| Revision as of 02:35, 28 February 2006 editArbustoo (talk | contribs)12,546 editsm →General user conduct← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022 edit undoDwaipayanc (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,440 editsm Reverted edits by 5.245.241.17 (talk) to last version by Ed6767Tag: Rollback | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|historical document}} | |||
| {{shortcut|] or ]}} | |||
| {{selfref|WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for ] (formerly WP:RFCU) or for ] (])}} | |||
| == Comment about individual users == | |||
| {{historical|type=woundup|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of ].'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.|brief=yes}} | |||
| This section is for discussing specific users who have allegedly violated ]. In order to request comment about a user, please follow the instructions to create a subpage in the appropriate section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the ] policy, belong in the '''Article content disputes''' section above. | |||
| {{info|Prior to ] at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. | |||
| ⚫ | Old RfC/Us can be found in ]. | ||
| ===Deleting uncertified user RfCs=== | |||
| }} | |||
| Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements after 48 hours from creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See ] for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained. | |||
| ===Archives=== | |||
| ⚫ | Old |
||
| === General user conduct === | |||
| Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using ] as a template, and then list it as follows: | |||
| *] – {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> | |||
| '''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold'''<br/> | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold'''<br/> | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| *] Automatically reverting contributions when he assumes a user is a sockpuppet of Jason Gastrich, even if he has no evidence, and even if the contribution doesn't support Gastrich or his web site. ] and myself have left comments on Arbustoo's talk page about his behavior, but he has ignored them and shrugged them off. His most recent response: "Just so Jason Gastrich knows, whenever I see a sock puppet adding his webpage as a citation it will be removed. Arbusto 01:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)" --] 02:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : {{vandal|Juicy Juicy}} is a sock puppet of Jason Gastrich angry that I remove his weblinks. Proof further of the AfD against him. My automatic reverts are cited on the article's talk page with the Gastrich RfC. ] 02:34, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Insistence on adding despite numerous efforts on talk page to work out solution; 3RR violations; deceptive edit summaries, impersonation, and sockpuppetry. <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 01:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * <!-- delisting pending resolution of arbcomm matter ] - User has been disruptive at the article of her husband. She has also been editing heavily the article of his employer Answers in Genesis, and the article of a colleague of her husband, Ken Ham. Many of these edits have raised concerns over POV and the appropriateness of editors editing articles that they directly have a stake in. --> | |||
| *] – multiple violations of ] on multiple vote pages; violations of ]; problems with ]. ] 12:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] - accused of persistent and constant POV pushing, personal attacks, and original research. --] 17:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Repeated pov vandal. Has been blocked several times. Problems ranging from ] to ]. Athough there has been problems with personal attacks, they are not (so far) part of this RFC, simply due to the shear amount of article-related problems.--<font color="darkgreen">]</font><font color="grey">'''|'''</font>]<font color="grey">'''|'''</font><font color="darkgreen">]</font>-- 00:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] – User had taken a break, but has now returned under an anonymous username and is continuing to promote the same activities including personal attacks and thwarting Misplaced Pages policy involving content disputes. --] | |||
| *] – - Problems with ], ], ], ], ], ], and gaming of ], etc. After conducting a multi-front revert war on the ], ], and ] articles that drove all three into protection, the user then extended his attempt to about a dozen articles related to the Plame matter, repeating the very same kinds of edits in order to cast erroneous doubt on the established facts of the case. Any editor challenging him is inevitably accused by Mr j galt of whatever it is he himself has been accused, in a classic Troll style. 22:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] – '''NOTE: The IP 65.182.172.87 has been blocked for one month as of February 6, 2006.''' User shows repeated pattern of violating ], ], and ] with talk page comments. Has repeatedly posted personally identifying information about Misplaced Pages editors despite having been told not to. - ]] <sup>(] - ])</sup> 12:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Problems with ], ], ], ], ], ], etc. (long version deleted, is listed in the actual request.) ] 17:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Problems with ], ] and ]. 22:25, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * ], POV-pushing, revert warring by United States congressional staffers, failure to work with the community, constant vandalism. ] (]) 08:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * ]: Has been harrassing other editors who disagree with him on the article ]. Any edit that refutes his view sets of a tirade of insults from this editor towards other editors. He has been repeatedly warned: ,, | |||
| But he persists with the attacks in the talk pages (most of this has been archived) and in his edit summaries. Please help. ] 04:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * ]: Mainly ], ], and ]. He has forced at least three Wikipedians to chase after every single one of his edits since April 2005. This has got to stop. -- ] (]) 18:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * ]: Various policies including ], ], ], ] and ]. - ] <sup>]]</sup>/<sub>]]</sub> ] '']'' 11:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **Now subject to a ] ]. ] 17:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Multiple violations of various policies and guidelines (], ], ], ], ], ]). ]<font color="#008000">]</font>]] 22:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: Refuses to abide by long-standing rules of current-events pages at ]. -- 03:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]: revert warring against consensus at ] and ], personal attacks. 19:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC). | |||
| *] – has made anti-gay statements as well as anti-Jewish and anti-Russian ones. Refuses to apologise. ]] ''']''' ] 22:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Constantly revert wars without discussing changes on talk. ] 17:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Using wikipedia as a blog to air dissatifaction with a company. ] 19:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Spamming, incivility, refusal to accept consensus, 3rr, and more on ] --] <sup>]</sup> 04:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] Conducting a hate campaign against users. | |||
| *] Repeatedly makes vicious personal attacks, makes unsubstantiated (and libelous) accusations of illegal behavior, vandalizes articles, and engages in edit wars. In short, a menace to the wikipedia community. | |||
| *] Gaming the system (]), assuming bad faith(]), incivil behavior (]), harassment (]), ignores consensus (]), and engages in personal attacks (]). | |||
| *] Repeated personal attacks, refusal to change course | |||
| === Use of administrator privileges === | |||
| This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by ]. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the '''General user conduct''' section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template: | |||
| *] - Allegations: {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> | |||
| As with disputes over general user conduct, '''at least two people''' must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted. | |||
| '''Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold''' | |||
| '''Approved pages - have met the two person threshold''' | |||
| *] – out-of-process deletions of images that were tagged as "fair use" but believed not to be. 22:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] – Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire. | |||
| *] - regarding attitude towards new contributors unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages. ] (] | ] | ]) 20:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] (3rd RfC) - violations of blocking and deletion policies | |||
| ''List newer entries on top'' | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022
historical document WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations (formerly WP:RFCU) or for Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names (WP:RFC/NAME) | This page has been closed down by community consensus, and is retained only for historical reference. If you wish to restart discussion on the status of this page, seek community input at a forum such as the village pump. The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion. Other dispute resolution processes should be used for conduct issues. |
 | Prior to a discussion at the Village Pump that was closed in December 2014, requests for comment on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the dispute resolution process. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. Old RfC/Us can be found in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. |