Misplaced Pages

Talk:Revolution Software/GA2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Revolution Software Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:46, 16 October 2011 edit7arazred (talk | contribs)496 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:05, 21 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
#::Shoddily put together, please read the ] and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. ] (]) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC) #::Shoddily put together, please read the ] and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. ] (]) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
#:: <!-- Template:GAList --> #:: <!-- Template:GAList -->

This artcile has not been reviewed. ] simply copied and pasted ] altering the failure points to passes. ] (]) 14:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

:Seconding the above just for the record. Apparently by ], though I cannot see how this is any short of socking given ] created this page 10 min later. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;▎]</small> 14:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:05, 21 February 2022

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 7arazred (talk · contribs) 21:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead adequately summarises the article, see WP:LEAD
    The prose good, it is "reasonably well written".
    It's well organised, information is presented logically. Please read WP:MoS and subpages.
  2. It is accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    stable

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Shoddily put together, please read the good article criteria and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This artcile has not been reviewed. 7arazred simply copied and pasted Talk:Revolution Software/GA1 altering the failure points to passes. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Seconding the above just for the record. Apparently nominated by Bsbass, though I cannot see how this is any short of socking given 7arazred created this page 10 min later. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 14:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)