Misplaced Pages

User talk:SarekOfVulcan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:52, 28 April 2011 editKuru (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators203,976 edits →Avanu block: sigh.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:11, 27 December 2024 edit undoSarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators51,686 edits rm signposts 
Line 1: Line 1:
] ]
]

'''''Note:''' if I've made a clearly bad block, such as something that appears to be vandalism at first glance but actually has a good explanation, please unblock without waiting for me to come back online. If it's something less clear, please at least get consensus on AN/I first. Thanks.''
{{troutme}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}} {{archive box|auto=yes}}
<center> <center>
{| id="toc" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;" {| id="toc" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;"
! align="left" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" | Please add new comments in . Thanks. ] ! align="left" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" | Please add new comments in . Thanks.
|} |}
{{User:TParis/RfX_Report}}
</center> </center>

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived.
If further archiving is needed, see ].


{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{atnhead}} |archiveheader = {{atnhead}}
|maxarchivesize = 64K |maxarchivesize = 128K
|counter = 32 |counter = 26
|minthreadsleft = 10 |minthreadsleft = 10
|algo = old(7d) |algo = old(7d)
Line 20: Line 20:
}} }}


== Deletion review for ] ==


An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> {{unsigned2|12:56, February 14, 2011|Leandrod}}


== Wendy Carlos Reversion ==
== Vandalism of ] article ==


Hi SarekOfVulcan
You have inaccurately suggested that I am engaging in "warring" after attempting to undo repeated vandalism of the above referenced article by a clearly biased editor who apparently knows little or nothing about the history covered by this article. I thought article vandalism was not allowed by Misplaced Pages. It would appear that you may be taking sides with a clearly biased editor who is engaging in article vandalism without careful review of the substance of deleted and contributed content for this article and the ] article. Is that the case? The same editor who has waged a campaign to degrade this article also recently tried to delete the entire ] article and was reversed for that attempted sabotage. That evidence of the editor's pattern of frivolous and improper deletion of verifiably accurate content should properly be taken into account when weighing the merit of that editor's editing of this article.
You reverted my research on Wendy Carlos based on ancestry.com and archives.com, however these websites are based on information from official US documents, so what's the issue? ] (]) 21:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
== April 2011 ==


Hello,
Regarding your comment: Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Misplaced Pages's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
:: Hello. I did not receive a reply to my earlier question (above) about the continuing vandalism of the ] article. Novaseminary has engaged in what you call canvassing to recruit involvement of other editors to support her biased viewpoint concerning Baptists and possibly other subjects. I notice you issued a warning to me and not to her. Why is that? My contributions are not indiscriminately posted at all. You have also deleted project improvement tags on the discussion page for this very poorly developed article. You asked about the relevance of the constitutional, historical, Jewish and Christian dimensions of the history of the colony. All of that was in a stage of improving development until Novaseminary improperly deleted content from the article just as she improperly deleted content from the ] article. Have you reviewed the content deleted by Novaseminary before deciding to remove those content improvement tags? It seems very clear that this article has been vandalized through erroneous deletions when it is in need of improvement and expansion. Thanks for your guidance on this.


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
== FYI ==


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
Per your comment at C&A, AFL already has its own article. - ] (]) 16:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
:Good point. Copied that back into the article and cleaned it up a bit.--] (]) 18:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
== ADHD RFC ==


Kind Regards,
Go for it. ] (]) 19:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


]
Peachy. ] (]) 20:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== Medical images ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


== Administrators' newsletter – November 2024 ==
It might be a good idea to get some consensus at ] before you continue deleting images from pages. ] (] · ] · ]) 22:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


] from the past month (October 2024).
== Archived RS/N edited again by User:Dlabtot ==


]
On 27 October 2010 you that had been subjected to post-closure editing by ]. While recently attempting to review that RS/N on the subject of World Net Daily's WP:RS status, I noted that User:Dlabtot, subsequent to what should have been your final resolution to his previous breach of WP guidelines for archived content, , this time to an unreadable status except by horizontal scrolling (he left a hanging "}".


] '''Administrator changes'''
While I believe that User:Dlabtot's persistent and demonstrated unwillingness to abide by even administrative intervention on this issue should be cause for sanctions, I'll leave that to your discretion but would appreciate your consideration and restoration of the archive to pre-User:Dlabtot's post-archive editing. ] has been notified of this communication. Thanks. ] (]) 12:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
:Restored the archive, but not taking any further action since that last edit was 5 months ago. --] (]) 13:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
|]
::Thanks for your consideration. ] (]) 14:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
}}
::: JakeInJoisey, please don't post any more 'courtesy notices' on my talk page. You are welcome to pursue your wrong-headed vendetta against me, ask admins to ban me, whatever. I'm just not interested. Please leave me alone. ] (]) 03:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
== Protection of Elizabeth Sladen ==
:] ]


] '''Oversighter changes'''
Please undo this. I strongly object. The article is currently being discussed and developed and is not the target of heavy vandalism, we don't do pre-emptive protections. There's no basis for this.--] 18:56, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
:] ]
: Considering how many people jumped in and made that change based on the episode already, I have _strong_ objections to unprotecting before The Impossible Astronaut airs in the majority of US time zones. (Has it aired in Australia yet?) --] (]) 18:59, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
::However, if you feel strongly enough to revert it yourself, I won't consider it wheel warring. --] (]) 19:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
::Well, the article is receiving many helpful edits, and stifling them is inappropriate. So, some people change the dob, we revert. It really isn't a lot of work, nor is it a serious problem if it is wrong for a few hours. There's no vandalism and no basis in policy for your protection. If you want it protected, please get a consensus.--] 19:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Please note that '''every edit today''' was to the birthdate, in one direction or another. The majority of them came after The Impossible Astronaut aired using her claimed birthdate instead of her recorded one. Have fun reverting.... --] (]) 19:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
== Silence AfD ==
* Following a ], the ] proposal that went for a trial to refine the ] (RfA) process has been discontinued.
* Following a ], ] is adopted as a policy.


] '''Technical news'''
] Thanks. <font color="#FFB911">╟─]]►]─╢</font> 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
* Mass deletions done with the ] tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. {{phab|T366068}}


] '''Arbitration'''
:You seemed to be opposed to the first sentence of the edit about the lodger episode. Are you telling me that a plot description of the only episode where the creatures appear is OR? ] (]) 16:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
* {{noping|RoySmith}}, {{noping|Barkeep49}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the ] for the ]. {{noping|ThadeusOfNazereth}} and {{noping|Dr vulpes}} are reserve commissioners.
::Replied on article talk. --] (]) 16:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
* Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the ].
* The Arbitration Committee is ] for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
] '''Miscellaneous'''
* An ] is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. ]


----
:::Please respond to my further question:
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1254686817 -->


== AN - Ban == == Revert question ==


Hi, I was wondering if you go into a little more detail on why you reverted my edits on changing to outgoing rather than incumbent. The reason why I put those in is because a new president and vice president has just been elected so since they are leaving office soon, putting them as a lame duck seems to make the most sense. I'd be willing to hear your arguments on keeping the incumbent on both the president and VP pages. I'm not sure if there was a time that we used the term outgoing for politicians leaving office, but it just doesn't make sense to keep incumbent there. ] (]) 16:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Hey Sarek,
Just noticed the ban you proposed on AN. Only had time to look at "current" talk page of the user. Has anyone tried to talk to him/her about these stubs he's creating? Maybe if he was clued in he'd understand a bit better, and work on things in his user space first, then roll them out once they had a bit more meat to them. Just wondering. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 15:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
:He removes it and discusses it on the other person's talkpage. Check the history. --] (]) 15:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


:But they are the incumbents. We don't need any further editorializing. Leave that to the headline writers. --] 16:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
::And he does that because he doesn't want negative comment on his talk page - see ] to see him say this. It is as if he is trying to deflect attention or something, but who knows what his objection to negative comment is. Most if not all of us get it from time to time and the vast majority live without going to these lengths (although I know some who blank their pages, esp. IPs).


== Books & Bytes – Issue 65 ==
::How long do I have to form an opinion on the topic ban proposal? I need to think, even though I have suggested a moratorium on creation of new NHRP articles by him. - ] (]) 18:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
:::Until consensus is clear, basically. Not less than 24 hours, usually, but given that it's unanimously against the proposal at this time, it might be ] closed. I'd suggest posting something to the effect of "tentative support, but still considering" until you make your final decision. --] (]) 18:21, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
<div style="font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px;">
]</div>
<div style="line-height: 1.2;">
<span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''The Misplaced Pages Library''': ''Books & Bytes''</span><br />
Issue 65, September – October 2024
</div>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em;">
* Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Misplaced Pages Library
* Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
* Tech tip: Mass downloads
<big>''']'''</big>
</div>
</div>
<small>Sent by ] on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9 (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=27730094 -->


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
== Speed Printing ==


Hello,
The move of ] was not exactly uncontroversial. I had previously moved it to ] because there's no other article using that title. I was hoping to see how the discussion would develop. But not that big a deal I suppose. ] (]) 23:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
:I was considering leaving it there for further discussion, especially in light of the "disambig" page he created to support it, but when I checked Google, there were too many other companies using the name for me to feel comfortable with leaving it at the undisambiguated title. Now, if you want to open a RM to get it back there, be my guest -- I would be interested in seeing if there's consensus for the other title, but not interested enough to open the discussion myself. --] (]) 01:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
::I kind of feel the same. The movereq is still open techically, so I think I'll leave it for now and see if anyone responds. If no one does, I'll just redirect Speed Printing, unless you object, since doncram says in his movereq he wouldn't mind that. ] (]) 02:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Oy. Can't believe I forgot to close the movereq.... Fixed, thanks. --] (]) 02:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
== Elisabeth Sladen excess HTML comments ==


Take the survey ''''''.
I see you have removed the comments I placed before the dates here in pursuance of an idea I had that editors get to the date and don't read any further before changing it. I think it will be interesting to see what now happens, and whether the current comments are enough. ] (]) 17:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
:Well, I don't think they will be enough, but I don't think 3 will be enough, either. :-) So, might as well go with the principle of least annoyance. :-) (Check the history of ] for similar frustrations....) --] (]) 17:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
::Regrettably you seem to have a reasonably watertight argument there (!) ] (]) 17:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
== Maine Question 1 ==


]
You're right; ] is currently a redirect page. Are you able to delete that page and move the article to it? Or is there a better solution? ] (]) 14:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
:I don't know if there's a better solution. Maybe we should bring it up on Talk:SSMinME and see? --] (]) 14:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
::Or maybe there's an elections WP that has some sort of standards for this. *runs off to check* --] (]) 14:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
==Elisabeth Sladen==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
You seem to have reverted her DOB to Was this deliberate? ] (]) 19:34, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
:Yes, because that was someone else's comment, apparently showing the state of the article at that time. --] (]) 19:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
I thought it might be afterward, triumph of enthusiasm over concentration there. ] (]) 19:37, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – December 2024 ==

] from the past month (November 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''Interface administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] ]

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
==Incomplete unblock?==
* Following ], the ] has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the ] within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
Hello, I notice you posted <span class=plainlinks> to ], indicating you had unblocked them. However, </span>, the user is still blocked. I wasn't sure if this was intentional, or perhaps a momentary glitch in a tool, such as Twinkle, which is why I thought I'd point it out. :) Just a friendly heads up. <sup>]</sup>]</sub><small> @ 22:11, 23 Nisan 5771 / 27 April 2011 (UTC)</small>
* Following a ], a new speedy deletion criterion, ], has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.
:Momentary glitch in brain, I think. Thanks very much!--] (]) 22:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


] '''Technical news'''
== ] ==
* Technical volunteers can now register for the ], which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.


] '''Arbitration'''
Could you do the honours with this sock. ]] 22:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
* The arbitration case '']'' (formerly titled '']'') has been closed.
* An arbitration case titled '']'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.


----
== Avanu block ==
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1259680487 -->


== WP:ANI ==
Sarek, I beg you to reconsider your block of Avanu since you were quite clearly involved in the edit war, and on the opposite side as Avanu - . Unblocking and leaving the matter to an uninvolved admin would be the right thing to do. Cheers.] (]) 01:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Please, don't start an . If you have what to say, do it ], until the question is solved. --] (]) 17:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:Kuru offered to reblock Avanu while declining his unblock request. How about unblocking and letting Kuru reblock so that the matter is settled?] (]) 01:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
::Fun. I can pad my block count! ] ] 01:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Last time I took ownership of a block, I just unblocked and reblocked myself -- no coordination needed. :-) --] (]) 01:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
::::Kuru's offer and the note above were sarcasm. I'll use the <dry wit> tags next time. ] ] 01:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:11, 27 December 2024

Note: if I've made a clearly bad block, such as something that appears to be vandalism at first glance but actually has a good explanation, please unblock without waiting for me to come back online. If it's something less clear, please at least get consensus on AN/I first. Thanks.


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.
Please add new comments in new sections, e.g., by clicking here. Thanks.
RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online


Wendy Carlos Reversion

Hi SarekOfVulcan You reverted my research on Wendy Carlos based on ancestry.com and archives.com, however these websites are based on information from official US documents, so what's the issue? Egrabczewski (talk) 21:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Revert question

Hi, I was wondering if you go into a little more detail on why you reverted my edits on changing to outgoing rather than incumbent. The reason why I put those in is because a new president and vice president has just been elected so since they are leaving office soon, putting them as a lame duck seems to make the most sense. I'd be willing to hear your arguments on keeping the incumbent on both the president and VP pages. I'm not sure if there was a time that we used the term outgoing for politicians leaving office, but it just doesn't make sense to keep incumbent there. Interstellarity (talk) 16:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

But they are the incumbents. We don't need any further editorializing. Leave that to the headline writers. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

The Misplaced Pages Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

  • Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Misplaced Pages Library
  • Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
  • Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Please, don't start an edit war. If you have what to say, do it here, until the question is solved. --Tamtam90 (talk) 17:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Category: