Misplaced Pages

Talk:Roger Williams National Memorial: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:30, 5 September 2011 editEbyabe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers195,132 editsm high importance nrhp, nmem, replaced: {{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=stub}} → {{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=stub|importance=high}} using AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:13, 11 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,268 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=stub|importance=high}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Protected areas|class=Stub|auto=Inherit|importance=}} {{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Protected areas|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=mid |RI=yes |RI-importance=high }}
}}


==Untitled== == Images ==
{{reply to|Kzirkel|Jllm06| Magnolia677|XRay|Commonists}} Beginning a discussion here to gain consensus around images. I believe ], which {{reply to|Beyond My Ken}} has repeatedly inserted into the article, is of significantly lower quality than an ] by {{reply to|Kzirkel}}. Thoughts? ] (]) 01:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
loser | class= | importance= }}
:{{u|Filetime}}, I agree. Just the sign itself is not helpful since the subject of the article is the entire park. (] · ]) ''']''' 01:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
:+1 --] (]) 12:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:13, 11 February 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconProtected areas Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Rhode Island Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as High-importance).

Images

@Kzirkel, Jllm06, Magnolia677, XRay, and Commonists: Beginning a discussion here to gain consensus around images. I believe File:2021 Roger Williams National Memorial sign.jpg, which @Beyond My Ken: has repeatedly inserted into the article, is of significantly lower quality than an alternative photograph by @Kzirkel:. Thoughts? Filetime (talk) 01:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Filetime, I agree. Just the sign itself is not helpful since the subject of the article is the entire park. (t · c) buidhe 01:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
+1 --Commonists (talk) 12:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Categories: