Misplaced Pages

Hannibal (2001 film): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:54, 30 July 2011 editMillahnna (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,965 edits Reverted to revision 441540637 by Spidey104: we don't do that here. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:47, 27 December 2024 edit undo190.108.216.129 (talk) Reference outside the parenthesisTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|2001 film by Ridley Scott}}
{{Good article}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}}
{{Infobox film {{Infobox film
| name = Hannibal | name = Hannibal
| image = Hannibal movie poster.jpg | image = Hannibal movie poster.jpg
| caption = Theatrical release poster | caption = Theatrical release poster
| director = ] | director = ]
| producer = Ridley Scott<br />] | producer = {{Plainlist|
* ]
| screenplay = ]<br />]
* ]
| based on = {{Based on|'']''|]}}
* Ridley Scott
| starring = ]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]
}}
| music = ]
| screenplay = {{Plainlist|
* ]
* ]
}}
| based_on = {{Based on|'']''|]}}
| starring = {{Plainlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}<!-- per poster -->
| music = ]
| cinematography = ] | cinematography = ]
| editing = ] | editing = ]
| studio = ] | studio = {{Plainlist|
| distributor = ]<br>] * ]
* ]
| released = {{Film date|2001|2|9}}
* ]
| runtime = 131 minutes
* ]
| country = {{Film US}}
}}
| language = English
| distributor = {{Plainlist|
| budget = $87 million
* ] (United States and Canada)<ref name=afi/>
| gross = $351,692,268
* Universal Pictures (International)<ref name=UPI>{{cite web|title=UPI floats Bullwinkle, Hannibal|first=Adam|last=Minns|date=February 23, 2000|access-date=June 9, 2024|url=https://www.screendaily.com/upi-floats-bullwinkle-hannibal/401495.article}}</ref>
| preceded by = '']''
}}
| followed by = '']''
| released = {{Film date|df=yes|2001|2|9}}
| runtime = 131 minutes<!--Theatrical runtime: 131:47--><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/hannibal-film | title=''Hannibal'' (18) | work=] | date=1 February 2001 | access-date=5 October 2016 | archive-date=5 October 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161005214517/http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/hannibal-film | url-status=live }}</ref>
| country = {{Plainlist|
* United States<ref name=afi>{{cite web|title=Hannibal|url=https://catalog.afi.com/Film/62035-HANNIBAL?sid=bf2a4b52-8a28-452e-b1d2-8b08024b10a4&sr=10.881048&cp=1&pos=0|website=AFI Catalog|access-date=12 November 2022|archive-date=12 November 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221112170324/https://catalog.afi.com/Film/62035-HANNIBAL?sid=bf2a4b52-8a28-452e-b1d2-8b08024b10a4&sr=10.881048&cp=1&pos=0|url-status=live}}</ref>
}}
| language = English
| budget = $87 million<ref name="mojo">{{cite web |url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hannibal.htm |title=Hannibal (2001) |website=] |access-date=6 March 2009 |archive-date=21 March 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090321073537/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hannibal.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>
| gross = $351.6 million<ref name="mojo" />
}} }}
'''''Hannibal''''' is a 2001 ] directed by ], adapted from the ] ]. It is a sequel to the 1991 ]-winning film '']'' that returns ] to his iconic role as serial killer ]. ] co-stars, taking over for ] in the role of FBI Agent ].


'''''Hannibal''''' is a 2001 American ] directed by ], based on the ] by ]. A sequel to the 1991 film '']'', the plot follows disgraced ] special agent ] as she attempts to apprehend the cannibalistic serial killer ] before his surviving victim, ], captures him. ] reprises his role as Lecter, while ] replaces ] as Starling and ] plays Verger. ], ], ], and ] also star.
Set ten years after ''The Silence of the Lambs'', the premise is that Lecter's only surviving victim, ] (portrayed by ]), is determined to capture, ], and kill him. The film's locations alternate between ] and the ].


Harris published ''Hannibal'' eleven years after the publication of '']'' (1988). Scott became attached while directing '']'' (2000), and signed on after reading the script pitched by ], who had produced '']'' (1986), the first Lecter film. ] and ] wrote the screenplay, and principal photography commenced in May 2000, lasting sixteen weeks.
''Hannibal'' was a highly anticipated sequel. It marked the third film appearance of Lecter.


The "bumpy" ] of ''Hannibal'' drew a large amount of attention, with '']'' ] ], ] ] and actress ] all eventually declining involvement.<ref name="tfhrev">{{cite news | first=Dan | last=Jolin | title=Hannibal film review | url=http://www.totalfilm.com/cinema_reviews/hannibal | work=Total Film | accessdate=9 March 2007}}</ref> Upon release, ''Hannibal'' broke ] records in the United States, Australia, Canada and the UK in February 2001.<ref name="indeptaste">{{cite news | title=Taste of success | url=http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article253462.ece | work=The Independent | date=20 February 2001 | accessdate=9 March 2007| location=London}}</ref> ''Hannibal'' was released on 9 February 2001 by ] in the United States and internationally by ], ten years after ''The Silence of the Lambs''. It was highly anticipated and broke box office records in the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom,<ref name="indeptaste">{{cite news|title=Taste of success |url=http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article253462.ece |work=The Independent |location=London |date=20 February 2001 |access-date=9 March 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930171355/http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article253462.ece |archive-date=30 September 2007}}</ref> and grossed $351.6 million during its theatrical run, becoming the ], but received mixed reviews; critics praised the performances and visuals, but deemed it inferior to ''The Silence of the Lambs'' and criticized its violence. It was followed by a prequel, '']'', in 2002, with Hopkins reprising his role as Lecter and ] taking over as director.
{{TOC limit|3}}


==Plot== ==Plot==
A decade after the death of serial killer ] and the escape of ] serial killer ],{{efn|As depicted in '']'' (1991).}} ] Special Agent ] is blamed for a botched drug raid that resulted in five deaths. This attracts the attention of ], Lecter's only surviving victim. A wealthy child molester, Verger was ] and disfigured by Lecter and has been scheming to torture and kill him ever since. Using his wealth and political influence, Verger has Starling reassigned to Lecter's case, hoping her involvement will draw out Lecter from hiding. He is aided by corrupt ] official Paul Krendler, who is upset that Starling refused to sleep with him.
Ten years after tracking down serial killer ], ] Special Agent ] (]) is unjustly blamed for a bungled drug raid. Starling and her connection to ] (]) come to the attention of Lecter's only surviving victim, ] (]), a wealthy ] whom Lecter left horribly disfigured and paralyzed after having been assigned as Verger's court-appointed therapist.


After learning of Starling's disgrace, Lecter sends her a letter; he is hiding in ] under the false identity of library curator "Dr. Fell." A perfume expert identifies the fragrance on the letter: skin cream with unusual ingredients available in only a few shops. Krendler sexually propositions Starling again, implying that he can save her career, but she rebuffs him.
Verger uses his immense wealth and political influence to have Starling reassigned to Lecter's case and meets with her in his mansion. Verger is pursuing an elaborate scheme to capture, torture and kill Lecter, and hopes Starling's involvement will draw him out. Indeed, Lecter sends her a taunting letter after learning of her public disgrace. Though the letter contains no clue to Lecter's whereabouts, Starling detects a strange fragrance that a perfume expert later identifies as a bespoke skin cream whose ingredients are only available to a few shops in the world. She contacts the police departments of the cities where the shops are located, requesting surveillance tapes. One of the cities is ], ], where ] Rinaldo Pazzi (]) is investigating the disappearance of a library curator. Pazzi questions Lecter, masquerading as "Dr. Fell", the assistant curator and now caretaker of the library.


Florentine policeman Rinaldo ] questions Lecter about the death of Dr. Fell's predecessor. When Starling asks Pazzi for a local fragrance shop's security footage, Pazzi realizes Dr. Fell is Lecter. To claim Verger's $3 million ] for Lecter, Pazzi agrees to help Verger's men kidnap Lecter without police involvement. However, Lecter subdues Pazzi and forces him to confess. Lecter then ] Pazzi and hangs him from the balcony of the ].{{Efn|A reference to the disemboweling of ] and the 1478 ], incidents that Lecter repeatedly mentions to Pazzi over the course of the film.}}
Upon recognizing Dr. Fell in the surveillance tape, Pazzi accesses the FBI's ] of wanted fugitives. He learns of Verger's ]3 million reward to anyone turning Lecter over to him rather than to the FBI. Lured by Verger's bounty, Pazzi ignores Starling's warnings against trying to capture Lecter alone. He recruits a ] to obtain a ] of Lecter to show as proof of his whereabouts and thus collect the reward. The pickpocket is mortally wounded by Lecter but manages to get the print and provides them to Pazzi, who in turn contacts Verger. Lecter then baits Pazzi into an isolated room of the library, ties him up with electrical cords, hangs, and ] him, before escaping back to the United States.


Verger bribes Krendler to frame Starling for hiding evidence against Lecter, leading to her suspension. Lecter summons Starling to ], where he encourages her to quit her job. However, Verger's men trail Starling and capture Lecter.
Verger bribes ] official, Paul Krendler (]), to accuse Starling of withholding a note from Lecter, leading to her suspension. Lecter lures Starling to ] but Verger's men, who have followed Starling, capture Lecter and transport him to Verger. When her superiors refuse to act, Starling, on her own initiative, infiltrates Verger's estate. Verger means to have Lecter eaten alive by a herd of ]s bred specifically for this purpose. Starling intervenes to free Lecter but is herself wounded, and Lecter rescues her from the voracious animals. Verger furiously orders his private physician Cordell (]) to shoot Lecter, but instead Lecter persuades Cordell to throw his hated employer into the pen, where he is eaten alive by the boars.


Starling infiltrates Verger's estate, where she learns that Verger intends to feed Lecter alive to a herd of purpose-bred ]. She frees Lecter from the hog pen but a guard shoots her. The hogs devour the guards but ignore Lecter. Verger orders Cordell, his physician, to shoot Lecter, but Lecter offers to take the blame if Cordell kills Verger instead. Cordell, who dislikes Verger, shoves him into the pen, where the hogs eat him alive. Lecter carries an unconscious Starling to safety.
Lecter takes a ] Starling to Krendler's secluded lake house and treats her wounds. When Krendler arrives for the ], he is subdued and drugged by Lecter. Starling, disoriented by ] and dressed in a slinky black-velvet evening gown, wakes to find Lecter cooking and Krendler in a wheelchair seated at the table set for an elegant dinner. Weakened by the drugs, she looks on in confusion and horror as Lecter removes the top of Krendler's skull, cuts out part of his ], ] it, and feeds Krendler his own brain before finally killing him.


Starling awakens in Krendler's home, wearing an unfamiliar cocktail dress. Although Lecter has sedated her and Krendler, she remembers to call the police. She then finds Lecter preparing an elegant dinner, during which Krendler lobs misogynistic insults at her. He then insults Lecter's cooking. Lecter opens Krendler's ], removes part of his ], ] it, and feeds it to Krendler. Although Lecter hopes to impress Starling by torturing her oppressor, she is horrified.
After the meal, Starling tries to attack Lecter but is quickly overpowered. She manages to handcuff his wrist to hers, and Lecter brandishes a ] and severs his left hand to escape. Lecter is later seen on a flight with a ] boxed lunch on his pull-down table. As he prepares to eat his meal, including what may or may not be Krendler's brain, a young boy seated next to him asks to try some of his food. Lecter lets the boy eat some of his lunch, telling him that "it is always important to try new things".

Starling attacks Lecter, but he overpowers and kisses her. She handcuffs their wrists together. Hearing the police arrive, Lecter raises a cleaver over her wrist. The film cuts to Starling raising both hands to meet the police.

On a flight, Lecter, his arm in a ], shares Krendler's brain with a curious boy, saying it is important to "try new things.”


==Cast== ==Cast==
{{div col}}
*] as ]
* ] as ] / Dr. Fell
*] as ]
* ] as FBI Agent ]
*] as Mason Verger
* ] as ]{{efn|Oldman was uncredited in the original theatrical version of the film. His name was added to the closing credits in all subsequent releases.}}
*] as Paul Krendler
* ] as Paul Krendler
*] as Chief Inspector Renaldo Pazzi
* ] as Barney Matthews
*] as Dr. Cordell Doemling
* ] as Chief Inspector Rinaldo Pazzi
*] as Evelda Drumgo
* ] as Allegra Pazzi
*] as Nurse Barney
*] as Carlo Deogracias * ] as Dr. Cordell Doemling
* ] as FBI Agent Clint Pearsall
*] as Allegra Pazzi
* ] as FBI Assistant Director Noonan
*] as Beatrice
* ] as Sogliato
* ] as Gnocco
* ] as Carlo Deogracias
* ] as Fabrizio
* ] as Tommaso
* ] as Evelda Drumgo
* ] as Officer Bolton
* ] as FBI Agent Burke
* ] as FBI Agent John Brigham
* James Opher as DEA Agent Eldridge
* ] as Benny Holcombe
* ] as ] in ''Vide Cor Meum''
* ] and ] as Perfume Experts
* ] as FBI Tech with Lecter's Letter
{{div col end}}


==Development== ==Development==
'']'', based on ] by ], was released in 1991 to critical and commercial success, winning five ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Collins|first=Jim|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oDwTPU8l2RQC&q=%22The+Silence+of+the+Lambs%22+%22sleeper+hit%22&pg=PA35|title=Film Theory Goes to the Movies|publisher=]|year=1992|isbn=978-0-415-90576-3|location=London, England|page=35|access-date=9 November 2020|archive-date=20 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230720052423/https://books.google.com/books?id=oDwTPU8l2RQC&q=%22The+Silence+of+the+Lambs%22+%22sleeper+hit%22&pg=PA35|url-status=live}}</ref> Harris spent several years writing a sequel novel; ''Silence of the Lambs'' director ] expressed interest in developing a film adaptation when the novel was complete.<ref name="makingdvd">''Hannibal'' DVD "Making of feature"</ref>
===Background===
'']'' director ] was asked in 1994 about a possible ] in '']''. Demme said that ], author of '']'', had been working on the follow-up for "seven or eight years." Demme had an idea even at that time that it would not be a straight follow up. Harris told Demme: "I imagine Doctor Lecter going somewhere in Europe... strolling round the streets of ] or ], gazing in the windows of watchmakers..."<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | title=Rolling Stone | date= | publisher= | url =http://storefrontdemme.com/rollingstone.html | accessdate=6 March 2007 | archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20061215220221/http://www.storefrontdemme.com/rollingstone.html |archivedate=December 15, 2006}}</ref> Demme stated his intention to be involved in the cinematic adaptation of ''Hannibal'' in 1998, less than a year before the novel was published.<ref name="makingdvd">Hannibal DVD "Making of feature"</ref>

] produced ]'s film '']'' in 1986, based on Harris' novel '']'', featuring the first appearance of ], played by ]. De Laurentiis did not like Mann's film: "''Manhunter'' was no good... it was not ''Red Dragon''," he said. De Laurentiis and his wife Martha (also his co-producer) had no direct involvement in ''The Silence of the Lambs'', a decision De Laurentiis came to regret. They did, however, own the rights to the Lecter character and reportedly allowed ], which produced ''Silence of the Lambs'', to use the character of Lecter for free, not wishing to be "greedy." When ''The Silence of the Lambs'' became a commercial and critical success in 1991, winning five ]s, both Dino and Martha De Laurentiis found themselves sitting on a valuable asset and eager for a follow-up novel they could adapt. After a lengthy wait, De Laurentiis finally received a call from Harris telling him he had finished the sequel to ''The Silence of the Lambs'' and De Laurentiis purchased the ] for a record $10 million.<ref name="made">{{cite news | first= Jill| last= Bernstein| coauthors= | title=How Hannibal came to be made | date= 9 February 2001| publisher= | url =http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,435456,00.html | work =The Guardian | pages = | accessdate = 6 March 2007| language = | location=London}}</ref>


The film rights to the Lecter character were owned by producer couple ] and ]. After producing the first Lecter film, ''],'' in 1986, they allowed ] to produce ''The Silence of the Lambs'' free without their involvement. When ''The Silence of the Lambs'' became a success, the couple became eager for a new Lecter novel they could adapt. After a lengthy wait, De Laurentiis received a call from Harris telling him he had finished the novel and De Laurentiis purchased the ] for a record $10 million.<ref name="made">{{cite news|last=Bernstein|first=Jill|date=9 February 2001|title=How Hannibal came to be made|work=The Guardian|location=London|url=http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,435456,00.html|access-date=6 March 2007|archive-date=23 December 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071223084752/http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,435456,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
In April 1999, the '']'' reported that the budget for an adaptation of ''Hannibal'' could cost as much as $100 million. It speculated that both ] and ] would receive $15 million each to reprise their roles and "$5 million to $19 million for director Jonathan Demme." The newspaper further reported that, although ''Silence of the Lambs'' cost only $22 million, this would not deter the studio from going ahead with ''Hannibal''. Mort Janklow, Harris's ] at the time, told the ''Los Angeles Times'' that Foster, Hopkins, and Demme would soon receive manuscripts of the novel, claiming it would make an unbelievable movie.<ref name="imdbnews">{{cite news | first= | last= | title=News articles | date= | publisher=IMDB | url=http://imdb.com/title/tt0212985/news | accessdate = 6 March 2007| language = }}</ref>


The book sold out of its initial 1.6 million ] in the summer of 1999.<ref name="tfscott">{{cite news | first= | last= | authorlink= | coauthors= | title=Interview with Ridley scott | url= | work= | publisher=Total Film | date=March 2001 | accessdate=6 March 2007}}</ref> ''Hannibal'' went on to sell millions of copies following its release in mid-1999.<ref name="cnnscott">{{cite news | title=Bloody 'Hannibal' lacks bite of 'Lambs' | date=8 February 2001 | publisher=CNN | url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/08/hannibal.review/index.html | accessdate=6 March 2007}}</ref> In April 1999, the '']'' reported that the budget for an adaptation of ''Hannibal'' could cost as much as $100 million. It speculated that both ] and ] would receive $15 million each to reprise their roles and that Demme would receive $5 million to $19 million. Mort Janklow, Harris's agent at the time, told the ''Los Angeles Times'' that Foster, Hopkins, and Demme would soon receive manuscripts of the novel, claiming it would make an unbelievable film.<ref name="Feast">{{cite news |date=2 April 1999 |title=Preparing to Feast on 'Hannibal' |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-apr-02-ca-23352-story.html |newspaper=] |access-date=20 October 2021 |archive-date=20 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020040050/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-apr-02-ca-23352-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The novel sold out of its initial 1.6 million ] in 1999,<ref name="tfscott">{{cite magazine | title=Interview with Ridley scott | magazine=Total Film | date=March 2001 }}</ref> and went on to sell millions of copies.<ref name="cnnscott">{{cite news|title=Bloody 'Hannibal' lacks bite of 'Lambs' |date=8 February 2001 |publisher=CNN |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/08/hannibal.review/index.html |access-date=6 March 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225002414/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/08/hannibal.review/index.html |archive-date=25 February 2007}}</ref>


Demme informed the producers of ''Hannibal'' that he would pass on ] ''Hannibal''.<ref name="makingdvd" /> It has been claimed Demme turned down the project because he found the material "lurid"<ref name="morris">{{cite news | first= Mark| last= Morris| coauthors= | title=Pleased to eat you | date=4 February 2001 | publisher=The Guardian | url=http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,433350,00.html | work = | pages = | accessdate = 7 March 2007| language = | location=London}}</ref> and was averse to the book's "gore".<ref>{{cite news | first=Gillian | last=Flynn | title=Rebirth of Cruel | date=11 October 2002| publisher= | url =http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,357302,00.html | work =Entertainment Weekly | pages = | accessdate = 12 June 2007| language = }}</ref> De Laurentiis said on Demme's decision to decline: "When the pope dies, we create a new pope. Good luck to Jonathan Demme. Good-bye."<ref name="made" /> He has since added that Demme felt he could not make a sequel as good as ''The Silence of the Lambs''.<ref name="MovieMogulsde">{{cite book | last=Prigge | first=Steven | year=2004 | title= Movie Moguls Speak: Interview with top film producers | isbn=978-0-7864-1929-6 | publisher=McFarland}}</ref> Demme declined the invitation to direct,<ref name="makingdvd" /> as he reportedly found the material lurid<ref name="morris">{{cite news | first=Mark | last=Morris | title=Pleased to eat you | date=4 February 2001 | work=The Guardian | location=London | url=http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,433350,00.html | access-date=7 March 2007 | archive-date=23 December 2007 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071223084747/http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,433350,00.html | url-status=live }}</ref> and too gory.<ref>{{cite magazine | first=Gillian | last=Flynn | title=Rebirth of Cruel | date=11 October 2002 | url=https://ew.com/article/2002/10/04/red-dragons-cast-spills-behind-scenes-dish/ | magazine=] | access-date=12 June 2007 | archive-date=19 August 2007 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070819035937/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,357302,00.html | url-status=live }}</ref> In the 2010 ] documentary ''Inside Story: The Silence of the Lambs'', Demme said: "Tom Harris, as unpredictable as ever, took Clarice and Dr. Lecter's relationship in a direction that just didn't compute for me. And Clarice is drugged up, and she's eating brains with him, and I just thought, 'I can't do this.'"<ref>{{YouTube|id=GomRnogIdHE|title=Inside Story The Silence of the Lambs (русские субтитры)}}</ref> De Laurentiis said of Demme's decision to decline: "When the pope dies, we create a new pope. Good luck to Jonathan Demme. Good-bye."<ref name="made" /> He later said that Demme felt he could not make a sequel as good as ''The Silence of the Lambs''.<ref name="MovieMogulsde">{{cite book | last=Prigge | first=Steven | year=2004 | title= Movie Moguls Speak: Interview with top film producers | isbn=978-0-7864-1929-6 | publisher=McFarland}}</ref>


===Ridley Scott=== ===Ridley Scott===
De Laurentiis visited ] on the set of '']'' and suggested he direct ''Hannibal''.<ref name="MovieMogulsde" /> Scott, who was conducting ] on ''Gladiator,'' thought De Laurentiis was speaking about ] and replied: "Dino, I'm doing a Roman epic right now. I don't wanna do elephants coming over the Alps next, old boy."<ref name="makingdvd" />
De Laurentiis visited ] on the set of '']'' and suggested to Ridley he read the novel he had bought the rights to.<ref name="MovieMogulsde" /> Scott was in the third week before ] was due to finish on ''Gladiator''.<ref name="makingdvd" /> ''Gladiator'' became a commercial and critical success, earning 12 ] nominations.<ref name="cnnscott" /> De Laurentiis asked Scott if he would like to direct the film version of ''Hannibal''. Scott misunderstood which Hannibal he meant, thinking De Laurentiis was speaking of the ] who nearly brought down the ] back around 200 B.C., so he replied: "Basically, Dino, I’m doing a Roman epic right now. I don’t wanna do ]s coming over the ] next, old boy."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott read the ] in four sittings within a week, believing it to be a "]", and expressed his desire to do it.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott further explains how he got involved: "I was shooting ''Gladiator'' in ] and one day, for the hell of it, I went for a walk for half a mile down the road to the Malta Film Studio to see my old buddy Dino. I had not seen him since I’d worked on a version of ]. This was pre-'']''. Dino had pursued me to direct ''Dune'' and another film. He's always enthusiastic and aggressive and came after me when I did both ''Blade Runner'' and '']'', but I couldn’t do the films. Anyway, we had an espresso together and a few days later, he called me to ask if he could visit the ''Gladiator'' set. He arrived with a manuscript of ''Hannibal'', about a month before it was published in book form. He said: ‘Lets make this one.’ I haven’t read anything so fast since '']''. It was so rich in all kind of ways."<ref name="tfscott" />


Although Scott had accepted the job Demme had rejected, he said: "My first question was: ‘What about Jonathan?’ and they said: ‘The original team said it's too violent.’ I said, 'Okay. I’ll do it.'" Scott did, himself, have some uncertainty with the source material. He had difficulties with the ending of the novel in particular: "I couldn’t take that quantum leap emotionally on behalf of Starling. Certainly, on behalf of Hannibal &mdash; I’m sure that's been in the back of his mind for a number of years. But for Starling, no. I think one of the attractions about Starling to Hannibal is what a straight arrow she is." (In the novel Lecter and Starling end up an actual couple on the run together). He also "didn’t buy the book from the ] scene onwards, which became like a ] movie." He asked Harris if he was "married to his ending". Harris said he was not, so he changed it.<ref name="tfscott" /> Scott read the manuscript in four sittings within a week, seeing it as a "symphony", and expressed his desire to direct.<ref name="makingdvd" /> He said: "I haven't read anything so fast since '']''. It was so rich in all kinds of ways."<ref name="tfscott" /> Scott had reservations with the ending of the novel, in which Lecter and Starling become lovers: "I couldn't take that quantum leap emotionally on behalf of Starling. Certainly, on behalf of Hannibal—I'm sure that's been in the back of his mind for a number of years. But for Starling, no. I think one of the attractions about Starling to Hannibal is what a straight arrow she is."<ref name="tfscott" /> He also did not find the book believable after the opera scene, "which became like a vampire movie". Harris gave Scott permission to change the ending.<ref name="tfscott" />


===Writing===
{{cquote|I always imagined Hannibal likes ], ], ]....to explore his mind palace....needless to say I don’t do either, they are too much for me. I'd rather just have a cigar.|30px|30px|Ridley Scott on his thoughts on Hannibal Lecter as a character.<ref name="ridcom" />}}
], screenwriter for ''The Silence of the Lambs'', was another key member of the ''Silence of the Lambs'' team to decline involvement. Tally, like Demme, had problems with the novel's "excesses".<ref name="morris" /> ] was the first screenwriter to produce a draft, which, according to Scott and the producers, needed major revisions.<ref name="made" /> ], co-chairman of ], said: "There's no way David was going to read 15 pages of our notes and then be available to work on the script day-to-day."<ref>{{cite web |date=20 October 1999 |title=Britain's stars rise in Europe |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/1999/oct/20/2 |website=] |quote=Mamet's Hannibal script not to Universal's taste |access-date=20 October 2021 |archive-date=20 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020041735/https://www.theguardian.com/film/1999/oct/20/2 |url-status=live }}</ref> A script review at ScreenwritersUtopia.com describes the Mamet draft as "stunningly bad" but found Zaillian's rewrite "gripping entertainment".<ref name="staxrev">{{cite news |author=Stax |title=Script Review: Hannibal |url=http://screenwritersutopia.com/modules.php?name=Content&file=print&pid=116 |work=ScreenwriterUtopia |access-date=9 March 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061018234328/http://www.screenwritersutopia.com/modules.php?name=Content&file=print&pid=116 |archive-date=18 October 2006}}</ref> Scott praised Mamet as fast and efficient, but said he passed on his draft because it needed work and he feared Mamet, who was soon directing his own film,<ref name="made" /> would be too busy to redraft it.<ref name="tfscott" />


], writer of '']'', initially declined to write ''Hannibal'', saying he was busy and that "you can almost never win when you do a sequel".<ref name="made" /> He changed his mind, as "it's hard to say no to Dino once and it's almost impossible to say no to him twice".<ref name="made" /> Scott said there were "very few rewrites once I brought in Steve Zaillian ... If you were to ask who were the best three screenwriters in the business, Steve Zaillian would be one of them. We discussed ''Hannibal'' endlessly."<ref name="tfscott" /> One of Zaillian's key objectives was to revise Mamet's script until it pleased all parties, meaning that the "love story" would be told by suggestion instead of by "assault".<ref name="rollingrevhan">{{cite magazine | first=Peter | last=Travers | author-link=Peter Travers | title=Hannibal—Rolling Stone Review | url =https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948327/review/5948328/hannibal | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20070614023206/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948327/review/5948328/hannibal | url-status =dead | archive-date =14 June 2007 | magazine=] | access-date =9 March 2007}}</ref> Scott worked through the script with Zaillian for 28 days, making him "sweat through it with him and discuss every inch of the way with him". After 25 days, Scott realized that Zaillian was "exorcising the 600 pages of the book. He was distilling through discussion what he was gonna finally do ... Frankly I could have just made it."<ref name="makingdvd" />
===Script development===
], the ] for '']'', was another key member of the original team to decline involvement in ''Hannibal'' (he won an ] for his ''Silence'' adaptation). Tally, like Demme, had problems with the novel's "excesses".<ref name="morris" />

] (writer of '']'') was offered the chance to write the adaptation after Tally passed, but he also declined. He explained that "I was busy. And I wasn’t sure I was interested. You can almost never win when you do a ]."<ref name="made" /> ] was the first ] to produce a draft, which, according to ] and the producers, needed major revisions.<ref name="made" /> Stacey Snider, co-chairman of ] (a co-production deal was struck between Universal and ]) said on the rejection of Mamet's screenplay: "There's no way David was going to read 15 pages of our notes and then be available to work on the script day-to-day."<ref name="imdbnews" /> Mamet was preparing to direct his own film.<ref name="made" /> A script review at ScreenwritersUtopia.com describes the Mamet draft as "stunningly bad" but found Zaillian's rewrite to be "gripping entertainment".<ref name="zimmerrev">{{cite news | first="Stax"| last= | coauthors= | title=Script Review: Hannibal | date= | publisher= | url =http://screenwritersutopia.com/modules.php?name=Content&file=print&pid=116 | work =ScreenwriterUtopia | pages = | accessdate = 9 March 2007| language = }}</ref> Zaillian, who had already passed, reconsidered and became involved in the project, saying: "It's hard to say no to Dino once and it's almost impossible to say no to him twice."<ref name="made" />

This question (regarding the script development) was put to Ridley Scott by '']'' magazine: "There were lots of rewrites on 'Hannibal' &mdash; what was the main problem with the original material?" Scott replied: "That's inaccurate, because there were very few rewrites once I brought in Steve Zaillian. If you were to ask who were the best three screenwriters in the business, Steve Zaillian would be one of them. We discussed ''Hannibal'' endlessly."<ref name="tfscott" /> Asked if he had read Mamet's draft, he said: "Yes. He is very fast, very efficient, but he was off doing a film. 'Hannibal' was green lit and his first draft only took about a month. But I was scared that he would not be able to give me enough attention, because that draft needed a lot of work. So I moved on basically."<ref name="tfscott" /> Scott has said there were writing and "structural problems" as to what they would do with parts of the movie.<ref name="ridcom" /> One of Zaillian's key objectives was to revise the script by David Mamet until it pleased all parties, meaning the "love" story would need to be done by suggestion instead of by "assault".<ref name="rollingrevhan">{{cite news | first=Peter | last=Travers | coauthors= | title=Hannibal—Rolling Stone Review | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948327/review/5948328/hannibal | work =Rolling Stone | pages = | accessdate = 9 March 2007| language = }}</ref> Scott worked through the script with Zaillian for 28 days making him "sweat through it with him and discuss every inch of the way with him." After 25 days Scott suddenly realized that Zaillian was "exorcising the 600 pages of the book. He was distilling through discussion what he was gonna finally do...Frankly I could have just made it."<ref name="makingdvd" />


===Casting=== ===Casting===
It was unclear if ] (]) and ] (]) would ] their respective roles for which they won ] in '']'' (best actress/actor).<ref name="imdbnews" /> It became apparent that the producers and the ] could do without one of the original "stars" (and ''would'' go on to find a replacement). The withdrawal of both Foster and Hopkins could possibly have been terminal for the project, however. De Laurentiis confirmed this after the film's release: "First and foremost, I knew we had no movie without Anthony Hopkins."<ref name="MovieMogulsde" /> It was unclear if Jodie Foster (]) and Anthony Hopkins (]) would reprise their respective roles for which they won Academy Awards in ''The Silence of the Lambs'' (]/]). Both Hopkins and Foster had expressed interest.<ref name="Feast" /> It became apparent that the producers and the studio could do without one of the original "stars" and would go on to find a replacement. The withdrawal of both Foster and Hopkins could possibly have been terminal for the project, however. De Laurentiis confirmed this after the film's release: "First and foremost, I knew we had no movie without Anthony Hopkins."<ref name="MovieMogulsde" />


====Involvement of Jodie Foster==== ====Involvement of Jodie Foster====
Regarding her involvement in a sequel to ''Silence of the Lambs'', ] confirmed to ] in 1997 that she "would definitely be part of it".<ref name="tfscott" /> She told '']'' in 1997 that "Anthony Hopkins always talks about it. I mean, everybody wants to do it. Every time I see him, it's like: 'When is it going to happen? When is it going to happen?'"<ref name="ki">{{cite news | title=Killer Instinct | url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,275700,00.html | work=Entertainment Weekly | date=17 March 2000 | accessdate=June 12 2007}}</ref> De Laurentiis thought Foster would decline once she read the book, even believing the final movie was better for it.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Hopkins also had doubts Foster would be involved, saying he had a "hunch" she would not be.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Foster did turn it down, confirming this in late December 1999.<ref name="doubtlamb">{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Lambs 'in doubt' without Foster | date= 6 January 2000| publisher= | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/592904.stm | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 7 March 2007| language = }}</ref> Foster told ] in 1997 that she "would definitely be part of" a sequel to ''The Silence of the Lambs''.<ref name="tfscott" /> In the same year, she told '']:'' "Anthony Hopkins always talks about it. I mean, everybody wants to do it. Every time I see him, it's like: 'When is it going to happen? When is it going to happen?'"<ref name="ki">{{cite magazine | title=Killer Instinct | url=https://ew.com/article/2000/03/17/julianne-moore-gears-hannibal/ | magazine=] | date=17 March 2000 | access-date=12 June 2007 | first=Daniel | last=Fierman | archive-date=1 April 2007 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070401045426/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,275700,00.html | url-status=live }}</ref> De Laurentiis thought Foster would decline once she read the book, and believed the final film was better for it.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Hopkins also had doubts Foster would be involved, saying he had a "hunch" she would not be.<ref name="makingdvd" />

This would cause problems for the studio, ] and partner ].<ref name="ki" /><ref name="made" /> "The studio is just back from the holiday and is regrouping based on the news, and has no cohesive game plan at the moment," said Kevin Misher, Universal's President of Production.<ref name="made" /> Misher added that, "It was one of those moments when you sit down and think, ‘Can Clarice be looked upon as ] for instance? A character who is replaceable?' Or was Jodie Foster Clarice Starling, and the audience will not accept anyone else?"<ref name="made" /> Foster said in December 1999 that the characterization of Starling in ''Hannibal'' had "negative attributes" and "betrayed" the original character.<ref name="doubtlamb" />
Foster confirmed that she had turned down the film in December 1999.<ref name="doubtlamb">{{cite news | title=Lambs 'in doubt' without Foster | date=6 January 2000 | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/592904.stm | work=BBC | access-date=7 March 2007 | archive-date=13 August 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090813044442/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/592904.stm | url-status=live }}</ref> This caused problems for ] and production partner ] (MGM).<ref name="made" /><ref name="ki" /> "The studio is just back from the holiday and is regrouping based on the news, and has no cohesive game plan at the moment," said Kevin Misher, Universal's President of Production.<ref name="made" /> Misher added that, "It was one of those moments when you sit down and think, 'Can Clarice be looked upon as ] for instance? A character who is replaceable?' Or was Jodie Foster Clarice Starling, and the audience will not accept anyone else?"<ref name="made" /> Foster said in December 1999 that the characterization of Starling in ''Hannibal'' had "negative attributes" and "betrayed" the original character.<ref name="doubtlamb" />
Foster's spokeswoman said the actress declined because ] had become available for Foster's own project, '']''.<ref>{{cite news| title=Foster passes on Lambs sequel | date= 29 December 1999| publisher= | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/581813.stm | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 7 March 2007| language = }}</ref> ] demands may also have played a part in Foster's non-participation. De Laurentiis said, "I call the agent of Judy Foster. He say to me ‘I have instruction. She no want to read the script if you no give her an offer of $20m and 15% of the gross.’ And I say, ‘Give my love to Judy Foster, goodbye.’"<ref name="made" /> (The article makes clear that "Dino comically mispronounces the actress's name")<ref name="made" /> ''Entertainment Weekly'' described the project as becoming "a bloody mess, hemorrhaging talent and money" even despite Hopkins being on-board.<ref name="ki" />

Foster talked about ''Hannibal'' in an interview with '']'' magazine in late 2005. She said: "The official reason I didn’t do ''Hannibal'' is I was doing another movie, ''Flora Plum''. So I get to say, in a nice dignified way, that I wasn’t available when that movie was being shot...Clarice meant so much to Jonathan and I, she really did, and I know it sounds kind of strange to say but there was no way that either of us could really trample on her."<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=The Total Film Interview: Jodie Foster | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.totalfilm.com/features/the_total_film_interview__jodie_foster | work =Total Film | pages = | accessdate = 7 March 2007| language = }}</ref>
Foster's spokeswoman said she declined because ] had become available for Foster's film '']''.<ref>{{cite news | title=Foster passes on Lambs sequel | date=29 December 1999 | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/581813.stm | work=BBC | access-date=7 March 2007 | archive-date=27 February 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227224512/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/581813.stm | url-status=live }}</ref> ''Entertainment Weekly'' described the ''Hannibal'' project as having become "a bloody mess, hemorrhaging talent and money" despite Hopkins being on board.<ref name="ki" /> In 2005, after the film had been released, Foster told '']'': "The official reason I didn't do ''Hannibal'' is I was doing another movie, ''Flora Plum''. So I get to say, in a nice dignified way, that I wasn't available when that movie was being shot ... Clarice meant so much to Jonathan and I, she really did, and I know it sounds kind of strange to say but there was no way that either of us could really trample on her."<ref>{{cite news | title=The Total Film Interview: Jodie Foster | url=https://www.gamesradar.com/the-total-film-interview-jodie-foster/ | work=Total Film | access-date=7 March 2021 | archive-date=6 April 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210406001936/https://www.gamesradar.com/the-total-film-interview-jodie-foster/ | url-status=live }}</ref>


====Julianne Moore as Clarice Starling==== ====Julianne Moore as Clarice Starling====
When it became clear that Foster would skip ''Hannibal'', the ] considered several different actresses,<ref name="makingdvd" /> including ], ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="made" /> Hopkins asked his agent if he had any "power" over casting. He informed De Laurentiis that he knew Julianne Moore, with whom he had worked on '']'', and thought her a "terrific actress".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Although Hopkins' agent told him he had no contractual influence on casting, Scott thought it correct to discuss who would be Hopkins' "leading lady".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott said he was "really surprised to find that I had five of the top actresses in ] wanting it."<ref name="tfscott" /> Moore would eventually secure the part. Scott said his decision was swayed in favor of Moore because: "She is a true chameleon. She can be a lunatic in '']'', a vamp in '']'', a ] in '']'' and a romantic in '']'' "<ref name="tfscott" /> "Julianne Moore, once Jodie decided to pass was always top of my list." said Scott on his female lead.<ref name="ridcom">Hannibal DVD "Ridley Scott commentary"</ref> Moore talked about stepping into a role made famous by another actress: "The new Clarice would be very different. Of course people are going to compare my interpretation with that of Jodie Foster's...but this film is going to be very different."<ref name="hannibalpe" /> When it became clear that Foster would skip ''Hannibal'', the ] considered several different actresses,<ref name="makingdvd" /> including ], ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="made" /> Hopkins asked his agent if he had any "power" over casting. He informed De Laurentiis that he knew Moore, with whom he had worked on '']'', and thought her a "terrific actress".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Although Hopkins' agent told him he had no contractual influence on casting, Scott thought it correct to discuss who would be Hopkins' "leading lady".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott said he was "really surprised to find that had five of the top actresses in Hollywood wanting it."<ref name="tfscott" /> In order to star in ''Hannibal'', Moore would decline to play a role in '']''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://screenrant.com/unbreakable-split-glass-movies-trivia-behind-scenes/|title=Glass: 20 Wild Details Behind The Making Of The Unbreakable Movies|website=] |date=15 January 2019 }}</ref>
Scott said his decision was swayed in favor of Moore: "She is a true chameleon. She can be a lunatic in '']'', a vamp in '']'', a porn star in '']'' and a romantic in '']''."<ref name="tfscott" /> "Julianne Moore, once Jodie decided to pass, was always top of my list," said Scott on his female lead.<ref name="ridcom">Hannibal DVD "Ridley Scott commentary"</ref> Moore talked about stepping into a role made famous by another actress: "The new Clarice would be very different. Of course people are going to compare my interpretation with that of Jodie Foster's ... but this film is going to be very different."<ref name="hannibalpe" />


====Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter==== ====Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter====
]]]
Hopkins was generally expected to reprise his ]-winning role. Hopkins did say in June 1999 that he would only be interested if the script was "really good".<ref name="imdbnews" /> Hopkins says on the making-of feature on ] that he couldn’t make up his mind to commit. "I was kind of surprised by this book, ''Hannibal''. I thought it was really overreaching and so bizarre. So I couldn’t make up my mind about it all. Some of it I found intriguing, some I was a little doubtful about."<ref name="makingdvd" /> When the producers confirmed that they were going to film Harris' novel, Hopkins told them yes, but added: "It needs some condensing."<ref name="makingdvd" /> The '']'' would confirm that Hopkins had agreed to reprise his role in late December 1999, saying he had approved the latest ] of the ] by ].<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Sir Anthony set for Lambs sequel | date= 21 December 1999| publisher= | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/573715.stm | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 7 March 2007| language = }}</ref> Hopkins said he had no difficulty moving back into "Lecter's mind". "I just learned the lines and showed up and walked around as Hannibal Lecter. I thought, 'Do I repeat that same performance, or do I vary it?' Ten years had passed so I changed a bit."<ref name="made" /> In the book, Lecter uses bandages to disguise himself as a ] patient. This was left out of the film because Scott and Hopkins agreed to leave the face alone.<ref name="plshan">{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Movie Interview: Anthony Hopkins | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/anthony_hopkins_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 9 March 2007| language = }}</ref> Hopkins explains why: "It's as if he's making a statement – 'catch me if you can'. With his big hat, he's so obvious that nobody thinks he's Hannibal Lecter. I've always thought he's a very elegant man, a ] man."<ref name="plshan" /> In the film, Lecter is first seen in ] "as the classical Lecter, lecturing and being smooth", according to Hopkins.<ref name="actor">{{cite news | first=Charlie | last=Rose | coauthors= | title=60 Minutes: Actors' Take On Ridley Scott | date=30 January 2001| publisher= | url =http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/01/28/60II/main267669.shtml?source=search_story | work =CBS News | pages = | accessdate = 8 June 2007| language = }}</ref> When the film moves to the US, Hopkins changed his appearance by building up muscle and cropping his hair short "to make him like a ], that he would be so fit and so strong that he could just snap somebody in two if they got... in his way".<ref name="actor" />
Hopkins was generally expected to reprise his Academy Award-winning role. Hopkins said in June 1999 that he would only be interested if the script was "really good".{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}<ref name="imdbnews">{{cite news | title=News articles | publisher=IMDB | url=http://imdb.com/title/tt0212985/news | access-date=6 March 2007 | archive-date=17 March 2004 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040317150827/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/news | url-status=live }}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=IMDB not a reliable source and reference points to a dynamic list page with many news articles|date=October 2021}} Hopkins said he could not make up his mind to commit: "I was kind of surprised by this book, ''Hannibal''. I thought it was really overreaching and so bizarre. So I couldn't make up my mind about it all. Some of it I found intriguing, some I was a little doubtful about."<ref name="makingdvd" /> When the producers confirmed that they were going to film Harris' novel, Hopkins told them yes, but added: "It needs some condensing."<ref name="makingdvd" /> '']'' confirmed that Hopkins had agreed to reprise his role in late December 1999, saying he had approved the latest draft of the script.<ref>{{cite news | title=Sir Anthony set for Lambs sequel | date=21 December 1999 | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/573715.stm | work=BBC | access-date=7 March 2007 | archive-date=22 February 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222134505/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/573715.stm | url-status=live }}</ref>
{{cquote|He's still the sort of ] of killers. He kills the—what do they call them? The terminally rude.|30px|30px| Anthony Hopkins on Hannibal Lecter.<ref name="actor" />}}


Hopkins said he had no difficulty moving back into "Lecter's mind". "I just learned the lines and showed up and walked around as Hannibal Lecter. I thought, 'Do I repeat that same performance, or do I vary it?' Ten years had passed so I changed a bit."<ref name="made" /> In the book, Lecter uses bandages to disguise himself as a ] patient. This was left out of the film because Scott and Hopkins agreed to leave the face alone.<ref name="plshan">{{cite news | title=Movie Interview: Anthony Hopkins | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/anthony_hopkins_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | work=BBC | access-date=9 March 2007 | archive-date=26 March 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326030928/https://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/anthony_hopkins_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | url-status=live }}</ref> Hopkins said: "It's as if he's making a statement—'catch me if you can'. With his big hat, he's so obvious that nobody thinks he's Hannibal Lecter. I've always thought he's a very elegant man, a ]."<ref name="plshan" /> In the film, Lecter is first seen in Florence "as the classical Lecter, lecturing and being smooth", according to Hopkins.<ref name="actor">{{cite news | first=Charlie | last=Rose | title=60 Minutes: Actors' Take On Ridley Scott | date=30 January 2001 | url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/actors-take-on-ridley-scott/ | work=CBS News | access-date=8 June 2007 | archive-date=28 April 2005 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050428163357/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/01/28/60II/main267669.shtml | url-status=live }}</ref> When the film moves to the US, Hopkins changed his appearance by building up muscle and cropping his hair short "to make him like a ], that he would be so fit and so strong that he could just snap somebody in two if they got ... in his way".<ref name="actor" />
====Further casting====
Other stars subsequently cast included ] as corrupt ] official Paul Krendler (a character that appeared in ''Silence of the Lambs'', though original actor ] died before the production of ''Hannibal'') and ] screen legend ] as the opportunistic Detective Rinaldo Pazzi. ] won the role of Pazzi's wife, Allegra. ] signed on to reprise his role as hospital orderly Barney Matthews. (The actor had appeared in ''Silence of the Lambs'' in the same role. He also appeared in the film '']'' as another character, Lt. Fisk).


====Gary Oldman as Mason Verger====
] was cast as Mason Verger, one of Lecter's two surviving victims. Co-producer Martha De Laurentiis said they had a "funny situation" with Oldman wanting a prominent "credit".<ref name="made" /> She said: "Now how can you have a prominent credit with ''Hannibal''? The characters are Hannibal and Clarice Starling. So we really couldn’t work something out (at first)."<ref name="made" /> Oldman was apparently "out" of the movie for while, but then came back in, asking to go "unbilled".<ref name="made" /> Oldman would become transformed and "unrecognizable as himself" to play the part of Verger. He would have no lips, cheeks or eyelids. Make-up artist Greg Cannom said: "It's really disgusting... I’ve been showing people pictures , and they all just say ‘Oh my God,’ and walk away, which makes me very happy."<ref name="made" /> Oldman said that having his name completely removed from the billing and credits allowed him to "do it anonymously" under that heavy make-up.<ref></ref>
The part of Mason Verger, one of Lecter's two surviving victims, was originally offered to ] based on his work as a police officer who uses a wheelchair in '']'' (1995). Not having read the novel, Reeve showed initial interest in the role, but ultimately declined upon realizing that Verger was a quadriplegic, facially-disfigured child rapist.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Llenden |first=Joseph |date=June 2003 |title=You Offered Me ''What''?! Roles Rejected By Great Actors |journal=] |publisher=] }}</ref><ref>Johnson, Malcolm. . '']''. 12 October 2004. Retrieved 22 July 2012.</ref> The part was later accepted by secondary choice ]. Co-producer Martha De Laurentiis claimed they had a "funny situation" with Oldman wanting a prominent "credit". She said: "Now how can you have a prominent credit with ''Hannibal''? The characters are Hannibal and Clarice Starling. So we really couldn't work something out (at first)." Oldman was apparently "out" of the film for a while, but then came back in, asking to go "unbilled". Oldman would become transformed and "unrecognizable as himself" to play the part of Verger. He would have no lips, cheeks or eyelids. Make-up artist ] said: "It's really disgusting ... I've been showing people pictures , and they all just say 'Oh my God,' and walk away, which makes me very happy."<ref name="made"/> Oldman said that having his name completely removed from the billing and credits allowed him to "do it anonymously" under the heavy make-up.<ref name="Keier">{{cite web |date=26 Feb 2001 |author=Helen Keier |title=Interview with Gary Oldman |website=] |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman |access-date=20 October 2021 |archive-date=20 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020032503/https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman |url-status=live }}</ref>

====Further casting====
Other stars subsequently cast included ] as ] official Paul Krendler (the character had appeared in ''The Silence of the Lambs'', but original actor ] had died in the interim) and Italian actor ] as Detective Rinaldo Pazzi. ] played Pazzi's wife, Allegra. ] reprised his role as orderly Barney Matthews, remaining the only actor to play a role in all ''Lecter'' feature films (until '']'' in 2007), including '']''.


===Key production crew=== ===Key production crew===
Scott recruited key production crew whom he had worked with previously. Production designer Norris Spencer had worked on '']'', '']'' and '']''. Cinematographer ], editor ] and composer ] had all worked on Scott's previous film, '']''.<ref name="prodnotes">Official Hannibal production notes</ref> Scott recruited the key production crew whom he had worked with previously. Production designer Norris Spencer had worked on '']'', '']'' and '']''. Cinematographer ], editor ] and composer ] had all worked on Scott's previous film '']''.<ref name="prodnotes">Official Hannibal production notes{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}</ref>


==Production and post production== ==Production==
===Background=== ===Background===
''Hannibal'' was filmed in 83 working days over 16 weeks.<ref name="hanj">Official Hannibal Journal</ref> The film began ] on May 8, 2000 in ].<ref name="hanj" /> The film visited key locations in Florence and various locations around the United States.<ref name="prodnotes" /> Martha De Laurentiis said the movie has almost a hundred locations and that is was a "constant pain of moving and dressing sets. But the locations were beautiful. Who could complain about being allowed to shoot in Palazzo Vecchio in Florence? Or President ]'s farm in ] or the amazing Biltmore Estate in ]?"<ref name="prodnotes" /> Eighty million dollars and a year and a half in production were spent before Scott got his first look at ''Hannibal'' in the editing room.<ref>{{cite news | first=Charlie | last=Rose | coauthors= | title=60 Minutes: Ridley Scott | year=2001 | publisher= | url =http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/01/27/60II/main267597.shtml | work =CBS | pages = | accessdate = 7 June 2007| language = | date=27 January 2001}}</ref> ''Hannibal'' was filmed in 83 working days over 16 weeks.<ref name="hanj">Official Hannibal Journal</ref> The film began ] on 8 May 2000 in ], ].<ref name="hanj" /> The film visited key locations in Florence and various locations around the United States.<ref name="prodnotes" /> Martha De Laurentiis said the film has almost a hundred locations and that it was a "constant pain of moving and dressing sets. But the locations were beautiful. Who could complain about being allowed to shoot in ] in Florence? Or President ]'s farm in ] or the amazing ] in ]?"<ref name="prodnotes" /> Eighty million dollars and a year and a half in production were spent before Scott got his first look at ''Hannibal'' in the editing room.<ref>{{cite news | first=Charlie | last=Rose | title=60 Minutes: Ridley Scott | url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ridley-scott/ | work=CBS News | access-date=7 June 2007 | date=27 January 2001 | archive-date=13 October 2007 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013153949/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/01/27/60II/main267597.shtml | url-status=live }}</ref>


===Filming locations=== ===Filming locations===
*The whole second act of ''Hannibal'' takes place in ]. Ridley Scott had never filmed there before, but described it as "quite an experience...It was kind of organized chaos...We were there at the height of tourist season."<ref name="prodnotes" /> Within Florence the production would visit various ] such as the Palazzo Capponi (as Dr. Fell's workplace), the ], the ], the Pharmacy of Santa Maria Novella and the ].<ref name="prodnotes" /> * The whole second act of ''Hannibal'' takes place in ]. Ridley Scott had never filmed there before, but described it as "quite an experience ... It was kind of organized chaos ... We were there at the height of tourist season."<ref name="prodnotes" /> Within Florence, the production would visit various ] such as the Palazzo Capponi (as Dr. Fell's workplace), the ], the ], the Pharmacy of Santa Maria Novella and the ].<ref name="prodnotes" />
*After leaving Italy on June 5, 2000, the production moved to ] Filming took place over six days at ].<ref name="prodnotes" /> The unusual sight of a ] would appear in the transportation hub and shopping plaza at the request of director ].<ref name="prodnotes" /> * After leaving Italy on 5 June 2000, the production moved to Washington, D.C. Filming took place over six days at ].<ref name="prodnotes" /> The unusual sight of a ] appeared in the transportation hub and shopping plaza at Ridley Scott's request.<ref name="prodnotes" />
*Filming would last for seven weeks in ]<ref name="prodnotes" /> for the shootout in a crowded fish market (shot at Richmond Farmer's Market) early in the film. ] underwent ] training at the Bureau's headquarters before filming.<ref name="prodnotes" /> * Filming lasted for seven weeks in ]<ref name="prodnotes" /> for the shootout in a crowded fish market (shot at Richmond Farmer's Market) early in the film. ] underwent ] training at the Bureau's headquarters before filming.<ref name="prodnotes" />
*A barn in ], situated on the estate of President ], was used to house 15 "performing hogs".<ref name="prodnotes" /> The fifteen Russian boars used in the shoot, were from a selection of around 6,000 of which the animal wranglers looked at.<ref name="prodnotes" /> * A barn in ], situated on the estate of President ], was used to house 15 "performing hogs".<ref name="prodnotes" /> The 15 Russian boars used in the shoot were from a selection of around 6,000 that the animal wranglers observed.<ref name="prodnotes" />
*] in ], the biggest privately owned estate in the U.S., was chosen to signify the huge personal wealth of ].<ref name="makingdvd"/> * ] in ], the biggest privately owned estate in the US, was chosen to signify the huge personal wealth of ].<ref name="makingdvd" />


===Special make-up effects=== ===Special make-up effects===
] Greg Cannom was pleased to be involved in ''Hannibal'' as it offered him the chance to produce "incredible and original make-ups".<ref name="makingdvd" /> For Mason Verger the make-up team would initially produce 20 different "heads" which looked like "]s" and did not reflect the vision Scott had of the character; Scott wanted Verger to look real with hideous scarring, and not something from the "House of Wax".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott himself would actually call up the help of expert doctors in an effort to get the look of the character as realistic as possible.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott showed the make-up team pictures of "foetal things", which he thought "touching"; he wanted to make Mason Verger more "touching" than "monstrous", as he thought of Verger as being "someone who hadn’t lost his sense of humour...almost sympathetic."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Oldman would spend six hours a day in make-up to prepare for the role.<ref name="makingdvd" /> ] Greg Cannom was pleased to be involved in ''Hannibal'' as it offered him the chance to produce "incredible and original make-ups".<ref name="makingdvd" /> For Mason Verger, the make-up team initially produced 20 different heads which looked like zombies and did not reflect the vision Scott had of the character. Scott wanted Verger to look real with hideous scarring, and not something from the "House of Wax".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott himself called on the help of expert doctors in an effort to get the look of the character as realistic as possible.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott showed the make-up team pictures of foetal things, which he thought touching; he wanted to make Mason Verger more touching than monstrous, as he thought of Verger as being someone who hadn't lost his sense of humour, almost sympathetic.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Oldman spent six hours a day in make-up to prepare for the role.<ref name="makingdvd" />


For one of the final and infamous scenes of the movie an exact "duplicate" was created of the character Paul Krendler, played by ], a scene which blended make-up, ] work and ] in a way which Scott called "seamless".<ref name="makingdvd" /> For one of the film's final and infamous scenes, an exact duplicate was created of the character Paul Krendler, played by ], a scene which blended make-up, ] work and ] in a way which Scott called "seamless".<ref name="makingdvd" />


===Title sequence=== ===Title sequence===
The main titles were designed by Nick Livesey, a graduate of the ] who worked for one of Scott's production companies in ]. The ], shot in ] by Livesey himself was intended as the second promotional trailer for the film.<ref name="makingdvd" /> The studio thought it not "quite right", but it remained on Scott's mind and would eventually end up as the main ].<ref name="makingdvd" /> Livesey would gather footage of pigeons in an empty square in Florence early one morning which, in the final cut, would ] into the face of ].<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott believed it a good idea, as it fundamentally asked the question: Where is Hannibal Lecter? Scott explains: "And of course this story tells it, with pigeons in the cobblestones of somewhere, where you wonder where that is...and there he is his face appears."<ref name="makingdvd" /> The titles are said to have been influenced by the film '']''.<ref name="newtimh">{{cite news | first= Elvis| last= Mitchell| coauthors= | title=FILM REVIEW; Whetting That Large Appetite for Second Helpings | date= 9 February 2001| publisher= | url =http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B04E2D81431F93AA35751C0A9679C8B63 | work =New York Times | pages = | accessdate = 7 March 2007| language = }}</ref> The main titles were designed by Nick Livesey, a graduate of the ] who worked for one of Scott's production companies in London. The ], shot in ] by Livesey himself, was intended as the film's second promotional trailer.<ref name="makingdvd" /> The studio thought it not "quite right", but it remained on Scott's mind and would eventually end up as the main title sequence.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Livesey gathered footage of pigeons in an empty square in Florence early one morning which, in the final cut, would ] into the face of Hannibal Lecter.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott believed it a good idea, as it fundamentally asked the question: 'Where is Hannibal Lecter?' Scott explains: "And of course this story tells it, with pigeons in the cobblestones of somewhere, where you wonder where that is ... and there he is... his face appears."<ref name="makingdvd" /> The titles are said to have been influenced by the film '']''.<ref name="Mitchell">{{cite news| first= Elvis| last= Mitchell| title= FILM REVIEW; Whetting That Large Appetite for Second Helpings| date= 9 February 2001| url= https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/09/movies/film-review-whetting-that-large-appetite-for-second-helpings.html| newspaper= ]| access-date= 1 March 2021| archive-date= 12 February 2021| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210212162614/https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/09/movies/film-review-whetting-that-large-appetite-for-second-helpings.html| url-status= live}}</ref>


===Music=== ==Music==
Ridley Scott worked very closely with ] ], during ] on ''Hannibal''.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott believes the music to a film is as important as ] &mdash; "It is the final adjustment to the screenplay, being able to also adjust the performance of the actors in fact."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Zimmer and Scott sat in during the editing process with ] ] to discuss scenes in the film and "not music".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Zimmer used a ] for the ] sequence, but would mostly use what he described as a "very odd orchestra...only cellos and basses all playing at the extreme ends of their range." This was done to emphasise the character of Hannibal Lecter. He explains: "Anthony's character is for me somebody at the extreme range of whatever is humanly imaginable somehow." Zimmer also did not want the score to sound like a "modern day orchestra".<ref name="makingdvd" /> The character Mason Verger had his own "theme", which become more "perverted" as the movie progressed, according to Zimmer.<ref name="makingdvd" /> ]'s sonnet was put to music by Zimmer and ] for the ] scene in ].<ref name="vf">{{cite book | last = Clarke | first = James | authorlink = | title = Virgin Film: Ridley Scott | publisher = Virgin Books | year = 2002 | isbn = 0753507315 }}</ref> Tracksounds.com wrote positively of Zimmer's score. "Zimmer truly crafts a score worthy of most fans' full attention...the classical elements, and yes, even the monologue combine to make this an intense listening experience."<ref name="zimmerrev">{{cite news | first=Christopher | last=Coleman | coauthors= | title=Goodie, Goodie! | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.tracksounds.com/reviews/hannibal.htm | work =TrackSounds | pages = | accessdate = 9 March 2007| language = }}</ref> In a poll by ] listeners to find the greatest ] of all-time, ''Hannibal'' ranked at 59.<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Top 100 movie soundtracks | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.classicfm.com/article.asp?id=223575 | work =Classic FM | pages = | accessdate = 6 April 2007| language = }}</ref> Ridley Scott worked very closely with composer ], during ] on ''Hannibal''.<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott believes the music to a film is as important as ]"It is the final adjustment to the screenplay, being able to also adjust the performance of the actors in fact."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Zimmer, and Scott sat in during the editing process with ] ] to discuss scenes in the film and "not music".

The character Mason Verger had his own theme, which become more "perverted" as the film progressed, according to Zimmer.<ref name="makingdvd" /> ]'s sonnet was put to music by ] titled Vide cor Meum for the opera scene in ].<ref name="vf">{{cite book | last = Clarke | first = James | title = Virgin Film: Ridley Scott | publisher=Virgin Books | year = 2002 | isbn = 0-7535-0731-5 }}</ref> Tracksounds.com wrote positively of Zimmer's score. "Zimmer truly crafts a score worthy of most fans' full attention ... the classical elements, and yes, even the monologue combine to make this an intense listening experience."<ref name="zimmerrev">{{cite news|first=Christopher |last=Coleman |title=Goodie, Goodie! |url=http://www.tracksounds.com/reviews/hannibal.htm |work=TrackSounds |access-date=9 March 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070314204447/http://www.tracksounds.com/reviews/hannibal.htm |archive-date=14 March 2007}}</ref> In a poll by British ] listeners to find the greatest film ] of all time, ''Hannibal'' ranked at {{Abbr|No.|Number}} 59.<ref>{{cite news|title=Top 100 movie soundtracks |url=http://www.classicfm.com/article.asp?id=223575 |work=Classic FM |access-date=6 April 2007 }}{{dead link|date=April 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> ]'s '']'' is also played at several points in the film.


==Themes== ==Themes==
===Romance=== ===Romance===
Scott has said he believes the underlying emotion of the film ''Hannibal'' is "affection". "In some instances, you might even wonder or certainly from one direction &mdash; is it more than affection?<ref name="makingdvd" /> It is dark, because the story is of course essentially dark, but it's kind of romantic at the same time."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running though the film.<ref name="makingdvd" /> He told ] that: "''Hannibal'' was quite a different target, essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad behaviour as well."<ref name="cnnscott" /> During the ] scene in ], Lecter attends an operatic adaptation of one of ]'s ]s, and meets with Detetctive Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could... but would she see through the bars of his plight and ache for ''him''?" This scene, in the movie, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning of. It was in reference to Starling – to their encounter in ''The Silence of the Lambs''.<ref name="ridcom" /> '']'' in its ] of the film, said ''Hannibal'', "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name"<ref name="newtimh" /> Composer ] believes there to be "many" messages and subtext in each scene of the film.<ref name="makingdvd" /> He says "I can score this movie truly as a ]ian archetypal beauty and the beast ], as a ], as the most elegant piece, on corruption in the American police force, as the loneliest woman on earth, the beauty in renaissance..."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Zimmer ultimately believes it to be a dark love story, centering on two people who should never be together &mdash; a modern day '']''.<ref name="makingdvd" /> During ] of the film, Scott, Zimmer and the editor passionately argued about what a single shot meant, where a tear slides down Starling's cheek during a confrontation with Lecter. They could not agree if it was a tear of "anguish", "loneliness" or "disgust".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott told the '']'' that, the affair of the heart between Lecter and Starling is "]ical".<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Hannibal News | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.countingdown.com/movies/1203/news?item id=5800 | work =Counting Down | pages = | accessdate = 9 March 2007| language = }}</ref> '']'' even said in their review, "Scott offers a sly parody of relationships &mdash; think "When Hannibal met Sally."<ref name="rollingrevhan" /> Scott has said he believes the underlying emotion of ''Hannibal'' is "affection". "In some instances, you might even wonder or certainly from one direction—is it more than affection? It is dark, because the story is of course essentially dark, but it's kind of romantic at the same time."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running through the film.<ref name="makingdvd" /> He told ] that: "''Hannibal'' was quite a different target, essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad behaviour as well."<ref name="cnnscott" /> During the opera scene in ], Lecter attends an operatic adaptation of one of ]'s ]s, and meets with Detective Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could ... but would she see through the bars of his plight and ache for ''him''?" This scene, in the film, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning of. It was in reference to Starling—to their encounter in ''The Silence of the Lambs''.<ref name="ridcom" /> '']'', in its ] of the film, said ''Hannibal'', "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name".<ref name="Mitchell" />
Composer Hans Zimmer believed there were messages and subtext in each scene.<ref name="makingdvd" /> He said, "I can score this movie truly as a ]ian archetypal beauty and the beast ], as a ], as the most elegant piece, on corruption in the American police force, as the loneliest woman on earth, the beauty in renaissance ..."<ref name="makingdvd" /> Zimmer ultimately believes it to be a dark love story, centering on two people who should never be together—a modern-day '']''.<ref name="makingdvd" /> During ], Scott, Zimmer and the editor passionately argued about the meaning of Starling's tear during a confrontation with Lecter. They could not agree if it was a tear of "anguish", "loneliness" or "disgust".<ref name="makingdvd" /> Scott told the '']'' that, the affair of the heart between Lecter and Starling is metaphorical.<ref>{{cite news|title=Hannibal News |url=http://www.countingdown.com/movies/1203/news?item |id=5800 |work=Counting Down |access-date=9 March 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070917122005/http://www.countingdown.com/movies/1203/news?item |archive-date=17 September 2007}}</ref> '']'' magazine said in their review, "Scott offers a sly parody of relationships—think 'When Hannibal met Sally'."<ref name="rollingrevhan" />


===Retribution and punishment=== ===Retribution and punishment===
Scott has said he believed Lecter, in his own way, was "pure", whose motivation is the search for "retribution and punishment".<ref name="ridcom" /> "There is something very moral about Lecter in this film," said Scott in his audio commentary. "The behaviour of Hannibal is never insane— didn't want to use that excuse. Is he insane? No, I think he's as sane as you or I. He just likes it."<ref name="ridcom" /> Scott did say, however, "In our normal terms, he's truly evil."<ref name="ridcom" /> Scott also brings up the notion of ] in reference to Lecter towards the film's end.<ref name="ridcom" /> Verger has one overriding objective in life: to capture Lecter and subject him to a slow, painful death.<ref name="ideprev1">{{cite news | first=Mark | last=Wilson | title=Lecter's bloody second course has a hollow centre | date= 6 February 2001|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090204142404/http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/lecters-bloody-second-course-has-a-hollow-centre-690474.html|archive-date=4 February 2009| url =http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/reviews/article251440.ece |work=The Independent |location=London | url-status=dead | access-date =9 March 2007}}</ref>
Ridley Scott has said that he believes Lecter, in his own way, to be "pure" – one of the key motivating factors for the character is the search for "retribution and punishment".<ref name="ridcom" />

"There is something very moral about Lecter in this film," said Scott in his audio commentary. "The behaviour of Hannibal is never ] &mdash; didn’t want to use that excuse. Is he insane? No, I think he's as sane as you or I. He just likes it."<ref name="ridcom" /> Scott did say, however, "In our normal terms, he's truly ]."<ref name="ridcom" /> Scott also brings up the notion of ] in reference to Lecter towards the end of the film.<ref name="ridcom" /> Verger has one overriding objective in life: to capture Lecter and subject him to a slow, painful death. In this way, he replaces Lecter as the film's antagonist.<ref name="ideprev1">{{cite news | first=Mark | last=Wilson | coauthors= | title=Lecter's bloody second course has a hollow centre | date= 6 February 2001| publisher= | url =http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/reviews/article251440.ece | work =The Independent | pages = | accessdate = 9 March 2007| language = | location=London}}</ref>


===Corruption=== ===Corruption===
Part of the story involves the character Rinaldo Pazzi (]), a Florentine policeman who learns "Dr. Fell"'s true identity and realizes that this knowledge could make him rich. His escalating abandonment of morality allows him to countenance and facilitate the death of a ] pickpocket, egged on by the desire to have the best for his much younger wife.<ref name="ridcom" /> There is a moment in the film when Pazzi becomes corrupted, despite being what Scott describes as "very thoughtful".<ref name="ridcom" /> Paul Krendler also succumbs to greed and corruption. Starling does not, however, and perseveres to the end, even refusing to release Lecter when she believes he is about to cut off her hand in order to free himself. Part of the story involves the character Rinaldo Pazzi (]), a Florentine policeman who learns "Dr. Fell's" true identity and realizes that this knowledge could make him rich. His escalating abandonment of morality allows him to countenance and facilitate the death of a ] pickpocket, egged on by the desire to have the best for his much younger wife.<ref name="ridcom" /> There is a moment in the film when Pazzi becomes corrupted, despite being what Scott describes as "very thoughtful".<ref name="ridcom" />


==Promotion== ==Release==
===Marketing===
The first trailer appeared in theaters and was made available via the official website in early May 2000, over nine months before the film was released. As the film had only just begun production, footage was used from '']''. A second trailer, which featured footage from the new movie, was released in late November 2000. In marketing the film, Hopkins' portrayal of Hannibal Lecter was chosen as the unique selling point of ''Hannibal''. "Mr Hopkins is the draw here", said ] in a 2001 '']'' article.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9B04E2D81431F93AA35751C0A9679C8B63 |title=''Hannibal'' FILM REVIEW; Whetting That Large Appetite for Second Helpings |author=Elvis Mitchell |date=9 Feb 2001 |work=www.nytimes.com |publisher=The New York Times |accessdate=31 August 2010}}</ref> A poster released in the UK to promote ''Hannibal'', featuring Lecter with a "skin mask" covering the right side of his face, was quickly removed from circulation as it was deemed "too shocking and disturbing for the public."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/trivia?tr0748077 |title=''Hannibal'' trivia on imdb.com |work=idmb.com|accessdate=31 August 2010}}</ref>
The first trailer appeared in theaters and was made available via the official website in early May 2000, over nine months before the film's release. As the film had only just begun production, footage was used from ''The Silence of the Lambs''. A second trailer, which featured footage from the new film, was released in late November 2000. In marketing the film, Hopkins' portrayal of Hannibal Lecter was chosen as the unique selling point of ''Hannibal''. "Mr Hopkins is the draw here", said ] in a 2001 '']'' article.<ref name="Mitchell" /> A poster released in the UK to promote ''Hannibal'', featuring Lecter with a "skin mask" covering the right side of his face, was quickly removed from circulation as it was deemed "too shocking and disturbing for the public."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/trivia?tr0748077 |title=''Hannibal'' trivia on imdb.com |work=IMDB |access-date=31 August 2010 |archive-date=3 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303210141/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/trivia?tr0748077 |url-status=live }}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=IMDB not reliable|date=October 2021}}


Upon its release, ''Hannibal'' was met with significant media attention,<ref name="vf"/><ref name="cbs">{{cite web |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/08/entertainment/main270627.shtml?source=search_story |title=Taking A Bite Out Of ''Hannibal'' |author=Nick Sambides Jr. |date=8 Feb 2001 |publisher=www.cbsnews.com |accessdate=31 August 2010}}</ref> with the film's stars and director making several appearances on television, in newspapers and in magazines.<ref name="cbs1">{{cite web |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/02/entertainment/main269156.shtml |title=Appetites Whet For Hannibal |author=Jill Serjeant |date=2 Feb 2001 |work=MMI Reuters Limited |publisher=www.cbsnews.com |accessdate=31 August 2010}}</ref> In an article for ], Jill Serjeant stated that "the long-awaited sequel to the grisly 1991 thriller ''Silence of the Lambs'' is cooking up the hottest Internet and media buzz since the 1999 ]."<ref name="cbs1" /> Stars Anthony Hopkins and Julianne Moore made the covers of a number of magazines, including '']'', '']'', '']''<ref name="cbs" /> and '']''. Upon its release, ''Hannibal'' was met with significant media attention,<ref name="vf" /><ref name="cbs">{{cite news |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/08/entertainment/main270627.shtml?source=search_story |title=Taking A Bite Out Of ''Hannibal'' |first=Nick |last=Sambides Jr. |date=8 February 2001 |work=CBS News |access-date=31 August 2010 |archive-date=13 October 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013131916/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/08/entertainment/main270627.shtml?source=search_story |url-status=dead }}</ref> with the film's stars and director making several appearances on television, in newspapers and in magazines.<ref name="cbs1">{{cite news |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/02/entertainment/main269156.shtml |title=Appetites Whet For Hannibal |first=Jill |last=Serjeant |date=2 February 2001 |work=CBS News |access-date=31 August 2010 |archive-date=13 October 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013131911/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/02/02/entertainment/main269156.shtml |url-status=dead }}</ref> In an article for ], Jill Serjeant stated that "the long-awaited sequel to the grisly 1991 thriller ''Silence of the Lambs'' is cooking up the hottest Internet and media buzz since the 1999 ]."<ref name="cbs1" /> Stars Anthony Hopkins and Julianne Moore made the covers of a number of magazines, including '']'',<ref>{{cite magazine |title=The Passions of Julianne Moore |magazine=] |url= https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/2001/3/the-passions-of-julianne-moore |access-date=21 January 2024 |date=March 2001}}</ref> '']'',<ref>{{cite magazine |title=All the Secrets of Hannibal |magazine=] |number=581 |date=February 9, 2001}}</ref> '']'',<ref name="cbs" /> and '']''.<ref>{{cite magazine|title="What's cooking?" Hannibal heads up Empire's 'Bloody Valentine' Special |magazine=] |date=March 2001 |number=141}}</ref>


==Release== ===Distribution===
===Box office===
''Hannibal'' grossed $58 million (USA) in its opening weekend (from 3,230 screens). At the time (February 2001) this was the third-biggest debut ever&mdash;only 1997's '']'' and 1999's '']'' grossed more in an opening weekend.<ref name="abc1">{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Box Office: Hannibal Takes Record-Sized Bite | date=11 February 2001| publisher= | url =http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=109619&page=1 | work =ABC News | pages = | accessdate = 2007-06-08 | language = }}</ref> It was also, when it was released, the biggest opening ] for an ] movie ever.<ref name="abc1" /> Final domestic box office gross (USA) reached $165,092,268 with a worldwide gross of $351,692,268.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hannibal.htm |title=Hannibal (2001) |accessdate=6 March 2009|publisher=]}}</ref> The film spent three weeks at number one in the US box office chart, and four weeks at number one in the UK.<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Box Office | date= | publisher= | url =http://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/boxoffice | work =IMDB Pro | pages = | accessdate = 10 April 2007| language = }}</ref> ''Hannibal'' was the tenth highest grossing movie of the year worldwide,<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Box-Office data for Hannibal | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=2001&p=.htm | work =Boxofficemojo | pages = | accessdate = 10 March 2007| language = }}</ref> in a year which also saw the blockbuster releases of '']'' and '']''. ''Hannibal'' also made over $87,000,000 in US ] following release in August 2001.<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=US Video rentals | date= | publisher=IMDB | url =http://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/videorevenue | work = | pages = | accessdate = 10 April 2007| language = }}</ref>


] distributed the film in the United States and Canada, while Universal Pictures International handled international sales,<ref name="UPI" /> with ] handling distribution in most international territories except for Germany, Italy and Japan, which were handled by Tobis ], ] and GAGA Communications respectively.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cathy Dunkley |first=Dana Harris |date=2001-03-20 |title=Who gets Lecter's Lucre? |url=https://variety.com/2001/film/news/who-gets-lecter-s-lucre-1117795638/ |access-date=2024-06-09 |website=Variety |language=en-US}}</ref>
===Reception===
The reviews for ''Hannibal'' were mixed.<ref name="hannibalpe">{{cite book | last=Rob | first=Brian | title=Ridley Scott: Pocket Essential | publisher=Pocket Essentials | year=2005 | isbn=978-1-904048-47-3}}</ref><ref name="abc1" /><ref name="Theriddlerhashisday">{{cite news | first=David | last=Thomson | title=The Riddler Has His Day | year=2001 | url=http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/84/ | work=Sight & Sound | accessdate=9 April 2007}}</ref>


===Home media===
'']'' wrote: "A banquet of creepy, gory or grotesque incidents is on display in ''Hannibal''. But this superior ] has romance in its dark heart." '']'' gave it two out of five stars, calling it "...laughable to just plain boring, ''Hannibal'' is toothless to the end." David Thomson, writing in the ] magazine '']'', praised the film. "It works. It's smart, good-looking, sexy, fun...dirty, naughty and knowing."<ref name="Theriddlerhashisday" /> Thomson does make clear, however, he is a great fan of ] Ridley Scott's work.<ref name="Theriddlerhashisday" /> He adds: "It is, literally, that Hannibal Lecter has become such a household joke that he can't be dreadful again. It seems clear that Anthony Hopkins and Scott saw that, and planned accordingly. That's how the movie was saved."<ref name="Theriddlerhashisday" /> '']'' in its review said "''Hannibal'' is not as good as ''Lambs''... ultimately more shallow and crass at its heart than its predecessor, ''Hannibal'' is nevertheless tantalizing, engrossing and occasionally startling."<ref name="hannibalvariety">{{cite news | first=Todd | last=McCarthy | title=Hannibal Review | date=5 February 2001 | url=http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117797220.html?categoryid=31&cs=1 | work=Variety | accessdate= 9 April 2007| language = }}</ref> A negative review in '']'' claimed that what was wrong with the film was carried over from the book: "The result is an inflated, good-looking bore of a movie. ''The Silence of the Lambs'' was a marvelous thing. This, by contrast is barely okey-dokey."<ref>{{cite news | first=Xan | last=Brooks | title=Hannibal Review | date=16 February 2001 | url=http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_review/0,,438460,00.html | work=The Guardian | accessdate=9 April 2007| location=London}}</ref> ] gave the film a "Thumbs down" rating on the television program '']'' and gave the film a 2.5 out of 4 stars rating in his print review, which he began with the following: "Ridley Scott's ''Hannibal'' is a carnival geek show. We must give it credit for the courage of its depravity; if it proves nothing else, it proves that if a man cutting off his face and feeding it to his dogs doesn't get the ] for violence, nothing ever will."<ref>{{cite web | title=Hannibal | author=Roger Ebert | work=] | url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20010209/REVIEWS/102090301/1023 | publisher=suntimes.com | date=2001-02-09 | accessdate=2009-12-05}}</ref>
''Hannibal'' was released on ] and ] on August 21, 2001,<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Hettrick |first1=Scott |last2=Garrett |first2=Diane |date=May 2, 2001 |title='Hannibal' vid plans cooking |work=] |url=https://variety.com/2001/digital/features/hannibal-vid-plans-cooking-1117798451/ |access-date=April 8, 2023 |archive-date=8 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230408231732/https://variety.com/2001/digital/features/hannibal-vid-plans-cooking-1117798451/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and on ] on September 15, 2009.<ref>{{cite web|last=McCutcheon|first=David|title=Hannibal Lecter Eats Up|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2009/07/23/hannibal-lecter-eats-up|publisher=IGN|access-date=May 19, 2023|date=July 23, 2009|archive-date=19 May 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230519132731/https://www.ign.com/articles/2009/07/23/hannibal-lecter-eats-up|url-status=live}}</ref> A new transfer of the film was released on Blu-ray and ] by ] on May 7, 2019.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=24599|title=Hannibal 4K Blu-ray|date=6 February 2019|website=blu-ray.com|access-date=27 May 2019|archive-date=12 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190212195434/https://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=24599|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Hannibal (2001) - 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray Ultra HD Review {{!}} High Def Digest |url=https://ultrahd.highdefdigest.com/69750/hannibal4kultrahdbluray.html |access-date=2023-10-21 |website=ultrahd.highdefdigest.com}}</ref>

==Reception==
===Box office===
''Hannibal'' grossed $58 million (U.S.) in its opening weekend from 3,230 screens. At the time, this was the third-biggest debut ever behind 1997's '']'' and 1999's '']''.<ref name="abc1">{{cite news | title=Box Office: Hannibal Takes Record-Sized Bite | date=11 February 2001 | url=https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=109619&page=1 | work=ABC News | access-date=8 June 2007 | archive-date=29 January 2011 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110129160403/http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=109619&page=1 | url-status=live }}</ref> It went on to surpass '']'' to have the highest debut in February.<ref name="abc1" /> That record was surpassed by '']'' in 2004.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Susman|first=Gary|title=''Passion'' ties record with $125 million take records|url=https://ew.com/article/2004/03/02/passion-ties-record-125-million-take/|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=March 22, 2022|date=March 2, 2004}}</ref> The film also had the largest opening weekend for an R-rated film, beating '']''.<ref>{{cite news |last=Germain |first=David |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/112269970/hannibal-chews-up-record-books/ |title='Hannibal' chews up record books |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221101165808/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/112269970/hannibal-chews-up-record-books/ |date=February 13, 2001 |access-date=November 1, 2022 |archive-date=1 November 2022 |page=29 |work=The Associated Press |publisher=] |via=] |url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref> ''Hannibal'' would hold this record for two years until it was taken by '']'' in 2003.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/108202603/reloaded-sets-r-rated-record/ |title='Reloaded' sets R-rated record |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221107214658/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/108202603/reloaded-sets-r-rated-record/ |date=May 19, 2003 |access-date=November 7, 2022 |archive-date=November 7, 2022 |page=1 |publisher=] |via=] |url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref> Furthermore, it managed to beat out the Special Edition release of '']'' to have the highest winter opening weekend.<ref>{{cite web |last=Gray |first=Brandon |date=February 12, 2001 |title=Weekend Box Office |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/article/ed3665232900/ |access-date=September 17, 2023 |website=Box Office Mojo |archive-date=September 17, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230917030104/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/article/ed3665232900/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Final domestic box office gross (U.S.) reached $165,092,268, with a worldwide gross of $351,692,268.<ref name="mojo"/> The film spent three weeks at ] chart, and four weeks at ], and was the year's third highest-grossing film in that country behind '']'' and '']''.<ref>{{cite news | title=Box Office | url=https://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/boxoffice | work=IMDB Pro | access-date=10 April 2007 | archive-date=30 August 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140830020319/http://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/boxoffice | url-status=live }}</ref> In Italy, it grossed $4.6 million in its opening weekend, setting a record for a US release, beating '']''.<ref name=italy>{{cite magazine|magazine=]|page=12|date=19 February 2001 |title='Hannibal' appeals to all tastes o'seas |last=Groves|first=Don}}</ref> It also set a record opening week in the Netherlands with $1.3 million in six days, beating '']''. It also had the second biggest opening in Spain with $4.1 million in 6 days.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=]|page=10|date=March 5, 2001|title=Mel and Hel burp 'Hannibal' in Italy|last=Groves|first=Don}}</ref> ''Hannibal'' was the tenth highest-grossing film of the year worldwide.<ref>{{cite news | title=Box-Office data for Hannibal | url=https://boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=2001&p=.htm | work=Box Office Mojo | access-date=10 March 2007 | archive-date=10 April 2007 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070410133146/http://boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=2001&p=.htm | url-status=live }}</ref> ''Hannibal'' also made over $87,000,000 in U.S. ]s following release in August 2001.<ref>{{cite news | title=US Video rentals | publisher=IMDB | url=https://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/videorevenue | url-access=subscription | access-date=10 April 2007 | archive-date=30 August 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140830023012/http://pro.imdb.com/title/tt0212985/videorevenue | url-status=live }}</ref>


===Critical response===
''Hannibal'' currently has an overall ] rating of 57 out of 100 from 36 reviews, an IMDb rating of 6.5 out of 10 and a ] rating of 38 percent, with an average rating of five out of ten from 160 reviews.
The reviews for ''Hannibal'' were mixed-to-negative.<ref name="hannibalpe">{{cite book | last=Rob | first=Brian | title=Ridley Scott: Pocket Essential | publisher=Pocket Essentials | year=2005 | isbn=978-1-904048-47-3}}</ref><ref name="abc1" /><ref name="Theriddlerhashisday">{{cite news|first=David |last=Thomson |title=The Riddler Has His Day |year=2001 |url=http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/84/ |work=Sight & Sound |access-date=9 April 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011214840/http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/84/ |archive-date=11 October 2007}}</ref> On ], the film holds an approval rating of 39% based on 172 reviews, with an average rating of 5.1/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "While superbly acted and stylishly filmed, ''Hannibal'' lacks the character interaction between the two leads which made the first movie so engrossing."<ref>{{cite web |title=Hannibal (2001) |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1104385-hannibal |work=] |publisher=] |access-date=1 March 2021 |archive-date=9 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210509021628/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1104385-hannibal |url-status=live }}</ref> On ], the film has a rating of 57 out of 100 from 36 reviews.<ref name="metacritic">{{cite web|title=Hannibal Reviews|url=https://metacritic.com/movie/hannibal|work=]|publisher=]|access-date=6 March 2018|archive-date=7 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180107064450/http://www.metacritic.com/movie/hannibal|url-status=live}}</ref> Audiences surveyed by ] gave the film a grade "C+" on scale of A to F.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title=HANNIBAL (2001) C+ |work= ] |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= 2018-12-20 }}</ref>


'']'' magazine wrote: "A banquet of creepy, gory or grotesque incidents is on display in ''Hannibal''. But this superior sequel has romance in its dark heart."{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}} '']'' magazine gave it two out of five stars, calling it "laughable to just plain boring, ''Hannibal'' is toothless to the end."<ref>{{cite news | date=15 February 2001 | first=Ian | last=Nathan | title=Hannibal Review | url=https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/hannibal-review/ | work=] | access-date=17 January 2023 | archive-date=6 October 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006140022/https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/hannibal-review/ | url-status=live }}</ref> David Thomson, writing in the ] magazine '']'', praised the film. "It works. It's smart, good-looking, sexy, fun ... dirty, naughty and knowing."<ref name="Theriddlerhashisday" /> Thomson does make clear he is a great fan of director Ridley Scott's work.<ref name="Theriddlerhashisday" /> He adds: "It is, literally, that Hannibal Lecter has become such a household joke that he can't be dreadful again. It seems clear that Anthony Hopkins and Scott saw that, and planned accordingly. That's how the movie was saved."<ref name="Theriddlerhashisday" /> '']'' magazine in its review said "''Hannibal'' is not as good as ''Lambs'' ... ultimately more shallow and crass at its heart than its predecessor, ''Hannibal'' is nevertheless tantalizing, engrossing and occasionally startling."<ref name="hannibalvariety">{{cite news | date=5 February 2001 | first=Todd | last=McCarthy | title=Hannibal Review | url=https://variety.com/review/VE1117797220 | work=Variety | access-date=1 April 2021 | archive-date=20 July 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230720052428/https://variety.com/2001/film/reviews/hannibal-2-1200466959/ | url-status=live }}</ref>
==Home release==
''Hannibal'' is available as a one-disc and two-disc ]. The two disc DVD contains an array of special features including: ] by director ], deleted and alternate scenes, five making-of featurettes and a "marketing gallery" which contains trailers, production stills and unused ] concepts.


A negative review in '']'' claimed that what was wrong with the film was carried over from the book: "The result is an inflated, good-looking bore of a movie. ''The Silence of the Lambs'' was a marvelous thing. This, by contrast, is barely okey-dokey."<ref>{{cite news | first=Xan | last=Brooks | title=Hannibal Review | date=16 February 2001 | url=http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_review/0,,438460,00.html | work=The Guardian | location=London | access-date=9 April 2007 | archive-date=23 December 2007 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071223084742/http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_review/0,,438460,00.html | url-status=live }}</ref> ] gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4, and described ''Hannibal'' as "a carnival geek show elevated in the direction of art. It never quite gets there, but it tries with every fiber of its craft to redeem its pulp origins, and we must give it credit for the courage of its depravity," and although he was "left with admiration for Scott's craft in pulling off at all, and making it watchable", and praised the Mason Verger character as "a superb joining of skill and diabolical imagination," as well as Hopkins' performance as Lecter, which he described as "fascinating every second he is on the screen," he concluded, "I cannot approve of the movie, not because of its violence, which belongs to the ] tradition, but because the underlying story lacks the fascination of ''Silence of the Lambs''."<ref>{{cite news | date=9 February 2001 | title=Hannibal | author=Roger Ebert | author-link=Roger Ebert | url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/hannibal-2001 | newspaper=] | access-date=1 October 2021 | archive-date=28 September 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210928160635/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/hannibal-2001 | url-status=live }}</ref>
A special "steel-book" edition of Hannibal was released in 2007. There are no significant changes made to the DVD itself; only the package artwork was changed.


==Differences from the novel== ==Differences from the novel==
According to '']'' the script for ''Hannibal'' was: "...for better or worse, quite faithful to the Harris blueprint; fans of the tome may regret the perhaps necessary excision of some characters, most notably Mason Verger's muscle-bound macho sister ], as well as the considerable fascinating academic detail, but will basically feel the book has been respected (yes, even the climactic dinner party is served up intact, with the only surprise twists saved for its wake)."<ref name="hannibalvariety" /> '']'' in its review of ''Hannibal'' noted: "The weight-watchers script sensibly dispenses with several characters to serve a brew that's enjoyably spicy but low on substance. So much story is squeezed into 131 minutes that little time's left for analysis or characterization."<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Hannibal review | date= | publisher=Time Out Film Guide | url =http://www.timeout.com/film/dvd/63664.html | work = | pages = | accessdate = 16 April 2007| language = }}</ref> Producer ] was asked why some characters were left out of the film: "I think if you get a book which is 600 pages, you have to reduce it to a ] of 100 pages. In two hours of film, you cannot possibly include all the characters. We set ourselves a limit, and cut characters which weren't so vital."<ref>{{cite news | first=James | last=Mattram | coauthors= Al Kehoe | title=Interview: Dino De Laurentiis | year=2001 | publisher= | url =http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/dino_de_laurentis_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | work =BBC | pages = | accessdate = 7 June 2007| language = }}</ref> According to '']'' magazine, the script for ''Hannibal'' was: "quite faithful to the Harris blueprint; fans of the tome may regret the perhaps necessary excision of some characters, most notably Mason Verger's muscle-bound macho sister Margot, as well as the considerable fascinating academic detail, but will basically feel the book has been respected (yes, even the climactic dinner party is served up almost intact, with the only surprise twists saved for its wake)."<ref name="hannibalvariety" /> '']'' noted: "The weight-watchers script sensibly dispenses with several characters to serve a brew that's enjoyably spicy but low on substance. So much story is squeezed into 131 minutes that little time's left for analysis or characterization."<ref>{{cite news|title=Hannibal review |publisher=Time Out Film Guide |url=http://www.timeout.com/film/dvd/63664.html |access-date=16 April 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041228083806/http://www.timeout.com/film/dvd/63664.html |archive-date=28 December 2004}}</ref> Producer ] was asked why some characters, notably Jack Crawford, were left out of the film: "I think if you get a book which is 600 pages, you have to reduce it to a script of 100 pages. In two hours of film, you cannot possibly include all the characters. We set ourselves a limit, and cut characters which weren't so vital."<ref>{{cite news | first=James | last=Mattram | author2=Al Kehoe | title=Interview: Dino De Laurentiis | year=2001 | url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/dino_de_laurentis_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | work=BBC | access-date=7 June 2007 | archive-date=25 September 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150925050833/http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/12/dino_de_laurentis_hannibal_120201_interview.shtml | url-status=live }}</ref>


In the book, Mason Verger runs an orphanage, from which he calls children to verbally abuse as a substitute for his no longer being able to ] them. He also has a sister, Margot, whom he ]d when they were children and who is a ]. When she disclosed her ] to her family, their father disowned her. As she herself is sterile due to ] abuse, Verger exerts some control over her by promising her a ] sample with which to impregnate her lover, who could then ] the Verger fortune. Also, in the novel, Verger literally has no face and has to be kept in a sterile room at all times to keep ] from affecting exposed muscle and tissues. At the end of the book, Margot and Starling both help Lecter escape during a shootout between Starling and Verger's guards. Margot, at Lecter's advice, stimulates her brother to ejaculate with a ], and then kills him by ramming his pet ] down his throat. Following up on Krendler's fate in the book, the crooked ] official is killed when Lecter shoots him with an arrow. In the book, Mason Verger runs an orphanage, from which he calls children to verbally abuse as a substitute for his no longer being able to ] them. He also has a sister, Margot, whom he had raped when they were children and who is a lesbian. When she disclosed her ] to her family, their father disowned her. As she is sterile due to ] abuse, Verger exerts some control over her by promising her a ] sample with which to impregnate her lover, who could then ] the Verger fortune. At the book's end, Margot and Starling both help Lecter escape during a shootout between Starling and Verger's guards. Margot, at Lecter's advice, stimulates her brother to ejaculate with a rectally inserted ], and then kills him by ramming his pet ] down his throat.


The book's controversial ending has Lecter presenting Starling with the exhumed bones of her father, which he "brings to life" by ] Starling, allowing her to say goodbye. This forges an odd alliance between Starling and Lecter, culminating in their becoming lovers and escaping to ]. At the end of the novel, Barney (the hospital orderly) sees them at the ] of ]. The book's controversial ending has Lecter presenting Starling with the exhumed bones of her father, which he "brings to life" by ] Starling, allowing her to say goodbye. This forges an odd alliance between Starling and Lecter, culminating in their becoming lovers and escaping to ]. At the novel's end, Barney sees them at the ] of ].


Also gone from the film were the flashbacks to Lecter's childhood, in which he sees his younger sister, Mischa, eaten by German deserters in 1944. These flashbacks formed the basis for the 2007 film '']'' which portrays Lecter as a young man who eventually becomes the killer of the prior films. Also gone from the film are the flashbacks to Lecter's childhood, in which he sees his younger sister, Mischa, eaten by German deserters in 1944. These flashbacks formed the basis for the 2007 film '']'' (written concurrently with the ]) which portrays Lecter as a young man.


Hopkins was asked in an interview on the subject of whether or not he believed the idea of Starling and Lecter heading off into the sunset as lovers (as happens in the book). "Yes, I did. Other people found that preposterous. I suppose there's a moral issue there. I think it would have been a very interesting thing though. I think it would have been very interesting had she gone off, because I suspected that there was that romance, attachment there, that obsession with her. I guessed that a long time ago, at the last phone call to Clarice, at the end of ''SotL'', she said, 'Dr. Lecter, Dr. Lecter ... '."<ref>{{cite news | title=Interview with Anthony Hopkins | url=http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035935p1.html | work=IGN | access-date=13 March 2007 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070917042236/http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035935p1.html | archive-date=17 September 2007 | df=dmy-all }}</ref>
The character of ], while in the book, does not appear in the film.


==Other media==
Hopkins was asked in an interview on the subject of whether or not he believed the idea of Starling and Lecter heading off in to the sunset as lovers (as happens in the book). "Yes, I did. Other people found that preposterous. I suppose there's a moral issue there. I think it would have been a very interesting thing though. I think it would have been very interesting had she gone off, because I suspected that there was that romance, attachment there, that obsession with her. I guessed that a long time ago, at the last phone call to Clarice, at the end of '']'', she said, 'Dr. Lecter, Dr. Lecter...'."<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Interview with Anthony Hopkins | date= | publisher= | url = http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035935p1.html | work =IGN | pages = | accessdate = 13 March 2007| language = }}</ref>
===Prequels===
The film was followed by two films which are prequels based on novels by ] (although the novel of ''Red Dragon'' isn't itself a prequel as it was written before ''Hannibal''):


* '']'' (2002)
==Prequel==
{{Main|Hannibal Rising (film)}} * '']'' (2007)


==See also== ===In popular culture===
In 2014, there was a news story from Italy where a gangster fed his rival alive to pigs. Many media stories compared this to a similar scene in ''Hannibal''.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://nypost.com/2013/11/29/mobster-left-to-be-eaten-alive-by-pigs/ | title=Mobster left to be eaten alive by pigs | publisher=NY Post | date=29 November 2013 | access-date=21 June 2014 | last=Calder | first=Rich | archive-date=17 August 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200817133017/https://nypost.com/2013/11/29/mobster-left-to-be-eaten-alive-by-pigs/ | url-status=live }}</ref>{{Citation needed|reason=Text claims "Many" and that requires multiple sources|date=October 2021}}
* ] – the song from the opera in Florence

Five months after the film's release, the renowned '']'' episode ] featured ] attempting to train a pony to bite his titular rival Scott Tenorman, directly citing "the deformed guy" from Hannibal for such a scheme.{{Portal|Film}}

==Notes==
{{Notelist}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|2}} {{Reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{wikiquote|Hannibal (film)}}
{{Portal|Film}}
{{wikiquote}}
* {{official|http://www.hannibalmovie.com}}
* {{IMDb title|0212985|Hannibal}} * {{IMDb title|0212985|Hannibal}}
* {{Allmovie title|233530|Hannibal}} * {{TCMDb title|451729|Hannibal}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|1104385-hannibal|Hannibal}} * {{rotten-tomatoes|1104385-hannibal|Hannibal}}
* {{metacritic film|hannibal|Hannibal}} * {{Metacritic film|title=Hannibal}}
* {{mojo title|hannibal|Hannibal}} * {{mojo title|hannibal|Hannibal}}
* *


<!--Split film/book article intentional - Please do not remove this comment-->
{{Hannibal}} {{Hannibal}}
{{Ridley Scott Films}} {{Ridley Scott}}
{{David Mamet}}
{{Steven Zaillian}}
{{Authority control}}


{{Good article}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hannibal (Film)}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Hannibal (Film)}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]

{{Link GA|es}}

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 14:47, 27 December 2024

2001 film by Ridley Scott

Hannibal
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRidley Scott
Screenplay by
Based onHannibal
by Thomas Harris
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyJohn Mathieson
Edited byPietro Scalia
Music byHans Zimmer
Production
companies
Distributed by
Release date
  • 9 February 2001 (2001-02-09)
Running time131 minutes
Country
  • United States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$87 million
Box office$351.6 million

Hannibal is a 2001 American horror film directed by Ridley Scott, based on the 1999 novel by Thomas Harris. A sequel to the 1991 film The Silence of the Lambs, the plot follows disgraced FBI special agent Clarice Starling as she attempts to apprehend the cannibalistic serial killer Hannibal Lecter before his surviving victim, Mason Verger, captures him. Anthony Hopkins reprises his role as Lecter, while Julianne Moore replaces Jodie Foster as Starling and Gary Oldman plays Verger. Ray Liotta, Frankie R. Faison, Giancarlo Giannini, and Francesca Neri also star.

Harris published Hannibal eleven years after the publication of The Silence of the Lambs (1988). Scott became attached while directing Gladiator (2000), and signed on after reading the script pitched by Dino De Laurentiis, who had produced Manhunter (1986), the first Lecter film. David Mamet and Steven Zaillian wrote the screenplay, and principal photography commenced in May 2000, lasting sixteen weeks.

Hannibal was released on 9 February 2001 by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer in the United States and internationally by Universal Pictures, ten years after The Silence of the Lambs. It was highly anticipated and broke box office records in the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, and grossed $351.6 million during its theatrical run, becoming the tenth-highest-grossing film of 2001, but received mixed reviews; critics praised the performances and visuals, but deemed it inferior to The Silence of the Lambs and criticized its violence. It was followed by a prequel, Red Dragon, in 2002, with Hopkins reprising his role as Lecter and Brett Ratner taking over as director.

Plot

A decade after the death of serial killer Jame Gumb and the escape of cannibalistic serial killer Hannibal Lecter, FBI Special Agent Clarice Starling is blamed for a botched drug raid that resulted in five deaths. This attracts the attention of Mason Verger, Lecter's only surviving victim. A wealthy child molester, Verger was paralyzed and disfigured by Lecter and has been scheming to torture and kill him ever since. Using his wealth and political influence, Verger has Starling reassigned to Lecter's case, hoping her involvement will draw out Lecter from hiding. He is aided by corrupt Justice Department official Paul Krendler, who is upset that Starling refused to sleep with him.

After learning of Starling's disgrace, Lecter sends her a letter; he is hiding in Florence under the false identity of library curator "Dr. Fell." A perfume expert identifies the fragrance on the letter: skin cream with unusual ingredients available in only a few shops. Krendler sexually propositions Starling again, implying that he can save her career, but she rebuffs him.

Florentine policeman Rinaldo Pazzi questions Lecter about the death of Dr. Fell's predecessor. When Starling asks Pazzi for a local fragrance shop's security footage, Pazzi realizes Dr. Fell is Lecter. To claim Verger's $3 million bounty for Lecter, Pazzi agrees to help Verger's men kidnap Lecter without police involvement. However, Lecter subdues Pazzi and forces him to confess. Lecter then disembowels Pazzi and hangs him from the balcony of the Palazzo Vecchio.

Verger bribes Krendler to frame Starling for hiding evidence against Lecter, leading to her suspension. Lecter summons Starling to Washington Union Station, where he encourages her to quit her job. However, Verger's men trail Starling and capture Lecter.

Starling infiltrates Verger's estate, where she learns that Verger intends to feed Lecter alive to a herd of purpose-bred giant forest hogs. She frees Lecter from the hog pen but a guard shoots her. The hogs devour the guards but ignore Lecter. Verger orders Cordell, his physician, to shoot Lecter, but Lecter offers to take the blame if Cordell kills Verger instead. Cordell, who dislikes Verger, shoves him into the pen, where the hogs eat him alive. Lecter carries an unconscious Starling to safety.

Starling awakens in Krendler's home, wearing an unfamiliar cocktail dress. Although Lecter has sedated her and Krendler, she remembers to call the police. She then finds Lecter preparing an elegant dinner, during which Krendler lobs misogynistic insults at her. He then insults Lecter's cooking. Lecter opens Krendler's skull, removes part of his brain, sautées it, and feeds it to Krendler. Although Lecter hopes to impress Starling by torturing her oppressor, she is horrified.

Starling attacks Lecter, but he overpowers and kisses her. She handcuffs their wrists together. Hearing the police arrive, Lecter raises a cleaver over her wrist. The film cuts to Starling raising both hands to meet the police.

On a flight, Lecter, his arm in a sling, shares Krendler's brain with a curious boy, saying it is important to "try new things.”

Cast

Development

The Silence of the Lambs, based on the 1988 novel by Thomas Harris, was released in 1991 to critical and commercial success, winning five Academy Awards. Harris spent several years writing a sequel novel; Silence of the Lambs director Jonathan Demme expressed interest in developing a film adaptation when the novel was complete.

The film rights to the Lecter character were owned by producer couple Dino De Laurentiis and Martha De Laurentiis. After producing the first Lecter film, Manhunter, in 1986, they allowed Orion Pictures to produce The Silence of the Lambs free without their involvement. When The Silence of the Lambs became a success, the couple became eager for a new Lecter novel they could adapt. After a lengthy wait, De Laurentiis received a call from Harris telling him he had finished the novel and De Laurentiis purchased the rights for a record $10 million.

In April 1999, the Los Angeles Times reported that the budget for an adaptation of Hannibal could cost as much as $100 million. It speculated that both Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins would receive $15 million each to reprise their roles and that Demme would receive $5 million to $19 million. Mort Janklow, Harris's agent at the time, told the Los Angeles Times that Foster, Hopkins, and Demme would soon receive manuscripts of the novel, claiming it would make an unbelievable film. The novel sold out of its initial 1.6 million print run in 1999, and went on to sell millions of copies.

Demme declined the invitation to direct, as he reportedly found the material lurid and too gory. In the 2010 Biography Channel documentary Inside Story: The Silence of the Lambs, Demme said: "Tom Harris, as unpredictable as ever, took Clarice and Dr. Lecter's relationship in a direction that just didn't compute for me. And Clarice is drugged up, and she's eating brains with him, and I just thought, 'I can't do this.'" De Laurentiis said of Demme's decision to decline: "When the pope dies, we create a new pope. Good luck to Jonathan Demme. Good-bye." He later said that Demme felt he could not make a sequel as good as The Silence of the Lambs.

Ridley Scott

De Laurentiis visited Ridley Scott on the set of Gladiator and suggested he direct Hannibal. Scott, who was conducting principal photography on Gladiator, thought De Laurentiis was speaking about the Carthaginian general and replied: "Dino, I'm doing a Roman epic right now. I don't wanna do elephants coming over the Alps next, old boy."

Scott read the manuscript in four sittings within a week, seeing it as a "symphony", and expressed his desire to direct. He said: "I haven't read anything so fast since The Godfather. It was so rich in all kinds of ways." Scott had reservations with the ending of the novel, in which Lecter and Starling become lovers: "I couldn't take that quantum leap emotionally on behalf of Starling. Certainly, on behalf of Hannibal—I'm sure that's been in the back of his mind for a number of years. But for Starling, no. I think one of the attractions about Starling to Hannibal is what a straight arrow she is." He also did not find the book believable after the opera scene, "which became like a vampire movie". Harris gave Scott permission to change the ending.

Writing

Ted Tally, screenwriter for The Silence of the Lambs, was another key member of the Silence of the Lambs team to decline involvement. Tally, like Demme, had problems with the novel's "excesses". David Mamet was the first screenwriter to produce a draft, which, according to Scott and the producers, needed major revisions. Stacey Snider, co-chairman of Universal Pictures, said: "There's no way David was going to read 15 pages of our notes and then be available to work on the script day-to-day." A script review at ScreenwritersUtopia.com describes the Mamet draft as "stunningly bad" but found Zaillian's rewrite "gripping entertainment". Scott praised Mamet as fast and efficient, but said he passed on his draft because it needed work and he feared Mamet, who was soon directing his own film, would be too busy to redraft it.

Steven Zaillian, writer of Schindler's List, initially declined to write Hannibal, saying he was busy and that "you can almost never win when you do a sequel". He changed his mind, as "it's hard to say no to Dino once and it's almost impossible to say no to him twice". Scott said there were "very few rewrites once I brought in Steve Zaillian ... If you were to ask who were the best three screenwriters in the business, Steve Zaillian would be one of them. We discussed Hannibal endlessly." One of Zaillian's key objectives was to revise Mamet's script until it pleased all parties, meaning that the "love story" would be told by suggestion instead of by "assault". Scott worked through the script with Zaillian for 28 days, making him "sweat through it with him and discuss every inch of the way with him". After 25 days, Scott realized that Zaillian was "exorcising the 600 pages of the book. He was distilling through discussion what he was gonna finally do ... Frankly I could have just made it."

Casting

It was unclear if Jodie Foster (Clarice Starling) and Anthony Hopkins (Hannibal Lecter) would reprise their respective roles for which they won Academy Awards in The Silence of the Lambs (Best Actress/Best Actor). Both Hopkins and Foster had expressed interest. It became apparent that the producers and the studio could do without one of the original "stars" and would go on to find a replacement. The withdrawal of both Foster and Hopkins could possibly have been terminal for the project, however. De Laurentiis confirmed this after the film's release: "First and foremost, I knew we had no movie without Anthony Hopkins."

Involvement of Jodie Foster

Foster told Larry King in 1997 that she "would definitely be part of" a sequel to The Silence of the Lambs. In the same year, she told Entertainment Weekly: "Anthony Hopkins always talks about it. I mean, everybody wants to do it. Every time I see him, it's like: 'When is it going to happen? When is it going to happen?'" De Laurentiis thought Foster would decline once she read the book, and believed the final film was better for it. Hopkins also had doubts Foster would be involved, saying he had a "hunch" she would not be.

Foster confirmed that she had turned down the film in December 1999. This caused problems for Universal and production partner Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM). "The studio is just back from the holiday and is regrouping based on the news, and has no cohesive game plan at the moment," said Kevin Misher, Universal's President of Production. Misher added that, "It was one of those moments when you sit down and think, 'Can Clarice be looked upon as James Bond for instance? A character who is replaceable?' Or was Jodie Foster Clarice Starling, and the audience will not accept anyone else?" Foster said in December 1999 that the characterization of Starling in Hannibal had "negative attributes" and "betrayed" the original character.

Foster's spokeswoman said she declined because Claire Danes had become available for Foster's film Flora Plum. Entertainment Weekly described the Hannibal project as having become "a bloody mess, hemorrhaging talent and money" despite Hopkins being on board. In 2005, after the film had been released, Foster told Total Film: "The official reason I didn't do Hannibal is I was doing another movie, Flora Plum. So I get to say, in a nice dignified way, that I wasn't available when that movie was being shot ... Clarice meant so much to Jonathan and I, she really did, and I know it sounds kind of strange to say but there was no way that either of us could really trample on her."

Julianne Moore as Clarice Starling

When it became clear that Foster would skip Hannibal, the production team considered several different actresses, including Cate Blanchett, Angelina Jolie, Gillian Anderson, Hilary Swank, Ashley Judd, Helen Hunt and Julianne Moore. Hopkins asked his agent if he had any "power" over casting. He informed De Laurentiis that he knew Moore, with whom he had worked on Surviving Picasso, and thought her a "terrific actress". Although Hopkins' agent told him he had no contractual influence on casting, Scott thought it correct to discuss who would be Hopkins' "leading lady". Scott said he was "really surprised to find that had five of the top actresses in Hollywood wanting it." In order to star in Hannibal, Moore would decline to play a role in Unbreakable.

Scott said his decision was swayed in favor of Moore: "She is a true chameleon. She can be a lunatic in Magnolia, a vamp in An Ideal Husband, a porn star in Boogie Nights and a romantic in The End of the Affair." "Julianne Moore, once Jodie decided to pass, was always top of my list," said Scott on his female lead. Moore talked about stepping into a role made famous by another actress: "The new Clarice would be very different. Of course people are going to compare my interpretation with that of Jodie Foster's ... but this film is going to be very different."

Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter

Hannibal Lecter's t-shirt worn by Hopkins in Hannibal on display at the London Film Museum

Hopkins was generally expected to reprise his Academy Award-winning role. Hopkins said in June 1999 that he would only be interested if the script was "really good". Hopkins said he could not make up his mind to commit: "I was kind of surprised by this book, Hannibal. I thought it was really overreaching and so bizarre. So I couldn't make up my mind about it all. Some of it I found intriguing, some I was a little doubtful about." When the producers confirmed that they were going to film Harris' novel, Hopkins told them yes, but added: "It needs some condensing." The Hollywood Reporter confirmed that Hopkins had agreed to reprise his role in late December 1999, saying he had approved the latest draft of the script.

Hopkins said he had no difficulty moving back into "Lecter's mind". "I just learned the lines and showed up and walked around as Hannibal Lecter. I thought, 'Do I repeat that same performance, or do I vary it?' Ten years had passed so I changed a bit." In the book, Lecter uses bandages to disguise himself as a plastic surgery patient. This was left out of the film because Scott and Hopkins agreed to leave the face alone. Hopkins said: "It's as if he's making a statement—'catch me if you can'. With his big hat, he's so obvious that nobody thinks he's Hannibal Lecter. I've always thought he's a very elegant man, a Renaissance man." In the film, Lecter is first seen in Florence "as the classical Lecter, lecturing and being smooth", according to Hopkins. When the film moves to the US, Hopkins changed his appearance by building up muscle and cropping his hair short "to make him like a mercenary, that he would be so fit and so strong that he could just snap somebody in two if they got ... in his way".

Gary Oldman as Mason Verger

The part of Mason Verger, one of Lecter's two surviving victims, was originally offered to Christopher Reeve based on his work as a police officer who uses a wheelchair in Above Suspicion (1995). Not having read the novel, Reeve showed initial interest in the role, but ultimately declined upon realizing that Verger was a quadriplegic, facially-disfigured child rapist. The part was later accepted by secondary choice Gary Oldman. Co-producer Martha De Laurentiis claimed they had a "funny situation" with Oldman wanting a prominent "credit". She said: "Now how can you have a prominent credit with Hannibal? The characters are Hannibal and Clarice Starling. So we really couldn't work something out (at first)." Oldman was apparently "out" of the film for a while, but then came back in, asking to go "unbilled". Oldman would become transformed and "unrecognizable as himself" to play the part of Verger. He would have no lips, cheeks or eyelids. Make-up artist Greg Cannom said: "It's really disgusting ... I've been showing people pictures , and they all just say 'Oh my God,' and walk away, which makes me very happy." Oldman said that having his name completely removed from the billing and credits allowed him to "do it anonymously" under the heavy make-up.

Further casting

Other stars subsequently cast included Ray Liotta as U.S. Justice Department official Paul Krendler (the character had appeared in The Silence of the Lambs, but original actor Ron Vawter had died in the interim) and Italian actor Giancarlo Giannini as Detective Rinaldo Pazzi. Francesca Neri played Pazzi's wife, Allegra. Frankie Faison reprised his role as orderly Barney Matthews, remaining the only actor to play a role in all Lecter feature films (until Hannibal Rising in 2007), including Manhunter.

Key production crew

Scott recruited the key production crew whom he had worked with previously. Production designer Norris Spencer had worked on Thelma & Louise, Black Rain and 1492: Conquest of Paradise. Cinematographer John Mathieson, editor Pietro Scalia and composer Hans Zimmer had all worked on Scott's previous film Gladiator.

Production

Background

Hannibal was filmed in 83 working days over 16 weeks. The film began production on 8 May 2000 in Florence, Italy. The film visited key locations in Florence and various locations around the United States. Martha De Laurentiis said the film has almost a hundred locations and that it was a "constant pain of moving and dressing sets. But the locations were beautiful. Who could complain about being allowed to shoot in Palazzo Vecchio in Florence? Or President James Madison's farm in Montpelier or the amazing Biltmore Estate in Asheville?" Eighty million dollars and a year and a half in production were spent before Scott got his first look at Hannibal in the editing room.

Filming locations

  • The whole second act of Hannibal takes place in Florence. Ridley Scott had never filmed there before, but described it as "quite an experience ... It was kind of organized chaos ... We were there at the height of tourist season." Within Florence, the production would visit various locations such as the Palazzo Capponi (as Dr. Fell's workplace), the Ponte Vecchio, the Palazzo Vecchio, the Pharmacy of Santa Maria Novella and the Cathedral.
  • After leaving Italy on 5 June 2000, the production moved to Washington, D.C. Filming took place over six days at Washington Union Station. The unusual sight of a carousel appeared in the transportation hub and shopping plaza at Ridley Scott's request.
  • Filming lasted for seven weeks in Richmond, Virginia for the shootout in a crowded fish market (shot at Richmond Farmer's Market) early in the film. Julianne Moore underwent FBI training at the Bureau's headquarters before filming.
  • A barn in Orange, Virginia, situated on the estate of President James Madison, was used to house 15 "performing hogs". The 15 Russian boars used in the shoot were from a selection of around 6,000 that the animal wranglers observed.
  • Biltmore Estate in Asheville, North Carolina, the biggest privately owned estate in the US, was chosen to signify the huge personal wealth of Mason Verger.

Special make-up effects

Make-up artist Greg Cannom was pleased to be involved in Hannibal as it offered him the chance to produce "incredible and original make-ups". For Mason Verger, the make-up team initially produced 20 different heads which looked like zombies and did not reflect the vision Scott had of the character. Scott wanted Verger to look real with hideous scarring, and not something from the "House of Wax". Scott himself called on the help of expert doctors in an effort to get the look of the character as realistic as possible. Scott showed the make-up team pictures of foetal things, which he thought touching; he wanted to make Mason Verger more touching than monstrous, as he thought of Verger as being someone who hadn't lost his sense of humour, almost sympathetic. Oldman spent six hours a day in make-up to prepare for the role.

For one of the film's final and infamous scenes, an exact duplicate was created of the character Paul Krendler, played by Ray Liotta, a scene which blended make-up, puppet work and CGI in a way which Scott called "seamless".

Title sequence

The main titles were designed by Nick Livesey, a graduate of the Royal College of Art who worked for one of Scott's production companies in London. The sequence, shot in Florence by Livesey himself, was intended as the film's second promotional trailer. The studio thought it not "quite right", but it remained on Scott's mind and would eventually end up as the main title sequence. Livesey gathered footage of pigeons in an empty square in Florence early one morning which, in the final cut, would morph into the face of Hannibal Lecter. Scott believed it a good idea, as it fundamentally asked the question: 'Where is Hannibal Lecter?' Scott explains: "And of course this story tells it, with pigeons in the cobblestones of somewhere, where you wonder where that is ... and there he is... his face appears." The titles are said to have been influenced by the film Seven.

Music

Ridley Scott worked very closely with composer Hans Zimmer, during post-production on Hannibal. Scott believes the music to a film is as important as dialogue—"It is the final adjustment to the screenplay, being able to also adjust the performance of the actors in fact." Zimmer, and Scott sat in during the editing process with editor Pietro Scalia to discuss scenes in the film and "not music".

The character Mason Verger had his own theme, which become more "perverted" as the film progressed, according to Zimmer. Dante's sonnet was put to music by Patrick Cassidy titled Vide cor Meum for the opera scene in Florence. Tracksounds.com wrote positively of Zimmer's score. "Zimmer truly crafts a score worthy of most fans' full attention ... the classical elements, and yes, even the monologue combine to make this an intense listening experience." In a poll by British Classic FM listeners to find the greatest film soundtrack of all time, Hannibal ranked at No. 59. Strauss's The Blue Danube is also played at several points in the film.

Themes

Romance

Scott has said he believes the underlying emotion of Hannibal is "affection". "In some instances, you might even wonder or certainly from one direction—is it more than affection? It is dark, because the story is of course essentially dark, but it's kind of romantic at the same time." Scott openly admits to a "romantic thematic" running through the film. He told CNN that: "Hannibal was quite a different target, essentially a study between two individuals. Funny enough, it's rather romantic and also quite humorous, but also there's some quite bad behaviour as well." During the opera scene in Florence, Lecter attends an operatic adaptation of one of Dante's sonnets, and meets with Detective Pazzi and his wife, Allegra. She asks Lecter, "Do you believe a man could become so obsessed by a woman after a single encounter?" Lecter replies: "Yes, I believe he could ... but would she see through the bars of his plight and ache for him?" This scene, in the film, is one which Scott claims most people "missed" the meaning of. It was in reference to Starling—to their encounter in The Silence of the Lambs. The New York Times, in its review of the film, said Hannibal, "toys" with the idea of "love that dare not speak its name".

Composer Hans Zimmer believed there were messages and subtext in each scene. He said, "I can score this movie truly as a Freudian archetypal beauty and the beast fairy tale, as a horror movie, as the most elegant piece, on corruption in the American police force, as the loneliest woman on earth, the beauty in renaissance ..." Zimmer ultimately believes it to be a dark love story, centering on two people who should never be together—a modern-day Romeo and Juliet. During post-production, Scott, Zimmer and the editor passionately argued about the meaning of Starling's tear during a confrontation with Lecter. They could not agree if it was a tear of "anguish", "loneliness" or "disgust". Scott told the New York Post that, the affair of the heart between Lecter and Starling is metaphorical. Rolling Stone magazine said in their review, "Scott offers a sly parody of relationships—think 'When Hannibal met Sally'."

Retribution and punishment

Scott has said he believed Lecter, in his own way, was "pure", whose motivation is the search for "retribution and punishment". "There is something very moral about Lecter in this film," said Scott in his audio commentary. "The behaviour of Hannibal is never insane— didn't want to use that excuse. Is he insane? No, I think he's as sane as you or I. He just likes it." Scott did say, however, "In our normal terms, he's truly evil." Scott also brings up the notion of absolution in reference to Lecter towards the film's end. Verger has one overriding objective in life: to capture Lecter and subject him to a slow, painful death.

Corruption

Part of the story involves the character Rinaldo Pazzi (Giancarlo Giannini), a Florentine policeman who learns "Dr. Fell's" true identity and realizes that this knowledge could make him rich. His escalating abandonment of morality allows him to countenance and facilitate the death of a Romani pickpocket, egged on by the desire to have the best for his much younger wife. There is a moment in the film when Pazzi becomes corrupted, despite being what Scott describes as "very thoughtful".

Release

Marketing

The first trailer appeared in theaters and was made available via the official website in early May 2000, over nine months before the film's release. As the film had only just begun production, footage was used from The Silence of the Lambs. A second trailer, which featured footage from the new film, was released in late November 2000. In marketing the film, Hopkins' portrayal of Hannibal Lecter was chosen as the unique selling point of Hannibal. "Mr Hopkins is the draw here", said Elvis Mitchell in a 2001 The New York Times article. A poster released in the UK to promote Hannibal, featuring Lecter with a "skin mask" covering the right side of his face, was quickly removed from circulation as it was deemed "too shocking and disturbing for the public."

Upon its release, Hannibal was met with significant media attention, with the film's stars and director making several appearances on television, in newspapers and in magazines. In an article for CBS News, Jill Serjeant stated that "the long-awaited sequel to the grisly 1991 thriller Silence of the Lambs is cooking up the hottest Internet and media buzz since the 1999 Star Wars 'prequel'." Stars Anthony Hopkins and Julianne Moore made the covers of a number of magazines, including Vanity Fair, Entertainment Weekly, Premiere, and Empire.

Distribution

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer distributed the film in the United States and Canada, while Universal Pictures International handled international sales, with United International Pictures handling distribution in most international territories except for Germany, Italy and Japan, which were handled by Tobis StudioCanal, Filmauro and GAGA Communications respectively.

Home media

Hannibal was released on VHS and DVD on August 21, 2001, and on Blu-ray on September 15, 2009. A new transfer of the film was released on Blu-ray and Ultra HD Blu-ray by Kino Lorber on May 7, 2019.

Reception

Box office

Hannibal grossed $58 million (U.S.) in its opening weekend from 3,230 screens. At the time, this was the third-biggest debut ever behind 1997's The Lost World: Jurassic Park and 1999's Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace. It went on to surpass Scream 3 to have the highest debut in February. That record was surpassed by The Passion of the Christ in 2004. The film also had the largest opening weekend for an R-rated film, beating Scary Movie. Hannibal would hold this record for two years until it was taken by The Matrix Reloaded in 2003. Furthermore, it managed to beat out the Special Edition release of Star Wars to have the highest winter opening weekend. Final domestic box office gross (U.S.) reached $165,092,268, with a worldwide gross of $351,692,268. The film spent three weeks at number one in the U.S. box office chart, and four weeks at number one in the UK, and was the year's third highest-grossing film in that country behind Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. In Italy, it grossed $4.6 million in its opening weekend, setting a record for a US release, beating The Blair Witch Project. It also set a record opening week in the Netherlands with $1.3 million in six days, beating Independence Day. It also had the second biggest opening in Spain with $4.1 million in 6 days. Hannibal was the tenth highest-grossing film of the year worldwide. Hannibal also made over $87,000,000 in U.S. video rentals following release in August 2001.

Critical response

The reviews for Hannibal were mixed-to-negative. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 39% based on 172 reviews, with an average rating of 5.1/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "While superbly acted and stylishly filmed, Hannibal lacks the character interaction between the two leads which made the first movie so engrossing." On Metacritic, the film has a rating of 57 out of 100 from 36 reviews. Audiences surveyed by CinemaScore gave the film a grade "C+" on scale of A to F.

Time magazine wrote: "A banquet of creepy, gory or grotesque incidents is on display in Hannibal. But this superior sequel has romance in its dark heart." Empire magazine gave it two out of five stars, calling it "laughable to just plain boring, Hannibal is toothless to the end." David Thomson, writing in the British Film Institute magazine Sight & Sound, praised the film. "It works. It's smart, good-looking, sexy, fun ... dirty, naughty and knowing." Thomson does make clear he is a great fan of director Ridley Scott's work. He adds: "It is, literally, that Hannibal Lecter has become such a household joke that he can't be dreadful again. It seems clear that Anthony Hopkins and Scott saw that, and planned accordingly. That's how the movie was saved." Variety magazine in its review said "Hannibal is not as good as Lambs ... ultimately more shallow and crass at its heart than its predecessor, Hannibal is nevertheless tantalizing, engrossing and occasionally startling."

A negative review in The Guardian claimed that what was wrong with the film was carried over from the book: "The result is an inflated, good-looking bore of a movie. The Silence of the Lambs was a marvelous thing. This, by contrast, is barely okey-dokey." Roger Ebert gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4, and described Hannibal as "a carnival geek show elevated in the direction of art. It never quite gets there, but it tries with every fiber of its craft to redeem its pulp origins, and we must give it credit for the courage of its depravity," and although he was "left with admiration for Scott's craft in pulling off at all, and making it watchable", and praised the Mason Verger character as "a superb joining of skill and diabolical imagination," as well as Hopkins' performance as Lecter, which he described as "fascinating every second he is on the screen," he concluded, "I cannot approve of the movie, not because of its violence, which belongs to the Grand Guignol tradition, but because the underlying story lacks the fascination of Silence of the Lambs."

Differences from the novel

According to Variety magazine, the script for Hannibal was: "quite faithful to the Harris blueprint; fans of the tome may regret the perhaps necessary excision of some characters, most notably Mason Verger's muscle-bound macho sister Margot, as well as the considerable fascinating academic detail, but will basically feel the book has been respected (yes, even the climactic dinner party is served up almost intact, with the only surprise twists saved for its wake)." Time Out noted: "The weight-watchers script sensibly dispenses with several characters to serve a brew that's enjoyably spicy but low on substance. So much story is squeezed into 131 minutes that little time's left for analysis or characterization." Producer Dino De Laurentiis was asked why some characters, notably Jack Crawford, were left out of the film: "I think if you get a book which is 600 pages, you have to reduce it to a script of 100 pages. In two hours of film, you cannot possibly include all the characters. We set ourselves a limit, and cut characters which weren't so vital."

In the book, Mason Verger runs an orphanage, from which he calls children to verbally abuse as a substitute for his no longer being able to molest them. He also has a sister, Margot, whom he had raped when they were children and who is a lesbian. When she disclosed her sexual orientation to her family, their father disowned her. As she is sterile due to steroid abuse, Verger exerts some control over her by promising her a semen sample with which to impregnate her lover, who could then inherit the Verger fortune. At the book's end, Margot and Starling both help Lecter escape during a shootout between Starling and Verger's guards. Margot, at Lecter's advice, stimulates her brother to ejaculate with a rectally inserted cattle prod, and then kills him by ramming his pet moray eel down his throat.

The book's controversial ending has Lecter presenting Starling with the exhumed bones of her father, which he "brings to life" by hypnotizing Starling, allowing her to say goodbye. This forges an odd alliance between Starling and Lecter, culminating in their becoming lovers and escaping to Argentina. At the novel's end, Barney sees them at the Teatro Colón of Buenos Aires.

Also gone from the film are the flashbacks to Lecter's childhood, in which he sees his younger sister, Mischa, eaten by German deserters in 1944. These flashbacks formed the basis for the 2007 film Hannibal Rising (written concurrently with the 2006 novel of the same name) which portrays Lecter as a young man.

Hopkins was asked in an interview on the subject of whether or not he believed the idea of Starling and Lecter heading off into the sunset as lovers (as happens in the book). "Yes, I did. Other people found that preposterous. I suppose there's a moral issue there. I think it would have been a very interesting thing though. I think it would have been very interesting had she gone off, because I suspected that there was that romance, attachment there, that obsession with her. I guessed that a long time ago, at the last phone call to Clarice, at the end of SotL, she said, 'Dr. Lecter, Dr. Lecter ... '."

Other media

Prequels

The film was followed by two films which are prequels based on novels by Thomas Harris (although the novel of Red Dragon isn't itself a prequel as it was written before Hannibal):

In popular culture

In 2014, there was a news story from Italy where a gangster fed his rival alive to pigs. Many media stories compared this to a similar scene in Hannibal.

Five months after the film's release, the renowned South Park episode Scott Tenorman Must Die featured Eric Cartman attempting to train a pony to bite his titular rival Scott Tenorman, directly citing "the deformed guy" from Hannibal for such a scheme.

Notes

  1. As depicted in The Silence of the Lambs (1991).
  2. A reference to the disemboweling of Judas Iscariot and the 1478 execution of Pazzi's ancestors, incidents that Lecter repeatedly mentions to Pazzi over the course of the film.
  3. Oldman was uncredited in the original theatrical version of the film. His name was added to the closing credits in all subsequent releases.

References

  1. ^ "Hannibal". AFI Catalog. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
  2. ^ Minns, Adam (23 February 2000). "UPI floats Bullwinkle, Hannibal". Retrieved 9 June 2024.
  3. "Hannibal (18)". British Board of Film Classification. 1 February 2001. Archived from the original on 5 October 2016. Retrieved 5 October 2016.
  4. ^ "Hannibal (2001)". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 6 March 2009.
  5. "Taste of success". The Independent. London. 20 February 2001. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
  6. Collins, Jim (1992). Film Theory Goes to the Movies. London, England: Routledge. p. 35. ISBN 978-0-415-90576-3. Archived from the original on 20 July 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2020.
  7. ^ Hannibal DVD "Making of feature"
  8. ^ Bernstein, Jill (9 February 2001). "How Hannibal came to be made". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 23 December 2007. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  9. ^ "Preparing to Feast on 'Hannibal'". Los Angeles Times. 2 April 1999. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  10. ^ "Interview with Ridley scott". Total Film. March 2001.
  11. ^ "Bloody 'Hannibal' lacks bite of 'Lambs'". CNN. 8 February 2001. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  12. ^ Morris, Mark (4 February 2001). "Pleased to eat you". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 23 December 2007. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
  13. Flynn, Gillian (11 October 2002). "Rebirth of Cruel". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on 19 August 2007. Retrieved 12 June 2007.
  14. Inside Story The Silence of the Lambs (русские субтитры) on YouTube
  15. ^ Prigge, Steven (2004). Movie Moguls Speak: Interview with top film producers. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-1929-6.
  16. "Britain's stars rise in Europe". The Guardian. 20 October 1999. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 20 October 2021. Mamet's Hannibal script not to Universal's taste
  17. Stax. "Script Review: Hannibal". ScreenwriterUtopia. Archived from the original on 18 October 2006. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
  18. ^ Travers, Peter. "Hannibal—Rolling Stone Review". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on 14 June 2007. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
  19. ^ Fierman, Daniel (17 March 2000). "Killer Instinct". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on 1 April 2007. Retrieved 12 June 2007.
  20. ^ "Lambs 'in doubt' without Foster". BBC. 6 January 2000. Archived from the original on 13 August 2009. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
  21. "Foster passes on Lambs sequel". BBC. 29 December 1999. Archived from the original on 27 February 2014. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
  22. "The Total Film Interview: Jodie Foster". Total Film. Archived from the original on 6 April 2021. Retrieved 7 March 2021.
  23. "Glass: 20 Wild Details Behind The Making Of The Unbreakable Movies". Screen Rant. 15 January 2019.
  24. ^ Hannibal DVD "Ridley Scott commentary"
  25. ^ Rob, Brian (2005). Ridley Scott: Pocket Essential. Pocket Essentials. ISBN 978-1-904048-47-3.
  26. "News articles". IMDB. Archived from the original on 17 March 2004. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  27. "Sir Anthony set for Lambs sequel". BBC. 21 December 1999. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 7 March 2007.
  28. ^ "Movie Interview: Anthony Hopkins". BBC. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
  29. ^ Rose, Charlie (30 January 2001). "60 Minutes: Actors' Take On Ridley Scott". CBS News. Archived from the original on 28 April 2005. Retrieved 8 June 2007.
  30. Llenden, Joseph (June 2003). "You Offered Me What?! Roles Rejected By Great Actors". Total Film. Future plc.
  31. Johnson, Malcolm. "A Heroic Persona" . Hartford Courant. 12 October 2004. Retrieved 22 July 2012.
  32. Helen Keier (26 February 2001). "Interview with Gary Oldman". IGN. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  33. ^ Official Hannibal production notes
  34. ^ Official Hannibal Journal
  35. Rose, Charlie (27 January 2001). "60 Minutes: Ridley Scott". CBS News. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 7 June 2007.
  36. ^ Mitchell, Elvis (9 February 2001). "FILM REVIEW; Whetting That Large Appetite for Second Helpings". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
  37. ^ Clarke, James (2002). Virgin Film: Ridley Scott. Virgin Books. ISBN 0-7535-0731-5.
  38. Coleman, Christopher. "Goodie, Goodie!". TrackSounds. Archived from the original on 14 March 2007. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
  39. "Top 100 movie soundtracks". Classic FM. Retrieved 6 April 2007.
  40. "Hannibal News". Counting Down. 5800. Archived from the original on 17 September 2007. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
  41. Wilson, Mark (6 February 2001). "Lecter's bloody second course has a hollow centre". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 4 February 2009. Retrieved 9 March 2007.
  42. "Hannibal trivia on imdb.com". IMDB. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 31 August 2010.
  43. ^ Sambides Jr., Nick (8 February 2001). "Taking A Bite Out Of Hannibal". CBS News. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 31 August 2010.
  44. ^ Serjeant, Jill (2 February 2001). "Appetites Whet For Hannibal". CBS News. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 31 August 2010.
  45. "The Passions of Julianne Moore". Vanity Fair. March 2001. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  46. "All the Secrets of Hannibal". Entertainment Weekly. No. 581. 9 February 2001.
  47. ""What's cooking?" Hannibal heads up Empire's 'Bloody Valentine' Special". Empire. No. 141. March 2001.
  48. Cathy Dunkley, Dana Harris (20 March 2001). "Who gets Lecter's Lucre?". Variety. Retrieved 9 June 2024.
  49. Hettrick, Scott; Garrett, Diane (2 May 2001). "'Hannibal' vid plans cooking". Variety. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
  50. McCutcheon, David (23 July 2009). "Hannibal Lecter Eats Up". IGN. Archived from the original on 19 May 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
  51. "Hannibal 4K Blu-ray". blu-ray.com. 6 February 2019. Archived from the original on 12 February 2019. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  52. "Hannibal (2001) - 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray Ultra HD Review | High Def Digest". ultrahd.highdefdigest.com. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  53. ^ "Box Office: Hannibal Takes Record-Sized Bite". ABC News. 11 February 2001. Archived from the original on 29 January 2011. Retrieved 8 June 2007.
  54. Susman, Gary (2 March 2004). "Passion ties record with $125 million take records". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
  55. Germain, David (13 February 2001). "'Hannibal' chews up record books". The Associated Press. Lansing State Journal. p. 29. Archived from the original on 1 November 2022. Retrieved 1 November 2022 – via Newspapers.com. Open access icon
  56. "'Reloaded' sets R-rated record". Daily Press. 19 May 2003. p. 1. Archived from the original on 7 November 2022. Retrieved 7 November 2022 – via Newspapers.com. Open access icon
  57. Gray, Brandon (12 February 2001). "Weekend Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 17 September 2023. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  58. "Box Office". IMDB Pro. Archived from the original on 30 August 2014. Retrieved 10 April 2007.
  59. Groves, Don (19 February 2001). "'Hannibal' appeals to all tastes o'seas". Variety. p. 12.
  60. Groves, Don (5 March 2001). "Mel and Hel burp 'Hannibal' in Italy". Variety. p. 10.
  61. "Box-Office data for Hannibal". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 10 April 2007. Retrieved 10 March 2007.
  62. "US Video rentals". IMDB. Archived from the original on 30 August 2014. Retrieved 10 April 2007.
  63. ^ Thomson, David (2001). "The Riddler Has His Day". Sight & Sound. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 9 April 2007.
  64. "Hannibal (2001)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Archived from the original on 9 May 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
  65. "Hannibal Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on 7 January 2018. Retrieved 6 March 2018.
  66. "HANNIBAL (2001) C+". CinemaScore. Archived from the original on 20 December 2018.
  67. Nathan, Ian (15 February 2001). "Hannibal Review". Empire. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
  68. ^ McCarthy, Todd (5 February 2001). "Hannibal Review". Variety. Archived from the original on 20 July 2023. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
  69. Brooks, Xan (16 February 2001). "Hannibal Review". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 23 December 2007. Retrieved 9 April 2007.
  70. Roger Ebert (9 February 2001). "Hannibal". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on 28 September 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
  71. "Hannibal review". Time Out Film Guide. Archived from the original on 28 December 2004. Retrieved 16 April 2007.
  72. Mattram, James; Al Kehoe (2001). "Interview: Dino De Laurentiis". BBC. Archived from the original on 25 September 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2007.
  73. "Interview with Anthony Hopkins". IGN. Archived from the original on 17 September 2007. Retrieved 13 March 2007.
  74. Calder, Rich (29 November 2013). "Mobster left to be eaten alive by pigs". NY Post. Archived from the original on 17 August 2020. Retrieved 21 June 2014.

External links

Thomas Harris's Hannibal Lecter
Novels
Films
Television
Hannibal
(2013–2015)
Episodes
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Characters
Related
Ridley Scott
Feature films
Other work
Family
Related
David Mamet
Plays written
Films written only
Films written
and directed
Books written
TV series created
Family
Steven Zaillian
Films written and directed
Films written
Television series
Categories: