Misplaced Pages

Talk:Short list: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:24, 6 April 2011 edit41.155.44.139 (talk) ←Created page with 'john lewis side by side wine cooler fridge freezeer $2,000'  Latest revision as of 07:54, 3 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,083 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
john lewis side by side wine cooler fridge freezeer $2,000
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=|
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}
}}

== long list ==

I went to Oxford in 1965 and left in 1973 (with BA and DPhil). I have spent most of my life, one way or another, in the academic world. I have never heard the phrase 'long list' and was not aware that it was even a concept, except of course by implication. In fact, I first heard the phrase in German, a language in which as one has sadly become accustomed to hear so many bizarre attempts at using English, the most spectacularly inept of which was the very short-lived 'body bag' to describe a fashion item used mostly by women (] (]) 15:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)).

== Misplaced Pages is not Wiktionary ==

That is where the simple definition of the word "shortlist" belongs.

And that's ''all'' there is to see here. --Loginnigol 20:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

It's terrible. 1 source, deep into an over-weight digression about politics. A coat rack to hang any possible usage of the word short list. A questionable dictionary definition strung out. I am certain some clever journalist or professor has written an essay about shortlists, but where. -- ]] 04:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:54, 3 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Short list article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconElections and Referendums
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

long list

I went to Oxford in 1965 and left in 1973 (with BA and DPhil). I have spent most of my life, one way or another, in the academic world. I have never heard the phrase 'long list' and was not aware that it was even a concept, except of course by implication. In fact, I first heard the phrase in German, a language in which as one has sadly become accustomed to hear so many bizarre attempts at using English, the most spectacularly inept of which was the very short-lived 'body bag' to describe a fashion item used mostly by women (Pamour (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)).

Misplaced Pages is not Wiktionary

That is where the simple definition of the word "shortlist" belongs.

And that's all there is to see here. --Loginnigol 20:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

It's terrible. 1 source, deep into an over-weight digression about politics. A coat rack to hang any possible usage of the word short list. A questionable dictionary definition strung out. I am certain some clever journalist or professor has written an essay about shortlists, but where. -- GreenC 04:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Categories: