| Revision as of 11:42, 27 July 2011 editFakTNeviM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,319 edits sth.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:46, 25 August 2024 edit undoClovermoss (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators30,581 edits →A barnstar for you!: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{User_talk:Jeffro77/Year tabs|This=1}} | ||
| {{User_talk:Jeffro77/tabs|This=1}} | |||
| | | ||
| {{User_talk}} | {{User_talk}} | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
| | | | | ||
| <div style="border:1px solid #000000; background: #fff; border-right:2px solid #365F91; border-bottom:2px solid #365F91; text-align: center; padding:1px; float:right; line-height: 1.3; margin-right: 1px;"> | <div style="border:1px solid #000000; background: #fff; border-right:2px solid #365F91; border-bottom:2px solid #365F91; text-align: center; padding:1px; float:right; line-height: 1.3; margin-right: 1px;"> | ||
| <center> | <div class="center"> | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| </ |
</div> | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!--End TOC--> | <!--End TOC--> | ||
| == Tables == | |||
| Hello, it's me, Junkönig. I wanted to let you know that I agree with you that two tables at the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society article are not necessary. However, I consider the new one more orderly. And you can see the length of tenures and notable positions below. So, I am in favour of including just the new one instead of both or Just the old one. ] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 19:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| :Just the one table is good. I'm happy with the new replacement table. Thanks. :)--] <span style="padding:2px 4px;background-color:#eee;color:#000;border:1px solid #000;font-size:12px;border-radius:4px;">]</span> 09:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <nowiki>This barnstar is given to You as my grateful appreciation for your tireless contributing in former times and by adding special flavor to WP:JW community, particularly with civility, racional arguments, useful style of cooperation and doing minor, but many specific acts toward better future and higher quality of articles in English Misplaced Pages.</nowiki> ] (]) 17:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == Please, read it with heart == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| <nowiki>(Template:uw-npa3)</nowiki> | |||
| <nowiki>(Template:Uw-advert2)</nowiki> | |||
| <nowiki>(Template:uw-socialnetwork)</nowiki> | |||
| <nowiki>(Template:uw-delete4)</nowiki> | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| These are my personal! messages for you. Please respect others. I finished that !chat! <nowiki></nowiki>. I leaved from my house. And after less than 20 minutes you despite that, continued talking. And start <nowiki></nowiki> on me. I was forced to defend myself and you, you not waited for anything, just stronger pressure and still! talking. My only fault was I defend myself. Why did you still attacking on me? Do you have to win every time? Is there any personal problem? Why did you just can´t listen to me and stop with talk, when I stop talk. See that ref. I finished talk first, but you still continued. I wanted to cancel discussion before it could be dangerous and uncivil. But, this was preciously, what you wanted a searched for. Again. You won. Are you glad? | |||
| ⚫ | == A barnstar for you! == | ||
| --] (]) 14:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :'''You''' said at the Talk page that ''you'' would stop discussing the issue. If ''you'' choose to stop discussing something, that '''does not''' mean that I am not allowed to reply. And then ''you'' chose to continue discussion. If '''you''' don't want to discuss something, simply '''don't'''. Additionally, you made a personal attack immediately prior to saying you would 'stop' discussing. And then you retributively added false warnings to my User page, and made a false allegation of vandalism. And you claim that I misused Talk pages for 'Chat' when you have a subpage specifically for chatting with another editor in user space.--] (]) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| ::I am just so much tired from Misplaced Pages and I don´t want to even ´read´ your response. I have my wikibreak. Respect it. --] (]) 10:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| ::In my user space I can do what I wish and you have no right to reproach my personal chat in my user space with Lighthead. Huge difference among your public chat on main article´s talk page, what is in encyclopedic part and fully public. You should be ashamed of your spying on me. You should be ashamed for that. It was vile (not only uncivil) from you. --] (]) 10:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | |||
| :::Actually, the use of 'your' userspace is also governed by various Misplaced Pages guidelines, and it is not acceptable to use it for lengthy 'chatting' that is not related to Misplaced Pages. See ]; the same guidelines apply to subpages. Accessing a user's subpages is not 'spying'. After you posted false warnings on my User page, it was entirely appropriate that I check whether you were doing anything else inappropriate against me.--] (]) 11:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I appreciate your diligence in checking edits made to JW articles (especially mine!). In a topic area with few contributors, your dedication shines through. ] ] 22:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Your´s and BlackCab´s user pages are much more preaching (=in fact, propagandistic and hatred). In my user page is nothing about my personal ideas and values. Only interests about Misplaced Pages topics there on my user page. | |||
| |} | |||
| ::::User space (not User Page) should be primarily for creating (mocked) encyclopedic content. However, we already discuss him also several Misplaced Pages-like issues. | |||
| ::::Again, you have nor right to spying on me (like stupid big brother) and you have no right to reproach my personal issues, when +you, +your pages, +your edits, preach much much more, than my quiet non-public conversion. There is huge difference between your hypocrisy, frivolous nature, public loathing on me and others, and between my own attitude, what is greatly reverse than yours. | |||
| ::::] (]) 11:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I thought about our relation many times ago. I found there is something mutually disagreeable between us. Our problems are not about big differences in a worldview, but inside, in personality. Our sort of personality are absolutely incompatible. Every time we have factual talk about topic at the beginning, but finishing in a quarrel. We need ] with every issue solving next time. I found BlackCab´s replies on me always more factual, informative, more expected type of information in response, better attitude of cooperation even with those who don´t agree with him, which sometimes includes both of us. But, between you and me, this is not working at all. We always finishing in a quarrel. Next time, when I need to ask someone from WP:JW project to any issue, I´ll rather contact him or other man, because contact between us just does not work. | |||
| --] (]) 18:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :It is often difficult to interpret your broken English, and that may be a large part of the problem. However, in this instance, you were simply wrong.--] (]) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I also appreciate the change of the section heading away from the vague classification of 'persecution'.--] <span style="padding:2px 4px;background-color:#eee;color:#000;border:1px solid #000;font-size:12px;border-radius:4px;">]</span> 22:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am glad you finally ´start trying to interpret´ my thoughts. Previously you was disrespect, mocking, haughty, lofty Englishman. Now, you finally ´try to´ (and not still lazy as previous) at least. Wow! You did some personality progress since that times. --] (]) 10:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's something I had considered doing for awhile but the recent content about Norway has definitely convinced me that it is a good idea. ] ] 00:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::There is no need for condescension. My approach has not changed. I realise you are not a native speaker of English, but your disregard for various Misplaced Pages guidelines was not dependent on your knowledge of English. | |||
| :::I am not an Englishman.--] (]) 11:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::From my POV, you are ´Englishman´, because you are native English speaker from Australia. Everyone, who is from USA, Canada, Australia, Great Britain, or from thousands of other places (colonies of British Empire), everyone such is for me ´Englishman´. If someone moreover has similar nature like you, I call them as ´Lofty Englishmen". That´s it! --] (]) 11:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:46, 25 August 2024
Current 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Hello, welcome to my talk page!
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Tables
Hello, it's me, Junkönig. I wanted to let you know that I agree with you that two tables at the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society article are not necessary. However, I consider the new one more orderly. And you can see the length of tenures and notable positions below. So, I am in favour of including just the new one instead of both or Just the old one. User:Junkönig — Preceding undated comment added 19:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just the one table is good. I'm happy with the new replacement table. Thanks. :)--Jeffro77 Talk 09:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Watch Tower Society publications for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Watch Tower Society publications, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Watch Tower Society publications (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
| I appreciate your diligence in checking edits made to JW articles (especially mine!). In a topic area with few contributors, your dedication shines through. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
- Thanks. I also appreciate the change of the section heading away from the vague classification of 'persecution'.--Jeffro77 Talk 22:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's something I had considered doing for awhile but the recent content about Norway has definitely convinced me that it is a good idea. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)