Revision as of 15:20, 12 October 2011 editBenlisquare (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,176 editsm Reverted edits by 22WHERO (talk) to last version by RJHall← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:23, 12 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,298,573 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Aviation}}, {{WikiProject Canada}}, {{WikiProject United States}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(20 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell| |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C||b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|Aviation-task-force= yes|Canadian-task-force= yes|US-task-force= y|Cold-War=y}} |
|
1={{WPMILHIST |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Aviation|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y }} |
|
|class= Start |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Canada|importance=Mid |on=yes}} |
|
|Aviation-task-force= yes |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low}} |
|
|Canadian-task-force= yes |
|
|
|US-task-force= yes |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
<!-- NORAD secondary command --> |
|
{{WikiProject Spaceflight}} <!-- space defence --> |
|
|
|
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Aviation|class= Start }} <!-- air defence --> |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Canada|class=Start |importance=Mid |on=yes}} |
|
|
|
| counter = 1 |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low}} <!-- NORAD secondary command --> |
|
|
|
| algo = old(730d) |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 200k |
|
|
| archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|
| archive = Talk:CFB North Bay/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
==]/CFB North Bay== |
|
|
Are these two close enough to be merged? I don't know enough about them to say. ] 16:05, 27 September 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
No, the two are unrelated, although this was not always the case. Originally, the airfield was part of the base, however, after the cuts to CFB North Bay, the airfield ownership reverted to the City of North Bay. The two are geographically close, however, there are no CFB North Bay opperations taking place at the airfield which now operates solely as a civilian airfield. Hope that clears things up a bit. -Hauger 00:07 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever wrote the information regarding Tudhope and the airfields, can you provide links or further information, especially regarding Diver? I used to go to the McConnell Lake area as a kid and knew Diver was an old air field, but there's absolutely no information regarding it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
==] by ]== |
|
|
|
|
|
You '''cannot''' use ''yourself'' as a reference. References must be ] and ], and should be properly cited. Anything else is considered ], and under Misplaced Pages policy, must be deleted immediately. Your recent additions are still unreferenced, as you have merely cited yourself as a reference - print references such as books, journals and newspaper articles require the format '''AUTHOR – DATE – TITLE – PUBLISHER – PAGE – ISBN NUMBER''', while online sources require a URL, Title, Author and Date (while noting that the source must still be ]), all placed at the bottom of the article in a reference list, using the <nowiki>{{Reflist}}</nowiki> template. ] are preferred, so that each sentence can be verified by a footnote linking to a reference (through the use of the <nowiki><ref></nowiki> tag). A source is only ] if it is written in the proper format, so that others are ''able'' to verify it. Also consider learning to use WikiSyntax when writing articles, and ensuring that you are able to properly use templates. Additionally, it can be argued that you have a ] with the given article; Misplaced Pages prohibits users from editing articles that may have a direct relation with the individual person; given by your username, ''"22wingheritageoffice"'', which appears to show that this account is being used by an office of an establishment, such editing may be in violation with ]. Also note that you cannot ] articles; if your edits have been reverted, there is most possibly a reason for it. --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">]</span> | <small>—] ] ]</small> 04:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
|