Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Les Enfants D'ombre: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:39, 8 March 2006 editTree Biting Conspiracy (talk | contribs)Rollbackers13,692 edits []← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:01, 19 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,985 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (6x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(16 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''Speedily userfied''' per ] and ]. ] 19:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. ]|<sup>]</sup> 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC) Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. ]|<sup>]</sup> 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Unencyclopedic. --&nbsp;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 00:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Unencyclopedic. --&nbsp;]&nbsp;<small>(])</small> 00:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per ] and ]. ]]]<nowiki>ash</nowiki>] ] 00:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per ] and ]. ]]]<nowiki>ash</nowiki>] ] 00:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', not entirely sure what this is, but certainly not encyclopedic. ] 00:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', not entirely sure what this is, but certainly not encyclopedic. ] 00:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per ] and ] a free text dump. --<font face="Book Antiqua">] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></font> 01:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per ] and ] a free text dump. --<span style="font-family:Book Antiqua;">] ]/]</span> 01:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Reads like an original script. --] 01:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Reads like an original script. --] 01:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' as ] / ] a publisher of creative works. — {{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} 01:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete''' as ] / ] a publisher of creative works. — ] (]) 01:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' as ]. <span class="user-sig user-That Guy, From That Show!"><i>&mdash;-- <span style="font-variant:small-caps;font-family:sans-serif;">]</span><i> <sup>(])</sup></i> <small>]&nbsp;02:10]</small></i></span> * '''Delete''' as ]. <span class="user-sig user-That Guy, From That Show!"><i>&mdash;-- <span style="font-variant:small-caps;font-family:sans-serif;">]</span><i> <sup>(])</sup></i> <small>]&nbsp;02:10]</small></i></span>
: *cocks head* Come again? ;x — {{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} 02:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC) : *cocks head* Come again? ;x — ] (]) 02:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom --] ] 02:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom --] ] 02:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' or maybe keep as a near-perfect example of WP:NOT. --] 02:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' or maybe keep as a near-perfect example of WP:NOT. --] 02:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' ] -- ] ]<font face="Arial Narrow" color="#000000"> <small> ] ]</small></font> 07:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' ] -- ] ]<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial Narrow;"> <small> ] ]</small></span> 07:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per ] and ]. --]]</font>]] 08:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per ] and ]. --]]]] 08:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' ]. ] 11:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' ]. ] 11:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above --]<small><sup>] ] ]</sup></small> 12:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per above --]<small><sup>] ] ]</sup></small> 12:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per everybody! ] 12:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' somebody's unformatted play?! No, just ''no''. ] - <b><span style="color:#FF0000;">St</span><span style="color:#FF5500;">ar</span><span style="color:#FF8000;">bli</span><span style="color:#FFC000;">nd</span></b> 14:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' reads like a ] play. ] 14:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above. -- ] 15:19, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Oh my. Well, it's public domain now, I should copy it and use it and keep all the money from the door! Mwahahahahaha... Oh, and did everyone suddenly get out of school? The a ton of votes right now. ] 15:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', pursued by a bear. ] 15:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' in blind and sheep-like agreement. --] 16:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 20:01, 19 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily userfied per WP:SNOW and WP:BITE. Just zis Guy you know? 19:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Les Enfants D'ombre

Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. Kareeser| 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

*cocks head* Come again? ;x — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 02:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.