Revision as of 06:10, 8 April 2011 editDominic (talk | contribs)Administrators29,558 edits some results and comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:35, 25 August 2017 edit undoBerean Hunter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users72,802 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Meowy/Archive | ||
(173 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | |||
{{SPIarchive notice|Meowy}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Meowy}} | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} | |||
{{SPI case status|endorse}} | |||
=====<big>07 April 2011</big>===== | |||
;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
* {{checkuser|1=Vidovler}} | |||
* {{checkuser|1=Monte Melkonian}} | |||
* {{checkuser|1=Sarmatai}} | |||
* {{checkuser|1=Mov25}} | |||
* {{checkip|1=76.237.11.246}} | |||
* {{checkip|1=76.238.245.230}} | |||
* {{checkip|1=75.51.167.26}} | |||
* {{checkip|1=76.232.254.8}} | |||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
<small>''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>"''</small> | |||
All these people came to edit when one discussion and undoing reverts began on ], ] and ], ]. I have studied contributions of ] and Scribble^3. Just look at the articles ], ] and how many times these two people used puppet users, specially when they were blocked by administrative users. The contributions of blocked people look the same with the users I am reporting to you. Can you check please? ] (]) 19:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
*'''Comment''' - {{user|Vidovler}} and {{user|Monte Melkonian}} are checkuser confirmed to be unrelated to each other: ], at least technically. ] (]) 19:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
**Checkuser does not ever disprove sock puppetry. The "unrelated" tag is a misnomer. It should say "no technical evidence". ] <sup>]</sup> 19:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
***It is true that "confirmed" and "unrelated" refer only to the strength of the IP-related evidence, and not the actual claim of sockpuppetry. By the same token, though, it is wrong to say that "unrelated" means there is no technical evidence. We have an "inconclusive" tag for that. An "unrelated" determination means that the evidence indicates that the accounts are not the same; simplified, the IPs are unrelated. There might be other overriding confirming evidence not involving the IPs, just as in a confirmed case, there might be disconfirming non-technical evidence, but that doesn't mean that there is a lack of technical evidence. ]·] 06:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
*I think something is going on here. Endorsing for clarification. — ] <sup>]</sup> 03:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{confirmed}} that ] is the currently-blocked ]. Also {{confirmed}} ] is the topic-banned ]. ]·] 06:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
---- |
Latest revision as of 11:35, 25 August 2017
Meowy
Meowy (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Meowy/Archive.