Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Five little speckled frogs: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:49, 7 March 2006 editAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits []: delete← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:07, 14 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''keep''' (no consensus), although I note that nobody mentioned that the article contains hardly anything else than the lyrics. ] ] 10:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
'''Delete''' not notable song. ] 22:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC) '''Delete''' not notable song. ] 22:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' famous nursery rhyme. 16,000 Google hits even with quotes around it. ] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 23:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' famous nursery rhyme. 16,000 Google hits even with quotes around it. ] - <b><span style="color:#FF0000;">St</span><span style="color:#FF5500;">ar</span><span style="color:#FF8000;">bli</span><span style="color:#FFC000;">nd</span></b> 23:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' ] 02:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' ] 02:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Yes it's ]. But how/why is it ] or ] enough to warrant an article? Contains no content other than the rhyme (unencyclopedic). --&nbsp;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 02:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Yes it's ]. But how/why is it ] or ] enough to warrant an article? Contains no content other than the rhyme (unencyclopedic). --&nbsp;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 02:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. But I can't make sense of the notability other nursery Rhymes we have here. ] gets 307 google matches and we have an article for it, while ] has 47,600 google matches and we don't have an article for it. Can someone comment on what criteria is being used on the ] page? ] 02:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. But I can't make sense of the notability other nursery Rhymes we have here. ] gets 307 google matches and we have an article for it, while ] has 47,600 google matches and we don't have an article for it. Can someone comment on what criteria is being used on the ] page? ] 02:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', established nursery rhyme. ] 03:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''', established nursery rhyme. ] 03:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
**''"] a mere collection of public domain or other source material."'' --&nbsp;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 01:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' nn -- ] 00:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' nn -- ] 00:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 04:07, 14 April 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus), although I note that nobody mentioned that the article contains hardly anything else than the lyrics. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Five_little_speckled_frogs

Delete not notable song. Mahanchian 22:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.