Misplaced Pages

User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:59, 7 June 2011 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,025 editsm Signing comment by Burntout123 - ""← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:57, 9 January 2025 edit undoScottishFinnishRadish (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators61,113 edits Reverting edit(s) by 173.42.40.34 (talk) to rev. 1267763882 by Lowercase sigmabot III: Vandalism (UV 0.1.6)Tags: Ultraviolet Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--Headings. If you're leaving a new message, please do so at the BOTTOM of the page. Thank you!-->
{{tmbox
|text=Welcome to my talk page.
* Please sign and date your comment (by adding <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
* Please if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
** If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{tl|Mention}} you here or leave a {{tl|Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
** '''If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there''' so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{tl|Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{tl|Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. ''If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.''
* This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments or frivolous warnings.
Thank you, and happy editing!
}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}} {{archive box|auto=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 200K |maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 8 |counter = 32
|algo = old(7d) |algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:C.Fred/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:C.Fred/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}

<!-- {{Busy|end=]}} --> <!-- {{Busy|end=]}} -->
<!-- End of headings, but please add comments to the bottom of the page, or use the New Section tab on the toolbar -->


== Victor Yannacone ==
{{tmbox
|text=Welcome to my talk page!
* Please sign and date your comment (by adding <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
* Please if you wish to leave me a new message.
** If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and leave a {{tl|Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
** If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, I encourage you to reply there. Please leave a {{tl|Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message.
* This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments.
Thank you, and happy editing!
}}


Please don't revert from the redirect. Feel free to discuss on Talk page. ] (]) 02:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- End of headings, but please add comments to the bottom of the page,
or use the New Section tab on the toolbar -->


:@] The revert of an improper move is in order. —''']''' (]) 02:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
== 3RR at Indian article ==


== Happy Holidays ==
Do you have time to look at ] ? This contributor has been asked time and again to provide citations to various articles over several months. In the last 24 hours s/he has added similar uncited content to an already poorly cited article four times, despite my attempts to advise. I am on three reverts myself, although I instigated the dialogue after my second. - ] (]) 14:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
:Forget the above. Someone else has stepped in to sort it out, although I suspect that the culprit will be back before too long. - ] (]) 15:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ]

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!'''
<s>::Pretty much the entire talk page has now disappeared at ]. Am I seeing things? The history has gone right back also. - ] (]) 18:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC)</s>

:::Forget it. God, I'm having a bad time of it. The discussion was on his/her page for some reason. - ] (]) 18:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

== Total Drama ==

<!-- Hided tables:
{|class="infobox" width="180px"
!style="background:#056599; padding: 2px; text-align:center; font-size: 13px; color: #fff;"|'']'' series
|- |-
| style="background:#89CFF0; font-size: 12px; text-align: center" | |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
----
]<br />
'''Hello C.Fred, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br />
]<br />
] (]) 22:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
|-
!style="background:#056599; padding: 1px; text-align:center; font-size: 12px; color: #fff"| Seasons
|-
| style="background:#89CFF0; font-size: 12px; text-align: center" |
]<br />
]<br />
]<br />
|-
!style="background:#056599; padding: 1px; text-align:center; font-size: 12px; color: #fff"| ]
|-
|}
{{Disneyland Resort sidebar}}
{| class="infobox" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; width: 320px; background: lightblue" align="center"
! colspan="3" | {{tnavbar-collapsible|] Original Series|Total Drama}}
|-
! TDI
| ]
! ]-]
|-
! TDA
| ]
! ]-]
|-
! TDWT
| ]
! ]-]
|-
! TDRI
| ]
! ]
|-
! colspan="3"| ]{{·}}]{{·}}]
|}
{{Infobox television
| related = {{•}}'']''<br />{{•}}'']''<br />{{•}}'']''<br />{{•}}'']''
}}
-->
I might be a little late on this, but should we add a sidebar, cuz on the Disney parks article they got one and it looks like Total Drama might need one too. A sidebar will be much easier to nagivate throughout the articles since there are only a few articles, unlike other series when they have 20+ articles, then a navigational box would be preffered. But in this case since there are only 8, I think we should go with the sidebar. The navigational box can stay, the side bar will just be an addition. Here is an example of what I pulled out, its really simple and easy to navigate, but I can make it look better like the Disney one ] (]) 18:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:And I can't find anything as far as a standard for sidebars. The more I think about it, the more I think that for a large portion of the audience, who aren't familiar with Misplaced Pages and navboxes at the end of articles, the sidebar will be more useful. I'd say bring the issue up at ] to get a wider consensus, but it sounds like a good idea to me. —''']''' (]) 18:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::there is no need for such thing if we have a navbox already. Idk...you guys really need to know when templates are important. However there is a different box that can help chronology. But theres not much space to put it in.] (]) 18:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Sidebars are custom and can be applied to whatever size you want. By the way I am not saying it will replace the current navbox, that can stay. The sidebar will just be an addition. ] (]) 18:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::Sidebars would need to be necessary not just additional. If its practically a mirror image of the navbox, why add it in?] (]) 19:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::It's much easier to navigate, barely takes any space, and really simple, there is nothing wrong about it and won't hurt to add ] (]) 19:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::Here is a quick view of how it may look, obviously it's gonna have different colors and not link to the Disney pages, but you get the idea ] (]) 19:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::::Actually, here's a thought against the sidebar: how many of the articles have tables high in the article, so that adding a sidebar, in addition to the infobox, will do nasty things to the spacing? Given the recent issues with table width, it may be best to have as little as possible at the top of the articles and save the navigation stuff for the bottom. —''']''' (]) 19:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::::The sidebar will be the exact same width as the infobox and go on top of it. I don't see any problem with the space there. And if you really think it looks nasty, I can even merge the sidebar into the infobox. ] (]) 19:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::::::Now we're in the realm of the full-blown redundant: each season's infobox has links to the preceding and succeeding seasons and the main show article. —''']''' (]) 19:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::::::Good point, I have changed those preceding and succeeding seasons sections to a list that show all 4 seasons, rather than just 2 ] (]) 21:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::::::::Its unnecessary. if we have a navbox, the disney one exist because the navbox for disney is way too big. a smaller one relating to the resorts and hotels sounds reasonable. The boxes you're adding has exact same thing. Stop making more and more templates. the articles are already filled with them.] (]) 22:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::::::::Bread Ninja's got a point. Consistency is also an issue, and using the next/previous season fields in the standard infobox conveys the sequencing more clearly. —''']''' (]) 22:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::::::::::I decided to update the current "Chronology" section on the infobox to include all 4 seasons (instead of the next and previous). This allows to easily navigate to any of the 4 seasons, not just the next season or last. It doesn't take any space and it's completely merged within the current infobox. ] (]) 22:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Again....why bother if its going to do the exact same thing the navbox already does? the only difference now is you abbreviated the titles.] (]) 22:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::Let's say if you're in the top of the REALLY LONG TDWT page, and you want to go to the TDI page. You don't have to scroll down all the way to the navbox template at the bottom of the page. You just go to the infobox and click on TDI. It's much easier. ] (]) 22:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
<small>(indent reset)</small> Once you figure out what the abbreviations mean. I question whether it's really easier. —''']''' (]) 22:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::Some articles are really long, and to get to the next season or the first one, it requires to scroll down a lot, whether with this infobox, the links are right in the top. The only thing I have done is added the missing fourth season and abbrebiated. Take a look at one of the articles (by clicking on the links), you can barely notice it. It's still in the same "Chronology" section. Just with all 4 seasons ] (]) 22:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Again, missing the point. sigh...you guys think making it easier is fixing the article, but it just makes it worst. the articles are "covered" in templates. Even some that aren't necessary. such as in-universe information (thats right, i'm talking about the elimination table" Along with other things like using "abreviations". you guys just really missing the idea. Hypothetical "article too long" excuse isn't working. the articles are fine. and scrolling down isn't that big of a deal for all the articles.] (]) 22:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::If you say so, I guess there is no need for any more templates ] (]) 22:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::A sidebar might make it more friendly to newer readers. Non-standard use of the chronology box will not help readers familiar with Misplaced Pages standards, and I'm not sure the abbreviations in the infobox help anybody. Net result, I think the changes to the infobox have hurt more than they have helped. —''']''' (]) 22:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::Okay then, so scrap the sidebar. The abbrebiations were just to make things smaller, but without them it will look something like this
:::::::It's not about pleasing the new users, they can get help when the time comes. Like everyone else, getting a welcome tag on there talk page.....you're only thinking the benefit of the editor, not the reader, not the quality, not the level of benefit, and how much damage it causes. Its best you just have preceded by succeeded by chronology in the infobox if you guys want it so much, but not all the links in one. But seriously? This kind of thinking is what made the articles what they are now.] (]) 22:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::::Fine then, I'm reverting all the changes right now, case closed ] (]) 22:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''
== Rinat Akhmetov "libel war" redux ==
|} ] (]) 22:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


== Regarding Al-Bukhari. ==
Just a heads up but a new editor has emerged spouting the "libel against living persons" rhetoric on the ] article. If you remember, back in October you had to protect the page because socks were removing sections based on this notion. I reverted to the stable reffed version we edited it down to...call it a hunch but things may erupt again. Letting you know preemptively in case an editwar happens again.--''']''' <small>(])</small> 23:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


Hello threre, regarding my edits on '''Al-Bukhari''' article, first of all i am not the one who started this editing war. hence i am not sure why you're reverting my changes. the matter of the fact is that the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. so what's the problem here? ] (]) 17:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, C.Fred. I am puzzled by the inappropriate action of deleting "burnt out diabetes" of a likely biased user and by your support for the said actions, in particular by your locking the deletion and for not allowing further discussion on this topic. FYI, the key word "burnt out diabetes" has over 2,000 positing and websites. It is a likely paradigm shifting concept, which, as the history of science and medicine has shown repeatedly, antagonizes traditionalists and those who have minimal tolerance for the scientific progress and for advances in science and medicine. History repeats itself. As for technicality of DELTERION OBJECTOIN (“use conventional methods to protest deletion”), not all people on the planet are as Misplaced Pages-savvy as certain biased. Instead of supporting people who have mitigated tolerance for new concepts and mark anything for deletion that is not consistent with “their” traditional and science-conservative expectations, you may wish to also support the underdog of the Misplaced Pages World in the interest of advancing freedom of science and allowing Misplaced Pages to grow rather than becoming yet another tool in the hands of the monitors of the monitors of the monitors…. Very few people mean vandalism, and to discredit a balanced effort of reviving an unfairly deleted page as "vandalism" and showing least tolerance for such efforts in not consistent with your impressive track record in your website. Hope we see your true you and your advocacy for freedom of science and against scientific fanatics.


:@] You are the one who is at (or has actually crossed) the 3RR brightline. —''']''' (]) 18:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
== A request from Underdog ==
::What about the article itself. you did not address this issue. Let me say it again: the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. and then ] comes and reverts my chances as if he is the authority on the subject. I am not stating my own opinions, i'm stating the opinions of scholars in my edits. and he keeps reverting them like someone with an agenda. ] (]) 20:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::@] I am not convinced that any editor is acting in bad faith. To the extent that I am taking ''administrative action'' related to the article, I am not wading into the ''content discussions'' related to the article. Again, I reverted your edits to bring you out of violation of 3RR; I figured that was a better solution than blocking your account. Do you think I erred in that decision? —''']''' (]) 20:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== Hello ==
Hi, C.Fred. I am puzzled by the inappropriate action of deleting "burnt out diabetes" of a likely biased user and by your support for the said actions, in particular by your locking the deletion and for not allowing further discussion on this topic. FYI, the key word "burnt out diabetes" has over 2,000 positing and websites. It is a likely paradigm shifting concept, which, as the history of science and medicine has shown repeatedly, antagonizes traditionalists and those who have minimal tolerance for the scientific progress and for advances in science and medicine. History repeats itself. As for technicality of DELTERION OBJECTOIN (“use conventional methods to protest deletion”), not all people on the planet are as Misplaced Pages-savvy as certain biased. Instead of supporting people who have mitigated tolerance for new concepts and mark anything for deletion that is not consistent with “their” traditional and science-conservative expectations, you may wish to also support the underdog of the Misplaced Pages World in the interest of advancing freedom of science and allowing Misplaced Pages to grow rather than becoming yet another tool in the hands of the monitors of the monitors of the monitors…. Very few people mean vandalism, and to discredit a balanced effort of reviving an unfairly deleted page as "vandalism" and showing least tolerance for such efforts in not consistent with your impressive track record in your website. Hope we see your true you and your advocacy for freedom of science and against scientific fanatics. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I am reverting the deleted articles because the guy who nominated them (who is the same person) has demonstrated a clesr bias against survivor pages and a lack of regard for winners and that their pages are meant to stay ] (]) 21:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:The discussion was already closed, and I provided instructions to you on your old account, {{userlinks|Burntout123}}, of how to appeal the deletion. You chose not to. Instead, you recreated the same article, and per Misplaced Pages policy, that was deleted under ], recreation of a deleted article. You persistently recreated it, which showed intent not to cooperate.


:You've now broken another Misplaced Pages rule by ]. If you have no intent to abide by Misplaced Pages's rules and guidelines, there's nothing I can do to help you. —''']''' (]) 06:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC) :@] The community feels otherwise, based on the respective discussions. See your talk page. —''']''' (]) 21:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::"The community" you cant call a barley attened afd started by a guy with a bias against them doesnt coint as comminity ] (]) 21:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Could you help me set some deletion reviews up? I have no idea how too ] (]) 14:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
::::@] What part of the ] instructions is unclear? —''']''' (]) 02:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
:I'm replying on your talk page, since the new account is subject to being blocked as an abusive alternate account. —''']''' (]) 06:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
::Thanks for restoring my ] (also ] remove ] on the ] related to burntout123 and burnout1234 so that people in those ] can maintain their access to avoid ], a new and interesting concept that I just learned). Would like to suggest to restore "]" in a restricted format with a more ] and ] ] so that more participants can have the ] to discuss and contribute.(](]))• <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 17:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


] from the past month (December 2024).
Sorry about the joke on Floyd Mayweathers page. But you must agree with me?! lol.


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
Won't happen again.
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">


] '''Administrator changes'''
-V
:] ]
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
] (]) 17:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]


</div>
== Neovandalism ==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]


] '''Oversight changes'''
Hi, C.Fred. I need your help and support. The new page ] is tagged for ] under G3. It is not a ] or ], nor should it be categorized as ]. It is a ] and ] topic. Kindly revise your comments and allow several weeks of ] discussion. ----To_Expand_Tolerance_ 18:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)To_Expand_Tolerance_ 18:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:] {{hlist|class=inline
:: Hi, C.Fred. The page ] is now removed after a short period of time of minutes. Maybe in a few days you yourself can help me revive this page without referring to you or anybody else. Ironically I feel you can help me. --To_Expand_Tolerance_ 19:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|]

|]
:::My concern is that there's too big a hurdle for it to meet to get back to mainspace. You would need to show that neovandalism—and it would need to be referred to by name—has been given significant coverage in multiple ]. Since you indicated this is a newly-coined term, I'm doubting there's coverage in any reliable sources at this point. —''']''' (]) 22:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
|]
:::: OK. Thanks. I will wait a few weeks. In-between please visit http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Burntout123/Neovandalism and help develop the concept without any partisanship. Indeed I feel that the concept of ] can be developed as well. This move can set precedence into the next step for Misplaced Pages as the first source of new concepts and new ideologgies. Burntout123 --To_Expand_Tolerance_ 23:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|]

|]
== Not assuming good faith ==
}}

:] ]
Hi C Fred
] has left a mildly threatening message that does not assume good faith on my user page. I know he/she has already consumed a significant amount of you time and is already blocked but I am unsure what else can be done. I also wonder what steps can be taken to assess whether there is a COI in the user's edits. Your thoughts are appreciated. ] (]) 06:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

:He's not currently blocked: the block I placed on his account has expired. I wouldn't pay too much attention to the message on your talk page. See my comments at ], and see the whole thread at ]. I think you're almost certainly right about the COI, since "burnt-out" diabetes is his subject of choice. I'm sure the user means well, but the number of policies he's run afoul of is staggering—on top of everything else, I just uncovered a copyvio tonight. —''']''' (]) 06:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

== Edit Request on Semi Protected Page ==

I put in an edit request on the page of ]. I see there's a backlog of edit requests so I'm posting here. Can you help out with this?

Please remove all of the following. All are unsourced with no supporting material or verifiable references. "currently creating and developing TV shows"

"works behind the scenes with The Humane Society of The United States on various animal rights issues, producing and directing public service announcements."

"She currently raids celebrity closets and auctions clothing for charity on various TV shows. She also does hosting, and fashion and style segments as a celebrity style expert." (Previous sentence says She owned and operated. That means she does not currently)


</div>
] (]) 18:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
</div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
== My RfA ==
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
] '''Technical news'''
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.


] '''Arbitration'''
I just wanted to take a minute to thank you very much for supporting me in my recent RfA. Even though it was unsuccessful, I appreciate your trust. With much gratitude, <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">]]</font> 02:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.


] '''Miscellaneous'''
==Copyright==
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]
1. Understand the issue and will try to start it de novo.
2. In our prior discussion you had alluded to the prospect of putting 'burnt-out dia..." in my user page. Can u kindly do so?
3. Any chance to merge burntout123 and burntout1234?
4. Feel free to delete this message any time after you read it.
Thanks
burntout123
--_To_Expand_Tolerance_ 03:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


----
:#Cool. I'd have started it myself, but I kept feeling like I was regurgitating the page contents and not writing new text.
{{center|{{flatlist|
:#Yes. Look for a message on your talk page in about 30 minutes that it's been done.
* ]
:#No. There's not really any mechanism to merge accounts. Best thing is to just stop using Burntout1234 entirely and make all future edits from Burntout123.
* ]
:#I archive messages on my talk page—well, I let a bot do it. If this thread stays quiet for seven days, the bot will move it off to an archive page. —''']''' (]) 03:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
* ]
::Thanks. Will follow. Take your time. -burntout123. --_To_Expand_Tolerance_ 03:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->

Latest revision as of 17:57, 9 January 2025

Welcome to my talk page.
  • Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
  • Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
    • If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
    • If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.
  • This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments or frivolous warnings.
Thank you, and happy editing!
Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Victor Yannacone

Please don't revert from the redirect. Feel free to discuss on Talk page. PeoplesBarrister (talk) 02:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

@PeoplesBarrister The revert of an improper move is in order. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello C.Fred, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Al-Bukhari.

Hello threre, regarding my edits on Al-Bukhari article, first of all i am not the one who started this editing war. hence i am not sure why you're reverting my changes. the matter of the fact is that the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. so what's the problem here? Bakkouz (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bakkouz You are the one who is at (or has actually crossed) the 3RR brightline. —C.Fred (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
What about the article itself. you did not address this issue. Let me say it again: the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. and then User:شاه عباس comes and reverts my chances as if he is the authority on the subject. I am not stating my own opinions, i'm stating the opinions of scholars in my edits. and he keeps reverting them like someone with an agenda. Bakkouz (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
@Bakkouz I am not convinced that any editor is acting in bad faith. To the extent that I am taking administrative action related to the article, I am not wading into the content discussions related to the article. Again, I reverted your edits to bring you out of violation of 3RR; I figured that was a better solution than blocking your account. Do you think I erred in that decision? —C.Fred (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello

I am reverting the deleted articles because the guy who nominated them (who is the same person) has demonstrated a clesr bias against survivor pages and a lack of regard for winners and that their pages are meant to stay Wwew345t (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Wwew345t The community feels otherwise, based on the respective discussions. See your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
"The community" you cant call a barley attened afd started by a guy with a bias against them doesnt coint as comminity Wwew345t (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you help me set some deletion reviews up? I have no idea how too Wwew345t (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
@Wwew345t What part of the WP:Deletion review instructions is unclear? —C.Fred (talk) 02:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)