Court". Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  2. Avnery, Uri (18 April 2015). "There Are Still Judges…". Gush Shalom. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
  3. "Aharon Barak – Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  4. Carter, James Earl (2006). Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. New York: Simon and Schuster. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-7432-8502-5.
  5. Neuer, Hillel (1998). "Aharon Barak's Revolution". Azure. Winter 5758 (3). Retrieved 24 January 2011.mirror Archived 1 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  6. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 29 October 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  7. "השופט כבוחן כליות ולב". Makorrishon.co.il. Archived from the original on 13 March 2007. Retrieved 22 September 2010.
  8. פרוטוקול:208 – חוקה בהסכמה רחבה (in Hebrew). Huka.gov.il. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 22 September 2010.
  9. Berman, Lazar; Horowitz, Michael; Sharon, Jeremy (7 January 2024). "Israel tasks ex-Supreme Court chief Aharon Barak to serve at Hague genocide hearings". Retrieved 10 January 2024.
  10. "Separate opinion of Judge ad hoc Barak | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE". www.icj-cij.org. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  11. "Aharon Barak steps down from role as ad hoc judge at ICJ for personal reasons". Times of Israel. 5 June 2024.
  12. Aharon Barak's revolution Archived 1 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ^ Posner, Richard A. (23 April 2007). "Enlightened Despot". The New Republic. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  14. "ערוץ 7 - רשת תקשורת ישראלית". Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 29 October 2009.
  15. "אצלי זה פוליטי, נקודה – מוסף הארץ – הארץ". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 22 September 2010.
  16. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 1 November 2009. Retrieved 29 October 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  17. Aharon Barak on the Role of Proportionality Archived 26 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine (Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture 2009)
  18. "Israel Prize Official Site – Recipients in 1975 (in Hebrew)".
  19. "Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter B" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 17 May 2011.
  20. "2006 Gruber Justice Prize Press Release". Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  21. Kahn, Ronald (September 2006). "PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION IN LAW, by Aharon Barak". Law and Politics Book Review. 16 (9): 708–738. Archived from the original on 6 December 2010.

External links

Attorneys General of Israel Israel
Presidents of the Supreme Court of Israel Israel
Historic
Categories: