| Revision as of 15:08, 6 March 2006 editSiva1979 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,266 edits →[]: delete vote← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:17, 16 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''Delete'''. ] 20:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Partly a how-to guide for a non-notable cocktail, and partly a vanity article on Durham University students. Not encyclopedic material as it's ], ] and ]. '''Delete'''. ] 13:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | Partly a how-to guide for a non-notable cocktail, and partly a vanity article on Durham University students. Not encyclopedic material as it's ], ] and ]. '''Delete'''. ] 13:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' as original research, unverifiable, vanity and last of all, Misplaced Pages is not a cookbook. --]]</ |
*'''Delete''' as original research, unverifiable, vanity and last of all, Misplaced Pages is not a cookbook. --]]]] 14:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *<s>'''Delete'''</s> non-notable, zero ghits. The article seems familiar; is it maybe recreation of deleted material (and thus speedily deletable)? ] 14:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *<s>'''Delete'''</s> non-notable, zero ghits. The article seems familiar; is it maybe recreation of deleted material (and thus speedily deletable)? ] 14:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Speedy delete''' as recreation of previously deleted material: ]. ] 14:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | :*'''Speedy delete''' as recreation of previously deleted material: ]. ] 14:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' College students mixing a bunch of spirits together and getting really, really drunk on the mix is <u>not</u> notable, and there is no point in cataloging the endless possible combinations they might use. ] 15:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' College students mixing a bunch of spirits together and getting really, really drunk on the mix is <u>not</u> notable, and there is no point in cataloging the endless possible combinations they might use. ] 15:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above. --< |
*'''Delete''' per above. --<span style="background:gold;">]]</span>] 15:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above. Heh, Fan-1967, hillarious comment. -- ] 15:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Comment''' I went to college, too. Believe it or not, even back during the Ford administration, we got drunk on ridiculous mixtures of awful stuff, and they hadn't even discovered Jagermeister yet. Not notable then or now. ] 15:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', vanity, OR, unverifiable... sounds like a poor man's Long Island iced tea. --<span style="font-family:Book Antiqua;">] ]/]</span> 21:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per well argued nomination. ]]]] 23:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:17, 16 March 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Morals mangler
Partly a how-to guide for a non-notable cocktail, and partly a vanity article on Durham University students. Not encyclopedic material as it's original research, not verifiable and vanity. Delete. Sliggy 13:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as original research, unverifiable, vanity and last of all, Misplaced Pages is not a cookbook. --Terence Ong 14:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Deletenon-notable, zero ghits. The article seems familiar; is it maybe recreation of deleted material (and thus speedily deletable)? Weregerbil 14:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted material: Morals Mangler AfD. Weregerbil 14:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete College students mixing a bunch of spirits together and getting really, really drunk on the mix is not notable, and there is no point in cataloging the endless possible combinations they might use. Fan1967 15:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Siva1979 15:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Heh, Fan-1967, hillarious comment. -- Alpha269 15:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I went to college, too. Believe it or not, even back during the Ford administration, we got drunk on ridiculous mixtures of awful stuff, and they hadn't even discovered Jagermeister yet. Not notable then or now. Fan1967 15:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity, OR, unverifiable... sounds like a poor man's Long Island iced tea. --Kinu /c 21:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
(UTC)
- Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 23:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.