Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Endopanerium: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:54, 6 March 2006 editEncyclopedist (talk | contribs)9,098 edits []: d← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:39, 2 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''delete''' ridiculous made-up neologism. --] <span style="font-size: 80%">(])</span> 14:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
*'''Delete'''. neologism without any evidence of widespread use. Prod removed without reason--] 06:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. neologism without any evidence of widespread use. Prod removed without reason--] 06:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Line 5: Line 11:
*'''Delete''' protologism, ''A proposed name'' ] 06:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' protologism, ''A proposed name'' ] 06:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Neologism. -- ] ∙ <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> ] 07:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Neologism. -- ] ∙ <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> ] 07:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as neologism. --]]</font>]] 11:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as neologism. --]]]] 11:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above. -- ] 15:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per above. -- ] 15:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per well argued nomination. ]]]] 22:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per well argued nomination. ]]]] 22:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 14:39, 2 April 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete ridiculous made-up neologism. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Endopanerium

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.