Revision as of 23:37, 9 February 2011 editPKM (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,345 editsm →Banner: userbox template← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:00, 28 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's History/Archive 15) (bot | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's History/nav}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell| | |||
{{talkpage|wp=yes|search=yes}} | |||
{{WikiProject Women}} | |||
{{WikiProject Women's History}} | {{WikiProject Women's History}} | ||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
|maxarchivesize = 70K | |||
|counter = 1 | |||
|counter = 15 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 1 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
|algo = old(90d) | |algo = old(90d) | ||
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's History/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's History/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{tmbox | text = '''This WikiProject was featured on the ] at the Signpost on 12 March 2012.}} | |||
__TOC__ | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's History/nav}} | |||
{{old move|date=6 March 2024|destination=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's history|result=no consensus|link=Special:Permalink/1216399605#Requested move 6 March 2024}} | |||
== Getting Started == | |||
Want to help but don't know how? Got a technical question? Ask it here. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (]) 02:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
: I wrote up a last night with more information on how to get started helping. If/when you write one, follow up here with a link. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (]) 14:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== January 2020 at Women in Red == | |||
=== Stub identification -- how? === | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" | |||
I want to dive in identifying stub articles that need work. I can add the stub template to them, but should I be marking them here on WP:WMNHIST or something as well? How will we find them again? --] (]) 21:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | | |||
:Current conversation below ("Stub templates and marking") and at ] is uncovering a myriad of issues around Misplaced Pages policy relative to officially-named stubs. I'm inclined to avoid the stub process altogether in favor of the assessment template ] has suggested, which I think will be more useful for more purposes. If you'd like to set up a templates section in the above nav, start a basic assessment template, and start a discussion around that, it would be really handy. (We don't have to actually '''do''' any assessments yet, but placing the assessment template will allow us to generate a project page of entries which use that template.) As long as our assessment template has a "stub" rating somewhere, we can use it to mark entries that need work. Does that make sense? ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 23:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |] <small>January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153</small> | |||
<br /> | |||
'''''Happy Holidays from all of us at ], and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!''' | |||
<br /><br /> | |||
'''Online events:''' | |||
* New: ] '''/''' ] '''/''' ] '''/''' ] | |||
* Continuing: ] '''/''' ] | |||
] | |||
<br /> | |||
'''Editor feedback:''' | |||
* Help us plan our future events at the ] | |||
* Join the conversations on our ] | |||
<br /> | |||
'''Social media:''' | |||
] '''/''' | |||
] '''/''' | |||
] '''/''' | |||
] | |||
<br /><br /> | |||
'''Stay in touch:''' | |||
] '''/''' ] | |||
|} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=931153048 --> | |||
== ] == | |||
: I'll modify what I just said. If someone could make a decision about the Banner templates below (fix them up aesthetically, modify the Banner to be an assessment template, etc) and then create them as separate templates linked from ], that would be ideal. Once that's done, we'll need to: 1) create a backlinks page for all entries marked with that template; 2) modify the project's base page to explain how to use that assessment template for marking entries as within the scope of our project; 3) start a separate decision about the precise assessment criteria we want to use, overlapping where possible with the criteria for ] and similar projects. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 23:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Hi. Can someone give some care and love to ] please? | |||
== Stub template creation and marking == | |||
== ] == | |||
I've ] {{tl|women-hist-stub}} and the category ]. On 11 Feb 2011, if there are no objections, this can be created as a formal stub template and stub category, and then we can start marking articles appropriately.---'''Shane Landrum''' (]) 17:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:I noticed the proposal on the stub project, I think you may be better off with something similar to ]. It will allow you to rate articles on importance as well as the class and not just that it is a stub article. I can't find a page with a description of how a wikiproject goes about creating them and using them but hopefully it's fairly easy to work out otherwise see if another wikiproject which uses a similar template can help. ] (]) 22:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:: What I think I hear you saying is that we'll be better off with an assessment-style scale for quality and/or importance rather than simply an "is this a stub or not?" marking system. That makes sense. I wonder whether it makes sense to piggyback onto ] formally-- some kind of joint task force on biographies of women, at least for the parts of ] which are biography-related. Thoughts, anyone? ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 03:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::Stubs risk deletion; nonstubs, not so much. And a way to see when women get too little coverage is vital. Assessments seem to be done by all of the WikiProjects already, so that tool or system seems widely available without having to use someone else's. Subsuming creates invisibility and lowers priority. I hope WikiProject Women's History goes forward. ] (]) 04:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
I would be grateful if some people with subject knowledge could assess the sweeping edits currently being done to that article. I'm getting the impression that this is the wholesale replacement of one interpretation with another, based on very selective sources, but I simply don't know the subject area. In any case I suspect these big deletes/replacements need some talk page discussion before being implemented. - Also notified ]. --<span style="font-family:Courier">]</span> <small>(] · ])</small> | |||
:::: Strongly agree. See my above replies to Skud (1 topic up) for next suggested steps: creating an assessment template out of the Banner template below. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 23:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== |
== GAR of Eva Perón == | ||
Let's create a banner for members to add to their User pages and for the Talk pages of articles. In honor of Shane's Cliotropic, should we use a free image of Clio as part of the logo - check these out already in Wikimedia Commons ] ] (]) 17:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Eva Perón/1}} | |||
An attempt for the group to discuss ] (]) 18:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{WikiProject Women's History}} | |||
== Women in Red January 2024 == | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |]]'''<big>]</big>''' '''|''' <small>January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296</small> | |||
<br /> | |||
'''Online events:''' | |||
* New: ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> '''|''' ] '''|''' ] | |||
* Continuing: ] '''|''' ] | |||
'''Announcement''' | |||
* In 2024 Women in Red also has a ] challenge as part <br/>of the #1day1woman initiative! | |||
'''Tip of the month:''' | |||
* ''Check out the new navigation on our ].'' | |||
'''Other ways to participate:''' | |||
* ]. You can always ]. | |||
* ]. | |||
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project. | |||
* Follow us on social media: | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] | |||
|} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1189989138 --> | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 03:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Requested move at ] == | |||
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Women in Red November 2024 == | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323</small> | |||
<br /> | |||
'''Online events:''' | |||
* ''New'': ] <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ] | |||
* ''Continuing'': ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> | |||
'''Announcements from other communities''' | |||
* Annual is an online campaign designed to boost <br>Asian content on Misplaced Pages each November. | |||
* ]. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start <br>to November's backlog drive, e.g. and | |||
'''Tip of the month:''' | |||
* ''Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at <br>'' | |||
'''Other ways to participate:''' | |||
* ]. You can always ]. | |||
* ]. | |||
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project. | |||
* Follow us on social media: | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] | |||
|} | |||
--] (] 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1254097232 --> | |||
== Requested move at ] == | |||
]]] | |||
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 19:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:*If you want an image of Clio, muse of history, why not the painting by ]? She was a painter at a time when women were rarely accepted as such. And the image probably "reads" better. ] (]) 22:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Requested move at ] == | |||
:: * I love the Gentileschi image, though I'm also aware that repeated use of images will place a larger load on the Misplaced Pages servers. Still, let's go with it; we can always change it later if the image becomes a problem. I'll work on creating a "Templates" section in the project nav bar and put some well-tweaked versions of these in it. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 22:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 14:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
:: See above discussions 1 and 2 topics up. I love the idea of a banner, and I think we'll be better off to use a banner template with assessment features built in. Feel free to pitch in on that as appropriate. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 23:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
and switching to another icon available for Clio - for a userbox (somebody needs to work on color choices!), | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Userbox-r |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#00FFFF |id=] |info=This user is a member of the WikiProject Women's History}} | |||
] (]) 17:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{-}} | |||
:::I uploaded a better version of the Gentileschi ''Clio'' for us. - ] (]) 03:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{Userbox-r |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#ffffff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#f8eaba |info-s=8 |info-fc=#000000 |id=] |info=This user is a member of the WikiProject Women's History}} | |||
{{-}} | |||
:::How about this? I think we're better off with a coherent aesthetic for the project. - ] (]) 03:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::: I like it, though I'd omit the "the". Drop that in the Templates section for people to use, if you would? ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 04:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::::Looking at ], I see that the vast majority of Project userboxes have the image on the left, so I have tweaked this a bit. Here is the current template. Let me know if any changes are needed. Place <nowiki>{{User WikiProject Women's History}}</nowiki> on your userpage to add this userbox. - ] (]) 23:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{User WikiProject Women's History}} | |||
== Women in Red December 2024 == | |||
== Template created == | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" | |||
OK, I've created a template: ] ... It's now included above, and you can include it similarly on the talk page of any women's history article. It should appropriately populate relevant categories, I hope! I'm going to experiment with it now. --] (]) 00:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | | |||
: To follow up... I've now added this to a few articles and it looks like it's working OK. I guess the next step is to plough through the epic list of articles on the project page and add it to each one. To do that, the steps are: 1) visit the article page, 2) click through to "Discussion", 3) Add a line that says "WikiProject Women's History" surrounded by two curly brackets. For example look at ]. --] (]) 01:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 </small> | |||
<br /> | |||
'''Online events:''' | |||
:: Thanks for doing that, Skud. Experienced Wikipedians who want to help: can you add some template documentation about how the quality scale works, so non-Misplaced Pages-experienced contributors will understand that not everything has to be automatically graded as a C? Ideally, I think we'd place the template on pages first with a default "unassessed" marker for quality and importance, and then agree on our assessment criteria, then make an auto-generated list of items that need assessing and items in each quality-scale category. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 04:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
* ''New'': ] <big>|</big> ] | |||
* ''Continuing'': ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> | |||
::: I don't think we need to do that yet. We can use the default quality scale, as many other projects do: In fact I'm going to copy that over to our own assessment page right now. If/when we need something more specific to our needs, we can deal with it then. --] (]) 04:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
'''Announcements from other communities''' | |||
* ] have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is<br> December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact ] or<br> ]. ] members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting | |||
'''Tip of the month:''' | |||
:: Thanks for the clear instructions, Skud. I'm fairly new to this (I'm one of those not-young-not-male contributors that are supposed to be so rare!), so I especially appreciate it. Going through the "epic list" right now, and deleting them from the project page once they have the banner (as suggested). It's pretty easy to work in batches, get a rhythm going... ] (]) 05:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Penny Richards | |||
* ''Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a ].'' | |||
'''Other ways to participate:''' | |||
::: Penny, thanks for your help; I just saw some of your work in the . This is exactly the sort of small, steady contribution that we need to make the project a success. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 06:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
* ]. You can always ]. | |||
* ]. | |||
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project. | |||
* Follow us on social media: | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] | |||
|} | |||
--] (] 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1258369059 --> | |||
== Discussion on date format == | |||
::::Wouldn't there be advantages to having the default be "unassessed"? Wouldn't that enable you then to generate a list of unassessed articles within the project, so that an individual or task force could see what needed looking at? If the default is a "C," then you don't know whether this was an automatic rating, or whether the article in fact been judged as needing some work. An alternative would be to have the default be "Start" class, which likewise doesn't imply that it's been actively evaluated. ] 14:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Hi! I have recently opened up a discussion on the date format of the article for ]. You can find it on the ]. Would like to see people's perspectives on it. Thank you! ] (]) 22:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Alliance of Women Film Journalists == | |||
:::::Cynwolfe, the default *is* unassessed. If you just type <nowiki>{{WikiProject Women's History}}</nowiki> it'll show up in ] automatically, and then we can go through and do a set of assessments in due course. (Of course if you have an opinion on an article's quality already, feel free to note it. But it's not required.) --] (]) 17:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Can someone please take a look at this article and explain/fix why the 2006 awards aren't mentioned? ] (]) 11:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Tips for New Misplaced Pages Contributors == | |||
:<small>crossposting on WikiProject Journalism and WikiProject Women's History</small> | |||
== 20% women's biographies on English Misplaced Pages == | |||
Are you new to Misplaced Pages? Got a tip to help other people out as they learn? Post it here. Step-by-step examples, like Skud's description of how to use our project's talkpage template (above, in "Template Created"), are especially helpful to many. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 06:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Hello friends, if you follow Wikiproject Women in Red you might have seen that the proportion of women's biographies on English Misplaced Pages just tipped over 20% and it's a fatastic achievement for everyone!!! I'd like to do a post on Diff (the Wikimedia Foundation's blog) about it and would love to add perspectives from this project (as well as others) - ''']'''. If you can edit it before, I'm hoping to post something 18:00 UTC on 21 Dec ] (]) 14:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== Watching pages you care about === | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
You can keep track of what people are doing on the main ] project page (or this talk page) by marking the "Watch this page" checkbox on any page you edit. Then, you can just check ] to find out what's happened recently on the pages you care about. ---'''Shane Landrum''' (] | ] | ]) 06:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Women in Red January 2025 == | |||
=== Alphabetizing === | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" | |||
I'm trying to alphabetize lists wherever possible, to avoid duplications. ] (]) 18:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Penny Richards | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ] ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 </small> | |||
<br /> | |||
'''Online events:''' | |||
* ''New'': ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ] | |||
* ''Continuing'': ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> <big>|</big> ] | |||
'''Announcements from other communities''' | |||
* Celebrate ] on Jan 15, 2025 | |||
* Participate in ] Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 | |||
'''Tip of the month:''' | |||
=== Names === | |||
* Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding <nowiki>{{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}}</nowiki> to your user page. | |||
'''Other ways to participate:''' | |||
I'm finding that a lot of entries that turn up red on the epic list actually do exist, under a different version of the name. I suppose this is always an issue, but especially so for women's names. Just a heads up to check the usual variations before putting anyone under the list of entries that need to be started. ] (]) 18:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Penny Richards | |||
* ]. You can always ]. | |||
:where there are name variants, creating ] from the name variant to the page that does exist is really useful.] (]) 19:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
* ]. | |||
:*Finding all the names for a woman and then choosing which one to use can take more time than writing an article!! Sometimes it is correct for the article name to be different from the name used on the first line of the article. The Misplaced Pages:Manual of style has a . And as Dsp13 says, making redirects from the various names can be very helpful to the reader. ]] 23:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project. | |||
::* I wish I could say I'm surprised that there's no specific policy in the section on proper names about using women's maiden-plus-married surnames as the "most complete form" they request for disambiguation in the lead. I note, for example, in the entry titled ] that she's then named more fully as "Jacqueline Lee Kennedy Onassis (née Bouvier)". Most papers collections I see in women's history archival collections carry all the creator's surnames ("Jacqueline Lee Bouvier Kennedy Onassis"). For Anglo-style married names, it's important to include the unmarried surname somewhere in the entry, and/or to have redirects from the maiden name. For a different style of name referencing, see the entry and redirects for ] ("Ida Bell Wells-Barnett"), who AFAIK published under her unmarried surname after marriage. ] (]) 13:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
* Follow us on social media: | |||
:::*Indeed this is a tricky issue since many women publish under many different names (maiden and married (more than once sometimes) and may also be most notable for other accomplishment under a different one. Sometimes there is not a clear best one so the redirects are very much needed. ]] 14:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] '''|''' | |||
] | |||
|} | |||
--] (] 17:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1265716948 --> |
Latest revision as of 19:00, 28 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's History and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 12 March 2012. |
WikiProject Women's History
Quick Menu (edit · changes)- Main · Discuss the Project
- Recognized content
- Members
- Resources
- Assessment
- Article Alerts
- Popular pages
- Templates
- Did You Know
- Featured Pictures
- In this month
- Quotes
- Ask a question
- Requested articles
- Taskforces
On 6 March 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's history. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
January 2020 at Women in Red
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Cora Sue Collins
Hi. Can someone give some care and love to Cora Sue Collins please?
Sexual slavery in Islam
I would be grateful if some people with subject knowledge could assess the sweeping edits currently being done to that article. I'm getting the impression that this is the wholesale replacement of one interpretation with another, based on very selective sources, but I simply don't know the subject area. In any case I suspect these big deletes/replacements need some talk page discussion before being implemented. - Also notified WikiProject Islam. --Elmidae (talk · contribs)
GAR of Eva Perón
Eva Perón
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisting per general consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
GA from 2006, it was't reassessed. Half of the article is unsourced, with 'This article needs additional citations for verification.' on top, 5 'citation needed' tags and two 'This section does not cite any sources' templates (Female Peronist Party and women's suffrage and Honours), see also unsourced sections: Juan Perón's arrest, 1946 presidential election, European tour, Vice-presidential nomination, Re-election and Spiritual Leader of the Nation; and 19 'page needed' tags. Artem.G (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist - Article needs a lot of work to be kept as a GA. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist per above. Needs significant work. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Good article reassessment for Joan Crawford
Joan Crawford has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Turkish Women's Football Super League#Requested move 8 October 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Turkish Women's Football Super League#Requested move 8 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe 05:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Requested move at Talk:Abigail Williams#Requested move 23 October 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Abigail Williams#Requested move 23 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 19:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Constance, Queen of Sicily#Requested move 1 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Constance, Queen of Sicily#Requested move 1 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 14:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Inanna
Inanna has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Martha Hughes Cannon
Martha Hughes Cannon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Discussion on date format
Hi! I have recently opened up a discussion on the date format of the article for Kalpana Chawla. You can find it on the Talk page. Would like to see people's perspectives on it. Thank you! Spookyaki (talk) 22:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Alliance of Women Film Journalists
Can someone please take a look at this article and explain/fix why the 2006 awards aren't mentioned? CapnZapp (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- crossposting on WikiProject Journalism and WikiProject Women's History
20% women's biographies on English Misplaced Pages
Hello friends, if you follow Wikiproject Women in Red you might have seen that the proportion of women's biographies on English Misplaced Pages just tipped over 20% and it's a fatastic achievement for everyone!!! I'd like to do a post on Diff (the Wikimedia Foundation's blog) about it and would love to add perspectives from this project (as well as others) - a draft is here, please please add to it. If you can edit it before, I'm hoping to post something 18:00 UTC on 21 Dec Lajmmoore (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Romaine Brooks
Romaine Brooks has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2025
Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Categories: