Revision as of 17:07, 25 February 2011 editGigs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,455 edits →Statement by other editor: statement← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:18, 20 May 2012 edit undoRoger Davies (talk | contribs)Administrators34,587 edits dpuble redir | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | #REDIRECT ] | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks}}</noinclude> | |||
= {{-}}{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment|Requests for amendment|]}} = | |||
⚫ | |||
== Request to amend prior case: Date delinking (Lightmouse) == | |||
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 12:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
; Case affected : {{RFARlinks|Date delinking}} | |||
; Clauses to which an amendment is requested | |||
*''']''': "Lightmouse is indefinitely prohibited from using any automation whatsoever on Misplaced Pages." | |||
*'''''': Remedy 7.1 of ], which as originally written prohibited {{User|Lightmouse}} from utilizing any automation on Misplaced Pages, is amended by adding the words "except for a bot task or group of related tasks authorized by the ]." Remedy 8, which limited Lightmouse to using a single account, is amended by adding the sentence: "He may also use a separate bot account for any bot task or group of related tasks approved by the bot approvals group." | |||
; List of users affected by or involved in this amendment | |||
* {{userlinks|Lightmouse}} (initiator) | |||
===Amendment 1=== | |||
Proposed amendment: | |||
*''']''': which said "Lightmouse is indefinitely prohibited from using any automation whatsoever on Misplaced Pages." is removed. | |||
==== Statement by your username ==== | |||
The Lightmouse non-bot account and the related bot account (Lightbot) have been dealing with units of measurement for years and have played a part in significantly improving the accessibility, consistency and more functional linking of units of measurement that we now see on Misplaced Pages. Lightbot is currently ] and there's an application to extend the scope to include inches. The workload of BAG is such that weeks have passed without a decision. | |||
BAG and Lightmouse are in the unenviable position of having to debate code scope prior to testing rather than after. It means that non-bot automated edits must be elevated to bot status or remain undone. | |||
Could I suggest that clause 7.1 be removed? This would reduce the administrative burden related to improving units of measure, which is a huge and ongoing task for Misplaced Pages. I believe it will be to the betterment of the project. | |||
==== Statement by Gigs ==== | |||
The resumption of "MOS Warrior" tactics is not an acceptable outcome here. The manual of style is a true guideline that merely offers guidance, not a set of rules to be enforced using automation. Resumption of widespread and automated "MOS enforcement" will cause a lot of unnecessary conflict. The local consensus at MOS talk pages is often not reflected on a global scale, especially when it comes to units, which are often governed by different conventions in different fields of endeavor. | |||
I remain unconvinced that Lightmouse understands that automation should only be used for truly non-controversial tasks. The correctness of a particular style is not important, what is important is whether the task is truly non-controversial. | |||
The latest amendment was generous, and should not be expanded upon at this time. ] (]) 17:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
==== Statement by other editor ==== | |||
{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.} | |||
===Amendment 2=== | |||
* Link to principle, finding of fact, or remedy to which this amendment is requested | |||
* Details of desired modification | |||
==== Statement by your username (2) ==== | |||
{Statement by editor filing request for amendment. Contained herein should be an explanation and evidence detailing why the amendment is necessary.} | |||
==== Statement by other editor (2) ==== | |||
{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.} | |||
=== Further discussion === | |||
:''Statements here may address all the amendments, but individual statements under each proposed amendment are preferred. If there is only one proposed amendment, then no statements should be added here.'' | |||
==== Statement by yet another editor ==== | |||
==== Clerk notes ==== | |||
:''This section is for administrative notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' | |||
==== Arbitrator views and discussion ==== | |||
* | |||
---- |
Latest revision as of 23:18, 20 May 2012
Redirect to: