Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/New Kalachakra: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:59, 8 March 2006 editSavidan (talk | contribs)53,757 edits delete← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:44, 25 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,815 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(49 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''delete'''. --] <span style="font-size: 80%">(])</span> 22:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
''I have refactored some of the long comments from this page to ]. This is not an assertion that the comments are less valuable than the others here, merely that the discussion was too long and hard to scroll through.'' ] 02:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

:''I second that Stifle, and I've moved the rest for the sake of consistency. The discussion page is the best place for that.'' ] 18:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I am ignorant of the dispute from which this article arose. That said, it's a ]. ] 00:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC) I am ignorant of the dispute from which this article arose. That said, it's a ]. ] 00:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


Line 6: Line 16:
*'''Delete''' pork --] 06:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' pork --] 06:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as POV fork; I fail to see why the article must "be preserved pending an inquiry for Crimes against Humanity concerning the banning of the Jonangpas in the 17th century, under the auspices of the ICC in The Hague, and with the help of Amnesty International and the UN human rights". Surely the history of ] would suffice if this were the case. ]<small>(],])</small> 07:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as POV fork; I fail to see why the article must "be preserved pending an inquiry for Crimes against Humanity concerning the banning of the Jonangpas in the 17th century, under the auspices of the ICC in The Hague, and with the help of Amnesty International and the UN human rights". Surely the history of ] would suffice if this were the case. ]<small>(],])</small> 07:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' POV fork. --]]</font>]] 08:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' POV fork. --]]]] 08:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. Good find, Melchoir. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. Good find, Melchoir. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
**I happened by ] on an errand, and ] kind of stood out! ] 01:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom, as POV fork --]<small><sup>] ] ]</sup></small> 12:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Fork. ] 12:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above. -- ] 15:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Shoulda just used {{tl|prod}} on this one. <span style="color: #0055aa; font-family: Impact;">]&nbsp;]</span> 22:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
**True. ] 01:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Sylvain1972 15:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. POV forking is not an acceptable means to deal with content disputes. ] 02:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep'''. The point being made,- and that can be developped on the page, - is that the content is NPOV. And it provides links to other articles that also outline that NPOV.] 09:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 16:44, 25 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

New Kalachakra

I have refactored some of the long comments from this page to the talk page. This is not an assertion that the comments are less valuable than the others here, merely that the discussion was too long and hard to scroll through. Stifle 02:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I second that Stifle, and I've moved the rest for the sake of consistency. The discussion page is the best place for that. Jonas Silk 18:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I am ignorant of the dispute from which this article arose. That said, it's a fork. Melchoir 00:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.