Revision as of 14:27, 1 July 2011 editKiefer.Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)39,688 edits →Life and Education: Manhattan's Stuyvesant High School, one of the then three academically elite high–schols of the NYC Public School System.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:15, 1 January 2025 edit undoJohn of Reading (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers766,646 edits →Measuring the power of voting blocs in a committee: Game Theory links to a YouTuber not the mathematical topicTag: AWB | ||
(175 intermediate revisions by 95 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|American law professor (born 1940)}} | |||
{{Infobox Person | |||
{{Infobox person | |||
|name = John Francis Banzhaf III | |||
|image = John F. Banzhaf III.jpg | |image = John F. Banzhaf III.jpg | ||
|imagesize |
|imagesize = | ||
|caption = |
|caption = | ||
|birth_name = John Francis Banzhaf III | |||
|birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1940|7|2|mf=yes}} | |birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1940|7|2|mf=yes}} | ||
|birth_place = ] | |birth_place = ] | ||
|known_for = ] | |known_for = ] | ||
|education = ], ] | |education = ], ] | ||
|alma_mater = ]<br>] | |alma_mater = ]<br>]<br>] | ||
|employer = ] | |employer = ] | ||
|occupation = ] | |occupation = ] | ||
|website = http://banzhaf.net |
|website = {{url|http://banzhaf.net}} | ||
|footnotes = |
|footnotes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''John Francis Banzhaf III''' ({{pron-en|ˈbænz.hɑːf}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.aspx?id=1759 |title=GW Law Profiles - John F. Banzhaf III |accessdate=2008-08-02 |publisher= George Washington University Law School}}</ref>) (born July 2, 1940) is an ] legal ] and a law professor at ]. He is the founder of the smoking ] ].<ref name="CB"> | |||
{{cite encyclopedia | |||
| encyclopedia = Current Biography Yearbook | |||
| title = Banzhaf, John F(rancis), 3d | |||
| year = 1973 | |||
| publisher = H. W. Wilson | |||
| pages = 30–33 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
He is noted for his ] of, and use of, ]s as a method to promote what he believes is the ]. | |||
'''John Francis Banzhaf III''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|b|æ|n|z|.|h|ɑː|f}};<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.aspx?id=1759 |title=GW Law Profiles - John F. Banzhaf III |accessdate=2008-08-02 |publisher=George Washington University Law School |archive-date=2011-12-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111216130040/http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.aspx?id=1759 |url-status=dead }}</ref> born July 2, 1940) is an American ] lawyer, legal activist, and law professor at the ]. He is the founder of an ] advocacy group, ].<ref name=CB>{{cite encyclopedia | encyclopedia = Current Biography Yearbook | title = Banzhaf, John F(rancis), 3d | year = 1973 | publisher = H. W. Wilson | pages = 30–33 }}</ref> He is noted for his advocacy and use of lawsuits as a method to promote what he believes is the public interest. | |||
==Life and Education== | |||
==Life and education== | |||
Banzhaf was born July 2, 1940 in ]. He graduated at the age of 15 (three years earlier than usual) from Manhattan's ], one of the three ] of the ]. | |||
Banzhaf was born July 2, 1940, in ]. He graduated at the age of 15 from Manhattan's ], one of the three ] of the ]. He went on to graduate from the ] with a ] and from ] with a ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.law.gwu.edu/john-f-banzhaf-iii|title=John F. Banzhaf III - GW Law - The George Washington University|website=law.gwu.edu|accessdate=3 July 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.banzhaf.net|title=PROFESSOR JOHN F. BANZHAF III|website=banzhaf.net|access-date=3 July 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160507022748/http://banzhaf.net/|archive-date=7 May 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.martindale.com/Search_Tools/Law_Schools/schl0273.aspx|title=THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL|website=martindale.com|publisher=]|access-date=3 July 2016|quote=JOHN F. BANZHAF, (Law Professor), born 1940; admitted to bar, 1965, New York; 1966, District of Columbia. Education: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (B.S.E.E., 1962); Columbia University (J.D., 1965). COURSES:Administrative Law, Law and the Disabled, Legal Activism, Torts.|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160528200940/http://www.martindale.com/Search_Tools/Law_Schools/schl0273.aspx|archive-date=28 May 2016}}</ref> | |||
==Contributions to law and public policy== | |||
==Activism== | |||
===Copyright law=== | |||
Banzhaf got an early start in legal ]. While still a student in law school, he was assigned to research and draft a note for the ]<ref>Banzhaf, John. "Copyright Protection for Computer Programs." 64 Colum. L. Rev. 1274 (1964)</ref> on whether computer programs and other software could be protected under U.S. copyright law. The ] had previously declined to grant any patents on software, and no computer program copyrights had ever been recognized. As part of his research, Banzhaf sought to register copyrights on two programs he had written: one in printed form, and the other recorded on magnetic tape. In 1964, he convinced the U.S. Copyright Office to officially register his two copyrights,<ref>"Computer Program Copyrighted for First Time; Columbia Law Student Gets Approval For Plans – Sees Wide Industry Impact." New York Times: May 8, 1964. http://banzhaf.net/docs/NYTimesProgramCopyrighted</ref> thereby recognizing for the first time the validity of this new form of legal protection.<ref>"The Law Professor Behind: ASH, SOUP, PUMP and CRASH." New York Times: August 23, 1970. http://banzhaf.net/docs/NYTimesBehindASHSoup.pdf</ref> | |||
=== Freddie Gray complaint === | |||
One year later, he testified at a congressional hearing at which he urged - ultimately successfully - that the long-awaited revision of U.S. copyright law should expressly recognize computer and data processing issues.<ref>Hearings on H.R. 4347, H.R. 5680, H.R. 6831 and H.R. 6835 before Subcomm. No. 3 of the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 1144-50 (statement and testimony of John F. Banzhaf III), 1898-99.</ref> | |||
Banzhaf filed a complaint with the Maryland's Attorney Grievance Commission against Prosecutor ], the ] of ], saying she did not have ] to charge six officers in the ], and also that she repeatedly withheld ] from the officers' defense attorneys.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=http://www.wbal.com/article/173570/2/law-professor-files-complaint-against-mosby|title=Law Professor Files Complaint Against Mosby|website=wbal.com|accessdate=2 July 2016}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{cite web|url=http://foxbaltimore.com/news/local/mosby-draws-criticism|title=Mosby draws criticism|first=Jeff|last=Abell|website=foxbaltimore.com|date=29 June 2016|accessdate=2 July 2016}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite web|url=http://www.abc2news.com/news/region/baltimore-city/george-washington-law-professor-files-complaint-against-marilyn-mosby|title=George Washington law professor files complaint against Marilyn Mosby|date=30 June 2016|publisher=Associated Press|accessdate=2 July 2016|via=abc2news.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160701140400/http://www.abc2news.com/news/region/baltimore-city/george-washington-law-professor-files-complaint-against-marilyn-mosby|archive-date=1 July 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{cite web|url=http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/freddie-gray/bs-md-ci-mosby-attorney-grievance-20160629-story.html|title=Activist law professor calls for Mosby disbarment over prosecution in Freddie Gray case|publisher=]|accessdate=2 July 2016}}</ref> He compared her to ] and his handling of the ].<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/us/law-professor-goes-after-maryland-prosecutor-for-freddie-gray-case|title=Law professor goes after Maryland prosecutor for Freddie Gray case|website=] |date=August 2016}}</ref> | |||
===Copyright of computer software=== | |||
Banzhaf got an early start in legal advocacy. While still a student in law school, he was assigned to research and draft a note for the ]<ref>Banzhaf, John. "Copyright Protection for Computer Programs." 64 Colum. L. Rev. 1274 (1964)</ref> on whether ]s and other ] could be protected under ]. The ] had previously declined to grant any patents on software, and no ] had ever been recognized. As part of his research, Banzhaf sought to register copyrights on two programs he had written: one in printed form, and the other recorded on magnetic tape. In 1964, the ] registered two copyrights of Banzhaf,<ref>"." ''New York Times'': May 8, 1964.</ref> thereby recognizing for the first time the validity of this new form of legal protection.<ref>"The Law Professor Behind: ASH, SOUP, PUMP and CRASH." ''New York Times'': August 23, 1970. http://banzhaf.net/docs/NYTimesBehindASHSoup.pdf</ref> | |||
One year later, he testified at a congressional hearing at which he urged, ultimately successfully, that the long-awaited revision of US copyright law should expressly recognize computer and ] issues.<ref>Hearings on H.R. 4347, H.R. 5680, H.R. 6831 and H.R. 6835 before Subcomm. No. 3 of the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 1144-50 (statement and testimony of John F. Banzhaf III), 1898-99.</ref> | |||
===Measuring the power of voting blocs in a committee=== | |||
{{Main|Banzhaf power index}} | |||
{{See also|Shapley–Shubik power index|Shapley value|Cooperative game theory}} | |||
Banzhaf studied the ] Board's voting system, which allocated the total of 30 votes to its municipalities as follows: | |||
* Hempstead #1: 9 | |||
* Hempstead #2: 9 | |||
* North Hempstead: 7 | |||
* Oyster Bay: 3 | |||
* Glen Cove: 1 | |||
* Long Beach: 1 | |||
A simple majority of 16 votes sufficed to win a vote. | |||
In Banzhaf's notation, are A-F in | |||
There are 32 winning coalitions, and 48 swing votes: | |||
<u>AB</u> <u>AC</u> <u>BC</u> ABC <u>AB</u>D <u>AB</u>E <u>AB</u>F <u>AC</u>D <u>AC</u>E <u>AC</u>F <u>BC</u>D <u>BC</u>E <u>BC</u>F ABCD ABCE ABCF <u>AB</u>DE <u>AB</u>DF <u>AB</u>EF <u>AC</u>DE <u>AC</u>DF <u>AC</u>EF <u>BC</u>DE <u>BC</u>DF <u>BC</u>EF ABCDE ABCDF ABCEF <u>AB</u>DEF <u>AC</u>DEF <u>BC</u>DEF ABCDEF | |||
Banzhaf proposed an index, now known as the "]", to measure the power of each municipality: | |||
* Hempstead #1 = 1/3 | |||
* Hempstead #2 = 1/3 | |||
* North Hempstead = 1/3 | |||
* Oyster Bay = 0 | |||
* Glen Cove = 0 | |||
* Long Beach = 0 | |||
Banzhaf argued that a voting arrangement that gives zero power to one-sixth of the county's population is unfair<ref>{{Citation |last=Banzhaf |first=John F. |title=Weighted voting doesn't work: A mathematical analysis |journal=Rutgers Law Review |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=317–343 |year=1965 |author-link=John F. Banzhaf III}}</ref> and sued the board. {{Citation needed|date=March 2008}} The Banzhaf power index has been used as a way to measure voting power, along with the ].<ref>{{cite book|author=Straffin, Philip D.|title=Game Theory and Strategy|url=https://archive.org/details/gametheorystrate0000stra|url-access=registration|series=New Mathematical Library|publisher=The Mathematical Association of America|date=5 September 1996|isbn=0-88385-637-9}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | |||
| last = Lehrer | |||
| first = Ehud | |||
| author-link = Ehud Lehrer | |||
| title = An axiomatization of the Banzhaf value | |||
| journal = International Journal of Game Theory | |||
| volume = 17 | |||
| issue = 2 | |||
| pages = 89–99 | |||
| year = 1988 | |||
| doi = 10.1007/BF01254541| s2cid = 189830513 | |||
}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | |||
| last =Moulin | |||
| first =Herve | |||
| author-link =Herve Moulin | |||
| title =Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making | |||
| publisher =] | |||
| year =1988 | |||
| edition = 1st | |||
| location =Cambridge | |||
| isbn = 0-521-42458-5}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | |||
| last =Owen | |||
| first =Guillermo | |||
| author-link =Guillermo Owen | |||
| title =Game Theory | |||
| place=San Diego | |||
| publisher =] | |||
| year =1995 | |||
| edition = 3rd | |||
| isbn = 0-12-531151-6 | |||
}}</ref><ref>], William F. Lucas and Philip D. Straffin, Jr., ''Modules in Applied Mathematics: Political and Related Models,'' vol. 2. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983. This volume has several essays discussing the Banzhaf index.</ref> | |||
===Teaching=== | ===Teaching=== | ||
Banzhaf has |
Banzhaf has used a clinical-project format in some of his law classes, rather than a more traditional lecture and academic study format. Students are divided into teams and asked to work on some genuine consumer problems.<ref name=CB/>{{Rp|33}} | ||
One of the students' high-profile projects was a suit against former Vice-President ] seeking to force |
One of the students' high-profile projects was a suit against former Vice-President ] seeking to force Agnew to repay the ]s he accepted while ]. Agnew was ordered to repay the state the $147,500 in ], with interest of $101,235, for a total of $248,735. The project was started in 1976 by three students in Banzhaf's class on ]. The students recruited three ] residents to carry the suit.<ref> | ||
{{cite news |first=Ben A. |last=Franklin |title=Court says Agnew took bribes; orders repayment |work=New York Times |date=1981-04-28 }} | |||
<ref> | |||
{{cite news |first=Ben A. |last=Franklin |title=Court says Agnew took bribes; orders repayment |work=New York Times |pages= |page= |date=1981-04-28 }} | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Another case that attracted much attention targeted the ] restaurant chain. One of Banzhaf's students, James Pizzirusso, successfully sued McDonald's in 2001 for precooking their |
Another case that attracted much attention targeted the ] restaurant chain. One of Banzhaf's students, James Pizzirusso, successfully sued McDonald's in 2001 for precooking their French fries in beef fat and not warning ]s and beef avoiders about it; in 2002, Pizzirusso won a ] settlement of $12.5 million.<ref name=Brune/> | ||
Five students in Banzhaf’s public interest law class took on an environmental case that set ] precedent on “]” in 1973, persisting for over 50 years. '']'' (SCRAP) was also the first full court consideration of the ] (NEPA).<ref>{{Cite news |last=DeLauro |first=Rosa |date=November 30, 2023 |title=Recognizing Neil Thomas Proto on the 50th Anniversary of the United States of America v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures |url=https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2023/11/30/169/197/CREC-2023-11-30-pt1-PgE1146-4.pdf |work=Congressional Record |pages=E1146}}</ref> In December 1971, the students, led by SCRAP chair and third-year student ], filed a petition with the ] (ICC) seeking a $1 billion refund for the failure of the commission to comply with NEPA. The students argued that the ICC failed to comply with NEPA in approving a 20 percent railroad freight rate increase that the students claimed discriminated against the movement of recyclable materials by favoring the movement of raw materials.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Proto |first=Neil Thomas |title=To a High Court: Five Bold Law Students Challenge Corporate Greed and Change the Law |publisher=FriesenPress |year=2023}}</ref> | |||
===Tobacco=== | ===Tobacco=== | ||
Much of Banzhaf's tobacco work has been done through the |
Much of Banzhaf's tobacco work has been done through the ], a ] he founded in 1967.<ref name=CB/> | ||
====Television advertising==== | |||
In late 1966 he asked WCBS-TV to allow air time for anti-smoking spots. The station refused to allow any time, so Banzhaf appealed the denial to the FCC. Skeptics felt the complaint would be overlooked, but it wasn’t. The FCC decided on June 2, 1967, that the Fairness Doctrine did apply in this case. In addition, it said the public should here the anti-smoking point of view <ref>Sterling, C. H., & Kittross, J. M. (1990). Stay Tuned: A concise history of American broadcasting (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.</ref>. The FCC's ] required broadcasters to provide free air time to opposing views of matters of public ]. Banzhaf argued that tobacco ]s were only showing one side of the story, and that as a public service the broadcast media should be required to show an equal number of anti-smoking messages. The FCC agreed, although they only required a ratio of one anti-smoking message for each four cigarette advertisements rather than the one-to-one ratio that Banzhaf had asked for. The ] appealed this decision, but it was upheld by the ] and the ] declined to hear the case. <ref name="CB" />{{Rp|32}}<ref name="Brandt"> | |||
In late 1966, John Banzhaf asked a local television station, WCBS-TV, to provide air time for announcements against smoking. The station refused, so Banzhaf filed a complaint with the ] (FCC) in 1967.<ref name=Mukherjee>], '']'', Fourth Estate, 2011, page 265-266.</ref> The FCC's fairness doctrine required broadcasters to provide free air time to opposing views of matters of public ]. In his complaint, Banzhaf argued that tobacco ]s were broadcasting only pro-smoking messages; he argued that, as a public service, the broadcasters should be required to show an equal number of anti-smoking messages.<ref name=Mukherjee/> | |||
{{cite book | last = Brandt | first = Allan M. | title = The Cigarette Century: the Rise, Fall and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America | publisher = Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group | location = New York | year = 2007 | isbn = 9780465070473 }}</ref>{{Rp|267–268}}<ref name="Kluger"> | |||
{{cite book | last = Kluger | first = Richard | authorlink = Richard Kluger | title = Ashes to Ashes: American's Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris | publisher = Vintage Books | location = New York | year = 1997 | isbn = 9780375700361 }}</ref>{{Rp|304–308}} “Various governmental and voluntary health organizations made extremely creative spots and provided them to stations <ref>Sterling, C. H., & Kittross, J. M. (1990). Stay Tuned: A concise history of American broadcasting (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.</ref>.” | |||
On June 2, 1967, the FCC announced its decision that its ] applied to the request for anti-smoking announcements. The FCC stated that the public should hear an anti-smoking viewpoint.<ref name=Sterling>Sterling, C. H., & Kittross, J. M. (1990). ''Stay Tuned: A concise history of American broadcasting'' (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.</ref> However, the FCC required only the ratio of one anti-smoking message for each four cigarette advertisements (not the one-to-one ratio suggested by Banzhaf). | |||
The tobacco industry eventually countered the flood of anti-smoking messages by voluntarily offering to stop advertising on ] completely, if they were made immune from ] action (for taking this concerted action) and in exchange for restrictions on the ] that appear on cigarette packages and in advertising. Television tobacco ads went off the air at the end of 1970, as did the free anti-smoking ads. Much of the cigarette advertising money shifted to print media.<ref name="Brandt" />{{Rp|271–272}}<ref name="Kluger" />{{Rp|327–335}} | |||
The ] appealed against this decision, but it was upheld by the ], and the ] declined to hear the case.<ref name=CB/>{{Rp|32}}<ref name=Brandt> | |||
Banzhaf and ASH next turned their attention to ].<ref name="Brandt" />{{Rp|287–288}} This started a fight for local and state ] ordinances that is still ongoing today. In 1969 ] petitioned the ] to ban smoking on all flights, and Banzhaf petitioned the FAA to require separate smoking and nonsmoking sections on domestic flights. ] at that time was thought to be only a nuisance and not a health hazard, and they were not able to get any action from the FAA. In 1972 they switched their attention to the ], who were more receptive and ordered the separate sections. Compliance was weak, and ASH sued the CAB in 1979 asking for better enforcement. When the ] came into office in 1981 even the weak CAB measures were rolled back.<ref name="Kluger" />{{Rp|373–374}} | |||
{{cite book | last = Brandt | first = Allan M. | title = The Cigarette Century: the Rise, Fall and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America | publisher = Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group | location = New York | year = 2007 | isbn = 978-0-465-07047-3 | url = https://archive.org/details/cigarettecentury00bran }}</ref>{{Rp|267–268}}<ref name=Kluger> | |||
{{cite book | last = Kluger | first = Richard | author-link = Richard Kluger | title = ''Ashes to Ashes: American's Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris'' | url = https://archive.org/details/ashesto_klu_1997_00_3999 | url-access = registration | publisher = Vintage Books | location = New York | year = 1997 | isbn = 978-0-375-70036-1 }}</ref>{{Rp|304–308}} "Various governmental and voluntary health organizations made extremely creative spots and provided them to stations."<ref name=Sterling/> In response, tobacco companies offered to stop all advertising on ], if this coordinated action was granted immunity from ] laws; they further agreed to have ] on cigarette packages and advertising. Tobacco ads ceased to appear on television in the United States at the end of 1970 (on January 1, 1971<ref name=Mukherjee/>). Cigarette advertising shifted to print media. Consequently, anti-smoking announcements were no longer required to satisfy the FCC's fairness doctrine.<ref name=Brandt/>{{Rp|271–272}}<ref name=Kluger/>{{Rp|327–335}} | |||
====Passive smoking==== | |||
In the late 1960s, Banzhaf and the ] worked against ].<ref name=Brandt/>{{Rp|287–288}} In 1969, ] had petitioned the ] to ] on all flights, when Banzhaf petitioned the FAA to require separate smoking and nonsmoking sections on domestic flights. Nader's petition and Banzhaf's petition each failed to change FAA policies, because ] had not yet been recognized as a serious health hazard. | |||
In 1972, both Nader and Banzhaf filed petitions with the ], which largely granted their petitions. However, many airlines failed fully to comply with the regulations. The Action on Smoking and Health sued the CAB in 1979, claiming that legally mandated enforcement was inadequate. When the ] came into office in 1981, it weakened enforcement of the previous CAB rules.<ref name=Kluger/>{{Rp|373–374}} | |||
===Obesity=== | ===Obesity=== | ||
{{See also|Obesity in the United States}} | |||
In recent years Banzhaf has switched his attention to ], prompted by a 2001 Surgeon General's report on the subject.<ref name="Hartford"> | |||
In the early 2000s, Banzhaf has focused his efforts against ], following the 2001 ]'s report on obesity.<ref name=Hartford> | |||
{{cite news |first=Rinker |last=Buck |title=George Washington University Professor Wages Legal War on 'Obesity Crisis' |work=Hartford Courant |id={{ISSN|1047-4153}} |date=2003-07-13 }}</ref> | |||
{{cite news |first=Rinker |last=Buck |title=George Washington University Professor Wages Legal War on 'Obesity Crisis' |work=] |issn=1047-4153 |date=2003-07-13 }}</ref> In particular, Banzhaf has criticized the contracts for ] machines in schools and ], alleging that both have helped to contribute to childhood obesity. | |||
In 2002 he filed a product liability suit against ], claiming that they contribute to ] through false advertising.<ref name="Brune" /> | |||
In 2003 Banzhaf began |
In 2003, Banzhaf began criticizing "pouring rights" contracts, which he called "Cokes for Kickbacks" contracts. Under these contracts with ]s, soft drink companies place ] in schools; the districts receive a ] on the sales. Banzhaf has written that such contracts have increased soft-drink consumption and thereby contributed to the epidemic of ].<ref name=Brune/><ref> | ||
{{cite news |first=Ervin |last=Keith |title=School Board is warned against Coke contract |url= |
{{cite news |first=Ervin |last=Keith |title=School Board is warned against Coke contract |url=https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/20030702/fatsuit02m/school-board-is-warned-against-coke-contract |work=] |issn=0745-9696 |date=2003-07-02 |access-date=2008-08-10 }} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
In his advocacy against childhood obesity, Banzhaf has criticized McDonald's. In 2002, he filed a lawsuit claiming ] against McDonald's, claiming that false advertising by McDonald's contributes to childhood obesity.<ref name=Brune/> Obesity and McDonald's were discussed in the 2004 film '']'' by ], in which Banzhaf is repeatedly interviewed. In one scene, Spurlock and Banzhaf have a discussion while eating at McDonald's. In his 2005 book, Spurlock quoted Banzhaf's explanation of why litigious campaigns have had more success than legislative campaigns:<ref name=Spurlock> | |||
Banzhaf likens the obesity problem to the tobacco problem, saying, <ref name="Spurlock"> | |||
{{cite book | last = Spurlock | first = Morgan | |
{{cite book | last = Spurlock | first = Morgan | author-link = Morgan Spurlock | title = Don't Eat This Book | publisher = G.P. Putnam's Sons | location = New York | year = 2005 | isbn = 0-399-15260-1 | url = https://archive.org/details/donteatthisbookf00spur_0 }}</ref>{{Rp|91}} | ||
{{quote|The problem of passing litigation over the objections of a very powerful industry with a big pocketbook is exactly what we faced with Big Tobacco and smoking....I and every one of the attorneys and public health experts I'm working with would much rather see this go through legislation then litigation. Our motto is, 'If the legislators don't legislate, then the litigators will litigate.'}} | |||
{{quote|The problem of passing litigation over the objections of a very powerful industry with a big pocketbook is exactly what we faced with Big Tobacco and smoking. ... I and every one of the attorneys and public health experts I'm working with would much rather see this go through legislation then {{sic}} litigation. Our motto is, "If the legislators don't legislate, then the litigators will litigate."}} | |||
Banzhaf was one of the interviewees in the 2004 film ] and made several brief appearances in that film, including a scene of Banzhaf and director ] eating at ]. | |||
== |
===Politics=== | ||
Banzhaf filed a complaint with the Maryland's Attorney Grievance Commission against Prosecutor ], the ] of ], saying she did not have ] to charge six officers in the ], and also that she repeatedly withheld ] from the officers' defense attorneys.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> He compared her to ] and his handling of the ].<ref name=":4" /> | |||
There has been much criticism of Banzhaf's work and of Banzhaf personally. | |||
====Richard Nixon==== | |||
Many critics are uneasy about his use of litigation. ], executive director of the ], a food ], said, "He's using the judicial process for PR value."<ref> | |||
Banzhaf filed a motion requesting that the federal government appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the role of the White House in what became known as the ]. ] history professor ] stated that Banzhaf "was the first to seriously raise the issue in a public way. He certainly put it in the minds of members of Congress and was a contributing factor," despite that the motion was denied, in establishing a path for the appointment of future special prosecutors, which then led to the resignation of ].<ref></ref> | |||
{{cite news |first=Ameet |last=Sachdev |title=Obesity case ruling whets appetite of food activist |url=http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-9004062_ITM |work=Chicago Tribune |id={{ISSN|1085-6706}} |date=2008-01-03 |accessdate=2008-08-10 }} | |||
</ref> | |||
], president of the conservative ] ] said "He's abusing the court system".<ref name="Brune" /> | |||
====Spiro Agnew==== | |||
Banzhaf has been accused of ignoring or destroying the concept of personal responsibility. For example, in 2006 Ezra Levant wrote in the '']'', "Banzhaf was the health-law strategist who destroyed the concept of personal responsibility when it came to smoking."<ref> | |||
Following publication his memoir, ''Go Quietly'', former vice president ] gave a rare television interview in 1980,<ref name=NYTobit>{{cite news |title=Spiro T. Agnew, Ex-Vice President, Dies at 77 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/18/us/spiro-t-agnew-ex-vice-president-dies-at-77.html |newspaper=] |date=September 18, 1996 |access-date=February 10, 2021 |archive-date=August 21, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170821165903/http://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/18/us/spiro-t-agnew-ex-vice-president-dies-at-77.html |url-status=live }}</ref> after which Banzhaf's students located three Maryland residents, who sought to have Agnew pay the state $268,482, in repayment for ] that he was alleged to have received while in office. In 1981, a judge ruled that "Mr. Agnew had no lawful right to this money under any theory," and ordered restitution as $147,500 in bribes and $101,235 in interest.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/04/28/agnew-told-to-pay-state-248735-for-funds-he-accepted/1f336d8f-4a68-4191-8cd4-56ed640d021f/|title=Agnew Told to Pay State $248,735 for Funds He Accepted|last=Saperstein|first=Saundra|date=April 28, 1981|newspaper=]|access-date=February 10, 2021 |language=en-US|issn=0190-8286|archive-date=October 18, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191018225621/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/04/28/agnew-told-to-pay-state-248735-for-funds-he-accepted/1f336d8f-4a68-4191-8cd4-56ed640d021f/|url-status=live}}</ref> After two unsuccessful appeals by Agnew, he finally paid the sum in 1983.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/05/us/agnew-gives-268482-check-to-maryland-in-graft-lawsuit.html |title=Agnew Gives $268,482 Check to Maryland in Graft Lawsuit |newspaper=The New York Times |agency=] |date=January 5, 1983 |access-date=February 10, 2021 |archive-date=June 13, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180613001347/https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/05/us/agnew-gives-268482-check-to-maryland-in-graft-lawsuit.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In 1989, Agnew applied unsuccessfully for this sum to be treated as tax deductible.<ref>{{cite news |last=Clines |first=Francis X. |title=Spiro T. Agnew, Point Man for Nixon Who Resigned Vice Presidency, Dies at 77 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/19/us/spiro-t-agnew-point-man-for-nixon-who-resigned-vice-presidency-dies-at-77.html |newspaper=The New York Times |date=September 19, 1996 |access-date=February 10, 2021 |archive-date=September 7, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907222950/http://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/19/us/spiro-t-agnew-point-man-for-nixon-who-resigned-vice-presidency-dies-at-77.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
{{cite news |first=Ezra |last=Levant |title=The killjoys' next target |url=http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=585ffc2c-18ca-4135-b94a-e69a726c8408 |work=National Post |id={{ISSN|1486-8008}} |date=2006-01-06 |accessdate=2008-08-10 }}</ref> | |||
But Banzhaf denies that there has been any loss of personal responsibility. He was quoted in 2003 in the '']'' saying, <ref name="Hartford" /> | |||
{{quote|Is there a sudden loss of personal responsibility? No—because we would see it in other areas: sudden increases in drunkenness, teenage pregnancy, drug abuse deaths. Clearly there is no decline in personal responsibility.}} | |||
====Donald Trump==== | |||
Writer ] is critical of Banzhaf's organizational skills, saying that he has failed to build up ] as a strong organization because he was unwilling to share the spotlight with others, and that ASH was a vehicle for Banzhaf to make appearances before Congress and on television.<ref name="Kluger" />{{Rp|310,506}} | |||
In December 2020, complaints written to Georgia state authorities by Banzhaf charged that, while ], ] appeared to violate three Georgia penal codes during a leaked and subsequently widely publicized ] of January 2, 2021, with Georgia ] ]. Banzhaf cited Conspiracy to Commit Election Fraud (§ 21-2-603), Criminal Solicitation to Commit Election Fraud (§ 21-2-604), and Intentional Interference With Performance of Election Duties (§ 21-2-597) during the January 2, 2021 call; the complaints resulted in two criminal investigations by the ] ].<ref>, '']'', January 4, 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2021.</ref> | |||
==Criticisms== | |||
Adrian Brune, writing in 2005 in '']'', said that Banzhaf's chief legal foe is the ]'s ].<ref name="Brune"> | |||
Banzhaf's advocacy has drawn criticism. In 2006, ] wrote in the '']'', "Banzhaf was the health-law strategist who destroyed the concept of personal responsibility when it came to smoking."<ref> | |||
{{cite journal | |||
{{cite news |first=Ezra |last=Levant |title=The killjoys' next target |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=585ffc2c-18ca-4135-b94a-e69a726c8408 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130129144419/http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=585ffc2c-18ca-4135-b94a-e69a726c8408 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2013-01-29 |work=National Post |issn=1486-8008 |date=2006-01-06 |accessdate=2008-08-10 }}</ref> | |||
| last = Brune | |||
| first = Adrian | |||
| year = 2005 | |||
| month = July | |||
| title = Class Action: A litigious law professor preps for fight over soda sales at schools | |||
| journal = American Lawyer | |||
| volume = 27 | |||
| issue = 7 | |||
| pages = 33–34 | |||
| issn = 0162-3397 | |||
}} | |||
</ref> | |||
A few years ago the Institute launched a web site, banzhafwatch.com, devoted to recording all available information about Banzhaf and his activities.<ref name="Brune" /> The site's slogan was "Keeping an eye on the man who wants to sue America". The site went inactive in mid-2006,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://banzhafwatch.com |accessdate=2008-08-09 |title=archive of banzhafwatch.com |publisher=Internet Archive Wayback Machine }}</ref> | |||
and the Institute may have lost interest in Banzhaf. | |||
Addressing the charge that his legal campaigns and victories have reduced personal responsibility, according to the '']'', Banzhaf replied with a rhetorical question:<ref name="Hartford" /> | |||
'']'', a libertarian magazine, gives Banzhaf much critical attention. For example, in a 2002 article, Charles Paul Freund wrote that Banzhaf did not win any victories over the tobacco companies, that he specializes in "using the courts to hurt relatively powerless people," and that the issue for Banzhaf is "the terrifying possibility that somewhere there are people enjoying themselves." | |||
<ref> | |||
{{cite journal | |||
| last = Freund | |||
| first = Charles Paul | |||
| year = 2002 | |||
| month = December | |||
| title = Stuffed Face: One man's war on pleasure | |||
| journal = Reason | |||
| pages = 12–13 | |||
| issn = 0048-6906 | |||
| url = http://www.reason.com/news/show/28596.html | |||
}} | |||
</ref> | |||
{{quote|Is there a sudden loss of personal responsibility? No—because we would see it in other areas: sudden increases in drunkenness, teenage pregnancy, drug abuse deaths. Clearly there is no decline in personal responsibility.}} | |||
Pro-smoking websites and blogs such as FORCES<ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://www.forces.org/ |title=The FORCES International Liberty News Network |accessdate=2008-08-10 |work= |publisher=FORCES International |date= }}</ref> | |||
Banzhaf was criticized<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/campaign-against-catholic-university/2011/11/03/gIQAqszLqM_story.html | newspaper=The Washington Post | first=Charles | last=Krauthammer | date=2011-11-05 | title=Campaign against Catholic University}}</ref> for his 2011 lawsuits and Human Rights charges against the ]. The first was a gender-discrimination lawsuit in response to President ]'s decision to implement same sex dorms on campus. Later in 2011, Banzhaf filed a complaint with the DC Office of Human Rights claiming ] students were being discriminated against because of lack of adequate prayer space. According to Banzhaf, the charge came as a response to a 2010 article in CUA's student newspaper about Muslim students at CUA, in which no complaints were made. | |||
carry much critical comment about Banzhaf. | |||
Adrian Brune wrote in '']'' (2005) that Banzhaf had had conflicts with the ],<ref name=Brune>{{cite journal | last = Brune | first = Adrian |date=July 2005 | title = Class Action: A litigious law professor preps for fight over soda sales at schools | journal = ] | volume = 27 | issue = 7 | pages = 33–34 | issn = 0162-3397 }}</ref> which operated a website, banzhafwatch.com,<ref name=Brune/> with the slogan "Keeping an eye on the man who wants to sue America," until mid-2006.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://banzhafwatch.com/ |accessdate=July 28, 2016 |title=archive of banzhafwatch.com (April 2006) |publisher=] |work=] |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060402185616/http://banzhafwatch.com/ |archive-date=April 2, 2006 }}</ref> '']'', a ] magazine, published a critical article by Charles Paul Freund in 2002.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Freund | first = Charles Paul |date=December 2002 | title = Stuffed Face: One man's war on pleasure | journal = ] | pages = 12–13 | issn = 0048-6906 | url = http://www.reason.com/news/show/28596.html }}</ref> Writer ] criticized Banzhaf's leadership of the ].<ref name=Kluger/>{{Rp|310,506}} | |||
Recently, the anti Banzhaf website reopened. Originally known as Banzhafwatch.com, it was taken offline back in 2006, resurfacing in 2009, although no longer run by Frontiers of Freedom Institute. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | * ] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes and references== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
<references /> | |||
<!-- Metadata: see ] --> | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Persondata | |||
* Includes power index estimates for the 1990s U.S. Electoral College. | |||
|NAME = Banzhaf III, John Francis | |||
* Web-based algorithms for voting power analysis | |||
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES = | |||
* {{C-SPAN|1008}} | |||
|SHORT DESCRIPTION = law professor and legal activist | |||
|DATE OF BIRTH = July 2, 1940 | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
|PLACE OF BIRTH = ] | |||
{{Portal bar|Biography|Law|United States}} | |||
|DATE OF DEATH = | |||
|PLACE OF DEATH = | |||
}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Banzhaf III, John F.}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Banzhaf III, John F.}} | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 10:15, 1 January 2025
American law professor (born 1940)John Banzhaf | |
---|---|
Born | John Francis Banzhaf III (1940-07-02) July 2, 1940 (age 84) New York City |
Education | BSEE, JD |
Alma mater | Stuyvesant High School Massachusetts Institute of Technology Columbia University Law School |
Occupation | Professor |
Employer | George Washington University Law School |
Known for | litigation |
Website | banzhaf |
John Francis Banzhaf III (/ˈbænz.hɑːf/; born July 2, 1940) is an American public interest lawyer, legal activist, and law professor at the George Washington University Law School. He is the founder of an antismoking advocacy group, Action on Smoking and Health. He is noted for his advocacy and use of lawsuits as a method to promote what he believes is the public interest.
Life and education
Banzhaf was born July 2, 1940, in New York City. He graduated at the age of 15 from Manhattan's Stuyvesant High School, one of the three academically elite high schools of the New York City Public School System. He went on to graduate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and from Columbia Law School with a Juris Doctor.
Contributions to law and public policy
Freddie Gray complaint
Banzhaf filed a complaint with the Maryland's Attorney Grievance Commission against Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby, the state's attorney of Baltimore, saying she did not have probable cause to charge six officers in the death of Freddie Gray, and also that she repeatedly withheld evidence from the officers' defense attorneys. He compared her to Mike Nifong and his handling of the Duke lacrosse case.
Copyright of computer software
Banzhaf got an early start in legal advocacy. While still a student in law school, he was assigned to research and draft a note for the Columbia Law Review on whether computer programs and other software could be protected under U.S. copyright law. The United States Patent Office had previously declined to grant any patents on software, and no computer program copyrights had ever been recognized. As part of his research, Banzhaf sought to register copyrights on two programs he had written: one in printed form, and the other recorded on magnetic tape. In 1964, the United States Copyright Office registered two copyrights of Banzhaf, thereby recognizing for the first time the validity of this new form of legal protection.
One year later, he testified at a congressional hearing at which he urged, ultimately successfully, that the long-awaited revision of US copyright law should expressly recognize computer and data processing issues.
Measuring the power of voting blocs in a committee
Main article: Banzhaf power index See also: Shapley–Shubik power index, Shapley value, and Cooperative game theoryBanzhaf studied the Nassau County Board's voting system, which allocated the total of 30 votes to its municipalities as follows:
- Hempstead #1: 9
- Hempstead #2: 9
- North Hempstead: 7
- Oyster Bay: 3
- Glen Cove: 1
- Long Beach: 1
A simple majority of 16 votes sufficed to win a vote.
In Banzhaf's notation, are A-F in
There are 32 winning coalitions, and 48 swing votes:
AB AC BC ABC ABD ABE ABF ACD ACE ACF BCD BCE BCF ABCD ABCE ABCF ABDE ABDF ABEF ACDE ACDF ACEF BCDE BCDF BCEF ABCDE ABCDF ABCEF ABDEF ACDEF BCDEF ABCDEF
Banzhaf proposed an index, now known as the "Banzhaf index", to measure the power of each municipality:
- Hempstead #1 = 1/3
- Hempstead #2 = 1/3
- North Hempstead = 1/3
- Oyster Bay = 0
- Glen Cove = 0
- Long Beach = 0
Banzhaf argued that a voting arrangement that gives zero power to one-sixth of the county's population is unfair and sued the board. The Banzhaf power index has been used as a way to measure voting power, along with the Shapley–Shubik power index.
Teaching
Banzhaf has used a clinical-project format in some of his law classes, rather than a more traditional lecture and academic study format. Students are divided into teams and asked to work on some genuine consumer problems.
One of the students' high-profile projects was a suit against former Vice-President Spiro Agnew seeking to force Agnew to repay the bribes he accepted while Governor of Maryland. Agnew was ordered to repay the state the $147,500 in kickbacks, with interest of $101,235, for a total of $248,735. The project was started in 1976 by three students in Banzhaf's class on public interest law. The students recruited three Maryland residents to carry the suit.
Another case that attracted much attention targeted the McDonald's restaurant chain. One of Banzhaf's students, James Pizzirusso, successfully sued McDonald's in 2001 for precooking their French fries in beef fat and not warning vegetarians and beef avoiders about it; in 2002, Pizzirusso won a class-action settlement of $12.5 million.
Five students in Banzhaf’s public interest law class took on an environmental case that set U.S. Supreme Court precedent on “standing” in 1973, persisting for over 50 years. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) was also the first full court consideration of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In December 1971, the students, led by SCRAP chair and third-year student Neil Thomas Proto, filed a petition with the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) seeking a $1 billion refund for the failure of the commission to comply with NEPA. The students argued that the ICC failed to comply with NEPA in approving a 20 percent railroad freight rate increase that the students claimed discriminated against the movement of recyclable materials by favoring the movement of raw materials.
Tobacco
Much of Banzhaf's tobacco work has been done through the Action on Smoking and Health, a nonprofit he founded in 1967.
Television advertising
In late 1966, John Banzhaf asked a local television station, WCBS-TV, to provide air time for announcements against smoking. The station refused, so Banzhaf filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1967. The FCC's fairness doctrine required broadcasters to provide free air time to opposing views of matters of public controversy. In his complaint, Banzhaf argued that tobacco advertisements were broadcasting only pro-smoking messages; he argued that, as a public service, the broadcasters should be required to show an equal number of anti-smoking messages.
On June 2, 1967, the FCC announced its decision that its fairness doctrine applied to the request for anti-smoking announcements. The FCC stated that the public should hear an anti-smoking viewpoint. However, the FCC required only the ratio of one anti-smoking message for each four cigarette advertisements (not the one-to-one ratio suggested by Banzhaf).
The tobacco industry appealed against this decision, but it was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case. "Various governmental and voluntary health organizations made extremely creative spots and provided them to stations." In response, tobacco companies offered to stop all advertising on television, if this coordinated action was granted immunity from antitrust laws; they further agreed to have warning labels on cigarette packages and advertising. Tobacco ads ceased to appear on television in the United States at the end of 1970 (on January 1, 1971). Cigarette advertising shifted to print media. Consequently, anti-smoking announcements were no longer required to satisfy the FCC's fairness doctrine.
Passive smoking
In the late 1960s, Banzhaf and the Action on Smoking and Health worked against passive smoking. In 1969, Ralph Nader had petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration to ban smoking on all flights, when Banzhaf petitioned the FAA to require separate smoking and nonsmoking sections on domestic flights. Nader's petition and Banzhaf's petition each failed to change FAA policies, because passive smoking had not yet been recognized as a serious health hazard.
In 1972, both Nader and Banzhaf filed petitions with the Civil Aeronautics Board, which largely granted their petitions. However, many airlines failed fully to comply with the regulations. The Action on Smoking and Health sued the CAB in 1979, claiming that legally mandated enforcement was inadequate. When the Reagan administration came into office in 1981, it weakened enforcement of the previous CAB rules.
Obesity
See also: Obesity in the United StatesIn the early 2000s, Banzhaf has focused his efforts against obesity, following the 2001 Surgeon General's report on obesity. In particular, Banzhaf has criticized the contracts for soft drink machines in schools and McDonald's, alleging that both have helped to contribute to childhood obesity.
In 2003, Banzhaf began criticizing "pouring rights" contracts, which he called "Cokes for Kickbacks" contracts. Under these contracts with school districts, soft drink companies place vending machines in schools; the districts receive a commission on the sales. Banzhaf has written that such contracts have increased soft-drink consumption and thereby contributed to the epidemic of childhood obesity.
In his advocacy against childhood obesity, Banzhaf has criticized McDonald's. In 2002, he filed a lawsuit claiming product liability against McDonald's, claiming that false advertising by McDonald's contributes to childhood obesity. Obesity and McDonald's were discussed in the 2004 film Super Size Me by Morgan Spurlock, in which Banzhaf is repeatedly interviewed. In one scene, Spurlock and Banzhaf have a discussion while eating at McDonald's. In his 2005 book, Spurlock quoted Banzhaf's explanation of why litigious campaigns have had more success than legislative campaigns:
The problem of passing litigation over the objections of a very powerful industry with a big pocketbook is exactly what we faced with Big Tobacco and smoking. ... I and every one of the attorneys and public health experts I'm working with would much rather see this go through legislation then [sic] litigation. Our motto is, "If the legislators don't legislate, then the litigators will litigate."
Politics
Banzhaf filed a complaint with the Maryland's Attorney Grievance Commission against Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby, the state's attorney of Baltimore, saying she did not have probable cause to charge six officers in the death of Freddie Gray, and also that she repeatedly withheld evidence from the officers' defense attorneys. He compared her to Mike Nifong and his handling of the Duke lacrosse case.
Richard Nixon
Banzhaf filed a motion requesting that the federal government appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the role of the White House in what became known as the Watergate scandal. American University history professor Allan Lichtman stated that Banzhaf "was the first to seriously raise the issue in a public way. He certainly put it in the minds of members of Congress and was a contributing factor," despite that the motion was denied, in establishing a path for the appointment of future special prosecutors, which then led to the resignation of Richard Nixon.
Spiro Agnew
Following publication his memoir, Go Quietly, former vice president Spiro Agnew gave a rare television interview in 1980, after which Banzhaf's students located three Maryland residents, who sought to have Agnew pay the state $268,482, in repayment for kickbacks that he was alleged to have received while in office. In 1981, a judge ruled that "Mr. Agnew had no lawful right to this money under any theory," and ordered restitution as $147,500 in bribes and $101,235 in interest. After two unsuccessful appeals by Agnew, he finally paid the sum in 1983. In 1989, Agnew applied unsuccessfully for this sum to be treated as tax deductible.
Donald Trump
In December 2020, complaints written to Georgia state authorities by Banzhaf charged that, while President of the United States, Donald J. Trump appeared to violate three Georgia penal codes during a leaked and subsequently widely publicized phone call of January 2, 2021, with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Banzhaf cited Conspiracy to Commit Election Fraud (§ 21-2-603), Criminal Solicitation to Commit Election Fraud (§ 21-2-604), and Intentional Interference With Performance of Election Duties (§ 21-2-597) during the January 2, 2021 call; the complaints resulted in two criminal investigations by the Fulton County district attorney.
Criticisms
Banzhaf's advocacy has drawn criticism. In 2006, Ezra Levant wrote in the National Post, "Banzhaf was the health-law strategist who destroyed the concept of personal responsibility when it came to smoking."
Addressing the charge that his legal campaigns and victories have reduced personal responsibility, according to the Hartford Courant, Banzhaf replied with a rhetorical question:
Is there a sudden loss of personal responsibility? No—because we would see it in other areas: sudden increases in drunkenness, teenage pregnancy, drug abuse deaths. Clearly there is no decline in personal responsibility.
Banzhaf was criticized for his 2011 lawsuits and Human Rights charges against the Catholic University of America (CUA). The first was a gender-discrimination lawsuit in response to President John H. Garvey's decision to implement same sex dorms on campus. Later in 2011, Banzhaf filed a complaint with the DC Office of Human Rights claiming Muslim students were being discriminated against because of lack of adequate prayer space. According to Banzhaf, the charge came as a response to a 2010 article in CUA's student newspaper about Muslim students at CUA, in which no complaints were made.
Adrian Brune wrote in American Lawyer (2005) that Banzhaf had had conflicts with the Frontiers of Freedom Institute, which operated a website, banzhafwatch.com, with the slogan "Keeping an eye on the man who wants to sue America," until mid-2006. Reason, a libertarian magazine, published a critical article by Charles Paul Freund in 2002. Writer Richard Kluger criticized Banzhaf's leadership of the Action on Smoking and Health.
See also
Notes and references
- "GW Law Profiles - John F. Banzhaf III". George Washington University Law School. Archived from the original on 2011-12-16. Retrieved 2008-08-02.
- ^ "Banzhaf, John F(rancis), 3d". Current Biography Yearbook. H. W. Wilson. 1973. pp. 30–33.
- "John F. Banzhaf III - GW Law - The George Washington University". law.gwu.edu. Retrieved 3 July 2016.
- "PROFESSOR JOHN F. BANZHAF III". banzhaf.net. Archived from the original on 7 May 2016. Retrieved 3 July 2016.
- "THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL". martindale.com. Martindale-Hubbell. Archived from the original on 28 May 2016. Retrieved 3 July 2016.
JOHN F. BANZHAF, (Law Professor), born 1940; admitted to bar, 1965, New York; 1966, District of Columbia. Education: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (B.S.E.E., 1962); Columbia University (J.D., 1965). COURSES:Administrative Law, Law and the Disabled, Legal Activism, Torts.
- ^ "Law Professor Files Complaint Against Mosby". wbal.com. Retrieved 2 July 2016.
- ^ Abell, Jeff (29 June 2016). "Mosby draws criticism". foxbaltimore.com. Retrieved 2 July 2016.
- ^ "George Washington law professor files complaint against Marilyn Mosby". Associated Press. 30 June 2016. Archived from the original on 1 July 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2016 – via abc2news.com.
- ^ "Activist law professor calls for Mosby disbarment over prosecution in Freddie Gray case". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved 2 July 2016.
- ^ "Law professor goes after Maryland prosecutor for Freddie Gray case". Fox News. August 2016.
- Banzhaf, John. "Copyright Protection for Computer Programs." 64 Colum. L. Rev. 1274 (1964)
- "Computer Program Copyrighted for First Time; Columbia Law Student Gets Approval For Plans – Sees Wide Industry Impact." New York Times: May 8, 1964.
- "The Law Professor Behind: ASH, SOUP, PUMP and CRASH." New York Times: August 23, 1970. http://banzhaf.net/docs/NYTimesBehindASHSoup.pdf
- Hearings on H.R. 4347, H.R. 5680, H.R. 6831 and H.R. 6835 before Subcomm. No. 3 of the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 1144-50 (statement and testimony of John F. Banzhaf III), 1898-99.
- Banzhaf, John F. (1965), "Weighted voting doesn't work: A mathematical analysis", Rutgers Law Review, 19 (2): 317–343
- Straffin, Philip D. (5 September 1996). Game Theory and Strategy. New Mathematical Library. The Mathematical Association of America. ISBN 0-88385-637-9.
- Lehrer, Ehud (1988), "An axiomatization of the Banzhaf value", International Journal of Game Theory, 17 (2): 89–99, doi:10.1007/BF01254541, S2CID 189830513
- Moulin, Herve (1988), Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making (1st ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-42458-5
- Owen, Guillermo (1995), Game Theory (3rd ed.), San Diego: Academic Press, ISBN 0-12-531151-6
- Steven Brams, William F. Lucas and Philip D. Straffin, Jr., Modules in Applied Mathematics: Political and Related Models, vol. 2. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983. This volume has several essays discussing the Banzhaf index.
- Franklin, Ben A. (1981-04-28). "Court says Agnew took bribes; orders repayment". New York Times.
- ^ Brune, Adrian (July 2005). "Class Action: A litigious law professor preps for fight over soda sales at schools". American Lawyer. 27 (7): 33–34. ISSN 0162-3397.
- DeLauro, Rosa (November 30, 2023). "Recognizing Neil Thomas Proto on the 50th Anniversary of the United States of America v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures" (PDF). Congressional Record. pp. E1146.
- Proto, Neil Thomas (2023). To a High Court: Five Bold Law Students Challenge Corporate Greed and Change the Law. FriesenPress.
- ^ Siddhartha Mukherjee, The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer, Fourth Estate, 2011, page 265-266.
- ^ Sterling, C. H., & Kittross, J. M. (1990). Stay Tuned: A concise history of American broadcasting (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- ^ Brandt, Allan M. (2007). The Cigarette Century: the Rise, Fall and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America. New York: Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group. ISBN 978-0-465-07047-3.
- ^ Kluger, Richard (1997). Ashes to Ashes: American's Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-375-70036-1.
- ^ Buck, Rinker (2003-07-13). "George Washington University Professor Wages Legal War on 'Obesity Crisis'". Hartford Courant. ISSN 1047-4153.
- Keith, Ervin (2003-07-02). "School Board is warned against Coke contract". Seattle Times. ISSN 0745-9696. Retrieved 2008-08-10.
- Spurlock, Morgan (2005). Don't Eat This Book. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. ISBN 0-399-15260-1.
- "Law professor reflects on his role in Nixon’s resignation", by Mary Ellen McIntire, The GW Hatchet, August 21, 2014. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
- "Spiro T. Agnew, Ex-Vice President, Dies at 77". The New York Times. September 18, 1996. Archived from the original on August 21, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
- Saperstein, Saundra (April 28, 1981). "Agnew Told to Pay State $248,735 for Funds He Accepted". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 18, 2019. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
- "Agnew Gives $268,482 Check to Maryland in Graft Lawsuit". The New York Times. UPI. January 5, 1983. Archived from the original on June 13, 2018. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
- Clines, Francis X. (September 19, 1996). "Spiro T. Agnew, Point Man for Nixon Who Resigned Vice Presidency, Dies at 77". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 7, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
- "Lawyer calls for conspiracy investigation over Trump’s Georgia phone call", by Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner, January 4, 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
- Levant, Ezra (2006-01-06). "The killjoys' next target". National Post. ISSN 1486-8008. Archived from the original on 2013-01-29. Retrieved 2008-08-10.
- Krauthammer, Charles (2011-11-05). "Campaign against Catholic University". The Washington Post.
- "archive of banzhafwatch.com (April 2006)". Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 2, 2006. Retrieved July 28, 2016.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - Freund, Charles Paul (December 2002). "Stuffed Face: One man's war on pleasure". Reason: 12–13. ISSN 0048-6906.
External links
- Banzhaf Power Index Includes power index estimates for the 1990s U.S. Electoral College.
- Computer Algorithms for Voting Power Analysis Web-based algorithms for voting power analysis
- Appearances on C-SPAN