| Revision as of 03:26, 9 March 2011 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits →Unblock: thanks← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 02:09, 26 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB |
| (455 intermediate revisions by 91 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:20px; top:10px;" class="metadata" id="administrator">]</div> |
|
{{busy}} |
|
| ⚫ |
<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:20px; top:10px;" class="metadata" id="administrator">{{click|link=Misplaced Pages:Administrators|image=Admin_mop.PNG|width=20px|height=60px|title=This user is an administrator.}}</div> |
|
|
{{User talk:Dreadstar/Talk}} |
|
{{User talk:Dreadstar/Talk}} |
|
|
|
|
| Line 6: |
Line 5: |
|
Thanks! ] <small>]</small> |
|
Thanks! ] <small>]</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==] GA nom== |
|
==Barnstar== |
|
|
|
OK, I've listed this for GA. It's the only one in it's category. Any help would be appreciated. We should look at its current state with GA-level in mind. I don't have any experience to speak of at this level, so help would be great. I think we need to expand the lead. You expressed previous interest in this so I'm letting you know. ] ] 20:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|
:the DYK had , holy cow! We made the DYK stats page! ] ] 14:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
⚫ |
::Awesome! I'll try to put in a little work on the article when I recover! If I recover, that is! :) ] <small>]</small> 21:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|
:::You OK? Or was it just the wiki-stress? (Check out my talk page, the new thermometer has done wonders for my sanity! LOL!) ]<sup>]</sup> 23:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Integrity''' |
|
|
|
::::Hey, thanks for asking! I'm doing much better now, had some pretty stressful personal issues going on that I unfortunately allowed to spill over into my contributions on Misplaced Pages; said some things on here that I shouldn't have, but hopefully nothing that will carry further now that I've paid the price for it. The thermometer may be a good idea! I'm considering if I should redesign my user pages, prolly need something to indicate a fresh, new outlook. Then again, it's really just being more of my old self; patient, calm and kind... :) I'm still in recovery mode, considering my next steps here and in RL, so, I dunno. Thanks for being there...I appreciate the support...and, I have to admit, ] <small>]</small> 01:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
|- |
|
|
|
:::::Ah, RL. Yes, doggone that darn place! It can be SUCH an interference with wiki-life! What is up with that?? (smile). I can correlate my highest WP edit count ever with two very lousy months of my RL a few years back. There is a new/old user here, ThatPeskyCommoner, who has been a wonderful addition to WPEQ and many other areas, I think she's faced some recent RL changes that brought her here, and may have some good wisdom for all of us in the integration of WP and RL. I get a kick out of her! ]<sup>]</sup> 20:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Whereas, Dreadstar has shown himself to be a member of the community distinguished for his devotion to the Misplaced Pages project; Therefore be it resolved, that this Barnstar of Integrity is affixed to his wall. <b>] ] </b> 11:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Page protection == |
| ⚫ |
:Wow, thanks Will, this really means a lot! ] <small>]</small> 03:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I noticed that you were the person who protected the ] article a month ago due to spamming, and I was wondering if you could protect it again, because the spammer appears to have returned. ] has also been repeatedly spammed by this individual, so you may want to protect that as well. Have a good one. --] (]) 17:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
== Unblock == |
|
|
⚫ |
:They look pretty stable at the moment, but I'll put them on my watchlist and try to keep an eye on them. ] <small>]</small> 21:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
Hi, I generally support Ludwigs' view and have also disagreed with QG. Just wanted to make sure you saw that although Ludwigs used a regular unblock template, that the initial block was done under ArbCom sanctions, and carried this: "Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee.". I'd like to see the block lifted as well, but not if it means you put yourself into the mess. ] (]) 03:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
| ⚫ |
:It was a very bad block and in my opinion did not properly fall under the ArbCom findings. If this goes to ArbCom, and I'm sanctined for it, so be it. ] <small>]</small> 03:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::It was certainly a debatable block at least, but since it was done under ArbCom, you might be prepared for some backlash. ] versus ] may be helpful. ] (]) 03:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thanks for the support, I was prepared for backlash when I did it. It would have nice, acutally, for the issue to have acutally been brought to ], it wasn't. ] <small>]</small> 03:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
OK, I've listed this for GA. It's the only one in it's category. Any help would be appreciated. We should look at its current state with GA-level in mind. I don't have any experience to speak of at this level, so help would be great. I think we need to expand the lead. You expressed previous interest in this so I'm letting you know. PumpkinSky talk 20:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
