| Revision as of 07:37, 9 April 2011 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →subquestion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:25, 29 December 2024 edit undoAnomalocaris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers87,899 edits →Edit request: also center | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} | <!-- {{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} --> | ||
| {{talk header|noarchive=yes}} | {{talk header|noarchive=yes}} | ||
| {{archives | |||
| {| class="standard-talk messagebox" | |||
| | collapsed = yes | |||
| | bot = MiszaBot III | |||
| | age = 90 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archives|banner=yes|list=|small=yes|prefix=|root=}} | |||
| <!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox" | |||
| | align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | | align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | ||
| |align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why. | |align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why. | ||
| |} | |} --> | ||
| {{bots|deny=SineBot}} | {{bots|deny=SineBot,DPL bot}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 125K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 41 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| |algo = old(3d) | |||
| |algo = old(90d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| {{archives | |||
| | collapsed = yes | |||
| | bot = MiszaBot III | |||
| | age = 3 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{search archives | small=yes}} | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| == The ICC Barnstar == | |||
| == Link in ] needs fixing, please == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You deserve it. | |||
| |} | |||
| == Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
| ]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| Hello NW. Please see the section ]. | |||
| ] | |||
| In the wikitext of that section the following line needs editing: | |||
| <pre> | |||
| ''Modified ] on 21:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)'' | |||
| </pre> | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| :I'm surprised that the software doesn't account for that. {{done|Fixed}}, and thanks! '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 21:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| == Caps == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| Opps! I was going to come back for more copy edits, but I'm glad you caught my error. (I'm thinking about chopping out a lot of the lead.) Thanks.--] (]) 19:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :No worries. And I think a cut down of the lead would be well-warranted. Do let me know if you want me to lend you a hand. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 19:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| == Adding shortcut boxes to arb cases == | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| Hello NW. I've been going though some past arb cases. Nearly all of these cases have shortcuts, such as ]. Seven of them are lacking a 'shortcut box' at the head of the case, telling what the shortcut is. When a case has one, such as ], it is usually added with this syntax: <nowiki>{{shortcut|WP:ARB911}}</nowiki>. So my question is: | |||
| *Can shortcut boxes be added to the cases which have a shortcut but lack the box? | |||
| I would take care of adding these shortcut boxes if is kosher to do so. Cases that have a shortcut but lack the boxes are: | |||
| ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Thanks, ] (]) 16:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :You know, if you were just willing to become a clerk, you wouldn't have for permission to update case pages every time <tt>:)</tt><p>But yes, feel free to add the shortcut boxes. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 17:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| == No R&I comment allowed? == | |||
| ] | |||
| I saw that Ludwigs2 should not be talking about R&I in a current Arbcom case. Is he under a restriction? Thanks, ] (]) 23:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :R&I was just becoming too much of a dramafest, and at best it was only tangentially related to the AE case. So I banned mention of it, hoping to preserve some decorum. Not sure how well that worked out. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 01:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, and subsequently the two drafting members of ArbCom, Coren and Risker. ] (]) 13:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| == AE case == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Hi NuclearWarfare. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| On your talk page, some time back Ludwigs2 made threats that I could not participate in this ArbCom case. He has exhibited extremely poor conduct before and during the case and now his request, transferred to the talk page of the workshop, is a further example. I have carefully avoided using any statements or diffs that might directly concern me. His attempted procedural disruption will result in further evidence being added and a far more severe admonishment. Xxanthippe does bear a grudge. In a previous case she argued that I should be indefinitely banned from wikipedia; so far, although vociferous, she has been unable to support any of her arguments with diffs. From my perception, this is a repeat performance of the same type of disruption that initiated the case. What undercuts the logic of Ludiwgs2 is that this request has been made '''one month into the case''' without any evidence. I already complained to you be email that Ludwigs2 was behaving inappropriately in my proposals section. The disruptive request he has made at the moment is a heightened version of that. Other editors have referred to his penchant for intimidation and bullying. I don't see much difference here. | |||
| == Edit request == | |||
| As you requested, I will not add anything during this UTC day to the case, but I might send an email response to the whole of ArbCom. I am busy preparing my last evidence for the Noleander case: it is quite time-consuming. ] (]) 07:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I note also that the arbitrator JvdB moved Ludwigs2's comments to the "parties" section in my "proposed findings" section, which was the subject of my previous email requests. So at least that is resolved. This seems to be another unjustified personal attack by Ludwigs2. What he claims certainly has no correlation whatsover with my editing history since 2006. ] (]) 07:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::This is to confirm that I have emailed all members of ArbCom, active on the AE cae, with a message. I have sent a copy to you and the other clerk active on the case. Please feel free to copy it to any other clerks if you consider it appropriate. Thanks, ] (]) 08:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::In a reply to you on his talk page, Ludwigs2 wrote, "As I said, at this point Mathsci has nothing pleasant to say to or about me, and I have no respect for him as an editor or a human being." That diff has also been passed on to ArbCom. ] (]) 08:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change<br/> | |||
| ===subquestion=== | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></nowiki></code> | |||
| Can I respond to the workshop talk page thread about creating an interaction ban, or should I wait? I'd like to ask a couple of questions so that I can move ahead on that appropriately, but I suspect if I try ] will huff and puff again. --] 18:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <br/>to<br/> | |||
| :Please wait. If you think it is still warranted after the time I gave runs out, you are free to create a request ]. I would just hold off entirely though. I was informed that a proposed decision will go up this weekend, and comments now are unlikely to change it drastically. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 18:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></span></nowiki></code> | |||
| ::Well, this is really unrelated to this case, but part of a longer-standing problem that I'd like to resolve between Mathsci and myself, but yeah that's ok. I can contact individual people in their talk pages if necessary. thanks. --] 19:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ludwigs2 is a party in this ArbCom case, one whose statements on ] were a significant factor in the initiation of this ArbCom case. That he now is seeking action against another user who has examined his recent edits during that case is unprecedented and unreasonable. He seems at present to be disrupting wikipedia to make a ]. ] (]) 20:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Whatever. just as FYI, I've decided to open up an entirely separate request for amendment on the R&I ruling to deal with this problem. That's the proper place for it, anyway. Mathsci, I'll notify you when I've completed it - probably over the weekend. --] 03:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Apparently Mathsci doesn't feel constrained by your request, and continues looking for away to attack me in the case. I'm not complaining, or suggesting you take action; I just want you to see the flaw in Mathsci's character, and why I get so frustrated with him. please notice that I'll continue to let this drop, and remember it the next time you're inclined to take his side (should that ever be the case after this). --] 06:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{you've got mail}} | |||
| that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! ] (]) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Tim Ball == | |||
| :Also, please make two other changes. The {{tag|center|o}} tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed {{tag|center|o}} tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after <code><nowiki>{{Babel|en-5|es-1}}</nowiki></code>, lease remove <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki></center></nowiki></code> and change <code><nowiki>|400px]]</nowiki></code> to <code><nowiki>|center|400px]]</nowiki></code>. Thank you for your cooperation. —] (]) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, NW, You closed on the ] of the article on Tim Ball, an astonishing move from my perpective. Michael Mann is presently against him, and the conservative Canadian online newspaper he wrote for his ditched him after they retracted and apologized for an article he wrote slandering Anthony Weaver. Do you think that, on top of all his activism over the years, he is notable enough for a BLP? Not as a crank, but as a climate change denier. I can't imagine Michael Mann would bother to sue someone insignificant. ] (]) 10:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi Yopienso. I brought that closure to Deletion review, ]. If you want to recreate it, you have to show that sources and consensus have changed. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 13:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't think a BLP supported primarily by negative information would fly. ] (]) 14:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::Error above: should read, "Not as an ''academic'', but as a climate. . ." | |||
| :::Thanks to both for your responses. Yes, Deletion review, it was. | |||
| :::Hmmm. We have lots of BLPs on people who have been taken to court; they are built almost entirely on negative information. Of course, Ball is not doing physical or economic harm to anyone, and his attempts to damage reputations have utterly backfired. | |||
| :::As nearly as I can tell, the reason there's no BLP on Ball is because of a belief that having one would enhance his status, and the consensus is to avoid that. Imo, this verges on censorship, but I respect the will of the majority. ] (]) 19:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:25, 29 December 2024
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
The ICC Barnstar
|
The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit | |
| You deserve it. |
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of National Association of Colleges and Employers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Association of Colleges and Employers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/National Association of Colleges and Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Sdkb 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request
Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change
<span class="plainlinks">
to
<span class="plainlinks"></span>
that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! Zinnober9 (talk) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, please make two other changes. The
<center>tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed<center>tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply<center>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after{{Babel|en-5|es-1}}, lease remove<center>and</center>and change|400px]]to|center|400px]]. Thank you for your cooperation. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)