Revision as of 17:02, 19 May 2011 editDolovis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,916 edits →Request for comment← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:39, 1 January 2025 edit undoRasputinAXP (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,922 edits Clear the page, been a while. Arbcom Arbcom!Tag: Blanking |
(40 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Back in 2005, you participated in ]. It was kept, but I have renominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at ]. ] (]) 01:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Thanks == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for filing ]. It was nice having some outside eyes looking at the issue. Regards, ] <sup>]</sup> 05:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] of ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: |
|
|
:'''non notable, unreferenced''' |
|
|
|
|
|
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]]] 22:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Request for comment == |
|
|
This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the ] page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Misplaced Pages policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of ] and ] continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at ], and your comments would be appreciated. ] (]) 17:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
|