Revision as of 21:51, 6 March 2006 editEncyclopedist (talk | contribs)9,098 edits →[]: wk← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:25, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
<!-- | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result of the debate was '''Keep''' ] <small>] • ]</small> 01:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
I'm moving this from Prod to AfD because I think the band has at least a ''case'', although not a strong one, but maybe I'm missing something. I wrote this article, but only in the process of researching the ''real'' ], and I neither know nor care anything about the band. But they do have two albums out (albeit at least the first was self-published), they have received good reviews (but not, apparently, in really major mags), and they did do the music for a Netscape ad (wheeee). Basically, if there's anyone from Portland that knows anything about this band? Maybe they are better-known than they appear to be, or something. ] 00:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | I'm moving this from Prod to AfD because I think the band has at least a ''case'', although not a strong one, but maybe I'm missing something. I wrote this article, but only in the process of researching the ''real'' ], and I neither know nor care anything about the band. But they do have two albums out (albeit at least the first was self-published), they have received good reviews (but not, apparently, in really major mags), and they did do the music for a Netscape ad (wheeee). Basically, if there's anyone from Portland that knows anything about this band? Maybe they are better-known than they appear to be, or something. ] 00:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 4: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Neutral''', as nominator. They really do seem to be on the bubble.] 00:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Neutral''', as nominator. They really do seem to be on the bubble.] 00:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''', they seem to pass ]. ]]]<nowiki>ash</nowiki>] ] 00:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', they seem to pass ]. ]]]<nowiki>ash</nowiki>] ] 00:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per ]. ] 01:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per ]. ] 01:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per other users voting keep. —] | ] 01:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per other users voting keep. —] | ] 01:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' Two albums on Atlantic passes ]. -- ] ∙ <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> ] 01:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Two albums on Atlantic passes ]. -- ] ∙ <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> ] 01:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per major-label release. WTF is with that "Picture not available" thing, though? ] - <b>< |
*'''Keep''' per major-label release. WTF is with that "Picture not available" thing, though? ] - <b><span style="color:#FF0000;">St</span><span style="color:#FF5500;">ar</span><span style="color:#FF8000;">bli</span><span style="color:#FFC000;">nd</span></b> 02:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' as per Royboycrashfan, meets the criteria set by ]. ] 09:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' as per Royboycrashfan, meets the criteria set by ]. ] 09:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' as it passes criteria of ]. --]]</ |
*'''Keep''' as it passes criteria of ]. --]]]] 10:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per above. -- ] 14:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per above. -- ] 14:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per above. --< |
*'''Keep''' per above. --<span style="background:gold;">]]</span>] 14:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' and make a disambiguous page] 18:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' and make a disambiguous page] 18:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Weak keep''' on the brink of "delete". ]]]] 21:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Weak keep''' on the brink of "delete". ]]]] 21:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per Atlantic Records releases. --] <small>(])</small> 00:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> |
Latest revision as of 16:25, 6 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 01:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Echo Helstrom (band)
I'm moving this from Prod to AfD because I think the band has at least a case, although not a strong one, but maybe I'm missing something. I wrote this article, but only in the process of researching the real Echo Helstrom, and I neither know nor care anything about the band. But they do have two albums out (albeit at least the first was self-published), they have received good reviews (but not, apparently, in really major mags), and they did do the music for a Netscape ad (wheeee). Basically, if there's anyone from Portland that knows anything about this band? Maybe they are better-known than they appear to be, or something. Herostratus 00:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral, as nominator. They really do seem to be on the bubble.Herostratus 00:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, they seem to pass WP:MUSIC. Royboycrashfan 00:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NMG. PJM 01:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per other users voting keep. —Eternal Equinox | talk 01:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Two albums on Atlantic passes WP:MUSIC. -- Samir ∙ C 01:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per major-label release. WTF is with that "Picture not available" thing, though? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per Royboycrashfan, meets the criteria set by WP:MUSIC. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as it passes criteria of WP:MUSIC. --Terence Ong 10:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. -- Alpha269 14:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --Siva1979 14:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and make a disambiguous pageJohnRussell 18:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep on the brink of "delete". εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 21:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Atlantic Records releases. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 00:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.