Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Russia: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:00, 22 September 2011 editRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →Berezovsky article: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:25, 26 December 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,348 edits →Good article reassessment for Eurasian Economic Union: new sectionTag: New topic 
Line 1: Line 1:
]
{{WikiProject Russia|class=Project|importance=NA|notaskforce=yes}}
{{talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=NA|notaskforce=yes}}
}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-12-12/WikiProject report|writer= ]| ||day =12|month=December|year=2011}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-02-12/WikiProject report|writer=]||day=12|month=February|year=2014}}
{{Todo}} {{Todo}}
{| align=right !important; {| align=right !important;
|{{Misplaced Pages:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Russia articles by quality statistics}} |{{Misplaced Pages:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Russia articles by quality statistics}}
|} |}
{{Outline of knowledge coverage WPT|Russia}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 2 |counter = 6
|archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}}
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadsleft = 5
|algo = old(60d)
|minthreadstoarchive = 2
|algo = old(91d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Russia/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Russia/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{Archive box|auto=yes}}

== Category Split could use some help! ==

<small>cross-posted to ] and ].</small>

Hello all, There were a few categories that came up at ]. According to the desicon reached ], the following cats are supposed to be split:
:*] into ] and ]
:*] into ] and ]
:*] into ] and ]

This discussion closed a month ago, and as you can see, there is still some work to be done. I don't feel that I know enough to help with this split, so I'm reaching out. :) If anyone can spare a few moments to help get this done, it would be appreciated. Спасибо! <sup>]</sup>]</sub><small> @ 18:54, 1 Adar II 5771 / 7 March 2011 (UTC)</small>

== Kaliningrad Oblast ==

There is currently an argument at ] as to when Kaliningrad Oblast is established. I postulate that the oblast was established in April 1946 and given its present name in July 1946. An anonymous editor interprets the April date as the date the territory of the oblast "joined the USSR" (whatever that means), and that the oblast was actually established in July. The source in the article does not support that point of view, and neither does the Charter of Kaliningrad Oblast (a link to which I posted on the talk page). Additional input would be appreciated, as the anon is obviously not going to stop with the reverts to restore his/her opinion.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); April&nbsp;27, 2011; 14:43 (UTC)
:OK, never mind. Hopefully this is now resolved.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); April&nbsp;27, 2011; 15:45 (UTC)

== Romanization of Russian guidelines ==

A discussion is currently underway about the fate of the romanization of Russian guideline, which is one of the main guidelines in the scope of this WikiProject. The former ] guideline has been split into ] (romanization) and ] (naming conventions), but there are several finer points on both pages that are still under debate. There are several threads open on both talk pages and additional input will be very welcome.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); July&nbsp;1, 2011; 15:15 (UTC)

== Novaya Zemlya and Solovetsky District ==

Now I am finalizing my work on ] articles (about two more weeks needed), and I have run into a point which I do not undertand. Municipally, the law lists 19 districts and 7 urban okrugs (Arkhangelsk, Koryazhma, Kotlas, Mirny, Novaya Zemlya, Novodvinsk, and Severodvinsk). Administratively, the OKATO classification lists 20 districts (the extra one is Solovetsky District), Novaya Zemlya territory subordinate to the oblast, and 6 towns of the oblast significance (Arkhangelsk, Koryazhma, Kotlas, Onega, Novodvinsk, and Severodvinsk). Mirny is the town of the federal significance. Our page ] lists Solovetsky district, as well as ] (which are municipally both part of the Primorsky District), and does not list ] at all, like if it does not exist. The template {{tl|Arkhangelsk Oblast}} lists Solovetsky District but does not list Novaya Zemlya. (It also lists ], but this is ok as soon as Nenets AO is part of Arkhangelsk Oblast). Then I have the following questions,
* Should we remove the ] from the template and the administrative division page (it was merged into Primorsky District in 2006)? Or does it still exist administratively? Note that there is currently no page on the district anyway, it is redirected to ]. If there should be a page, I will create the page.
* Should we add Novaya Zemlya to the template and the page? To which place? It is not a city and not a district. Should it be a separate line in the template?
* In the intro on the districts of Arkhangels Oblast I write smth like "XXX District is one of the YY districts of Arkhangelsk Oblast" (one can check, I have these intros for all districts but Onezhsky, which I will do in several days). Is YY=19 (if we do not count Solovetsky District not Novaya Zemlya), YY=21 (if we count both), or YY=20 (if we only count one of them)?
* Should it be a page on the urban okrug of Novaya Zemlya, or are we just fine with the redirect to the archipelago page?
* Additionally, I may have created some mess with municipal vs administrative in the templates in the articles on ] and ], I would appreciate somebody having a look.

Thanks in advance,--] (]) 14:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
:The municipal and administrative divisions of the federal subjects are not required by law to match, even though they mostly do, because it's convenient. Arkhangelsk Oblast in particular is one federal subject where the differences are very noticeable and present on the higher levels of the hierarchy. Another problem is that the OKATO is very inaccurate when it comes to Arkhangelsk Oblast; in no small part because Arkhangelsk Oblast is one of the few federal subjects which does not yet have an official registry of the administrative-territorial divisions, so OKATO uses outdated data (the registry is planned to be released around 2012 or 2013; I don't quite remember the date but can check). Our "administrative divisions of Arkhangelsk Oblast" page, however, is only sourced to OKATO, and badly needs to be updated (I myself was waiting for the release of the registry, but the upper divisions can be updated now based just on the law on the administrative-territorial division). So, while ''municipally'' there are indeed nineteen districts and seven urban okrugs, ''administratively'' there are in fact twenty-one district, seven cities/towns of oblast significance, and two island territories. Here are the main differences between the two aspects:
:*Novaya Zemlya Administrative District is municipally incorporated as Novaya Zemlya Urban Okrug;
:*Solovetsky Administrative District was never merged; it is municipally incorporated as Solovetskoye Rural Settlement of Primorsky Municipal District, but retains its administrative district status nevertheless;
:*Onega is administratively incorporated as a town of oblast significance, but municipally it is organized as Onezhskoye Urban Settlement of Onezhsky Municipal District;
:*Franz-Joseph Land and Victoria Island are considered to be island territories administratively; they are not a part of any other administrative-territorial entity. "Island territories" is a concept unique to Arkhangelsk Oblast. Municipally, they are a part of Primorsky Municipal District (organized as inter-settlement territories; i.e., they are not a part of any lower-level municipal division).
:*The rest of the administrative districts match the municipal districts, and the rest of the cities/towns of oblast significance match the urban okrugs.
:As far as organizing the information, our articles follow the following chain: physical geography entity, administrative-territorial entity, municipal entity. What this means is that the article about the physical geography entity (when applicable) is created first, and that the article about an administrative division takes priority over the article about a municipal division. For example, ] is an article about the physical geography entity (archipelago), which should mention the fact that it is administratively organized as a district (the statement about the island territory currently there is outdated), and should mention that it is municipally organized as an urban okrug. The articles about the island territory and the urban okrug can be created, too, once there is enough information to warrant splitting that information out. With Solovki, again, we have an article about the islands, to which "Solovetsky District" is a redirect and where the rural settlement status should be mentioned. If there is enough to say about the district which pertains to the administrative concept but not to the islands, then yes, of course the article should be created under "Solovetsky District". Same goes for "Solovetskoye Rural Settlement"&mdash;if enough can be said about this municipal division which doesn't really belong in the administrative district article, then it can be created, too.
:With the intros, the articles about the administrative districts should say "one of twenty-one" (and the municipal incorporation status and details would follow later). The articles about the municipal districts should not be created when the municipal districts match the administrative districts; the municipal aspect information goes into the article about the administrative district, which is always primary.
:Does this help? I think I've given enough information to answer all your questions, but if I missed anything, it'll be my pleasure to follow-up. Best,—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); August&nbsp;8, 2011; 15:02 (UTC)
:: Yes, this definitely helps, thanks. I will try to sort all this mess out.--] (]) 15:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

== IrAero Flight 103 ==

Many English language sources are reporting that 12 people were injured in the accident that befell ]. However, appears to be saying 12 killed. Can I please have some confirmation that this is the case? ] (]) 12:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
:The Rostransnadzor link says nobody was killed. Perhaps there was a mistake and they fixed it. ] ] 12:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
::"На борту находились 36 человек, в том числе трое детей. В результате авиационного события пострадали 12 человек, погибших нет. Воздушное судно получило значительные повреждения." ==> (raw Google translate) ''On board were 36 people, including three children. As a result, aviation event affected '''12 people who died''' there. The aircraft received substantial damage.'' ] (]) 12:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
::: No, Google just translates incorrectly. The correct translation is that 12 (out of 36) were injured, nobody was killed. It might be also some confusion with the recent air crash in Magadan Oblast, where indeed 12 people died (everybody on board).--] (]) 13:38, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

== Russian Foursquare merge ==

The articles ] and ] should be merged (either way), and could do with some editing as well. ] (]) 05:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

== Barma - Regalia of the Russian tsars ==

Can anyone help out with some specialist knowledge? I've been doing some cleanup on ] and come across the heading 'Barmas of Old Ryazan'. Barma isn't a word in the OED, nor in Britannica, nor in a specialised art dictionary I've consulted. WP:RU has an corresponding article ] which Google translates (my Russian is rudimentary) as 'barma' or 'barmah' = 'shoulder mantle', which fits the description, but the pictures in the article show jewellery rather than a mantle (perhaps the jewellery was sewn onto the mantle?) And is this word singular or plural? It seems to be always used in the plural even when referring to just one item. Is there an English equivalent word? Also, Google is unable to translate "дробница" in:
Бармы из круглых металлических щитков-дробниц, скреплённых шнурами и украшенных драгоценными камнями и эмалями, появились в Визант, где входили в парадную одежду императов.

Online dictionaries suggest that this is a misspelling for гробница (tomb, sepulchre) but that doesn't make much sense in the context, as far as I can tell. Any suggestions? ] (]) 13:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
:] is plural, and yes, it denotes the jewelery sewn onto the mantle. The jewelry is composed of small metal discs/shields called "дробница". I think that ] could be worn both sewn onto the mantle or without it. ] ] 14:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
::I have never heard of such words before, even so I am a native russian speaker. Words "barma" or "дробница" are not used in modern Russian language and I never seen them in the common history books. Please do not invent new words in our language. Russians mostly use word "бусы" for the beads, no matter what is the beads made of. Word "дробница" would be rather associated with ] ball, since "дробь" means "]". I think the author simply spelled in Russian letters some ] word (in the sentence quoted above), since he talked about decorations of the ] emperors. ] (]) 20:00, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
:::], ]. ] ] 08:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

== Open page move discussions ==

* ''(])'' –'''] → {{noredirect|1=Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna}}'''
* ''(])'' – '''] → {{noredirect|1=Nagatinsky Zaton District}}''' ] (]) 14:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

== Question about Moscow districts ==

The ] CIS office is at Bolshoy Gnezdnykovsky Pereulok D1/2, Moscow, Russia
What part of Moscow is this in?
Thanks,
] (]) 18:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
* Pretty much in the center, inside the ]: 55°45'42" N, 37° 36' 17" E.--] (]) 18:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
**Yup, that's in ].—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); August&nbsp;30, 2011; 18:47 (UTC)
***Thank you so much! ] (]) 01:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Now, would it be alright if I learned the districts for the following too:
*] HQ: 10, Arbat street, 119002 Moscow
**]
*] Moscow Sales Office: World Trade Center (WTC) Room 606, Mezhdunarodnaya-2 Building, 12 Krasnopresnenskaya Nab, 123610, Moscow, Russia
**]
*] HQ: 119017, Moscow, Russia Bolshaya Ordynka str. 22/2/1
**]
*] HQ: 45 "G" Leningradsky Avenue, Moscow, 125190, Russian Federation
**]
*] HQ: bldg. 1, 68, Leningradsky prospect, Moscow, 125315, Russia
**]
*] HQ: 125284, Russian Federation, Moscow, 1-st Botkinsky drive, 7
**]
*] Moscow office: Russia 109012 Moscow 8/2, Novaya Square, Floors 4, 6
**]
*] HQ: 23B, Polikarpov str., Moscow, 125284, Russia, p/b 604
**]
*] HQ: Russia, Moscow, Academician Tupolev Embankment 17
**]
*] HQ: Ulansky side-street, bld.1, 22 Moscow 101000, Russia
**]
*] HQ: 125315 Russia, Moscow, Leningradskiy prospect, 68
**]
*] (] HQ is located here)
**]
Thanks,
] (]) 01:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
:I've added the districts to the list above.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); August&nbsp;31, 2011; 13:28 (UTC)
::Thank you very much! It was especially helpful regarding the ] since that one has many aviation related businesses, and it is explicitly stated as having them by the official English page ] (]) 16:28, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
:::Any time.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); August&nbsp;31, 2011; 16:40 (UTC)

== FAR ==

{{#if:|] has|I have}} nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, ] and a clue-bat • <sup>(])</sup> 03:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

== Romanization of Russian guideline, cont'd ==

A straw poll is currently being conducted at ] regarding the future fate of the romanization of Russian guideline. The administrator handling the closure would like to determine whether the page needs further work, can be marked as WikiProject Style Advice right away, or should be sent for further consideration by the community to mark it as a full guideline. Your opinion on this matter would be greatly appreciated. There is also a comment section should you be inclined to elaborate on your selection. Thanks.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); September&nbsp;9, 2011; 13:47 (UTC)

== More district questions (Moscow and St. Petersburg) ==

Hi! Which Moscow district is this located in?
* Sevastopolsky prospekt, 28/1, Moscow, Russia 117209 (] head office)

And which St. Petersburg district are these located in?
* Nevsky pr., 61 (] headquarters)
* 18/4 Pilotov str., St.Petersburg, 196210, Russia (former ] headquarters)

Thanks
] (]) 16:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
:Aero Rent is in ]. Rossiya is in ] of ], and Pulkovo Aviation's headquarters are in ].—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); September&nbsp;9, 2011; 17:28 (UTC)
::Thank you so much! ] (]) 20:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

== ] ==


== Page move request ==
The aricle is under hard long-time COI attack, that poured here from Russian Misplaced Pages. Needs mediation, can someone help please? --] (]) 07:00, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


See ]: rename to ]. --] ] 18:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
== Misplaced Pages:Moon landing ==


== ] ==
This redirect is up for discussion. Please see ]. ]]....] ''creating lakes for 5 years'' 20:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


] has created ] if anyone is interested in reviewing the article and providing feedback. ] (]) 15:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
== Gazprom HQ ==


== Requested move at ] ==
This is in Moscow:
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran ] 21:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
* Location:
16 Nametkina St., Moscow,
Russian Federation


== Requested move at ] ==
Which district is it in?
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks
] (]) 00:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
:]. Are you going to request many more? :)—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); September&nbsp;12, 2011; 13:43 (UTC)
::Not at the moment, Ezhiki - They come by when I encounter them. Currently I'm focusing on Hong Kong, so I may not get to more Russian stuff till later. Thank you so much for your help :) ] (]) 21:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
:::No problem; it's just easier for me to look them up in batches than one by one. Cheers,—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); September&nbsp;12, 2011; 21:33 (UTC)


== Deletion review of Anti-Russian violence in Chechnya (1991–1994) ==
== ] on ] ==


You may want to weigh in ]. ]<sub>]</sub> 07:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I'm an editor who spends a lot of time at ] and would like to request the help of anyone who is able to read Russian. Recently, ] has been brought to ] regarding a user who claims to be the secretary (translation of "секретарь" on Google Translate) of ]. A controversy has been brought over from ru.wp regarding the content of the subject's article, which appears to be highly referenced, but is being whitewashed by ] who claims that the content is not true.
If you speak Russian, can you assist the COI case by reading through the references and letting us know how reliable they are? If Ssr's goals are not contrary to WP's, there doesn't appear to be a COI. If they're whitewashing bad press from the article, we'll take immediate action but that's all hinging on references that I can't read as someone who doesn't know Russian. ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 17:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
:The first paragraph ("Misharin regularly pushes for a project of high-speed train line...") is sourced to a , which, in turn, attributes its article to &mdash;a regional online publication which bids itself as a "modern portal of Yekaterinburg". Another source (RBC) is a well-known and reputable media company. The trainclub article, however, does not say that Misharin "regularly pushes for a high-speed train project"; it merely states that building such a road is one of the goals the governor aims to achieve. The RBC reference confirms the costs of the project given in our article (although it converts euros to dollars); however, the sentence starting with "due to vast distances..." is written with an obvious negative POV. The RBC article simply states the costs but does not draw any conclusions as to whether the costs are too high or whether air travel should be a more economical way to solve the transportation problem (indeed, it says that a trip in a high-speed train would take ~7 hours as opposed to ~30 hours in a regular train; an obvious contrast to the high-speed train vs. air travel comparison ssr removed). The last 66.ru ref in that paragraph says that the costs of the project are too high to expect it completed any time before 2020, but does label Misharin as an overspender or somesuch. All in all, I'd say that while the facts in this paragraph are right, there is an obvious spin to make the governor look as an opportunistic schemer; a spin which is present in none of the cited sources. I'd say it is a BLP problem, although not one a good re-write wouldn't fix.
::Did my best to address the issue. Now 12 sources, changed tone, checked for citedness of claims. Please tell if not good enough. ] (]) 17:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
:::Please do'nt add content to tha article any more, see ] for details. --] (]) 04:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
::::That is the complaint I filed. What's wrong with it? I see absolutely no reason to stop editing. Albeit, I've done everything I was going to do. And please stop blanking the section, I will undo that anyway. ] (]) 07:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
:The second paragraph ("In July 2010...") is sourced to '']''&mdash;a reputable Russian business newspaper&mdash;as well as to RBC. The billboard campaign is the subject of the article in ''Kommersant'', but it is mainly about the controversy regarding the funding for the campaign itself. There is a short note about the opposition parties commenting that the United Russia party could not have allocated 1.3 billion roubles for roads construction because that's the money of the taxpayers, not the party's own funds, but that's just usual politicking (the text on the billboard says the money was "attracted", not "paid" by the party). The RBC article is about the government of Russia allocating money for roads construction, and is not related to Misharin in any way. The two sentences in the second paragraph thus amount to little more than ] and a ].
::Removed ] (]) 04:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
:The third paragraph (''Misharin ran a campaign for cancellation of city mayor elections...'') is unreferenced, and that, coupled with its accusative tone makes it a ripe candidate for removal as a BLP violation.
::I added a nice ref to a Kommersant article. If you need more, I may find more. ] (]) 04:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
:I did not research the rest of the paragraphs with the similar level of detail, but a cursory glance confirms the same pattern as in the first three. The sources themselves are mostly of adequate quality, but are either used in a way to present the information in a negative light or are ], producing an outcome neither source would independently confirm otherwise.
::That is a matter of wording. I did my best to follow original wordings closely. If not OK please tell. ] (]) 04:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
:That said, I do not believe there is no place for a "controversy" section in that article at all. While ssr's removal of the section seems to be more or less in line with our BLP guidelines, I do have my doubts he has the interests of Misplaced Pages above his job duties. When properly re-written and sourced, a "controversy" section would be a good addition to the article; but in the state ssr removed it, it is indeed mostly (but not completely) a BLP violation. This section should be written by someone who is capable of writing it ], and sadly I don't think either Gritzko or ssr qualify. Until a person willing to do that job appears, I would recommend the complete removal of that section.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); September&nbsp;12, 2011; 18:22 (UTC)
::This is a great write-up. It's very helpful. Thank you for taking the time to address this issue. ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 20:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
:::Glad to be of service. Best of luck with the case.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); September&nbsp;12, 2011; 20:08 (UTC)
::Thanks for your comments, but I don't think such a third person would ever appear (requirements: acceptable level of English, familiarity with the rules of Misplaced Pages, knowledge of the topic, sufficient motivation). Hence, let's try to improve the text we have. ] (]) 04:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)


== Discussion invite: length of Joseph Stalin article ==
== Hi there ==


Editors are invited to give comments on the legnth of the article ]. The discussion can be found at ]. ] (]) 17:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Are you guys sure you are not overstretching the scope of your project somewhat? It is of course up to you to decide how you play with your toys, but you might consider that tagging everything pretty much amounts to tagging nothing. ] (]) 15:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
:I agree that tagging all those butterflies might be a bit overstretching, but does no harm. As for the British scholar studying Soviet history, this seems perfectly relevant to the project. ] ] 17:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
::I've reverted the moth assessments and will try to assess only ] ones in the future. ] ] 17:29, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 06:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)


== A Class promotion for ] ==
==Help requested: unaccompanied minor in Russia==
See ]. Is it true? Are there sources for this? If so, can somebody please try to add it to the article ]? I know some Russian, but it would be extremely tedious to do this myself. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 11:58, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


According to ], when there is not a formal process to assess A class, it requires the support of at least two uninvolved editors without significant opposes. This is to let you know know that I have started a discussion for whether to upgrade the ] to A. I hope to hear feedback. Thanks, ] (]) 01:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
== Berezovsky article ==


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
As this project is clearly within scope, I'd appreciate some uninvolved input over at ]. Thanks, ] <sup>]</sup> 20:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:25, 26 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Russia and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconRussia
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
WikiProject Russia was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 12 December 2011.
WikiProject Russia was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 12 February 2014.

To-do list for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Russia: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2014-01-18

Things you can do Привет and Welcome! The following is a list of things you can do:

Russia articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 9 17 29 31 1 87
FL 2 4 6 2 14
FM 96 96
A 2 3 12 12 29
GA 28 39 117 226 3 413
B 220 297 522 771 248 2,058
C 359 634 1,290 3,014 823 6,120
Start 436 1,529 6,443 14,654 1 2,523 25,586
Stub 12 231 4,105 45,227 49 3,607 53,231
List 70 96 437 3,290 36 246 4,175
Category 18,337 18,337
Disambig 178 178
File 460 460
Portal 21 21
Project 134 134
Redirect 2 518 1,789 2,309
Template 3,909 3,909
NA 21 3,885 3,906
Other 120 120
Assessed 1,138 2,850 12,963 67,766 29,015 7,451 121,183
Unassessed 370 1,365 1,735
Total 1,138 2,850 12,963 68,136 29,015 8,816 122,918
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 478,182 Ω = 5.47

Page move request

See Talk:Folklore of Russia: rename to Russian folklore. --Altenmann >talk 18:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Succession, continuity and legacy of the Soviet Union

RuASG has created Succession, continuity and legacy of the Soviet Union if anyone is interested in reviewing the article and providing feedback. Mellk (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Mezhdunarodnaya (Moscow Metro)#Requested move 28 October 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mezhdunarodnaya (Moscow Metro)#Requested move 28 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review of Anti-Russian violence in Chechnya (1991–1994)

You may want to weigh in here. Alaexis¿question? 07:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Discussion invite: length of Joseph Stalin article

Editors are invited to give comments on the legnth of the article Joseph Stalin. The discussion can be found at on the article's talk page. Z1720 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:RSM-56 Bulava#Requested move 3 November 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:RSM-56 Bulava#Requested move 3 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Frostly (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

A Class promotion for 1995 Neftegorsk earthquake

According to WP:A?, when there is not a formal process to assess A class, it requires the support of at least two uninvolved editors without significant opposes. This is to let you know know that I have started a discussion for whether to upgrade the 1995 Neftegorsk earthquake to A. I hope to hear feedback. Thanks, SamBroGaming (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Eurasian Economic Union

Eurasian Economic Union has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: