Revision as of 22:05, 25 February 2006 editKDRGibby (talk | contribs)2,454 edits →Underground economy← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:30, 17 July 2024 edit undoRublamb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers107,842 edits OneClickArchived "East Asian model" to Talk:Market economy/Archive 1 |
(239 intermediate revisions by 83 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{expand}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
|
{{American English}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|social=yes |importance=high }} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=high|libertarianism=yes |libertarianism-importance=high}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{course assignment|course=Education Program:New College of Florida/Work Organization and Its Alternatives (Spring)|term=2013 Q1}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Incomplete introduction == |
|
{{Bizetasks}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to bring this to the attention of the article maintainers: In the current state (June 2019), the article has an incomplete sentence in the introduction. The 3rd paragraph of the introduction ends in an unfinished sentence which itself only reads "It is this" |
|
'''Archives:''' ] |
|
|
|
Someone seems to have had plans for further explanations that were not completed or were improperly abandoned. Would be great if someone could investigate. Thx! <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Sanctions - do they set the "free" of the free market aside? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although sanctions (on Russia) have been applied for about 10 years they have recently been applied more and more. Sanctions interfere with free market practices because companies must pick their suppliers and customers from a list of allowed business partners, not select by price. I wonder where the threshold is which disturbs the free market so much that the "free" is set aside. E.G. The "crippling" sanctions are obviously designed to punish the Russian people but in the process they disturb the free market. This should probably be discussed one day. ] (]) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC) |
|
I will continue to expand this page later tommorrow...much more to come. (Gibby 06:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP23 - Sect 201 - Thu== |
|
== Underground economy == |
|
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_SP23_-_Sect_201_-_Thu_(Spring_2023) | assignments = ] | start_date = 2023-01-25 | end_date = 2023-05-05 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 23:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|
"The theoretical model of a large-scale free market economy does not occur legally, however the ] may be seen as an actualized free market economy." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what is the allocation of resources and price influence in mixed economy ] (]) 18:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
"May be seen as" is pretty weaselly. A windmill may be seen as a giant waving its arms. Can we cite someone as claiming this? I have my doubts: "free market" presumably means "free from coercion" not just "free from taxes". In my experience, black markets are seldom free from coercion. - ] | ] 06:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== No mention of a medium of exchange == |
|
:Underground economy and black market don't have the same connotations. Underground economy is a market where trade simply takes place without government taking a cut. Hiring a worker without filing out government forms and paying him in cash, garage sales, selling stuff on Ebay, etc. ] 16:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no reference to a medium of exchange in this entire article. It seems to me that having a medium (USD, £, gold) is an important part of a market, and of setting prices by supply and demand. Adding information on a medium of exchange will likely effect most paragraphs in this article. Any thoughts? ] (]) 16:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Again: do you have a citation for "may be seen"? - ] | ] 22:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate how Resources will be allocated in a market economy? ] (]) 13:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
==neutrality== |
|
|
|
|
|
The neutrality complaint is stupid. The arguement being made is that it presents the "libertarian view point" on markets. I disagree, I think that by reporting what Hayek and Friedman state about the market is accurate. They, afterall, are economists. Discussing how market transactions are voluntary does not mean that social market theorists are any less valid. Likely they would agree (otherwise they'd get rid of the market and be called Socialists!!!!) There is a section that discusses market externalities, a section that discusses market participation and a section about the free market. There is not much to complain about but the factual reporting of market operations. Nikodemos is simply on a communist hell bent anti libertarian tirade. |
|
Just wanted to bring this to the attention of the article maintainers: In the current state (June 2019), the article has an incomplete sentence in the introduction. The 3rd paragraph of the introduction ends in an unfinished sentence which itself only reads "It is this"
Someone seems to have had plans for further explanations that were not completed or were improperly abandoned. Would be great if someone could investigate. Thx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.108.249 (talk) 06:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Although sanctions (on Russia) have been applied for about 10 years they have recently been applied more and more. Sanctions interfere with free market practices because companies must pick their suppliers and customers from a list of allowed business partners, not select by price. I wonder where the threshold is which disturbs the free market so much that the "free" is set aside. E.G. The "crippling" sanctions are obviously designed to punish the Russian people but in the process they disturb the free market. This should probably be discussed one day. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:B595:E707:A408:A278 (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
There is no reference to a medium of exchange in this entire article. It seems to me that having a medium (USD, £, gold) is an important part of a market, and of setting prices by supply and demand. Adding information on a medium of exchange will likely effect most paragraphs in this article. Any thoughts? AbrahamWright (talk) 16:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)