Revision as of 18:20, 19 June 2011 editLimulus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users6,540 editsm fixed last bit of damage by suspected sockpuppet Truthinmyheart← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:35, 24 December 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,402,531 edits Added doi. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar | ||
(449 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|American conservative author (1935–2021)}} | |||
{{Infobox person | |||
'''Judith Ann Reisman''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|r|iː|s|m|ə|n}}; April 11, 1935 – April 9, 2021)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.tvlibertes.com/actus/judith-reisman-figure-de-la-lutte-contre-les-pedocriminels-sest-eteinte-a-lage-de-84-ans|title=Judith Reisman, figure de la lutte contre les pédocriminels, s'est éteinte à l'âge de 84 ans|language=fr}}</ref> was an American ] author, best known for her criticism and condemnation of the work and ] of ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Kinsey Coverup |url=https://www.thereismaninstitute.org/the-kinsey-coverup |access-date=2023-09-27 |website=Dr. Judith Reisman |language=en-US}}</ref> She has been referred to as the "founder of the modern anti-Kinsey movement".<ref name="whyknow">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/12/06/why-know |title=The Culture Wars: Why Know? |first=Daniel |last=Radosh |date=6 December 2004 |magazine=] |access-date=14 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150202092504/http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/12/06/why-know |archive-date=2015-02-02 |url-status=live |author-link=Daniel Radosh }}</ref> During her career, Reisman occasionally served as a consultant to the U.S. Departments of Justice, Education, and Health and Human Services.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-03-07 |title=Biography-Reisman, Judith {{!}} Liberty University School of Law |url=http://www.liberty.edu/law/index.cfm?PID=23359 |access-date=2023-09-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130307124636/http://www.liberty.edu/law/index.cfm?PID=23359 |archive-date=2013-03-07 }}</ref> She held a doctorate in communications from ],<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Shenon|first1=Philip|last2=Times|first2=Special To the New York|date=1986-09-03|title=RESEARCHER LINKS PICTURES TO ABUSE|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1986/09/03/us/researcher-links-pictures-to-abuse.html|access-date=2021-12-23|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> and was a visiting professor of law at ].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.liberty.edu/law/index.cfm?PID=23359 |title=Biography-Reisman, Judith |access-date=2013-03-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130307124636/http://www.liberty.edu/law/index.cfm?PID=23359 |archive-date=2013-03-07 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
| name = Judith Ann Reisman | |||
| image = | |||
| caption = | |||
| birth_name = Judith Ann Gelernter | |||
| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1935|04|11}} | |||
| birth_place = ] | |||
| nationality = ] | |||
| alma_mater = ] | |||
| occupation = | |||
| known_for = | |||
| notable_works = | |||
| television = | |||
| religion = ] | |||
| spouse = Jim Reisman (divorced) <!--{{marriage|Jim Reisman|1954|end}}--> | |||
| children = 4 | |||
| website = {{URL|www.DrJudithReisman.com}} | |||
}} | |||
==Advocating for children== | |||
'''Judith A. Reisman''' ({{IPAc-en|icon|ˈ|r|iː|s|m|ən}}; born '''Judith Ann Gelernter''' on 11 April 1935) is an ] ] writer best known for her criticism and condemnation of the work and legacy of ].<ref name=autobiography>{{cite web |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.org/about_dr_reisman.html |title=About Dr. Reisman |work=Dr. Judith Reisman |accessdate=14 November 2010}}</ref><ref name=calamity>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=214757 |title=Expert talks about the calamity of Kinsey |author=Brian Fitzpatrick |date=20 October 2010 |work=] |accessdate=23 November 2010}}</ref><ref name=NNDB>{{cite web |url=http://www.nndb.com/people/498/000082252/ |title=Judith Reisman |work=] |accessdate=14 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Roach|first=David|title=Film portraying sex offender set to begin production |url=http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=15041|accessdate=21 November 2010|newspaper=]|date=17 January 2003}}</ref> Noted as "the founder of the modern anti-Kinsey movement," which began with a paper she presented at the fifth ] in 1981 regarding the ] of children's data in the ], Reisman has since endeavored to discredit not only Kinsey but the entire field of ] (the ] of ]).<ref name=autobiography /><ref name=calamity /><ref name=1981Paper>{{cite web |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/5th%20World%20Congress%20of%20Sexology.pdf |title=The Scientist As Contributing Agent to Child Sexual Abuse; A Preliminary Consideration of Possible Ethics Violations |work=Dr. Judith Reisman |author=Judith A. Reisman, PhD |date=June 21–26, 1981 |accessdate=12 December 2010}}</ref><ref name=whyknow>{{cite web |url=http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/12/06/041206ta_talk_radosh |title=The Culture Wars: Why Know? |author=Daniel Radosh |date=6 December 2004 |work=] |accessdate=14 November 2010}}</ref><ref name=KinseyInstitute2003>{{cite web |url=http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/contro-03.html |title=Further Response to Allegations, 2003 |work=The ], Inc. |accessdate=14 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.law.liberty.edu/index.cfm?PID=18456&artid=23890 |title=National Expert on Kinsey Visits Law School (Exposes Truth Behind Research) |author= |date=18 November 2010 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2011}} Quoting: "Dr. Reisman, for decades, has been the single most effective force in exposing the fraud and criminal activity committed by notorious 'sexologist' Alfred Kinsey" -- ], Dean of Liberty University School of Law and Founder/Chairman of ]. "Dr. Reisman has been a lifelong champion for women and children. She has done more to expose the crimes and frauds perpetuated by Alfred Kinsey than anyone else." -- Matthew Barber, Associate Dean for the Center for Career and Professional Development at Liberty University School of Law.</ref> She has authored several books and is a columnist for ] and ].<ref name=autobiography /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php/?pageId=43&authorId=97&tId=8 |title= Judith Reisman WorldNetDaily Commentary Archive |work=] |accessdate=17 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salvomag.com/new/mag.php |title=Salvo Magazine (Columnists) |work=] |accessdate=20 December 2010}}</ref> | |||
Writing for ], blogger ] wrote about how Reisman's daughter's molestation set Reisman on the path of researching Kinsey's activities. Purportedly, an investigation indicated a link between the assailant's viewing of a pornographic magazine and the 13-year-old girl's assault (noted in Reisman's memorial page).<ref>{{Cite web |title=Home |url=https://www.thereismaninstitute.org/home |access-date=2023-09-27 |website=Dr. Judith Reisman |language=en-US}}</ref> Following the ], the accused boy and his family slipped out of the country, while her daughter lapsed into a deep ]. Fifteen years later, the daughter died from a ], which Reisman suspected was linked to the earlier trauma.<ref name=alternet>{{cite news|last=Blumenthal|first=Max|author-link=Max Blumenthal|url=http://www.alternet.org/election04/20744/?page=entire |title=Her Kinsey Obsession|date=December 15, 2004|work=] |access-date=November 17, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100325101557/http://www.alternet.org/election04/20744/?page=entire |archive-date=March 25, 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
Reisman was one of the founding members of the Reisman Institute, and served as its president until 2021.<ref>{{Cite web |title=About Us |url=https://www.thereismaninstitute.org/about-us |access-date=2023-09-27 |website=Dr. Judith Reisman |language=en-US}}</ref> She delivered talks on child advocacy, and was the director of the Liberty Child Protection Center. She received the "Protector of Children" award from Citizens for Families in 2005, as well as the "Save Our Children Scientist Of The Year For 1993" from the Save Our Children National Alliance.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Judith Reisman, Ph.D. - About Dr. Reisman: Vitae |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2011/06/vitae.html |access-date=2023-09-27 |website=www.drjudithreisman.com}}</ref> She was nominated by the Inspector General for the Department of Defense to be part of the panel reviewing sexual misconduct for the US Air Force Academy in 2003.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Schmitz Nomination |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/schmitz%20nonimation.pdf |access-date=September 26, 2023 |website=drjudithreisman.com}}</ref> | |||
==Education and experience== | |||
===Children in the Kinsey reports=== | |||
Reisman attended ] at ], where she obtained a ] in ] in 1980.<ref name=autobiography /><ref name=calamity /> Among her skills, she lists expertise in media forensics, which she defines as "the scientific analysis of images, pictures, ]s, illustrations, ] and text in ] of women and children in the workplace, schools, and homes." She "specialize in the communication effects of images on the brain, mind and memory, fraud in the human sexuality field and the addictive properties of sexually explicit images."<ref name=autobiography /><ref name=ncr /> While lacking specialized degrees related to human sexuality, she declares that to be an asset; a lack of 'Kinseyan training' allowing her to see without its biases, "to identify the frauds that underpin that entire 'field' — a ] created by Alfred Kinsey's followers."<ref name=ncr /> | |||
Over the following years, her accusations against Kinsey became increasingly serious. She said that he was a fraud who had employed and relied on ]s for his research,<ref name="Trento">{{cite book |last=Trento |first=Susan |url=https://archive.org/details/powerhouserobert00tren |title=The Power House |publisher=] |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-312-08319-9 |pages=–200 |url-access=registration}} Relevant excerpt: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101124054942/http://drjudithreisman.com/archives/gray_memo.doc|date=2010-11-24}}</ref> and claimed that Kinsey himself had sexually abused children. This allegation drew a response from Kinsey biographer James H. Jones, who wrote that unless new evidence to the contrary becomes available, Reisman's claims that Kinsey may have witnessed or personally participated in child molestation under the guise of scientific research should be considered groundless.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/kinsey/sfeature/sf_forum_0215.html |title=American Experience - Kinsey - Online Forum - Questions and Answers: Day 2 |date=15 February 2005 |work=] |access-date=2 January 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110410102632/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/kinsey/sfeature/sf_forum_0215.html |archive-date=2011-04-10 |url-status=live }} Quoting Jones: "For more than a decade rumors and accusations have circulated that Kinsey was a pedophile. I have not seen any credible evidence to support these rumors and accusations, and I do not believe that such evidence exists. Moreover, reliable people who knew Kinsey's sexual history have testified that he was not a pedophile. I believe them."</ref> | |||
Due to such ideas, she was "ostracized by mainstream academia".<ref name=alternet/><ref>"A pariah among her peers, Dr. Reisman is at the forefront of freedom fighters storming the gates of moral and sexual degeneracy to liberate those enslaved to the deceitfulness of sexual sin." http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/brotherwatch.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101124055103/http://drjudithreisman.com/archives/brotherwatch.pdf |date=2010-11-24 }}</ref> | |||
==Advocating for children== | |||
Prior to the release of the 2004 film ''],'' Reisman and ] attempted to place an advertisement "alleging Kinsey was a pervert and a pedophile".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alternet.org/movies/20692/?page=entire |title=The Joy of Sexology |first=Christina |last=Larson |date=8 December 2004 |work=] |access-date=1 January 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100706021220/http://www.alternet.org/movies/20692/?page=entire |archive-date=2010-07-06 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Reisman states that her introduction to "the world according to Kinsey" began in 1966 when her 10-year-old daughter was molested by a 13-year-old, trusted family friend. She further recounts that when her daughter told him to stop, he persisted, saying that she would enjoy it; that he was going by what he had learned from reading his father's '']'' magazines.<ref name=autobiography /> Reisman states that "] said he was Kinsey's pamphleteer. I then followed the trail to the Kinsey reports."<ref name=autobiography /><ref name=ncr>{{cite web |url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/ISSUES/REALKINS.HTM |title=The Real Kinsey: Who He Was, What He Wrought |date=12–18 December 2004 |work=] |accessdate=15 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
The ] has described Reisman as a "conspiracy theorist" and a promoter of "sexual pseudoscience" in regard to her views on Kinsey.<ref name="SPLC"/> ] stated: | |||
Investigative journalist ] has tracked how this incident set Reisman on the path of researching Kinsey's activities. Following the ], the boy and his family slipped out of the country, while her daughter lapsed into a deep ]. Fifteen years later she died from a ], which Reisman suspected was linked to the earlier trauma.<ref name=alternet>{{cite web |url=http://www.alternet.org/election04/20744/?page=entire |title=Her Kinsey Obsession |author=] |date=15 December 2004 |work=] |accessdate=17 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
<blockquote>Reisman's campaign against Kinsey was described by Morton Hunt (1999) as follows: "To use smear tactics, methods of intimidation, and political trickery to achieve what one considers a moral end, is to live by the principle that the end justifies the means." (P. 209.)<ref name="Bancroft2004">{{cite journal|last1=Bancroft|first1=John|year=2004|title=Alfred C. Kinsey and the politics of sex research |journal=Annual Review of Sex Research|volume=15|issue=1|pages=1–39|doi=10.1080/10532528.2004.10559818 |issn=1053-2528|quote=Roman Catholic Archbishop Paul Schulte (from the diocese in which Kinsey lived) commented, "There can be no valid objections to a scientific investigation of sexual behavior, that would assist lawmakers, educators, clergymen, physicians and other professional people ... but Dr. Kinsey has degraded science. Instead of circulating the findings among those competent to weigh and apply them to the betterment of mankind, he publicizes them like a cheap charlatan." This theme, which has recurred before and since, focuses on the importance of keeping information about sex away from ordinary folk.|citeseerx=10.1.1.731.2332|pmid=16913278}} (from page 3)</ref></blockquote> | |||
Diederik F. Janssen has reviewed her book ''Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America'' from a ] perspective.<ref name="Janssen2012" /> First, the observer says of her book: "This takes the unseemly shape of a paranoid sermon on American decency held together by acerbic ad hominems, a tapestry of slippery slope arguments, a string of unwholesome linkages ("Nazi serial pedophiles"), and a litany of medieval, Victorian, and McCarthyian diagnostics ("plague," "sexual psychopaths," "sexual deviancy," "perversions")."<ref name="Janssen2012">{{cite journal|last1=Janssen|first1=Diederik F.|title=Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America|journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior|volume=41|issue=5|year=2012|pages=1315–1318|issn=0004-0002|doi=10.1007/s10508-012-9990-y|s2cid=146167898}}</ref> Then he considers that Reisman plays truth games precisely because Kinsey had invited sexologists to play truth games.<ref name="Janssen2012" /> Janssen sees her fault in "exactly the scientific cover-up of moral dilemmas she accuses her nemesis Kinsey of. To maximize this argument: what needs criticism, ''on behalf of children,'' is scientism, not moralism."<ref name="Janssen2012" /> He notes that if ]s need "scientific (medical) approval, their days may be numbered."<ref name="Janssen2012" /> | |||
Since Reisman's daughter was not the only child molested by the 13-year old, a fact of which Reisman was keenly aware, the imperative to protect children from this sort of harm became a driving force in her life.<ref name=autobiography /><ref name=calamity /> | |||
Reisman lambasted ] for trusting Kinsey's legacy (]): " on June 26, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court enshrined Kinsey's fraudulent data as the revolutionary moral law of our land a duplicitous sexual deviant was the primary source used by the United States Supreme Court as their 'science' authority in Lawrence v. Texas."<ref name="Gay & Lesbian Archives of the Pacific Northwest 2004">{{cite web | title=Supreme Court Sodomy Decision Based on Junk Science | website=Gay & Lesbian Archives of the Pacific Northwest | date=18 July 2004 | url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/wackos/wacko028.htm | access-date=16 September 2021}}</ref><ref name="humaneventsonline.com 2006">{{cite journal | first=Judith | last=Reisman | title=Sodomy Decision Based On Fraudulent 'Science' | journal=Human Events | date=August 2003 | url=http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?print=yes&id=1565 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060215005909/http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?print=yes&id=1565 | archive-date=15 February 2006 | url-status=dead | access-date=16 September 2021 | issn=0018-7194}}</ref><ref name="Giami Levinson 2021 p. 87">{{cite book | last1=Paturel | first1=Alexandre | last2=Mottier | first2=Véronique | last3=Kraus | first3=Cynthia | editor-last1=Giami | editor-first1=Alain | editor-last2=Levinson | editor-first2=Sharman | title=Histories of Sexology: Between Science and Politics | publisher=Springer International Publishing | series=Global Queer Politics | year=2021 | isbn=978-3-030-65813-7 | chapter=5. Saving Sexual Science: Kinsey and American Religious-Conservative Politics | chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XSs4EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA87 | access-date=1 August 2023 | page=87}}</ref> | |||
===Children in the Kinsey reports=== | |||
About ] she wrote to SCOTUS: "this Court should not permit the institution of marriage to become the latest victim of the Kinseyan model of American society."<ref name="MSNBC.com 2015">{{cite web | first=Irin | last=Carmon | title=Here are the wildest arguments against marriage equality | website=MSNBC.com | date=24 April 2015 | url=https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/the-wildest-arguments-against-marriage-equality-msna580466 | access-date=16 September 2021}} Cf. the primary source {{cite web|url=https://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/14-556-14-562-14-571-14-574_-bsac_-Dr.-Judith-Reisman-and-Liberty-Center-for-Child-Protection.pdf|title=BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE DR. JUDITH REISMAN AND LIBERTY CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS|date=3 April 2015}}</ref> She also wrote to the Court that mainstream sexology is "an ideology built upon the sexual abuse of infants and children, and the libeling of the 'Greatest Generation'."<ref name="MSNBC.com 2015"/> Her opponents, however, make the argument that, ] had the most to lose (not win) from the sexual revolution.<ref name="Hekma Giami 2014 p. 264">{{cite book | last=Paternotte | first=David | editor-last1=Hekma | editor-first1=Gert | editor-last2=Giami | editor-first2=Alain | title=Sexual Revolutions | publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK | series=Genders and Sexualities in History | year=2014 | isbn=978-1-137-32146-6 | chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7nOEAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA264 | page=264 | chapter=16. Pedophilia, Homosexuality and Gay and Lesbian Activism}}</ref> | |||
{{blockquote|Selective quotation, exaggeration, and outright lies are time-honored tactics of the Right. Judith Reisman has long circulated the calumny that Alfred Kinsey conducted sexual experiments on infants at his institute; she offers no substantiation.<ref name="Levine Elders 2003 p. ">{{cite book | last1=Levine | first1=Judith | last2=Elders | first2=Joycelyn M. | title=Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex | publisher=Thunder's Mouth Press | year=2003 | isbn=978-1-56025-516-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1hu8c_wDwvoC | access-date=6 March 2022 | page=233 | quote=Selective quotation, exaggeration, and outright lies are time-honored tactics of the Right. Judith Reisman has long circulated the calumny that Alfred Kinsey conducted sexual experiments on infants at his institute; she offers no substantiation.}}</ref>|Judith Levine}} | |||
By 1976, Reisman began to have serious concerns about Alfred Kinsey's professional ethics.<ref name=calamity /> In ] in 1981, Reisman presented a paper at the fifth World Congress of Sexology titled "The Scientist as A Contributing Agent To ]; A Preliminary Consideration of Possible Ethics Violations" about the data on the sexual response of children in the Kinsey Reports (Tables 30 to 34).<ref name=autobiography /><ref name=calamity /><ref name=1981Paper /> Over the following years her accusations became increasingly serious; she said he was a fraud who had employed and relied on pedophiles for his research,<ref name=Trento>{{cite book |title= |last=Trento |first=Susan |year=1992 |publisher=] |isbn=9780312083199 |pages=193–200 |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/gray_memo.doc |accessdate=20 November 2010}}</ref> and went on to claim that Kinsey himself sexually abused children and had a "child molestation protocol".<ref name=autobiography /> This allegation drew a response from Kinsey biographer James H. Jones, who wrote that unless new evidence to the contrary becomes available, Reisman's claims that Kinsey may have witnessed or personally participated in child molestation under the guise of scientific research must be considered groundless.<ref>Jones, James H. ''Alfred C. Kinsey: A Life''. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc, 1997. p. 851</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/kinsey/sfeature/sf_forum_0215.html |title=American Experience - Kinsey - Online Forum - Questions and Answers: Day 2 |date=15 February 2005 |work=] |accessdate=2 January 2010}} Quoting Jones: "For more than a decade rumors and accusations have circulated that Kinsey was a pedophile. I have not seen any credible evidence to support these rumors and accusations, and I do not believe that such evidence exists. Moreover, reliable people who knew Kinsey's sexual history have testified that he was not a pedophile. I believe them."</ref> The ] has stated in response to Reisman that "Kinsey was not a pedophile in any shape or form."<ref name=KinseyInstitute2003 /><ref>{{cite news |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1374/is_n5_v56/ai_18640605/ |title=Sex, science, and Kinsey: a conversation with Dr. John Bancroft - head of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction - Interview |author=Gary Pool |date=September/October 1996 |work=] |publisher=] |accessdate=23 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
The ] could not find any felony committed by Kinsey.<ref name="The MIT Press 2019">{{cite book | title=Scientists Under Surveillance | date=12 March 2019 | publisher=MIT Press | isbn=9780262536882 | url=https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/scientists-under-surveillance | access-date=6 March 2022 | quote=And the Bureau's relationship with Alfred Kinsey, the author of ''The Kinsey Report,'' was mutually beneficial, with each drawing on the other's data. | page=back cover}}</ref><ref name="Brown Lipton Morisy Aftergood 2019 p. ">{{cite book | editor-last1=Brown | editor-first1=Jpat | editor-last2=Lipton | editor-first2=B.C.D. | editor-last3=Morisy | editor-first3=Michael | last1=Aftergood | first1=Steven | last2=Robinson | first2=Walter V. | title=Scientists Under Surveillance: The FBI Files | publisher=MIT Press | year=2019 | isbn=978-0-262-53688-2 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VLtNEAAAQBAJ | page=241}} — page 241, the only page having the scholarly analysis of Kinsey's file, mentions no felony committed by Kinsey c.s.</ref> In the years following the death of Kinsey, as well as Senator McCarthy and his anticommunist crusade with it, Kinsey's research only grew in public esteem and became increasingly accepted in academia in the years after his death, during which he was established as the American father of sexology.<ref name="Allyn 2016 p. 17">{{cite book | last=Allyn | first=David | title=Make Love, Not War: The Sexual Revolution: An Unfettered History | publisher=Taylor & Francis | year=2016 | isbn=978-1-134-93473-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eP42DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA17 | page=17}}</ref> | |||
After Reisman began publicizing her allegations of child abuse in the Kinsey reports, she was contacted by a woman who went by the ] Esther White and claimed to have been a child whose data was given to Kinsey as a result of molestation. White would later appear in the 1998 British Film "Secret History: Kinsey's Paedophiles." While Reisman holds White's story as proof that Kinsey was intimately involved in child abuse, the Kinsey Institute has flatly denied the most scandalous claims:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=214753 |title=How a Kinsey victim lives with molestation trauma |author=Brian Fitzpatrick |date=18 October 2010 |work=] |accessdate=24 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2006/06/kinsey_crimes_c.html |title="Kinsey Crimes & Consequence" Errata |date=3 June 2006 |work=Dr. Judith Reisman |accessdate=24 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.scope.nottingham.ac.uk/filmreview.php?issue=3&id=74 |title=Scope Issue 3: Film Reviews |author=Jonathan A. Cullum |date=November 2005 |work=Scope |accessdate=24 November 2010}}</ref> <blockquote>People may have used Kinsey's name to justify any sorts of behavior, but that is beyond the control of the researchers. It is possible that this woman's father or grandfather wrote to Kinsey, as many people did, but he never encouraged any such behavior. Following that documentary, we checked through Kinsey's correspondence and could not find any that would match this story. Kinsey did not ask people to fill out questionnaires or forms. There was no experimentation, and no one was 'recruited' to 'participate,' and certainly not to molest anyone. There is absolutely no evidence to support any of these claims. The research consisted of interviewing people about their sexual lives and relationships.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/controversy2.html |title=Allegations About Childhood Data in the 1948 book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male |work=The ] |accessdate=24 November 2010}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
Reisman's book ''Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences; The Red Queen and the Grand Scheme'' was called "wildly irresponsible and baffling book... Nonetheless, it contains some interesting information about the reaction to Kinsey."<ref name="Gilbert 2005 p. 236">{{cite book | last=Gilbert | first=James | title=Men in the Middle: Searching for Masculinity in the 1950s | publisher=University of Chicago Press | year=2005 | isbn=978-0-226-29324-0 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0Ew6IY0Meu0C&pg=PA236 | access-date=1 August 2023 | page=236}}</ref> | |||
Prior to the release of the 2004 film ], Reisman attempted, with the support of ], to purchase advertisement space in the entertainment ] ] "alleging Kinsey was a pervert and a pedophile". The specific ads submitted were rejected by Variety's publisher Craig Hitchcock, who stated that they were "inappropriate".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alternet.org/movies/20692/?page=entire |title=The Joy of Sexology |author=Christina Larson |date=8 December 2004 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=16792 |title=Hollywood mag spikes `pedophile warning` |author=Art Moore |date=20 January 2003 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2010}}</ref> | |||
===Images of children, crime and violence=== | ===Images of children, crime and violence=== | ||
In 1983 |
In 1983, the ] (DOJ) was headed by ], including ] in the ] (OJJDP). Reisman had given a talk on a ] radio program and on ]'s '']'' about the "connections between ], sex educators, and the ]" which was heard by a member of the DOJ, and Reisman was asked to discuss her views in person, which "struck a common chord ... especially those opposed to sex education in the schools." She was then invited to apply for a ], which was approved without competition for the amount of $798,531 (though later reduced to $734,371), to undertake a "study at ] to determine whether ], ] and other more explicit materials are linked to violence by juveniles."<ref name=Trento /><ref name="palmbeach-1984">{{cite news |title=Memo: $798,000 Porn Study Could Be Made for $60,000 |agency=Associated Press |newspaper=] |date=5 March 1984 |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=VwItAAAAIBAJ&pg=1220,5268385 |access-date=16 November 2010 }}{{Dead link|date=April 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref name=Margasak>{{cite news |title=New study will determine how adult magazines affect children |author=Larry Margasak (]) |newspaper=] |date=3 May 1985 |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=w5oyAAAAIBAJ&pg=4320,5493446 |access-date=16 November 2010}}</ref> The allocation came under criticism as the grant was approved despite a staff memo from Pamela Swain, a director of research, evaluation and program development, in which she claimed that the study could be accomplished for $60,000.<ref name="palmbeach-1984"/> | ||
By 1986, Reisman concluded her investigation of "372 issues of ''Playboy'', 184 issues of '']'' and 125 issues of ''Hustler''" that found "2,016 cartoons that included children apparently under the age of 17 and 3,988 other pictures, photographs |
By 1986, Reisman concluded her investigation of "372 issues of ''Playboy'', 184 issues of '']'' and 125 issues of ''Hustler''" that found "2,016 cartoons that included children apparently under the age of 17 and 3,988 other pictures, photographs and drawings that depict ]s or ]," the details of which were collected into "a three-volume report running to 1,600 pages" titled "Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler."<ref name=nude>{{cite news |title=Nude Women, Mud Pies, And The Deficit |first=James J. |last=Kilpatrick |newspaper=] |date= 26 September 1986 |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=VRNPAAAAIBAJ&pg=3253,4342177 |access-date=16 November 2010|author-link=James J. Kilpatrick }}</ref> The report drew contemporary criticism in regards to its cost and quality.<ref name=Margasak /><ref>{{cite news |title='Kiddie porn' study called waste of money |agency=Associated Press |newspaper=] |date=8 May 1985 |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=QJorAAAAIBAJ&pg=3737,1555440 |access-date=16 November 2010}}</ref> ] researcher ] commented that the report was a "scientific disaster, riddled with researcher bias and baseless assumptions."<ref name="Carol">Carol, Avedon 1994, Nudes, Prudes and Attitudes: Pornography and Censorship, New Clarion Press, Gloucester. p. 116. </ref> The American University (AU), where Reisman's study had been academically based, refused to publish the completed work, citing concerns by an independent academic auditor. ] Robert Figlio of the ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/julyaugust08/obit.html#link_2 |title=Footnotes--July–August 2008 Issue--Obituaries |date=July–August 2008 |work=ASA Footnotes |publisher=] |access-date=28 December 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101205131005/http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/julyaugust08/obit.html#link_2 |archive-date=2010-12-05 |url-status=live }}</ref> stated "The term child used in the aggregate sense in this report is so inclusive and general as to be meaningless."<ref name=nude /> Loretta Haroian stated about the report "vigilantism: paranoid, pseudoscientific hyperbole with a thinly veiled, hidden agenda."<ref name="SPLC"/> | ||
Author Susan Trento chronicled additional complexities surrounding the episode. Initially, Reisman was targeted by some as a proxy to attack Regnery. The nature of Reisman's grant work and the concurrent Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, which would author the ] in 1986, caused anxiety in the pornography industry. Fears began to come to fruition when ] stores stopped selling ''Playboy'' and ''Penthouse'', in part citing Reisman's work. Trento writes that the public relations firm headed by ] was hired by Playboy and Penthouse "to discredit Meese's Pornography Commission" specifically as well as others that threatened their business, presumably including Reisman.<ref name=Trento /><ref>{{cite book |title=Mr Playboy: Hugh Hefner and the American Dream |last=Watts |first=Steven |year=2009 |publisher=] |isbn= |
Author Susan Trento chronicled additional complexities surrounding the episode. Initially, Reisman was targeted by some as a proxy to attack Regnery. The nature of Reisman's grant work and the concurrent ], which would author the ] in 1986, caused anxiety in the pornography industry. Fears began to come to fruition when ] stores stopped selling ''Playboy'' and ''Penthouse'', in part citing Reisman's work. Trento writes that the public relations firm headed by ] was hired by ''Playboy'' and ''Penthouse'' "to discredit Meese's Pornography Commission" specifically as well as others that threatened their business, presumably including Reisman.<ref name=Trento /><ref>{{cite book |title=Mr Playboy: Hugh Hefner and the American Dream |last=Watts |first=Steven |year=2009 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-470-52167-0 |page=375 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m5b_eM3twmEC&pg=PA375 |access-date=21 November 2010}}</ref> "Whatever the merits of her research," Trento wrote, when support from the OJJDP was needed most, its leadership backed away from Reisman leaving her project to fail and leaving Reisman feeling "bitter" and "helpless" after "spending years developing an expertise and doing what she thought was an excellent job in the ]."<ref name=Trento /> | ||
In 2017, Reisman became involved in a group called Investigating YouTube.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://investigatingyoutube.com/ |title=Home | Investigating YouTube |access-date=2017-07-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170803211513/http://investigatingyoutube.com/ |archive-date=2017-08-03 |url-status=live }}</ref> Specifically, she voiced her concern about the disturbing content in ] videos targeted at children, ] such as ''Frozen'''s ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.dropbox.com/s/0i7rnq1hvtshu4e/My%20Movie%201.mp4?dl=0 |title = Dropbox - Link not found}}</ref> | |||
===Mapplethorpe exhibition obscenity trial=== | |||
===Sources of child sexual abuse=== | |||
During the 1990 obscenity trial of ], then director of the ] in ], for displaying controversial photographs by ], Reisman was called as the only ] for the prosecution.<ref name="Vindicator"/> In the previous year, Reisman had authored an editorial in '']'' titled "Promoting Child Abuse as Art"<ref>{{cite book |title=Growing Up Postmodern: Neoliberalism and the War on the Young |last=Strickland |first=Ronald |year=2002 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0742516519 |page=136 |url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=oxsj7-aTN9IC&pg=PA136#v=onepage |accessdate=1 January 2011}} quotes Reisman from "Promoting Child Abuse as Art" in the 7 July 1989 edition of ].</ref> which "accused Mapplethorpe of being both a Nazi and a child molester".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bolton |first1=Robert |year=1989 |title=The cultural contradictions of conservatism |journal=] |volume=17 |url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=EEBUAAAAMAAJ&q=Reisman |accessdate=01 January 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alternet.org/story/12903?page=entire |title=The Taboos of Touch |author=] |date=18 April 2002 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2011}}</ref> The defense argued that she was not qualified as an art expert, but the judge allowed her to testify as a rebuttal witness.<ref name="Vindicator"/> Among her credentials as a media specialist she listed: "preparation of educational videotapes and slide presentations for the ] worked for '']'' magazine, created audio-visual segments for television's <nowiki>'</nowiki>'']''<nowiki>'</nowiki> show, and did research for Attorney General ]'s commission on pornography and for the conservative ]."<ref name=calamity /><ref name="Vindicator"> | |||
When ''Playboy'' and ''Penthouse'' printed ]s of ] in 1985, Reisman warned that because of the entertainer's idolization by youth, their publication would ] and "encourage voluntary display by youngsters," leading to an increase in ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Expert links nude Madonna, more child pornography |author=Russ Kazal (]) |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ec5JAAAAIBAJ&pg=1008%2C492180 |newspaper=] |date=12 July 1985 |access-date=22 June 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=April 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> | |||
{{cite news | |||
|title=Prosecution expert degrades 'art' photos | |||
===Allegations of homosexual recruitment of children=== | |||
|author=] | |||
Reisman claimed that ]s employ ] techniques that rival those of the ].<ref name=whyknow /> Reisman cited "a clear avenue for the recruitment of children" by homosexuals in her public support of ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Ex-gay minister backs Oregon Measure 9 |agency=Associated Press |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=cs0qAAAAIBAJ&pg=2231%2C2212152 |newspaper=] |date=15 October 1992 |access-date=20 December 2010}}</ref> | |||
==Erototoxins== | |||
Reisman postulated a physical mechanism to account for the dangers she ascribed to ]: when viewed, an addictive mixture of chemicals (such as ]<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160417005144/http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/The_Sex_Industrial_Complex.pdf |date=2016-04-17 }} ''The Sex Industrial Complex'' (C) Reisman 2005, Revised 2015, p. 3</ref><ref name="Logue2009">{{cite book|first=Jeff L.|last=Logue|title=Online Sexual Behaviors and Parenting Style of the Father|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Du95xBtoYWkC&pg=PA51|year=2009|publisher=Regent University|isbn=978-1-109-10770-8|page=51}}{{Dead link|date=August 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> ''sic'') which she dubbed "erototoxins", floods the ], causing harmful influences to it. Reisman hoped that ] studies would prove porn-induced physical ] and predicted ]s against ]s and ] of pornography similar to those against ], which resulted in the ]. Further, if pornography can "subvert ]", then "these toxic media should be legally outlawed, as is all other toxic waste, and eliminated from our societal structure." Finally, individuals who have suffered brain damage from "pornography are no longer expressing ']' and, for their own good, shouldn't be protected under the ]."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alternet.org/story/20696/?page=entire|title=From Donuts To Heroin|first=Jacob|last=Sullum|date=8 December 2004|work=]|access-date=29 December 2010|author-link=Jacob Sullum}}</ref><ref name=Guardian>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/jul/14/farout|title=Sex on the brain|first=Mark|last=Pilkington|date=14 July 2005|work=]|access-date=16 November 2010|location=London|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001005015/http://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/jul/14/farout|archive-date=2013-10-01|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2004/11/65772|title=Internet Porn: Worse Than Crack?|first=Ryan|last=Singel|date=19 November 2004|magazine=]|access-date=28 December 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101227224015/http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2004/11/65772|archive-date=2010-12-27|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alternet.org/sex/114024/?page=entire|title=Does Sex Addiction Have Any Basis in Science?|first=Cristian|last=Bodo|date=18 December 2008|work=]|access-date=1 January 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alternet.org/story/20619/?page=entire|title=Your Brain on Porn|first=Annalee|last=Newitz|date=30 November 2004|work=]|access-date=1 January 2011|author-link=Annalee Newitz}}</ref><ref name="commerce.senate.gov 2004 f519">{{cite web | title=US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation | website=commerce.senate.gov | date=17 November 2004 | url=https://www.commerce.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1343&wit_id=3910 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050226084253/https://www.commerce.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1343&wit_id=3910 | archive-date=26 February 2005 | url-status=dead | access-date=12 September 2023}}</ref> | |||
]s are substances produced by the brain as a result of various things including sexual arousal, physical exercise, strong pain, laughter, etc. They cause pleasurable sensations and are somewhat addictive; drugs like ] attach to the same receptors as endorphins. However, endorphins do not fit Reisman's definition of erototoxins, as many things cause them to be released, not only pornography. | |||
The 2002–2011 Proceedings of the ] state about her public statements about erototoxins: "facts stood in the way of her opinion and testimony."<ref>Nair, Mohan; Friedman, Rob; Maram, Wesley. "", Seattle 2010, ''Forensic Psychiatry and Behavioral Science'', 2002-2011 Proceedings of the ], p. 28.</ref> | |||
<!--Commented out as it smacks of original research: {{as of|2018|10|2}}, ] contains no results either for "erototoxin" or for "erotoxin".<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=(erototoxin)+OR+(erotoxin) {{Bare URL inline|date=May 2022}}</ref>--> | |||
==Homosexuals and Nazism== | |||
Reisman said that she believed that a homosexual movement in Germany ] to the ] and ]. She endorsed '']'', a 1995 pseudohistorical book which expressed this view, and compared modern youth groups for homosexuals to the ].<ref name=whyknow /> She equated Kinsey's participation in the Boy Scouts with participation in the Hitler Youth.<ref name="Landau 2007 p. 192">{{cite book | last=Landau | first=Saul | title=A Bush & Botox World | publisher=CounterPunch | series=Counterpunch Series | year=2007 | isbn=978-1-904859-61-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aW7j3AUFtVoC&pg=PA192 | access-date=1 August 2023 | page=192}}</ref> | |||
==Mapplethorpe exhibition obscenity trial== | |||
During the 1990 ] trial of ], then director of the ] in ], for displaying controversial photographs by ], Reisman was called as the only ] for the prosecution.<ref name="Vindicator"/> In the previous year, Reisman had authored an editorial in '']'' entitled "Promoting Child Abuse as Art"<ref>{{cite book|title=Growing Up Postmodern: Neoliberalism and the War on the Young| last=Strickland| first=Ronald| year=2002| publisher=]|isbn=978-0-7425-1651-9|page=136|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oxsj7-aTN9IC&pg=PA136|access-date=1 January 2011}} quotes Reisman from "Promoting Child Abuse as Art" in the 7 July 1989 edition of ].</ref> which "accused Mapplethorpe of being both a Nazi and a child molester".<ref>{{cite journal| last1=Bolton|first1=Robert|year=1989|title=The cultural contradictions of conservatism| journal=]|volume=17|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EEBUAAAAMAAJ&q=Reisman|access-date=1 January 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alternet.org/story/12903?page=entire|title=The Taboos of Touch|first=Debbie|last=Nathan|date=18 April 2002|work=]|access-date=1 January 2011|author-link=Debbie Nathan}}</ref> The defense argued that she was not qualified as an art expert, but the judge allowed her to testify as a rebuttal witness.<ref name="Vindicator"/> Among her credentials as a media specialist she listed: "preparation of educational videotapes and slide presentations for the ] as well as having worked for '']'' magazine, created audio-visual segments for television's '']'' show, and did research for Attorney General ]'s commission on pornography and for the conservative ]."<ref name="Vindicator"> | |||
{{cite news | |||
|title=Prosecution expert degrades 'art' photos | |||
|agency=Associated Press | |||
|newspaper=] | |newspaper=] | ||
|date=5 October 1990 |
|date=5 October 1990 | ||
|url= |
|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=istJAAAAIBAJ&pg=2947,1338559 |access-date=15 November 2010 | ||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | |||
|first = Kim | |||
{{cite news | |||
|last = Masters | |||
|first=Kim | |||
|date = 1990-10-06 | |||
|last=Masters | |||
|title = Art Gallery Not Guilty of Obscenity;Cincinnati Jury Clears Mapplethorpe Exhibitors of All Charges | |||
|date=1990-10-06 | |||
|newspaper = ] | |||
|title=Art Gallery Not Guilty of Obscenity;Cincinnati Jury Clears Mapplethorpe Exhibitors of All Charges | |||
|url = https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72622053.html?dids=72622053:72622053&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+06%2C+1990&author=Kim+Masters&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=Art+Gallery+Not+Guilty+of+Obscenity%3BCincinnati+Jury+Clears+Mapplethorpe+Exhibitors+of+All+Charges&pqatl=google | |||
|newspaper=] | |||
|access-date = 2017-07-06 | |||
|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72622053.html?dids=72622053:72622053&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+06%2C+1990&author=Kim+Masters&pub=The+Washington+Post+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=Art+Gallery+Not+Guilty+of+Obscenity%3BCincinnati+Jury+Clears+Mapplethorpe+Exhibitors+of+All+Charges&pqatl=google | |||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121104133141/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72622053.html?dids=72622053:72622053&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+06,+1990&author=Kim+Masters&pub=The+Washington+Post+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&desc=Art+Gallery+Not+Guilty+of+Obscenity%3BCincinnati+Jury+Clears+Mapplethorpe+Exhibitors+of+All+Charges&pqatl=google | |||
}}</ref> During her testimony, Reisman did not discuss the sexually explicit content of Mapplethorpe's work, but rather argued that the five photographs were not works of art because they either did not display a human face, or, in the case of ''Self-Portrait'', the face "...displayed no discernible emotion" and absent emotion, the placement of the photographs in a museum implied that the activities displayed were appropriate.<ref name="nyt-1990-10-05"/><ref name="meyer"/> During cross-examination by the defense on her views of homosexuality, Reisman testified that "anal sodomy is traumatically dysfunctional and is definitely associated with AIDS."<ref name="meyer"> | |||
|archive-date = 2012-11-04 | |||
|url-status = dead | |||
}}</ref> During her testimony, Reisman did not discuss the sexually explicit content of Mapplethorpe's work, but rather she argued that the five photographs were not ] because they either did not display a ], or, in the case of ''Self-Portrait'', the face "... displayed no discernible emotion" and absent ], the placement of the photographs in a ] implied that the activities displayed were appropriate.<ref name="nyt-1990-10-05"/><ref name="meyer"/> During ] by the defense on her views of homosexuality, Reisman testified that "anal ] is traumatically dysfunctional and is definitely associated with ]."<ref name="meyer"> | |||
{{cite book | {{cite book | ||
|title=Outlaw Representation: Censorship and Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century American Art |
|title=Outlaw Representation: Censorship and Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century American Art | ||
|publisher=Beacon Press |
|publisher=Beacon Press | ||
|isbn= |
|isbn=0-8070-7935-9 | ||
|year=2002 | |year=2002 | ||
|first=Richard |
|first=Richard | ||
|last=Meyer |
|last=Meyer | ||
|url= |
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pGCre5iI1PIC&q=Reisman%2C+Judith&pg=PP1 | ||
|pages=216–218 | |pages=216–218 | ||
}}</ref> She also claimed that the pictures of nude children legitimized pedophilia.<ref name="nyt-1990-10-05"> | }}</ref> She also claimed that the pictures of nude children legitimized pedophilia.<ref name="nyt-1990-10-05"> | ||
{{cite news | {{cite news | ||
|title=Witness in Obscenity Trial Calls Explicit Photographs 'Destructive' |
|title=Witness in Obscenity Trial Calls Explicit Photographs 'Destructive' | ||
|first=Isabel | |first=Isabel | ||
|last=Wilkerson | |last=Wilkerson | ||
|date=1990-10-05 | |date=1990-10-05 | ||
|url= |
|url=https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30611FC385F0C768CDDA90994D8494D81 | ||
|work=The New York Times | |work=The New York Times | ||
}}</ref> The defense emphasized that Reisman's experience with art was limited to her work as a songwriter.<ref name="nyt-1990-10-05"/> | }}</ref> The defense emphasized that Reisman's experience with art was limited to her work as a ].<ref name="nyt-1990-10-05"/> | ||
Barrie and the Center were ultimately ] of all charges by the jury.<ref>{{cite news |title=Dennis Barrie looks back on his Cincinnati obscenity trial 20 years after his acquittal |author=Steven Litt |url=http://www.cleveland.com/arts/index.ssf/2010/10/dennis_barrie_looks_back_on_hi.html |newspaper=] |date=05 October 2010 |accessdate=19 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
Barrie and the center were ] of all charges by the ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Dennis Barrie looks back on his Cincinnati obscenity trial 20 years after his acquittal |first=Steven |last=Litt |url=http://www.cleveland.com/arts/index.ssf/2010/10/dennis_barrie_looks_back_on_hi.html |newspaper=] |date=5 October 2010 |access-date=19 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101026123419/http://www.cleveland.com/arts/index.ssf/2010/10/dennis_barrie_looks_back_on_hi.html |archive-date=2010-10-26 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Sources of child sexual abuse=== | |||
==Litigation against the Kinsey Institute== | |||
Reisman has voiced concerns about sexual abuse of children arising from various sources, including ], for providing a ] to ] and molestation;<ref name=NNDB /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pccmonroe.com/Mazo/strike.htm |title=WCU Launches Another Strike |date=15 March 2000 |publisher=] |accessdate=31 December 2010}} "Reisman excoriates State Representative ] for defending the ] and goes on to testify that nude beaches are a magnet for child molesters and child pornographers."</ref> ] which includes sexually explicit content and describes "deviant" ]. Reisman characterizes this as "institutional child sexual abuse." She feels that issues of "emotional and sexual intimacy must be off limits to school personnel" due to the potential for abuse;<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.educationnews.org/ed_reports/95346.html |title=Interview with Judith A. Reisman: Something Rotten in the State of Montana? |author=Michael F. Shaughnessy |date=12 July 2010 |work=EducationNews.org |accessdate=17 November 2010}}</ref> and ''Playboy'' magazine, which she claimed was promoting child sexual abuse through carefully planned cartoons.<ref>Denfeld, Rene. ''The New Victorians: A Young Woman's Challenge to the Old Feminist Order''. New York: Warner Books, 1995. p. 110</ref> She also later took umbrage when ] was featured in a 2009 issue: Reisman wrote that by doing so, ''Playboy'' was directly marketing to ] as pornography "consumers and future performers."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=112791 |title=Playboy targets kids by stripping Marge Simpson |author=Judith Reisman |date=14 October 2009 |work=] |accessdate=19 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
In 1991, Reisman, with an attorney from the ], sued the Kinsey Institute, its then director ], and ], for ] as well as ] and ] regarding alleged attempts to censor her book ''Kinsey, Sex and Fraud''.<ref>{{cite news |title=Kinsey institute sued by thwarted critic |agency=] |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HQIrAAAAIBAJ&pg=2859%2C564743 |newspaper=] |date=9 May 1991 |access-date=22 June 2011}}</ref> The case was ultimately ] in 1994.<ref name="SPLC">{{cite news |title=Anti-LGBT Conspiracy Theorist Judith Reisman Tapped as Expert Witness in Jamaica |agency=] |url=http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/05/13/anti-lgbt-conspiracy-theorist-judith-reisman-tapped-as-expert-witness-in-jamaica/ |access-date=2014-09-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150302004527/http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/05/13/anti-lgbt-conspiracy-theorist-judith-reisman-tapped-as-expert-witness-in-jamaica/ |archive-date=2015-03-02 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== Personal life == | |||
====Homosexual seduction and recruitment==== | |||
Reisman was the daughter of Mathew L. Gelernter and Ada née Goldberg.<ref>1940 Census https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K4YW-25Y</ref> She married Arnold Reisman in 1955 in Los Angeles. Her family was ].<ref>Marriage record signed by Rabbi Leonard A. Greenberg https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K86K-FTM</ref> | |||
== Obituaries == | |||
Reisman is suspicious of ]s, especially those who are youth leaders, fearing that their goal is to "seduce and ]" children.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=480 |title=Rape of a sacred trust |author=David M. Bresnahan |date=5 October 2000 |work=] |accessdate=24 November 2010}}</ref> Reisman has claimed that the ] techniques employed by homosexuals rival those of the ].<ref name=whyknow /> She describes her first encounter with "a growing and ] 'international academic ] movement'" in 1977;<ref name=autobiography /> when asked further about it in a 2006 interview, she stated: "At the 1977 conference it was largely male homosexual power—]– that was in evidence calling for child access."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://absolutezerotolerance.wordpress.com/2006/10/08/interview-dr-judith-reisman/ |title=Interview: Dr Judith Reisman |date=8 October 2006 |accessdate=29 December 2010}}</ref> Reisman cited "a clear avenue for the recruitment of children" by homosexuals in her public support of ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Ex-gay minister backs Oregon Measure 9 |author=] |url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=cs0qAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oNAFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2231%2C2212152 |newspaper=] |date=15 October 1992 |accessdate=20 December 2010}}</ref> In 1994 Reisman spoke at a conference of ] leaders in ], saying that homosexual "recruitment is loud; it is clear; it is everywhere." She estimated the homosexual population at the time to be 1-2% but predicted at least 20% (and possibly over 30%) "of the young population will be moving into homosexual activity" as a result of recruitment.<ref name=alternet /> | |||
] reported on Reisman's death, describing her as an anti-LGBT+ author of bizarre research papers. The obituary noted her claims that gay people caused the rise of the Nazi Party, her assertions that allowing gay members or staff within the Boy Scouts of America would lead to sexual predation, and her contributions towards upholding anti-sodomy laws in ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wakefield |first1=Lily |author-link1= |last2= |first2= |author-link2= |last3= |first3= |author-link3= |last4= |first4= |author-link4= |last5= |first5= |author-link5= |display-authors= |author-mask= |name-list-style= |date=17 April 2021 |orig-year= |title=Anti-LGBT+ author Judith Reisman, who said homosexuals caused the rise of the Nazi party, dies aged 85 |script-title= |trans-title= |url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/04/17/judith-reisman-anti-lgbt-author-liberty-university-alfred-kinsey-homosexuality-nazi-party-holocaust/ |format= |editor1-last= |editor1-first= |editor1-link= |editor2-last= |editor2-first= |editor2-link= |editor3-last= |editor3-first= |editor3-link= |editor4-last= |editor4-first= |editor4-link= |editor5-last= |editor5-first= |editor5-link= |display-editors= |department= |work=PinkNews }}</ref> | |||
==Fringe views== | |||
She received praise from the ], which stated " Judith Reisman repeatedly, over the past several decades, strode into many hostile enemy camps around the world — colleges, universities, legislative bodies, media outlets — to speak truth to power and to expose vile works of darkness."<ref name="Los Angeles Blade: LGBTQ News, Rights, Politics, Entertainment 2021">{{cite web | first=Joseph | last=Jervis | title=Anti-LGBTQ activist Judith Reisman dies at age 86 | website=Los Angeles Blade: LGBTQ News, Rights, Politics, Entertainment | date=16 April 2021 | url=https://www.losangelesblade.com/2021/04/16/anti-lgbtq-activist-judith-reisman-dies-at-age-86/ | access-date=16 September 2021}}</ref> | |||
Reisman holds views on other sexual matters which are ]. | |||
] said in '']'' that "she was cast as a careless, right-wing fanatic", was scorned even by "conservatives who were afraid of guilt by association", and that she had converted to Christianity.<ref name="rhknight">{{cite news |last=Knight |first=Robert |date=17 April 2021 |title=Remembering Judith Reisman: Anti-pornography crusader and a woman of uncommon courage |url=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/17/remembering-judith-reisman-anti-pornography-crusad/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210831043610/https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/17/remembering-judith-reisman-anti-pornography-crusad/ |archive-date=August 31, 2021 |website=The Washington Times}}</ref> | |||
===Nazis and homosexuals=== | |||
Journalist ] recounts an unusual charge Reisman makes: that a homosexual movement in Germany gave rise to the ] and ].<ref name=whyknow /> She endorses '']'',<ref name=whyknow /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thepinkswastika.com/6901/5252.html |title=The Pink Swastika (Reviews) |accessdate=1 January 2010}} Quoting Reisman: "As a Jewish scholar who lost hundreds of her family in the Holocaust, I welcome The Pink Swastika as courageous and timely...Lively and Abrams reveal the reigning 'gay history' as revisionist and expose the supermale German homosexuals for what they were - Nazi brutes, not Nazi victims."</ref> which elaborates on this view, contrary to the generally accepted history of ]. | |||
She further has compared modern youth groups for gays to the ].<ref name=whyknow /> In 2009, Reisman decried the ] as attacking "traditional parental, American values" and directly compared youth involvement in the ] (GLSEN) with the Hitler Youth. She further described GLSEN, in addition to the ] and ], as being similar to organizations under the Nazi regime which sought "to sever schoolchildren from their parent's religious and sexual training."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=93528 |title=GLSEN and the Hitler Youth |author=Judith Reisman |date=1 April 2009 |work=] |accessdate=29 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/news/record/2396.html |title=World Net Daily Columnist Compares GLSEN, Day of Silence Participants to Hitler Youth |date=1 April 2009 |publisher=] |accessdate=29 December 2010}} GLSEN Executive Director Eliza Byard reacted: "Today I read a commentary comparing those young people, as well as me and my staff, to Nazis. We can only hope this is some sort of sick April Fool’s joke."</ref> | |||
===Pornography and homosexuality=== | |||
Another unusual assertion made my Reisman is that "all pornography promotes homosexuality." Reisman explains that "Pornography causes boys to have ], psychopharmacologically conditioning them early to male sexual touch" and elaborates further:<ref name=tps4>{{cite web |url=http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/Chapter10.htm |title=The Pink Swastika 4th Edition - Final |accessdate=19 June 2011}} Quoting from Chapter 10, "Closing Thoughts."</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/All%20PORN%20IS%20HOMOEROTIC.pdf |title=All PORNOGRAPHY IS HOMOEROTIC |author=Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. |date=April, 2005 |accessdate=19 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
''<blockquote>Pragmatically, Playboy (that is, all pornography) manifests a blatant homosexual ethos. Its ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=GM5-AAAAMAAJ&q=Heterophobia |title=Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud |work=] |accessdate=22 November 2010}} Search results for heterophobia in ''Kinsey, Sex and Fraud''.</ref> is sustained by an utilitarian analysis of Playboy images and philosophy. It is not too much to say, that just as the imagery of stained glass windows and holy cards once initiated, instructed and indoctrinated potential adherents in a religious faith, the ] images in “soft” and “hard” pornography similarly initiate, instruct and indoctrinate potential believers in the tenants of its religion, its homosexual morality. Hugh Hefner took great pains to write his own bible; he called it the “].” And on this note, it is well accepted that “Alfred Kinsey...gave Hefner the research base for the “Playboy Philosophy.”...In fact Kinsey can properly be identified along with his supporters and co-workers, as the one most responsible for justifying the kind of behavior which led to ], and more than ], the real father of American’s homoerotic revolution.</blockquote>'' | |||
===Erototoxins=== | |||
Reisman has postulated a physical mechanism to account for the dangers she ascribes to ]: when viewed, an addictive "emotional polydrug cocktail mix," which she has dubbed "erototoxins," floods the brain, causing harmful influences to it.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2005/12/senate_subcommi.html |title=Senate Subcommittee Hears Experts on Pornography Toxicity |author=Jan LaRue |date=2 December 2004 |work=] |accessdate=17 November 2010}} (note: this is a mirror of which is now missing from their site)</ref><ref name="obs">{{cite web |url=http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/Senate-Reisman-Layden-Etc.pdf |title=The Brain Science Behind Pornography Addiction and the Effects of Addiction on Families and Communities |author=Statement of Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., President, Institute for Media Education |date=November 18, 2004 |work=Testimony before the United States Senate, Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation |accessdate=17 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/erototoxin.html |title=Erototoxin |accessdate=17 November 2010}} (index of articles)</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/salvo2/2maddex.php |title=The Naked Truth: An Interview with Dr. Judith Reisman |author=Bobby Maddex |date=Spring 2007 |work=] |accessdate=21 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alternet.org/story/20696/?page=entire |title=From Donuts To Heroin |author=] |date=8 December 2004 |work=] |accessdate=29 December 2010}}</ref> She believes that ] who committed the ] had an addiction to erototoxins.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55338 |title=Cho's erototoxic addiction |author=Judith Reisman |date=23 April 2007 |work=] |accessdate=21 November 2010}}</ref> Reisman hopes that ] studies will prove porn-induced physical brain damage and predicts lawsuits against publishers and distributors of pornography similar to those against ] which resulted in the ]. Further, if pornography can "subvert cognition," then "these toxic media should be legally outlawed, as is all other toxic waste, and eliminated from our societal structure." Finally, individuals who have suffered ] from 'pornography are no longer expressing "]" and, for their own good, shouldn't be protected under the ].'<ref name=Guardian>{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/jul/14/farout |title=Sex on the brain |author=Mark Pilkington |date=14 July 2005 |work=] |publisher= |accessdate=16 November 2010 |location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2004/11/65772 |title=Internet Porn: Worse Than Crack? |author=Ryan Singel |date=19 November 2004 |work=] |accessdate=28 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lightedcandlesociety.org/newsletters/JuneNewsletter/JuneNewsletter.htm |title= The Lighted Candle Society - June 2004 Newsletter |date= June 2004 |work= The Lighted Candle Society |accessdate=28 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alternet.org/sex/114024/?page=entire |title=Does Sex Addiction Have Any Basis in Science? |author=Cristian Bodo |date=18 December 2008 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alternet.org/story/20619/?page=entire |title=Your Brain on Porn |author=] |date=30 November 2004 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2011}}</ref> | |||
==Countering the sexual revolution== | |||
Reisman considers the publication of the Kinsey reports to have caused major ] in the United States post-]. She writes that despite its shortcomings, "pre-Kinsey we still were the greatest, safest, healthiest, wealthiest, most family-protective nation in the world" and summarizes the ] of the time thusly: "American law held that not only were ], ], ] and the like transgressions, those who committed such acts were themselves unacceptable." | |||
Reisman states that Kinsey's publications gave his followers the ability to dismantle the legal framework which had criminalized those forms of ] and altered the public's attitude towards sex by separating it from procreation, making it primarily recreational; the ] ensued. She strongly argues that the cumulative effect was negative; this "pointed America in a downward direction, promoting today's entire panoply of ] more common to the ]." | |||
Reisman hopes to counter this and help "restore social virtue once again to our nation," by exposing Kinsey's "fraudulent and criminal science." To that end, she seeks to "educate both the ] and the court of ], that we've been conned, tricked and manipulated by a corrupt man, a corrupt institute, and a corrupt field of 'sexology' with its offshoots" and desires a ] investigation of Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute, lawsuits "targeting sex education texts, images, and even speakers that defraud and harm minors" and the repeal of federal and state ] drafted post-Kinsey followed by the restoration of the pre-Kinsey ].<ref name=calamity /><ref name=leaderu>{{cite web |url=http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html |title=Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution |author=Judith Reisman |accessdate=18 November 2010 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080115155242/http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html |archivedate = 15 January 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/salvo12/opening_salvo_12.php |title=What Is to Be Done? |author=Judith Reisman |date=Spring 2010 |work=] |accessdate=21 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/salvo8/8reisman.php |title=Rape Rates |author=Judith Reisman |date=Spring 2009 |work=] |accessdate=21 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/09/19/world-net-daily-speakers-defend-tea-parties/ |title=World Net Daily Speakers Defend Tea Parties |author=Larry Keller |date=19 September 2010 |work=Hatewatch |publisher=] |accessdate=29 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.huntingtonnews.net/columns/101208-kinchen-columnsbookreview.html |title=BOOK REVIEW: 'Sexual Sabotage' |author=David M. Kinchen |date=8 December 2010 |work=] News Network |accessdate=1 January 2010}}</ref> | |||
==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
*'' |
*''''. Judith Reisman et al.; Huntington House; ] (1990) {{ISBN|978-0-910311-20-5}} | ||
*'' |
*''''. Huntington House; Lafayette, LA (1991) {{ISBN|978-0-910311-92-2}} | ||
*'' |
*''''. The Institute for Media Education; ] (1998) {{ISBN|978-0-9666624-1-2}} | ||
* |
*''Kinsey's Attic: The Shocking Story of How One Man's Sexual Pathology Changed the World''. Cumberland House Publishing (2006) {{ISBN|978-1-58182-460-5}} | ||
*'' |
*''''. ] (2010) {{ISBN|978-1-935071-85-3}} | ||
*Her commentaries were featured in ''''. | |||
*Some of Reisman's research can be found at . | |||
==See also== | |||
* ], which Reisman supports.<ref name=alternet /><ref name=SIECUS>{{cite web |url=http://www.siecus.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Feature.showFeature&featureID=1182 |title=The Far-Right's Fight Against Kinsey |author= ] |accessdate=21 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
* ] | |||
* ], who Reisman sees as the direct intellectual forerunner of Kinsey and the inspiration for Kinsey's research.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=246053 |title=From Darwin to Marx to Kinsey to Obama |author=Dave Welch |date=1 January 2011 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2010}} quotes Reisman as saying that Darwin was a "major influence on Kinsey"</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.whoradio.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=deace.xml |title=Newsradio 1040 WHO |date=20 October 2010 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2010}} A linked half-hour ] of Reisman ("Perhaps the nation's foremost researcher exposing the true Kinsey, and the unfortunate impact it's had on America.") by Steve Deace; discussion of Darwin starts about 12 minutes in. "Kinsey is a continuation of Darwin Kinsey was dramatically impacted by Darwin"</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18094 |title=Darwin's Fairytales Have Led Us to Savage Waters |author=Judith Reisman |date=22 November 2006 |work=] |accessdate=1 January 2010}} "Kinsey, the high priest of sex, decided to sexually reform America after reading Darwin in college."</ref> | |||
* ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=193505 |title=Author warns against believing 'sexperts' |date=20 August 2010 |work=] |accessdate=2 January 2011}} "defenders of ] traditions appear to be priming for some demoralizing culture-war defeats The battles are lost, says Judith Reisman if those fighting them keep failing to address the pink elephant hovering over each case – Alfred Kinsey."</ref> | |||
* ], a Minnesota state politician who has denounced Kinsey, citing Reisman<ref>{{cite news |title=GOP’s Gruenhagen calls for destruction of ‘filthy’ Kinsey research |author=Sally Jo Sorensen |url=http://minnesotaindependent.com/78749/gops-gruenhagen-calls-for-destruction-of-filthy-kinsey-research |magazine=] |date=10 March 2011 |accessdate=19 June 2011}} Quoting Gruenhagen in brief: "We need to destroy research. It is filled with lies and fraud. The person who has done tremendous research on this is Dr. Judith Reisman. All of this can be found on the Internet."</ref> | |||
* ], which Reisman ascribes to pornography.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16066 |title=Sex revolution triggers national impotence |author=Judith Reisman |date=12 February 1999 |work= ] |accessdate=21 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
* ] (NARTH), for which Reisman authored a paper.<ref name=autobiography /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.narth.com/docs/1995papers/reisman.html |title=Partner Solicitation Language As A Reflection Of Male Sexual Orientation |author=Judith A. Reisman |date=29 July 1995 |work=Collected Papers from the ] Annual Conference, Saturday, 29 July 1995 |accessdate=21 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
* ], a former U.S. Representative from Texas, who sponsored a bill to investigate Kinsey's research.<ref>{{cite news |title=Probe into sex study suggested |author=Michelle Mittelstadt |url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=hOkyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=yAcGAAAAIBAJ&pg=6800%2C1666200 |agency=] |newspaper=] |date=8 December 1995 |accessdate=18 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist| |
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* |
* {{official website|url=http://www.drjudithreisman.com/}} | ||
* on ] | |||
* {{IMDb name|1719395}} | |||
* at ] | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
''Multimedia'' | |||
* ] (and ) of ] conducting a phone interview with Judith Reisman regarding sex education in ]. | |||
* of Judith Reisman by ] for ]. | |||
* of Judith Reisman for ]. | |||
* in the ] video archives. | |||
* ] including Reisman with ] (of the ]) at the 2011 ] (see also ). | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Reisman, Judith}} | |||
''Biographical entries'' | |||
* {{imdb name|1719395}} | |||
* {{nndb|498/000082252/|Judith Reisman}} | |||
* entry on ] | |||
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see ]. --> | |||
| NAME = Reisman, Judith A. | |||
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES = Gelernter, Judith Ann (birth name) | |||
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = An American cultural conservative writer best known for her criticism and condemnation of the work of Alfred Kinsey. | |||
| DATE OF BIRTH = 11 April 1935 | |||
| PLACE OF BIRTH = Newark, New Jersey, USA | |||
<!-- Notice: Do not delete empty data fields; if a person is still alive, leave the date and place of death blank. --> | |||
| DATE OF DEATH = | |||
| PLACE OF DEATH = | |||
}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Reisman, Judith A.}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:35, 24 December 2024
American conservative author (1935–2021)Judith Ann Reisman (/ˈriːsmən/; April 11, 1935 – April 9, 2021) was an American conservative author, best known for her criticism and condemnation of the work and legacy of Alfred Kinsey. She has been referred to as the "founder of the modern anti-Kinsey movement". During her career, Reisman occasionally served as a consultant to the U.S. Departments of Justice, Education, and Health and Human Services. She held a doctorate in communications from Case Western Reserve University, and was a visiting professor of law at Liberty University.
Advocating for children
Writing for AlterNet, blogger Max Blumenthal wrote about how Reisman's daughter's molestation set Reisman on the path of researching Kinsey's activities. Purportedly, an investigation indicated a link between the assailant's viewing of a pornographic magazine and the 13-year-old girl's assault (noted in Reisman's memorial page). Following the sexual assault, the accused boy and his family slipped out of the country, while her daughter lapsed into a deep depression. Fifteen years later, the daughter died from a brain aneurysm, which Reisman suspected was linked to the earlier trauma.
Reisman was one of the founding members of the Reisman Institute, and served as its president until 2021. She delivered talks on child advocacy, and was the director of the Liberty Child Protection Center. She received the "Protector of Children" award from Citizens for Families in 2005, as well as the "Save Our Children Scientist Of The Year For 1993" from the Save Our Children National Alliance. She was nominated by the Inspector General for the Department of Defense to be part of the panel reviewing sexual misconduct for the US Air Force Academy in 2003.
Children in the Kinsey reports
Over the following years, her accusations against Kinsey became increasingly serious. She said that he was a fraud who had employed and relied on pedophiles for his research, and claimed that Kinsey himself had sexually abused children. This allegation drew a response from Kinsey biographer James H. Jones, who wrote that unless new evidence to the contrary becomes available, Reisman's claims that Kinsey may have witnessed or personally participated in child molestation under the guise of scientific research should be considered groundless.
Due to such ideas, she was "ostracized by mainstream academia".
Prior to the release of the 2004 film Kinsey, Reisman and Laura Schlessinger attempted to place an advertisement "alleging Kinsey was a pervert and a pedophile".
The Southern Poverty Law Center has described Reisman as a "conspiracy theorist" and a promoter of "sexual pseudoscience" in regard to her views on Kinsey. John Bancroft stated:
Reisman's campaign against Kinsey was described by Morton Hunt (1999) as follows: "To use smear tactics, methods of intimidation, and political trickery to achieve what one considers a moral end, is to live by the principle that the end justifies the means." (P. 209.)
Diederik F. Janssen has reviewed her book Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America from a postmodern perspective. First, the observer says of her book: "This takes the unseemly shape of a paranoid sermon on American decency held together by acerbic ad hominems, a tapestry of slippery slope arguments, a string of unwholesome linkages ("Nazi serial pedophiles"), and a litany of medieval, Victorian, and McCarthyian diagnostics ("plague," "sexual psychopaths," "sexual deviancy," "perversions")." Then he considers that Reisman plays truth games precisely because Kinsey had invited sexologists to play truth games. Janssen sees her fault in "exactly the scientific cover-up of moral dilemmas she accuses her nemesis Kinsey of. To maximize this argument: what needs criticism, on behalf of children, is scientism, not moralism." He notes that if taboos need "scientific (medical) approval, their days may be numbered."
Reisman lambasted SCOTUS for trusting Kinsey's legacy (sexology): " on June 26, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court enshrined Kinsey's fraudulent data as the revolutionary moral law of our land a duplicitous sexual deviant was the primary source used by the United States Supreme Court as their 'science' authority in Lawrence v. Texas."
About gay marriage she wrote to SCOTUS: "this Court should not permit the institution of marriage to become the latest victim of the Kinseyan model of American society." She also wrote to the Court that mainstream sexology is "an ideology built upon the sexual abuse of infants and children, and the libeling of the 'Greatest Generation'." Her opponents, however, make the argument that, pedophiles had the most to lose (not win) from the sexual revolution.
Selective quotation, exaggeration, and outright lies are time-honored tactics of the Right. Judith Reisman has long circulated the calumny that Alfred Kinsey conducted sexual experiments on infants at his institute; she offers no substantiation.
— Judith Levine
The FBI could not find any felony committed by Kinsey. In the years following the death of Kinsey, as well as Senator McCarthy and his anticommunist crusade with it, Kinsey's research only grew in public esteem and became increasingly accepted in academia in the years after his death, during which he was established as the American father of sexology.
Reisman's book Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences; The Red Queen and the Grand Scheme was called "wildly irresponsible and baffling book... Nonetheless, it contains some interesting information about the reaction to Kinsey."
Images of children, crime and violence
In 1983, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) was headed by social conservatives, including Alfred S. Regnery in the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Reisman had given a talk on a Washington, D.C. radio program and on CNN's Crossfire about the "connections between sex education, sex educators, and the pornography industry" which was heard by a member of the DOJ, and Reisman was asked to discuss her views in person, which "struck a common chord ... especially those opposed to sex education in the schools." She was then invited to apply for a grant, which was approved without competition for the amount of $798,531 (though later reduced to $734,371), to undertake a "study at American University to determine whether Playboy, Hustler and other more explicit materials are linked to violence by juveniles." The allocation came under criticism as the grant was approved despite a staff memo from Pamela Swain, a director of research, evaluation and program development, in which she claimed that the study could be accomplished for $60,000.
By 1986, Reisman concluded her investigation of "372 issues of Playboy, 184 issues of Penthouse and 125 issues of Hustler" that found "2,016 cartoons that included children apparently under the age of 17 and 3,988 other pictures, photographs and drawings that depict infants or youths," the details of which were collected into "a three-volume report running to 1,600 pages" titled "Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler." The report drew contemporary criticism in regards to its cost and quality. Sex crime researcher Avedon Carol commented that the report was a "scientific disaster, riddled with researcher bias and baseless assumptions." The American University (AU), where Reisman's study had been academically based, refused to publish the completed work, citing concerns by an independent academic auditor. Criminologist Robert Figlio of the University of Pennsylvania stated "The term child used in the aggregate sense in this report is so inclusive and general as to be meaningless." Loretta Haroian stated about the report "vigilantism: paranoid, pseudoscientific hyperbole with a thinly veiled, hidden agenda."
Author Susan Trento chronicled additional complexities surrounding the episode. Initially, Reisman was targeted by some as a proxy to attack Regnery. The nature of Reisman's grant work and the concurrent Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, which would author the Meese Report in 1986, caused anxiety in the pornography industry. Fears began to come to fruition when 7-Eleven stores stopped selling Playboy and Penthouse, in part citing Reisman's work. Trento writes that the public relations firm headed by Robert Keith Gray was hired by Playboy and Penthouse "to discredit Meese's Pornography Commission" specifically as well as others that threatened their business, presumably including Reisman. "Whatever the merits of her research," Trento wrote, when support from the OJJDP was needed most, its leadership backed away from Reisman leaving her project to fail and leaving Reisman feeling "bitter" and "helpless" after "spending years developing an expertise and doing what she thought was an excellent job in the public interest."
In 2017, Reisman became involved in a group called Investigating YouTube. Specifically, she voiced her concern about the disturbing content in YouTube videos targeted at children, involving suggestive imagery and violence while using popular children's figures such as Frozen's Elsa and Spider-Man.
Sources of child sexual abuse
When Playboy and Penthouse printed nude photos of Madonna in 1985, Reisman warned that because of the entertainer's idolization by youth, their publication would destigmatize and "encourage voluntary display by youngsters," leading to an increase in child pornography.
Allegations of homosexual recruitment of children
Reisman claimed that homosexuals employ recruitment techniques that rival those of the United States Marine Corps. Reisman cited "a clear avenue for the recruitment of children" by homosexuals in her public support of Oregon Ballot Measure 9 (1992).
Erototoxins
Reisman postulated a physical mechanism to account for the dangers she ascribed to pornography: when viewed, an addictive mixture of chemicals (such as glucose sic) which she dubbed "erototoxins", floods the brain, causing harmful influences to it. Reisman hoped that MRI studies would prove porn-induced physical brain damage and predicted lawsuits against publishers and distributors of pornography similar to those against Big Tobacco, which resulted in the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement. Further, if pornography can "subvert cognition", then "these toxic media should be legally outlawed, as is all other toxic waste, and eliminated from our societal structure." Finally, individuals who have suffered brain damage from "pornography are no longer expressing 'free speech' and, for their own good, shouldn't be protected under the First Amendment."
Endorphins are substances produced by the brain as a result of various things including sexual arousal, physical exercise, strong pain, laughter, etc. They cause pleasurable sensations and are somewhat addictive; drugs like morphine attach to the same receptors as endorphins. However, endorphins do not fit Reisman's definition of erototoxins, as many things cause them to be released, not only pornography.
The 2002–2011 Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences state about her public statements about erototoxins: "facts stood in the way of her opinion and testimony."
Homosexuals and Nazism
Reisman said that she believed that a homosexual movement in Germany gave rise to the Nazi Party and the Holocaust. She endorsed The Pink Swastika, a 1995 pseudohistorical book which expressed this view, and compared modern youth groups for homosexuals to the Hitler Youth. She equated Kinsey's participation in the Boy Scouts with participation in the Hitler Youth.
Mapplethorpe exhibition obscenity trial
During the 1990 obscenity trial of Dennis Barrie, then director of the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati, for displaying controversial photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe, Reisman was called as the only expert witness for the prosecution. In the previous year, Reisman had authored an editorial in The Washington Times entitled "Promoting Child Abuse as Art" which "accused Mapplethorpe of being both a Nazi and a child molester". The defense argued that she was not qualified as an art expert, but the judge allowed her to testify as a rebuttal witness. Among her credentials as a media specialist she listed: "preparation of educational videotapes and slide presentations for the Smithsonian Institution as well as having worked for Scholastic magazine, created audio-visual segments for television's Captain Kangaroo show, and did research for Attorney General Edwin Meese's commission on pornography and for the conservative American Family Association." During her testimony, Reisman did not discuss the sexually explicit content of Mapplethorpe's work, but rather she argued that the five photographs were not works of art because they either did not display a human face, or, in the case of Self-Portrait, the face "... displayed no discernible emotion" and absent emotion, the placement of the photographs in a museum implied that the activities displayed were appropriate. During cross-examination by the defense on her views of homosexuality, Reisman testified that "anal sodomy is traumatically dysfunctional and is definitely associated with AIDS." She also claimed that the pictures of nude children legitimized pedophilia. The defense emphasized that Reisman's experience with art was limited to her work as a songwriter.
Barrie and the center were acquitted of all charges by the jury.
Litigation against the Kinsey Institute
In 1991, Reisman, with an attorney from the Rutherford Institute, sued the Kinsey Institute, its then director June Reinisch, and Indiana University, for defamation as well as intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress regarding alleged attempts to censor her book Kinsey, Sex and Fraud. The case was ultimately dismissed with prejudice in 1994.
Personal life
Reisman was the daughter of Mathew L. Gelernter and Ada née Goldberg. She married Arnold Reisman in 1955 in Los Angeles. Her family was Jewish.
Obituaries
PinkNews reported on Reisman's death, describing her as an anti-LGBT+ author of bizarre research papers. The obituary noted her claims that gay people caused the rise of the Nazi Party, her assertions that allowing gay members or staff within the Boy Scouts of America would lead to sexual predation, and her contributions towards upholding anti-sodomy laws in Jamaica.
She received praise from the John Birch Society, which stated " Judith Reisman repeatedly, over the past several decades, strode into many hostile enemy camps around the world — colleges, universities, legislative bodies, media outlets — to speak truth to power and to expose vile works of darkness."
Robert Knight said in The Washington Times that "she was cast as a careless, right-wing fanatic", was scorned even by "conservatives who were afraid of guilt by association", and that she had converted to Christianity.
Bibliography
- Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People. Judith Reisman et al.; Huntington House; Lafayette, LA (1990) ISBN 978-0-910311-20-5
- "Soft Porn" Plays Hardball: Its Tragic Effects on Women, Children and the Family. Huntington House; Lafayette, LA (1991) ISBN 978-0-910311-92-2
- Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences: The Red Queen and the Grand Scheme. The Institute for Media Education; Crestwood, KY (1998) ISBN 978-0-9666624-1-2
- Kinsey's Attic: The Shocking Story of How One Man's Sexual Pathology Changed the World. Cumberland House Publishing (2006) ISBN 978-1-58182-460-5
- Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America. WND Books (2010) ISBN 978-1-935071-85-3
- Her commentaries were featured in Salvo.
- Some of Reisman's research can be found at Research Gate.
References
- "Judith Reisman, figure de la lutte contre les pédocriminels, s'est éteinte à l'âge de 84 ans" (in French).
- "The Kinsey Coverup". Dr. Judith Reisman. Retrieved 2023-09-27.
- ^ Radosh, Daniel (6 December 2004). "The Culture Wars: Why Know?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 2015-02-02. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
- "Biography-Reisman, Judith | Liberty University School of Law". 2013-03-07. Archived from the original on 2013-03-07. Retrieved 2023-09-27.
- Shenon, Philip; Times, Special To the New York (1986-09-03). "RESEARCHER LINKS PICTURES TO ABUSE". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-12-23.
- "Biography-Reisman, Judith". Archived from the original on 2013-03-07. Retrieved 2013-03-09.
- "Home". Dr. Judith Reisman. Retrieved 2023-09-27.
- ^ Blumenthal, Max (December 15, 2004). "Her Kinsey Obsession". AlterNet. Archived from the original on March 25, 2010. Retrieved November 17, 2010.
- "About Us". Dr. Judith Reisman. Retrieved 2023-09-27.
- "Judith Reisman, Ph.D. - About Dr. Reisman: Vitae". www.drjudithreisman.com. Retrieved 2023-09-27.
- "Schmitz Nomination" (PDF). drjudithreisman.com. Retrieved September 26, 2023.
- ^ Trento, Susan (1992). The Power House. St. Martin's Press. pp. 193–200. ISBN 978-0-312-08319-9. Relevant excerpt: Archived 2010-11-24 at the Wayback Machine
- "American Experience - Kinsey - Online Forum - Questions and Answers: Day 2". PBS. 15 February 2005. Archived from the original on 2011-04-10. Retrieved 2 January 2010. Quoting Jones: "For more than a decade rumors and accusations have circulated that Kinsey was a pedophile. I have not seen any credible evidence to support these rumors and accusations, and I do not believe that such evidence exists. Moreover, reliable people who knew Kinsey's sexual history have testified that he was not a pedophile. I believe them."
- "A pariah among her peers, Dr. Reisman is at the forefront of freedom fighters storming the gates of moral and sexual degeneracy to liberate those enslaved to the deceitfulness of sexual sin." http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/brotherwatch.pdf Archived 2010-11-24 at the Wayback Machine
- Larson, Christina (8 December 2004). "The Joy of Sexology". AlterNet. Archived from the original on 2010-07-06. Retrieved 1 January 2010.
- ^ "Anti-LGBT Conspiracy Theorist Judith Reisman Tapped as Expert Witness in Jamaica". Southern Poverty Law Center. Archived from the original on 2015-03-02. Retrieved 2014-09-25.
- Bancroft, John (2004). "Alfred C. Kinsey and the politics of sex research". Annual Review of Sex Research. 15 (1): 1–39. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.731.2332. doi:10.1080/10532528.2004.10559818. ISSN 1053-2528. PMID 16913278.
Roman Catholic Archbishop Paul Schulte (from the diocese in which Kinsey lived) commented, "There can be no valid objections to a scientific investigation of sexual behavior, that would assist lawmakers, educators, clergymen, physicians and other professional people ... but Dr. Kinsey has degraded science. Instead of circulating the findings among those competent to weigh and apply them to the betterment of mankind, he publicizes them like a cheap charlatan." This theme, which has recurred before and since, focuses on the importance of keeping information about sex away from ordinary folk.
(from page 3) - ^ Janssen, Diederik F. (2012). "Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 41 (5): 1315–1318. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9990-y. ISSN 0004-0002. S2CID 146167898.
- "Supreme Court Sodomy Decision Based on Junk Science". Gay & Lesbian Archives of the Pacific Northwest. 18 July 2004. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- Reisman, Judith (August 2003). "Sodomy Decision Based On Fraudulent 'Science'". Human Events. ISSN 0018-7194. Archived from the original on 15 February 2006. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- Paturel, Alexandre; Mottier, Véronique; Kraus, Cynthia (2021). "5. Saving Sexual Science: Kinsey and American Religious-Conservative Politics". In Giami, Alain; Levinson, Sharman (eds.). Histories of Sexology: Between Science and Politics. Global Queer Politics. Springer International Publishing. p. 87. ISBN 978-3-030-65813-7. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
- ^ Carmon, Irin (24 April 2015). "Here are the wildest arguments against marriage equality". MSNBC.com. Retrieved 16 September 2021. Cf. the primary source "BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE DR. JUDITH REISMAN AND LIBERTY CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS" (PDF). 3 April 2015.
- Paternotte, David (2014). "16. Pedophilia, Homosexuality and Gay and Lesbian Activism". In Hekma, Gert; Giami, Alain (eds.). Sexual Revolutions. Genders and Sexualities in History. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 264. ISBN 978-1-137-32146-6.
- Levine, Judith; Elders, Joycelyn M. (2003). Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex. Thunder's Mouth Press. p. 233. ISBN 978-1-56025-516-1. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
Selective quotation, exaggeration, and outright lies are time-honored tactics of the Right. Judith Reisman has long circulated the calumny that Alfred Kinsey conducted sexual experiments on infants at his institute; she offers no substantiation.
- Scientists Under Surveillance. MIT Press. 12 March 2019. p. back cover. ISBN 9780262536882. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
And the Bureau's relationship with Alfred Kinsey, the author of The Kinsey Report, was mutually beneficial, with each drawing on the other's data.
- Aftergood, Steven; Robinson, Walter V. (2019). Brown, Jpat; Lipton, B.C.D.; Morisy, Michael (eds.). Scientists Under Surveillance: The FBI Files. MIT Press. p. 241. ISBN 978-0-262-53688-2. — page 241, the only page having the scholarly analysis of Kinsey's file, mentions no felony committed by Kinsey c.s.
- Allyn, David (2016). Make Love, Not War: The Sexual Revolution: An Unfettered History. Taylor & Francis. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-134-93473-7.
- Gilbert, James (2005). Men in the Middle: Searching for Masculinity in the 1950s. University of Chicago Press. p. 236. ISBN 978-0-226-29324-0. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
- ^ "Memo: $798,000 Porn Study Could Be Made for $60,000". The Palm Beach Post. Associated Press. 5 March 1984. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- ^ Larry Margasak (Associated Press) (3 May 1985). "New study will determine how adult magazines affect children". The Gettysburg Times. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- ^ Kilpatrick, James J. (26 September 1986). "Nude Women, Mud Pies, And The Deficit". The Blade. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- "'Kiddie porn' study called waste of money". Nashua Telegraph. Associated Press. 8 May 1985. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- Carol, Avedon 1994, Nudes, Prudes and Attitudes: Pornography and Censorship, New Clarion Press, Gloucester. p. 116.
- "Footnotes--July–August 2008 Issue--Obituaries". ASA Footnotes. American Sociological Association. July–August 2008. Archived from the original on 2010-12-05. Retrieved 28 December 2010.
- Watts, Steven (2009). Mr Playboy: Hugh Hefner and the American Dream. Wiley. p. 375. ISBN 978-0-470-52167-0. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
- "Home | Investigating YouTube". Archived from the original on 2017-08-03. Retrieved 2017-07-27.
- "Dropbox - Link not found".
- Russ Kazal (United Press International) (12 July 1985). "Expert links nude Madonna, more child pornography". The Modesto Bee. Retrieved 22 June 2011.
- "Ex-gay minister backs Oregon Measure 9". Moscow-Pullman Daily News. Associated Press. 15 October 1992. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
- The Sex Industrial Complex: The Big Sexology, Big Pornography & Big Pharmaceutical Cabal Archived 2016-04-17 at the Wayback Machine The Sex Industrial Complex (C) Reisman 2005, Revised 2015, p. 3
- Logue, Jeff L. (2009). Online Sexual Behaviors and Parenting Style of the Father. Regent University. p. 51. ISBN 978-1-109-10770-8.
- Sullum, Jacob (8 December 2004). "From Donuts To Heroin". AlterNet. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
- Pilkington, Mark (14 July 2005). "Sex on the brain". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 2013-10-01. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
- Singel, Ryan (19 November 2004). "Internet Porn: Worse Than Crack?". Wired. Archived from the original on 2010-12-27. Retrieved 28 December 2010.
- Bodo, Cristian (18 December 2008). "Does Sex Addiction Have Any Basis in Science?". AlterNet. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
- Newitz, Annalee (30 November 2004). "Your Brain on Porn". AlterNet. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
- "US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation". commerce.senate.gov. 17 November 2004. Archived from the original on 26 February 2005. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
- Nair, Mohan; Friedman, Rob; Maram, Wesley. "I20 Pornography and Sexual Violence: Is There a Connection?", Seattle 2010, Forensic Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, 2002-2011 Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, p. 28.
- Landau, Saul (2007). A Bush & Botox World. Counterpunch Series. CounterPunch. p. 192. ISBN 978-1-904859-61-1. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
- ^ "Prosecution expert degrades 'art' photos". The Vindicator. Associated Press. 5 October 1990. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
- Strickland, Ronald (2002). Growing Up Postmodern: Neoliberalism and the War on the Young. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-7425-1651-9. Retrieved 1 January 2011. quotes Reisman from "Promoting Child Abuse as Art" in the 7 July 1989 edition of The Washington Times.
- Bolton, Robert (1989). "The cultural contradictions of conservatism". New Art Examiner. 17. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
- Nathan, Debbie (18 April 2002). "The Taboos of Touch". AlterNet. Retrieved 1 January 2011.
- Masters, Kim (1990-10-06). "Art Gallery Not Guilty of Obscenity;Cincinnati Jury Clears Mapplethorpe Exhibitors of All Charges". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2012-11-04. Retrieved 2017-07-06.
- ^ Wilkerson, Isabel (1990-10-05). "Witness in Obscenity Trial Calls Explicit Photographs 'Destructive'". The New York Times.
- ^ Meyer, Richard (2002). Outlaw Representation: Censorship and Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century American Art. Beacon Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 0-8070-7935-9.
- Litt, Steven (5 October 2010). "Dennis Barrie looks back on his Cincinnati obscenity trial 20 years after his acquittal". The Plain Dealer. Archived from the original on 2010-10-26. Retrieved 19 June 2011.
- "Kinsey institute sued by thwarted critic". The Bulletin (Bend). Associated Press. 9 May 1991. Retrieved 22 June 2011.
- 1940 Census https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K4YW-25Y
- Marriage record signed by Rabbi Leonard A. Greenberg https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K86K-FTM
- Wakefield, Lily (17 April 2021). "Anti-LGBT+ author Judith Reisman, who said homosexuals caused the rise of the Nazi party, dies aged 85". PinkNews.
- Jervis, Joseph (16 April 2021). "Anti-LGBTQ activist Judith Reisman dies at age 86". Los Angeles Blade: LGBTQ News, Rights, Politics, Entertainment. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
- Knight, Robert (17 April 2021). "Remembering Judith Reisman: Anti-pornography crusader and a woman of uncommon courage". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on August 31, 2021.
External links
Categories:- 1935 births
- 2021 deaths
- 20th-century American non-fiction writers
- 20th-century American women writers
- 21st-century American non-fiction writers
- 21st-century American women writers
- American commentators
- American conspiracy theorists
- American relationships and sexuality writers
- American women columnists
- American women non-fiction writers
- Anti-pornography activists
- Case Western Reserve University alumni
- Hate speech
- Jewish American activists
- Jewish American non-fiction writers
- Jewish women writers
- New Right (United States)
- Polytechnic Institute of New York University alumni
- Social conservatism in the United States
- Anti-LGBTQ activists