| Revision as of 02:57, 19 March 2011 editMoonriddengirl (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators135,072 edits →Does this kind of thing warrant a sock-drawer check?: oh, I see.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:38, 25 December 2024 edit undo50.24.236.43 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <span style="font-size: x-large;">Or: The War Room</span> | |||
| '''''Gentlemen, you can't ] in here, this is the War Room!''''' | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 11 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| |algo = old(72h) | |algo = old(72h) | ||
| |archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:MuZemike/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ⚫ | {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | ||
| <div style="background:#52A629; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px;"> | |||
| <div style="position: relative; top: 1em; background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; margin: 1em; padding: .3em;"> | |||
| ⚫ | {{User:MuZemike/ |
||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="position: relative; top: 1em; background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; margin: 1em; padding: 1em;"> | |||
| <center><big>'''Ground rules'''</big> | |||
| #Post at the bottom of the page. | |||
| #Sign your comments at the end with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>), which automatically generates your username and date posted. | |||
| #I will respond to queries here, so please watch this page. | |||
| #''']''' and chances are I will be nice back. | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="position: relative; top: 1em; background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; margin: 1em; padding: 1em;"> | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | |||
| {{archive box|auto=long|style=background-color: transparent; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; font-size=large;|bot=MiszaBot III|age=3}} | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| <br /> | |||
| <div style="position: relative; bottom: 1em; background-color: #d0f0c0; -moz-border-radius:15px; -webkit-border-radius:15px; margin: 1em; padding: 1em;"> | |||
| == ILT again == | |||
| {{anchor|ITL again}} | |||
| There's a merge discussion going on for an article brought to GA by an ITL sock. I think merging is a terrible idea until the article is checked for copyvio and completely scrubbed. Also the images should probably be stripped. Just wanted you to know. I won't be around much in the next few days, but will keep an eye on it and help if I have time when I'm back to editing. Thanks. ] (]) 06:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :ILT, actually, "ItsLassieTime". Pretty obvious that "PrestoPrestoPresto" is a sock. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 06:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks BB for pointing out the typo. Yes, Presto is certainly a sock, but that doesn't change the problems with the article ILT created. ] (]) 14:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::Lassie was well-known for that kind of thing, and anything it worked on needs to be reviewed. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 15:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thanks for letting me know. I've spent months working on their articles, scrubbing. ] (]) 15:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I think we have another one: . I'm getting very tired of keeping up with this and being chastised for it. Thanks. ] (]) | |||
| :::::Who's chastising you, besides the sock itself? If it's somebody else, let me know, and I'll go do a little bit of "chastising" back. 0:) ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 17:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :And also needs to be looked at too. Thanks. ] (]) 15:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Dover has been indefinitely blocked by Bsadowski1, and it is {{confirmed}} as ILT, and all those edits have been reverted; HistoryAAI seems {{unrelated}}. Moreover, there is no reason to feel "chastised" because you are doing the right, and this is a banned user we're dealing with. –] 16:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks. I hadn't looked at their contribs when they left a message chastising me on how the pages should be scrubbed - which understandably left me a little annoyed. Once I saw their contribs I realized it was the banned sock who was telling me how to clean their plagiarized articles. I'll take the message off my page. ] (]) 19:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == GAN Review for ] == | |||
| Hello. I came to ask for just a little assistance. I just started reviewing GA nominations recently and have done mostly smaller-scale articles, nothing too difficult. However, I am now reviewing ] and just want to see if you can look at what I have done so far and see if it all checks out. I really am wondering whether and article can be quick-failed for being too long, I made notes about that on the review page. Also I think I'm on the right track with my comments about references but just want to make sure. This review has challenged me quite a bit more than previous ones. Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Have a great day! P.S. Great job for your involvement in getting the GAN backlog elimination drive organized. '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 21:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I can maybe get to it sometime later this week or next week, failing that. –] 21:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, thanks so much! '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 21:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rosanacurso == | |||
| Hi, thanks so much for doing the CU on this. There is at least one new one. | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Macseconite | |||
| I suspect this one too, although he hasn't actually done anything wrong. | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Marialcazar | |||
| Do you have any advice on what to do with additional SPs? Do I reactivate the case? (How?) They do not seem interested at AIV in matters like this. | |||
| ⚫ | ] (]) |
||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| :Just let me know here if more pop up. –] 12:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Three}} | |||
| ⚫ | --] (]) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ::OK, thanks, I have added about 8 more since HelloAnnyong did her/his user blocking, so I suppose that at least those 8 could be blocked plus the other ones now up at SPI. Any other ideas about what to do? This seems to keep on popping up, and it is expanding to other talk pages, like for Belgium now. Do you think it could be some strange school assignment, like for an English language school in Spain? Just thinking.... ] (]) 19:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'll block them right now, but I can't check them at the moment for sleepers. –] 19:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == Does this kind of thing warrant a sock-drawer check? == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you == | |||
| Hi. . :) --] <sup>]</sup> 15:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd say that it is, as he does also create sleepers when he IP-hops, which CU will pick up. Unfortunately, what I don't have is sufficient time to sit down and go through it as well as the others in the previous SPI case. I don't know if an edit filter or some sort of IRC-tracking bot would help, but his patterns on the Sandbox is bloody obvious. –] 15:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for taking a look. :) Is he a known offender? He's only temporarily blocked; is he evading something? --] <sup>]</sup> 18:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::I wouldn't have a clue. –] 18:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oh, sorry. I thought from your note that his patterns were obvious that you meant you recognized him. :) --] <sup>]</sup> 02:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @] | |||
| == Your off wiki (IRC) communication with Iaaasi == | |||
| this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself. | |||
| are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? ] (]) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I was going through some things that you have said. Can you please help me if I got it right? | |||
| I’m still held against my will won’t someone help before they kill me, Francisco quinones Jimenez ] (]) 12:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| You posted the initial comment in Iaaasi's unblock discussion, poisoning the well, claiming he did not use sockpuppets since March. This was done following your extended IRC discussion with Iaaasi when in fact he did use many sockpuppets before March . Then you did not correct yourself when many people in the same discussion pointed this out. In the same discussion you posted which is kind of hard to determine without knowledge of the Romanian language. So I must arrive to the conclusion that you posted the above message ''at the IRC request of Iaaasi''. Then after my two sockpuppet investigations instead of being handled by random and uninvolved administrators were commented on by you ''at the IRC request of Iaaasi''. Then finally you have commented on the ban proposal among the first people again ''at the IRC request of Iaaasi''. So all in all you commented in four separate discussions at the various requests of Iaaasi did I get it right so far? ] (]) 20:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :To keep everything in one place and for transparency reasons, I have replied at the ANI page (with , as I originally intended to reply here). –] 23:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::You recently showed me this diff I was unaware of it I respond here because it's not Pertinent to ANI, First the text of the request funny how that latter part was quickly forgotten. Guess we are now on to the post-last-last chance part where the "irrevocably reblocked" should have been. Then there is the fact that it's once again an obvious IRC event (a few minutes after the talk page is re-enabled the request is posted). Just the whole issue is quite disturbing. ] (]) 01:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:38, 25 December 2024
Credit: Diego Delso
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily
Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wild Arms (video game)
Wild Arms (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you
I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @M.Bitton this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself.
are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? 109.64.104.168 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I’m still held against my will won’t someone help before they kill me, Francisco quinones Jimenez 50.24.236.43 (talk) 12:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)