| Revision as of 05:03, 20 March 2006 editSevera (talk | contribs)15,365 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:56, 21 January 2016 edit undoCFCF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,041 edits Outdated | ||
| (45 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''High priority:''' | |||
| * Spend two weeks engaging in circular, POV-prone debates over a single word or in niggling POV witch-hunts whilst ignoring the to-do list, "Progress Report II," and all calls toward productiveness and article-improvement. | |||
| '''Low priority:''' | |||
| * Harmonize (merge) ] lead with new section, so they are the same informative overview of the subject. (with details going into the sub article). | |||
| * Properly source the majority of information under "Forms of abortion" and "Health effects." | |||
| * Source and write a sub-section on forced abortion for "Social issues." | |||
| * Discuss creation of "Historical perspectives" topic under "Abortion debate." | |||
| * Rework the Incidence table (see thread "Clarify the percentages?" in Archive 17 of Talk:Abortion). | |||
| * Add public opinion data from more diverse countries. | |||
| * Pictures. <s>In particular, an image of pro-choice demonstrators for "Abortion debate."</s> | |||