Misplaced Pages

User talk:Shrike: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:41, 6 February 2011 editPexise (talk | contribs)1,644 edits Your warning: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:11, 30 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,955 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Shrike/Archive 1) (botTag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archives|search=yes|index=/Index}}
'''Welcome!'''
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(2d)
|archive = User talk:Shrike/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Monthly archive list|startyear=2011|monthformat=mmmm|root=User_talk:Shrike/Archives/}}


{{-}}
Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{&#123;helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp; ←] <sup>]</sup> 20:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

== Porath, Meretz, etc. ==

"Prominent" seems hardly controversial - Porath is surely a prominent historian of the Palestinians. As to whether having once been a member of Meretz (and when he wrote the review, in 1986, he was obviously ''not'' yet a member of Meretz, since it didn't exist until 1992) makes one a "leftist," that seems dubious to me. Meretz isn't really all that left wing in the traditional sense of the word. It is perhaps a pro-Palestinian party, but I don't understand why "pro-Palestinian" should translate to "left-wing." In terms of domestic politics, Meretz seems to be a fairly standard issue center-left party. And Porath, of course, is not any longer left wing at all (as I think you know from the fact that you stated on my talk page that he was "a leftist back then." To take a rather more extreme case, would he ever refer to Mussolini as "Leftist journalist Benito Mussolini"?). Calling him a "leftist historian" implies that he's a figure like ] or ]. He is obviously not, and we shouldn't be trying to mislead readers into thinking that he is. But if you want to take out "prominent", I won't revert you, so long as you don't add "leftist". ] 21:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Why should I take seriously the comments of someone who says "defiantly" when they mean "definitely?" Beyond that, Porath's rather considerable defection from the "pro-Palestinian" camp means that we should not so describe him. even if he was relatively pro-Palestinian when he wrote the review, his later development (towards a more hardline position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict) makes it fairly clear that this was not due to any inherent anti-Israel bias, and means that it is misleading to refer to him as "pro-Palestinian." If you want to start an article on Porath, though, that'd be worthwhile. ] 22:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


== Mitigating comments on confirmed Israeli attacks on ambulances and hospitals ==

:Please see ] ] 21:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
== POV ==
I noticed you have twice removed an image and called it POV. I am curious, how is it POV? ~'''] (])''' 16:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
:This does not make it POV. You dont need to show both sides in the same image, and most images for wars do not show both sides. Take a look at ], ], ], ], ], ]. ~'''] (])''' 17:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
::I have not been able to find any pictures of their side from this conflict that qualify for fair use. If we find one that is better quality than the artillery fire image, we can use it. It all depends on quality of the image. ~'''] (])''' 15:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

==Your vandalism of ]==
Please stop this, it is childish and futile. The timeline and additions to it will continue to be made to hightlight just how idiotic is really is. ] 20:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

:Check the original post- took place where? on the weBLOG. duh ] 20:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

::Check the homepage for Israel Insider, look top right, see the link saying "today's weblog"? duh. Dont mess with the page again please unless you can raise you contribution above vandalism ] 20:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

:Also:
" A New Insider Blog System: We believe in blogging. For those of you who have been sleeping for the last year or two, blogs (short for "web logs") are online diaries which express a person's private thoughts and public perspectives, combining intimate commentary and links to external web sites. We know from the thousands who use and view our wildly successful Talkback system that you have strong opinions! If a blog can propel a guy like Howard Dean to national prominence, just think of what it will do for our current readers and future bloggers. Look for this interactive feature soon, free for registered Insiders" From thats where it first appeared. ] 20:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

==Please stop vandalising the Qana conspiracy page==
Korets political sympathys, ie. that he is a zionist, are self attested to. They are not in dispute. His political views are relevant to the theories he came up with. Take it to the talk page if in doubt. ] 18:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

== Why did you revert my edit? ==

My edit to ] article removed a phrase of 'political spin' which had obviously been added to express POV by renaming an incident from its article name to one used pretty much only used by supporters of that conflict. The name, which you have now reverted back to, is blatent POV and only seeks to confuse and mislead rather than present a link to the article by a name everyone understands (which is why it is the actual name of the article). The wikipedia norm is overwhelmingly to refer to conflicts like the one in question by a commonly understood and descriptive name, not by the politically assigned military codename (try find any other war referred to by it's military codename and not a common, more descriptive name). As you did not state in the comment box why you reverted my edit (something which is actually against Misplaced Pages's code of conduct) I am asking you here to please explain why you performed the revert? ] 17:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

== POV-pushing in pie chart removal ==

Regarding . Shrike, since say you are new, I advise you to read all prior and on the matter of this pie chart (which only says what is already stated in the article itself!) and not hop on the censorship bandwagon that did not propose anything better in the request for and discussion. Reading your talk page, it seems as if you seem to also be pushing some sort of stong pro-Zionist ideology on Misplaced Pages... please leave your personal beliefs out of articles trying to be objective and encyclopedic (see ]). ~ ] 21:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

See . ~ ] 22:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

== Hezbollah casualties ==
You are doing a great job resisting the POV chart of Hezb casualties. You might be interested in ] where there is an on going attempt, invoving sock puppets, to censor the information that several groups have reproted 500-700 hezbollah casualties. ] 19:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

== RfA ==

] posted an RfA here ] but for some reason "forgot" to list you as an involved party ] 16:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

== Reverting edits on Jerusalem page without discussion ==

I've noticed you've reverted twice now the change I made to the introduction of the ] article on the number of mentions of Jerusalem in the New and Old Testaments. You haven't participated in the discussion or argued any of the reasons why you have done this. Could you please explain on the Jerusalem talk page what your thinking is? I'm asking you this in good faith because from my vantage point it's quite irritating and seems POV ] 02:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

== Your revert of ] ==

If you , such as ], could you please make sure that you revert it to the proper version, instead of reinstating a highly pov vandalized version? ]] <sup>] to electro-pop ] from 1984.</sup> 15:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

== Defamation warning ==

] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you add ] content{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Ilan Pappé|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-defamatory4}} -->
:It was mistake.I just reverted and don't paid attantion to which version.

== ] ==

הסרת שורה לגבי ההשראה (שבראייתך לא) שאב פייר ג'ומייל מהפלנחות הספרדיות להקמת מפלגתו. אולם פייר ג'ומאייל כן נפגש עם חברים מהפלנחות במהלך אולימפיאדת 1936 (בה הוא השתתף כספורטאי). שם המפלגה גם כן מעיד בבירור על השפעת הפלנחות על ג'ומאייל. אני מזמינה אותך להעיף מבט ב. בתור ישראלית גם אני יחסית אוהדת את המפלגה, אך לא ניתן להתכחש לאספקטים פשיסטיים מסויימים שהיו קיימים בפלנגות. ] 22:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
==Image tagging for Image:Xerox-star-8010-large.jpg==
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
* ]
* ]

This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 20:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

== Shalom ==

Welcome. Just be carefull around here. obey rules, regulations, policies and be polite even to those who are pushing their agenda to every article.
Best, ] 19:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

== finkelstein addition on memri ==

Shrike, I accept your deletion of the 'famous' part was correct. Can you please give your opinion in the discussion seeing as you have already read the addition, see http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Middle_East_Media_Research_Institute#finkelstein_reverts
] 03:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

==AfD nomination of ]==
An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed by me for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> ] 10:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

==Non-free use disputed for Image:NewNightWatchcover.jpg==

{| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;"
|]
|This file may be '''deleted'''.
|}
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at ] and then go to ] and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] 16:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

== Quit editing the Jonathan Pollard page ==

You claim there's widespread controversy over his jailing but you keep reverting to his official site as the source. It seems pretty clear cut to me - he broke the law, broke his plea agreement and got sent to jail. Find an external source. {{unsigned|Dakdakdak}}

== Possibly unfree Image:Shrike-Hyperion.jpg ==
An image that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ] 10:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)<!-- Template:Idw-pui -->

==Edit warring reminder==

Regarding the ongoing edit war on ], in which you are involved, I'd like to remind you of ]'s prohibition of reverting as an editing technique. Please note that ''"The rule does not convey an entitlement to revert three times each day, nor does it endorse reverting as an editing technique; rather, the rule is an "electric fence". Editors may still be blocked even if they have not made more than three reverts in any given 24 hour period, if their behavior is clearly disruptive."'' I would request that you bear this in mind and use the article discussion page or ] to resolve your dispute. -- ] 15:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

== August 2007 ==
{{{icon|] }}}Please do not delete content from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ]. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been ]. If you would like to experiment, please use ] for test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] 15:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
:Don't delete content, it's as simple as that. And don't go adding nonsense warnings to my talk page. Happy editing! -- ] 15:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

== Deletions on ] ==

You have reverted "POV edits" there, commanding me to "Find WP:RS sources for your info". As you know, this is exactly what I already did. The edits you removed contained no less than four sources. The statement that Canada Park "was founded by the ] on the razed ] villages of ], ] and ], which were demolished by Israel after the ] in order to widen the ]." was sourced to ], the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ''Outlook'', an "independent, secular Jewish publication with a socialist-humanist perspective" out of British Colombia. The previous version, which inserts language that this is only "according to the Palestinians", is a clear lie; even the park's own signage says this when it hasn't been vandalized by people like yourself (it's in the Ha'aretz source).

The statement that "The former residents of the villages fled to refugee camps in the ] and ], where most of them remain today," is sourced to a P.A. official in a Canadian government run conference. I do not see how it could possibly be contentious, as it's an utterly mundane and obvious claim, but to accommodate any concerns I have changed it to include, "according to the Palestinian Authority".

At this point, there are absolutely no grounds to challenge the article on ]. If you continue to remove information with patently false justification, you will face sanction from the wider Misplaced Pages community. ] 22:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

==Your POV tag placement at ]==

Hi there. I've made a number of changes to the article since your last comment. I would appreciate it if you could respond at the talk page to my request to remove the POV tag, in light of these changes. Thanks. ] 16:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

:I made a change in response to your latest concern. In order to move forward further, you are going to have to provide sources you think would be useful toward improving NPOV. If there are none, I will be removing the tag. ] 19:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


== About Raafat el-Haggan ==
We have to talk, can't just keep undoing forever!
first of all let's agree on not undoing anything.

the first line says "Refaat Ali Slueiman el-Gammal (Arabic: رفعت علي سليمان الجمال‎) (July 1, 1927 – 1982), better known as Raafat el-Haggan (Arabic: رأفت الهجّان‎) in Egypt and as Jack Beton in Israel, was an Egyptian spy who spent 17 years performing clandestine operations in Israel. Most information about him is still confidential."

what don't you agree on this?

you always undo it to

"Refaat Ali Slueiman el-Gammal (Arabic: رفعت علي سليمان الجمال‎) (July 1, 1927 – 1982), better known as Raafat el-Haggan (Arabic: رأفت الهجّان‎) in Egypt and as Jack Beton in Israel,"

which is meaningless!!
Refaat was a spy and he was indeed Egyptian and spent 17 years performing clandestine operations inside Israel
what's wrong about that?!!

let's first agree on this line then we will continue to the other parts ... <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==] deletion notification==

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning ]. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, ], was recently ]. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether ] should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see ]. -- ] (]) 17:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

== "Vandalism" ==

Please don't call my good faith edits . Especially when I've made the effort to discuss them on the talk page while you've failed to do so. --] 14:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

== Gilad Shalit is a SOLDIER ==

He was captured in battle. Don't revert the page unless you have a good reason to do so.

==Israel and the apartheid analogy ==
Hi, you reverted an edit of mine, I've started a discussion on the subject ]. Please join the discussion, ] (]) 23:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

== Your warning ==

I am discussing my edits on the talk page for ] please engage in the discussion rather than threatening blocks. The 1RR warning on the talk page was also added after my revert. ] (]) 15:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:11, 30 December 2024

Archiving icon
Archives
Index
Archive 1


This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


Archives