Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Samurai Power Rangers: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:32, 18 March 2011 editRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:37, 9 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(18 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''NO CONSENSUS'''. Anyone who wants to merge/redirect can pursue that through normal article discussion/editing. ''']''' ('']'') 01:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}


:{{la|Samurai Power Rangers}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) :{{la|Samurai Power Rangers}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>)
Line 7: Line 13:


In addition de-prodder claimed "just only been created and arguments are invalid". ] (]) 18:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC) In addition de-prodder claimed "just only been created and arguments are invalid". ] (]) 18:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': It's a recently created stub article that has not been expanded upon yet. There is no policy on Misplaced Pages that forbids splitting off character lists from parent articles and there is certainly no mandatory length requirement on when these should be made. The subject of the article passes notability and previous articles of this type have been kept at AFD because they are completely allowed under Misplaced Pages policy. On a ], Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates ] for some yet to be explained reason.—] (]) 18:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC) *'''Keep''': It's a recently created stub article that has not been expanded upon yet. There is no policy on Misplaced Pages that forbids splitting off character lists from parent articles and there is certainly no mandatory length requirement on when these should be made. The subject of the article passes notability and previous articles of this type have been kept at AFD because they are completely allowed under Misplaced Pages policy. On a ], Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates ] for some yet to be explained reason.—] (]) 18:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
*:<nowiki>]</nowiki> Please strike your personal attack on me as I am applying WP policy ] (]) 18:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
*::What personal attack?—] (]) 18:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
*:::"On a ], Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates ] for some yet to be explained reason." That constitutes an ad hominem attack on the person by bringing behavior on annother discussion in play. I express sadness at your lack of understanding of the wikipedia policies and procedures. ] (]) 19:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
*::::Stating my thoughts on your application of policy is not a personal attack in any sense of the term. And the AFDs are related so I am most certainly allowed to mention it.—] (]) 19:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

*'''Keep''': While the article needs a lot of help at this point, it appears to be appropriate and tie into an existing franchise. ] (]) 20:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 20:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 20:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 20:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)</small>
* '''Merge with ]''': Per ] which says "Information on Misplaced Pages must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article" and ] which says "Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines". ]<small>]</small> 02:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
**This is not a stand alone list and it is not subject to the standard notability guidelines as articles have.—] (]) 17:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
It should not be deleted, every power rangers series has an article like this. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 03:37, 9 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NO CONSENSUS. Anyone who wants to merge/redirect can pursue that through normal article discussion/editing. postdlf (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Samurai Power Rangers

Samurai Power Rangers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined Prod. Prod reason was "Expansion of Power_Rangers_Samurai#Rangers that adds ranger color navigation templates. All references point at the series character descriptions and therefore not independent sources."

In addition de-prodder claimed "just only been created and arguments are invalid". Hasteur (talk) 18:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep: It's a recently created stub article that has not been expanded upon yet. There is no policy on Misplaced Pages that forbids splitting off character lists from parent articles and there is certainly no mandatory length requirement on when these should be made. The subject of the article passes notability and previous articles of this type have been kept at AFD because they are completely allowed under Misplaced Pages policy. On a similar AFD, Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates WP:CRYSTAL for some yet to be explained reason.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
    ] Please strike your personal attack on me as I am applying WP policy Hasteur (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
    What personal attack?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
    "On a similar AFD, Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates WP:CRYSTAL for some yet to be explained reason." That constitutes an ad hominem attack on the person by bringing behavior on annother discussion in play. I express sadness at your lack of understanding of the wikipedia policies and procedures. Hasteur (talk) 19:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
    Stating my thoughts on your application of policy is not a personal attack in any sense of the term. And the AFDs are related so I am most certainly allowed to mention it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Merge with Power Rangers Samurai#Rangers: Per WP:Notability which says "Information on Misplaced Pages must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article" and WP:Notability#Stand-alone lists which says "Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines". Powergate92Talk 02:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

It should not be deleted, every power rangers series has an article like this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.97.213.143 (talk) 13:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.