| Revision as of 21:47, 20 February 2011 editYOPbottle (talk | contribs)162 edits →I need your help← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:42, 25 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2024) (bot |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|algo = old(3d) |
|
|algo = old(15d) |
|
|archive = User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/%(year)d/%(month)d |
|
|archive = User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/%(year)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{mbox|text=If you are interested in trying ], edit the dedicated "requests" section below. Please leave bug reports and feature requests on this page. Thanks.}} |
|
|
{{mbox|text=<big>'''My off-wiki communications policy:'''</big> I prefer, to the extent possible, that all communications regarding a Wikimedia matter be done on-wiki for the sake of transparency. If there is a compelling reason why it should be done off-wiki, you may email me or talk to me on IRC, ''but'': |
|
|
#For IRC, timely, prompt, or indeed any response is '''not''' guaranteed. I stay on IRC even if I am away. If you do not get a response, you may simply send your entire inquiry (i.e., instead of "may I ask a question", ask the question!), in which case I'll treat it like emails when I come back to my computer. |
|
|
#For emails, I will try to respond as soon as I can, but real-life work obviously must take precedence, and it is easy for incoming emails to get lost after a few days. If you don't get a response within a few days, try leaving me a message on my talk page. |
|
|
#In all cases, I will respond on-wiki unless there is a compelling reason not to or you explicitly request that I keep it off-wiki. In the latter case, I reserve the right to not respond at all to the message. |
|
|
#Please do not send private or confidential information; those should be directed to the ]. }} |
|
|
{{/talkheader}} |
|
{{/talkheader}} |
|
{{/Persistent}} |
|
{{/Persistent}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Signpost'': 12 December 2024 == |
|
== ] request == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2024-12-12}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 17, manually published--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 21:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC) </div></div> |
|
In using AfCHelper, I noticed that there is no option under decline for the ], such as a blank submission. Can this be added? -- ] (] and ]) 03:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Bri@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1262352523 --> |
|
:It's near the top of that drop down box. Scroll up. ] (]) 03:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Signpost'': 24 December 2024 == |
|
::Thanks. I did not notice that. -- ] (] and ]) 03:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2024-12-24}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 18--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 00:03, 25 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div> |
|
== SPI == |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1263792399 --> |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your response at ], but as far as I can see the discussion at ] is getting nowhere because there hasn't been a completed SPI. With second or third hand partial reports from a private CU, there isn't the information available to tell the community whether there is or isn't sufficient evidence that this is another sockpuppet of the banned user. Wouldn't an SPI be the right way of answering the question? Nobody expects disclosure of what the IP address actually was, but if someone is being blocked for sockuppetry, wouldn't it be correct to have an SPI to confirm it? If, on the contrary, the SPI doesn't confirm the sockpuppetry, then at least it would be clear that the block is based on suspicion, not on the standard of evidence which the SPI process requires. I'm no expert on the SPI process, but I can't see why there has been a reluctance to use it in this case. - ] (]) 13:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Basically, an SPI adds nothing in this case. We still work from the same material: the technical evidence (which has already been disclosed on ANI) and the behavioral evidence (which still will not be posted to the SPI due to ] etc.); at best you will have another admin saying "I reviewed the behavioral evidence and concurs that this is a sock" and that's it. ] (]) 23:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Proposed result concerning Tentontunic == |
|
|
|
|
|
How does make sense? The Four Deuces and Tentontunic edit war over a POV tag, and you guys craft a remedy banning others not currently editing the article from contributing, because they were sanctioned some time in the past, regardless of whether they may have since reformed. Check the edit history, no one previously sanctioned under WP:Digwuren or WP:EEML have been editing the article for a significant period of time, yet you guys want to ban them for contributing in the future. I fail to see how that is rational or fair. --] (]) 04:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
== AE == |
|
|
First of all I really don't have any socks and thats the truth you may do the chekuser again if you wish. Second why the Passionless will not receive any topic ban though he was already convicted in edit warring on I/P articles?--] (]) 10:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:I was never convicted in edit warring before this...anyways I was just here cause I was wondering if Shrike's ARPBIA ban means no talk pages either, if it does include talk pages than he should probably be told so, asap. ] ] 11:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::Also as the topic ban wasn't lifted yet.Does it mean that Passionless have broke it?--] (]) 12:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::BTW tell us again because of what you received ARPBIA warning if not for edit warring?--] (]) 12:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::You can read all about it ], "There is no 1RR restriction on Portal:Current events or its subpages. The caution about ARBPIA is something that needs to be kept in mind by editors who work on Israel-Palestine topics on those pages."-admin, as you can see, it was only a caution and the page in question wasn't even under ARPBIA. ] ] 20:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==I need your help== |
|
|
|
|
|
Can you go on http://flags.lidicity.com/index.html to prove to ] that the anthem of Buryatia is real? Search up 布里亚特共 and tell Tonywalton that it is real on his talk page. Brian Zhao 21:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
