Revision as of 23:46, 20 March 2006 editAvg (talk | contribs)3,233 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:31, 22 December 2024 edit undoRemsense (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Template editors60,951 editsm Reverted 2 edits by 68.131.64.76 (talk) to last revision by 2A02:678:481:2100:5C8:4881:44EE:6BFTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} | |||
{{Talk header}} | |||
{{British English Oxford spelling}} | |||
{{FailedGA|18:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)|topic=Places|page=1}} | |||
{{On this day|date1=2005-03-25|oldid1=16334952|date2=2006-03-25|oldid2=43921516|date3=2007-03-25|oldid3=117779155|date4=2008-03-25|oldid4=200747314|date5=2009-03-25|oldid5=279617618|date6=2010-03-25|oldid6=351980099|date7=2011-03-25|oldid7=420579561|date8=2012-03-25|oldid8=483892041|date9=2013-03-25|oldid9=546685970|date10=2015-03-25|oldid10=653119985|date11=2016-03-25|oldid11=711840971|date12=2017-03-25|oldid12=772089390}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Greece |importance=Top |topic=history |byzantine-task-force=yes }} | |||
{{WikiProject Countries}} | {{WikiProject Countries}} | ||
}} | |||
{{FAOL|Arabic|ar:يونان}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 125K | |||
|counter = 17 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 3 | |||
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 | |||
|algo = old(90d) | |||
|archive = Talk:Greece/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|b|long}} | |||
{{Backwards copy|title=Historical Mechanisms: An Experimental Approach to Applying Scientific Theories to the Study of History|author=Andreas D. Boldt|url=https://books.google.gr/books?id=NxddDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT162&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Greece%3A%20Greatness&f=false|org=]|year=2017|comments=See ] for details.}} | |||
{{unsourced}} | |||
{{section sizes}} | |||
{{Quote box | |||
|align=center | |||
|quote=Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts? | |||
|source=] | |||
|}} | |||
== Religion == | |||
{| class="infobox" width="270px" | |||
|- | |||
!align="center" colspan="2"|]<br/>] | |||
---- | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
| | |||
|}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | |||
The part in the infobox talking about religion is largely outdated with more recen studies depicting a different attitude towards religion. | |||
== Length of article == | |||
https://www.kathimerini.gr/society/562979893/dimoskopisi-dianeosis-statheri-axia-i-thriskeia-kai-nea-agonia-gia-to-klima/ | |||
I think this article is getting too long -- especially the History section. The information there should, I think, be in the more specific sub-articles, e.g. ] ''etc.'' What do others think? --] 17:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
This study says that 18.9% of the population doesnt believe in religion. | |||
:Absolutely. I suggest moving a lot of the detailed material here into the appropriate sub-articles per ]. ] 17:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Further, ] gives us a guide as to what sections should and should not be present. ] 17:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
While in this study "The U.S. government estimates the total population at 10.5 million (midyear 2022). According to research polls, 81 to 90 percent of the population identifies as Greek Orthodox, 4 to 15 percent as atheist, and 2 percent as Muslim." | |||
https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/greece/ ] (]) 14:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
Well, all these sections seem to loose themselves under a variety of rabmling entries. All seems too wooly. Key issues should include the role of certain sections of the '''Greek media''' in running the country (a seemingly tabboo subject in Greece); '''corruption''' (Greece is rated as one of the most corrupt in the west); '''demography''' (Greece has one of the lowest population growth rates in the world - occasionally dropping), the impact of the '''Diaspora'''; the country's '''defence budget''' (4.5% of GDP!); the country's positive '''impact''' in southeast Europe (top investor and hosting foreign workforce)... kai ta loipa, kai ta loipa...] 17:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Establishment == | |||
:Please see ]. ] 17:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Why doesn't Greece on Misplaced Pages have establishment dates before 1830? In other countries you have establishment dates much earlier than the modern establishment of the state, such as Turkey, Egypt, Bulgaria, etc. | |||
==Lack of references== | |||
There are many examples of the establishment of a Greek state in the past such as the Union of Corinth, the Union of Deilos, the Macedonian empire, and the later Byzantine empire. | |||
Well, we don;t need any original research to see the corruption and nationalism of Greeks. Just look at the way the pages are written: no proper references, classic nationalistic POV, refusal to accept the correct official data.... Basically, the WHOLE PAGE IS A DISGRACE{{unsigned|87.202.17.70}} | |||
There is even a Misplaced Pages page that refers to it under the title "Greek Empire" | |||
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Greek_Empire ] (]) 20:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
You really have a big problem with Greeks... Honestly I can't understand why! Where ru from? Let me guess somewhere in the Balkans? You know what mate? Just get over it and accept the fact that with the way and language that you are trying to put forward your arguments will never be heard by anyone serious...{{unsigned|87.74.92.255}} | |||
: That's been repeatedly debated before, most recently at ] and earlier at ]. The short answer is: there was never any state in history before 1830 that was called Greece, had any kind of historical continuity with the present-day state, or was even just roughly coextensive geographically with it. ] ] 09:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Demographics of Greece must include Greeks == | |||
::I agree that obviously these ancient states or entities couldn't really be added here as early stages of the modern Hellenic Republic, since, despite the fact they had a perception of "Greece", they did not exactly form one unified Greek state that developed into modern Greece. Same thing for ], where the establisment section doesn't include Rome. On the other hand, I used to think that this section was based primarily on continuity; while countries like ], the ], ] etc. have a direct and unborken continuity with their previous empires, that's not the case with some other countries. One example is ], where the section starts from the 4th millenium BC; can we actually claim that the modern Arab Republic of Egypt is a continuation of the ancient Egyptian kingdoms, at least in any meaningful way? I guess what counts here as "continuity" is the very name "Egypt" (?). But again, ancient Egypt ceased to exist as a state when it fell to the Romans in 31 BC (which is not mentioned there), well before the territory got conquered by the Arabs. Generally, these infoboxes can be very tricky. ] (]) 10:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Albania, for example, fell into the hands of the Ottomans. Nevertheless, the kingdom of Arbanon is mentioned. The same is happening with Bulgaria. I think the same should be happening with Greece since there were many cases of Greek empires and alliances in the Greek peninsula such as the Corinthian league and the Macedonian empire. :) ] (]) 10:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::: The Albania article is a pretty bad example to follow, to my mind (Please don't fall into the trap of assuming that just because some other article does something a certain way, we should do it the same way in another – there are doubtless a lot of articles where things have gone wrong.) For Bulgaria (as for Egypt, Poland and a couple others), I've gone on record on an earlier occasion saying that I can at least marginally see a case for including them, given that they were clearly historical states that shared at least the name and the approximate territory, if not temporal continuity, with the present ones. Albania doesn't have that: there were historical states in what is now Albania, and inhabited/ruled by Albanians, but there was never a historical state of "Albania". Greece doesn't have it either. Just because there were certain states that were run by Greeks, or situated in what is now Greece, doesn't make these states "Greece". (Incidentally, the ] page you linked to is an utter mess and shouldn't exist.) ] ] 11:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I see your point regarding the other Balkan countries. I would like to kindly mention, however, that I still don't think it would be appropriate for anciet states or entities (like alliances etc.) to be used in the establishment section of the infobox of the modern Hellenic republic for the reasons that were given above. ] (]) 11:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::The Corinthian League was also called the Hellenic league. It was founded by Philip of Macedonia and was the predecessor of the Macedonian empire. Macedoniam empire also is considered as an example of Greek unification. Also the Byzantine empire was occasionally referred to by others as the Greeks. | |||
:::::Georgia (the country) has a reference to the ancient kingdoms of Iberia and Colchis even though it was not a unified state. | |||
:::::<nowiki>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/League_of_Corinth</nowiki> ] (]) 11:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::You are right for pointing this out; that is yet another example of bad usage of the establishment section in a country infobox. ] (]) 13:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I would also like to point out that the various polities that you mentioned above are actually not ignored in the article, but are instead mentioned in the history section, which is the right place for all of them to be properly discussed. Among the other reasons given above, the sheer complexity of the various types of ancient Greek polities and other entities is impossible to be accurately represented in the overly simplistic infobox. ] (]) 14:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::] (]) 15:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Greece#c-Ypoferomai-20240909151100-Piccco-20240909142300 ] (]) 15:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Sorry something happened with wikipedia and I can't send a message. | |||
:::::::I would also to say. | |||
:::::::The Corinthian league was also called the Greek league and was a federation, not just an alliance. It had a way of organization just like the Mongolian Xiongnu confederation. | |||
:::::::If you look at the wikipedia page for Mongolia it mentions this state as an earlier form of establishment of Mongolia. | |||
:::::::Also, the Macedonian empire is an example of the unification of the Greeks as it is actually stated on the page of history. ] (]) 15:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::I don't exactly disagree, but this is a bit too simplistic and not fitting for this infobox. I understand that you are an inexperienced user, so this might make sense to you, especially after seeing all these terribly wrong infoboxes in other countries. I'm not sure, but I believe Mongolia might be another example of bad infobox; it can't really be used for comparison. ] (]) 10:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Are you an experienced user? Then what has Misplaced Pages really come to? The official name of Greece is not "Greece" it is the Hellenic Republic or Hellas. For the sake of combating misinformation it can be mentioned that all previous polities of Greece including the Corinthian league ,Athens, Sparta, the Macedonian Empire callled themselves Hellenes. ] (]) 21:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Cities == | |||
This Demographics in the Greece article are Fabricated, some person/s insist on removing ethnic greeks from the Demographics of Greece. Here is what the article states at present | |||
The list of Greek cities shows Piraeus, which, however, as mentioned in the relevant article, belongs to the urban area of Athens. So I think that either Piraeus should be removed from the list of cities in the article, or that the other cities - municipalities that belong to Athens should be added. ] (]) 13:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
'''Estimates regarding the ethnic makeup of Greece vary widely; immigrants who are not ethnic Greeks make up somewhere between 2% and 8.5% of the country's residents. Immigrants who are ethnic Greeks may make up about 2% of the population. The main minorites include Turks, Macedonian Slavs, Pomaks, and various Roma groups. A number of religious minorities exist, including the Muslim minority in western Thrace, which makes up about a third of that region's population.''' | |||
== Changes in the text == | |||
Firstly the estimates regarding the ethnic makeup of Greece do '''NOT''' vary widley at all, all contemporary encyclopedias and statistics show a similar result, according to the CIA World Factbook 2006 Greece's demographics are Greek 98%, other 2% . | |||
Yesterday i made a change there that it was saying that Greece is considered the birthplace of western civilization. I wrote that Greece is the birthplace of western civilization. Also at the western civilization you have a wrong link that doesnt lead to the page of western civilization but leads to the western culture instead so i put the correct link. You changed again these things that i wrote. Why you dont let other members to edit the pages?Everyone can edit in wikipedia. And the changes that i made are both correct. Put again the changes that i made. Also in the paragraph in the economy page that you write the numbers of the gdp and gdp per capita are still the old ones while at the box in the first page are the new ones. You have to change them in the paragraph. ] (]) 03:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
'''immigrants who are not ethnic Greeks make up somewhere between 2% and 8.5% of the country's residents''' | |||
: Misplaced Pages content is determined by ] and ], which you don't seem to understand. If others disagree with changes you've made, you need to make a case for your changes on the article talk pages and get a consensus; see ]. <b>] ]</b> 14:31, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I told you that the western civilization has a wrong link on it! It leads to a wrong page you can just see it when you click it! Its not difficult! Also if you go to the economy page in the first paragraph you havent changed the numbers of gdp with the new ones like you did on the box in the introduction page! Why you just cant check them to see it?? You answer me without even check them! ] (]) 15:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Secondly immigrants who are not ethnic Greeks '''DO NOT''' make up somewhere between 2% and 8.5% of the country's residents, if the individual who quoted this actually bothered to read the statistics properly, they would've seen that the CIA World Factbook on Greece states that the Net migration rate is 2.34 migrant(s) PER 1,000 population, not 2% - 8% of the countires population. | |||
:::So to be clear you think ] or ] don't explain things properly or you think the link should simply link ] over the parent article that explains what the term means? You are aware that there is no section discussing Greece in the history article.<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>🍁 00:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
] 06:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
SO NOW THERE ARE NO NON-GREEK IMMIGRANTS IN GREECE? THIS IS THE USUAL GREEK RACIST AND NATIONALISTIC CRAP. THERE ARE 8% NON-GREEK IMMIGRANTS IN GREECE, AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NET MIGRATION RATES. I SUGGEST YOU PUT THE PAGE BACK AS IT WAS.<small>—''The preceding ] comment was added by'' ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned--> | |||
:Please adopt a much more ] here at Misplaced Pages. ] 03:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
A civil tone is not appropriate for liars and cheats. There are NOT, REPEAT NOT, 98% Greeks in Greece, so just stop this crap. The American datasource is not reliable and you should use Greek state data. Of course, we all know the real reason Greeks here want to use the CIA Factbook -- because it suits their nationalistic POV.<small>—''The preceding ] comment was added by'' ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned--> | |||
:If you would like to contribute to Misplaced Pages, being ] is mandatory. In the future, refrain from name-calling and accusations. ] 15:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
User Jkelly is incapable of behaving responsibly and has removed the correct edit of another user. THe LIES AND FALSEHOODS being pished through on the Greek pages are a disgrace, and show that Greeks are not fit to be members of the European Union. THe correct data from the 2001 Census and official reports have been put on these pages by me and others time and again, and Greek nationalists have decided to remove them. So, once again, THERE ARE NOT 98% GREEKS IN GREECE SO STOP THE CRAP. I have tired of putting links to official reports when idiots here remove them. Just grow up and learn how to make correct arguments, instead of the childish GREEKS ARE WONDERFUL AND CLEVER mentality.<small>—''The preceding ] comment was added by'' ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned--> | |||
How about we focus on real issues like the ongoing Turkish genocide of millions of Kurds and end the childish rant? If Greece is so bad then why do 10's of millions of tourists go there to enjoy themselves each year? --] 06:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Bogus tourism statistic== | |||
The article "In particular during 2005, Greece was the top tourist destination amongst Americans." I removed this statement, which is patently false. I couldn't find 2005 statistics, but show Greece in 27th place for 2003, and 23rd place using the max of the last 10 years' tourism. It seems unlikely that in two years Greece increased its tourism enough to match Italy (#5, 460% more tourists), the UK (#3, 1010%) or Mexico (#1, 5900%). --] 00:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: it's obviously bogus. most of the english speaking tourists are british. maybe someone can't tell the difference. --] 03:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Alphabet == | |||
The development of the Greek alphabet from the Phoeniciian one is acknowledged by the Greek government , Encyclopedia Britannica , ] 15:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
: According to Misplaced Pages, ], the Greek alphabet is the first true alphabet in the sense that it includes vowels and consonants. In this way the Greeks adopted and modified symbols of the Phoenician script and not an ]. I would prefer a citation from an authority in lingustics and not just the government or Britannica, but not being an expert in the field, I cannot provide any. ] 16:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
::It's really rather simple: The term "alphabet" is used in two different senses. The ''traditional'' and ''most widely accepted'' sense of the term "alphabet" is that which includes the Phoenician script, as well as all the other modern Semitic scripts (everybody talks of the Hebrew alphabet, the Arabic alphabet etc.) Used in that sense, the Greeks very very clearly adopted and modified the Phoenician alphabet. No doubt at all. - There is a second, more technical and narrower sense of the term "alphabet", used by some linguists in this specialized field, among them the authors of an eminent recent reference work (Daniels et al., ''The World's Writing Systems''). These authors contrast "alphabets in the narrow sense" with two other classes of writing systems, called "abjads" and "abugidas". Used in this sense, the Phoenician script is not an alphabet, and the Greek one is the first. Note that this doesn't imply that the "true alphabets" are in any way more advanced or better than the other two classes. ] ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> (faking my own signature because the server keeps throwing me out.) | |||
::The articles Greek alphabet and History of the alphabet have references. Babiniotis in Συνοπτική ιστορία της Ελληνικής γλώσσας talks about the "Φοινικική γραφή" (p. 76) and gives more details on pp. 80-82: Έτσι οι Έλληνες τροποποίησαν, συμπλήρωσαν και, κυρίως, μετέτρεψαν το φοινικικό αλφάβητο σε φωνολογικό, πράγμα που αποτελεί και την πιό σημαντική καινοτομία σε παγκόσμια κλίμακα. ] 18:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC), information by ] | |||
::If you want more Greek references, there's a chapter by A. Kontogiannis, in: M. Kopidakis (ed.), ''Ιστορία της ελληνικής γλώσσας,'' Athens 1999, ISBN 960-201-122-X. ] <small><sup>]|]</sup></small> 19:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Lukas, synoptically, what is the evidence a) Greek alphabet evolved from Phoenician and not Linear A, Linear B, or Cypriot which predate Phoenician, and have clear correlations with the Greek alphabet, and b) what is the evidence Phoenician did not evolve from the previous. | |||
::Look at the shapes of the letters,their names, and their order in the alphabet, they are very similar between Greek and Phenician. That's why Phenician was included in the table.] was not Greek anyway. ] is a syllabic script with completely different shapes. The ] evolved from Egyptian ]. Linear B seems to be unrelated to Egyptian writing. A table of corrspondence between Hieroglyphs and Hebrew is found at ]] 16:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Forgive me, but not only are the shapes not "completely different" between Greek and Linear B, but there is clear correlation. You can view all mentioned scripts at www.ancientscripts.com. Linear B script is found in mainland Greece and has symbols that easily correlate, and can be considered predecessors to tau, alpha, digammo(F), phi, theta, omicron, psi, delta, upsilon, pi, xi, rho, etc. Furthermore, Linear B is clearly a descendant of Linear A, and your mention that Linear A is not Greek is false, as of this moment, the question is inconclusive & Linear A is undeciphered. I agree that there are clearer correlations between Phoenician and Greek, than Greek and Linear B, however I have yet to see evidence both Phoenician and Greek did not develop from Linear B. The previously mentioned site contests Phoenician derived from proto-Sinaitic (which derived from hieroglyphic), though, average date ranges for Linear B and proto-Sinaitic are 1350 BC and 1500 BC, respectively. Not so far apart. | |||
According to same site, I am expected to believe that the Phoenician "F" symbol ("he") derived from a stick figure and not from the symbol third to bottom in the "e" column, of the Linear B script on ancientscripts.com. Common sense dictates this version to be more likely; "he" is not the only example. Observe "aleph", "daleth", "res" as the most striking examples of Phoenician characters with far closer Linear B counterparts than the proposed proto-Sinaitic ones. | |||
The discrepency in position, or sound can find an explanation in the Greek "dark ages". It is not unlikely, Greeks of the archaic period rediscovered the Mycenean Linear B symbols altering, and assigning different phonetics to them, since the Linear B writing system came out of use during the dark ages. I sincerely hope there is no "agenda" in interpreting the above information, and I am looking for an expert to analyze this argument, before I change related articles. | |||
I would also like the above information to be disputed with conclusive evidence and references, and the questions I put forth in the previous post to be answered adequately. a) what is the evidence Greek alphabet derived from Phoenician not Linear A, Linear B, or ancient Cypriot... b) what is the evidence both Greek and Phoenician did not evolve from Linear B. And I would add, that the average date range of Linear A is 1600 BC (older than proto-Sinaitic). I am not able to find a clear representation of the Linear A symbols to make a comparison, though I suspect a valid question to be, did Phoenician derive from Linear A. I am skeptical that Greek evolved from a foreign script when traces of Linear B existed in the mainland, and correlations exist. Phoenician influence extended via trade, but the Linear A writing Minoans, who heavily influenced Mycenean Greece, traded centuries before the Phoenicians. Minoan contacts may have served as a transfer point for Linear B to North Africa. Perhaps the issue is ambiguous, whatever the Greek government point of view may be. I hope I've been concise and clear in my argument.{{unsigned|128.61.42.109}} | |||
Misplaced Pages is not the place for speculation and open-ended discussion. WP reports the mainstream positions (and ''prominent'' minority positions) of serious researchers. I am not aware of a single serious scholar who considers Linear B and the Greek alphabet to be related, or who denies that the Greek alphabet derives from the Phoenician. Are you? (And I don't mean newspaper articles or popular magazines like Davlos.) --] 14:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
==History section is huge (τεράστιο)== | |||
Country entries should reflect a country's political dynamics, socio-economic factors, defence and security issues and foreign relations. Also of interest are media issues.] 13:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
:But, all of that could be very well adressed exitensively in sub-articles such as History of Greece, History of Modern Greece etc. Only a summary of these sub-articles should be included in this main article. --] 21:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Relevent material at ] and ]. ] 21:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
== FYROM name == | |||
Why the internationally recognised name of Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is changed to Republic of Macedonia? This dispute is going on for 15 years and it has not been resolved. Until it IS resolved, everyone should stick with UN, EU and NATO adopted name for the country. This is as NPOV as it can get. --] 22:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Official Country Names == | |||
Surprisingly, the Official Country Names are not observed in wikipedia articles. For example, the Official websites of EU, UN and NATO are shown bellow: | |||
:<h4>Official EU website</h4> | |||
: | |||
:<h4>Official UN website</h4> | |||
: | |||
:<h4>Official NATO website</h4> | |||
: | |||
It would be useful if those editors who would prefer to use other names like, ''Republic of Macedonia'', or ''Macedonia'' could also provide their sources. Until then, let's stick to the above Official Country Name. ] <small>]</small> 09:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
*http://www.vlada.mk/english/index_en.htm | |||
*http://www.president.gov.mk/index_e.asp | |||
However, this discussion is out of place here, it belongs to ] ] 16:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Well done Andreas, you reference two links from FYROMian government! Of course they want to be called Republic of Macedonia! This is the FYROMian POV. And the discussion is not out of place, as long as there are people who keep changing the name FYROM to Republic of Macedonia on this page. Once again, the NPOV is FYROM. --] 18:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
A person or place may have one or more ]. In formal documentation though, the Official Name should be indicated. Country Names should not reflect POV of editors or administrators. It seems reasonable to use in wikipedia articles the Official registered name in EU, UN, or NATO. Unless this is a ] situation. | |||
I've posted it here because even Misplaced Pages administrators get confused in this article and write for the boundaries to the north of ] as instead of the "''Official country Name | |||
] | |||
Shown enlarged above ] <small>]</small> 11:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Your definition of ''official'' is by itself POV, the name given by the government is as official as that by UN etc. ] 14:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
::FYROM is the name used by this country to register into UN and to apply for membership into EU and NATO, as shown in the ''Official websites'' above. Hence, this country appears in the respective country-member lists under "FYROM". It is customary for countries to apply for membership to these organizations using their ''official name'' by which other country-members address to them. Should the official name change as for example in the case of Zaire (Zaire, its name was changed on 17 May 1997 to the Democratic Republic of the Congo) they should apply to rename and the name on the lists should change accordingly. This, I trust, is the ''General Practice'', it's not a POV. ] <small>]</small> 16:21, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Every country of the world, apart from GREECE, refers to the country as Macedonia or Republic of Macedonia. As Greece has blocked the recognition of that name in the UN, effectively there is no international name for the Republic of Macedonia. This is NOT the same as being the official name: essentially, Greece has managed to bring its own fucked-up mentality to the rest of the Balkans . So cut the crap with "official names". And while we're at it, why can't Greeks accept official data from the Greek state? This page, and all the other Greek pages, are full of crap invented by Greeks, instead of respectable scholarship and official state data... You people make me puke. {{Unsigned|87.202.109.36}} | |||
::Dear anon, your arguments above are perfectly reasonable and constructive until the last three sentences, which besides contributing nothing to the discussion, tend to undermine your own credibility. If your goal is to improve this encyclopedia by ensuring that the (Slav) Macedonian positions are well-represented, you would do well to avoid such intemperate language. --] 15:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:My dear troll, I'd like to thank you for the entertainment you offer to us. I'm an optimist. I do believe that some time in the far future, you will be able to engage in a civilised conversation. --] 23:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Back to the substantive issue here, clearly Greece has blocked the use of the name "Republic of Macedonia" in those international forums where it has some diplomatic influence. Equally clearly, the state itself uses "Republic of Macedonia" as its official name. Some other countries (e.g. the U.S.) also use "Republic of Macedonia". The situation is similar to the "Republic of China", which in most international organizations (if it is accepted at all) is called "Chinese Taipei" because of the objections of the P.R.C., but in Misplaced Pages keeps its preferred name for itself, the "Republic of China". --] 15:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Macrakis, there is no "clearly" in this case, so don't use this kind of words to influence others. If there is something "clear", this is that the name FYROM is a temporary name accepted by BOTH parts, until the naming dispute is resolved. The name Republic of Macedonia is the name the state uses for itself INTERNALLY. FYROM is not Greek POV, it's NPOV. Greeks call this state "Skopje" as you very well know. Have you seen anyone here referring to FYROM as Skopje? Although that's how we refer to it in everyday talk. I would say it's bad form to try finding similarities with other non-relevant cases just because the outcome suits you. --] 18:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Greeks do not use 'Skopje', they use 'ta Skopia' (although they use same name as for the city, like Luxembourg). Greeks also say 'Gallia" for France etc. Germany is ], ], ], ], and see the ]. See also ] ] 19:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes of course you are right, I have just translated "Skopia" to English, for example FYROMians don't use "Macedonia" in everyday speech, they use "Makedonija". But I think we're deviating a bit. The point is that Macrakis repeatedly tries to persuade the readers that it's the Greeks who insist on the name FYROM, while the Greeks have never accepted or used internally any name containing the word "Macedonia" inside. I'm trying to show that FYROM is a compromise, not a name imposed by Greece. --] 19:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
I have merely posted the sites of EU, UN and NATO on which FYROM is indicated. The unsigned (87.202.109.36 was posted from Athens ) insolent response to the above sites is probably suggesting to discard these sites as utterly unreliable and take it's saying for granted. Terribly sorry, not interested in propaganda. ] <small>]</small> 20:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:This very discussion (the naming of FYROM) has been repeated over and over again in ]. Is it really necessary to have the same thing here? It certainly does not help improve the ] article, and I'm inclined to think that it would be more suitable for a mailing list rather than Misplaced Pages... To all concerned please think over if having this conversation here is any good at all... --] 21:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: Having on the article about Greece in a very prominent position the FYROMian POV is very offensive. Certainly you can't expect something like that to stay as it is. This will be an eternal revert war until logic prevails. --] 23:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:31, 22 December 2024
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Greece article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Greece was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 3, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on 12 dates. March 25, 2005, March 25, 2006, March 25, 2007, March 25, 2008, March 25, 2009, March 25, 2010, March 25, 2011, March 25, 2012, March 25, 2013, March 25, 2015, March 25, 2016, and March 25, 2017 |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Misplaced Pages rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Religion
The part in the infobox talking about religion is largely outdated with more recen studies depicting a different attitude towards religion.
This study says that 18.9% of the population doesnt believe in religion.
While in this study "The U.S. government estimates the total population at 10.5 million (midyear 2022). According to research polls, 81 to 90 percent of the population identifies as Greek Orthodox, 4 to 15 percent as atheist, and 2 percent as Muslim."
https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/greece/ Takis S1 (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Establishment
Why doesn't Greece on Misplaced Pages have establishment dates before 1830? In other countries you have establishment dates much earlier than the modern establishment of the state, such as Turkey, Egypt, Bulgaria, etc. There are many examples of the establishment of a Greek state in the past such as the Union of Corinth, the Union of Deilos, the Macedonian empire, and the later Byzantine empire. There is even a Misplaced Pages page that refers to it under the title "Greek Empire"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Greek_Empire Ypoferomai (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's been repeatedly debated before, most recently at Talk:Greece/Archive_17#Why arent ancient/medieval Greek Kingdoms like the Macedonian Empire, Byzantine Empire, Myceneans, Minoans, Cycladics, Greek City States and so on included in the „Establishment“ part of the info box? and earlier at Talk:Greece/Archive_16#Inclusion of the League of Corinth in the infobox. The short answer is: there was never any state in history before 1830 that was called Greece, had any kind of historical continuity with the present-day state, or was even just roughly coextensive geographically with it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that obviously these ancient states or entities couldn't really be added here as early stages of the modern Hellenic Republic, since, despite the fact they had a perception of "Greece", they did not exactly form one unified Greek state that developed into modern Greece. Same thing for Italy, where the establisment section doesn't include Rome. On the other hand, I used to think that this section was based primarily on continuity; while countries like France, the UK, Turkey etc. have a direct and unborken continuity with their previous empires, that's not the case with some other countries. One example is Egypt, where the section starts from the 4th millenium BC; can we actually claim that the modern Arab Republic of Egypt is a continuation of the ancient Egyptian kingdoms, at least in any meaningful way? I guess what counts here as "continuity" is the very name "Egypt" (?). But again, ancient Egypt ceased to exist as a state when it fell to the Romans in 31 BC (which is not mentioned there), well before the territory got conquered by the Arabs. Generally, these infoboxes can be very tricky. Piccco (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Albania, for example, fell into the hands of the Ottomans. Nevertheless, the kingdom of Arbanon is mentioned. The same is happening with Bulgaria. I think the same should be happening with Greece since there were many cases of Greek empires and alliances in the Greek peninsula such as the Corinthian league and the Macedonian empire. :) Ypoferomai (talk) 10:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Albania article is a pretty bad example to follow, to my mind (Please don't fall into the trap of assuming that just because some other article does something a certain way, we should do it the same way in another – there are doubtless a lot of articles where things have gone wrong.) For Bulgaria (as for Egypt, Poland and a couple others), I've gone on record on an earlier occasion saying that I can at least marginally see a case for including them, given that they were clearly historical states that shared at least the name and the approximate territory, if not temporal continuity, with the present ones. Albania doesn't have that: there were historical states in what is now Albania, and inhabited/ruled by Albanians, but there was never a historical state of "Albania". Greece doesn't have it either. Just because there were certain states that were run by Greeks, or situated in what is now Greece, doesn't make these states "Greece". (Incidentally, the Greek Empire page you linked to is an utter mess and shouldn't exist.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I see your point regarding the other Balkan countries. I would like to kindly mention, however, that I still don't think it would be appropriate for anciet states or entities (like alliances etc.) to be used in the establishment section of the infobox of the modern Hellenic republic for the reasons that were given above. Piccco (talk) 11:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Corinthian League was also called the Hellenic league. It was founded by Philip of Macedonia and was the predecessor of the Macedonian empire. Macedoniam empire also is considered as an example of Greek unification. Also the Byzantine empire was occasionally referred to by others as the Greeks.
- Georgia (the country) has a reference to the ancient kingdoms of Iberia and Colchis even though it was not a unified state.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/League_of_Corinth Ypoferomai (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are right for pointing this out; that is yet another example of bad usage of the establishment section in a country infobox. Piccco (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would also like to point out that the various polities that you mentioned above are actually not ignored in the article, but are instead mentioned in the history section, which is the right place for all of them to be properly discussed. Among the other reasons given above, the sheer complexity of the various types of ancient Greek polities and other entities is impossible to be accurately represented in the overly simplistic infobox. Piccco (talk) 14:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ypoferomai (talk) 15:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Greece#c-Ypoferomai-20240909151100-Piccco-20240909142300 Ypoferomai (talk) 15:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry something happened with wikipedia and I can't send a message.
- I would also to say.
- The Corinthian league was also called the Greek league and was a federation, not just an alliance. It had a way of organization just like the Mongolian Xiongnu confederation.
- If you look at the wikipedia page for Mongolia it mentions this state as an earlier form of establishment of Mongolia.
- Also, the Macedonian empire is an example of the unification of the Greeks as it is actually stated on the page of history. Ypoferomai (talk) 15:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't exactly disagree, but this is a bit too simplistic and not fitting for this infobox. I understand that you are an inexperienced user, so this might make sense to you, especially after seeing all these terribly wrong infoboxes in other countries. I'm not sure, but I believe Mongolia might be another example of bad infobox; it can't really be used for comparison. Piccco (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Are you an experienced user? Then what has Misplaced Pages really come to? The official name of Greece is not "Greece" it is the Hellenic Republic or Hellas. For the sake of combating misinformation it can be mentioned that all previous polities of Greece including the Corinthian league ,Athens, Sparta, the Macedonian Empire callled themselves Hellenes. 2A02:678:481:2100:5C8:4881:44EE:6BF (talk) 21:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't exactly disagree, but this is a bit too simplistic and not fitting for this infobox. I understand that you are an inexperienced user, so this might make sense to you, especially after seeing all these terribly wrong infoboxes in other countries. I'm not sure, but I believe Mongolia might be another example of bad infobox; it can't really be used for comparison. Piccco (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Albania, for example, fell into the hands of the Ottomans. Nevertheless, the kingdom of Arbanon is mentioned. The same is happening with Bulgaria. I think the same should be happening with Greece since there were many cases of Greek empires and alliances in the Greek peninsula such as the Corinthian league and the Macedonian empire. :) Ypoferomai (talk) 10:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that obviously these ancient states or entities couldn't really be added here as early stages of the modern Hellenic Republic, since, despite the fact they had a perception of "Greece", they did not exactly form one unified Greek state that developed into modern Greece. Same thing for Italy, where the establisment section doesn't include Rome. On the other hand, I used to think that this section was based primarily on continuity; while countries like France, the UK, Turkey etc. have a direct and unborken continuity with their previous empires, that's not the case with some other countries. One example is Egypt, where the section starts from the 4th millenium BC; can we actually claim that the modern Arab Republic of Egypt is a continuation of the ancient Egyptian kingdoms, at least in any meaningful way? I guess what counts here as "continuity" is the very name "Egypt" (?). But again, ancient Egypt ceased to exist as a state when it fell to the Romans in 31 BC (which is not mentioned there), well before the territory got conquered by the Arabs. Generally, these infoboxes can be very tricky. Piccco (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Cities
The list of Greek cities shows Piraeus, which, however, as mentioned in the relevant article, belongs to the urban area of Athens. So I think that either Piraeus should be removed from the list of cities in the article, or that the other cities - municipalities that belong to Athens should be added. Νίκος Αστέρης (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Changes in the text
Yesterday i made a change there that it was saying that Greece is considered the birthplace of western civilization. I wrote that Greece is the birthplace of western civilization. Also at the western civilization you have a wrong link that doesnt lead to the page of western civilization but leads to the western culture instead so i put the correct link. You changed again these things that i wrote. Why you dont let other members to edit the pages?Everyone can edit in wikipedia. And the changes that i made are both correct. Put again the changes that i made. Also in the paragraph in the economy page that you write the numbers of the gdp and gdp per capita are still the old ones while at the box in the first page are the new ones. You have to change them in the paragraph. Alikakii (talk) 03:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages content is determined by reliable sources and consensus, which you don't seem to understand. If others disagree with changes you've made, you need to make a case for your changes on the article talk pages and get a consensus; see WP:BRD. OhNoitsJamie 14:31, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- I told you that the western civilization has a wrong link on it! It leads to a wrong page you can just see it when you click it! Its not difficult! Also if you go to the economy page in the first paragraph you havent changed the numbers of gdp with the new ones like you did on the box in the introduction page! Why you just cant check them to see it?? You answer me without even check them! Alikakii (talk) 15:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- So to be clear you think Western civilization or Western culture don't explain things properly or you think the link should simply link History of Western civilization over the parent article that explains what the term means? You are aware that there is no section discussing Greece in the history article.Moxy🍁 00:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- I told you that the western civilization has a wrong link on it! It leads to a wrong page you can just see it when you click it! Its not difficult! Also if you go to the economy page in the first paragraph you havent changed the numbers of gdp with the new ones like you did on the box in the introduction page! Why you just cant check them to see it?? You answer me without even check them! Alikakii (talk) 15:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use Oxford spelling
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Former good article nominees
- Selected anniversaries (March 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2011)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2012)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2013)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2015)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2016)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2017)
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Geography
- B-Class vital articles in Geography
- B-Class Greek articles
- Top-importance Greek articles
- Byzantine world task force articles
- WikiProject Greece history articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles