Revision as of 16:31, 11 August 2011 editFreemanSA (talk | contribs)105 edits →Khamis Gaddafi← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:48, 12 August 2011 edit undoReaper Eternal (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Administrators62,576 edits You have been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account is being used only for sock puppetry or meat puppetry. | ||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Khamis Gaddafi == | |||
I have some trouble with a recent edit you made to the biography on ]. Both sides in the Libyan conflict have used propaganda, and have been manipulative of international media, if not outright lying to it. So adding the phrase "it was proven to be false" seems to place Misplaced Pages in the position of choosing one untrustworthy side over the other, and that's something we need to avoid here. Even the Fox News article the phrase was sourced to only refers to "a man Libyan state television said was Muammar al-Qaddafi's youngest son". If the source is unsure, then we can't use it to make a definitive claim one way or another with words like "proven". Thanks!--] (]) 15:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Edit warring== | |||
⚫ | : |
||
Hi FreemansSA. It looks like you're having a dispute with a variety of different users about what content belongs in ]. When that happens, Misplaced Pages requires that editors attempt to work our their differences through discussion, not just through continually reverting each other. In fact, our policy says that any editor who is ]--that is, reverting regularly without consensus--can be blocked from editing. Exactly what qualifies as edit-warring is somewhat subjective, but you're definitely crossing the line. More importantly, in this case, there is a very specific, unbreakable rule, called ]. This rule says that except in very rare circumstances that don't apply here, you cannot undo the changes of another editor more than 3 times in 24 hours (note that this isn't just hitting the "undo" button--it refers to any edit you make that reverts or undoes the work of another editor, even if you do it by hand). If you do, you will definitely be blocked temporarily. You've actually already reverted on that article 4 times in 24 hours, but since you weren't explicitly warned, I'm not going to block you. However, if you do revert again, I will do so. At this point, you have to go to ] and try to gain ] for your desired changes. If you cannot, there are a series of steps called our ] that you can follow; note, though, that decisions are ultimately based on Misplaced Pages policies, like ] and ], not based on our own opinions about what is "true" or "good". ] (]) 00:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | : Objectively is the one who started to revert and has done way more than 3 reversion therefore you should warn him and not me because he is crying. --] (]) 12:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
==] case== | |||
{| align="left" style="background: transparent;" | |||
|| ] | |||
|} | |||
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 18:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
== August 2011 == | |||
{{tmbox | |||
| style = background: #f8eaba; | |||
| image = ] | |||
| text = <big>'''Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet'''</big> | |||
'''''You have been ] indefinitely''''' as a ] that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that multiple accounts are ], ''but'' using them for ] reasons is '''not'''. | |||
If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 18:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock --> | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 18:48, 12 August 2011
Edit warring
Hi FreemansSA. It looks like you're having a dispute with a variety of different users about what content belongs in Khamis Gaddafi. When that happens, Misplaced Pages requires that editors attempt to work our their differences through discussion, not just through continually reverting each other. In fact, our policy says that any editor who is edit warring--that is, reverting regularly without consensus--can be blocked from editing. Exactly what qualifies as edit-warring is somewhat subjective, but you're definitely crossing the line. More importantly, in this case, there is a very specific, unbreakable rule, called WP:3RR. This rule says that except in very rare circumstances that don't apply here, you cannot undo the changes of another editor more than 3 times in 24 hours (note that this isn't just hitting the "undo" button--it refers to any edit you make that reverts or undoes the work of another editor, even if you do it by hand). If you do, you will definitely be blocked temporarily. You've actually already reverted on that article 4 times in 24 hours, but since you weren't explicitly warned, I'm not going to block you. However, if you do revert again, I will do so. At this point, you have to go to Talk:Khamis Gaddafi and try to gain consensus for your desired changes. If you cannot, there are a series of steps called our dispute resolution process that you can follow; note, though, that decisions are ultimately based on Misplaced Pages policies, like WP:NPOV and WP:RS, not based on our own opinions about what is "true" or "good". Qwyrxian (talk) 00:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Objectively is the one who started to revert and has done way more than 3 reversion therefore you should warn him and not me because he is crying. --FreemanSA (talk) 12:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/FreemanSA for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
|