Revision as of 23:36, 27 February 2006 editCduser (talk | contribs)4 edits Cleaned up garbage, corrected some information.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:55, 12 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,091 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(23 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi| date = 13 May 2012 | result = '''keep''' | page = Depend }} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| | |||
{{WikiProject Brands|importance=low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=low}} | |||
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low}} | |||
}} | |||
==Untitled comment== | |||
This reads almost like a sales pamphlet that I had to google a line from it just to make sure it wasn't copied from somewhere. (The only hit that turned up was clearly taken from this article, so it seems it's not a copyvio at least.) It ''is'' informative, I just think the tone of the article needs a little work. - ] (]) 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | This reads almost like a sales pamphlet that I had to google a line from it just to make sure it wasn't copied from somewhere. (The only hit that turned up was clearly taken from this article, so it seems it's not a copyvio at least.) It ''is'' informative, I just think the tone of the article needs a little work. - ] (]) 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
:I cleaned it up just a little by removing sentence fragments, for example, "Ideal for X" becomes "They are ideal for X". However, the text gets repetitive this way ("They are this, they are that..."), so it needs to be rewritten further. Also, the article needs to be consistent about "it" versus "they" when referring to a particular item ("It does have perforated sides" versus "They do have perforated sides"). - ] (]) 03:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | :I cleaned it up just a little by removing sentence fragments, for example, "Ideal for X" becomes "They are ideal for X". However, the text gets repetitive this way ("They are this, they are that..."), so it needs to be rewritten further. Also, the article needs to be consistent about "it" versus "they" when referring to a particular item ("It does have perforated sides" versus "They do have perforated sides"). - ] (]) 03:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
== Semi-protection == | |||
====Ha==== | |||
Very funny article. A little pro-depend if you ask me. | |||
(bit of a waste of kilobytes). ] 00:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
I would like to request semi-protection for this article. Many page-blanking vandalisms have occurred. | |||
===Not funny if you have medical problems....=== | |||
== Name == | |||
I'm glad that "theonlyedge" finds victims incontinence funny. I bet he thinks quadriplegics are riot. When you're in your 20s and suddenly start bleeding from your small intestine, it's not very amusing. | |||
As I can remember, that brand used to be called ''Depends''. I wonder when it was renamed to ''Depend''. --] <small>—Preceding ] was added at 04:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Trying to figure out what an incontinence product is like when you're faced with a wide variety from each company and they're often discussed (even on the packaging) in such euphemistic terms that you have no idea what is actually in the package. I've wasted several hundred dollars purchasing useless products. | |||
== Edited == | |||
On 22 and 23Feb05, I made some major edits to remove personal jokes (again, people seem to have no understanding that incontinence is not a joke, it's a horrible condition to live with) placed in the document by 65.40.195.23, correct mistakes in the product descriptions, and remove uses for which incontinence products are not really needed. Sorry, but you don't need adult diapers for menstruation or a "wet dream". Find me a doctor who says you do and I'll put it back. | |||
I've removed the excessive descriptions unnecessary for an encyclopedic article. A basic run-down of the available products, with a brief outline of the design and intended usage is sufficient. This is NOT the place to go into details of leakguards and comparisons to other products, for eg. Before there's a slew of complaints that removing such info is discriminatory against the afflicted, balence the common sense. It is absurd to pretend that fetishism does not influence otherwise straightforward entries: basic information starts to morphs into lavish copy and user guides, and this article had been duly done. There are plenty of sites and links to provide the rest of it. PS. So why am ''I'' here? I'm a RN :) ] (]) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Depends == | |||
I may add links to other product brands later so this seems less commercial. It seems I have to write them myself, and I don't have the time right now. | |||
Count on your life with Depends!! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
This ===is=== a useful page to a lot of people. |
Latest revision as of 13:55, 12 February 2024
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2012. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled comment
This reads almost like a sales pamphlet that I had to google a line from it just to make sure it wasn't copied from somewhere. (The only hit that turned up was clearly taken from this article, so it seems it's not a copyvio at least.) It is informative, I just think the tone of the article needs a little work. - furrykef (Talk at me) 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- I cleaned it up just a little by removing sentence fragments, for example, "Ideal for X" becomes "They are ideal for X". However, the text gets repetitive this way ("They are this, they are that..."), so it needs to be rewritten further. Also, the article needs to be consistent about "it" versus "they" when referring to a particular item ("It does have perforated sides" versus "They do have perforated sides"). - furrykef (Talk at me) 03:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Semi-protection
I would like to request semi-protection for this article. Many page-blanking vandalisms have occurred.
Name
As I can remember, that brand used to be called Depends. I wonder when it was renamed to Depend. --PJ Pete —Preceding comment was added at 04:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Edited
I've removed the excessive descriptions unnecessary for an encyclopedic article. A basic run-down of the available products, with a brief outline of the design and intended usage is sufficient. This is NOT the place to go into details of leakguards and comparisons to other products, for eg. Before there's a slew of complaints that removing such info is discriminatory against the afflicted, balence the common sense. It is absurd to pretend that fetishism does not influence otherwise straightforward entries: basic information starts to morphs into lavish copy and user guides, and this article had been duly done. There are plenty of sites and links to provide the rest of it. PS. So why am I here? I'm a RN :) Plutonium27 (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Depends
Count on your life with Depends!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.229.5 (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Categories:- C-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles