Misplaced Pages

2006 Singapore elitism controversy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:11, 4 May 2011 editLa goutte de pluie (talk | contribs)22,509 editsm moved Wee Shu Min Elitism Views to Wee Shu Min elitism scandal over redirect: "scandal" is used in articles such as Watergate scandal, plus rm pompous capitalisation← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:32, 10 November 2024 edit undoToughpigs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users72,932 edits take out cat, meme is not mentioned in the article 
(47 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}}
⚫ The '''Wee Shu Min elitism scandal''' was a ]an scandal in October 2006 in which Wee Shu Min, daughter of ] ] and a then-eighteen year-old student on ]'s scholarship programme, found herself in controversy after posting on her ] what were viewed by some Singaporeans to be ],<ref name="satrev">''"Time to learn that sorry isn't the hardest word to say"'', Ong Soh Chin, ] (Saturday Review), 28 October 2006, p. S10</ref> naïve, and insensitive statements against heartlanders.<ref name="shuminblog">''"Teen blogger counselled for her 'elitist' remarks"'', Ken Kewk, ], October 24, 2006, p. H5</ref>
{{Use British English|date=January 2012}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2020}}
⚫ The '''Wee Shu Min elitism controversy''' occurred in October 2006 in ]. Wee Shu Min, daughter of ] ] and a then eighteen-year-old student on Raffles Junior College's Humanities scholarship programme, found herself in controversy<ref>{{cite web|last=Ken Kwek|first=Aaron Low|title=Internet users learning netiquette the hard way|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/Free/Story/STIStory_142321.html|work=The Straits Times|location=Singapore |access-date=25 July 2007}}</ref> after posting on her blog what were viewed by some Singaporeans to be ],<ref name="satrev">''"Time to learn that sorry isn't the hardest word to say"'', Ong Soh Chin, ] (Saturday Review), 28 October 2006, p. S10</ref> naïve, and insensitive statements against heartlanders.<ref name="shuminblog">''"Teen blogger counselled for her 'elitist' remarks"'', Ken Kewk, ], 24 October 2006, p. H5</ref>


Dismissing the who voiced concerns on ] and ] on his blog, she shot back with a take-no-prisoners diatribe,<ref name="satrev" /><ref name="zbedit">''"“精英”博客的省思"'', 社论观点, ], 31 October 2006 (Chinese)</ref> calling Derek a ''"stupid crackpot"'', belonging to ''"the sadder class"'' and overreliant on the government. Her post also called for Derek to ''"get out of my elite uncaring face."''<ref name="tomorrowsg">Quotation from actual post, '''', Wee Shu Min, ]</ref><ref name="sammyboy">Quotation from actual post, '''', Wee Shu Min, Sammyboy.com</ref> Her response triggered an avalanche of criticism, as it came on the heels of the sensational ] of an individual (said to be facing financial difficulties) at ].<ref>''"妻子连搭车去认尸的钱都没有…… 跳轨男子山穷水尽走绝路"'', 林晓玲、杨荣发, ], 20 October 2006 (Chinese)</ref><ref name="nst">'''', Seah Chiang Nee, ], 29 October 2006</ref> As a result, her name topped ]'s search terms for a week.<ref name="asiatimes">"''''", Alex Au, ], November 23, 2006</ref> She has since appeared to have apologised<ref>, 19 Oct 2006. Accessed 13 Nov 2006.</ref> on another blog and shut down her own.<ref name="shuminblog" /> Dismissing the who voiced concerns on ] and ] on his blog, she shot back with a take-no-prisoners diatribe,<ref name="satrev" /><ref name="zbedit">''""精英"博客的省思"'', 社论观点, ], 31 October 2006 (Chinese)</ref> calling Derek a "stupid crackpot", belonging to "the sadder class" and overreliant on the government. Her post also called for Derek to "get out of my elite uncaring face".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140914183003/http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2006/12/%E2%80%9Cplease-get-out-of-my-elite-uncaring-face%E2%80%9D/ |date=14 September 2014 }} 1 December 2006. Accessed 9 January 2014.</ref>
Her response triggered an avalanche of criticism, as it came on the heels of the sensational suicide of an individual (said to be facing financial difficulties) at ].<ref>''"妻子连搭车去认尸的钱都没有…… 跳轨男子山穷水尽走绝路"'', 林晓玲、杨荣发, ], 20 October 2006 (Chinese)</ref><ref name="nst">'''', Seah Chiang Nee, ], 29 October 2006</ref> As a result, her name topped ]'s search terms for a week.<ref name="asiatimes">"''''", Alex Au, ], 23 November 2006</ref> She has since appeared to have apologised<ref>, 19 October 2006. Accessed 13 November 2006.</ref> on another blog and shut down her own.<ref name="shuminblog" />


== Response == == Response ==
In response to the scandal, Wee Siew Kim stated that he supported Shu Min's point in principle and that "''people cannot take the brutal truth,''"<ref name="asiatimes" /><ref name="review">''"A season of sorrys and a few pitfalls"'', ''Straits Times'' columnist Chua Mui Hoong, '']'' (Insight Editorial), 27 October 2006, p. 33</ref> but he and Shu Min's college principal also expressed disappointment and counselled her to be more sensitive towards others. Wee also claimed that his daughter's privacy had been violated.<ref name="shuminblog" /> Critics pointed out however, that he appeared to have endorsed her elitist remarks and failed to address values such as empathy and humility, and that he was apologising for the tone, but not the content of his daughter's response.<ref name="insit">''"Insensitive blogger also lacked humility, empathy"'', Yang Sixiang, '']'' Forum, 26 October 2006, p. H8</ref> Furthermore, the government had previously made it clear that there was no such thing as Internet privacy with the ] under the ] just over than a year earlier,<ref name="insit" /> and that Wee Shu Min should be old enough to take responsibility for the consequences of her statements.<ref name="satrev" /> In response to the controversy, Wee Siew Kim stated that he supported Shu Min's point in principle and that "''people cannot take the brutal truth,''"<ref name="asiatimes" /><ref name="review">''"A season of sorrys and a few pitfalls"'', ''Straits Times'' columnist Chua Mui Hoong, '']'' (Insight Editorial), 27 October 2006, p. 33</ref> but he and Shu Min's college principal also expressed disappointment and counselled her to be more sensitive towards others. Wee also claimed that his daughter's privacy had been violated.<ref name="shuminblog" /> Critics pointed out however, that he appeared to have endorsed her elitist remarks and failed to address values such as empathy and humility, and that he was apologising for the tone, but not the content of his daughter's response.<ref name="insit">''"Insensitive blogger also lacked humility, empathy"'', Yang Sixiang, '']'' Forum, 26 October 2006, p. H8</ref>

In 2019, after a remark made by ]'s staff on the school's relocation to a neighbourhood estate, concerns about elitist sensibilities, similar to Wee, were raised again.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Why netizens are fuming over RGS spokesman's comments on 'the ordinary Singaporean' |url=https://www.asiaone.com/digital/why-netizens-are-fuming-over-rgs-spokesman-comments-ordinary-singaporean }}</ref>


== Public backlash == == Public backlash ==
Two days after Wee Siew Kim first spoke out in '']'', he made a public apology to those who were offended by statements made in his interview, in particular Derek Wee.<ref>''"Wee Siew Kim apologises for remarks"'', Ken Kwek, '']'', 26 October 2006, p. H4</ref> Commentators used the controversy as evidence that Singapore was suffering from increasing signs that ], "smarter-than-thou" snobbery and ] anxiety were creeping into its ] model,<ref>"''How meritocracy can breed intellectual elitism''", Chua Mui Hoong, '']'' (Friday Matters), November 10, 2006, p. 37</ref><ref name="npsim">"''MP Sin Boon Ann warns Parliament of social divide''", Clarence Chang, '']'', November 10, 2006</ref><ref>"''Is meritocracy what it is made out to be?''", Law Kim Hwee, ] Forum, December 9, 2006</ref><ref name="eanxiety">"''High anxiety an elite affliction?''", Ken Kwek, ], 19 May 2007</ref> a widening ] that will cause long-term implications for Singaporean society,<ref name="nst" /> and ] that need to be addressed.<ref name="zbedit" /><ref name="schoolsurvey">"''Students of top schools worry more about elitism''", Ken Kwek, ], 18 May 2007</ref> The controversy was subsequently raised and hotly debated again in the opening session of the ] by fellow MP ], who pointed out that elitism was now an open secret in several aspects of Singapore society, including education, the ] and the civil service, commenting that it is necessary "(to) ''break down the institution of snobbery within our society.''"<ref name="asiatimes" /><ref name="npsim" /> Two days after Wee Siew Kim first spoke out in '']'', he made a public apology to those who were offended by statements made in his interview, in particular Derek Wee.<ref>''"Wee Siew Kim apologises for remarks"'', Ken Kwek, '']'', 26 October 2006, p. H4</ref> Commentators used the controversy as evidence that Singapore was suffering from increasing signs that ], "smarter-than-thou" snobbery and ] anxiety were creeping into its ] model,<ref>"''How meritocracy can breed intellectual elitism''", Chua Mui Hoong, '']'' (Friday Matters), 10 November 2006, p. 37</ref><ref name="npsim">"''MP Sin Boon Ann warns Parliament of social divide''", Clarence Chang, '']'', 10 November 2006</ref><ref>"''Is meritocracy what it is made out to be?''", Law Kim Hwee, ] Forum, 9 December 2006</ref><ref name="eanxiety">"''High anxiety an elite affliction?''", Ken Kwek, ], 19 May 2007</ref> a widening ] that will cause long-term implications for Singaporean society,<ref name="nst" /> and ] that need to be addressed.<ref name="zbedit" /><ref name="schoolsurvey">"''Students of top schools worry more about elitism''", Ken Kwek, ], 18 May 2007</ref> The controversy was subsequently raised and hotly debated again in the opening session of the ] by fellow MP ], who pointed out that elitism was now an open secret in several aspects of Singapore society, including education, the ] and the civil service, commenting that it is necessary "(to) break down the institution of snobbery within our society."<ref name="asiatimes" /><ref name="npsim" />


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}
{{Reflist}}



{{DEFAULTSORT:Wee Shu Min Elitism Scandal}}
⚫ ]
] ]
] ]
]
⚫ ]
]

Latest revision as of 21:32, 10 November 2024

The Wee Shu Min elitism controversy occurred in October 2006 in Singapore. Wee Shu Min, daughter of parliament member Wee Siew Kim and a then eighteen-year-old student on Raffles Junior College's Humanities scholarship programme, found herself in controversy after posting on her blog what were viewed by some Singaporeans to be elitist, naïve, and insensitive statements against heartlanders.

Dismissing the views of Derek Wee who voiced concerns on job security and age discrimination on his blog, she shot back with a take-no-prisoners diatribe, calling Derek a "stupid crackpot", belonging to "the sadder class" and overreliant on the government. Her post also called for Derek to "get out of my elite uncaring face".

Her response triggered an avalanche of criticism, as it came on the heels of the sensational suicide of an individual (said to be facing financial difficulties) at Chinese Garden MRT station. As a result, her name topped Technorati's search terms for a week. She has since appeared to have apologised on another blog and shut down her own.

Response

In response to the controversy, Wee Siew Kim stated that he supported Shu Min's point in principle and that "people cannot take the brutal truth," but he and Shu Min's college principal also expressed disappointment and counselled her to be more sensitive towards others. Wee also claimed that his daughter's privacy had been violated. Critics pointed out however, that he appeared to have endorsed her elitist remarks and failed to address values such as empathy and humility, and that he was apologising for the tone, but not the content of his daughter's response.

In 2019, after a remark made by Raffles Girls’ School's staff on the school's relocation to a neighbourhood estate, concerns about elitist sensibilities, similar to Wee, were raised again.

Public backlash

Two days after Wee Siew Kim first spoke out in The Straits Times, he made a public apology to those who were offended by statements made in his interview, in particular Derek Wee. Commentators used the controversy as evidence that Singapore was suffering from increasing signs that political elitism, "smarter-than-thou" snobbery and class consciousness anxiety were creeping into its meritocracy model, a widening social stratification that will cause long-term implications for Singaporean society, and problems in the education system that need to be addressed. The controversy was subsequently raised and hotly debated again in the opening session of the Parliament by fellow MP Sin Boon Ann, who pointed out that elitism was now an open secret in several aspects of Singapore society, including education, the military and the civil service, commenting that it is necessary "(to) break down the institution of snobbery within our society."

References

  1. Ken Kwek, Aaron Low. "Internet users learning netiquette the hard way". The Straits Times. Singapore. Retrieved 25 July 2007.
  2. ^ "Time to learn that sorry isn't the hardest word to say", Ong Soh Chin, The Straits Times (Saturday Review), 28 October 2006, p. S10
  3. ^ "Teen blogger counselled for her 'elitist' remarks", Ken Kewk, The Straits Times, 24 October 2006, p. H5
  4. ^ ""精英"博客的省思", 社论观点, Lianhe Zaobao, 31 October 2006 (Chinese)
  5. "please-get-out-of-my-elite-uncaring-face"/ The Online Citizen Archived 14 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine 1 December 2006. Accessed 9 January 2014.
  6. "妻子连搭车去认尸的钱都没有…… 跳轨男子山穷水尽走绝路", 林晓玲、杨荣发, Lianhe Zaobao, 20 October 2006 (Chinese)
  7. ^ "Political elitism enhances class divide", Seah Chiang Nee, The Star (Malaysia), 29 October 2006
  8. ^ "Mixing welfare and elitism in Singapore", Alex Au, Asia Times, 23 November 2006
  9. Wei Kiat's blog: Wee Shu Min's apology, 19 October 2006. Accessed 13 November 2006.
  10. "A season of sorrys and a few pitfalls", Straits Times columnist Chua Mui Hoong, The Straits Times (Insight Editorial), 27 October 2006, p. 33
  11. "Insensitive blogger also lacked humility, empathy", Yang Sixiang, The Straits Times Forum, 26 October 2006, p. H8
  12. "Why netizens are fuming over RGS spokesman's comments on 'the ordinary Singaporean'".
  13. "Wee Siew Kim apologises for remarks", Ken Kwek, The Straits Times, 26 October 2006, p. H4
  14. "How meritocracy can breed intellectual elitism", Chua Mui Hoong, The Straits Times (Friday Matters), 10 November 2006, p. 37
  15. ^ "MP Sin Boon Ann warns Parliament of social divide", Clarence Chang, The New Paper, 10 November 2006
  16. "Is meritocracy what it is made out to be?", Law Kim Hwee, The Straits Times Forum, 9 December 2006
  17. "High anxiety an elite affliction?", Ken Kwek, The Straits Times, 19 May 2007
  18. "Students of top schools worry more about elitism", Ken Kwek, The Straits Times, 18 May 2007
Categories: