Misplaced Pages

Talk:Revolution Software: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:10, 18 September 2011 edit7arazred (talk | contribs)496 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:07, 4 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,214 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(97 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Article history| action1 = GAN | action1date = 22:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC) | action1link = Talk:Revolution Software/GA1 | action1result = failed | action1oldid = 454296036 | action2 = GAN | action2date = 11:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC) | action2link = Talk:Revolution Software/GA2 | action2result = failed | action2oldid = 455832002 | currentstatus = FGAN | itndate = | dykdate = | dykentry = | topic = Engineering and Technology | small = }}
{{cvgproj|class=GA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=C|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Yorkshire|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{refideas
|1=http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2015-08-09-broken-sword-and-25-years-of-revolution
}}


==Importance== ==Importance==
This Article should be ''Highly Important'', because Revolution Software made one of the most successful Adventure Classics of All Time! Plus - it was found by a Legendof the Gaming Industry: ''Charles Cecil''! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:42, 17 September 2011</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> This Article should be ''Highly Important'', because Revolution Software made one of the most successful Adventure Classics of All Time! Plus - it was found by a Legendof the Gaming Industry: ''Charles Cecil''! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:42, 17 September 2011</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:Per the ], companies are ranked Top-importance (article forms the basis of all information) if they are highly influential companies, particularly the major Japanese, American, and European companies involved in video game production, e.g. ], ], ]; they are ranked High-importance (article covers a general area of knowledge) if they are top developers and publishers, e.g. ], ]; they are ranked Mid-importance (article fills in general knowledge of specialized topics) if they are most other well-known companies in the industry, e.g. ], ], ]; and Low-importance otherwise. Personally I'm reluctant to go even as high as Mid-importance, because no evidence has been provided of this company being well-known, so I think that Low-importance is justified. --] (]) 14:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC) :Per the ], companies are ranked Top-importance (article forms the basis of all information) if they are highly influential companies, particularly the major Japanese, American, and European companies involved in video game production, e.g. ], ], ]; they are ranked High-importance (article covers a general area of knowledge) if they are top developers and publishers, e.g. ], ]; they are ranked Mid-importance (article fills in general knowledge of specialized topics) if they are most other well-known companies in the industry, e.g. ], ], ]; and Low-importance otherwise. Personally I'm reluctant to go even as high as Mid-importance, because no evidence has been provided of this company being well-known, so I think that Low-importance is justified. --] (]) 14:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
::I personally think the company is mid-to-high (leaning to high) importance, since you could say it "]."

== 3rd GA nomination quick-failed ==

I am removing the current GAN on this, as ''none'' of the concerns from the previous GANs have been addressed. Please stop re-nominating this article for GAN as multiple reviewers have already shown how this fails by a mile. Consider this a quick-fail on the nomination. –] 21:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

==Quality==
{{Featured topic box
|title=Revolution Software
|lead={{icon|C}} ]
|count=13
|image=Charles cecil.jpg
|imagesize=60
|column1=

:::{{icon|B}} ]
:::{{icon|C}} ]
:::{{icon|B}} ]
:::{{icon|GA}} ]
|column2=
:{{icon|GA}} '']''
:{{icon|C}} '']''
:{{icon|GA}} '']''
:{{icon|GA}} '']''
|column3=
:{{icon|A}} '']''
:{{icon|GA}} '']''
:{{icon|GA}} '']''
:{{icon|GA}} '']''
}}

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314001524/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=1&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=1&platform_id=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120127204656/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=6&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=6&platform_id=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927222949/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=7&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=7&platform_id=0
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120715113527/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=9&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=9&platform_id=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927222706/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927222706/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5yPe1QRd2?url=http://www.bafta.org/awards/video-games/nominations-in-2010,1017,BA.html to http://www.bafta.org/awards/video-games/nominations-in-2010,1017,BA.html
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6ALSpvgVr?url=http://www.gameranx.com/features/id/1565/article/top-25-best-ios-games/p/4/ to http://www.gameranx.com/features/id/1565/article/top-25-best-ios-games/p/4/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 00:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

== Source ==

*https://web.archive.org/web/20010708044132/http://www.adventuregamer.com/cgi/news/news.cgi?v=archive&c=Adventure_News&id=07299912593
*https://www.abandonware-magazines.org/affiche_mag.php?mag=27&num=525&album=oui

Latest revision as of 10:07, 4 February 2024

Former good article nomineeRevolution Software was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 6, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
October 16, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconVideo games Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks
AfDs Merge discussions Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Good article nominations DYK nominations Reviews and reassessments
Articles that need...
WikiProject iconYorkshire Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconRevolution Software is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Importance

This Article should be Highly Important, because Revolution Software made one of the most successful Adventure Classics of All Time! Plus - it was found by a Legendof the Gaming Industry: Charles Cecil! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7arazred (talkcontribs) 12:42, 17 September 2011

Per the Importance scale for WikiProject Video games, companies are ranked Top-importance (article forms the basis of all information) if they are highly influential companies, particularly the major Japanese, American, and European companies involved in video game production, e.g. Blizzard Entertainment, Capcom, Nintendo; they are ranked High-importance (article covers a general area of knowledge) if they are top developers and publishers, e.g. Epic Games, Neversoft; they are ranked Mid-importance (article fills in general knowledge of specialized topics) if they are most other well-known companies in the industry, e.g. IGN, Gamestop, Naughty Dog; and Low-importance otherwise. Personally I'm reluctant to go even as high as Mid-importance, because no evidence has been provided of this company being well-known, so I think that Low-importance is justified. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
I personally think the company is mid-to-high (leaning to high) importance, since you could say it "has been proven notable (more will be added)."

3rd GA nomination quick-failed

I am removing the current GAN on this, as none of the concerns from the previous GANs have been addressed. Please stop re-nominating this article for GAN as multiple reviewers have already shown how this fails by a mile. Consider this a quick-fail on the nomination. –MuZemike 21:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality

edit | discuss Revolution Software 13 articles
Charles Cecil
Tony Warriner
Steve Ince
Virtual Theatre
Lure of the Temptress
Beneath a Steel Sky
In Cold Blood
Broken Sword
Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars
Broken Sword II: The Smoking Mirror
Broken Sword: The Sleeping Dragon
Broken Sword: The Angel of Death

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Revolution Software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Source

Categories: